Welcome! Jesus Christ is my LORD and Savior! Romans 10:9-10,13; John 3:16
At this site, I discuss politics with a Right-Wing Conservative view that is pro-environmental, is in the defense of the freedom that is our birthright, and will go into detail discussing Conservative Fundamental Protestant Christian Theology that is pro-Zionist.
At times I will post some poems or other literary things I write, and may often post various entertainment or educational videos that I find of interest, and hope you will, too.
Thank you for coming, and feel free to also visit Frontsight or one of the recommended site links. You may also submit comments through the moderation process, or simply vote in a check off box below each article. ------------------------------------------------------------------- In the Year of our LORD Jesus Christ / A.D. 2013
Statement of Principle: Barack Obama is NOT a United States Natural Born Citizen, and illegally holds office.
"No Person except a Natural Born Citizen…shall be eligible to the Office of President...." US Constitution: Article 2, section 1, Clause 5
The Original Constitutional Intent of a Natural Born Citizen at the time and era it was written is defined in this: that a child is born to a US CITIZEN Father at the Time of Birth, on US Soil or exclusive US Sovereignty, (this includes those born upon a US Flagship on direct water passage in International Waters IF it is so done between soil of the United States to soil of the United States); and that the child has NO OTHER CITIZENSHIP(S) OR ALLEGIANCE(S) FROM BIRTH TO AGE 21.
The Founders utilized John Locke for this definition:“This holds in all the laws a man is under, whether natural or civil. Is a man under the law of nature? What made him free of that law? what gave him a free disposing of his property, according to his own will, within the compass of that law? I answer, a state of maturity wherein he might be supposed capable to know that law, that so he might keep his actions within the bounds of it. When he has acquired that state, he is presumed to know how far that law is to be his guide, and how far he may make use of his freedom, and so comes to have it; till then, some body else must guide him, who is presumed to know how far the law allows a liberty. If such a state of reason, such an age of discretion made him free, the same shall make his son free too. Is a man under the law of England? What made him free of that law? that is, to have the liberty to dispose of his actions and possessions according to his own will, within the permission of that law? A capacity of knowing that law; which is supposed by that law, at the age of one and twenty years, and in some cases sooner. If this made the father free, it shall make the son free too. Till then we see the law allows the son to have no will, but he is to be guided by the will of his father or guardian, who is to understand for him. And if the father die, and fail to substitute a deputy in his trust; if he hath not provided a tutor, to govern his son, during his minority, during his want of understanding, the law takes care to do it; some other must govern him, and be a will to him, till he hath attained to a state of freedom, and his understanding be fit to take the government of his will. But after that, the father and son are equally free as much as tutor and pupil after nonage; equally subjects of the same law together, without any dominion left in the father over the life, liberty, or estate of his son, whether they be only in the state and under the law of nature, or under the positive laws of an established government.” John Locke, Second Treatise on Government, Chapter 6: ‘Of Paternal Power’ §. 59 http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/01/john-locke-second-teatise-of-government.html
In May of 2009, Barack Obama and the Government of the United States of America officially recognized Kogelo, Kenya, as the birth place of the putative President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama II.It was attended by U.S. Ambassador Michael Ranneberger.The official Kenyan Government memo, Compiled by: Agwanda, J.O., ASDD and Comissioned by: Machage, T. N . , SDD states very clearly and absolutely unmistakably that: “This was to honour the birthplace of President Barack Obama and re-dedicate the tomb of Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., the president's late father.” http://www.wnd.com/files/110525nsisbulletin.pdf
Under Constitutional Intent of the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Article 2.1.5, the successful US Government Attorney of later Wong Kim Ark fame shows us that the Paternal Link (that through the Father's Status) is essential in determining who is or is NOT a United States Natural Born Citizen: “Birth, therefore, does not ipso facto confer citizenship, and is essential in order that a person be a native or natural born citizen of the United States, that his father be at the time of the birth of such person a citizen thereof, or in the case he be illegitimate, that his mother be a citizen thereof at the time of such birth. – GEORGE D. COLLINS, SAN FRANCISCO, CAL.” http://www.scribd.com/doc/19071886/Are-Persons-Born-Within-the-United-States-Ipso-Facto-Citizens-Thereof-George-D-Collins
“…at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was ...a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.” http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/does_barack_obama_have_kenyan_citizenship.html {link since removed} Rep. A. Smyth (VA), House of Representatives, December 1820:When we apply the term “citizens” to the inhabitants of States, it means those who are members of the political community. The civil law determined the condition of the son by that of the father. A man whose father was not a citizen was allowed to be a perpetual inhabitant, but not a citizen, unless citizenship was conferred on him." Since Barack Obama depends upon "operation of law" to claim citizenship status, he is NOT a United States NATURAL born citizen, and fails to meet Constitutionality.
Ex Parte Bain, 121 U.S. 1 (1887) @ 12 http://supreme.justia.com/us/121/1/case.html "It is never to be forgotten that in the construction of the language of the Constitution here relied on, as indeed in all other instances where construction becomes necessary, we are to place ourselves as nearly as possible in the condition of the men who framed that instrument."
GIBBONS V. OGDEN, 22 U. S. 1 (1824) @ 188-189 http://supreme.justia.com/us/22/1/case.html states: " ...the enlightened patriots who framed our Constitution, and the people who adopted it, must be understood to have employed words in their natural sense, and to have intended what they have said. If, from the imperfection of human language, there should be serious doubts respecting the extent of any given power, it is a well settled rule that the objects for which it was given, especially when those objects are expressed in the instrument itself, should have great influence in the construction."
Thomas Jefferson, in his letter to William Johnson, dated June 12, 1823 from Monticello, wrote: "On every question of construction [of the Constitution] let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or intended against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed."
Holmes v. Jennison, 39 U.S. (14 Peters) 540 (1840)@ 570-571 http://supreme.justia.com/us/39/540/case.html “In expounding the Constitution of the United States, every word must have its due force and appropriate meaning, for it is evident from the whole instrument that no word was unnecessarily used or needlessly added. The many discussions which have taken place upon the construction of the Constitution have proved the correctness of this proposition and shown the high talent, the caution, and the foresight of the illustrious men who framed it. Every word appears to have been weighed with the utmost deliberation, and its force and effect to have been fully understood. No word in the instrument, therefore, can be rejected as superfluous or unmeaning, and this principle of construction applies …”
By having a Foreign National Father, and a foreign citizenship at birth and retained to his 23rd birthday, and / or a renunciation of US Citizenship declared by his mother to the US Consulate and signed under oath on August 13 of 1968 to declare her son absolved of US Citizenship for an Indonesian one,http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/05/orly-taitz-still-standing-new-lawsuits.html
Elk v. Wilkins, 112 US 94 (1884) @ 101-102 states that: "The main object of the opening sentence of the fourteenth amendment was …to put it beyond doubt that all persons, white or black, and whether formerly slaves or not, born or naturalized in the United States, and OWING NO ALLEGIANCE TO ANY ALIEN POWER, should be citizens of the United States and of the state in which they reside. Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall. 36, 73; Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303, 306."
Obama owed allegiance to both the United Kingdom (Great Britain) and Kenya at birth, regardless if he was born in the US or not. Only by complete dishonesty can anyone label the man a qualified occupant of the Presidency. Ipso facto and de jure, he is not legally President of the United States, and his entire occupancy is legally voidable. His short form is so easily reproductive forgery, it might as well say Mickey Hussein Mouse as it does here: http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x13/Mactographer/birth_certificate_2-1.jpg
it was almost conclusive in the journalistic sense, that the only thing on file in Hawaii as regards Obama is a data entry of : "Obama II, Barack Hussein, Male...." instead of any United States Birth Certificate or Certification of Live Birth.
"The burden of establishing a delegation of power to the United States,or the prohibition of power to the States,is upon those making the claim." Bute v. Illinois, 333 U.S. 640 @653 (1948)
That means it is upon Obama and/or his lawyers to produce Court admissible documents establishing his birth identity with location and witnesses to the birth (cf. Nguyen v. INS 533 US 53 (2001) @ 54,62), - -
Nguyen v. INS 533 US 53 (2001) @ 54,62 http://supreme.justia.com/us/533/53/ @ 54 : “The mother's relation is verifiable from the birth itself and is documented by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses to the birth.” @62:” In the case of the mother, the relation is verifiable from the birth itself. The mother's status is documented in most instances by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses who attest to her having given birth.” - - as well as having a US Citizen father age 21 or above at the time of birth.
John Jay’s letter to George Washington, July 25, 1787 states: “Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government; and to declare expressly that the commander in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen.”
It is clear that a “natural born citizen” in John Jay’s intent is someone WITHOUT dual or multiple nationalities, but has only one since birth: that of the US by both parents and geography, and NO OTHER.
In 1874, the US Supreme Court ruled that as it regards Common Law, that if we follow that model, not only did a US Citizen Father have to be present to make one a US Natural Born Citizen, but a US Citizen Mother also. And that formula of Common Law is also operative vice versa in the phrase: “all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens “, that without a US Citizen Father, you could NOT be defined as a United States Natural Born Citizen, PERIOD!!!
“At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.” Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874) @167 (see also how Justia.com tried to bury this key reference case @ http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/12/justiagate_natural_born_supreme_court_citations_disappear.html )
On June 6, 1951, President Truman signed the 1951 British Treaty between the United States of America and the United Kingdom / Great Britain. This Treaty, ratified by the United States Senate, took effect on September 7, 1952. This Treaty authorizes the British Consulate to register the birth of British Subjects born in the United States of America, establishing a British jurisdiction over US Born Citizens of a British Citizen parent or parents. The British consulate of the jurisdiction of the United States where they were found, including the territory and later state of Hawaii, and were thus authorized to give British passports to those like Barack Hussein Obama II as a British subject and United Kingdom and Colonies Citizen at the petition of a British Citizen parent, like Barack Hussein Obama I's request (Obama's father). http://travel.state.gov/law/legal/treaty/treaty_1507.html (See also 8 USC 1101 (a) (15) (F) (i) http://www.gpoaccess.gov/uscode/ )
While Obama declares he was born in Hawaii http://www.scribd.com/doc/56732637/Obama-Declares-He-Was-Born-in-Hawaii neither Obama, nor his lawyers, nor the US Attorneys have ever produced one shred of solid identifying evidence of the man's identity into Court Evidence in a Court of Law. They refuse to enter his Birth Certificate or Certification of Live Birth, whether long or short, because both are forgeries. Even though under 333 US 640, Bute v. Illinois (1948) @ 653 and 533 US 53, Nguyen v. INS (2001) @ 54,62 they are so required to produce into Court's Evidence, submitting them as authentic under penalty of perjury to the Courts. IT NEVER HAPPENED because they are knowingly fraudulent documents.
Obama can therefore be required by Law to produce an authentic US Hospital Birth Certificate into Court Evidence, something he has NEVER done, nor have in lawyers remotely done in the one reference they made to pro-Obama blogs in Hollister v. Soetoro Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-02254-JR.What is it that Robert Bauer of Perkins Coie offered the Court the one time he even referred to substantiation in Hollister v. Soetoro Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-02254-JR? Legal FRAUD upon the Court.
“Fraud on the Court is conduct: 1) on the part of an officer of the Court; 2) that is directed to the judicial machinery itself; 3) that is intentionally false, willfully blind to the truth, or is in reckless disregard for the truth; 4) that is a positive averment or a concealment when one is under duty to disclose; 5) that deceives the Court.” Workman v. Bell, 245 F.3d 849 (6th Circuit 2001) @ 852
{{{Quote from Hollister v. Soetoro, Footnote 1: }}}1 President Obama has publicly produced a certified copy of a birth certificate showing that he was born on August 4, 1961, in Honolulu Hawaii. See, e.g., Factcheck.org, “Born in the U.S.A.: The truth about Obama’s birth certificate,” available at http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html (concluding that the birth certificate is genuine, and noting a contemporaneous birth announcement published in a Honolulu newspaper). Hawaii officials have publicly verified that they have President Obama’s “original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.” See “Certified,” Honolulu Star Bulletin, Oct. 31, 2008. This Court can take judicial notice of these public news reports. See The Washington Post v. Robinson,935 F.2d 282, 291 (D.C. Cir. 1991); Agee v. Muskie, 629 F.2d 80, 81 n.1, 90 (D.C. Cir. 1980). {{{Unquote}}}
Snopes.com, another pro-Obama partisan propaganda site, self-patting themselves on how factual they are when it comes to Obama, couldn’t even cite the correct alleged obstetrician it claimed delivered Obama. When the Obama forged Certification of Live Birth Long Form came out, their facts that“Rodney T. West delivered Obama in Hawaii”were cast aside as fables they promulgated to the gullible masses for over 2 years. http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=295265
The Office of the White House Press Secretary linked journalists and other interested parties to what they called an authentic Obama Short Form Certification of Live Birth, as vetted by Snopes.com. Unfortunately, the link went to Ron Polland’s made from Template Scratch openly attributed forgery, of which Polland said he was the creator. In other words, the White House sourced themselves in a genuine copy of a known public forgery which url even contained Dr. Polland’s previous internet pseudonym in the url / jpg address itself. http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/BO_Birth_Certificate.jpg
Obama also uses an identity theft Social Security Number of a now deceased person 042-68-4425 http://www.scribd.com/doc/47560424/Affidavit-Regarding-Obamas-Social-Security-Numbers-Susan-Daniels for someone born in 1890 AND ISSUED IN CONNECTICUT in 1977-1979 as if a Tax ID number for most all his adult life. It is time for Congress to empower a special prosecutor and move to Criminal Filings against him, beginning with a subpoena duces tecum of his alleged identity documents under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedures 17(c) and "call his bluff".
In matter of fact, my quoting the Kenyan Media by the same standards as Bauer’s use of “The Washington Post v. Robinson,935 F.2d 282, 291 (D.C. Cir. 1991); Agee v. Muskie, 629 F.2d 80, 81 n.1, 90 (D.C. Cir. 1980)” is de facto and de jure not only just as relevant, but MORE relevant, as it sources a nation of birth, and a national citizenship at birth as jus soli in Kenya by Government confirmation, where the Hawaii newspaper announcements neither address nationality nor location at birth, only that a birth somewhere in the world occurred for people alleged to live at so-an-so an address.
The Nairobi Kenya Eastern Standard is the source of the Birther Movement, substantiated by other African Media and Kenya’s own Government Officials in Public Statement of fact in Transcript. Of primary concern is the Nairobi Kenya Eastern Standard dated as Sunday, June 27, 2004. Its headline reads: “Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate”
The first line reads:“Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama,appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.”
There are no other living witnesses besides Barack's step-grandmother, who says she saw him birthed, and she says THAT was in Kenya! http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=107524 and that claim was vetted twice by Kenya's Parliament, one of which in March of 2010!!!“
NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OFFICIAL REPORT Thursday, 25th March, 2010 The House met at 2.30 p.m. p. 31 ...2nd paragraph [Mr. Orengo, Minister of Lands of the nation of Kenya, speaking]: "...how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American,become the President of America?It is because they did away with exclusion." http://www.scribd.com/doc/29758466/RDRAFT25
In matter of fact, various Secretaries of States will declare to the effect that the States have no right to verify if a candidate running for President is even a US Citizen, let alone qualified.
It is a legal fact that Natural Born Citizenship is required to be a US President, which Obama does NOT have... NOT having the proper US Citizenship Credentials to produce into evidence in a COURT of Law, and especially by NOT BEING a UNITED STATES NATURAL BORN CITIZEN by the same principles of primogeniture and entail in regard to a sole US Citizenship (i.e., because he has NO US Citizen Father to Naturally take the place in Society of). Hence, he is a Usurper of the US Presidency, and an active criminal regularly committing felonies every time he acts or speaks in the fraudulently obtained office of the US Presidency.
Obama's own Mother declared Obama Jr. lost his US Citizenship as of August 13, 1968
Obama's Mother formally reported on her son so as to declare Obama Jr. lost his US Citizenship as of August 13, 1968 and denounced him officially before a Department of State Representative and signed such official documentation, intending that he had officially become a permanent Indonesian Citizen, absolved of any claim to a US nationality.
Obama's mother signed under oath on the back page of Form FS-299 of 7-64, following the instructions:
"I have not (and no other person included or to be included in the passport or documentation has), since acquiring United States citizenship, been naturalized as a citizen of a foreign state, taken an oath or made an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state…
{If any of the above-mentioned acts or conditions have been performed by or apply to the applicant, or to any other person included in the passport or documentation, the portion of which applies should be struck out , and a supplementary explanatory statement under oath (or affirmation) by the person to whom the portion is applicable should be attached and made a part of this application.}
Ann Dunham wrote Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah) and struck his name out to indicate that he was legally to no longer be a United States Citizen, and the document stood to apply all relevant passages that could apply to a 7 year old who lost US Citizenship by naturalization to Indonesia with a renunciation of his allegiance and renunciation of his citizenship by both he and his mother and his step-father for him.
Again, his own mother on August 13, 1968, before a Department of State consulate, denounced her son Barack Hussein Obama as having foreign allegiances and foreign naturalization to Indonesia, and signed to this effect in form FS-277, writing and striking his name out.
We must remember that:
“[T]HE INESTIMABLE HERITAGE OF CITIZENSHIP IS NOT TO BE CONCEDED TO THOSE WHO SEEK TO AVAIL THEMSELVES OF IT UNDER PRESSURE OF A PARTICULAR EXIGENCY....” CHIN BAK KAN V. UNITED STATES, 186 U.S. 193 (1902) @ 200 We do not need a Presidential candidate or President so badly, that we have to go outside the pool of two citizen parents at their birth on US Soil for a President, regardless of the candidate's ethnicity. The DNC yielded to a known unqualified candidate as a means of desperation, as if the pressure of exigency to get their Party the Presidency in 2008, and discarded the sacred trust of the People of the United States in upholding the US Constitution, by offering the most powerful office in the world to a United Kingdom and Colonies foreign national turned resident of the United States who may or may not even have as much as a secondary US Citizenship under the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952's statutory law, if he indeed was born in Kenya as the media and Government of Kenya claims.
Under Original Intent and interpretation of the 14th Amendment, Obama fails to qualify as a 14th Amendment Citizen without a US Citizen Father and by having foreign dual or multi-national citizenship at birth:
The Congressional Globe, 1st session,May 30, 1866
The debate on the first section of the 14th Amendment
Senator Jacob Howard (R-Michigan) authored a "subject to the jurisdiction" clause into the 14th Amendment.Upon his introduction, the ff. are his remarks.
Part 4(column 2), page 2890
Mr. Howard:The first amendment is to section one, declaring "that all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside...This is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States.This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens,who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.
Senator Trumbull of Illinois, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee concurred:
Part 4 (columns 1-2), page 2893
Mr. Trumbull:The provision is, "that all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens." That means "subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof"... What do we mean by "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States"? Not owing alliance to anybody else. That is what it means.
...It cannot be said of any...who owes allegiance, partial allegiance if you please, to some other Government that he is "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States."
...It is only those persons who completely within our jurisdiction, who are subject to our laws, that we think of making citizens; and there can be no objection to the proposition that such persons should be citizens."
Part 4 (columns 2-3), page 2895
Mr. Howard: I concur entirely with the honorable Senator from Illinois, in holding that the word "jurisdiction" as here employed, ought to be construed so as to imply a full and complete jurisdiction on the part of the United States...that is to say, the same jurisdiction in extent and quality as applies to every citizen of the United States now.
Then we have the dilemma of Law Legislated under an illegal Obama Presidency.
In Fletcher v. Peck, 10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 87 (1810) the Supreme Court states @ 87 “The principle asserted is that one legislature is competent to repeal any act which a former legislature was competent to pass, and that one legislature cannot abridge the powers of a succeeding legislature. The correctness of this principle so far as it respects general legislation cannot be controverted. But if an act be done under a law, a succeeding legislature cannot undo it. The past cannot be recalled by the most absolute power.”
By NOT having a legal US President in Office, not one single piece of Legislature signed by Obama is "under law" unless one can show that it was voted on by a 2/3 majority in both the House of Representatives and the US Senate and would have passed anyway, even if Obama were not in Office to exert the influence he had in the office of the US Presidency he usurped / illegally held and illegally maintained by fraud or its variants. Therefore, the objection that might be cited in Fletcher v. Peck, 10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 87 (1810) @87 that a succeeding Congress cannot void out the legislation of a preceding Congress -- when that legislation in the preceding Congress was an illegal action via a signing or benign neglect affirmation by an illegal Executive -- is therefore easily overcome.
Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)@180 states that “a law repugnant to the constitution IS VOID. . . .” and “in declaring what shall be the SUPREME law of the land, the CONSTITUTION itself is first mentioned;and not the laws of the United States generally,but those only which shall be made in PURSUANCE of the constitution,have that rank.”
I advocate that we follow the US Constitution and the advice of the US Supreme Court for such a crisis as this, and VOID OUT Obama's entire Presidency!!! Amen!!!
To all true U.S. Patriots, Obama is and remains unforgiven,
and we remain justified in both saying and doing this, because it is the appropriate response to an "alien national" who has usurped the Presidency, who is absolutely unable to produce -- and his own lawyers refuse to put forth under penalty of committing felonies to attest to its unfraudulent veracity -- evidence of a United States Natural Born Citizenship to Barack Hussein Obama II in ANY U.S. Court of Law. They won't even place his alleged Birth Certificate or Social Security Card before the Court as genuine under penalty of perjury. Under Bute v. Illinois or 333 U.S. 640 (1948) @ 653, WE THE PEOPLE have the right to demand Barack Obama PROVE the right to his claim of the U.S. Constitution authorizing him, a suspected illegal alien and known foreign national, to the powers and authority vested in that of a President of the United States...who saw fit to help re-write a foreign (Kenyan) Constitution to include Islamic Sharia compliances and to make himself once again one of its current citizens while occupying and claiming to be "First Citizen" in the Presidency of the United States.
Disclaimer: The Alternate Word Pictures with Reiterations
(AWPR) translation should be used as a Bible Study Aid only, and it is
recommended that a direct literal translation or the King James Bible be used
for regular and ecclesiastical purposes, and that the AWPR be used in
association only as a Bible study aid so as to help the reader / user in their
Bible Studying to clarify context and Scriptural Intent. Thanks.
-- Brianroy
Acts 2
King James Version (KJV) Alternate Word Pictures with Reiterations (AWPR)
Alternate Word Pictures with Reiterations (AWPR) will appear in yellow
below the King James Version (KJV), and my comments in green.
1 And when
the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one
place.(KJV)
1) And in the fulfilling of the 50th
Day –
And in the fulfilling of the Day of Pentecost
[also
known as Shavuot],
they were universally – wholly – all together beyond opinion,
and moved in expectation (as with one mind) upon the same.
(AWPR)
2 And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of
a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting.(KJV)
2)And
(it) came into being (that) suddenly and without warning,
out of Heaven a resounding echo sounding exactly like
violent blowing as a rushing mighty wind
(in resounding echoes);
and it completely filled all the House
where they were sitting down. (AWPR)
3 And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like
as of fire, and it sat upon each of them.(KJV)
3)And
to them, was seen –
perceived with the eyes and looked upon,
tongues, as though (they) were fire,
being separated into parts divided up and distributed;
and on each and every one of them separately
it was caused to sit down and rest. (AWPR)
4 And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and
began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance.(KJV)
4) And
they were all of the Holy Spirit made completely full,
as filled to the brim,
and (they) began to talk at random in different other
languages / tongues
as according to the Spirit
Whom gave of His own accord and good will
to them to utter – declare intelligible, concise
and knowable words from.(AWPR)
5 And there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, devout
men, out of every nation under heaven.(KJV)
5)Were
then, in Jerusalem,
residing and living in permanent
dwelling-places
devout men of the Jews from every ethnic
nation
under the Heaven,
(devout men of the Jews) who properly took up
and
carried away (the faith of their namesake
[as GOD fearers, and “the Praise of YH”]).
(AWPR)
6 Now when this was noised abroad, the multitude
came together, and were confounded, because that every man heard them speak in
his own language.(KJV)
6)This
sound then, coming into existence,
the multitude (the whole fullness of the
people)
came and were poured together as excited,
amazed, confused,
because they heard into each one,
speaking their own dialect. (AWPR)
7 And they were all amazed and marvelled, saying one
to another, Behold, are not all these which speak Galilaeans?(KJV)
7)Then all were standing out
(as though they were beside
themselves)
[as though they were out of their
minds
having an hallucinatory out of body experience],
and were struck with admiration and
astonishment,
laying down definite words,
saying up alongside and with one
another,
‘Behold! Look and see!
Are these certainly not those Galileans
speaking at random?’
8 And how hear we every man in our own tongue,
wherein we were born?(KJV)
8)And,
‘By what means –In what manner or way
(do) we, each and every one
separately,
hear them speaking in the private
and particular dialect
of us in which we
were born?' (AWPR)
9 Parthians, and Medes, and Elamites, and the
dwellers in Mesopotamia, and in Judaea, and Cappadocia, in Pontus, and Asia,(KJV)
9)Parthians
and Medes and Elamites and those
residing and living in permanent
dwelling-places: Mesopotamia?
both Judea and Cappodocia;
Pontus and Asia;
(AWPR)
10 Phrygia, and Pamphylia, in Egypt, and in the
parts of Libya about Cyrene, and strangers of Rome, Jews and proselytes,(KJV)
10)Both
Phrygia and Pamphylia,
Egypt and the sides of Libya down –
against Cyrene;
and the Roman sojourners / strangers /
resident aliens
in – among the
people,
both Jews and
proselytes
[foreigners adopted
into the faith and tribes of Israel].
(AWPR)
11 Cretes and Arabians, we do hear them speak in our
tongues the wonderful works of God.(KJV)
11)Cretans
and Arabians:
we attentively hear – listen to them
speaking at random
in our own
languages
the gloriously great
wonderful works
and deeds of GOD?(AWPR)
12 And they were all amazed, and were in doubt,
saying one to another, What meaneth this?(KJV)
12)All
then, were standing out
(as though beside themselves / as though
having an
out of body
experience [and being out of their minds])
and
were thoroughly without resource
in how
to grasp it all – were perplexed,
others of the like
kind up alongside and with others
of the like kind
(were) laying down definite words, saying,
‘What, perhaps, would you have in mind
and desire this to be?’(AWPR)
13 Others mocking said, These men are full of new
wine.(KJV)
13)Then
different others joked- scoffed – mocked – derided
(and) laid down
definite words, said,
‘Because of sweet
wine are they filled up.’
(AWPR)
14 But Peter, standing up with the eleven, lifted up
his voice, and said unto them, Ye men of Judaea, and all ye that dwell at
Jerusalem, be this known unto you, and hearken to my words:(KJV)
14)Then standing (as though set in place),
Peter with the Eleven raised –hoisted up
upon
the voice of him:
[that is, those with
Peter in unison repeated Peter’s words,
as a group
megaphoning what he was saying ]
‘Men, Judeans, and all who live and reside
in Jerusalem
in permanent dwelling-places.
Let this be made known to you,
and into the ear
receive (listen intently),
hear the spoken
words of me.
(AWPR)
15 For these are not drunken, as ye suppose, seeing
it is but the third hour of the day.(KJV)
15)For
these are certainly not drunk and carousing
as
you suppose or take (them to be);
because
it is the 3rd hour of the Day [ca. 9 a.m. ];
(AWPR)
16 But this is that which was spoken by the prophet
Joel;(KJV)
16)But it is this thing
being spoken through the
prophet Joel: (AWPR)
17 And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith
God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh: and your sons and your
daughters shall prophesy, and your young men shall see visions, and your old
men shall dream dreams:(KJV)
17) ‘And it shall be in the Last Days,’
says GOD laying down
definite words,
‘I will pour / spill out from the
Spirit of Me
upon all flesh,
and the sons of you and the daughters of you will foretell things to come;
and the young men of you
will see – look at – perceive with the eyes
visions;
[as though transparent dreams shown them as if
a
movie while they remain awake and eyes wide
open]
and
the elders / presbyters of you will dreams within
dreams.
(AWPR)
18 And on my servants and on my handmaidens I will
pour out in those days of my Spirit; and they shall prophesy:(KJV)
18)And
upon the male slaves / servants of Me,
and
upon the female slaves / servants of Me,
in
those days,
I
will pour / spill out from the Spirit of Me,
and they will foretell the future / and they[too]will prophesy.
(AWPR)
19 And I will shew wonders in heaven above, and
signs in the earth beneath; blood, and fire, and vapour of smoke:(KJV)
19) And
I will give of My own good will and accord
amazing
miracles in the Heaven above
that
will be watched and surely remembered;
and
signs
[those miracles
serving GOD's specific Spiritual purpose]
upon
the Earth below:
blood
and fire and dense clouds [pillars / columns] of smoke.
(AWPR)
20 The sun shall be turned into darkness, and the
moon into blood, before the great and notable day of the Lord come:(KJV)
20)The
sun will be turned [for the worse] into
darkness,
and
the moon into blood
before
comes the Great and Shining Day of YHVeH /
before
comes the Great and Shining Day of (the) LORD.
(AWPR)
21 And it shall come to pass, that whosoever shall
call on the name of the Lord shall be saved.(KJV)
21) And
it will be that all who call upon the name of YHVeH /
And
it will be that all who call upon the name of (the) LORD
shall
be saved. (AWPR)
22 Ye men of Israel, hear these words; Jesus of
Nazareth, a man approved of God among you by miracles and wonders and signs,
which God did by him in the midst of you, as ye yourselves also know:(KJV)
22)Men, Israelites, listen – hear intently these
intelligent words;
Yeshua – Jesus, the Nazarene,
a
man from GOD
having
been shown as approved and
confirmed into you
by
capable achieving powers – by miraculous mighty deeds,
and
amazing miracles that were watched and remembered,
and
signs[those miracles that serve a Divine purpose]
which
GOD did cause – make – produce – bring about
through
Him in the middle of – among you
as
accordingly you yourselves also know – are (well) aware –
understand
intuitively.(AWPR)
23 Him, being delivered by the determinate counsel
and foreknowledge of God, ye have taken, and by wicked hands have crucified and
slain:(KJV)
23)This One, by the beforehand resolved – by the
beforehand reflection and decree of the will
and foreknowledge of GOD,
(was) given out and delivered up,
taken – seized – laid hold upon
through lawless hands – hands without Law;
having crucified, you executed – slayed – murdered
(AWPR)
24 Whom God hath raised up, having loosed the pains
of death: because it was not possible that he should be holden of it.(KJV)
24) whom GOD
raised up and caused to stand again
[whom
GOD resurrected from the dead and made fully alive
and standing again]
having
unfastened and loosed
(as
though they were cords and snares)
the
pains – sorrows of death;
because
that it was certainly NOT possible
[for
death and its cords]
To
grasp - take hold of and hold Him fast,
NOR
to rule over Him by it.
(AWPR)
25 For David speaketh concerning him, I foresaw the
Lord always before my face, for he is on my right hand, that I should not be
moved:(KJV)
25)Because
David lays down definite words
into
– concerning – as toHim,
‘I fixed my eyes upon – I foresaw
YHVeH – the LORD
before the face of me through all,
because out from / of (the) Right (hand /
side)
of Me, He is,
in order that I may not be moved to and fro
nor shaken.’ (AWPR)
26 Therefore did my heart rejoice, and my tongue was
glad; moreover also my flesh shall rest in hope:(KJV)
26) Through this was the heart and mind of
me joyful
and of good cheer,
and the tongue of me exulted as though
skipping
and leaping much for joy and delight.
Then
still yet,
the
flesh of me will also pitch tent
and
dwell down therein upon hope;
(AWPR)
27 Because thou wilt not leave my soul in hell,
neither wilt thou suffer thine Holy One to see corruption.(KJV)
27)Because
you will certainly not
forsake
– desert – leave behind the soul of me
into
Hades / into Hell,
and
also certainly not
will
you forsake – desert – leave behind
the
Holy – Righteous One of You
to
see destructive defilement with corruption throughout.
(AWPR)
28 Thou hast made known to me the ways of life; thou
shalt make me full of joy with thy countenance.(KJV)
28)You
declared - made known – revealed to me
paths
– highways of (eternal) life.
You
will make me completely full with joyful
gladness
of mind in the midst of the face of You.
(AWPR)
29 Men and brethren, let me freely speak unto you of
the patriarch David, that he is both dead and buried, and his sepulchre is with
us unto this day.(KJV)
29) Men,
brothers,
it
is to be from this – it is permitted (then)
to
speak – to saywith all freedom to declare
up
to and alongside with you
regarding
– about the Patriarch David,
and
that he died
and
was given funeral rites – was interred – buried;
and
the memorial Sepulcher – Memorial Tomb
of
him is in amongst us continually until this day.
(AWPR)
30 Therefore being a prophet, and knowing that God
had sworn with an oath to him, that of the fruit of his loins, according to the
flesh, he would raise up Christ to sit on his throne;(KJV)
30) For this
reason – certainly
living as – existing as a prophet,
seeing
and knowing that with an oath
declared
and sworn to him,
GOD,
out of (the) fruit – produce of the loin
of
him [David]down in (the) flesh
[did GOD promise]to raise and make stand up
the
Christ – the Messhiach
to
sit down upon the throne of him.
(AWPR)
31 He seeing this before spake of the resurrection
of Christ, that his soul was not left in hell, neither his flesh did see
corruption.(KJV)
31)Fixing
his eyes upon – foreseeing,
he
spoke at random around about – concerning
the
Resurrection of the Christ – the Messhiach,
that
the soul of Him was certainly NOT
forsaken
– deserted – left behind into Hades – into Hell,
nor
/ not even the flesh of Him
saw
or knew destructive defilement with corruption throughout.
(AWPR)
32 This Jesus hath God raised up, whereof we all are
witnesses.(KJV)
32) This Yeshua
– This Jesus
GOD
raised up and caused to stand again,
whereof
we all
[Not
just Peter with the 11, but the entire 120
Who received (upon the shoulder as at Shavuot
at Sinai
With Moses in 1551 B.C.) the tongues of fire
that translated]
are
witnesses.
(AWPR)
33 Therefore being by the right hand of God exalted,
and having received of the Father the promise of the Holy Ghost, he hath shed
forth this, which ye now see and hear.(KJV)
33)Now
certainly being elevated – exalted of GOD,
a
gift of promise graciously given of the Holy Spirit
accepting
– receiving – taking and laying hold of,
near
to the Father,
He
poured out this which you now – at this present time
see
– observe and attentively hear.
(AWPR)
34 For David is not ascended into the heavens: but
he saith himself, The Lord said unto my Lord, Sit thou on my right hand,(KJV)
34)Because
David certainly (has) not ascended into the heavens:
laying
down definite words then, he says,
‘said,
The LORD to the LORD of me,
Sit down out of the Right (hand-side) of Me,
(AWPR)
35 Until I make thy foes thy footstool.(KJV)
35) Until I
set in a (proper) place
the
enemies (to be) the under-footing (to be walked upon)
[the
foot-stool]
to
the feet of you.(AWPR)
36 Therefore let all the house of Israel know
assuredly, that God hath made the same Jesus, whom ye have crucified, both Lord
and Christ.(KJV)
36)Safely,
thereupon, let all the House of Israel
intently
and fully know that GOD caused Him to be
LORD
– YHVeH
and Christ – Messhiach:
this
Yeshua – Jesus
whom
you nailed to the Cross – whom you crucified.’
(AWPR)
37 Now when they heard this, they were pricked in
their heart, and said unto Peter and to the rest of the apostles, Men and
brethren, what shall we do?(KJV)
37)Then
having attentively heard,
they
were pierced through (as though stabbed)
in
the heart,
and
said up to and alongside with Peter and the remaining
(ones
of the) apostles,
‘What
shall we do men, brothers?’
(AWPR)
38 Then Peter said unto them, Repent, and be
baptized every one of you in the name of Jesus Christ for the remission of
sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the Holy Ghost.(KJV)
38)Peter then
answered – affirmed
up
to and alongside with them,
‘Repent
– change your mind and how you think,
and be baptized, each and every one of you
upon the Name of Yeshua HaMesshiach – Jesus Christ
into forgiveness – remission – putting away
of sins [those guilt offenses to GOD],
and you will actively take and receive
the (free) gift of the Holy Spirit:
(AWPR)
39 For the promise is unto you, and to your
children, and to all that are afar off, even as many as the Lord our God shall
call.(KJV)
39)Because
He is the Promise graciously given to you
and to the children of you,
even to all those a (very) long way off,
as many as may call the LORD – YHVeH
the GOD of us up alongside with (them).
(AWPR)
40 And with many other words did he testify and
exhort, saying, Save yourselves from this untoward generation.(KJV)
40) And with
many other definite words
he
earnestly and repeatedly bore witness,
and
aided – comforted – encouraged;
laying
down definite words, saying,
‘Be
saved – delivered from this
crooked – bent – warped – perverse generation!’
(AWPR)
41 Then they that gladly received his word were
baptized: and the same day there were added unto them about three thousand
souls.(KJV)
41) Those indeed truly thereupon delighting joyfully,
heartily
embracing and receiving the intelligent words of him
were
baptized;
and
there were put up to and alongside to them /
there
were added there
that day, as if 3,000 souls.
(AWPR)
42 And they continued stedfastly in the apostles'
doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers.(KJV)
42)Then
they were enduring up alongside and with
in
the Teaching – in the Instructionof
the Apostles,
and
in the Communion of Fellowship,
and
in the breaking of bread,
and
in the Prayers [to GOD].
(AWPR)
43 And fear came upon every soul: and many wonders
and signs were done by the apostles.(KJV)
43)Then
came into being terrifying fear (and reverence)
to
every soul, and
many miraculous wonders that were watched and remembered,
and
signs[those miracles that serve a Divine purpose]
through
the Apostles came into being – occurred.
(AWPR)
44 And all that believed were together, and had all
things common;(KJV)
44)Then all
the believing – trusting ones were upon themselves / were
together,
and
had – held –possessed all things common,
(AWPR)
45 And sold their possessions and goods, and parted
them to all men, as every man had need.(KJV)
45) And the
goods of that which is possessed
[‘And
their common property’]
and
the personal property – personal possessions / goods
they
traversed and trafficked upon – they sold
[in
the market places, and in the ways, near and far
as sellers of goods and wares]
and
separated up – divided out – distributed them to all,
according
as anyone had – held – possessed
debt
– need – necessity.
(AWPR)
46 And they, continuing daily with one accord in the
temple, and breaking bread from house to house, did eat their meat with
gladness and singleness of heart,(KJV)
46)Then
daily – from day to day
were
enduring up alongside and with
one
and the same mind – consent – accord
in
the Temple.
And
from house to house breaking bread,
they
too part and shared food in
exuberant
joy with exultation and dancing,
and
simplicity – pure intentions of heart;
(AWPR)
47 Praising God, and having favour with all the
people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved.(KJV)
47)Singing
praises to GOD,and having – holding –
possessing
It is also worthy to note that Acts Chapter 3 specifies that it picks up later that same day of Pentecost, about 6 hours later. Acts 3:1 Upon the self-same day then, Peter and John, ascending up into the Temple, upon the hour of prayer, the 9th. (AWPR)
It is my view that the true Pentecost upper Room of
the Southeast Temple Court subjoining both the southern wall's Royal portico,
and the Eastern wall's Portico of Solomon.
The view to the left of that of the what I contend was the Temple's upper room, and the one in the Book of Acts, oversaw a very great height and drop at the Southeast Corner of the Temple Mount {cf. Josephus, Antiquities of the Jews, 15.11.5} (before being filled in by the Romans attacking Jerusalem in A.D. 70) and is re-created below:
Again, it is my personal belief that those of
the Upper Room were situated at the location of the southeast Corner of the Temple Mount, -- which is also attached to Solomon's porch running up the East wall where Yeshua - Jesus taught from and to which they ever after for the next two decades or better congregated in -- and then spilled out into the Court of the Gentiles.
In regard to Acts 2:34-35 and the AWPR
translation from the Greek, I am also adding an addendum of Psalm 110 in KJV
and AWPR (as taken from the Hebrew in which the quoted passage of Psalm 110's
verse 1 was originally written):
Psalm 110
1 - The LORD said
unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy
footstool. (KJV)
1) An oracle
statement of YHVeH toMy Master / My
Lord.
Sit, remain and dwell at My Right Hand /
Sit,
remain and dwell at My Right Side
until I give over, setting and appointing
Your enemies who hate (You) with hostility
as a footstool for the dominion of your
feet.(AWPR)
2 - The LORD shall
send the rod of thy strength out of Zion: rule thou in the midst of thine
enemies. (KJV)
2)Like an overspreading bedsheet,
the Staff of your strength shall send
forth YHVeH out of Zion:
in the inner midst and among those hating
You as your enemies,
tread with domnion / over-rule / and
scrape (them) out.(AWPR)
3 - Thy people shall
be willing in the day of thy power, in the beauties of holiness from the womb
of the morning: thou hast the dew of thy youth. (KJV)
3)Your kinsmen from the fathers
shall do noble deeds and be willing
in the Day of your firm enduring power
and might;
(they shall be as) the adorning glorious
array of you holiness,
as (those coming forth) from the womb
of the first light of the day in a
pre-dawn sky lighting across the heavens,
and (shall be) as the falling / dripping
dew of your childhood / youth.
(AWPR)
4 - The LORD hath
sworn, and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of
Melchizedek. (KJV)
4)YHVeH has sworn a solemn seven-fold oath,
and NOT will (He) breathe deep with
sorrow / regret / or repentence
(He will NOT change His mind
and reverse course on what He has sworn
and is resolved to do)
NOR will (He) have need to be comforted.
You are a Kohen, a Priest to the ages, to
forever,
above, ascended beyond in height,
according to the manner / cause /
reasoning of
bearing (the title of) and being
Malchizedek
King of Righteousness /
(He who is) the fullness of the burning
branding
of the consuming fire of Righteousness.(AWPR)
5 - The Lord at thy
right hand shall strike through kings in the day of his wrath.
(KJV)
5) The Master / Lord
at Your Right Hand / at Your Right Side
severely wounds with a lethal and decisive
blow
striking / shattering kings
in the Day of His Wrath /
in the Day of His Great Displeasure
(as if a sudden point of fury at
being offended)[at mankind's sins].
(AWPR)
6 - He shall judge
among the heathen, he shall fill the places with the dead bodies; he shall
wound the heads over many countries. (KJV)
6)He shall judge the nations,
raising the Hand
vexing them with great emotional
affliction and tribulation
which He will fill or make full with
corpses.
He will severely wound with a lethal and
decisive blow,
striking venom / gall
over a great many lands of the Earth from
high above the Earth.
(AWPR)
7 - He shall drink of
the brook in the way: therefore shall he lift up the head.
(KJV)
7)From the wadi brook torrent in the Way
(of the Wide Course in the Wilderness)
He shall drink down (as though He were
consuming wine at a feast);
and setting (all things) aright / upright
from above