Welcome! Jesus Christ is my LORD and Savior! Romans 10:9-10,13; John 3:16

[For EU visitors, I do not personally use cookies, but Google or any clickable link (if you choose to click on it) might. This is in compliance with mandatory EU notification]

At this site, I discuss politics with a Right-Wing Conservative view that is pro-environmental, is in the defense of the freedom that is our birthright, and will go into detail discussing Conservative Fundamental Protestant Christian Theology that is pro-Zionist.

At times I will post some poems or other literary things I write, and may often post various entertainment or educational videos that I find of interest, and hope you will, too.

Thank you for coming, and feel free to also visit Frontsight or one of the recommended site links. You may also submit comments through the moderation process, or simply vote in a check off box below each article.
In the Year of our LORD Jesus Christ / A.D. 2015

Statement of Principle: Barack Obama is NOT a United States Natural Born Citizen, and illegally holds office.

"No Person except a Natural Born Citizen…shall be eligible to the Office of President...."
US Constitution: Article 2, section 1, Clause 5

The Original Constitutional Intent of a Natural Born Citizen at the time and era it was written is defined in this: that a child is born to a US CITIZEN Father at the Time of Birth, on US Soil or exclusive US Sovereignty, (this includes those born upon a US Flagship on direct water passage in International Waters IF it is so done between soil of the United States to soil of the United States); and that the child has NO OTHER CITIZENSHIP(S) OR ALLEGIANCE(S) FROM BIRTH TO AGE 21.

The Founders utilized John Locke for this definition:“This holds in all the laws a man is under, whether natural or civil. Is a man under the law of nature? What made him free of that law? what gave him a free disposing of his property, according to his own will, within the compass of that law? I answer, a state of maturity wherein he might be supposed capable to know that law, that so he might keep his actions within the bounds of it. When he has acquired that state, he is presumed to know how far that law is to be his guide, and how far he may make use of his freedom, and so comes to have it; till then, some body else must guide him, who is presumed to know how far the law allows a liberty. If such a state of reason, such an age of discretion made him free, the same shall make his son free too. Is a man under the law of England? What made him free of that law? that is, to have the liberty to dispose of his actions and possessions according to his own will, within the permission of that law? A capacity of knowing that law; which is supposed by that law, at the age of one and twenty years, and in some cases sooner. If this made the father free, it shall make the son free too. Till then we see the law allows the son to have no will, but he is to be guided by the will of his father or guardian, who is to understand for him. And if the father die, and fail to substitute a deputy in his trust; if he hath not provided a tutor, to govern his son, during his minority, during his want of understanding, the law takes care to do it; some other must govern him, and be a will to him, till he hath attained to a state of freedom, and his understanding be fit to take the government of his will. But after that, the father and son are equally free as much as tutor and pupil after nonage; equally subjects of the same law together, without any dominion left in the father over the life, liberty, or estate of his son, whether they be only in the state and under the law of nature, or under the positive laws of an established government.”
John Locke, Second Treatise on Government, Chapter 6: ‘Of Paternal Power’ §. 59

"...the term ‘natural born citizen’ is used and excludes all persons owing allegiance by birth to foreign states.”
The New Englander and Yale Law Review, Volume 3 (1845), p. 414

In May of 2009, Barack Obama and the Government of the United States of America officially recognized Kogelo, Kenya, as the birth place of the putative President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama II. It was attended by U.S. Ambassador Michael Ranneberger. The official Kenyan Government memo, Compiled by: Agwanda, J.O., ASDD and Comissioned by: Machage, T. N . , SDD
states very clearly and absolutely unmistakably that: “This was to honour the birthplace of President Barack Obama and re-dedicate the tomb of Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., the president's late father.”

Under Constitutional Intent of the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Article 2.1.5, the successful US Government Attorney of later Wong Kim Ark fame shows us that the Paternal Link (that through the Father's Status) is essential in determining who is or is NOT a United States Natural Born Citizen:
Birth, therefore, does not ipso facto confer citizenship, and is essential in order that a person be a native or natural born citizen of the United States, that his father be at the time of the birth of such person a citizen thereof, or in the case he be illegitimate, that his mother be a citizen thereof at the time of such birth. – GEORGE D. COLLINS, SAN FRANCISCO, CAL.”

“…at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was ...a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.”
http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/does_barack_obama_have_kenyan_citizenship.html {link since removed}

Rep. A. Smyth (VA), House of Representatives, December 1820:
When we apply the term “citizens” to the inhabitants of States, it means those who are members of the political community. The civil law determined the condition of the son by that of the father. A man whose father was not a citizen was allowed to be a perpetual inhabitant, but not a citizen, unless citizenship was conferred on him."

Since Barack Obama depends upon "operation of law" to claim citizenship status, he is NOT a United States NATURAL born citizen, and fails to meet Constitutionality.

Ex Parte Bain, 121 U.S. 1 (1887) @ 12
"It is never to be forgotten that in the construction of the language of the Constitution here relied on, as indeed in all other instances where construction becomes necessary, we are to place ourselves as nearly as possible in the condition of the men who framed that instrument."

Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U. S. 1 (1824) @ 188-189 http://supreme.justia.com/us/22/1/case.html states:
" ...the enlightened patriots who framed our Constitution, and the people who adopted it, must be understood to have employed words in their natural sense, and to have intended what they have said. If, from the imperfection of human language, there should be serious doubts respecting the extent of any given power, it is a well settled rule that the objects for which it was given, especially when those objects are expressed in the instrument itself, should have great influence in the construction."

Thomas Jefferson, in his letter to William Johnson, dated June 12, 1823 from Monticello, wrote:
"On every question of construction [of the Constitution] let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or intended against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed."

Holmes v. Jennison, 39 U.S. (14 Peters) 540 (1840)@ 570-571 http://supreme.justia.com/us/39/540/case.html
“In expounding the Constitution of the United States, every word must have its due force and appropriate meaning, for it is evident from the whole instrument that no word was unnecessarily used or needlessly added. The many discussions which have taken place upon the construction of the Constitution have proved the correctness of this proposition and shown the high talent, the caution, and the foresight of the illustrious men who framed it. Every word appears to have been weighed with the utmost deliberation, and its force and effect to have been fully understood. No word in the instrument, therefore, can be rejected as superfluous or unmeaning, and this principle of construction applies …”

The various terms of Citizen in the US Constitution are described in this pdf. http://www.scribd.com/doc/11737124/Citizenship-Terms-Used-in-the-US-Constitution-The-5-Terms-Defined-Some-Legal-Reference-to-Same

By having a Foreign National Father, and a foreign citizenship at birth and retained to his 23rd birthday, and / or a renunciation of US Citizenship declared by his mother to the US Consulate and signed under oath on August 13 of 1968 to declare her son absolved of US Citizenship for an Indonesian one, http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/05/orly-taitz-still-standing-new-lawsuits.html

Barack Hussein Obama II is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNQUALIFIED for the Office of US President.


Elk v. Wilkins, 112 US 94 (1884) @ 101-102 states that:
"The main object of the opening sentence of the fourteenth amendment was …to put it beyond doubt that all persons, white or black, and whether formerly slaves or not, born or naturalized in the United States, and OWING NO ALLEGIANCE TO ANY ALIEN POWER, should be citizens of the United States and of the state in which they reside. Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall. 36, 73; Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303, 306."

Obama owed allegiance to both the United Kingdom (Great Britain) and Kenya at birth, regardless if he was born in the US or not. Only by complete dishonesty can anyone label the man a qualified occupant of the Presidency. Ipso facto and de jure, he is not legally President of the United States, and his entire occupancy is legally voidable. His short form is so easily reproductive forgery, it might as well say Mickey Hussein Mouse as it does here: http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x13/Mactographer/birth_certificate_2-1.jpg

On January 19, 2011
and on January 25, 2011

it was almost conclusive in the journalistic sense, that the only thing on file in Hawaii as regards Obama is a data entry of : "Obama II, Barack Hussein, Male...." instead of any United States Birth Certificate or Certification of Live Birth.

"The burden of establishing a delegation of power
to the United States,
or the prohibition of power to the States,
is upon those making the claim."
Bute v. Illinois, 333 U.S. 640 @653 (1948)

That means it is upon Obama and/or his lawyers to produce Court admissible documents establishing his birth identity with location and witnesses to the birth (cf. Nguyen v. INS 533 US 53 (2001) @ 54,62), - -

Nguyen v. INS 533 US 53 (2001) @ 54,62 http://supreme.justia.com/us/533/53/
@ 54 : “The mother's relation is verifiable from the birth itself and is documented by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses to the birth.”
@62:” In the case of the mother, the relation is verifiable from the birth itself. The mother's status is documented in most instances by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses who attest to her having given birth.”

- - as well as having a US Citizen father age 21 or above at the time of birth.

John Jay’s letter to George Washington, July 25, 1787 states:
“Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government; and to declare expressly that the commander in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen.

It is clear that a “natural born citizen” in John Jay’s intent is someone WITHOUT dual or multiple nationalities, but has only one since birth: that of the US by both parents and geography, and NO OTHER.

In 1874, the US Supreme Court ruled that as it regards Common Law, that if we follow that model, not only did a US Citizen Father have to be present to make one a US Natural Born Citizen, but a US Citizen Mother also. And that formula of Common Law is also operative vice versa in the phrase: “all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens “, that without a US Citizen Father, you could NOT be defined as a United States Natural Born Citizen, PERIOD!!!

At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”
Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874) @167
(see also how Justia.com tried to bury this key reference case @ http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/12/justiagate_natural_born_supreme_court_citations_disappear.html )

On June 6, 1951, President Truman signed the 1951 British Treaty between the United States of America and the United Kingdom / Great Britain. This Treaty, ratified by the United States Senate, took effect on September 7, 1952. This Treaty authorizes the British Consulate to register the birth of British Subjects born in the United States of America, establishing a British jurisdiction over US Born Citizens of a British Citizen parent or parents. The British consulate of the jurisdiction of the United States where they were found, including the territory and later state of Hawaii, and were thus authorized to give British passports to those like Barack Hussein Obama II as a British subject and United Kingdom and Colonies Citizen at the petition of a British Citizen parent, like Barack Hussein Obama I's request (Obama's father).
http://travel.state.gov/law/legal/treaty/treaty_1507.html (See also 8 USC 1101 (a) (15) (F) (i) http://www.gpoaccess.gov/uscode/ )

While Obama declares he was born in Hawaii http://www.scribd.com/doc/56732637/Obama-Declares-He-Was-Born-in-Hawaii
neither Obama, nor his lawyers, nor the US Attorneys have ever produced one shred of solid identifying evidence of the man's identity into Court Evidence in a Court of Law. They refuse to enter his Birth Certificate or Certification of Live Birth, whether long or short, because both are forgeries. Even though under 333 US 640, Bute v. Illinois (1948) @ 653 and 533 US 53, Nguyen v. INS (2001) @ 54,62 they are so required to produce into Court's Evidence, submitting them as authentic under penalty of perjury to the Courts. IT NEVER HAPPENED because they are knowingly fraudulent documents.

Then there is Obama’s 1995 confession of legal identity facts as of then:
"You know, as soon as the Old Man died,
the lawyers contacted all those who might have a claim to the inheritance.
Unlike my mum,
has all the documents needed to prove
who Mark's father was."
Dreams from My Father, p. 345 Barack Obama
(confessing there is NO Birth Certificate of any kind for him in Hawaii as of 1995)

Obama can therefore be required by Law to produce an authentic US Hospital Birth Certificate into Court Evidence, something he has NEVER done, nor have in lawyers remotely done in the one reference they made to pro-Obama blogs in Hollister v. Soetoro Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-02254-JR.What is it that Robert Bauer of Perkins Coie offered the Court the one time he even referred to substantiation in Hollister v. Soetoro Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-02254-JR? Legal FRAUD upon the Court.

“Fraud on the Court is conduct:
1) on the part of an officer of the Court;
2) that is directed to the judicial machinery itself;
3) that is intentionally false, willfully blind to the truth, or is in reckless disregard for the truth;
4) that is a positive averment or a concealment when one is under duty to disclose;
5) that deceives the Court.”
Workman v. Bell, 245 F.3d 849 (6th Circuit 2001) @ 852

{{{Quote from Hollister v. Soetoro, Footnote 1: }}}1 President Obama has publicly produced a certified copy of a birth certificate showing that he was born on August 4, 1961, in Honolulu Hawaii. See, e.g., Factcheck.org, “Born in the U.S.A.: The truth about Obama’s birth certificate,” available at http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html (concluding that the birth certificate is genuine, and noting a contemporaneous birth announcement published in a Honolulu newspaper). Hawaii officials have publicly verified that they have President Obama’s “original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.” See “Certified,” Honolulu Star Bulletin, Oct. 31, 2008. This Court can take judicial notice of these public news reports. See The Washington Post v. Robinson,935 F.2d 282, 291 (D.C. Cir. 1991); Agee v. Muskie, 629 F.2d 80, 81 n.1, 90 (D.C. Cir. 1980). {{{Unquote}}}

Obama CANNOT and will NOT produce a valid Birth Certificate into evidence in a Court of Law because both released long and short copies ARE FORGERIES.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/04/white-house-releases-long-form-birth.html

Snopes.com, another pro-Obama partisan propaganda site, self-patting themselves on how factual they are when it comes to Obama, couldn’t even cite the correct alleged obstetrician it claimed delivered Obama. When the Obama forged Certification of Live Birth Long Form came out, their facts that “Rodney T. West delivered Obama in Hawaii” were cast aside as fables they promulgated to the gullible masses for over 2 years. http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=295265

The Office of the White House Press Secretary linked journalists and other interested parties to what they called an authentic Obama Short Form Certification of Live Birth, as vetted by Snopes.com. Unfortunately, the link went to Ron Polland’s made from Template Scratch openly attributed forgery, of which Polland said he was the creator. In other words, the White House sourced themselves in a genuine copy of a known public forgery which url even contained Dr. Polland’s previous internet pseudonym in the url / jpg address itself. http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/BO_Birth_Certificate.jpg

Obama also uses an identity theft Social Security Number of a now deceased person 042-68-4425 http://www.scribd.com/doc/47560424/Affidavit-Regarding-Obamas-Social-Security-Numbers-Susan-Daniels for someone born in 1890 AND ISSUED IN CONNECTICUT in 1977-1979 as if a Tax ID number for most all his adult life. It is time for Congress to empower a special prosecutor and move to Criminal Filings against him, beginning with a subpoena duces tecum of his alleged identity documents under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedures 17(c) and "call his bluff".

In matter of fact, my quoting the Kenyan Media by the same standards as Bauer’s use of “The Washington Post v. Robinson,935 F.2d 282, 291 (D.C. Cir. 1991); Agee v. Muskie, 629 F.2d 80, 81 n.1, 90 (D.C. Cir. 1980)” is de facto and de jure not only just as relevant, but MORE relevant, as it sources a nation of birth, and a national citizenship at birth as jus soli in Kenya by Government confirmation, where the Hawaii newspaper announcements neither address nationality nor location at birth, only that a birth somewhere in the world occurred for people alleged to live at so-an-so an address.

The Nairobi Kenya Eastern Standard is the source of the Birther Movement, substantiated by other African Media and Kenya’s own Government Officials in Public Statement of fact in Transcript. Of primary concern is the Nairobi Kenya Eastern Standard dated as Sunday, June 27, 2004. Its headline reads:
“Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate”

The first line reads:“Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.”

De facto, the Nairobi Kenya Eastern Standard states clearly in the headline that Senator Barack Obama is Kenyan born...hence, born in Kenya. http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm

There are no other living witnesses besides Barack's step-grandmother, who says she saw him birthed, and she says THAT was in Kenya! http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=107524 and that claim was vetted twice by Kenya's Parliament, one of which in March of 2010!!!“

Thursday, 25th March, 2010
The House met at 2.30 p.m. p. 31 ...2nd paragraph
[Mr. Orengo, Minister of Lands of the nation of Kenya, speaking]: "...how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American,become the President of America?It is because they did away with exclusion." http://www.scribd.com/doc/29758466/RDRAFT25

In others words, NON-Natural born Citizens of the US can now be President of the USA, starting with Barack Hussein Obama!!! See also: http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/04/obama-fec-audited-in-2011-little-bit.html

In matter of fact, various Secretaries of States will declare to the effect that the States have no right to verify if a candidate running for President is even a US Citizen, let alone qualified.

{{{Quote}}} “…neither the Connecticut General Statutes nor the Constitution of the State of Connecticut authorizes me to investigate a Presidential candidate’s eligibility to run for the office of President of the United States.” Secretary of State, Susan Bysicwicz (Connecticut) November 26, 2008. http://moniquemonicat.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/obama-sec-of-state-connecticuit-fax-name-removed.pdfSee also: http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2010/01/was-obama-ever-vetted-as-qualified.html

It is a legal fact that Natural Born Citizenship is required to be a US President, which Obama does NOT have... NOT having the proper US Citizenship Credentials to produce into evidence in a COURT of Law, and especially by NOT BEING a UNITED STATES NATURAL BORN CITIZEN by the same principles of primogeniture and entail in regard to a sole US Citizenship (i.e., because he has NO US Citizen Father to Naturally take the place in Society of). Hence, he is a Usurper of the US Presidency, and an active criminal regularly committing felonies every time he acts or speaks in the fraudulently obtained office of the US Presidency.

Obama's own Mother declared Obama Jr. lost his US Citizenship as of August 13, 1968

Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro-Passport Application File-Strunk v Dept of State-FOIA Release-FINAL-7-29-10

Obama's Mother formally reported on her son so as to declare Obama Jr. lost his US Citizenship as of August 13, 1968 and denounced him officially before a Department of State Representative and signed such official documentation, intending that he had officially become a permanent Indonesian Citizen, absolved of any claim to a US nationality.

Obama's mother signed under oath on the back page of Form FS-299 of 7-64, following the instructions:

"I have not (and no other person included or to be included in the passport or documentation has), since acquiring United States citizenship, been naturalized as a citizen of a foreign state, taken an oath or made an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state…

{If any of the above-mentioned acts or conditions have been performed by or apply to the applicant, or to any other person included in the passport or documentation, the portion of which applies should be struck out , and a supplementary explanatory statement under oath (or affirmation) by the person to whom the portion is applicable should be attached and made a part of this application.}

Ann Dunham wrote Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah) and struck his name out to indicate that he was legally to no longer be a United States Citizen, and the document stood to apply all relevant passages that could apply to a 7 year old who lost US Citizenship by naturalization to Indonesia with a renunciation of his allegiance and renunciation of his citizenship by both he and his mother and his step-father for him.

Again, his own mother on August 13, 1968, before a Department of State consulate, denounced her son Barack Hussein Obama as having foreign allegiances and foreign naturalization to Indonesia, and signed to this effect in form FS-277, writing and striking his name out.

We must remember that:

Chin Bak Kan v. United States 186 U.S. 193 (1902) @ 200

We do not need a Presidential candidate or President so badly, that we have to go outside the pool of two citizen parents at their birth on US Soil for a President, regardless of the candidate's ethnicity. The DNC yielded to a known unqualified candidate as a means of desperation, as if the pressure of exigency to get their Party the Presidency in 2008, and discarded the sacred trust of the People of the United States in upholding the US Constitution, by offering the most powerful office in the world to a United Kingdom and Colonies foreign national turned resident of the United States who may or may not even have as much as a secondary US Citizenship under the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952's statutory law, if he indeed was born in Kenya as the media and Government of Kenya claims.

Under Original Intent and interpretation of the 14th Amendment, Obama fails to qualify as a 14th Amendment Citizen without a US Citizen Father and by having foreign dual or multi-national citizenship at birth:

The Congressional Globe, 1st session, May 30, 1866

The debate on the first section of the 14th Amendment


Senator Jacob Howard (R-Michigan) authored a "subject to the jurisdiction" clause into the 14th Amendment. Upon his introduction, the ff. are his remarks.

Part 4 (column 2), page 2890

Mr. Howard: The first amendment is to section one, declaring "that all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside...This is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.

Senator Trumbull of Illinois, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee concurred:

Part 4 (columns 1-2), page 2893

Mr. Trumbull: The provision is, "that all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens." That means "subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof"... What do we mean by "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States"? Not owing alliance to anybody else. That is what it means.

...It cannot be said of any...who owes allegiance, partial allegiance if you please, to some other Government that he is "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States."

...It is only those persons who completely within our jurisdiction, who are subject to our laws, that we think of making citizens; and there can be no objection to the proposition that such persons should be citizens."

Part 4 (columns 2-3), page 2895

Mr. Howard: I concur entirely with the honorable Senator from Illinois, in holding that the word "jurisdiction" as here employed, ought to be construed so as to imply a full and complete jurisdiction on the part of the United States...that is to say, the same jurisdiction in extent and quality as applies to every citizen of the United States now.

Then we have the dilemma of Law Legislated under an illegal Obama Presidency.

The U.S. Supreme Court, in the case of Fletcher v. Peck, 10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 87 (1810) @ 87
The principle asserted is that one legislature is competent to repeal any act which a former legislature was competent to pass, and that one legislature cannot abridge the powers of a succeeding legislature. The correctness of this principle so far as it respects general legislation cannot be controverted. But if an act be done under a law, a succeeding legislature cannot undo it. The past cannot be recalled by the most absolute power.”

By NOT having a legal US President in Office, not one single piece of Legislature signed by Obama is "under law" unless one can show that it was voted on by a 2/3 majority in both the House of Representatives and the US Senate and would have passed anyway, even if Obama were not in Office to exert the influence he had in the office of the US Presidency he usurped / illegally held and illegally maintained by fraud or its variants. Therefore, the objection that might be cited in Fletcher v. Peck, 10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 87 (1810) @87 that a succeeding Congress cannot void out the legislation of a preceding Congress -- when that legislation in the preceding Congress was an illegal action via a signing or benign neglect affirmation by an illegal Executive -- is therefore easily overcome.

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803) @ 180 states that
“a law repugnant to the constitution IS VOID. . . .” and
“in declaring what shall be the SUPREME law of the land, the CONSTITUTION itself is first mentioned; and not the laws of the United States generally, but those only which shall be made in PURSUANCE of the constitution,have that rank.”

I advocate that we follow the US Constitution and the advice of the US Supreme Court for such a crisis as this, and VOID OUT Obama's entire Presidency!!! Amen!!!

To all true U.S. Patriots, Obama is and remains unforgiven,

and we remain justified in both saying and doing this, because it is the appropriate response to an "alien national" who has usurped the Presidency, who is absolutely unable to produce -- and his own lawyers refuse to put forth under penalty of committing felonies to attest to its unfraudulent veracity -- evidence of a United States Natural Born Citizenship to Barack Hussein Obama II in ANY U.S. Court of Law. They won't even place his alleged Birth Certificate or Social Security Card before the Court as genuine under penalty of perjury. Under Bute v. Illinois or 333 U.S. 640 (1948) @ 653, WE THE PEOPLE have the right to demand Barack Obama PROVE the right to his claim of the U.S. Constitution authorizing him, a suspected illegal alien and known foreign national, to the powers and authority vested in that of a President of the United States...who saw fit to help re-write a foreign (Kenyan) Constitution to include Islamic Sharia compliances and to make himself once again one of its current citizens while occupying and claiming to be "First Citizen" in the Presidency of the United States.

Peace and Liberty. Semper Fidelis.

Saturday, November 28, 2015

November 2015 - Editorial With Videos And Links Regarding Turkey's Bush-Whack Offensive On Behalf Of Murderous ISIS Terrorism, Of Their Across the Border Shoot-Down Of Russian Fighter

It is now openly known by many that Obama openly refuses to read Intelligence Reports on Islamic Terrorist Groups BECAUSE THEY ARE MUSLIM or when it "hurts his feelings" to do so. Which for that thin skinned faggot is often, apparently.  The political reaction in the Media and the Government here in the US?  Phhht.    The United States Military and the Intelligence Agencies 
(disregarding the Muslim John "Fellow ISIS Muslim Jihadi Internal Traitor" Brennan, head at C.I.A.) 
of this nation, instead of demanding a Military Tribunal of Obama for TREASON, or at least that demand Congress conduct his Impeachment, they instead wring their hands and go "Awww!"

Obama refuses to look at Islamic Terrorist Intelligence Reports?

[[[[ Update November 29, 2015: Maybe Obama plays with himself in a bath-tub and yells "Allahu Quackbar!" 

Internet Photoshops Rubber Ducks Onto Pictures Of Jihadis

 Photo: 4Chan / Imgur

as the latest internet parody of ISIS mocks them, and should also mock Obama in his undying and never wavering support of Islamic Jihad Satanism (to steal, kill, and destroy and have no respect for human life)  mentality through ISIS.  ]]]]

Isn't it time to say that is MORE than just dereliction of an expectation of duty for someone in the office Obama is usurping?  Or does he get another race-card pass?   Obama is a quite probably not only fatally nefarious in his treatment of this nation, but also it can be said that he is quite probably a Delusional Maniac with worse than just the usual claims of sociopathic narcissism 
with the actual potential to think, and perhaps to one day even to try to do,  that he can order a nuclear strike by U.S. nukes on the United States itself and some of those who blindly follow him would so launch against such domestic targets because it is Obama, the one the Media and politicians demand we never question or challenge.  Is the failure to stand up to and against Obama because they of the Joint Chiefs of Staff  feel some kind of mass hypnosis they subjected themselves to, or could it be a kind of co-guilt and shame for themselves ordering giving sophisticated ordinance to ISIS and then being able to themselves enlarge and see the serial numbers of their own stuff publicly demonstrated for ISIS called in Media using a U.S. Tow Missile on a bush-whacked Russian Search and Rescue Chopper for all the world to see that they went along with or said nothing in resistance to?   
Just wondering. 

Thousands of tanker trucks are being used to run oil for ISIS (that ISIS murdered and stole from Syria) into Turkey, 
and in return ISIS terrorism is being supplied and funded at a different level of the same kind of Communist State Capitalism one would expect to see from China.   From July of 2014 to present day in 2015, Turkey has pretended to war on ISIS, and used the opportunity to drop 80% of its ordinance on the anti-ISIS Kurds  in both northwestern Iraq and in locations around northern Syria.   Most of the other 20% was against Assad's Nation of Syria Military Forces.  In effect, if Turkey ever dropped one bomb on ISIS /Al Qaeda, it was by accident and to be considered by both Turkey and ISIS as "friendly fire."   As far as I am concerned, TURKEY is ISIS and Russia should either INVADE Turkey's Capitol and overthrow its government  or nuke that government of Turkey in a single vaporization.

However, the more practical application of Turkey siding with ISIS and NATO backing it up, is for both Russia and Iran to STOP gas supplies to Turkey cold, and threaten to do the same to Europe while spiking prices up 30% overnight to Europe.  (See maps at links below).




In effect, Russia has the right to wait to the coldest days of winter, and shut off the gas supplies to Europe.

When Turkey is seen for what it is, there is no doubt that it is a direct logistics lifeline to ISIS 

and a military air force for hire for ISIS (whereas Obama wants the U.S. to pay ISIS infidel tax and militarily train ISIS (in places such as Amman Jordan as reported back in August 2013, for example)

and provide logistics and militarily support ISIS as the U.S.A.'a own expense).

[[[[Update: November 29, 2015   See also: 

End of Update]]]]

That attitude of Turkey, that it is obligated to protect ISIS terrorists who are cleansing the Middle East of Christians by genocide, the same way Turkey conducted genocide upon the Armenians 100 years ago and more, that same attitude of hate toward peace loving Christians fueled a firing across the border at a pretended incursion of a Russian SU-24 (Israel says an SU-29) Fighter that likely did NOT invade Turkish airspace for a few seconds, 
if that airspace violation ever happened.

Further, we learn that NATO by necessity pre-authorized any such provocation and killing of Russians killing terrorists in Syria.

The Syrians have come out and stated that Turkey's leader Erdogan is heavily involved in the buying of ISIS oil, 
-- at $800,000,000 in sales through Turkey and climbing in November 2015 
http://www.infowars.com/former-nato-commander-turkey-is-supporting-isis/  -- 

and it may be that Erdogan's over-involved-with ISIS son is on the cuff for many of the ISIS tankers being used to smuggle oil to Turkey, and that the downing of a Russian Fighter from a missile launched inside Turkey into Syrian Airspace was merely a mafia like revenge killing.

The flight path had been pre-planned and given to the American Military, who then leaked it to Turkey, and Turkey made that pre-flight plan a select target for ambush.  

As a consequence of the unprovoked shoot down, Russia rightly mobilized an anti-aircraft missile defense in Syria, including a Mediterranean Sea supporting Missile Cruiser Moskva and Turkey responded with a pledge to start up a war with Russia, and perhaps also prodded the murderous jihadi terrorists attack the Russians in retaliation as well.



In response to the shoot down, Russia continued with both electronic warfare and hundreds of strikes on ISIS and even those Turkish Front Groups for Al Qaeda / ISIS were not spared while on Syrian soil.



If Russia so chooses, it could effectually use its missile defense as an offense into as much as 25% or more of Turkish airspace with each S-400 system having the ability to engage 36 aircraft simultaneously at each launcher unit mobilized.

What is off most commentary is the fact that the Iranians have joined their own fighters alongside the Russians in the skies over Syria for more than a week now. 

The immediate disruption of natural gas into Turkey would only be one possible response if Turkey does another fighter shoot-down.  Several nuclear blasts by Iran have been stated to have happened, so Iran might already have the nuclear bomb, and might first want to test it out on Ankara for all we know, before moving on to a next target of Israel.  

In only December of 2013, the United States Special Forces and the Iranian Elite Military Forces fought alongside and with each other against what was describes as Elements of Al Qaeda / ISIS in Iraq.

It appears that if Al Qaeda goes where it is supposed to go as directed by the usurped government of the United States, we will have "allies" who will join the United States in aiding Al Qaeda in pre-designated nations they are being told and forced to go, where they will be armed and carry out a 21st Century new kind of proxy army warfare, and excused as NOT an invading army but relabeled and marketed as "Freedom Fighters", to do whatever atrocities they wish, as long as they maul and kill in their cage where the only bars are designated borders, and outside the borders are "safe zones" where they are not supposed to kill.  Hypothetically the argument and solution to these multi-government controlled or multi-government directed terrorist proxy armies of backward and murderous  barbarians appears to be that only way to stop it is to first directly kill the multi-national leadership directly involved in sending - arming - militarily supporting it, and then using the military to go in an kill the proxy armies off without restriction, does it not?

Biblical prophecy apparently seems to indicate, if I understand it correctly, that eventually there will be a re-emergence of Persia, or an Iran that gobbles up northern Iraq and part of Syria (perhaps even all of it, for all I know, because at some point in time, Damascus is prophesied to be entirely flattened). 

 Russia will have a probably permanent heavily armed presence in Syria (to set up for the eventual invasion of Israel probably still at least several years away as prophesied in Ezekiel 38-39), and eventually, at some point in time in the future (be it near or far) will sign a Peace Treaty that will also involve Iran and Western and Southern European Nations, the United States, and Israel.  

So I will watch in 50% expectation of an escalation that pulls Israel into this conflict and threatens to go nuclear, or perhaps it does go nuclear where fingers point as to who used a nuke on Damascus (be it Russia, Syria, Iran, Turkey, ISIS, Israel, or the nation state sponsor of terror under a foreign usurper / the USA) and perhaps is never to be ever known or proven as to which nation or party really did it.  

Tuesday, November 24, 2015

Obama And The November 5, 2009 Fort Hood Muslim Sociopath Murderer / Terrorist. Is There Really Any Psychological Difference?

Remember The Fort Hood Texas Muslim Murderer Major Nidal Hassan?  Obama is how different?

For years, this scumbag as a United States Army Psychiatrist was laying guilt trip after guilt trip on thousands of returning U.S. Army soldiers, often berating them for killing Muslims and trying to put the blame on them for their fellow U.S. soldiers dying in Iraq and Afghanistan as if it were the survivor’s faults.
An Improvised Explosive Device blew up the Humvee 75 yards ahead of you?  "It's your fault.  That's your friend died because he killed Muslims is all your fault, and you have no right to be angry at me for telling you you are dirty and evil and his death is all your fault, because Allah ... blah, blah, blah."  There is no affirmation of an intent to see a people free to have their own Bill of Rights and equality, or to be able to live free of being abducted and tortured and killed just for the hell of it by a totalitarian regime.  No, none of that.  It is an Obama line that comes from the delusional and mentally ill mind of Obama that is based in his child rape domination by Communist Central Committee Member Frank Marshall Davis along with abandonment, homosexual deviancies, hard and perhaps still current illegal substance drug use,  and a lifelong affirmative action type of behavioral enforcement of  his own embedded sociopathic narcissism and how it is all YOUR fault for being white or not being Muslim or daring to serve a tour of duty in the United States Military and in combat in a predominantly Muslim third world dipshit country that thinks using their hand up their ass to cleanse pull out their feces and then wiggling it in a bowl of water is then magically sanitary and to touch food you will soon eat or surfaces will soon eat off of again.  That is the world of Islam in most of the Middle East and North Africa.  Instead of being berated and ridiculed for their backward  activities and beliefs, for the sake of religion and going ooogie-boogie-boogie and off on a rampaging warpath like the savages they want to be, it is ignored.  On their part, their insane behaviors should not be ignored.  Instead, such people  as those who drink camel urine 
--  (e.g.Saudi Arabian Medical Journal Report from King Faisal University in or about January 2010, by Amira Hassan Abdullah Al-Abdalall, department of Botany and Micro-biology) --  and most of them seem to just puke it back up, Muslims and idiots of all other accepting cultures demand that these piss-drinking jackasses degrading their humanity are somehow to be deemed as enlightened  Muslims? 

So what's the next step logical step to Islamic piety?  Suck the Camel's sex organ and be an extra special Muslim?   Hell, the camel will be bringing more than just his head in the Muslim's face asking for more, and if drinking camel urine is so special, then the true Mohammedan Muslim should just go suck it, I guess.

It's time for Islam to get a new bumper sticker slogan: 
Allah and His prophet Mohammed says: 
"Make that camel happy!"   

Only it isn't just camel private parts "real Muslims" should be sucking off...their own medical journals infer they should be sucking off the urine of goats, and dogs, and buffalo, and elephants, and what have you.  Perhaps instead of invading and raping the women of Europe, Muslims should fulfill their destiny and copulate the pets and animals of the zoos of Europe and drink their urine right from the source that their religion teaches is a virtue to do.  In fact, pet stores should be pushing the have a miniature Mohammedi dog pee in your morning cup of coffee as the new nutritional morning kick-start of the day.   They can even make little Muslim prayer caps these Muslims can put on their dog’s head, as they lay them on the miniature Persian rugs and point the dog toward Mecca during morning prayers.  When the mutt howls during prayer, maybe the Muslims can realize what dogs they really are and go bark at the moon while they’re at it. 

Then, with the Al Qaeda and ISIS demanding a more literal following of Mohammed as their example, we can expect to see many thousands of these Muslims to target 12 year old girls and rip the clothes and underwear off of those who are menstruating, and to themselves be dressed in women's clothing at the time, in order to be more like Mohammed because that is what Mohammed did with Aisha in order to sexually arouse himself and recite the Quran to the pen and parchment of Aisha (who could read and write, while Mohammed could not).  

 Surah 6:296: “Said 'Aisha: The Prophet {Mohammed} used to lean on (and into) my lap and recite Qur'an while I was menstruating.”

Obama demands that Muslim terrorists, regardless of where they are in the world, regardless of they NOT being citizens of the United States or on U.S. soil committing atrocities, be protected by the Constitution of the United States.

Obama proclaimed at the United Nations on September 25, 2012 
“The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam.”

Hey Obama,
Allah and His prophet Mohammed says: 
"Make that camel happy!"   

 "Hey Obama.  Go make a camel happy!"     Yee-ha!  

In the past, the Muslims that Obama puts in the White House, that he supported specifically in Egypt as a Government entity, the Muslim organization which his family in Kenya belongs and actively participates in, the Muslims who not only founded Hamas terrorism but are also themselves co-founders and participants of ISIS in Syria and elsewhere, and Muslims who aided in the assassination of United States Ambassador Stevens on September 11, 2012; these Obama Muslims of the Muslim Brotherhood  have made it plain that they have a plan to subjugate America for Islam, or to destroy it if they cannot.
Page 19:  "...the Movement must plan and struggle to  obtain "the keys" and the tools of this process in carry out this grand mission as a "Civilization Jihadist" responsibility...."

Page 21:  "4- Understanding the role of the Muslim Brother in North America:
The process of settlement is a "Civilization-Jihadist Process" with all the word means.The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and "sabotaging" its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and Allah’s religion is made victorious over all other religions. Without this level of understanding, we are not up to this challenge and have not prepared ourselves for Jihad yet. It is a Muslim's destiny to perform Jihad and work wherever he is and wherever he lands until the final hour comes, and there is no escape from that destiny except for those who chose to slack. But, would the slackers and the Mujahedeen be equal."

Page 25: "In brief we say: we would like for the Islamic center to become "The House of Dawa"' and "the general center" in deeds first before name. As much as we own and direct these centers at the continent level, we can say we are marching successfully towards the settlement of Dawa' in this country.

Meaning that the "center's" role should be the same as the "mosque's" role during the time of
  [Mohammed] Allah's  prophet, Allah's prayers and peace be upon him, when he marched to "settle" the Dawa' in its first generation in Madina.   From the mosque, he drew the Islamic life and provided to the world the most magnificent and fabulous civilization humanity knew [as Islam]

This mandates that, eventually, the region, the branch and the Usra turn into "operations rooms" for planning, direction, monitoring and leadership for the Islamic center in order to be a role model to be followed 
[for the eventual subjugation and taking over the nation for Islam]."

In theology, there is not much difference in the psychological hate that Major Hasan and Obama both have for the United States of America.  And it is a disregard for thousands of Iraq and Afghanistan War Veterans that the U.S. Army and those who support Obama have in regard to that emotional damage and stress that scum major Hasan put upon the veterans he "treated" (or rather, "verbally victimized and hid behind rank and pretended religious authority that the religion of Psychiatry demands it has).   Indeed, to this very day now just over 6 years later, the intentionally psychological abuse of Major Hasan on returning overseas military combat veterans has never been nor will ever be addressed by an illegal to even be in power Administration that sides with ISIS terrorists and a Muslim Usurper who openly warns ISIS / AL QAEDA  45 minutes in advance of U.S. Airstrikes
and which also thwarts at least 75 percent of any U.S. Military airstrike efforts against those enemies we are at war with,
 meaning Obama OPENLY COMMITS CONSTITUTIONALLY DEFINED TREASON and there is NO legitimate legal excuse that Congress can give for NOT immediately impeaching him.  NONE.

While traveling to Muslim Countries around the World in November 2015, while in Turkey, Obama said: “…  the Muslim community has to think about how WE make sure that children are not being affected with this twisted notion that somehow they can kill innocent people.”   From the Muslim perspective, because Obama was talking exclusively to and with a Muslim audience in Turkey, those who are deemed “innocent people in Islam”  are only those who they say “affirm the Quran and are Muslim by declaratory faith” to be themselves “Muslim.”  All others are supposed to be guilty and never viewed as “innocent”.  That is the Muslim context Obama speaks in.  

In effect, Obama chronically and ever sides with the actions of Major Hasan in both his non-violent psychological jihad guilt-trip indoctrination on returning U.S. Army Veterans who killed Muslim enemies of war, and Obama sides with the violent jihadi actions Major Hasan felt he was able to then progress to after that “non-violent jihad” Obama views himself as now engaging in as well.

On November 5, 2009, Major Hasan opened fire on unarmed U.S. troops, killing 13 and wounding some 30 others while shouting how that Allah (or Satan, Islam’s deity) was great, in Arabic.  Obama demanded it be labeled as workplace violence and refused it as domestic terrorism, lest any “purple hearts” be handed out and actually honor military victims of Major Hasan’s pro-Quran pro-Islam attack on U.S. troops while effectually openly declaring his allegiances to be siding with Al Qaeda in the attack.

On November 21, 2015, Obama happily spoke to exclusively Muslim audiences in Malaysia.   Curiously, it is how Malaysia treats non-Muslims that Obama wants to duplicate here in the United States.  As a Muslim, Obama believes in a ban on any and all non-Muslim religious groups.  Obama also believes in restrictions on proselytizing anyone away from Islam, while encouraging the activity of jihad proselytizing America's kids to Islam in the United States School Systems, for example.  The lyrics of one of these jihadi fight song proselytization can be seen at 

Obama Satire That Must Just Not Be?
As a Muslim, Obama believes there should be prohibitions on the freedom to change one’s religion away from Islam, but never a restriction on TO Islam.  Only a Muslim believes that way.  You know, the people who believe that drinking animal urine, even as they puke it back up, is just one way of proving the Quran is to be believed and followed...while in the rest of Western Society, such people who openly drank their pet's urine generally would be committed to a lunatic asylum, and rightfully so.  Perhaps P.E.T.A. should check to see if Obama’s dog and Obama's mouth have any signs of related venereal disease in case he is copulating and claiming "it's not sex" in a new and improved Clinton oral sex scandal.  So this time if the victim is accused of being a dog...yeah, I guess it would be literal if that were to be the case.  

But Seriously…
As a Muslim, Obama will soon be pushing the Islamic Sharia Agenda that states that “Islamic authorities" have the right to forcibly enter private residences in order to "catch Muslims" engaging in non-Sharia activities and having the power to arrest or punish on scene.  That punishment can be beatings, whippings, property confiscation, raping, and murder of any or everybody there as directed by a Sharia Judge or empowered by Sharia Court representative to do whatever is pleasing in his eyes in behalf of enforcement.  

 And once that  door is opened, in those de jure U.S. foreign occupied or Sharia taken over neighborhoods and towns, they would then do the same to non-Muslims  --
to forcibly enter private  residences in order to "catch those" engaging in non-Sharia activities and to arrest and / or punish 
-- and terrorize under the color of authority and rape and kill and steal and destroy and be labeled faithful to the Quran.  Under Sharia, they can even go cannibal and literally eat unbelievers.   As I have cited previously, that inclusion of cannibalism is not just for what the Muslim Brotherhood members of ISIS / Al Qaeda are doing in the fields of war against the livers and hearts of enemy soldiers, but it is precisely a confirmed barbaric behavior that the Obama endorsed and spiritual guides of Obama Muslim Brotherhood led Muslims in Egypt  in 2012 taught their Muslim kids: 

"We are allowed the eating of flesh of dead humans under necessary conditions.  It must not be cooked or grilled to avoid doing wrong.  And, he can kill a murtadd  [an apostate, that includes Christians and Jews] and eat him. "

-- Al-Azhar al-Sharif, Azhari Colleges Section, Central Administration for Books, Libraries, and Teaching Aides for 3rd Year High School, page 256. 

It is high time that Obama's political career receives the Black Ace, and that he legally be tried and convicted for TREASON, and be given the maximum war-time penalty by speedy trial (perhaps an hour or less) and legal due process in 24 hours or less from his arrest, just like his Communist heroes dished out in 24 hour or less judgments to those they deemed as the enemies of the PEOPLE during that same Leninist Revolution he is so fond of.  

Wednesday, November 18, 2015

Inconvenient Warning: Obama Backs ISIS / Al Qaeda Against U.S. Citizens Of All Races, Colors, and Non-Muslim Creeds -- Apparently 1.5 Billion Bullets Already Reserved for ISIS Invasion / Internal U.S. War On U.S. Citizens

This is a followup to:


On March 28, 2011, Barack Obama took to the airwaves and said:
 "Good evening. Tonight, I'd like to update the American people on the international effort that we have led in Libya - what we have done, what we plan to do, and why this matters to us.
...when our interests and values are at stake, we have a responsibility to act. That is what happened in Libya over the course of these last six weeks.
...Journalists were arrested, sexually assaulted, and killed.
...We knew that if we waited one more day, Benghazi - a city nearly the size of Charlotte - could suffer a massacre that would have reverberated across the region and stained the conscience of the world. It was not in our national interest to let that happen. I refused to let that happen.
[Never mind that Obama turns a blind eye on the massacre of hundreds of thousands of Christians in the Sudan, in Iraq, or in Syria being slaughtered by Muslims for the cause of Islam simply because they are NOT Muslims.]
...Some nations may be able to turn a blind eye to atrocities in other countries. The United States of America is different. And as President, I refused to wait for the images of slaughter and mass graves before taking action.
...As Commander-in-Chief, I have no greater responsibility than keeping this country safe. And no decision weighs on me more than when to deploy our men and women in uniform. I have made it clear that I will never hesitate to use our military swiftly, decisively, and unilaterally when necessary to defend our people, our homeland, our allies, and our core interests.
That is why we are going after
[after – includes the definition of: “in accordance with and with the name of or a name derived from that of”]
al Qaeda wherever they seek a foothold.
... history is on the move in the Middle East and North Africa, and that young people are leading the way."
Obama indeed has claimed he will bring terrorism to the West as the one who will enable the Mahdi to bathe the world in fire and blood back in June 2009 at Cairo, by bringing up the story of Isra. And through that reference, Obama unmistakably informed the Muslims of the world that he is here on Earth to promote Islam. He is so dedicated to that cause beforehand, Obama wears a ring on his wedding finger -- (a ring on his wedding finger that he has never replaced with a wedding band nor has he added a wedding band when he married some 10 plus years later) -- a Shahada ring worn since his Occidental college days which states part of the Muslim Prayer of faith in Allah and Mohammed only.

Obama warned in advance he was backing Al Qaeda and joins those who wish to destroy America. 

When you learn to take interpret him by either his duplicity or his playing with word definitions, you will see he is as clear and as nuts as Hitler was to the "Socialist Government" of Germany, and his followers today are just as fanatical, if not way more, that as were the Socialists of Germany in the 1930s and early 1940s. Only they embrace a Communist brand of Socialism while the Industrialists view National Socialism as if Communism -D and Fascism -R were merely interchangeable with the labels of Democrat and Republican. So yeah, he will migrate Al Qaeda and ISIS to America.  And  furthermore, you know those 3,000,000,0000  / three billion plus bullets Homeland Security bought in 2012 - 2013? 

    "DHS officials have repeatedly denied stockpiling ammunition, but AP reports claim that the agency plans to buy more than 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition over the next four or five years, and has already bought 360,000 rounds of hollow point bullets and 1.5 billion rounds in 2012."
RT April 30, 2013

See also:

Guess who expects about half of them along with the weapons and magazines to use them.   The migrant pseudo-refugees or de facto the INVADING ARMIES OF AL QAEDA /ISIS that will be NOT be even tracked 
that Obama (an alien usurper of the U.S. Presidency) demands we import at 100,000 strong now, and perhaps several millions later.  

Sunday, November 15, 2015

Obama and Brennan Use ISIS To Kill Over 129 In Paris -- And It Is Clearly A Logical Progression And Escalation

Hat tip to the Drudge Report for these first 5 links: 


The Islamic terror attacks are directly linked to an escalation of Charlie Hebdo. The Islamic terror attacks are in direct relationship to the Obama -Soros - Sutherland (International chairman of Goldman Sachs) forced Muslim men of military age migration conquest and rape of Europe campaign in these last 5 months. We know for a FACT that the United States under and through Obama, a foreign usurper pretending to be POTUS by benign consent to criminally subvert the Constitution -- (because without a US Citizen father he is NOT a United States Natural Born Citizen as required by the U.S. Constitution) -- the United States has become a nation-state sponsor of Al Qaeda and ISIS terrorism; a sponsor of Christian genocide in the Iraq, Libya, and Syria; and a sponsor of malicious anti-Caucasian as well as anti-Christian hatred both in America and now in Europe. The United States has given to BILLIONS of U.S. Tax dollars to Al Qaeda and ISIS, and that funding is directly influenced and over-sighted at some capacity by John Brennan at CIA (the guy whose security company just "happened" to steal Obama's passport and files info from the U.S. Department of State in March 2008 and who himself blackmailed his way into a top Counter-terrorism post, etc.). Just hours before the massacre of 129 plus and wounding 350 plus in the Paris attack by Islamic terrorists who weren't humanitarian refugees after all, who was in France barking at the French? Oh yeah, John Brennan. A MUSLIM convert.

What's more, there was that all too convenient cyber-attack that took out French Security 48 hours prior to the Islamic Terrorist Attacks in Paris 

 that could only have come from a level of sophistication of a major Western NATO membered foreign power like the United States.

Obama indeed has claimed he will bring terrorism to the West as the one who will enable the Mahdi to bathe the world in fire and blood back in June 2009. At Cairo, by bringing up the story of Isra, Obama informed the Muslims of the world that he is here on Earth to promote Islam.


In this Cairo June 2009 speech based on Chapter 6 of a book written by a Muslim fanatic, Imam Feisal Abdul Rauf, chief agitator who is the same New York City front-man Imam who pushed for the Ground Zero Mosque, Obama referenced and called himself Baraq of the story of Isra, the winged jack-ass of the coming Mahdi to the heavens, the same Mahdi of Iranian Shia sect prophecy (on which Obama was reared on in Jakarta, Indonesia as a child), who will bathe the world in blood for Islam and kill all who will not submit to Islam, and burn the world with fire. That “burn the world with fire” includes a nuclear annihilation, which is why he has successfully given a treaty that emasculates U.S. nukes and counts empty launchers and conventional bombers and subs as if they are nuclear tipped ICBMs themselves.

Obama is always quick to offend U.S. Patriots in preference of Muslim Dominions encroachment by declaration of occupation or by acts of violence or by preferential speech for them while infringing on Constitutional free speech of any opposition.

Obama has proselytized Islam on the entire Executive Branch of the Federal Government of the United States, and has NO HESITATION in praising Islamic Clerics who issue fatwas to kill citizens of the United States (including those in the U.S. military serving overseas).

In the United States, in an act of Treason pushed aside as “political correctness”, Obama had an Islamic declaration of victory by a Muslim traitor’s father on the grounds of the White House
former C.I.A. Operations Officer Claire Lopez wrote in regard to what Obama invited and had Berdahl’s father do on international television at the White House, that:
“What none of these media is reporting is that the father’s (SGT Bowe Bergdahl’s father Bob) first words at the WH were in Arabic – those words were “bism allah alrahman alraheem” – which means “in the name of Allah the most gracious and most merciful” – these are the opening words of every chapter of the Qur’an except one (the chapter of the sword – the 9th) – by uttering these words on the grounds of the WH, Bergdahl (the father) sanctified the WH and claimed it for Islam. There is no question but POTUS knows this.

What no one is telling you in the Media, and even in the alternative Media, including Infowars, is for you to look at the fact that Obama in January 2009 put out the call to have 200 Muslim Brotherhood hired in his Administration (later scrub-a-dub-dubbed in the electronic Media accounts to hide what was once there and hence 1984ed) and that the likely figure (including Hillary’s Lesbian lover Huma) of the Muslim Brotherhood and sinister Muslim terrorist or Islamic terror sympathetic new hires (most by passing normal security background clearance procedures and checks) by February 2009 was allegedly up at or near 400, with an alleged 200 confirmed, not just the handful that are normally bandied about. And of that handful, you will note that some of these are who date back to Obama’s college days and who he knew when he went to Hyderabad of India in 1981 to participate in a self-flagellation jihadi indoctrination ritual that year.

In regard to a visit to Pakistan and India in 1981…
“The Obama campaign says Obama was in Pakistan for about three weeks, staying with his friend’s family in Karachi and also visiting Hyderabad in Southern India.”

Now the visit to Hyderabad India can be taken naively as a festival tour for those devoted to Mohammed:
And in the Mecca Masjid Hyderabad it is claimed that “a strand of …Mohammed’s hair is preserved in a room in the mosque’s courtyard.” 

“Muharram Flagellation
Muslims from the Shia community would also flagellate themselves with rods and sticks during the procession. They would even cut themselves with sharp objects like knives in public. This self-harming is also symbolic for commemorating the suffering faced by Husayn Ibn Ali and his followers.”

Then there’s the fact that Obama wears the ring which states part of the Muslim Prayer of faith in Allah and Mohammed only.

As long as Barack wears that ring, no Muslim may say he ever denies the Shahada or in any way ceases to be a Muslim, no matter how many times or how stringently he denies being a Muslim or jihadi or proclaims a faith of what is an infidel to a Muslim. And remember, the ENTIRE TIME Obama attended the black racist and race baiter Jeremiah Wright’s Church, claiming passively to be a Christian, Barack wore the ring of Allah and the Shahada testifying of his own first and primary spiritual marriage to the Devil, that is to Allah and (his schizophrenic liar, murderer, and rapist including child sex predator) Mohammed.

Under and through the Islamic Proselytizer many ISIS / Al Qaeda members were trained by U.S. Special Forces in Jordan (circa February 2012 to early 2014) by order of Obama, received Chemical Weapons training http://www.wnd.com/2014/06/reports-rebels-trained-by-u-s-to-handle-chemical-weapons/ as well as expertise in small arms, mortars, anti-aircraft, artillery, man-pads, and rocket propelled grenades.

Obama’s own State Department designated Al Nusrah as Al Qaeda in December of 2012
and titled the memo: “Terrorist Designations of the al-Nusrah Front as an Alias for al-Qa'ida in Iraq”

In February 2013, it was admitted that $60,000,000 in body armor and night vision knowingly ended up by with al-Nusra, http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/9898541/US-set-to-send-direct-aid-to-Syrian-rebels-says-John-Kerry.html but instead of stopping, $60,000,000 in logistics to Al Qaeda, who we are legally at war with as a nation, was instead accelerated to AL QAEDA by Obama. By June of 2014, Susan Rice admitted that the funding to Terrorists to destabilize Syria, including Al Qaeda which does the bulk of the fighting and the bulk of the massacres and jihad in Syria, had by then exceeded $1,700,000,000. That’s 1.7 billion with a “b” dollars.

How many billions by now are we in the hole for? 6 or 8 or 12 billion dollars? Seriously, we just do not know and it is a MAJOR SCANDAL and activity prosecutable as definite Constitutional TREASON.

The U.S. Constitution defines this act as TREASON,
Article III.
Section. 3
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. 

as does U.S. Code in upholding the Constitution of the United States, also state:

18 U.S. Code § 2381 - Treason
"Whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned 
not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States."

Again, look at Obama’s Islamic terrorist jihadi intent in his June 2009 Cairo speech and the loyalties and ties he has had to that Muslim Brotherhood organization in Egypt and elsewhere. There is definite leaked top secret info in the public sector that clearly tells you and anyone else having the ability to read English that the same Muslim Brotherhood organization Obama employs and has peppered the United States Federal Government with and allied himself with, that same Muslim Brotherhood is deeply embedded into and part of ISIS http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2015/05/newly-declassified-u-s-government-documents-the-west-supported-the-creation-of-isis.html …you know, the ones claiming responsibility for the 7 separate Paris terror attacks in the story above. On this issue, do the research, break it wide open, and expose the United States terrorist campaign against Europe and the Middle East from Obama and those supporting his terror agenda, coming soon to YOU with the same jihadi spit and contempt as they do as they rape their way across Germany and Sweden and suppress the Media reports on the real crime statistics.

To me, this is that "INCONVENIENT TRUTH ABOUT THE PARIS ATTACKS That They Don't Want You To Know" as Infowars would put it.