Welcome! Jesus Christ is my LORD and Savior! Romans 10:9-10,13; John 3:16

[For EU visitors, I do not personally use cookies, but Google or any clickable link (if you choose to click on it) might. This is in compliance with mandatory EU notification]

I am a Natural Born United States Citizen with NO allegiance or citizenship to any nation but my own, and will use this site as a hobby place of sorts to present my own political and religious viewpoints, as a genuine Constitutional Conservative and a genuine Christian Conservative.

Thank you for coming.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Year of our LORD Jesus Christ
2017
-- As of January 20, 2017
A Sigh Of Relief With The Inauguration Of Donald John Trump as President of the United States of America, And Hope For A Prosperous Future For All United States Citizens (we who are a nation called "the melting pot of the world"). We shall be great and exceptionally great again.


Peace and Liberty. Semper Fidelis.









Wednesday, November 22, 2017

Happy Thanksgiving 2017!

Happy Thanksgiving 2017!













First Thanksgiving at Plymouth” 
  above, is that of an oil painting by Jennie A. Brownscombe,    created about A.D. 1914



53 Pilgrims were at the first Thanksgiving.  

 22 were men,
 4 were married women, 
 9 were boys of adolescent age, 
 5 were girls of adolescent age, 
 and the remaining 13 were young children, with no certainty as to their ages be they from months to 10 years of age, and  not all of whose names affirmed their sex.  For example, the names of those 13 smallest children in attendance were called:  
Bartholomew, Mary & Remember Allerton; 
Love & Wrestling Brewster;
Humility Cooper;
Samuel Eaton;
Damaris & Oceanus Hopkins;
Desire Minter;
Richard More;  and
Resolved & Peregrine White.


The first settlement was actually a commune called a Plantation.  Plantation is taken from the Latin and had the meaning of "Paradise", and the new continent began as a place where one could come and set up one's own paradise away from the tyrannies and oppressions of Europe and European tyrannical religious and political systems, and rise or fall by the work of their hands and the live almost wholly off the fruits of their own labors, as part of a joint commune or community, or by their own family or even in and of themselves.  

    In the late 1620s, along with the rise of religious oppression in England, only then did the colonization of America explode with upwards of 1200 and more one-way to America intercontinental passages a year...just less than 8 years later.  

But in 1621, the entire European population of this one lone (in the wilderness) commune rested at 26 adults (age 21 and above), and 27 children who ranged in age from birth to age 19 or 20.  These 26 adults and their children shared a feast of 3 days duration with some 90 Indians of a local tribe with which they had made peace with.  The Pilgrims carried their firearms openly and always had them openly carried and on their person or in less than arm's length reach, always about and handy,  during this entire feast, just in case, and there were no incidents of any hostility whatsoever. 

 In effect, our Second Amendment to the Constitution (effective as of December 15, 1791) 
"...the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
was based in part on a then 170 years before ratification and implementation tradition that goes right back to the first Pilgrims themselves and by example to the very first Thanksgiving itself. 

According to the historical account taken by a co-participant William Bradford, in "Of Plimoth Plantation":

"They begane now to gather in ye small harvest they had, and to fitte up their houses and dwellings against winter, being all well recovered in health & strenght, and had all things in good
plenty; fFor as some were thus imployed in affairs abroad, others were excersised in fishing, aboute codd, & bass, & other fish, of which yey tooke good store, of which every family had their
portion. All ye somer ther was no want. 

And now begane to come in store of foule, as winter approached, of which this place did abound when they came first (but afterward decreased by degrees). And besids water foule, ther was great store of wild Turkies, of which they tooke many, besids venison, &c. Besids, they had about a peck a meale a weeke to a person, or now since  harvest, Indean corn to yt proportion. Which made many afterwards write so largly of their plenty hear to their freinds in England, which were not fained, but true reports."

Fellow co-participant Edward Winslow,  summarized the same event from a different set of eyes and separately wrote:
"...our harvest being gotten in, our governour sent foure men on fowling, that so we might after a speciall manner rejoyce together, after we had gathered the fruits of our labours ; 

they foure in one day killed as much fowle, as with a little helpe beside, served the Company almost a weeke, at which time amongst other Recreations, we exercised our Armes, many of the Indians coming amongst us, and amongst the rest their greatest king Massasoyt, with some ninetie men, whom for three dayes we entertained and feasted, and they went out and killed five Deere, which they brought to the Plantation and bestowed on our Governour, and upon the Captaine and others.

 And although it be not always so plentifull, as it was at this time with us, yet by the goodness of God, we are so farre from want, that we often wish you partakers of our plentie."

In 1623, the first cattle were migrated from Europe, along with goats, on a ship called "Anne".  About this time, perhaps as early as 1622, pigs were also imported to the Americas from Europe as well.  


We are a nation founded and established in FREEDOM  because we were founded and settled through a core belief system of Protestant Christianity.  All other religious belief systems are ALIEN to this core National Faith and National Identity, even though the parasite faith system of the Luciferians known as the Masons have corrupted the political and religious belief systems so that the core foundation is mostly unknown or ignored by most of the current generations now inhabiting the United States of America.  The Supreme Court records are not as yet destroyed, and the fact that this nation was once truly a Protestant Christian nation is a matter of Court record just 125 years ago.  



CHURCH OF THE HOLY TRINITY V. UNITED STATES, 143 U. S. 457 (1892)


Page 143 U.S. 465
...
But, beyond all these matters, no purpose of action against religion can be imputed to any legislation, state or national, because this is a religious people. This is historically true. From the discovery of this continent to the present hour, there is a single voice making this affirmation.

The commission to Christopher Columbus, prior to his sail westward, is from "Ferdinand and Isabella, by the grace of God, King and Queen of Castile," etc., and recites that "it is hoped that by God's assistance some of the continents and islands in the 

Page 143 U. S. 466
ocean will be discovered," etc. 

The first colonial grant, that made to Sir Walter Raleigh in 1584, was from "Elizabeth, by the grace of God, of England, Fraunce and Ireland, Queene, defender of the faith," etc., and the grant authorizing him to enact statutes of the government of the proposed colony provided that "they be not against the true Christian faith nowe professed in the Church of England."

The first charter of Virginia, granted by King James I in 1606, after reciting the application of certain parties for a charter, commenced the grant in these words:
"We, greatly commending, and graciously accepting of, their Desires for the Furtherance of so noble a Work, which may, by the Providence of Almighty God, hereafter tend to the Glory of his Divine Majesty, in propagating of Christian Religion to such People, as yet live in Darkness and miserable Ignorance of the true Knowledge and Worship of God, and may in time bring the Infidels and Savages, living in those parts, to human Civility, and to a settled and quiet government; DO, by these our Letters-Patents, graciously accept of, and agree to, their humble and well intended Desires."

Language of similar import may be found in the subsequent charters of that colony, from the same king, in 1609 and 1611, and the same is true of the various charters granted to the other colonies. In language more or less emphatic is the establishment of the Christian religion declared to be one of the purposes of the grant.

The celebrated compact made by the pilgrims in the Mayflower, 1620, recites:
"Having undertaken for the Glory of God, and Advancement of the Christian Faith, and the Honour of our King and Country, a Voyage to plant the first Colony in the northern Parts of Virginia; Do by these Presents, solemnly and mutually, in the Presence of God and one another, covenant and combine ourselves together into a civil Body Politick, for our better Ordering and Preservation, and Furtherance of the Ends aforesaid."

The fundamental orders of Connecticut, under which a provisional government was instituted in 1638-39, commence with this declaration:
"Forasmuch as it hath pleased the Allmighty God by the wise disposition of his diuyne pruidence

Page 143 U. S. 467
so to Order and dispose of things that we the Inhabitants and Residents of Windsor, Hartford, and Wethersfield are now cohabiting and dwelling in and vppon the River of Conectecotte and the Lands thereunto adioyneing; And well knowing where a people are gathered togather the word of God requires that to mayntayne the peace and vnion of such a people there should be an orderly and decent Gouerment established according to God, to order and dispose of the affayres of the people at all seasons as occation shall require; doe therefore assotiate and conioyne our selues to be as one Publike state or Comonwelth, and doe, for our selues and our Successors and such as shall be adioyned to vs att any tyme hereafter, 

enter into Combination and Confederation togather, 

to mayntayne and presearue the liberty and purity of the gospell of our Lord Jesus weh we now prfesse, as also the disciplyne of the Churches, weh according to the truth of the said gospell is now practiced amongst vs."

In the charter of privileges granted by William Penn to the province of Pennsylvania, in 1701, it is recited:
"Because no People can be truly happy, though under the greatest Enjoyment of Civil Liberties, if abridged of the Freedom of their Consciences, as to their Religious Profession and Worship; And Almighty God being the only Lord of Conscience, Father of Lights and Spirits, and the Author as well as Object of all divine Knowledge, Faith, and Worship, who only doth enlighten the Minds, and persuade and convince the Understandings of People, I do hereby grant and declare,"
etc.

Coming nearer to the present time, the declaration of independence recognizes the presence of the Divine in human affairs in these words:
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that thet are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. . . . We therefore the Representatives of the united states of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name and by Authority of the good these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare,"
etc.;

"And for the 

Page 143 U. S. 468
support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the Protection of Divine Providence, 

    [Divine Providence simply means "GOD who foreknows /foresees, directs, provides for and takes care of".  It is the confession of GOD as a Being directly and though unseen, being involved in the affairs of men...to the good of those who love GOD, to the hurt of those who don't by a withdrawal of His support / provision/protection.  -- Brianroy]

 we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor."

If we examine the constitutions of the various states, we find in them a constant recognition of religious obligations. Every Constitution of every one of the forty-four states 

[Remember, this decision by the US Supreme Court is written in 1892, almost 126 years after the Declaration of Independence, and going on 271 years after the first Thanksgiving of 1621.  -- Brianroy]

contains language which, either directly or by clear implication, recognizes a profound reverence for religion, and an assumption that its influence in all human affairs is essential to the wellbeing of the community.

This recognition may be in the preamble, such as is found in the Constitution of Illinois, 1870:
"We, the people of the State of Illinois, grateful to Almighty God for the civil, political, and religious liberty which He hath so long permitted us to enjoy, and looking to Him for a blessing upon our endeavors to secure and transmit the same unimpaired to succeeding generations,"
etc.

It may be only in the familiar requisition that all officers shall take an oath closing with the declaration, "so help me God." 

It may be in clauses like that of the Constitution of Indiana, 1816, Art. XI, section 4:  
"The manner of administering an oath or affirmation shall be such as is most consistent with the conscience of the deponent, and shall be esteemed the most solemn appeal to God."

Or in provisions such as are found in Articles 36 and 37 of the declaration of rights of the Constitution of Maryland, 1867:
"That, as it is the duty of every man to worship God in such manner as he thinks most acceptable to Him, all persons are equally entitled to protection in their religious liberty, wherefore no person ought, by any law, to be molested in his person or estate on account of his religious persuasion or profession, or for his religious practice, unless, under the color of religion, he shall disturb the good order, peace, or safety of the state, or shall infringe the laws of morality, or injure others in their natural, civil, or religious rights; nor ought any person to be compelled to frequent or maintain or contribute, unless on contract, to maintain any place of worship or any ministry; nor shall any person, otherwise competent, be deemed incompetent as a witness or juror on account of his religious belief, provided he 

Page 143 U. S. 469
believes in the existence of God, 

[Note that the Court deems Atheists as generally incompetent witnesses and jurors by this decision.  Something that should have been pressed in later cases, but to my knowledge never used, though it should have been.  -- Brianroy] 

and that, under his dispensation, such person will be held morally accountable for his acts, and be rewarded or punished therefor, either in this world or the world to come. That no religious test ought ever to be required as a qualification for any office of profit or trust in this state, other than a declaration of belief in the existence of God; nor shall the legislature prescribe any other oath of office than the oath prescribed by this constitution."

Or like that in Articles 2 and 3 of part 1st of the Constitution of Massachusetts, 1780:
"It is the right as well as the duty of all men in society publicly, and at stated seasons, to worship the Supreme Being, the great Creator and Preserver of the universe. . . . As the happiness of a people and the good order and preservation of civil government essentially depend upon piety, religion, and morality, and as these cannot be generally diffused through a community but by the institution of the public worship of God and of public instructions in piety, religion, and morality, therefore, to promote their happiness, and to secure the good order and preservation of their government, the people of this commonwealth have a right to invest their legislature with power to authorize and require, and the legislature shall, from time to time, authorize and require, the several towns, parishes, precincts, and other bodies politic or religious societies to make suitable provision at their own expense, for the institution of the public worship of God and for the support and maintenance of public Protestant teachers of piety, religion, and morality, in all cases where such provision shall not be made voluntarily."

Or, as in sections 5 and 14 of Article 7 of the Constitution of Mississippi, 1832:
"No person who denies the being of a God, or a future state of rewards and punishments, shall hold any office in the civil department of this state. . . . Religion morality, and knowledge being necessary to good government, the preservation of liberty, and the happiness of mankind, schools, and the means of education, shall forever be encouraged in this state."

Or by Article 22 of the Constitution of Delaware, (1776), which required all officers, besides an oath of allegiance, to make and subscribe the following declaration:
"I, A. B., do profess 

Page 143 U. S. 470
faith in God the Father, and in Jesus Christ His only Son, and in the Holy Ghost, one God, blessed for evermore, and I do acknowledge the Holy Scriptures of the Old and New Testament to be given by divine inspiration."

Even the Constitution of the United States, which is supposed to have little touch upon the private life of the individual, contains in the First Amendment a declaration common to the constitutions of all the states, as follows: "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof," etc., and also provides in Article I, Section 7, a provision common to many constitutions, that the executive shall have ten days (Sundays excepted) within which to determine whether he will approve or veto a bill.

There is no dissonance in these declarations. There is a universal language pervading them all, having one meaning. They affirm and reaffirm that this is a religious nation. These are not individual sayings, declarations of private persons. They are organic utterances. They speak the voice of the entire people.

While, because of a general recognition of this truth, the question has seldom been presented to the courts, yet we find that in Updegraph v. Commonwealth, 11 S. & R. 394, 400, it was decided that
"Christianity, general Christianity, is, and always has been, a part of the common law of Pennsylvania; . . . not Christianity with an established church and tithes and spiritual courts, but Christianity with liberty of conscience to all men."

And in People v. Ruggles, 8 Johns. 290, 294-295, Chancellor Kent, the great commentator on American law, speaking as Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of New York, said:
"The people of this state, in common with the people of this country, profess the general doctrines of Christianity as the rule of their faith and practice, and to scandalize the author of these doctrines is not only, in a religious point of view, extremely impious, but, even in respect to the obligations due to society, is a gross violation of decency and good order. . . . The free, equal, and undisturbed enjoyment of religious opinion, whatever it may be, and free and decent discussions on any religious 

Page 143 U. S. 471
subject, is granted and secured; but to revile, with malicious and blasphemous contempt, the religion professed by almost the whole community is an abuse of that right. 

Nor are we bound by any expressions in the Constitution, as some have strangely supposed, either not to punish at all, or to punish indiscriminately the like attacks upon the religion
of Mahomet or of the Grand Lama, 
and for this plain reason, that the case assumes that we are a Christian people, and the morality of the country is deeply engrafted upon Christianity, and not upon the doctrines or worship of those impostors."

And in the famous case of Vidal v. Girard's Executors, 2 How. 127, 43 U. S. 198, this Court, while sustaining the will of Mr. Girard, with its provision for the creation of a college into which no minister should be permitted to enter, observed: 
"It is also said, and truly, that the Christian religion is a part of the common law of Pennsylvania."

If we pass beyond these matters to a view of American life, as expressed by its laws, its business, its customs, and its society, we find every where a clear recognition of the same truth. Among other matters, note the following: the form of oath universally prevailing, concluding with an appeal to the Almighty; the custom of opening sessions of all deliberative bodies and most conventions with prayer; the prefatory words of all wills, "In the name of God, amen;"

the laws respecting the observance of the Sabbath, with the general cessation of all secular business, and the closing of courts, legislatures, and other similar public assemblies on that day; the churches and church organizations which abound in every city, town, and hamlet; the multitude of  charitable organizations existing every where under Christian auspices; the gigantic missionary associations, with general support, and aiming to establish Christian missions in every quarter of the globe. These, and many other matters which might be noticed, add a volume of unofficial declarations to the mass of organic utterances that this is a Christian nation.   ...."


To which I say, Amen.  Let us return to our true National Religious Heritage, and truly give thanks to GOD the Father through the name of His Son, Jesus Christ.  











Protestant Christianity is the TRUE NATIONAL HERITAGE and Religion of the United States of America that its people need to return to, and/or come to.  -- That's my input.  

Happy Thanksgiving.  

Wednesday, November 15, 2017

The Las Vegas massacre of October 1, 2017? Was It a Saudi Paid For Contract Terror Attack By Saudi Prince Talal Using Diplomatic Immunity Saudis As Shooters and U.S. Intelligence For Logistic Support?


This is an update addendum to my post of 
Thursday, October 19, 2017
"Las Vegas October 1, 2017 Massacre by Multiple Shooters and Multiple U.S. Intelligence Agencies Against WE THE PEOPLE As A Joint Exercise In Murder? Almost Transparently So."  
http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2017/10/las-vegas-october-1-2017-massacre-by.html

Note:   The following is an opinion by me and editorial conclusion by me.  -- Thanks.    Brianroy

It now appears that the primary killing action was done as a Saudi Prince contract (probably unknown to the King of Saudi Arabia, and certainly not sanctioned by him) and  there are indications that update us to the likelihood that the only real correction to the previous analysis less than 3 weeks after the event, is that the Las Vegas active shooters themselves were likely NOT U.S. Intelligence, unless they were dual U.S.-Saudi  Intel agents, and likely those who specifically had Saudi Diplomatic Immunity while active shooters and are so protected by that status.  It is a reasonable, but UNCONFIRMED allegation and an UNCONFIRMED conclusion at this point.  



During the October 1, 2017 Las Vegas Massacre, while I count at least 9 or 10 likely different shooters present, on the ff. video, it lists at minimum there were at least seven different shooters 






See also:


















It appears that in direct connection to this Las Vegas terrorist incident of October 1, 2017, but as yet not publicly affirmed, it was NOT just a coincidence that there was a Saudi Royal Family arrest spree by their king, and it was NO COINCIDENCE that Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal was among a number of Saudis that were arrested in Saudi Arabia, and their assets frozen, 



allegedly it seems, in connection with the Saudi King's own internal AND diplomatic response to the USA regarding Saudi involvement, allegedly, with the October 1, 2017  Las Vegas massacre of 58 U.S. Citizens, and murders of various more witnesses challenging the lone nut fiction with their clear counter-testimonials that seemed to seriously threaten the CIA contract public relations contrived  pseudo-narrative of the lone shooter.   

It is MORE than just a coincidence that at Mandalay Bay, where Saudi Prince Talal literally OWNED 5 floors of the Mandalay Bay that the patsy murderer was killed



and it is MORE than just coincidence that it was at the Mandalay Bay by alleged reputation that allegedly those who worked directly for Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal allegedly engaged in international arms deals, and various forms of espionage and terrorist activities that included liaisons with the CIA, but that he apparently was also involved DIRECTLY with known anti-America and to the subversion and overthrow of America agenda Islamic terrorist activity by a group of alleged to be Saudi SHOOTERS, ALL of whom had DIPLOMATIC IMMUNITY on the night of October 1, 2017, who allegedly murdered United States Citizens, and allegedly got a free ride home on an aircraft allegedly owned by  Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal himself.  

There is also the presence of those Saudi Intelligence Officers who worked under the SAUDI company called ETS Managagement as part of their "employee" cover that very same night in Vegas.  But because of non-disclosure clauses, the U.S. Intelligence Community refuses to talk about it, except for one who leaked the factual data out.  

When the United States illegally went to war in Libya, Saudi Arabia's ETS Management team of Saudi Intelligence Officers were also on the ground there, again, allegedly helping conduct violent subversive warfare there as well.  Whoever the actual shooters were, two things seem apparent: alleged Saudi Diplomatic Immunity, and alleged deep ties and protection to the Saudi Royal Family through Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal.  


The specific identities of these Saudi Mass murderers (be they the alleged ETS Management or other of Saudi Intelligence with Diplomatic Immunity), the specific identities of these men are allegedly known to a select group within the high echelons of our United States Federal Government that is allegedly something to the effect of less than 40 people within the Federal Government, and generally known by hundreds more, allegedly including POTUS Trump, Vice President Pence, and White House Chief of Staff General Kelly.  

 The allegation is as yet unconfirmed, but it appears to be true, and indeed clearly appears to be the case of why the news blackout and FBI acting like a cross between buffoon Keystone Cops and paid off Saudi compromised United Nations allegiance Police State forces, rather than those having ANY obligation to protect United States Citizens or maintain their oath to the United States Constitution.  

The corruption inside the Federal Bureau of Investigation gets worse, as the FBI directs an exclusive list of Las Vegas shooting victims to join a class action by their own hand selected Las Vegas / Los Angeles Law Firm who clearly are allegedly working as double agents for the behest of the FBI and the Saudis against the victims themselves.  http://rootforamerica.com/story-shocking-fbi-scandal/

Says Root in one of his Vegas Insight commentaries regarding the MGM CEO who effectually made MGM fertile ground for Islamist Terror to even migrate to Vegas through Mandalay even BEFORE the event could even be conceived to happen by Root until he saw it weeks later :
"MGM CEO Jim Murren...hitching MGM’s wagon to a front group for Hamas.
...giving millions of dollars to CAIR- an organization tied to Hamas and the Muslim Brotherhood. Really? "  -- W. A. Root on August 31, 2017







   
It is NOT enough for a bunch of Saudis to merely be arrested, if they are indeed the guilty parties.  The TRUTH must be made manifest to the world, and these men who were directly the Vegas shooters and those who gave the order,whoever they are, be they including Saudi Prince Al-Waleed bin Talal himself, if he gave the order or even merely financed the operation,  should damn well be publicly outed for roles in specifics and details, and then executed.  And it should be done quickly in a matter of days or weeks, certainly before the end of 2017.  Nothing less the full penalty and public outing of what they did, if these specific people indeed are responsible, will suffice.  










[[[[Update November 21, 2017:  

More Video -

23 minute video with many witnesses mentioning the Helicopters at Vegas...You know, the ones that included a machine gun strafing the crowds below






Shepard Ambellas of Intellihub lays out the helicopter proof 


in this ff. video:





And also please check out and save a copy of Niall Bradley of Soft.net's October 21, 2017 assessment MUST READ AND SAVE article
Las Vegas Terror Attack: Clear Evidence of Multiple Shooters at Multiple Hotels



End of November 21, 2017 update]]]]

Tuesday, October 31, 2017

Important Quotes From Karl Marx's Communist Manifesto That Drives The Muslim Migration Of Europe, George Soros, And DNC / DSA Members Of U.S. Congress


By understanding the central themes of these quotes of Karl Marx, you will see the internal philosophy motivation and drive of George Soros – Communist, AntiFa – Communists, Democratic Socialist of America members in the U.S. Congress – Communists, et cetera.  


The Communist Manifesto     Quotes of Karl Marx’s Thesis



 Chapter II. Proletarians and Communists

The distinguishing feature of Communism is not the abolition of property generally, but the abolition of bourgeois [employers who offer wage labor employment]  property.

…We Communists have been reproached with the desire of abolishing the right of personally acquiring property as the fruit of a man’s own labour, which property is alleged to be the groundwork of all personal freedom, activity and independence.
Hard-won, self-acquired, self-earned property! 

…To be a capitalist, is to have not only a purely personal, but a social status in production. Capital is a collective product, and only by the united action of many members, nay, in the last resort, only by the united action of all members of society, can it be set in motion.
Capital is therefore not only personal; it is a social power.
…And the abolition of this state of things is called by the bourgeois [employers who offer wage labor employment],   abolition of individuality and freedom! And rightly so. The abolition of … individuality, … independence, and … freedom is undoubtedly aimed at.

Abolition [Aufhebung] of the family! Even the most radical flare up at this infamous proposal of the Communists.
On what foundation is the present family, the bourgeois [employer’s] family, based? 
… to stop the exploitation of children by their parents…we replace home education by social.

…The bourgeois [employer] clap-trap about the family and education, about the hallowed co-relation of parents and child…. 

[In effect, what Karl Marx is saying, is that True Communists hate families, they are dysfunctional and psychologically and emotionally scarred and bitter people who envy others any goodness in their lives.  To them, they enviously hate and wish to destroy any holy and fully respectful and non-sexual loving parent child relations as GOD intended, and any true rearing and educating of parent to child as is part of the Natural Design, because if they could not have that healthy relationship from their infancy up, in their hatred and theme of life retaliation of revolution and very often aimless devotion to lashing out fits of violence and their insane love of death and destruction, no one else should ever even have the chance to have a decent and holy and loving upbringing that they never had either. -- Brianroy]

The Communists are further reproached with desiring to abolish countries and nationality.
The working men have no country. 
…it will be said, …”Communism abolishes eternal truths, it abolishes all religion, and all morality, instead of constituting them on a new basis; it therefore acts in contradiction to all past historical experience.”

…Nevertheless, in most advanced countries, the following will be pretty generally applicable.
1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes. 
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax.
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance.
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels.
5. Centralisation of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with State capital and an exclusive monopoly.
6. Centralisation of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the State.
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the State; the bringing into cultivation of waste-lands, and the improvement of the soil generally in accordance with a common plan.
8. Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture.
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country. 

[This is population distribution, not just over any one country, but over an entire continent, and is the driving philosophy from ethnic and culturally suicidal elites who are forcing Europe into its own collapse and destruction and genocide by shipping in and openly forcing tolerance to many millions of barbarian Muslims who come in to rape, gorge on welfare support at native expense, to dispossess even property and residence, to disregard all laws, et cetera.  It is merely the implementation of a COMMUNIST driven ideology with severely destructive consequences both now and in generations to come.  And as long as Communists destroy the masses, they LOVE it.  They are not allowed to be called murders and criminals themselves, because to them, we are not allowed a moral plane to judge them from.  But oh, if we do any small thing to them, even to say a wrong word to hurt their feelings, they wail about it worse than the families they cause to have raped or murdered, as if it were even a worse crime than they commit themselves.  Be wary of that, and have no pity for the Communist who practices and implements Marx’s manifesto.  None.  ]



10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labour in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production, &c, &c.



Chapter III. Socialist and Communist Literature

 …Socialist and Communist publications contain also a critical element. They attack every principle of existing society. Hence, they are full of the most valuable materials for the enlightenment of the working class. The practical measures proposed in them — such as the abolition of the distinction between town and country, of the family, of the carrying on of industries for the account of private individuals, and of the wage system…are recognised in their earliest indistinct and undefined forms only. These proposals, therefore, are of a purely Utopian character.



Chapter IV. Position of the Communists in Relation to the Various Existing Opposition Parties

The Communists fight for the attainment of the immediate aims…But they never cease, for a single instant, to instill into the working class the clearest possible recognition of the hostile antagonism…In short, the Communists everywhere support every revolutionary movement against the existing social and political order of things.
In all these movements, they bring to the front, as the leading question in each, the property question, no matter what its degree of development at the time.
…The Communists disdain to conceal their views and aims. They openly declare that their ends can be attained only by the forcible overthrow of all existing social conditions.



Friday, October 27, 2017

500 Year Anniversary of Martin Luther's 95 Theses Is On October 31, 2017

Do you know the significance of THIS October 31, 2017?  You should.  In many ways the great thinkers and reformers of both Christianity and Politics in the last 500 years can find a primary catalyst that enabled their freedom of expression through the beginning act of what gave us the Protestant Reformation of the modern era.  It is called REFORMATION DAY, and on October 31, 1517, 500 years ago, a University Professor and Priest, Martin Luther, on the same day tacked up his 95 Theses upon the doors of several churches at Wittenburg Germany (including All Saints Church) and notified the Archbishop of these same grievances in which the Pope and his emissaries to sell indulgences to raise money (to build what we now call the Vatican's St. Peter's basilica)  completely violated the Holy Scriptures. 

 It is only because of Protestant Christianity, a Protestant Christianity we recognize as truly launched with the posting and delivering of the 95 Theses of Martin Luther on October 31, 2017, 500 years ago, that we have come to as a result, enjoy so many of the freedoms and liberties in the world today.  It is Christ Jesus and the knowledge and free sharing of the Holy Scriptures that sets men free, and the good fruits of that are easily seen for those that have eyes to see, and a brain that can cognitively discern what even those who were America's Enlightened Founders knew in their day. 


"Without Freedom Of Thought,
                There Can Be No Such Thing
                As Wisdom,
                And No Such Thing As Publick Liberty
               Without Freedom Of Speech."

                          -- Benjamin Franklin,

In 1892, even the Supreme Court of the United States recognized that this nation at that time was indeed a CHRISTIAN nation generally, and it was evident by the liberating Christian Influence upon our laws and business and manners and customs, or words to this effect.  See:
CHURCH OF THE HOLY TRINITY V. UNITED STATES, 143 U. S. 457 (1892) pp. 465-471

The Protestant Christian Reformation truly accelerated the era known as the "Renaissance", and it was Protestant Christianity, despite religious and political corruption of an Inquisition that would last 605 years, from 1203 to 1808 A.D., Protestant Christianity alone can be cited as the foundation of liberating laws of governance and thought in the Western Nations, especially that group that colonized and then created the United States of America through the freedoms and religious liberties that Protestant Christianity alone allowed and encouraged and nurtured. 

In 1203, Pope Innocent III persecuted pre-Luther Protestants of Paulicians and especially directed the armies of the Crusades to mass murder and exterminate the culturally and politically far superior Albigenses sect of them in France for Heresy in believing Scriptures and the Word of GOD over Pope Innocent III himself in Rome.  The Albigenses dared follow the teachings of the Apostle Paul and to be literate in his letters and teachings, and to Pope Innocent III, only sanctioned leaders and direct subordinates ordained within Roman Catholicism were allowed to know the actual contents of the Scriptures, as with-holding power kept the common folk superstitious, and any lies and manipulations made by his representatives on any issue or occasion could NOT be challenged and immediate OBEDIENCE could be so demanded at the cost of eternal damnation for the slightest offense, even though entirely a lie to do so.

It appears that Pope Innocent III had for his inquisition (dis-propertying, torturing, and the killing of those who are the TRUE Christians) inspiration, Emperor Diocletian, an Eastern Roman Empire Emperor who reigned some 900 years before Innocent III’s time of beginning his own Inquisition from Rome.

 From about 303 to 311 A.D., the Emperor Diocletian and his co-regent, Galerius, persecuted those who were true Christians, ordering all copies of the Christian Scriptures to be burned, and to effectually call these as divested of most of the very rights of citizenship, while persecuting them, removing them from all forms of civil government, and compelling them to offer incense to the Greco-Roman deities or be executed; often on the spot.  The history of Roman Catholicism from its rise to power in the 600s A.D. to its obsession with totalitarian megalomania under Pope Innocent III and beyond, was all about depriving the people of the Word of GOD, and wielding its knowledge as if an occultism of political empowerment and mystique and superstitious fear enabled dominance that would make it a one day rule all the known world power.   And in case you think any reference to Innocent III is irrelevant here, then check out the plaque of Innocent III as a name revered now in Congress, located since 1950 in the House of Representatives ...
...and is listed as one of 23 men who a post 1950 Congress is to view as an influence as they make and consider laws.  Had the Architect of the Capitol attempted to include not just Innocent III, but even some several of the other of the 23 names present in 1850 instead of 1950, he would have been beaten and perhaps even shot by the then 1850 members of Congress, and severely rebuked in public articles by scholars and statesmen alike who would have demonstrated that some of these were NOT in anyway direct nor beneficial influences upon our Constitutional Republic at all, but political perversions and unwelcome alien bought and paid for historical revisionisms.

Perhaps some of the readers would be advised to look at the names and faces upon the plaques that Congress is advised to emulate and imitate as placed over their doors to the assembly of the United States House of Representatives. 

Pope Innocent III:
‘We may according to the fulness of our power, dispose of the law and dispense above the law. Those whom the Pope of Rome doth separate, it is not a man that separates them but God. For the Pope holdeth place on earth, not simply of a man but of the true God.’
 I Book of Gregory 9 Decret. C3.

And this man is offered to Congress as a man to imitate and be an example as a good law-giver by the architect of the Capitol in 1950 and beyond?  Good grief...that really is a TRICK and certainly NOT a treat for WE THE PEOPLE.  Roman Catholicism had nothing to do with founding this nation, but they did subvert Masonry and a few of the Founders by continued associations after the fact, making true headway only when it was years  AFTER the Bill of Rights was ratified (as I understand it...).

There will certainly be a natural animosity of those who would even dare to follow the New Testament writings of the Apostle Paul as the Word of GOD over any Pope, or bishop or anyone else, the same as has been done since the second half of the first century, and even in Rome in revolt to Victor, the 13th Bishop of Rome (later mis-titled and relabeled a pope) by example.  Rome had its own first Protestant Reformation without a schism in the last two decades of the second century.  That was not the case many centuries later. Especially from the 9th Century on.  And example of the animosity to those who dared even have a tradition and claim to early Christianity through the Apostle Paul, 30 years before Martin Luther's 95 Theses,  in 1487, Pope Innocent VIII, envious that a group of Pauline Christians had faithfully thrived in rich apostolic tradition since the times of the Apostles themselves, utilized the promise of indulgences to mob armies to war against the Vaudois in the Piedmont Valley and other mountain Valleys of northern Italy, and kill off all the males and rape and then kill most all the women.

It was Rome's position from 1203 to pretty much the early 1600s that should any Roman Catholic even disagree that a Roman Catholic labeled heretic be put to death, in the eyes of Roman Catholicism, he or she was cut off, and as far as they in Rome were concerned, there was no salvation available for them, ever.  However, with the publishing of Erasmus' New Testament in Greek in 1516 -- being possessed by Martin Luther in 1517 as he wrote his own archbishop and publicly posted his 95 theses in Wittenburg, most notably at the door of the All Saints Church (as well as other Catholic Churches in Wittenburg) on October 31, 1517 -- the power of the printed Word of GOD in the hands of the believer was the TRUE Reformer of the Church of Jesus Christ, and the founding catalyst that gave the world Protestant Christianity, the Age of Enlightenment, and even the United States of America's Declaration of Independence and Bill of Rights.  In Germany, you will notice that the statues of Roman Catholic Churches have statues with priests that silently stand as a type of testimony to Martin Luther.  Before Martin Luther, the statues of the priests have the Bibles with the pages of the Scriptures always hidden from the people.  After Martin Luther, the statues in order to keep congregations began only after that period to have the bible pages face out so that the people might know it was now available to them...when before a copy of the Scriptures in Latin, or Greek, and especially your own language would be a pre-Luther death sentence, and your own bible pages used to light the faggots as you burned at the stake like John Hus. 

When reading the 95 theses, one should be especially aware of the 6th Chapter of Romans and Paul's teaching of Justification by Faith into Jesus Christ alone and what He did at the Cross, that it is Faith into Christ Jesus alone that saves.  The Roman Catholic Church and a man playing "pope" by this or that word or decree (be it spoken or written) means nothing as it regards the salvation of the human soul. 


So if anyone wishes to celebrate the true Hollowed Evening, then let us do away with Halloween that promotes Satanism and death, and one person or one family at a time, let us instead celebrate our Freedom in Christ Jesus and now recognize October 31 as  REFORMATION DAY, and ask people to share the 95 theses of Martin Luther, and the blessings that Protestant Christianity has brought to the world in the influence to freedom and liberty in those who most promote its counsel in Government and among the people at the times those enlightened ones did so.  Congress once ordained a Bible issued to every school in America (when we were but 3,000,000 plus) in the 1790s.  In our own day, one person or one family at a time,  let's get back to our nation's Founding Principles and the Holy Bible these Founding Fathers all read and were guided by, and many like Benjamin Rush had University and other public Bible Studies by.   



The 95 Theses Martin Luther both Tacked up to Churches In Wittenburg Germany and also sent to his Archbishop on October 31, 1517 

Out of love for the truth and from desire to elucidate it, the Reverend Father Martin Luther, Master of Arts and Sacred Theology, and ordinary lecturer therein at Wittenberg, intends to defend the following statements and to dispute on them in that place. Therefore he asks that those who cannot be present and dispute with him orally shall do so in their absence by letter. In the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, Amen.
1. Our Lord and Master Jesus Christ, in saying, "Repent ye, etc.," intended that the whole life of his believers on earth should be a constant penance.
2. And the word "penance" neither can, nor may, be understood as referring to the Sacrament of Penance, that is, to confession and atonement as exercised under the priest's ministry.
3. Nevertheless He does not think of inward penance only: rather is inward penance worthless unless it produces various outward mortifications of the flesh.
4. Therefore mortification continues as long as hatred of oneself continues, that is to say, true inward penance lasts until entrance into the Kingdom of Heaven.
5. The Pope will not, and cannot, remit other punishments than those which he has imposed by his own decree or according to the canons.
6. The Pope can forgive sins only in the sense, that he declares and confirms what may be forgiven of God; or that he doth it in those cases which he hath reserved to himself; be this contemned, the sin remains unremitted.
7. God forgives none his sin without at the same time casting him penitent and humbled before the priest His vicar.
8. The canons concerning penance are imposed only on the living; they ought not by any means, following the same canons, to be imposed on the dying.
9. Therefore, the Holy Spirit, acting in the Pope, does well for us, when the latter in his decrees entirely removes the article of death and extreme necessity.
10. Those priests act unreasonably and ill who reserve for Purgatory the penance imposed on the dying.
11. This abuse of changing canonical penalty into the penalty of Purgatory seems to have arisen when the bishops were asleep.
12. In times of yore, canonical penalties were imposed, not after, but before, absolution, as tests of true repentance and affliction.
13. The dying pay all penalties by their death, are already dead to the canons, and rightly have exemption from them.
14. Imperfect spiritual health or love in the dying person necessarily brings with it great fear; and the less this love is, the greater the fear it brings.
15. This fear and horror - to say nothing of other things - are sufficient in themselves to produce the punishment of Purgatory, because they approximate to the horror of despair.
16. Hell, Purgatory, and Heaven seem to differ as perfect despair, imperfect despair, and security of salvation differ.
17. It seems as must in Purgatory love in the souls increase, as fear diminishes in them.
18. It does not seem to be proved either by arguments or by the Holy Writ that they are outside the state of merit and demerit, or increase of love.
19. This, too, seems not to be proved, that they are all sure and confident of their salvation, though we may be quite sure of it.
20. Therefore the Pope, in speaking of the perfect remission of all punishments, does not mean that all penalties in general be forgiven, but only those imposed by himself.
21. Therefore, those preachers of indulgences err who say that, by the Pope's indulgence, a man may be exempt from all punishments, and be saved.
22. Yea, the Pope remits the souls in Purgatory no penalty which they, according to the canons, would have had to pay in this life.
23. If to anybody complete remission of all penalties may be granted, it is certain that it is granted only to those most approaching perfection, that is, to very few.
24. Therefore the multitude is misled by the boastful promise of the paid penalty, whereby no manner of distinction is made.
25. The same power that the Pope has over Purgatory, such has also every bishop in his diocese, and every curate in his parish.
26. The Pope acts most rightly in granting remission to souls, not by the power of the keys - which in Purgatory he does not possess - but by way of intercession.
27. They preach vanity who say that the soul flies out of Purgatory as soon as the money thrown into the chest rattles.
28. What is sure, is, that as soon as the penny rattles in the chest, gain and avarice are on the way of increase; but the intercession of the church depends only on the will of God Himself.
29. And who knows, too, whether all those souls in Purgatory wish to be redeemed, as it is said to have happened with St. Severinus and St. Paschalis.
30. Nobody is sure of having repented sincerely enough; much less can he be sure of having received perfect remission of sins.
31. Seldom even as he who has sincere repentance, is he who really gains indulgence; that is to say, most seldom to be found.
32. On the way to eternal damnation are they and their teachers, who believe that they are sure of their salvation through indulgences.
33. Beware well of those who say, the Pope's pardons are that inestimable gift of God by which man is reconciled to God.
34. For the forgiveness contained in these pardons has reference only to the penalties of sacramental atonement which were appointed by men.
35. He preaches like a heathen who teaches that those who will deliver souls out of Purgatory or buy indulgences do not need repentance and contrition.
36. Every Christian who feels sincere repentance and woe on account of his sins, has perfect remission of pain and guilt even without letters of indulgence.
37. Every true Christian, be he still alive or already dead, partaketh in all benefits of Christ and of the Church given him by God, even without letters of indulgence.
38. Yet is the Pope's absolution and dispensation by no means to be contemned, since it is, as I have said, a declaration of the Divine Absolution.
39. It is exceedingly difficult, even for the most subtle theologists, to praise at the same time before the people the great wealth of indulgence and the truth of utter contrition.
40. True repentance and contrition seek and love punishment; while rich indulgence absolves from it, and causes men to hate it, or at least gives them occasion to do so.

41. The Pope's indulgence ought to be proclaimed with all precaution, lest the people should mistakenly believe it of more value than all other works of charity.
42. Christians should be taught, it is not the Pope's opinion that the buying of indulgence is in any way comparable to works of charity.
43. Christians should be taught, he who gives to the poor, or lends to a needy man, does better than buying indulgence.
44. For, by the exercise of charity, charity increases and man grows better, while by means of indulgence, he does not become better, but only freer from punishment.

45. Christians should be taught, he who sees his neighbor in distress, and, nevertheless, buys indulgence, is not partaking in the Pope's pardons, but in the anger of God.
46. Christians should be taught, unless they are rich enough, it is their duty to keep what is necessary for the use of their households, and by no means to throw it away on indulgences.
47. Christians should be taught, the buying of indulgences is optional and not commanded.
48. Christians should be taught, the Pope, in selling pardons, has more want and more desire of a devout prayer for himself than of the money.

49. Christians should be taught, the Pope's pardons are useful as far as one does not put confidence in them, but on the contrary most dangerous, if through them one loses the fear of God.
50. Christians should be taught, if the Pope knew the ways and doings of the preachers of indulgences, he would prefer that St. Peter's Minster should be burnt to ashes, rather than that it should be built up of the skin, flesh, and bones of his lambs.
51. Christians should be taught, the Pope, as it is his bounden duty to do, is indeed also willing to give of his own money - and should St. Peter's be sold thereto - to those from whom the preachers of indulgences do most extort money.
52. It is a vain and false thing to hope to be saved through indulgences, though the commissary - nay, the Pope himself - was to pledge his own soul therefore.

53. Those who, on account of a sermon concerning indulgences in one church, condemn the word of God to silence in the others, are enemies of Christ and of the Pope.
54. Wrong is done to the word of God if one in the same sermon spends as much or more time on indulgences as on the word of the Gospel.
55. The opinion of the Pope cannot be otherwise than this:- If an indulgence - which is the lowest thing - be celebrated with one bell, one procession and ceremonies, then the Gospel - which is the highest thing - must be celebrated with a hundred bells, a hundred processions, and a hundred ceremonies.
56. The treasures of the Church, whence the Pope grants his dispensation are neither sufficiently named nor known among the community of Christ.

57. It is manifest that they are not temporal treasures, for the latter are not lightly spent, but rather gathered by many of the preachers.
58. Nor are they the merits of Christ and of the saints, for these, without the Pope's aid, work always grace to the inner man, cross, death, and hell to the other man.
59. St. Lawrence called the poor of the community the treasures of the community and of the Church, but he understood the word according to the use in his time.
60. We affirm without pertness that the keys of the Church, bestowed through the merit of Christ, are this treasure.

61. For it is clear that the Pope's power is sufficient for the remission of penalties and forgiveness in the reserved cases.
62. The right and true treasure of the Church is the most Holy Gospel of the glory and grace of God.
63. This treasure, however, is deservedly most hateful, for it makes the first to be last.
64. While the treasure of indulgence is deservedly most agreeable, for it makes the last to be first.
65. Therefore, the treasures of the Gospel are nets, with which, in times of yore, one fished for the men of Mammon.
66. But the treasures of indulgence are nets, with which now-a-days one fishes for the Mammon of men.
67. Those indulgences, which the preachers proclaim to be great mercies, are indeed great mercies, forasmuch as they promote gain.
68. And yet they are of the smallest compared to the grace of God and to the devotion of the Cross.

69. Bishops and curates ought to mark with eyes and ears, that the commissaries of apostolical (that is, Popish) pardons are received with all reverence.
70. But they ought still more to mark with eyes and ears, that these commissaries do not preach their own fancies instead of what the Pope has commanded.
71. He who speaks against the truth of apostolical pardons, be anathema and cursed.
72. But blessed be he who is on his guard against the preacher's of pardons naughty and impudent words.

73. As the Pope justly disgraces and excommunicates those who use any kind of contrivance to do damage to the traffic in indulgences.
74. Much more it is his intention to disgrace and excommunicate those who, under the pretext of indulgences, use contrivance to do damage to holy love and truth.
75. To think that the Popish pardons have power to absolve a man even if - to utter an impossibility - he had violated the Mother of God, is madness.
76. We assert on the contrary that the Popish pardon cannot take away the least of daily sins, as regards the guilt of it.

77. To say that St. Peter, if he were now Pope, could show no greater mercies, is blasphemy against St. Peter and the Pope.
78. We assert on the contrary that both this and every other Pope has greater mercies to show: namely, the Gospel, spiritual powers, gifts of healing, etc. (1.Cor.XII).
79. He who says that the cross with the Pope's arms, solemnly set on high, has as much power as the Cross of Christ, blasphemes God.
80. Those bishops, curates, and theologists, who allow such speeches to be uttered among the people, will have one day to answer for it.

81. Such impudent sermons concerning indulgences make it difficult even for learned men to protect the Pope's honor and dignity against the calumnies, or at all events against the searching questions, of the laymen.
82. As for instance: - Why does not the Pope deliver all souls at the same time out of Purgatory for the sake of most holy love and on account of the bitterest distress of those souls - this being the most imperative of all motives, - while he saves an infinite number of souls for the sake of that most miserable thing money, to be spent on St. Peter's Minster: - this being the very slightest of motives?
83. Or again: - Why do masses for the dead continue, and why does not the Pope return or permit to be withdrawn the funds which were established for the sake of the dead, since it is now wrong to pray for those who are already saved?
84. Again: - What is this new holiness of God and the Pope that, for money's sake, they permit the wicked and the enemy of God to save a pious soul, faithful to God, and yet will not save that pious and beloved soul without payment, out of love, and on account of its great distress?

85. Again: - Why is it that the canons of penance, long abrogated and dead in themselves, because they are not used, are yet still paid for with money through the granting of pardons, as if they were still in force and alive?
86. Again: - Why does not the Pope build St. Peter's Minster with his own money - since his riches are now more ample than those of Crassus, - rather than with the money of poor Christians?
87. Again: -Why does the Pope remit or give to those who, through perfect penitence, have already a right to plenary remission and pardon?
88. Again: - What greater good could the Church receive, than if the Pope presented this remission and pardon a hundred times a day to every believer, instead of but once, as he does now?

89. If the Pope seeks by his pardon the salvation of souls, rather than money, why does he annul letters of indulgence granted long ago, and declare them out of force, though they are still in force?
90. To repress these very telling questions of the laymen by force, and not to solve them by telling the truth, is to expose the Church and the Pope to the enemy's ridicule and to make Christian people unhappy.
91. Therefore, if pardons were preached according to the Pope's intention and opinion, all these objections would be easily answered, nay, they never had occurred.
92. Away then with all those prophets who say to the community of Christ, "Peace, peace", and there is no peace.

93. But blessed be all those prophets who say to the community of Christ, "The cross, the cross," and there is no cross.
94. Christians should be exhorted to endeavor to follow Christ their Head through Cross, Death, and Hell,
95. And thus hope with confidence to enter Heaven through many miseries, rather than in false security.
M. D. XVII