Welcome! Jesus Christ is my LORD and Savior! Romans 10:9-10,13; John 3:16

At this site, I discuss politics with a Right-Wing Conservative view that is pro-environmental, is in the defense of the freedom that is our birthright, and will go into detail discussing Conservative Fundamental Protestant Christian Theology that is pro-Zionist.

At times I will post some poems or other literary things I write, and may often post various entertainment or educational videos that I find of interest, and hope you will, too.

Thank you for coming, and feel free to also visit Frontsight or one of the recommended site links. You may also submit comments through the moderation process, or simply vote in a check off box below each article.
In the Year of our LORD Jesus Christ / A.D. 2014

Statement of Principle: Barack Obama is NOT a United States Natural Born Citizen, and illegally holds office.

"No Person except a Natural Born Citizen…shall be eligible to the Office of President...."
US Constitution: Article 2, section 1, Clause 5

The Original Constitutional Intent of a Natural Born Citizen at the time and era it was written is defined in this: that a child is born to a US CITIZEN Father at the Time of Birth, on US Soil or exclusive US Sovereignty, (this includes those born upon a US Flagship on direct water passage in International Waters IF it is so done between soil of the United States to soil of the United States); and that the child has NO OTHER CITIZENSHIP(S) OR ALLEGIANCE(S) FROM BIRTH TO AGE 21.

The Founders utilized John Locke for this definition:“This holds in all the laws a man is under, whether natural or civil. Is a man under the law of nature? What made him free of that law? what gave him a free disposing of his property, according to his own will, within the compass of that law? I answer, a state of maturity wherein he might be supposed capable to know that law, that so he might keep his actions within the bounds of it. When he has acquired that state, he is presumed to know how far that law is to be his guide, and how far he may make use of his freedom, and so comes to have it; till then, some body else must guide him, who is presumed to know how far the law allows a liberty. If such a state of reason, such an age of discretion made him free, the same shall make his son free too. Is a man under the law of England? What made him free of that law? that is, to have the liberty to dispose of his actions and possessions according to his own will, within the permission of that law? A capacity of knowing that law; which is supposed by that law, at the age of one and twenty years, and in some cases sooner. If this made the father free, it shall make the son free too. Till then we see the law allows the son to have no will, but he is to be guided by the will of his father or guardian, who is to understand for him. And if the father die, and fail to substitute a deputy in his trust; if he hath not provided a tutor, to govern his son, during his minority, during his want of understanding, the law takes care to do it; some other must govern him, and be a will to him, till he hath attained to a state of freedom, and his understanding be fit to take the government of his will. But after that, the father and son are equally free as much as tutor and pupil after nonage; equally subjects of the same law together, without any dominion left in the father over the life, liberty, or estate of his son, whether they be only in the state and under the law of nature, or under the positive laws of an established government.”
John Locke, Second Treatise on Government, Chapter 6: ‘Of Paternal Power’ §. 59

"...the term ‘natural born citizen’ is used and excludes all persons owing allegiance by birth to foreign states.”
The New Englander and Yale Law Review, Volume 3 (1845), p. 414

In May of 2009, Barack Obama and the Government of the United States of America officially recognized Kogelo, Kenya, as the birth place of the putative President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama II. It was attended by U.S. Ambassador Michael Ranneberger. The official Kenyan Government memo, Compiled by: Agwanda, J.O., ASDD and Comissioned by: Machage, T. N . , SDD
states very clearly and absolutely unmistakably that: “This was to honour the birthplace of President Barack Obama and re-dedicate the tomb of Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., the president's late father.”

Under Constitutional Intent of the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Article 2.1.5, the successful US Government Attorney of later Wong Kim Ark fame shows us that the Paternal Link (that through the Father's Status) is essential in determining who is or is NOT a United States Natural Born Citizen:
Birth, therefore, does not ipso facto confer citizenship, and is essential in order that a person be a native or natural born citizen of the United States, that his father be at the time of the birth of such person a citizen thereof, or in the case he be illegitimate, that his mother be a citizen thereof at the time of such birth. – GEORGE D. COLLINS, SAN FRANCISCO, CAL.”

“…at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was ...a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.”
http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/does_barack_obama_have_kenyan_citizenship.html {link since removed}

Rep. A. Smyth (VA), House of Representatives, December 1820:
When we apply the term “citizens” to the inhabitants of States, it means those who are members of the political community. The civil law determined the condition of the son by that of the father. A man whose father was not a citizen was allowed to be a perpetual inhabitant, but not a citizen, unless citizenship was conferred on him."

Since Barack Obama depends upon "operation of law" to claim citizenship status, he is NOT a United States NATURAL born citizen, and fails to meet Constitutionality.

Ex Parte Bain, 121 U.S. 1 (1887) @ 12
"It is never to be forgotten that in the construction of the language of the Constitution here relied on, as indeed in all other instances where construction becomes necessary, we are to place ourselves as nearly as possible in the condition of the men who framed that instrument."

GIBBONS V. OGDEN, 22 U. S. 1 (1824) @ 188-189 http://supreme.justia.com/us/22/1/case.html states:
" ...the enlightened patriots who framed our Constitution, and the people who adopted it, must be understood to have employed words in their natural sense, and to have intended what they have said. If, from the imperfection of human language, there should be serious doubts respecting the extent of any given power, it is a well settled rule that the objects for which it was given, especially when those objects are expressed in the instrument itself, should have great influence in the construction."

Thomas Jefferson, in his letter to William Johnson, dated June 12, 1823 from Monticello, wrote:
"On every question of construction [of the Constitution] let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or intended against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed."

Holmes v. Jennison, 39 U.S. (14 Peters) 540 (1840)@ 570-571 http://supreme.justia.com/us/39/540/case.html
“In expounding the Constitution of the United States, every word must have its due force and appropriate meaning, for it is evident from the whole instrument that no word was unnecessarily used or needlessly added. The many discussions which have taken place upon the construction of the Constitution have proved the correctness of this proposition and shown the high talent, the caution, and the foresight of the illustrious men who framed it. Every word appears to have been weighed with the utmost deliberation, and its force and effect to have been fully understood. No word in the instrument, therefore, can be rejected as superfluous or unmeaning, and this principle of construction applies …”

The various terms of Citizen in the US Constitution are described in this pdf. http://www.scribd.com/doc/11737124/Citizenship-Terms-Used-in-the-US-Constitution-The-5-Terms-Defined-Some-Legal-Reference-to-Same

By having a Foreign National Father, and a foreign citizenship at birth and retained to his 23rd birthday, and / or a renunciation of US Citizenship declared by his mother to the US Consulate and signed under oath on August 13 of 1968 to declare her son absolved of US Citizenship for an Indonesian one, http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/05/orly-taitz-still-standing-new-lawsuits.html

Barack Hussein Obama II is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNQUALIFIED for the Office of US President.


Elk v. Wilkins, 112 US 94 (1884) @ 101-102 states that:
"The main object of the opening sentence of the fourteenth amendment was …to put it beyond doubt that all persons, white or black, and whether formerly slaves or not, born or naturalized in the United States, and OWING NO ALLEGIANCE TO ANY ALIEN POWER, should be citizens of the United States and of the state in which they reside. Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall. 36, 73; Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303, 306."

Obama owed allegiance to both the United Kingdom (Great Britain) and Kenya at birth, regardless if he was born in the US or not. Only by complete dishonesty can anyone label the man a qualified occupant of the Presidency. Ipso facto and de jure, he is not legally President of the United States, and his entire occupancy is legally voidable. His short form is so easily reproductive forgery, it might as well say Mickey Hussein Mouse as it does here: http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x13/Mactographer/birth_certificate_2-1.jpg

On January 19, 2011
and on January 25, 2011

it was almost conclusive in the journalistic sense, that the only thing on file in Hawaii as regards Obama is a data entry of : "Obama II, Barack Hussein, Male...." instead of any United States Birth Certificate or Certification of Live Birth.

"The burden of establishing a delegation of power to the United States,or the prohibition of power to the States,is upon those making the claim."
Bute v. Illinois, 333 U.S. 640 @653 (1948)

That means it is upon Obama and/or his lawyers to produce Court admissible documents establishing his birth identity with location and witnesses to the birth (cf. Nguyen v. INS 533 US 53 (2001) @ 54,62), - -

Nguyen v. INS 533 US 53 (2001) @ 54,62 http://supreme.justia.com/us/533/53/
@ 54 : “The mother's relation is verifiable from the birth itself and is documented by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses to the birth.”
@62:” In the case of the mother, the relation is verifiable from the birth itself. The mother's status is documented in most instances by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses who attest to her having given birth.”

- - as well as having a US Citizen father age 21 or above at the time of birth.

John Jay’s letter to George Washington, July 25, 1787 states:
“Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government; and to declare expressly that the commander in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen.”

It is clear that a “natural born citizen” in John Jay’s intent is someone WITHOUT dual or multiple nationalities, but has only one since birth: that of the US by both parents and geography, and NO OTHER.

In 1874, the US Supreme Court ruled that as it regards Common Law, that if we follow that model, not only did a US Citizen Father have to be present to make one a US Natural Born Citizen, but a US Citizen Mother also. And that formula of Common Law is also operative vice versa in the phrase: “all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens “, that without a US Citizen Father, you could NOT be defined as a United States Natural Born Citizen, PERIOD!!!

At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”
Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874) @167
(see also how Justia.com tried to bury this key reference case @ http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/12/justiagate_natural_born_supreme_court_citations_disappear.html )

On June 6, 1951, President Truman signed the 1951 British Treaty between the United States of America and the United Kingdom / Great Britain. This Treaty, ratified by the United States Senate, took effect on September 7, 1952. This Treaty authorizes the British Consulate to register the birth of British Subjects born in the United States of America, establishing a British jurisdiction over US Born Citizens of a British Citizen parent or parents. The British consulate of the jurisdiction of the United States where they were found, including the territory and later state of Hawaii, and were thus authorized to give British passports to those like Barack Hussein Obama II as a British subject and United Kingdom and Colonies Citizen at the petition of a British Citizen parent, like Barack Hussein Obama I's request (Obama's father).
http://travel.state.gov/law/legal/treaty/treaty_1507.html (See also 8 USC 1101 (a) (15) (F) (i) http://www.gpoaccess.gov/uscode/ )

While Obama declares he was born in Hawaii http://www.scribd.com/doc/56732637/Obama-Declares-He-Was-Born-in-Hawaii
neither Obama, nor his lawyers, nor the US Attorneys have ever produced one shred of solid identifying evidence of the man's identity into Court Evidence in a Court of Law. They refuse to enter his Birth Certificate or Certification of Live Birth, whether long or short, because both are forgeries. Even though under 333 US 640, Bute v. Illinois (1948) @ 653 and 533 US 53, Nguyen v. INS (2001) @ 54,62 they are so required to produce into Court's Evidence, submitting them as authentic under penalty of perjury to the Courts. IT NEVER HAPPENED because they are knowingly fraudulent documents.

Then there is Obama’s 1995 confession of legal identity facts as of then:
"You know, as soon as the Old Man died,
the lawyers contacted all those who might have a claim to the inheritance.
Unlike my mum,
has all the documents needed to prove
who Mark's father was."
Dreams from My Father, p. 345 Barack Obama
(confessing there is NO Birth Certificate of any kind for him in Hawaii as of 1995)

Obama can therefore be required by Law to produce an authentic US Hospital Birth Certificate into Court Evidence, something he has NEVER done, nor have in lawyers remotely done in the one reference they made to pro-Obama blogs in Hollister v. Soetoro Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-02254-JR.What is it that Robert Bauer of Perkins Coie offered the Court the one time he even referred to substantiation in Hollister v. Soetoro Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-02254-JR? Legal FRAUD upon the Court.

“Fraud on the Court is conduct:
1) on the part of an officer of the Court;
2) that is directed to the judicial machinery itself;
3) that is intentionally false, willfully blind to the truth, or is in reckless disregard for the truth;
4) that is a positive averment or a concealment when one is under duty to disclose;
5) that deceives the Court.”
Workman v. Bell, 245 F.3d 849 (6th Circuit 2001) @ 852

{{{Quote from Hollister v. Soetoro, Footnote 1: }}}1 President Obama has publicly produced a certified copy of a birth certificate showing that he was born on August 4, 1961, in Honolulu Hawaii. See, e.g., Factcheck.org, “Born in the U.S.A.: The truth about Obama’s birth certificate,” available at http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html (concluding that the birth certificate is genuine, and noting a contemporaneous birth announcement published in a Honolulu newspaper). Hawaii officials have publicly verified that they have President Obama’s “original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.” See “Certified,” Honolulu Star Bulletin, Oct. 31, 2008. This Court can take judicial notice of these public news reports. See The Washington Post v. Robinson,935 F.2d 282, 291 (D.C. Cir. 1991); Agee v. Muskie, 629 F.2d 80, 81 n.1, 90 (D.C. Cir. 1980). {{{Unquote}}}

Obama CANNOT and will NOT produce a valid Birth Certificate into evidence in a Court of Law because both released long and short copies ARE FORGERIES.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/04/white-house-releases-long-form-birth.html

Snopes.com, another pro-Obama partisan propaganda site, self-patting themselves on how factual they are when it comes to Obama, couldn’t even cite the correct alleged obstetrician it claimed delivered Obama. When the Obama forged Certification of Live Birth Long Form came out, their facts that “Rodney T. West delivered Obama in Hawaii” were cast aside as fables they promulgated to the gullible masses for over 2 years. http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=295265

The Office of the White House Press Secretary linked journalists and other interested parties to what they called an authentic Obama Short Form Certification of Live Birth, as vetted by Snopes.com. Unfortunately, the link went to Ron Polland’s made from Template Scratch openly attributed forgery, of which Polland said he was the creator. In other words, the White House sourced themselves in a genuine copy of a known public forgery which url even contained Dr. Polland’s previous internet pseudonym in the url / jpg address itself. http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/BO_Birth_Certificate.jpg

Obama also uses an identity theft Social Security Number of a now deceased person 042-68-4425 http://www.scribd.com/doc/47560424/Affidavit-Regarding-Obamas-Social-Security-Numbers-Susan-Daniels for someone born in 1890 AND ISSUED IN CONNECTICUT in 1977-1979 as if a Tax ID number for most all his adult life. It is time for Congress to empower a special prosecutor and move to Criminal Filings against him, beginning with a subpoena duces tecum of his alleged identity documents under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedures 17(c) and "call his bluff".

In matter of fact, my quoting the Kenyan Media by the same standards as Bauer’s use of “The Washington Post v. Robinson,935 F.2d 282, 291 (D.C. Cir. 1991); Agee v. Muskie, 629 F.2d 80, 81 n.1, 90 (D.C. Cir. 1980)” is de facto and de jure not only just as relevant, but MORE relevant, as it sources a nation of birth, and a national citizenship at birth as jus soli in Kenya by Government confirmation, where the Hawaii newspaper announcements neither address nationality nor location at birth, only that a birth somewhere in the world occurred for people alleged to live at so-an-so an address.

The Nairobi Kenya Eastern Standard is the source of the Birther Movement, substantiated by other African Media and Kenya’s own Government Officials in Public Statement of fact in Transcript. Of primary concern is the Nairobi Kenya Eastern Standard dated as Sunday, June 27, 2004. Its headline reads:
“Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate”

The first line reads:“Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.”

De facto, the Nairobi Kenya Eastern Standard states clearly in the headline that Senator Barack Obama is Kenyan born...hence, born in Kenya. http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm

There are no other living witnesses besides Barack's step-grandmother, who says she saw him birthed, and she says THAT was in Kenya! http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=107524 and that claim was vetted twice by Kenya's Parliament, one of which in March of 2010!!!“

Thursday, 25th March, 2010
The House met at 2.30 p.m. p. 31 ...2nd paragraph
[Mr. Orengo, Minister of Lands of the nation of Kenya, speaking]: "...how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American,become the President of America?It is because they did away with exclusion." http://www.scribd.com/doc/29758466/RDRAFT25

In others words, NON-Natural born Citizens of the US can now be President of the USA, starting with Barack Hussein Obama!!! See also: http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/04/obama-fec-audited-in-2011-little-bit.html

In matter of fact, various Secretaries of States will declare to the effect that the States have no right to verify if a candidate running for President is even a US Citizen, let alone qualified.

{{{Quote}}} “…neither the Connecticut General Statutes nor the Constitution of the State of Connecticut authorizes me to investigate a Presidential candidate’s eligibility to run for the office of President of the United States.” Secretary of State, Susan Bysicwicz (Connecticut) November 26, 2008. http://moniquemonicat.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/obama-sec-of-state-connecticuit-fax-name-removed.pdfSee also: http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2010/01/was-obama-ever-vetted-as-qualified.html

It is a legal fact that Natural Born Citizenship is required to be a US President, which Obama does NOT have... NOT having the proper US Citizenship Credentials to produce into evidence in a COURT of Law, and especially by NOT BEING a UNITED STATES NATURAL BORN CITIZEN by the same principles of primogeniture and entail in regard to a sole US Citizenship (i.e., because he has NO US Citizen Father to Naturally take the place in Society of). Hence, he is a Usurper of the US Presidency, and an active criminal regularly committing felonies every time he acts or speaks in the fraudulently obtained office of the US Presidency.

Obama's own Mother declared Obama Jr. lost his US Citizenship as of August 13, 1968

Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro-Passport Application File-Strunk v Dept of State-FOIA Release-FINAL-7-29-10

Obama's Mother formally reported on her son so as to declare Obama Jr. lost his US Citizenship as of August 13, 1968 and denounced him officially before a Department of State Representative and signed such official documentation, intending that he had officially become a permanent Indonesian Citizen, absolved of any claim to a US nationality.

Obama's mother signed under oath on the back page of Form FS-299 of 7-64, following the instructions:

"I have not (and no other person included or to be included in the passport or documentation has), since acquiring United States citizenship, been naturalized as a citizen of a foreign state, taken an oath or made an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state…

{If any of the above-mentioned acts or conditions have been performed by or apply to the applicant, or to any other person included in the passport or documentation, the portion of which applies should be struck out , and a supplementary explanatory statement under oath (or affirmation) by the person to whom the portion is applicable should be attached and made a part of this application.}

Ann Dunham wrote Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah) and struck his name out to indicate that he was legally to no longer be a United States Citizen, and the document stood to apply all relevant passages that could apply to a 7 year old who lost US Citizenship by naturalization to Indonesia with a renunciation of his allegiance and renunciation of his citizenship by both he and his mother and his step-father for him.

Again, his own mother on August 13, 1968, before a Department of State consulate, denounced her son Barack Hussein Obama as having foreign allegiances and foreign naturalization to Indonesia, and signed to this effect in form FS-277, writing and striking his name out.

We must remember that:

CHIN BAK KAN V. UNITED STATES, 186 U.S. 193 (1902) @ 200 We do not need a Presidential candidate or President so badly, that we have to go outside the pool of two citizen parents at their birth on US Soil for a President, regardless of the candidate's ethnicity. The DNC yielded to a known unqualified candidate as a means of desperation, as if the pressure of exigency to get their Party the Presidency in 2008, and discarded the sacred trust of the People of the United States in upholding the US Constitution, by offering the most powerful office in the world to a United Kingdom and Colonies foreign national turned resident of the United States who may or may not even have as much as a secondary US Citizenship under the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952's statutory law, if he indeed was born in Kenya as the media and Government of Kenya claims.

Under Original Intent and interpretation of the 14th Amendment, Obama fails to qualify as a 14th Amendment Citizen without a US Citizen Father and by having foreign dual or multi-national citizenship at birth:

The Congressional Globe, 1st session, May 30, 1866

The debate on the first section of the 14th Amendment


Senator Jacob Howard (R-Michigan) authored a "subject to the jurisdiction" clause into the 14th Amendment. Upon his introduction, the ff. are his remarks.

Part 4 (column 2), page 2890

Mr. Howard: The first amendment is to section one, declaring "that all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside...This is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.

Senator Trumbull of Illinois, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee concurred:

Part 4 (columns 1-2), page 2893

Mr. Trumbull: The provision is, "that all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens." That means "subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof"... What do we mean by "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States"? Not owing alliance to anybody else. That is what it means.

...It cannot be said of any...who owes allegiance, partial allegiance if you please, to some other Government that he is "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States."

...It is only those persons who completely within our jurisdiction, who are subject to our laws, that we think of making citizens; and there can be no objection to the proposition that such persons should be citizens."

Part 4 (columns 2-3), page 2895

Mr. Howard: I concur entirely with the honorable Senator from Illinois, in holding that the word "jurisdiction" as here employed, ought to be construed so as to imply a full and complete jurisdiction on the part of the United States...that is to say, the same jurisdiction in extent and quality as applies to every citizen of the United States now.

Then we have the dilemma of Law Legislated under an illegal Obama Presidency.

In Fletcher v. Peck, 10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 87 (1810)
the Supreme Court states @ 87
The principle asserted is that one legislature is competent to repeal any act which a former legislature was competent to pass, and that one legislature cannot abridge the powers of a succeeding legislature. The correctness of this principle so far as it respects general legislation cannot be controverted. But if an act be done under a law, a succeeding legislature cannot undo it. The past cannot be recalled by the most absolute power.”

By NOT having a legal US President in Office, not one single piece of Legislature signed by Obama is "under law" unless one can show that it was voted on by a 2/3 majority in both the House of Representatives and the US Senate and would have passed anyway, even if Obama were not in Office to exert the influence he had in the office of the US Presidency he usurped / illegally held and illegally maintained by fraud or its variants. Therefore, the objection that might be cited in Fletcher v. Peck, 10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 87 (1810) @87 that a succeeding Congress cannot void out the legislation of a preceding Congress -- when that legislation in the preceding Congress was an illegal action via a signing or benign neglect affirmation by an illegal Executive -- is therefore easily overcome.

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)@180 states that
“a law repugnant to the constitution IS VOID. . . .” and “in declaring what shall be the SUPREME law of the land, the CONSTITUTION itself is first mentioned;and not the laws of the United States generally,but those only which shall be made in PURSUANCE of the constitution,have that rank.”

I advocate that we follow the US Constitution and the advice of the US Supreme Court for such a crisis as this, and VOID OUT Obama's entire Presidency!!! Amen!!!

To all true U.S. Patriots, Obama is and remains unforgiven,

and we remain justified in both saying and doing this, because it is the appropriate response to an "alien national" who has usurped the Presidency, who is absolutely unable to produce -- and his own lawyers refuse to put forth under penalty of committing felonies to attest to its unfraudulent veracity -- evidence of a United States Natural Born Citizenship to Barack Hussein Obama II in ANY U.S. Court of Law. They won't even place his alleged Birth Certificate or Social Security Card before the Court as genuine under penalty of perjury. Under Bute v. Illinois or 333 U.S. 640 (1948) @ 653, WE THE PEOPLE have the right to demand Barack Obama PROVE the right to his claim of the U.S. Constitution authorizing him, a suspected illegal alien and known foreign national, to the powers and authority vested in that of a President of the United States...who saw fit to help re-write a foreign (Kenyan) Constitution to include Islamic Sharia compliances and to make himself once again one of its current citizens while occupying and claiming to be "First Citizen" in the Presidency of the United States.

Peace and Liberty. Semper Fidelis.

Saturday, December 20, 2014

The 10 Commandments, a New Translation of Exodus 20:1-21 in the AWPR Version with Juxtaposed KJV Texts

The 10 Commandments

 Exodus 20:1-21

King James Version (KJV) in aqua Blue
Alternate Word Pictures with Reiterations Version (AWPR) in Yellow
My Comments are in Green

1  And God spake all these words, saying,   (KJV)        

1)    And GOD    [as a commanding Judge]
       spoke      [in a legal tone and manner]
       all these commanding words, saying,

I am the Lord thy God, which have brought thee out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of bondage.   (KJV)  

2)    I (am) YHVeH, 
        your GOD    [your Commanding Judge] 
        who brought you forth and took you out
        from the land of 
        Mitzrayim - bad drainages [abundant marshlands] - Egypt,
        from the house - dwellingplace - temple
        of required obedient work performance - of [tyrannical] manual labor 

Thou shalt have no other gods before me.    (KJV)   

3)   There shall not be to you

      another - 
      another after (to the rear [as if in secret] or at a later time in place of)  -
      any other

      GOD  [Commanding Judge]

      raised up high so as to be 
      above - over - against - beside - before       Me.

4   Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image, or any likeness of any thing that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth.   (KJV)      

4)    You shall not fashion for yourself and follow -

        You shall not make for yourself and follow

        a hewn into shape image or idol

        or any likeness or form

        that (is) - which (is) - who (is)
        in the heavens 
           [as though he - she - it were at the top of an upward
            stairway or ladder  ascending into the heavens or Heaven itself]

       above - upward

       or that (is) - or which (is) - or who (is)
       in the land - in the Earth
       instead of or in exchange for  [GOD].  

Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them: for I the Lord thy God am a jealous God, visiting the iniquity of the fathers upon the children unto the third and fourth generation of them that hate me;   (KJV)   

5)    You shall not descend - wallow - prostrate   yourself,

        nor bow down to them,
        and you shall not   labor for - work for - serve    them.

        For I (am)  YHVeH, 

        your GOD      [your Commanding Judge],
        a Jealous - a Zealous   GOD  / a Jealous - a Zealous*
        Commanding Judge

        attentively and with care  

        making an inspection - making a visitation - visiting and overseeing

        the distortions - the crookedness - the bent or perverted [ways]

        of the fathers on [their] children,

        yoked upon the third and yoked upon the fourth    [generation]

        to those that oppose - that despise - that detest - that hate      Me.  


And shewing mercy unto thousands of them that love me, and keep my commandments.    (KJV)      

6)   And doing - making - fashioning - accomplishing

      loyal and faithful mercy and lovingkindness
      to thousands, 
      to those loving Me, 
      and to those 
         keeping guard over - watching and observing - giving heed to do
     My Commandments.

Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain; for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain.    (KJV) 

7)   You shall not take - lift up and carry away

       the Name of YHVeH 
       in vain - worthlessly and profanely - lightly or for no reason.

Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy.   (KJV)

8)   Attentively think about and remember

      Day, the Sabbath,  

      [i.e., the miraculous Day sign of the Shabbat (spelled Shin - Beth - Tav)

               as seen through the correct esoteric knowledge of Gematria
               is revealed as thus:

              Shin -  El Shaddai ('s)
              Beth -  House 
              Tav -    Sign

              (in the synonymous transposing of letters for phonetics of
                the Hebrew language continues as thus)

             Sha -    Looks at with interest and with favor to   (Cf. Genesis 4:4-5)

             Ba -      (the)  Way   
             T -         of the Sign (of the Cross) / of the final End Destination 
                           (which is again the Cross and Yeshua, the Centerpiece of
                             all time and the reason for the Creation of the Earth, 
                            Humanity, and this Universe  in which we now exist 
             In effect, the Sabbath Day, or the Day of SHa Ba T, since SHaBaT 
            was made FOR man, teaches us that we are to rest and have 
             a believing trust into the Cross, 
             and what Yeshua / Jesus did for us there, in offering Himself up 
             to take away the sins of the world for all who would trust 
             and believe into Him.  ]

       to keep it sacred - sanctified - holy - uncommon and consecrated.

Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work:    (KJV)       

9)   Six Days you shall 
      provide manual labor - required obedient work performance,
      and do - make -fashion - accomplish
      all your work - business
      [any labor from which you benefit from with tangible results].

10 But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates:    (KJV)     

10)    And the 7th Day is a SHaBaT 
          to YHVeH,
          your GOD   [your Commanding Judge].

          You shall not  make - do - perform
           all      work - business           
           [any labor from which you benefit from with tangible results]:

           you, and your son, and your daughter,
           your laborers - your work slaves, 
           your female servants - your female slaves,
           and your quadrupeds - your 4 footed animals - your herds,
           and your lodging sojourner 
                         [alien proselyte - foreign convert to the Faith]
           who is in your gates 
               [specifically that open area inside the gate which acts 
                 like a front yard or front court area to the from the main house 
                  or tent hosting the guest(s).]

11 For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day: wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day, and hallowed it.    (KJV)    

11)  For (in) 6 days   YHVeH   made - fashioned 
        the Heavens and the Earth,
        the Sea (and)  all that (is) in them.

       And He rested
    [as though deposited into one place]

       and stopped.

       On the 7th Day,

       YHVeH above made ready -  YHVeH above prepared
       (and) blessed   the Sabbath Day,
        and set it apart, making it sanctified and holy (as clean and pure).

12 Honour thy father and thy mother: that thy days may be long upon the land which the Lord thy God giveth thee.    (KJV)    

12)    Heavily esteem and honor  your father and your mother
         in response (to them) - in answer (to them)      in order that
         your days may be long - may be prolonged
         above the land 
              [on top of the Earth rather than as buried beneath]

         which continuously - that continuously   YHVeH is giving

             [giving as if placing a gift of honor, love, respect, cherishing, 
             upon the person or generation receiving it: as though each 
             generation were receiving a gift of being entrusted with the 
             land of Israel as a ring upon the hand, or a helmet for  fidelity
             upon the head, or a royal cloak of honor for warmth.]

13 Thou shalt not kill.  (KJV)      
13)  You shall not murder, intentionally manslaughter, recklessly 
         slay or kill (with malice aforethought).   


14 Thou shalt not commit adultery.  (KJV)       

14)   You shall not commit adultery - You shall not have sexual relations
         with whom / who  is not your spouse.

15 Thou shalt not steal.    (KJV) 

15)   You shall not steal - kidnap - burglarize.

16 Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbour.   (KJV)  

16)   You shall not answer - testify - afflict  - humble - oppress
         a friend - a companion - a neighbor - one with whom you 
         associate with

         as a lying - false - deceiving       witness /
         as a seducing witness leading astray.


17 Thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's house, thou shalt not covet thy neighbour's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is thy neighbour's.   (KJV)   

17)   You shall not  desire - delight in and lust after - covet
         your friend's - your companion's - your neighbor's 

         You shall not desire - delight in and lust after - covet
         your friend's - your companion's - your neighbor's 
         wife     [or "woman"],
         nor his laborer - his work servant - his work slave,
         nor his female slave - female servant,
         nor his ox or bull,
         nor his donkey  or his ass,
         nor all or anything         who is - which is
         your friend's - your companion's - your neighbor's.  

18 And all the people saw the thunderings, and the lightnings, and the noise of the trumpet, and the mountain smoking: and when the people saw it, they removed, and stood afar off.    (KJV)    

18)    And all the people saw and beheld 
          while looking at and inspecting:
          the voices - the sounds - the noises - the thunderclaps
          with the flaming torch pillars of fire
          [that stretched straight up into the heavens: 
            "the mountain burning with fire into the heart of 
              the heavens" - Deuteronomy 4:11];

         and the sound of the ram's horn;
         and the mount - hill - mountain  smoking
         [as a furnace chunneling up with thick dark smoke ,
           even as the country of Sodom was in Genesis 19:28].

        And the people saw and beheld 
        while looking at and inspecting,
        and they were sifted and shaking with [uncontrollable]

        And they stood   [as if propped up and in a standing place]
        remotely - far away - (separately and)  at a (good) distance.


19 And they said unto Moses, Speak thou with us, and we will hear: but let not God speak with us, lest we die.   (KJV)   

19)   And they said to Moses,**
         'You declare - command - speak  with us,
          and we will listen intently and hear;
          and (do) not let   GOD  [the Commanding Judge]
          declare - command - speak with us, 
          lest we (physically) die!'

20 And Moses said unto the people, Fear not: for God is come to prove you, and that his fear may be before your faces, that ye sin not.   (KJV)  

20)   And said Moses  to the people,
                'Do not be fearing 
                 [to the point of being poured out and demoralized];
                 for because     in order that - on account of
                 to test and prove  (what kind of quality [you are]),
                 GOD  [the Commanding Judge]      
                 has come - has entered [ into this dimension] - has arrived
                 so that His fear may be upon your faces
                 that you may not - that you might not
                 miss and fall short - sin
                 [and be found guilty of a bad quality,
                   to be fully rejected  in the testing of you].

21 And the people stood afar off, and Moses drew near unto the thick darkness where God was.   (KJV)  

21)    And the people stood  
         [as if propped up and in a standing place]
         remotely - far away - (separately) at a (good) distance;

         and Moses drew near and approached the thick darkness
         [as "the mountain burned with fire to the heart of the
           heavens"  - Deuteronomy 4:11]

         where GOD was there, than at that time.


 Disclaimer:  The Alternate Word Pictures with Reiterations (AWPR) translation, translation mine, should be used as a Bible Study Aid only, so as to help the reader / user in their Bible Studying to clarify context and Scriptural Intent, and to get a fuller or more complete context and understanding into the English from out of the ancient  Hebrew in which this Old Testament passage was first written.   Thanks.  -- Brianroy



*  -   Verse 5
GOD tells Moses that HE, YHVeH, is a Jealous GOD.  The word for "Jealous" is QaNaH, and is also translated as “zealous”.  As a noun in the first 5 books of the Bible (the Torah, the Pentateuch), QaNaH is used of GOD in the sense of His holding property rights over His people.   That is, the people who GOD redeems are His Property and belong to Him (for which reason the Apostles often referred to themselves as His slaves as well as being His children by faith through Christ Jesus).   Alternatively, in relation with the Biblical Theology GOD gives in His ONLY Holy Book, the Holy Bible (Old and New Testaments), QaNaH alternatively can be used and translated in relation to purchasing or buying.   Clearly this is synonymous to the very act of Salvation.  GOD the WORD, temporarily and in their flesh, redeemed His people Israel in the Exodus; and when YHVeH later incarnated into the person we come to know as Jesus Christ, Yeshua H’Messhiach, GOD the Son, just before He yielded up His Spirit at the Cross, YHVeH Messhiach declared what has been translated for us in the New Testament as “tetelestai” – “Paid in full”.   All who believe into Yeshua / Jesus with trusting faith and what He did at the Cross, do have all sins bought and paid for by this Jealous / Zealous GOD, YHVeH, He who spoke with Moses at the cleft in the Rock.

 Indeed, the Apostle Paul repeatedly reminds us that in Christ, we are bought with a price.    

In Gematria, QaNaH holds a value of 151: this NAME of GOD also shows us His identity. 
 At 151, He is QOLaYaH (Qoph-Vav-Lamed-Yod-He) – “the Voice of YHVeH”, who alternatively identified as “the Word of YHVeH.”

  At 151, He is ELY’AM (Alef-Lamed-Yod-Ayin-Mem)  - (the) GOD of the People. Under the parallel door of transliteration substitution of the "I' for 'Y", we read this as ELIAM.  This opens another parallel door of knowledge, because the Scripture identifies a man by the name of Eliam who was the father of Bath Sheba, the daughter of Sheba (a black woman who was the mother of a child with King David that gave Israel its King Solomon); and this Eliam, the Scripture also calls, Amiel, by using a transliteration substitution of the Hebrew letter Ayin for the Hebrew letter of Alef, and Alef for Ayin.  AMIEL (Ayin – Mem – Yod – Alef – Lamed):  the People of GOD, is alternatively translated as "My kinsman is EL" or "My kinsman is [my] GOD".   Through AMIEL, we see:  the "father" of the bride, the bride which represents the Church;  we see the role of the Groom, the Husband to be, who is Christ Jesus, Yeshua H'Messhiach; and we see the role of one who is a "brother" or "near kinsman" who is also Christ.  In effect, Scripture assigns a role of Trinity to Christ in His relationship to the Church, to those who would be or are "the People of GOD"; as well as being the (whom I believe to be 'elevated to")  second person of the Trinity, as GOD the Son.     

  It is He who forms the light, and creates darkness; who makes peace, and creates calamity (or evil).” (Isaiah 45:7)   Why?  Because at 151, He is NaQA (Nun – Qof – Alef) – “Clean and Pure”.  In the Aramaic, this spelling is pronounced as NeQEe.     

When NaQA is rearranged, it points us to His Scourging, His walk to and time upon the Cross, in which at 151, He was caused to groanNA’aQ (Nun – Alef – Qof), which is a rearranging or disorder of what is already pure.   In the Beginning, GOD created Light (which represents purity and order), and GOD also created Evening – Erev, which is a darkness and disorder.  When GOD created the Darkness at the Beginning, He foreknew that Man whom He would create, would rearrange what was orderly and fall away.  And in knowing this, He also took to Himself the Redemption of Man upon Himself even before Man was created, and after the value of 151, subsumed Ma’APeL (Mem-Alef-Pe-Lamed), he subsumed the darkness of man’s own desires in which man’s will would (rebelliously) be set in place, as though man’s desires were the setting of a sun creating darkness, or a territory in dark (canyon or heavily overcast) shadows void of daylight. 

At 151, GOD who is the Jealous / Zealous GOD, is He who rides the SUPaH (Samekh – Alef – Pe – He), the storm clouds of the Tempest  (Ezekiel 1:4ff., Job 38:1).

At 151, YHVeH who is the Jealous / Zealous GOD, is the One who by an exhale breath, an EPhA (Alef- Pe- Ayin)  created the Universe and its constellations, whose existence out of EPA(h), what was as "worthless" or nothing, are as though small models almost without weight  in the Hand of the Almighty (Isaiah 40:12-25). 

At 151, YHVeH is YiSMaKYaHU, the sustainer of all things by the will of His power as His name, “YH will sustain” implies. 

At 151, we also see that in the End of Days, YHVeH will ASIP / ASYPh (Alef – Samekh – Yod – Pe), He will gather in His crops.   The crops of YHVeH as revealed by Gematria in 151 are those who are the AMIEL (Ayin – Mem – Yod – Alef – Lamed):  the People of GOD.  Who, in the End Times He will rapture:  He will cause them to be put to CHiPaZON (Chet – Pe – Zayin – Vav – Nun), a hasty flight or a (snatching up and) going away in haste.

 ** - verse 19
 Moses was taken by the people of Israel, who probably averaged between 5' to 5' 4" tall ,  to be both a giant at 8'9" tall
 and their champion, the biggest and tallest among them  who would
go up to GOD and intervene in behalf of Israel. 

Centuries later after these above events, in the Land of Israel, when the more than 7' tall King Saul had his turn to be champion, because he too stood head and shoulders above the rest of those of the tribes of Israel,  he at 7 feet plus  faced THE  literal Goliath at 11 feet 6 1/2 inches tall, or something to the effect of   someone at least 4 feet taller than he was.   At that time,  placing King Saul at 7 plus feet would almost have been like unto the placing of Robert Pershing Wadlow next  to his father for size comparatives.  Robert, by the way, achieved the height of  8'9" and for a time  was the same height as Moses, but Robert died after obtaining a couple inches more.  Below is Robert and his father in 1940.