Welcome! Jesus Christ is my LORD and Savior! Romans 10:9-10,13; John 3:16

At this site, I discuss politics with a Right-Wing Conservative view that is pro-environmental, is in the defense of the freedom that is our birthright, and will go into detail discussing Conservative Fundamental Protestant Christian Theology that is pro-Zionist.

At times I will post some poems or other literary things I write, and may often post various entertainment or educational videos that I find of interest, and hope you will, too.

Thank you for coming, and feel free to also visit Frontsight or one of the recommended site links. You may also submit comments through the moderation process, or simply vote in a check off box below each article.
In the Year of our LORD Jesus Christ / A.D. 2014

Statement of Principle: Barack Obama is NOT a United States Natural Born Citizen, and illegally holds office.

"No Person except a Natural Born Citizen…shall be eligible to the Office of President...."
US Constitution: Article 2, section 1, Clause 5

The Original Constitutional Intent of a Natural Born Citizen at the time and era it was written is defined in this: that a child is born to a US CITIZEN Father at the Time of Birth, on US Soil or exclusive US Sovereignty, (this includes those born upon a US Flagship on direct water passage in International Waters IF it is so done between soil of the United States to soil of the United States); and that the child has NO OTHER CITIZENSHIP(S) OR ALLEGIANCE(S) FROM BIRTH TO AGE 21.

The Founders utilized John Locke for this definition:“This holds in all the laws a man is under, whether natural or civil. Is a man under the law of nature? What made him free of that law? what gave him a free disposing of his property, according to his own will, within the compass of that law? I answer, a state of maturity wherein he might be supposed capable to know that law, that so he might keep his actions within the bounds of it. When he has acquired that state, he is presumed to know how far that law is to be his guide, and how far he may make use of his freedom, and so comes to have it; till then, some body else must guide him, who is presumed to know how far the law allows a liberty. If such a state of reason, such an age of discretion made him free, the same shall make his son free too. Is a man under the law of England? What made him free of that law? that is, to have the liberty to dispose of his actions and possessions according to his own will, within the permission of that law? A capacity of knowing that law; which is supposed by that law, at the age of one and twenty years, and in some cases sooner. If this made the father free, it shall make the son free too. Till then we see the law allows the son to have no will, but he is to be guided by the will of his father or guardian, who is to understand for him. And if the father die, and fail to substitute a deputy in his trust; if he hath not provided a tutor, to govern his son, during his minority, during his want of understanding, the law takes care to do it; some other must govern him, and be a will to him, till he hath attained to a state of freedom, and his understanding be fit to take the government of his will. But after that, the father and son are equally free as much as tutor and pupil after nonage; equally subjects of the same law together, without any dominion left in the father over the life, liberty, or estate of his son, whether they be only in the state and under the law of nature, or under the positive laws of an established government.”
John Locke, Second Treatise on Government, Chapter 6: ‘Of Paternal Power’ §. 59

"...the term ‘natural born citizen’ is used and excludes all persons owing allegiance by birth to foreign states.”
The New Englander and Yale Law Review, Volume 3 (1845), p. 414

In May of 2009, Barack Obama and the Government of the United States of America officially recognized Kogelo, Kenya, as the birth place of the putative President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama II. It was attended by U.S. Ambassador Michael Ranneberger. The official Kenyan Government memo, Compiled by: Agwanda, J.O., ASDD and Comissioned by: Machage, T. N . , SDD
states very clearly and absolutely unmistakably that: “This was to honour the birthplace of President Barack Obama and re-dedicate the tomb of Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., the president's late father.”

Under Constitutional Intent of the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Article 2.1.5, the successful US Government Attorney of later Wong Kim Ark fame shows us that the Paternal Link (that through the Father's Status) is essential in determining who is or is NOT a United States Natural Born Citizen:
Birth, therefore, does not ipso facto confer citizenship, and is essential in order that a person be a native or natural born citizen of the United States, that his father be at the time of the birth of such person a citizen thereof, or in the case he be illegitimate, that his mother be a citizen thereof at the time of such birth. – GEORGE D. COLLINS, SAN FRANCISCO, CAL.”

“…at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was ...a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.”
http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/does_barack_obama_have_kenyan_citizenship.html {link since removed}

Rep. A. Smyth (VA), House of Representatives, December 1820:
When we apply the term “citizens” to the inhabitants of States, it means those who are members of the political community. The civil law determined the condition of the son by that of the father. A man whose father was not a citizen was allowed to be a perpetual inhabitant, but not a citizen, unless citizenship was conferred on him."

Since Barack Obama depends upon "operation of law" to claim citizenship status, he is NOT a United States NATURAL born citizen, and fails to meet Constitutionality.

Ex Parte Bain, 121 U.S. 1 (1887) @ 12
"It is never to be forgotten that in the construction of the language of the Constitution here relied on, as indeed in all other instances where construction becomes necessary, we are to place ourselves as nearly as possible in the condition of the men who framed that instrument."

GIBBONS V. OGDEN, 22 U. S. 1 (1824) @ 188-189 http://supreme.justia.com/us/22/1/case.html states:
" ...the enlightened patriots who framed our Constitution, and the people who adopted it, must be understood to have employed words in their natural sense, and to have intended what they have said. If, from the imperfection of human language, there should be serious doubts respecting the extent of any given power, it is a well settled rule that the objects for which it was given, especially when those objects are expressed in the instrument itself, should have great influence in the construction."

Thomas Jefferson, in his letter to William Johnson, dated June 12, 1823 from Monticello, wrote:
"On every question of construction [of the Constitution] let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or intended against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed."

Holmes v. Jennison, 39 U.S. (14 Peters) 540 (1840)@ 570-571 http://supreme.justia.com/us/39/540/case.html
“In expounding the Constitution of the United States, every word must have its due force and appropriate meaning, for it is evident from the whole instrument that no word was unnecessarily used or needlessly added. The many discussions which have taken place upon the construction of the Constitution have proved the correctness of this proposition and shown the high talent, the caution, and the foresight of the illustrious men who framed it. Every word appears to have been weighed with the utmost deliberation, and its force and effect to have been fully understood. No word in the instrument, therefore, can be rejected as superfluous or unmeaning, and this principle of construction applies …”

The various terms of Citizen in the US Constitution are described in this pdf. http://www.scribd.com/doc/11737124/Citizenship-Terms-Used-in-the-US-Constitution-The-5-Terms-Defined-Some-Legal-Reference-to-Same

By having a Foreign National Father, and a foreign citizenship at birth and retained to his 23rd birthday, and / or a renunciation of US Citizenship declared by his mother to the US Consulate and signed under oath on August 13 of 1968 to declare her son absolved of US Citizenship for an Indonesian one, http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/05/orly-taitz-still-standing-new-lawsuits.html

Barack Hussein Obama II is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNQUALIFIED for the Office of US President.


Elk v. Wilkins, 112 US 94 (1884) @ 101-102 states that:
"The main object of the opening sentence of the fourteenth amendment was …to put it beyond doubt that all persons, white or black, and whether formerly slaves or not, born or naturalized in the United States, and OWING NO ALLEGIANCE TO ANY ALIEN POWER, should be citizens of the United States and of the state in which they reside. Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall. 36, 73; Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303, 306."

Obama owed allegiance to both the United Kingdom (Great Britain) and Kenya at birth, regardless if he was born in the US or not. Only by complete dishonesty can anyone label the man a qualified occupant of the Presidency. Ipso facto and de jure, he is not legally President of the United States, and his entire occupancy is legally voidable. His short form is so easily reproductive forgery, it might as well say Mickey Hussein Mouse as it does here: http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x13/Mactographer/birth_certificate_2-1.jpg

On January 19, 2011
and on January 25, 2011

it was almost conclusive in the journalistic sense, that the only thing on file in Hawaii as regards Obama is a data entry of : "Obama II, Barack Hussein, Male...." instead of any United States Birth Certificate or Certification of Live Birth.

"The burden of establishing a delegation of power to the United States,or the prohibition of power to the States,is upon those making the claim."
Bute v. Illinois, 333 U.S. 640 @653 (1948)

That means it is upon Obama and/or his lawyers to produce Court admissible documents establishing his birth identity with location and witnesses to the birth (cf. Nguyen v. INS 533 US 53 (2001) @ 54,62), - -

Nguyen v. INS 533 US 53 (2001) @ 54,62 http://supreme.justia.com/us/533/53/
@ 54 : “The mother's relation is verifiable from the birth itself and is documented by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses to the birth.”
@62:” In the case of the mother, the relation is verifiable from the birth itself. The mother's status is documented in most instances by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses who attest to her having given birth.”

- - as well as having a US Citizen father age 21 or above at the time of birth.

John Jay’s letter to George Washington, July 25, 1787 states:
“Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government; and to declare expressly that the commander in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen.”

It is clear that a “natural born citizen” in John Jay’s intent is someone WITHOUT dual or multiple nationalities, but has only one since birth: that of the US by both parents and geography, and NO OTHER.

In 1874, the US Supreme Court ruled that as it regards Common Law, that if we follow that model, not only did a US Citizen Father have to be present to make one a US Natural Born Citizen, but a US Citizen Mother also. And that formula of Common Law is also operative vice versa in the phrase: “all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens “, that without a US Citizen Father, you could NOT be defined as a United States Natural Born Citizen, PERIOD!!!

At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”
Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874) @167
(see also how Justia.com tried to bury this key reference case @ http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/12/justiagate_natural_born_supreme_court_citations_disappear.html )

On June 6, 1951, President Truman signed the 1951 British Treaty between the United States of America and the United Kingdom / Great Britain. This Treaty, ratified by the United States Senate, took effect on September 7, 1952. This Treaty authorizes the British Consulate to register the birth of British Subjects born in the United States of America, establishing a British jurisdiction over US Born Citizens of a British Citizen parent or parents. The British consulate of the jurisdiction of the United States where they were found, including the territory and later state of Hawaii, and were thus authorized to give British passports to those like Barack Hussein Obama II as a British subject and United Kingdom and Colonies Citizen at the petition of a British Citizen parent, like Barack Hussein Obama I's request (Obama's father).
http://travel.state.gov/law/legal/treaty/treaty_1507.html (See also 8 USC 1101 (a) (15) (F) (i) http://www.gpoaccess.gov/uscode/ )

While Obama declares he was born in Hawaii http://www.scribd.com/doc/56732637/Obama-Declares-He-Was-Born-in-Hawaii
neither Obama, nor his lawyers, nor the US Attorneys have ever produced one shred of solid identifying evidence of the man's identity into Court Evidence in a Court of Law. They refuse to enter his Birth Certificate or Certification of Live Birth, whether long or short, because both are forgeries. Even though under 333 US 640, Bute v. Illinois (1948) @ 653 and 533 US 53, Nguyen v. INS (2001) @ 54,62 they are so required to produce into Court's Evidence, submitting them as authentic under penalty of perjury to the Courts. IT NEVER HAPPENED because they are knowingly fraudulent documents.

Then there is Obama’s 1995 confession of legal identity facts as of then:
"You know, as soon as the Old Man died,
the lawyers contacted all those who might have a claim to the inheritance.
Unlike my mum,
has all the documents needed to prove
who Mark's father was."
Dreams from My Father, p. 345 Barack Obama
(confessing there is NO Birth Certificate of any kind for him in Hawaii as of 1995)

Obama can therefore be required by Law to produce an authentic US Hospital Birth Certificate into Court Evidence, something he has NEVER done, nor have in lawyers remotely done in the one reference they made to pro-Obama blogs in Hollister v. Soetoro Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-02254-JR.What is it that Robert Bauer of Perkins Coie offered the Court the one time he even referred to substantiation in Hollister v. Soetoro Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-02254-JR? Legal FRAUD upon the Court.

“Fraud on the Court is conduct:
1) on the part of an officer of the Court;
2) that is directed to the judicial machinery itself;
3) that is intentionally false, willfully blind to the truth, or is in reckless disregard for the truth;
4) that is a positive averment or a concealment when one is under duty to disclose;
5) that deceives the Court.”
Workman v. Bell, 245 F.3d 849 (6th Circuit 2001) @ 852

{{{Quote from Hollister v. Soetoro, Footnote 1: }}}1 President Obama has publicly produced a certified copy of a birth certificate showing that he was born on August 4, 1961, in Honolulu Hawaii. See, e.g., Factcheck.org, “Born in the U.S.A.: The truth about Obama’s birth certificate,” available at http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html (concluding that the birth certificate is genuine, and noting a contemporaneous birth announcement published in a Honolulu newspaper). Hawaii officials have publicly verified that they have President Obama’s “original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.” See “Certified,” Honolulu Star Bulletin, Oct. 31, 2008. This Court can take judicial notice of these public news reports. See The Washington Post v. Robinson,935 F.2d 282, 291 (D.C. Cir. 1991); Agee v. Muskie, 629 F.2d 80, 81 n.1, 90 (D.C. Cir. 1980). {{{Unquote}}}

Obama CANNOT and will NOT produce a valid Birth Certificate into evidence in a Court of Law because both released long and short copies ARE FORGERIES.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/04/white-house-releases-long-form-birth.html

Snopes.com, another pro-Obama partisan propaganda site, self-patting themselves on how factual they are when it comes to Obama, couldn’t even cite the correct alleged obstetrician it claimed delivered Obama. When the Obama forged Certification of Live Birth Long Form came out, their facts that “Rodney T. West delivered Obama in Hawaii” were cast aside as fables they promulgated to the gullible masses for over 2 years. http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=295265

The Office of the White House Press Secretary linked journalists and other interested parties to what they called an authentic Obama Short Form Certification of Live Birth, as vetted by Snopes.com. Unfortunately, the link went to Ron Polland’s made from Template Scratch openly attributed forgery, of which Polland said he was the creator. In other words, the White House sourced themselves in a genuine copy of a known public forgery which url even contained Dr. Polland’s previous internet pseudonym in the url / jpg address itself. http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/BO_Birth_Certificate.jpg

Obama also uses an identity theft Social Security Number of a now deceased person 042-68-4425 http://www.scribd.com/doc/47560424/Affidavit-Regarding-Obamas-Social-Security-Numbers-Susan-Daniels for someone born in 1890 AND ISSUED IN CONNECTICUT in 1977-1979 as if a Tax ID number for most all his adult life. It is time for Congress to empower a special prosecutor and move to Criminal Filings against him, beginning with a subpoena duces tecum of his alleged identity documents under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedures 17(c) and "call his bluff".

In matter of fact, my quoting the Kenyan Media by the same standards as Bauer’s use of “The Washington Post v. Robinson,935 F.2d 282, 291 (D.C. Cir. 1991); Agee v. Muskie, 629 F.2d 80, 81 n.1, 90 (D.C. Cir. 1980)” is de facto and de jure not only just as relevant, but MORE relevant, as it sources a nation of birth, and a national citizenship at birth as jus soli in Kenya by Government confirmation, where the Hawaii newspaper announcements neither address nationality nor location at birth, only that a birth somewhere in the world occurred for people alleged to live at so-an-so an address.

The Nairobi Kenya Eastern Standard is the source of the Birther Movement, substantiated by other African Media and Kenya’s own Government Officials in Public Statement of fact in Transcript. Of primary concern is the Nairobi Kenya Eastern Standard dated as Sunday, June 27, 2004. Its headline reads:
“Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate”

The first line reads:“Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.”

De facto, the Nairobi Kenya Eastern Standard states clearly in the headline that Senator Barack Obama is Kenyan born...hence, born in Kenya. http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm

There are no other living witnesses besides Barack's step-grandmother, who says she saw him birthed, and she says THAT was in Kenya! http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=107524 and that claim was vetted twice by Kenya's Parliament, one of which in March of 2010!!!“

Thursday, 25th March, 2010
The House met at 2.30 p.m. p. 31 ...2nd paragraph
[Mr. Orengo, Minister of Lands of the nation of Kenya, speaking]: "...how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American,become the President of America?It is because they did away with exclusion." http://www.scribd.com/doc/29758466/RDRAFT25

In others words, NON-Natural born Citizens of the US can now be President of the USA, starting with Barack Hussein Obama!!! See also: http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/04/obama-fec-audited-in-2011-little-bit.html

In matter of fact, various Secretaries of States will declare to the effect that the States have no right to verify if a candidate running for President is even a US Citizen, let alone qualified.

{{{Quote}}} “…neither the Connecticut General Statutes nor the Constitution of the State of Connecticut authorizes me to investigate a Presidential candidate’s eligibility to run for the office of President of the United States.” Secretary of State, Susan Bysicwicz (Connecticut) November 26, 2008. http://moniquemonicat.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/obama-sec-of-state-connecticuit-fax-name-removed.pdfSee also: http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2010/01/was-obama-ever-vetted-as-qualified.html

It is a legal fact that Natural Born Citizenship is required to be a US President, which Obama does NOT have... NOT having the proper US Citizenship Credentials to produce into evidence in a COURT of Law, and especially by NOT BEING a UNITED STATES NATURAL BORN CITIZEN by the same principles of primogeniture and entail in regard to a sole US Citizenship (i.e., because he has NO US Citizen Father to Naturally take the place in Society of). Hence, he is a Usurper of the US Presidency, and an active criminal regularly committing felonies every time he acts or speaks in the fraudulently obtained office of the US Presidency.

Obama's own Mother declared Obama Jr. lost his US Citizenship as of August 13, 1968

Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro-Passport Application File-Strunk v Dept of State-FOIA Release-FINAL-7-29-10

Obama's Mother formally reported on her son so as to declare Obama Jr. lost his US Citizenship as of August 13, 1968 and denounced him officially before a Department of State Representative and signed such official documentation, intending that he had officially become a permanent Indonesian Citizen, absolved of any claim to a US nationality.

Obama's mother signed under oath on the back page of Form FS-299 of 7-64, following the instructions:

"I have not (and no other person included or to be included in the passport or documentation has), since acquiring United States citizenship, been naturalized as a citizen of a foreign state, taken an oath or made an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state…

{If any of the above-mentioned acts or conditions have been performed by or apply to the applicant, or to any other person included in the passport or documentation, the portion of which applies should be struck out , and a supplementary explanatory statement under oath (or affirmation) by the person to whom the portion is applicable should be attached and made a part of this application.}

Ann Dunham wrote Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah) and struck his name out to indicate that he was legally to no longer be a United States Citizen, and the document stood to apply all relevant passages that could apply to a 7 year old who lost US Citizenship by naturalization to Indonesia with a renunciation of his allegiance and renunciation of his citizenship by both he and his mother and his step-father for him.

Again, his own mother on August 13, 1968, before a Department of State consulate, denounced her son Barack Hussein Obama as having foreign allegiances and foreign naturalization to Indonesia, and signed to this effect in form FS-277, writing and striking his name out.

We must remember that:

CHIN BAK KAN V. UNITED STATES, 186 U.S. 193 (1902) @ 200 We do not need a Presidential candidate or President so badly, that we have to go outside the pool of two citizen parents at their birth on US Soil for a President, regardless of the candidate's ethnicity. The DNC yielded to a known unqualified candidate as a means of desperation, as if the pressure of exigency to get their Party the Presidency in 2008, and discarded the sacred trust of the People of the United States in upholding the US Constitution, by offering the most powerful office in the world to a United Kingdom and Colonies foreign national turned resident of the United States who may or may not even have as much as a secondary US Citizenship under the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952's statutory law, if he indeed was born in Kenya as the media and Government of Kenya claims.

Under Original Intent and interpretation of the 14th Amendment, Obama fails to qualify as a 14th Amendment Citizen without a US Citizen Father and by having foreign dual or multi-national citizenship at birth:

The Congressional Globe, 1st session, May 30, 1866

The debate on the first section of the 14th Amendment


Senator Jacob Howard (R-Michigan) authored a "subject to the jurisdiction" clause into the 14th Amendment. Upon his introduction, the ff. are his remarks.

Part 4 (column 2), page 2890

Mr. Howard: The first amendment is to section one, declaring "that all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside...This is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.

Senator Trumbull of Illinois, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee concurred:

Part 4 (columns 1-2), page 2893

Mr. Trumbull: The provision is, "that all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens." That means "subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof"... What do we mean by "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States"? Not owing alliance to anybody else. That is what it means.

...It cannot be said of any...who owes allegiance, partial allegiance if you please, to some other Government that he is "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States."

...It is only those persons who completely within our jurisdiction, who are subject to our laws, that we think of making citizens; and there can be no objection to the proposition that such persons should be citizens."

Part 4 (columns 2-3), page 2895

Mr. Howard: I concur entirely with the honorable Senator from Illinois, in holding that the word "jurisdiction" as here employed, ought to be construed so as to imply a full and complete jurisdiction on the part of the United States...that is to say, the same jurisdiction in extent and quality as applies to every citizen of the United States now.

Then we have the dilemma of Law Legislated under an illegal Obama Presidency.

In Fletcher v. Peck, 10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 87 (1810)
the Supreme Court states @ 87
The principle asserted is that one legislature is competent to repeal any act which a former legislature was competent to pass, and that one legislature cannot abridge the powers of a succeeding legislature. The correctness of this principle so far as it respects general legislation cannot be controverted. But if an act be done under a law, a succeeding legislature cannot undo it. The past cannot be recalled by the most absolute power.”

By NOT having a legal US President in Office, not one single piece of Legislature signed by Obama is "under law" unless one can show that it was voted on by a 2/3 majority in both the House of Representatives and the US Senate and would have passed anyway, even if Obama were not in Office to exert the influence he had in the office of the US Presidency he usurped / illegally held and illegally maintained by fraud or its variants. Therefore, the objection that might be cited in Fletcher v. Peck, 10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 87 (1810) @87 that a succeeding Congress cannot void out the legislation of a preceding Congress -- when that legislation in the preceding Congress was an illegal action via a signing or benign neglect affirmation by an illegal Executive -- is therefore easily overcome.

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)@180 states that
“a law repugnant to the constitution IS VOID. . . .” and “in declaring what shall be the SUPREME law of the land, the CONSTITUTION itself is first mentioned;and not the laws of the United States generally,but those only which shall be made in PURSUANCE of the constitution,have that rank.”

I advocate that we follow the US Constitution and the advice of the US Supreme Court for such a crisis as this, and VOID OUT Obama's entire Presidency!!! Amen!!!

To all true U.S. Patriots, Obama is and remains unforgiven,

and we remain justified in both saying and doing this, because it is the appropriate response to an "alien national" who has usurped the Presidency, who is absolutely unable to produce -- and his own lawyers refuse to put forth under penalty of committing felonies to attest to its unfraudulent veracity -- evidence of a United States Natural Born Citizenship to Barack Hussein Obama II in ANY U.S. Court of Law. They won't even place his alleged Birth Certificate or Social Security Card before the Court as genuine under penalty of perjury. Under Bute v. Illinois or 333 U.S. 640 (1948) @ 653, WE THE PEOPLE have the right to demand Barack Obama PROVE the right to his claim of the U.S. Constitution authorizing him, a suspected illegal alien and known foreign national, to the powers and authority vested in that of a President of the United States...who saw fit to help re-write a foreign (Kenyan) Constitution to include Islamic Sharia compliances and to make himself once again one of its current citizens while occupying and claiming to be "First Citizen" in the Presidency of the United States.

Peace and Liberty. Semper Fidelis.

Sunday, August 31, 2014

75 Years Since The Start Of World War II And We Have A Muslim Obama Trying To Create A World War III To Kill Whites In Europe, Christians In The Middle East, And The Republic Of The United States

September 1, 1939 is now officially 75 years ago.   Will enough people remember the past in time to stop the Globalists plan to wreck the present and the future?  It sure does not look like it.  On this 75th Anniversary, it is time to remember the past in time enough to learn from it to save the present and the future, if we can.

 I am posting part of the 26 episodes (for now) still up on Youtube.

There are 26 episodes in all.  Just click on the Youtube icon on each screen and it will take you to the site that posted these timely BBC documentaries which I saw when they first came out in 1973 and were shown into 1974.  At the time, I watched each and every one of these, as my father and other family members were World War II veterans, and this was a very valuable video educational tool when applied with history books and a right willing learning capacity and motivation.  It was also praised at the time by many World War II Veterans and others who had gone through the ordeal.  

While the world has changed, where we now have a foreigner, a Muslim Marxist-Leninist occupying the Presidency of the United States, who is trying to provoke a European Conflagration over Ukraine he fully intends to walk away from and have whites kill one another, as he installs a Middle Eastern Caliphate and kills all Jews as he is killing all the Christians he can --  (over 100,000 Christian dead in Syria so far, perhaps 230,000 dead Christians in Iraq, many thousands of Christians in Egypt dead and a genocide prevented only by an Egyptian military overthrow, hundreds of thousands of Christian dead in Sudan, and on and on his war on Christians goes) --  and then  followup on his goal to eventually destroy the United States by a series of weakening major Islamic Terrorists attacks he funds - orchestrates - supports using the Intelligence and Military of the United States against itself and allying with these evil murderers while a world he has set on fire is in the midst of another World War.  That seems to be the action plan, and it could start as soon as September 11, 2014...and perhaps start with terrorist attacks on U.S. soil as an excuse to escalate into a World War designed to have the United States hit with a nuclear missile strike while he emasculates it, and sits on the codes allowing a counter-strike launch before the U.S. is hit.  That too, is a credible scenario, if he is out of the country "vacationing" again, which he can do at anytime at the drop of his golf hat.   

Make NO mistake, there are a number of us who are wary of the implications of what the synchronization of a proclamation of Obama for Americans to turn "prepper" 

and that of King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia giving warning to the West
means.   Both Abdullah and Obama have actively funded ISIS, and as part of their Muslim faith, been required on a moral charge to warn indirectly of those pre-planned and pre-orchestrated to some general plan, those terrorist attacks they are sending upon Western Europe and the United States (and possibly Canada and Mexico as well).   King Abdullah, as a requirement of his Muslim faith,  is warning fellow Muslims, so that if they are slaughtered along with the West, they were pre-warned they might die also. 

 Obama went about it a little differently.   On August 29, 2014, the scumbag de facto Muslim and de facto Traitor and de facto Subversive illegally occupying the Presidency of the United States against the legal authority and authorization granted by the Constitution of the United States, put out a proclamation that attempts to politically cover his ass for an upcoming series if ISIS / ISIL / AL Qaeda attacks he is covertly helping to bring about upon the citizens of the United States of America on our home soil.  His proclamation is "be a victim who is prepared to go back to business as usual", and "if you don't prepare, oh well, it will be too damn bad for you, because we ain't coming to help you."

Presidential Proclamation -- National Preparedness Month, 2014

- - - - - - -

In times of emergency…it is every American's responsibility to be prepared.
…Emergencies -- from hurricanes and wildfires to cyber and terrorist attacks -- can strike anywhere at any time. Americans should be familiar with local threats and hazards and take steps to reduce their devastating impacts. Families should assemble a disaster supplies kit well in advance and have a plan to reconnect after a tragedy.”
 So here we have Obama after years of Administration threats and cries of Americans are terrorists if they grow their own food, (be it vegetation or livestock), or f they stock up on emergency supplies that are meant to last more than just a few days, now out of the blue Obama is supposed to be believed when he makes this sudden 180 degree turn and expect us to believe it?  Bullshit.   In March 2012, he  signed an illegal executive order that proclaims he can seize anyone's prepper food and emergency supplies under any crisis, and tell those who are faced with starvation and without resources after being pillaged by the Federal Governments own officers, effectually to "drop dead."     

And more and more people are getting curious and doing research as to what the origins of ISIS Al Qaeda terrorism really entails, and it goes right back to the reconstituted Al Qaeda In Iraq group that Obama's State Department created and made into Al Nusrah, which split and since has rejoined under (and perhaps through) Obama.

Again, the first significant date to watch for a terrorist attack inside the United States is obviously on September 11, 2014.  

If such an attack is carried out, based on Al Qaeda's religious requirements to next "attack the head", I would be surprised if they do not make a direct assault on the Federal Government in Washington D.C., to attempt to kill members of Congress, those at the Pentagon, and raise their black Al Qaeda flag over the White House.  Fully expect Obama to be "conveniently out of town", and perhaps even "out of the country" vacationing, fund-raising, or on some sudden lame excuse to be away for an attack he funded and helped orchestrate upon the Republic if there is ever an attack by ISIS on the White House. 

 It would also surprise me if Obama does NOT scapegoat and blame the fully law abiding Christian Right or law abiding Constitutionalists, regardless of any video proof  that shows to the contrary that it is clearly Al Qaeda; and then,  and with or without Congress, Obama then starts a martial law induced Civil War upon U.S. Citizens having absolutely nothing to do with such an attack, should it ever happen in D.C. by ISIS / ISIL / Al Qaeda.

It would be my contention that Obama was ALWAYS on the side of the terrorists.  And that means from before he even doled out U.S. taxpayer monies to them in January 2009 ff. 

And a review of Larry Klayman's displayed court filing at

also bears that out.

Former Central Intelligence Agency (CIA)  Agent,  Claire Lopez,  has rightly come forward and stated the obvious,  that

 Obama switched sides in war on terror.

A former CIA agent bluntly told WND, America has switched sides in the war on terror under President Obama.

..., Lopez believed the Muslim Brotherhood has thoroughly infiltrated the Obama administration and other branches of the federal government.

She also came to the conclusion Obama had essentially the same goals in the Mideast as the late Osama bin Laden: “to remove American power and influence, including military forces, from Islamic lands.”

Meanwhile, some former CIA are finally coming out and exposing how that the US Department of State is literally trying to provoke a European War between Russia and the Ukraine (to which I gather is to then garner the various European NATO countries and their armed forces to choose up sides in its own civil war perhaps?).


Former CIA analyst and briefer to Presidents Reagan and George H.W. Bush, 
Ray McGovern 

notes how that the situation with the Ukraine is in the hands of  out of control U.S. Department of State instigators who are pushing and provoking Russia into a European War so much, that they and a Supreme Commander of NATO have ordered attacks on Russian  troops that our top military refused to carry out.     

In the interview, Alex Jones reads a Wall Street Journal article by Henry Kissinger, which is sourced at:

It is my hope that those in the United States Military, the United States Intelligence Services, and various positions of ability and influence in the United States or in positions abroad as allies, can act in a positive way on all of this, and help us overcome evil with good.

That's my input.  -- Brianroy

Thursday, August 28, 2014

Obama Is Guilty Of TREASON: A Brief Review as of Late August 2014

The United States is formally at war with Al Qaeda, and has never renounced that Congressionally sanctioned state of war formally nor informally.  

 The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), alternately known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL) is arguably a splinter group of Al Qaeda which developed under U.S. Aid and training given them by Obama.    As members of Al Qaeda, or its affiliates, the United States has never renounced a state of war with them, and to aid or train the enemy is an act of TREASON.

Under and through the Islamic Proselytizer Obama  -- who intentionally makes misrepresentation and lies when he claims to be a Christian in any sense as a follower of Jesus (whom he denies regularly as he follows Mohammed and attacks Christianity on every front as an anti-Christ) --  many ISIS / Al Qaeda members were trained by U.S. Special Forces in Jordan (circa February 2012 to early 2014) by order of Obama,  received Chemical Weapons training    http://www.wnd.com/2014/06/reports-rebels-trained-by-u-s-to-handle-chemical-weapons/      as well as expertise in small arms, mortars, anti-aircraft, artillery, man-pads, and rocket propelled grenades.   

Obama is not only promoting domestic Islamic Proselytization in the Executive Branch domestically, he also showed he is perfectly willing to trade 5 top terrorists for one Army deserter who helped kill dozens of his fellow troops in the field and then welcome him home as a hero, a dastardly deed we would expect only of a third world Islamic dictator.

The giving of 5 Top Taliban Terrorists for an Army Deserter who RENOUNCED his citizenship, who aided and abetted the enemy to give high percentage strikes and kills of fellow U.S. Military forces in the field  and attempting to welcome him home as if a hero, is open TREASON by Barack Hussein Obama.

It is a breaking of the Laws of the United States, even as retired Judge Andrew Napolitano on or about June 2, 2014, so states that
Obama can face 10 years in prison on legitimate charges of "material assistance" to terrorists


Mind you, Congress had twice rejected this Bergdahl trade before Obama said "screw Congress" and ordered the trade anyway. 

However, this top Taliban Commanders trade wasn't the only one in 2014. 

The Obama Administration is factually known to have been quietly depopulating the Terrorists of Guantanamo Bay (GITMO) from the Prison Cells back to the battlefields so that they can engage and kill more U.S. Troops in the field.  That is aiding and abetting the enemy. 

With this in mind, we now should recognize that the group from which ISIS or ISIL sprung, Al Nusrah, was once Al Qaeda In Iraq, and then reconstituted and renamed in Syria, and then receiving Obama’s funding and material support in Syria, while the main group (like the Muslim Brotherhood is parent to its offspring independent group of Hamas) was actively listed as a terrorist organization.  


Obama’s own State Department designated Al Nusrah as Al Qaeda in December of 2012
and titled the memo: “Terrorist Designations of the al-Nusrah Front as an Alias for al-Qa'ida in Iraq”

Yet, in February 2013, it was admitted that $60,000,000 in body armor and night vision knowingly ended up with al-Nusra,  http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/9898541/US-set-to-send-direct-aid-to-Syrian-rebels-says-John-Kerry.html     because, as even the Free Syria Army said:  “… [T]he Jihadist Jabhat al-Nusra group was gaining the upper hand in the revolution.”      “The Americans are now more open to the idea of arming the revolution,” said Louay al-Mokdad, a spokesman for the rebel army.

On April 13, 2013, USA Today (among others) reported that
“Washington had been providing satellite phones, SIM cards and other such equipment already, officials acknowledged, but said the level of assistance will now be increased.”

And in June of 2014, Susan Rice admitted that the funding to Terrorists to destabilize Syria, including Al Qaeda which does the bulk of the fighting and the bulk of the massacres and jihad in Syria, has now exceeded $1.7  billion.   
As of August 2014, it has well surpassed the $2,000,000,000 tally.

The U.S. Constitution defines this act as TREASON,
Article III.
Section. 3.

Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.

as does U.S. Code in upholding the Constitution of the United States, also state:

18 U.S. Code § 2381 - Treason
"Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned
not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."

Obama had been funding and training ISIS or ISIL, and practicing a Middle Eastern program of religious genocide on Christians in the Middle East because he cannot successfully wage an open war of outright genocide on Christians in the United States.  This very act of funding Islamists to kill Christians and wage terror as zealots of Islam, proves by the fruit and deeds of his acts and actions, that Obama is not only a radicalized Islamic Terrorist himself, but he is an anti-humanitarian and anti-Constitutionalist regarding the Republic of these United States of America. 

      As I posted earlier, I personally believe that because of the material aid and comfort of ISIS and ISIL members that Obama has given them in the tens of millions of dollars, the family of James Foley have Article III standing to both sue and win over a $1,000,000,000 settlement from the U.S. Government, and to bring about multiple felony convictions upon Obama himself, which necessarily requires his removal from office.

In the U.S. Supreme Court Case of
Baker v. Carr, 369 U.S. 186 @ 204 (1962).
"Have the appellants alleged such a personal stake in the outcome of the controversy as to assure that concrete adverseness which sharpens the presentation of issues upon which the court so largely depends for illumination of difficult constitutional questions? This is the gist of the question of standing. It is, of course, a question of federal law."

And also in Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555 (1992) @ 560 (Discussing Article III standing to sue, states that Article III standing to sue is)
“an invasion of a legally protected interest which is (a) concrete and particularized and (b) actual or imminent, not conjectural or hypothetical.”

In effect, Obama was materially aiding, comforting, financing, supporting those the United States is officially at war with, such as Al Qaeda and the Al Qaeda affiliate of ISIS or ISIL; and it is his enabling those terrorists which is directly responsible for drawing reporter James Foley to Obama and (the now head of Central Intelligence Agency or C.I.A.) John Brennan’s man-pad smuggling operations through Turkey  into Syria and the Turkish-Syrian border (where James Foley went and was captured).  When someone is killed or seriously injured as a direct consequence of someone going outside Constitutional authority as pertaining to the office of the Presidency of the United States, committing TREASON against the United States while doing so, he should be tried, convicted, and given the maximum penalty that can be handed out by jurisprudence.  

 Also recently posted here in a guest blog post,Stratfor Reports that the U.S. Military and C.I.A. are actively joint tasked with Iran's Al Quds forces inside of Iraq!   The original article by Stratfor may be found at: 

and its title and particular text of concern, states:
  "In Iraq, the United States and Iran Align Against the Islamic State"

"...the Quds Force -- the overseas arm of Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps -- and the Ministry of Intelligence and Security...work ...with the U.S. military's Central Command and the CIA.
...Stratfor has learned that Washington and Tehran agreed on the limited force the Quds Force has deployed in Iraq's Diyala province
to fight alongside Kurdish peshmerga forces against the Islamic State."

There you have it folks.  The nation of Iran, using an elite force which the United States has designated as terrorists with its alternate name for "Jerusalem" or Quds force, http://www.reuters.com/article/2009/07/23/idUSLM225970 

"Qods (Jerusalem) Force is a shadowy IRGC special operations unit, handling activities abroad.
The United States, which says the Qods Force backs militants in Iraq, Lebanon and Afghanistan, has imposed sanctions on firms and individuals linked to what it brands a terrorist organisation.              (Reuters)"

a nation which has pledged it will war with 50,000 jihadi warriors inside the United States one day, and whose Shia Islamic ideology is to bathe the world in fire and blood, with the still mainstream Shia Islam apocalyptic religious agenda of killing of most of the world and forcing its survivors to convert to Islam or die, while forever annihilating Israel and the United States as its two great adversaries, now works hand in glove with Obama, the man who Islamic Terrorists mostly see as their own.  It might even be said, in Obama's eyes, Obama never sees a Muslim terrorist organization he doesn't like. 

Lest we forget his Cairo Speech in 2009 written by the Imam who wanted to build the World Trade Center mosque as a victory mosque of Islam upon America on 9/11/2001.

 In June 2009, Obama visited Cairo
to give a speech in which he  referenced and called himself Baraq of the story of Isra, the winged jack-ass of the coming Mahdi, who lift and enable to the heavens the coming Mahdi or 12th Imam of Shia prophecy, who will bathe the world in blood for Islam and kill all who will not submit, and burn the world with fire. 

Stated Muslim Historian Bat Ye’or in National Review at the time:

     “Obama’s Cairo discourse fits perfectly into his agenda. It flatters Muslim sensibilities and expresses the Muslim view of historical tolerance and cultural superiority over infidel civilizations. When Obama mentioned the “Isra” event, he referred to Muhammad’s ascension to heaven and his return in one night on a winged mule named Buraq. …the Isra event is not recognised by non-Muslims, and it didn’t happen in Jerusalem, as this name does not appear once in the Koran.”

That Cairo Speech was written based on Chapter 6 of a book written by a Muslim fanatic, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, chief agitator who is the same New York City front-man Imam who pushed for the Ground Zero Mosque as an in-your-face victory of Islam over the West at Ground Zero.

Again, at Cairo, Barack Hussein Obama II stated:
"When Jerusalem is a secure and lasting home for Jews and Christians and Muslims, and a place for all of the children of Abraham to mingle peacefully together as in the story of Isra"...

In the story of Isra, Barack / Baraq is the name of a mythological winged donkey who acts as the servant of Mohammed and carries him away into the heavens. Clearly, Barack (Obama) names himself -- in Shia Muslim 'messianic terminology -- as "the servant Baraq" of the coming 12th Imam who cause the heavenly exaltation/ascent of that chosen "prophet" of Islam who will war against the US and Israel, and destroy them both with "fire".

In other words, Barack Obama told Islam words to this effect:  
"I, in no uncertain terms, want to be your coming bloody Mahdi's / Islamic war messiah's     jack-ass,   and give him the means to literally destroy the US and Israel" 
or words to this effect.

Robert Spencer of Jihadwatch gives us an essential insight at:

Where he states:

"Obama quoted 9:119, which Pickthall renders this way: "O ye who believe! Be careful of your duty to Allah, and be with the truthful."

The passage continues:

It is not for the townsfolk of Al-Madinah and for those around them of the wandering Arabs to stay behind the messenger of Allah and prefer their lives to his life. That is because neither thirst nor toil nor hunger afflicteth them in the way of Allah, nor step they any step that angereth the disbelievers, nor gain they from the enemy a gain, but a good deed is recorded for them therefor. Lo! Allah loseth not the wages of the good. Nor spend they any spending, small or great, nor do they cross a valley, but it is recorded for them, that Allah may repay them the best of what they used to do. And the believers should not all go out to fight. Of every troop of them, a party only should go forth, that they (who are left behind) may gain sound knowledge in religion, and that they may warn their folk when they return to them, so that they may beware. O ye who believe! Fight those of the disbelievers who are near to you, and let them find harshness in you, and know that Allah is with those who keep their duty (unto Him). -- 9:120-123

In that passage, the Qur'an is scolding Muslims who refused to accompany Muhammad on his expedition to Tabouk in northern Arabia, where he wanted to fight a Byzantine garrison. The Byzantines weren't there when he arrived, and so there was no battle, but he was considerably angered that some Muslims in Medina and among the Bedouins ("wandering Arabs") had refused to make the trip -- they "prefer their lives to his life." The Qur'an promises that if they do anything that "angereth the disbelievers," they will be credited with having done a good deed, and Allah will repay them for such good deeds. The Muslims should fight the unbelievers and be harsh with them.

Obama picked out of this one sentence that made it appear as if the Qur'an was simply counseling one to speak the truth, mindful of the divine presence. In reality, the passage is about the necessity to wage jihad warfare against unbelievers, and not to fail to perform this duty. He took a passage about warfare and division and passed it off as part of a call for us all to come together and sing kumbaya.

Years before he used the Intelligence Community and Leftist Organizations of the United States to overthrow the ally of President Mubarak in Egypt, Obama invited Mubarak’s pre-chosen successors to attend his Speech in Cairo.



In Cairo, on road trips, and on television, Obama proselytized the Muslim agenda.

Robert Spencer of Jihadwatch, writes:
'ISNA’s { Islamic Society of North America } “intimate relationship with the Muslim Brotherhood” ought to raise the concerns of every free American, not just the Justice Department. After all, the Muslim Brotherhood in the United States is dedicated -- in its own words -- to “a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and ‘sabotaging’ its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions.”

And now, all these years later, the TRAITOR Obama is letting his true Shia based Mahdi Messianic ideology guide him while in the highest office in the United States, and committing asymmetrical war, espionage, and out and out betrayal upon it. 

Obama is directly ordering the arming, the giving of aid - comfort - support to the very Al Qaeda groups that we oppose right now in war on other parts of the planet, and is helping them in the capacity to overthrow other nations to aid and abet their growing into multi-nation Caliphate, envisioning himself as Mohammed's heavenly jack-ass, who will carry the coming Mahdi to the heights of power, so that he, who ever (and whatever terrorist Islamic Organization) he may be perceived to be, whether literally or allegorically, he (or they) can bathe the world in blood for Islam.  Don't believe it?  Hundreds of thousands of dead lay in the Sudan, Iraq, and Syria, not to mention the many thousands of Christian dead in Egypt and other parts of the Middle East thanks to Obama's pro-Islamic Terrorist supporting Foreign Policies as the new policies he demands of the United States here and abroad.

Barack Hussein Obama II, a known current foreign citizen illegally occupying the Presidency and empowered by corrupt Federal Officials and various powerful nefarious Globalists and Globalist front groups,  is waging a passive pro-active bio-terrorism campaign, through the efforts of Jeh Johnson, against the people of the United States, to bring hundreds of diseases and some plagues that will wage health havoc upon humans and animals alike. 


By conducting a bio-terror invasion on the United States, Obama is de jure and de facto aiding Islamic Terrorists who state that their goal is to destroy the United States. 

Some may argue that Obama merely wants to economically overwhelm and collapse the Welfare finances of the United States and then collapse its Republic.  The motivation for this is so that a replacement Socialist or Communist-Socialist Government removing rights of the masses and giving far more abusive and murderous powers of playing gods to those already in control, might be instituted with success.

Some might look at the massive importation of diseases, before they ship out diseased,


including cases of contagious tuberculosis,

bubonic plague, hoof and mouth disease, and various fatal diseases to man and the U.S. livestock industry alike,  and say it is only Obama's intent to make us accept the need for [Un]Affordable Healthcare Act labeled as Obamacare, which is supposed to strive to be "almost as good as the VA care we give our veterans", or words to this effect.

Perhaps they meant the Phoenix, Arizona VA Hospital as one of their examples, where the standard operating procedure is to hide the problems and start Catch-22 Death lists / stealth waiting lists, rather than give out health care (so the administrators get their bonuses NO MATTER WHAT)!



If the U.S. Government with all its billions of dollars and thousands of personnel cannot oversee a smooth operation of Veterans Hospitals, and the Obamacare model is only striving to have an "almost as good as efficiency" of the VA run hospitals, then for the Mainstream Media to report sympathetically the VA total screw of Veterans by it mishandled Healthcare, to then still demand the rest of us accept Obamacare which strives to be "almost as good as" after their reporting on the Government run combination death-care and refusal to care overpaid corrupt VA model, means they in the Media who still push Obamacare are selectively sociopathically insane.

 The attitude of the Veterans Affairs Administrators across this nation in more than 69 VA hospitals toward their patients was, for the sake of receiving bonuses of as little as $9,000 while collecting salaries ranging from $165,000 to as much as $330,000 a year, simply murderous.  Literally.   One Administrator (it was reported on May 21, 2014) made the comment that rather than treat the Veterans with Healthcare, he personally would rather take the vets out back of the hospital, and shoot them in the head,  http://www.infowars.com/exclusive-whistleblower-reveals-new-va-scandal/       It is far more serious and far worse than the Veteran Administrations own internal propaganda material teaching its staff to blow off all medical denial - non treatment or even mistreatment of veterans as if they are just cranky old muppets like "Oscar the Grouch".  http://www.infowars.com/va-training-guide-compares-veterans-to-oscar-the-grouch/

It may get to the point where there will be those illegals helped in to the United States, and then shipped around the nation to all 50 states as known contagious and infected carriers sent by the illegal Obama Administration as a bio-terror invasion upon the United States, might not yet be contaminated enough to cause the mass bio-attacks Obama and Jeh Johnson are hoping for.  We may soon get to the point that we have credible and video reports where  doctors or those giving injections (who the CDC eventually deploys in order to inoculate, or the excuse thereto)  may potentially or simply just WILL inject live cultures of bio-hazards into the subjects, such as the newly revived 1918 Spanish Flu virus, or Ebola, or even a plague of some sort, before releasing them back into the population on a bus ticket to anywhere U.S.A., at which time the Obama Administration switches from a passive pro-active bio-terrorism upon the citizens of the United States, and makes it an Aggressive Pro-Active Bio-Terror Campaign in order to bring about a Health Crisis requiring Martial Law and forced inoculations where people can be selectively killed off by the forcibly given shots themselves.

Obama and his co-conspirators have not only committed acts of bio-terrorism, chargeable as TREASON against the United States under Article 3 Section 3 of the Constitution, they have also violated Article 4 Section 4 of the Constitution which guarantees the States are to be free from invasion, and says:
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion

    We must ever be on the alert for those actions, especially self-initiated and self-created national crises created by  the Obama Administration to attempt to enlarge its already illegally held and illegally exercised putative Constitutional powers, and REFUSE any amnesty demanded for these contagious passive bio-terror contagious carrier illegals imported by Obama, Jeh Johnson, and whoever. 

A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U.S. 495 (1935) @ 495, 528-29
@ 495  “Extraordinary conditions, such as an economic crisis, may call for extraordinary remedies, but they cannot create or enlarge constitutional power.”

@528    “Extraordinary conditions may call for extraordinary remedies. But the argument necessarily stops short of an attempt to justify action which lies outside the sphere of constitutional authority. Extraordinary conditions do not create or enlarge constitutional power."

Again, these illegals brought in by Obama, as he and Johnson intentionally pulled back the U.S. Border Patrol from manning the U.S. -Mexico border throughout Texas, constitute an invasion of the States of the United States, and the Supreme Court guides us with the warning that we should not buckle and give them Amnesty, no matter what Obama manufactured crisis is sent upon the citizens of the United States, saying
“[T]he inestimable heritage of citizenship is not to be conceded to those who seek to avail themselves of it under pressure of a particular exigency..."
Chin Bak Khan  v.  UNITED STATES, 186 U.S. 193 (1902) @ 200

These illegals being imported are not just kids, but mostly adults and many even with graying hair
and long criminal records in various central American countries, and are as old adults being treated as if kids to mask the ages of them on Federal forms purposely misfiled out by the Obama Administration as to their ages,  enrolling with U.S. Citizen children in public schools, where they can rape and murder and do who knows what and are expected to have benefits of a doubt no U.S. Citizen would even remotely ever expect to be granted, because the order came  from Barack Hussein Obama, and most people are idiotically in psychological subservience to Political Negrophobia.

It is time people got over the race issue, and looked at the LAW and applied it EQUALLY!  Obama commits TREASON and needs to be Prosecuted, Convicted, and get the Maximum for it under 18 U.S. Code § 2381 be it by IMPEACHMENT Trials or whatever the proper legal recourse in this Republic is. 


[[[[  Update August 30, 2014       Attorney Larry Klayman has filed a lawsuit on behalf of those who are terror victims of some of the Islamic terror groups financed by Obama.  Klayman is applying the RICO (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations) Act as applicable in a lawsuit against Obama.   

Go get'em Larry!!!



End of  update August 30, 2014 ]]]]