South Carolina...will it choose to exercise a pro-Constitutional kickback against the unConstitutional Obama and his Socialist-Communist friends as they try to overthrow the US Constitution? Or is this just hot air, and an invitation to an Obama Totalitarian State against all who dare disagree with Obama? That is, to overthrow Obama's policies or advocate the same, would be like when the British took people outside and shot them dead without trial in the Colonial days. But instead, being more civilized, South Carolina simply gives the victims 10 years in prison and a $25,000 fine.
Obama's campaign took foreign monies for elections, used terrorist labor groups to work the election phones, consorted with foreign governments like Iraq to work against cooperating with the Bush Administration to create election tension favorable to them (violating the Logan Act), advocated the overthrow of the United States of America by their own definition of "fundamentally transforming America" as defined on how they view the need to crash the system -- throw out the US Constitution -- and start over. Where is Obama's prosecution? What of the quid pro quo effect even at the Federal levels?
"Whoever solicits or receives 'any' thing of value, in consideration of the promise of support or use of influence in obtaining for any person any appointive office or place under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both." -- 18 USC Chapter 11 Section 211
Where is George Soros's prosecution? What about Andy Stern of the SEIU (whose group drafts the majority of the Healthcare Bills aimed at Federal Usurpation of Constitutional powers) and Wade Rathke of ACORN and others there (whose organization defrauded voters in some (allegedly 17) states during the 2008 Presidential election? And on and on we can go.
So will the State of South Carolina take on the illegal office holder and his Czars, his so-called board of directors to the neo-Communist-Socialist Oligarchy Government they intend to replace our current Republic with?
No US politician at this time has the patriotism, the guts, and the foundation of all he or she needs to challenge Obama on the merits of his illegality...not because the information isn't there, as my detailed and sourced challenges shortened for only the sake of length prove... but they worry more about themselves than anything else. The TEA party can provide the base of support using informed and rational arguments, and there is enough of an Internet Conservative base to spread the word and grow the movement legally and peacefully, until the goals are met.
That means talking to the world media and creating interest and pressure from without, to legally and peacefully work within the system and make change to move the USA more toward an Originalist Constitutional View of how to conduct Government from within. Smaller Federal Government with less Bureaucracy, a lower tax rate, a removal of pork spending, a demand for better stewardship, a freeze or cuts on federal pay-scales by 30% for the next 10 years, a required amount of time for Representatives to hear from their constituents and their address of grievances before moving ahead with major legislation (up to 30 days), no taxation increases without it being the majority opinion of at least 67% of their constituents, and so on.
South Carolina expects Communist-Socialists like ACORN and the ACLU and also terrorists like in Muslim Synagogues run by Hamas, Hezbollah, etc. in South Carolina to actually "register" as subversives? Are they smoking dope when they write this stuff? Or is it intentionally written against one group that might sue for their rights, and a intentionally gapped legislation to let the Communists and Terrorists to walk free, while punishing the non-Muslim terrorists, non-Communists, non-traitors by making the definitions change or evolve on our watch?
The SC SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES REGISTRATION ACT appears below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t23c029.htm
South Carolina Code of Laws
(Unannotated)
Title 23 - Law Enforcement and Public Safety
CHAPTER 29.
SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES REGISTRATION ACT
SECTION 23-29-10. Short title.
This chapter may be cited as the "Subversive Activities Registration Act."
SECTION 23-29-20. Definitions.
For the purposes of this chapter the following words, phrases and terms are defined as follows:
(1) "Subversive organization" means every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means;
(2) "Organization subject to foreign control" means every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or other organization, composed of two or more persons, which comes within either of the following:
(a) it solicits or accepts financial contributions, loans or support of any kind directly or indirectly from, or is affiliated directly or indirectly with, a foreign government or a political subdivision thereof, an agent, agency or instrumentality of a foreign government or political subdivision thereof, a political party in a foreign country or an international political organization or
(b) its policies, or any of them, are determined by or at the suggestion of, or in collaboration with, a foreign government or political subdivision thereof, an agent, agency or instrumentality of a foreign government or a political subdivision thereof, a political party in a foreign country or an international political organization;
(3) "Foreign agent" means any person whose actions, or any of them, are determined by or at the suggestion of, or in collaboration with, a foreign government or political subdivision thereof, an instrumentality or agency of a foreign government or political subdivision thereof, a political party in a foreign country or an international political organization; and
(4) "Business" includes, but is not limited to, speaking engagements.
SECTION 23-29-30. Effect on freedom of press or speech.
Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to authorize, require or establish censorship or to limit in any way or infringe upon freedom of the press or of speech as guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States and no regulation shall be promulgated hereunder having that effect.
SECTION 23-29-40. Organizations exempt from application of chapter.
The terms of this chapter do not apply to any labor union or religious, fraternal or patriotic organization, society or association, or their members, whose objectives and aims do not contemplate the overthrow of the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means.
SECTION 23-29-50. Registration by subversive and foreign-controlled organizations.
Every subversive organization and organization subject to foreign control shall register with the Secretary of State on forms prescribed by him within thirty days after coming into existence in this State.
SECTION 23-29-60. Registration of members of subversive and foreign-controlled organizations.
Every member of a subversive organization, or an organization subject to foreign control, every foreign agent and every person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means, who resides, transacts any business or attempts to influence political action in this State, shall register with the Secretary of State on the forms and at the times prescribed by him.
SECTION 23-29-70. Forms and schedule for filing information.
Every organization or person coming within the provisions of this chapter shall file with the Secretary of State all information which he may request, on the forms and at the times he may prescribe.
SECTION 23-29-80. Promulgation of rules and regulations.
The Secretary of State may adopt and promulgate any rules and regulations, not inconsistent with the terms of this chapter, which may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter and may alter or repeal such rules and regulations.
SECTION 23-29-90. Penalties.
Any organization or person who violates any of the provisions of this chapter shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by a fine of not more than twenty-five thousand dollars or imprisonment for not more than ten years, or by both fine and imprisonment.
--------------------------------------------------
Are there unfounded fears about this law? Keep in mind that Harold Koh at the State Department demands, along with Obama and executive usurpers (by association), that we be subject to International Law, NOT US CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. An international court could cite South Carolina's Act as a precedent, add stringencies, and apply it to all Americans. In fact, Canada and Mexico are supposed to join the US in being a region under one international governance in the New World Order, and Europe in the past and present does not believe in "free speech" for the majority.
Case in point: Geert Wilders. On trial in early February 2010, and currently, as of 02/08/2010 on going.
http://www.wildersontrial.com/
Geert Wilders was charged with:
1) making collective or group insults of Muslims,
2) inciting hatred or discrimination against Muslims based on their religious beliefs [Read: even if many are violently bloodthirsty alien oppressors and clearly perverse, wanting to subjugate and take over the Netherlands by force and fear],
3) inciting xenophobic hatred and discrimination, especially against Moroccans due to their race.
When the British forcibly entered the homes and took over the American Colonies by acts of legalized violence, thefts, rapes of its subjects under the Stamp Act...and without trial, simply took Colonial citizens and shot them dead, without even asking a single question of them...the colonies eventually took up the gun when the right to free speech and redress their grievances were denied.
The world of violence in the Middle Ages to the Revolutionary War was often horrific. Case in point, what happened to those who were charged with High Treason hundreds of years ago...from which barbarity we Americans refused to imitate?
"THE punishment of high treafon in general is very solemn and terrible."
1. That the offender be drawn to the gallows, and not be carried or walk; though usually a fledge or hurdle is allowed, to preserve the offender from the extreme torment of being dragged on the ground or pavement.
2. That he be hanged by the neck, and then cut down alive.
3. That his entrails (intestines) be taken out, and burned, while he is yet alive.
4. That his head be cut off.
5. That his body be divided into four parts.
6. That his head and quarters be "at the king's dispofal." (disposal)
"THE king may, and often doth, discharge all the punishment, except beheading, especially where any of noble blood are attainted. For, beheading being part of the judgment, that may be executed, though all the rest be omitted by the king's command." -- Blackstone 4.6 at p. 95
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/blackstone_bk4ch6.asp
Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution, 3.28 @1293 citing same
http://www.lonang.com/exlibris/story/sto-328.htm#fn1d ]
Governments and the judges that operate in them ought to exercise common sense (if they have any left) and to be very careful of any regulating of rare and historically unique gift we have of the right to one's own personal opinion and free speech, or the right to redress their grievances. It may take centuries to turn back from such a mess once we have quagmired away from our inalienable rights and liberties given us from G-D. History is a testimony to that fact. They ought not to be legislating unjust back-lash or the shedding of innocent citizen blood for personal political gain as communists and tyrants who want their Government and structural order to break down into anarchy and chaos apparently do. History tells us that the denial of free speech with violent oppressions on a multi-faceted front disallows the release of needed pressures placed upon the masses, and ultimately leads to violence.
That is why the TEA Party is a healthy release. That is why Conservative Talk Radio and any such on Television is a healthy release. That is why Free Speech and the right to hold to one's own opinion, is a healthy release.
We need legal and peaceful ways of resolving issues...and if the facts or history of a group's rhetoric of taking over the world by violence, killing all unbelievers, raping girls of only 6 to 9 years old and calling them wives is inciting hatred...don't get mad at the one crying out the alarm, go after the one's espousing pedophilia and doing it, go after the one's killing for any reason or no reason at all, and then hiding behind "religion" like the backward thinking terrorists that far too many Muslim extremists and fundamentalists are. We have their texts, their hadiths, their regular current video and televised statements all telling us they mean to take over, to kill, and to oppress any who do not submit to their will. So why protect the murderers and imprison the victims in the Netherlands, or anywhere for that matter, who protest?
Obama's campaign took foreign monies for elections, used terrorist labor groups to work the election phones, consorted with foreign governments like Iraq to work against cooperating with the Bush Administration to create election tension favorable to them (violating the Logan Act), advocated the overthrow of the United States of America by their own definition of "fundamentally transforming America" as defined on how they view the need to crash the system -- throw out the US Constitution -- and start over. Where is Obama's prosecution? What of the quid pro quo effect even at the Federal levels?
"Whoever solicits or receives 'any' thing of value, in consideration of the promise of support or use of influence in obtaining for any person any appointive office or place under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both." -- 18 USC Chapter 11 Section 211
Where is George Soros's prosecution? What about Andy Stern of the SEIU (whose group drafts the majority of the Healthcare Bills aimed at Federal Usurpation of Constitutional powers) and Wade Rathke of ACORN and others there (whose organization defrauded voters in some (allegedly 17) states during the 2008 Presidential election? And on and on we can go.
So will the State of South Carolina take on the illegal office holder and his Czars, his so-called board of directors to the neo-Communist-Socialist Oligarchy Government they intend to replace our current Republic with?
No US politician at this time has the patriotism, the guts, and the foundation of all he or she needs to challenge Obama on the merits of his illegality...not because the information isn't there, as my detailed and sourced challenges shortened for only the sake of length prove... but they worry more about themselves than anything else. The TEA party can provide the base of support using informed and rational arguments, and there is enough of an Internet Conservative base to spread the word and grow the movement legally and peacefully, until the goals are met.
That means talking to the world media and creating interest and pressure from without, to legally and peacefully work within the system and make change to move the USA more toward an Originalist Constitutional View of how to conduct Government from within. Smaller Federal Government with less Bureaucracy, a lower tax rate, a removal of pork spending, a demand for better stewardship, a freeze or cuts on federal pay-scales by 30% for the next 10 years, a required amount of time for Representatives to hear from their constituents and their address of grievances before moving ahead with major legislation (up to 30 days), no taxation increases without it being the majority opinion of at least 67% of their constituents, and so on.
South Carolina expects Communist-Socialists like ACORN and the ACLU and also terrorists like in Muslim Synagogues run by Hamas, Hezbollah, etc. in South Carolina to actually "register" as subversives? Are they smoking dope when they write this stuff? Or is it intentionally written against one group that might sue for their rights, and a intentionally gapped legislation to let the Communists and Terrorists to walk free, while punishing the non-Muslim terrorists, non-Communists, non-traitors by making the definitions change or evolve on our watch?
The SC SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES REGISTRATION ACT appears below:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
http://www.scstatehouse.gov/code/t23c029.htm
South Carolina Code of Laws
(Unannotated)
Title 23 - Law Enforcement and Public Safety
CHAPTER 29.
SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES REGISTRATION ACT
SECTION 23-29-10. Short title.
This chapter may be cited as the "Subversive Activities Registration Act."
SECTION 23-29-20. Definitions.
For the purposes of this chapter the following words, phrases and terms are defined as follows:
(1) "Subversive organization" means every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means;
(2) "Organization subject to foreign control" means every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or other organization, composed of two or more persons, which comes within either of the following:
(a) it solicits or accepts financial contributions, loans or support of any kind directly or indirectly from, or is affiliated directly or indirectly with, a foreign government or a political subdivision thereof, an agent, agency or instrumentality of a foreign government or political subdivision thereof, a political party in a foreign country or an international political organization or
(b) its policies, or any of them, are determined by or at the suggestion of, or in collaboration with, a foreign government or political subdivision thereof, an agent, agency or instrumentality of a foreign government or a political subdivision thereof, a political party in a foreign country or an international political organization;
(3) "Foreign agent" means any person whose actions, or any of them, are determined by or at the suggestion of, or in collaboration with, a foreign government or political subdivision thereof, an instrumentality or agency of a foreign government or political subdivision thereof, a political party in a foreign country or an international political organization; and
(4) "Business" includes, but is not limited to, speaking engagements.
SECTION 23-29-30. Effect on freedom of press or speech.
Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to authorize, require or establish censorship or to limit in any way or infringe upon freedom of the press or of speech as guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States and no regulation shall be promulgated hereunder having that effect.
SECTION 23-29-40. Organizations exempt from application of chapter.
The terms of this chapter do not apply to any labor union or religious, fraternal or patriotic organization, society or association, or their members, whose objectives and aims do not contemplate the overthrow of the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means.
SECTION 23-29-50. Registration by subversive and foreign-controlled organizations.
Every subversive organization and organization subject to foreign control shall register with the Secretary of State on forms prescribed by him within thirty days after coming into existence in this State.
SECTION 23-29-60. Registration of members of subversive and foreign-controlled organizations.
Every member of a subversive organization, or an organization subject to foreign control, every foreign agent and every person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means, who resides, transacts any business or attempts to influence political action in this State, shall register with the Secretary of State on the forms and at the times prescribed by him.
SECTION 23-29-70. Forms and schedule for filing information.
Every organization or person coming within the provisions of this chapter shall file with the Secretary of State all information which he may request, on the forms and at the times he may prescribe.
SECTION 23-29-80. Promulgation of rules and regulations.
The Secretary of State may adopt and promulgate any rules and regulations, not inconsistent with the terms of this chapter, which may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter and may alter or repeal such rules and regulations.
SECTION 23-29-90. Penalties.
Any organization or person who violates any of the provisions of this chapter shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by a fine of not more than twenty-five thousand dollars or imprisonment for not more than ten years, or by both fine and imprisonment.
--------------------------------------------------
Are there unfounded fears about this law? Keep in mind that Harold Koh at the State Department demands, along with Obama and executive usurpers (by association), that we be subject to International Law, NOT US CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. An international court could cite South Carolina's Act as a precedent, add stringencies, and apply it to all Americans. In fact, Canada and Mexico are supposed to join the US in being a region under one international governance in the New World Order, and Europe in the past and present does not believe in "free speech" for the majority.
Case in point: Geert Wilders. On trial in early February 2010, and currently, as of 02/08/2010 on going.
http://www.wildersontrial.com/
Geert Wilders was charged with:
1) making collective or group insults of Muslims,
2) inciting hatred or discrimination against Muslims based on their religious beliefs [Read: even if many are violently bloodthirsty alien oppressors and clearly perverse, wanting to subjugate and take over the Netherlands by force and fear],
3) inciting xenophobic hatred and discrimination, especially against Moroccans due to their race.
When the British forcibly entered the homes and took over the American Colonies by acts of legalized violence, thefts, rapes of its subjects under the Stamp Act...and without trial, simply took Colonial citizens and shot them dead, without even asking a single question of them...the colonies eventually took up the gun when the right to free speech and redress their grievances were denied.
The world of violence in the Middle Ages to the Revolutionary War was often horrific. Case in point, what happened to those who were charged with High Treason hundreds of years ago...from which barbarity we Americans refused to imitate?
"THE punishment of high treafon in general is very solemn and terrible."
1. That the offender be drawn to the gallows, and not be carried or walk; though usually a fledge or hurdle is allowed, to preserve the offender from the extreme torment of being dragged on the ground or pavement.
2. That he be hanged by the neck, and then cut down alive.
3. That his entrails (intestines) be taken out, and burned, while he is yet alive.
4. That his head be cut off.
5. That his body be divided into four parts.
6. That his head and quarters be "at the king's dispofal." (disposal)
"THE king may, and often doth, discharge all the punishment, except beheading, especially where any of noble blood are attainted. For, beheading being part of the judgment, that may be executed, though all the rest be omitted by the king's command." -- Blackstone 4.6 at p. 95
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/blackstone_bk4ch6.asp
Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution, 3.28 @1293 citing same
http://www.lonang.com/exlibris/story/sto-328.htm#fn1d ]
Governments and the judges that operate in them ought to exercise common sense (if they have any left) and to be very careful of any regulating of rare and historically unique gift we have of the right to one's own personal opinion and free speech, or the right to redress their grievances. It may take centuries to turn back from such a mess once we have quagmired away from our inalienable rights and liberties given us from G-D. History is a testimony to that fact. They ought not to be legislating unjust back-lash or the shedding of innocent citizen blood for personal political gain as communists and tyrants who want their Government and structural order to break down into anarchy and chaos apparently do. History tells us that the denial of free speech with violent oppressions on a multi-faceted front disallows the release of needed pressures placed upon the masses, and ultimately leads to violence.
That is why the TEA Party is a healthy release. That is why Conservative Talk Radio and any such on Television is a healthy release. That is why Free Speech and the right to hold to one's own opinion, is a healthy release.
We need legal and peaceful ways of resolving issues...and if the facts or history of a group's rhetoric of taking over the world by violence, killing all unbelievers, raping girls of only 6 to 9 years old and calling them wives is inciting hatred...don't get mad at the one crying out the alarm, go after the one's espousing pedophilia and doing it, go after the one's killing for any reason or no reason at all, and then hiding behind "religion" like the backward thinking terrorists that far too many Muslim extremists and fundamentalists are. We have their texts, their hadiths, their regular current video and televised statements all telling us they mean to take over, to kill, and to oppress any who do not submit to their will. So why protect the murderers and imprison the victims in the Netherlands, or anywhere for that matter, who protest?
No comments:
Post a Comment