Welcome! Jesus Christ is my LORD and Savior! Romans 10:9-10,13; John 3:16

[For EU visitors, I do not personally use cookies, but Google or any clickable link (if you choose to click on it) might. This is in compliance with mandatory EU notification]

At this site, I discuss politics with a Right-Wing Conservative view that is pro-environmental, is in the defense of the freedom that is our birthright, and will go into detail discussing Conservative Fundamental Protestant Christian Theology that is pro-Zionist.

At times I will post some poems or other literary things I write, and may often post various entertainment or educational videos that I find of interest, and hope you will, too.

Thank you for coming, and feel free to also visit Frontsight or one of the recommended site links. You may also submit comments through the moderation process, or simply vote in a check off box below each article.
In the Year of our LORD Jesus Christ

Statement of Principle: Barack Obama is NOT a United States Natural Born Citizen, and illegally holds office. He is a foreign usurper enabled by all three Federal Branches in Conspiracy to the subversion and disregard of the United States Constitution in criminally reckless disregard to our laws. The criminally irresponsible behavior of all 3 branches of our Federal Government from 2008 to present day is begetting and growing a lawless and tyrannical Government by gradual encroachments.

"No Person except a Natural Born Citizen…shall be eligible to the Office of President...."
US Constitution: Article 2, section 1, Clause 5

The Original Constitutional Intent of a Natural Born Citizen at the time and era it was written is defined in this: that a child is born to a US CITIZEN Father at the Time of Birth, on US Soil or exclusive US Sovereignty, (this includes those born upon a US Flagship on direct water passage in International Waters IF it is so done between soil of the United States to soil of the United States); and that the child has NO OTHER CITIZENSHIP(S) OR ALLEGIANCE(S) FROM BIRTH TO AGE 21.

The Founders utilized John Locke for this definition:“This holds in all the laws a man is under, whether natural or civil. Is a man under the law of nature? What made him free of that law? what gave him a free disposing of his property, according to his own will, within the compass of that law? I answer, a state of maturity wherein he might be supposed capable to know that law, that so he might keep his actions within the bounds of it. When he has acquired that state, he is presumed to know how far that law is to be his guide, and how far he may make use of his freedom, and so comes to have it; till then, some body else must guide him, who is presumed to know how far the law allows a liberty. If such a state of reason, such an age of discretion made him free, the same shall make his son free too. Is a man under the law of England? What made him free of that law? that is, to have the liberty to dispose of his actions and possessions according to his own will, within the permission of that law? A capacity of knowing that law; which is supposed by that law, at the age of one and twenty years, and in some cases sooner. If this made the father free, it shall make the son free too. Till then we see the law allows the son to have no will, but he is to be guided by the will of his father or guardian, who is to understand for him. And if the father die, and fail to substitute a deputy in his trust; if he hath not provided a tutor, to govern his son, during his minority, during his want of understanding, the law takes care to do it; some other must govern him, and be a will to him, till he hath attained to a state of freedom, and his understanding be fit to take the government of his will. But after that, the father and son are equally free as much as tutor and pupil after nonage; equally subjects of the same law together, without any dominion left in the father over the life, liberty, or estate of his son, whether they be only in the state and under the law of nature, or under the positive laws of an established government.”
John Locke, Second Treatise on Government, Chapter 6: ‘Of Paternal Power’ §. 59

"...the term ‘natural born citizen’ is used and excludes all persons owing allegiance by birth to foreign states.”
The New Englander and Yale Law Review, Volume 3 (1845), p. 414

In May of 2009, Barack Obama and the Government of the United States of America officially recognized Kogelo, Kenya, as the birth place of the putative President of the United States, Barack Hussein Obama II. It was attended by U.S. Ambassador Michael Ranneberger. The official Kenyan Government memo, Compiled by: Agwanda, J.O., ASDD and Comissioned by: Machage, T. N . , SDD
states very clearly and absolutely unmistakably that: “This was to honour the birthplace of President Barack Obama and re-dedicate the tomb of Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., the president's late father.”

Under Constitutional Intent of the Natural Born Citizen Clause in Article 2.1.5, the successful US Government Attorney of later Wong Kim Ark fame shows us that the Paternal Link (that through the Father's Status) is essential in determining who is or is NOT a United States Natural Born Citizen:
Birth, therefore, does not ipso facto confer citizenship, and is essential in order that a person be a native or natural born citizen of the United States, that his father be at the time of the birth of such person a citizen thereof, or in the case he be illegitimate, that his mother be a citizen thereof at the time of such birth. – GEORGE D. COLLINS, SAN FRANCISCO, CAL.”

“…at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was ...a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.”
http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/does_barack_obama_have_kenyan_citizenship.html {link since removed}

Rep. A. Smyth (VA), House of Representatives, December 1820:
When we apply the term “citizens” to the inhabitants of States, it means those who are members of the political community. The civil law determined the condition of the son by that of the father. A man whose father was not a citizen was allowed to be a perpetual inhabitant, but not a citizen, unless citizenship was conferred on him."

Since Barack Obama depends upon "operation of law" to claim citizenship status, he is NOT a United States NATURAL born citizen, and fails to meet Constitutionality.

Ex Parte Bain, 121 U.S. 1 (1887) @ 12
"It is never to be forgotten that in the construction of the language of the Constitution here relied on, as indeed in all other instances where construction becomes necessary, we are to place ourselves as nearly as possible in the condition of the men who framed that instrument."

Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U. S. 1 (1824) @ 188-189 http://supreme.justia.com/us/22/1/case.html states:
" ...the enlightened patriots who framed our Constitution, and the people who adopted it, must be understood to have employed words in their natural sense, and to have intended what they have said. If, from the imperfection of human language, there should be serious doubts respecting the extent of any given power, it is a well settled rule that the objects for which it was given, especially when those objects are expressed in the instrument itself, should have great influence in the construction."

Thomas Jefferson, in his letter to William Johnson, dated June 12, 1823 from Monticello, wrote:
"On every question of construction [of the Constitution] let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or intended against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed."

Holmes v. Jennison, 39 U.S. (14 Peters) 540 (1840)@ 570-571 http://supreme.justia.com/us/39/540/case.html
“In expounding the Constitution of the United States, every word must have its due force and appropriate meaning, for it is evident from the whole instrument that no word was unnecessarily used or needlessly added. The many discussions which have taken place upon the construction of the Constitution have proved the correctness of this proposition and shown the high talent, the caution, and the foresight of the illustrious men who framed it. Every word appears to have been weighed with the utmost deliberation, and its force and effect to have been fully understood. No word in the instrument, therefore, can be rejected as superfluous or unmeaning, and this principle of construction applies …”

The various terms of Citizen in the US Constitution are described in this pdf. http://www.scribd.com/doc/11737124/Citizenship-Terms-Used-in-the-US-Constitution-The-5-Terms-Defined-Some-Legal-Reference-to-Same

By having a Foreign National Father, and a foreign citizenship at birth and retained to his 23rd birthday, and / or a renunciation of US Citizenship declared by his mother to the US Consulate and signed under oath on August 13 of 1968 to declare her son absolved of US Citizenship for an Indonesian one, http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/05/orly-taitz-still-standing-new-lawsuits.html

Barack Hussein Obama II is UNCONSTITUTIONAL and UNQUALIFIED for the Office of US President.


Elk v. Wilkins, 112 US 94 (1884) @ 101-102 states that:
"The main object of the opening sentence of the fourteenth amendment was …to put it beyond doubt that all persons, white or black, and whether formerly slaves or not, born or naturalized in the United States, and OWING NO ALLEGIANCE TO ANY ALIEN POWER, should be citizens of the United States and of the state in which they reside. Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall. 36, 73; Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303, 306."

Obama owed allegiance to both the United Kingdom (Great Britain) and Kenya at birth, regardless if he was born in the US or not. Only by complete dishonesty can anyone label the man a qualified occupant of the Presidency. Ipso facto and de jure, he is not legally President of the United States, and his entire occupancy is legally voidable. His short form is so easily reproductive forgery, it might as well say Mickey Hussein Mouse as it does here: http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x13/Mactographer/birth_certificate_2-1.jpg

On January 19, 2011
and on January 25, 2011

it was almost conclusive in the journalistic sense, that the only thing on file in Hawaii as regards Obama is a data entry of : "Obama II, Barack Hussein, Male...." instead of any United States Birth Certificate or Certification of Live Birth.

"The burden of establishing a delegation of power
to the United States,
or the prohibition of power to the States,
is upon those making the claim."
Bute v. Illinois, 333 U.S. 640 @653 (1948)

That means it is upon Obama and/or his lawyers to produce Court admissible documents establishing his birth identity with location and witnesses to the birth (cf. Nguyen v. INS 533 US 53 (2001) @ 54,62), - -

Nguyen v. INS 533 US 53 (2001) @ 54,62 http://supreme.justia.com/us/533/53/
@ 54 : “The mother's relation is verifiable from the birth itself and is documented by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses to the birth.”
@62:” In the case of the mother, the relation is verifiable from the birth itself. The mother's status is documented in most instances by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses who attest to her having given birth.”

- - as well as having a US Citizen father age 21 or above at the time of birth.

John Jay’s letter to George Washington, July 25, 1787 states:
“Permit me to hint whether it would not be wise and seasonable to provide a strong check to the admission of foreigners into the administration of our national government; and to declare expressly that the commander in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on any but a natural born citizen.

It is clear that a “natural born citizen” in John Jay’s intent is someone WITHOUT dual or multiple nationalities, but has only one since birth: that of the US by both parents and geography, and NO OTHER.

In 1874, the US Supreme Court ruled that as it regards Common Law, that if we follow that model, not only did a US Citizen Father have to be present to make one a US Natural Born Citizen, but a US Citizen Mother also. And that formula of Common Law is also operative vice versa in the phrase: “all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens “, that without a US Citizen Father, you could NOT be defined as a United States Natural Born Citizen, PERIOD!!!

At common-law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”
Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1874) @167
(see also how Justia.com tried to bury this key reference case @ http://www.americanthinker.com/2011/12/justiagate_natural_born_supreme_court_citations_disappear.html )

On June 6, 1951, President Truman signed the 1951 British Treaty between the United States of America and the United Kingdom / Great Britain. This Treaty, ratified by the United States Senate, took effect on September 7, 1952. This Treaty authorizes the British Consulate to register the birth of British Subjects born in the United States of America, establishing a British jurisdiction over US Born Citizens of a British Citizen parent or parents. The British consulate of the jurisdiction of the United States where they were found, including the territory and later state of Hawaii, and were thus authorized to give British passports to those like Barack Hussein Obama II as a British subject and United Kingdom and Colonies Citizen at the petition of a British Citizen parent, like Barack Hussein Obama I's request (Obama's father).
http://travel.state.gov/law/legal/treaty/treaty_1507.html (See also 8 USC 1101 (a) (15) (F) (i) http://www.gpoaccess.gov/uscode/ )

While Obama declares he was born in Hawaii http://www.scribd.com/doc/56732637/Obama-Declares-He-Was-Born-in-Hawaii
neither Obama, nor his lawyers, nor the US Attorneys have ever produced one shred of solid identifying evidence of the man's identity into Court Evidence in a Court of Law. They refuse to enter his Birth Certificate or Certification of Live Birth, whether long or short, because both are forgeries. Even though under 333 US 640, Bute v. Illinois (1948) @ 653 and 533 US 53, Nguyen v. INS (2001) @ 54,62 they are so required to produce into Court's Evidence, submitting them as authentic under penalty of perjury to the Courts. IT NEVER HAPPENED because they are knowingly fraudulent documents.

Then there is Obama’s 1995 confession of legal identity facts as of then:
"You know, as soon as the Old Man died,
the lawyers contacted all those who might have a claim to the inheritance.
Unlike my mum,
has all the documents needed to prove
who Mark's father was."
Dreams from My Father, p. 345 Barack Obama
(confessing there is NO Birth Certificate of any kind for him in Hawaii as of 1995)

Obama can therefore be required by Law to produce an authentic US Hospital Birth Certificate into Court Evidence, something he has NEVER done, nor have in lawyers remotely done in the one reference they made to pro-Obama blogs in Hollister v. Soetoro Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-02254-JR.What is it that Robert Bauer of Perkins Coie offered the Court the one time he even referred to substantiation in Hollister v. Soetoro Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-02254-JR? Legal FRAUD upon the Court.

“Fraud on the Court is conduct:
1) on the part of an officer of the Court;
2) that is directed to the judicial machinery itself;
3) that is intentionally false, willfully blind to the truth, or is in reckless disregard for the truth;
4) that is a positive averment or a concealment when one is under duty to disclose;
5) that deceives the Court.”
Workman v. Bell, 245 F.3d 849 (6th Circuit 2001) @ 852

{{{Quote from Hollister v. Soetoro, Footnote 1: }}}1 President Obama has publicly produced a certified copy of a birth certificate showing that he was born on August 4, 1961, in Honolulu Hawaii. See, e.g., Factcheck.org, “Born in the U.S.A.: The truth about Obama’s birth certificate,” available at http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html (concluding that the birth certificate is genuine, and noting a contemporaneous birth announcement published in a Honolulu newspaper). Hawaii officials have publicly verified that they have President Obama’s “original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.” See “Certified,” Honolulu Star Bulletin, Oct. 31, 2008. This Court can take judicial notice of these public news reports. See The Washington Post v. Robinson,935 F.2d 282, 291 (D.C. Cir. 1991); Agee v. Muskie, 629 F.2d 80, 81 n.1, 90 (D.C. Cir. 1980). {{{Unquote}}}

Obama CANNOT and will NOT produce a valid Birth Certificate into evidence in a Court of Law because both released long and short copies ARE FORGERIES.
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-long-form.pdf http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/04/white-house-releases-long-form-birth.html

Snopes.com, another pro-Obama partisan propaganda site, self-patting themselves on how factual they are when it comes to Obama, couldn’t even cite the correct alleged obstetrician it claimed delivered Obama. When the Obama forged Certification of Live Birth Long Form came out, their facts that “Rodney T. West delivered Obama in Hawaii” were cast aside as fables they promulgated to the gullible masses for over 2 years. http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=295265

The Office of the White House Press Secretary linked journalists and other interested parties to what they called an authentic Obama Short Form Certification of Live Birth, as vetted by Snopes.com. Unfortunately, the link went to Ron Polland’s made from Template Scratch openly attributed forgery, of which Polland said he was the creator. In other words, the White House sourced themselves in a genuine copy of a known public forgery which url even contained Dr. Polland’s previous internet pseudonym in the url / jpg address itself. http://i305.photobucket.com/albums/nn227/Polarik/BO_Birth_Certificate.jpg

Obama also uses an identity theft Social Security Number of a now deceased person 042-68-4425 http://www.scribd.com/doc/47560424/Affidavit-Regarding-Obamas-Social-Security-Numbers-Susan-Daniels for someone born in 1890 AND ISSUED IN CONNECTICUT in 1977-1979 as if a Tax ID number for most all his adult life. It is time for Congress to empower a special prosecutor and move to Criminal Filings against him, beginning with a subpoena duces tecum of his alleged identity documents under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedures 17(c) and "call his bluff".

In matter of fact, my quoting the Kenyan Media by the same standards as Bauer’s use of “The Washington Post v. Robinson,935 F.2d 282, 291 (D.C. Cir. 1991); Agee v. Muskie, 629 F.2d 80, 81 n.1, 90 (D.C. Cir. 1980)” is de facto and de jure not only just as relevant, but MORE relevant, as it sources a nation of birth, and a national citizenship at birth as jus soli in Kenya by Government confirmation, where the Hawaii newspaper announcements neither address nationality nor location at birth, only that a birth somewhere in the world occurred for people alleged to live at so-an-so an address.

The Nairobi Kenya Eastern Standard is the source of the Birther Movement, substantiated by other African Media and Kenya’s own Government Officials in Public Statement of fact in Transcript. Of primary concern is the Nairobi Kenya Eastern Standard dated as Sunday, June 27, 2004. Its headline reads:
“Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate”

The first line reads:“Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.”

De facto, the Nairobi Kenya Eastern Standard states clearly in the headline that Senator Barack Obama is Kenyan born...hence, born in Kenya. http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm

There are no other living witnesses besides Barack's step-grandmother, who says she saw him birthed, and she says THAT was in Kenya! http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=107524 and that claim was vetted twice by Kenya's Parliament, one of which in March of 2010!!!“

Thursday, 25th March, 2010
The House met at 2.30 p.m. p. 31 ...2nd paragraph
[Mr. Orengo, Minister of Lands of the nation of Kenya, speaking]: "...how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American,become the President of America?It is because they did away with exclusion." http://www.scribd.com/doc/29758466/RDRAFT25

In others words, NON-Natural born Citizens of the US can now be President of the USA, starting with Barack Hussein Obama!!! See also: http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/04/obama-fec-audited-in-2011-little-bit.html

In matter of fact, various Secretaries of States will declare to the effect that the States have no right to verify if a candidate running for President is even a US Citizen, let alone qualified.

{{{Quote}}} “…neither the Connecticut General Statutes nor the Constitution of the State of Connecticut authorizes me to investigate a Presidential candidate’s eligibility to run for the office of President of the United States.” Secretary of State, Susan Bysicwicz (Connecticut) November 26, 2008. http://moniquemonicat.files.wordpress.com/2008/11/obama-sec-of-state-connecticuit-fax-name-removed.pdfSee also: http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2010/01/was-obama-ever-vetted-as-qualified.html

It is a legal fact that Natural Born Citizenship is required to be a US President, which Obama does NOT have... NOT having the proper US Citizenship Credentials to produce into evidence in a COURT of Law, and especially by NOT BEING a UNITED STATES NATURAL BORN CITIZEN by the same principles of primogeniture and entail in regard to a sole US Citizenship (i.e., because he has NO US Citizen Father to Naturally take the place in Society of). Hence, he is a Usurper of the US Presidency, and an active criminal regularly committing felonies every time he acts or speaks in the fraudulently obtained office of the US Presidency.

Obama's own Mother declared Obama Jr. lost his US Citizenship as of August 13, 1968

Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro-Passport Application File-Strunk v Dept of State-FOIA Release-FINAL-7-29-10

Obama's Mother formally reported on her son so as to declare Obama Jr. lost his US Citizenship as of August 13, 1968 and denounced him officially before a Department of State Representative and signed such official documentation, intending that he had officially become a permanent Indonesian Citizen, absolved of any claim to a US nationality.

Obama's mother signed under oath on the back page of Form FS-299 of 7-64, following the instructions:

"I have not (and no other person included or to be included in the passport or documentation has), since acquiring United States citizenship, been naturalized as a citizen of a foreign state, taken an oath or made an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state…

{If any of the above-mentioned acts or conditions have been performed by or apply to the applicant, or to any other person included in the passport or documentation, the portion of which applies should be struck out , and a supplementary explanatory statement under oath (or affirmation) by the person to whom the portion is applicable should be attached and made a part of this application.}

Ann Dunham wrote Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah) and struck his name out to indicate that he was legally to no longer be a United States Citizen, and the document stood to apply all relevant passages that could apply to a 7 year old who lost US Citizenship by naturalization to Indonesia with a renunciation of his allegiance and renunciation of his citizenship by both he and his mother and his step-father for him.

Again, his own mother on August 13, 1968, before a Department of State consulate, denounced her son Barack Hussein Obama as having foreign allegiances and foreign naturalization to Indonesia, and signed to this effect in form FS-277, writing and striking his name out.

We must remember that:

Chin Bak Kan v. United States 186 U.S. 193 (1902) @ 200

We do not need a Presidential candidate or President so badly, that we have to go outside the pool of two citizen parents at their birth on US Soil for a President, regardless of the candidate's ethnicity. The DNC yielded to a known unqualified candidate as a means of desperation, as if the pressure of exigency to get their Party the Presidency in 2008, and discarded the sacred trust of the People of the United States in upholding the US Constitution, by offering the most powerful office in the world to a United Kingdom and Colonies foreign national turned resident of the United States who may or may not even have as much as a secondary US Citizenship under the Immigration and Naturalization Act of 1952's statutory law, if he indeed was born in Kenya as the media and Government of Kenya claims.

Under Original Intent and interpretation of the 14th Amendment, Obama fails to qualify as a 14th Amendment Citizen without a US Citizen Father and by having foreign dual or multi-national citizenship at birth:

The Congressional Globe, 1st session, May 30, 1866

The debate on the first section of the 14th Amendment


Senator Jacob Howard (R-Michigan) authored a "subject to the jurisdiction" clause into the 14th Amendment. Upon his introduction, the ff. are his remarks.

Part 4 (column 2), page 2890

Mr. Howard: The first amendment is to section one, declaring "that all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the States wherein they reside...This is simply declaratory of what I regard as the law of the land already, that every person born within the United States, and subject to their jurisdiction, is by virtue of natural law and national law a citizen of the United States. This will not, of course, include persons born in the United States who are foreigners, aliens, who belong to the families of ambassadors or foreign ministers accredited to the Government of the United States, but will include every other class of persons.

Senator Trumbull of Illinois, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee concurred:

Part 4 (columns 1-2), page 2893

Mr. Trumbull: The provision is, "that all persons born in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens." That means "subject to the complete jurisdiction thereof"... What do we mean by "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States"? Not owing alliance to anybody else. That is what it means.

...It cannot be said of any...who owes allegiance, partial allegiance if you please, to some other Government that he is "subject to the jurisdiction of the United States."

...It is only those persons who completely within our jurisdiction, who are subject to our laws, that we think of making citizens; and there can be no objection to the proposition that such persons should be citizens."

Part 4 (columns 2-3), page 2895

Mr. Howard: I concur entirely with the honorable Senator from Illinois, in holding that the word "jurisdiction" as here employed, ought to be construed so as to imply a full and complete jurisdiction on the part of the United States...that is to say, the same jurisdiction in extent and quality as applies to every citizen of the United States now.

Then we have the dilemma of Law Legislated under an illegal Obama Presidency.

The U.S. Supreme Court, in the case of Fletcher v. Peck, 10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 87 (1810) @ 87
The principle asserted is that one legislature is competent to repeal any act which a former legislature was competent to pass, and that one legislature cannot abridge the powers of a succeeding legislature. The correctness of this principle so far as it respects general legislation cannot be controverted. But if an act be done under a law, a succeeding legislature cannot undo it. The past cannot be recalled by the most absolute power.”

By NOT having a legal US President in Office, not one single piece of Legislature signed by Obama is "under law" unless one can show that it was voted on by a 2/3 majority in both the House of Representatives and the US Senate and would have passed anyway, even if Obama were not in Office to exert the influence he had in the office of the US Presidency he usurped / illegally held and illegally maintained by fraud or its variants. Therefore, the objection that might be cited in Fletcher v. Peck, 10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 87 (1810) @87 that a succeeding Congress cannot void out the legislation of a preceding Congress -- when that legislation in the preceding Congress was an illegal action via a signing or benign neglect affirmation by an illegal Executive -- is therefore easily overcome.

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803) @ 180 states that
“a law repugnant to the constitution IS VOID. . . .” and
“in declaring what shall be the SUPREME law of the land, the CONSTITUTION itself is first mentioned; and not the laws of the United States generally, but those only which shall be made in PURSUANCE of the constitution,have that rank.”

I advocate that we follow the US Constitution and the advice of the US Supreme Court for such a crisis as this, and VOID OUT Obama's entire Presidency!!! Amen!!!

To all true U.S. Patriots, Obama is and remains unforgiven,

and we remain justified in both saying and doing this, because it is the appropriate response to an "alien national" who has usurped the Presidency, who is absolutely unable to produce -- and his own lawyers refuse to put forth under penalty of committing felonies to attest to its unfraudulent veracity -- evidence of a United States Natural Born Citizenship to Barack Hussein Obama II in ANY U.S. Court of Law. They won't even place his alleged Birth Certificate or Social Security Card before the Court as genuine under penalty of perjury. Under Bute v. Illinois or 333 U.S. 640 (1948) @ 653, WE THE PEOPLE have the right to demand Barack Obama PROVE the right to his claim of the U.S. Constitution authorizing him, a suspected illegal alien and known foreign national, to the powers and authority vested in that of a President of the United States...who saw fit to help re-write a foreign (Kenyan) Constitution to include Islamic Sharia compliances and to make himself once again one of its current citizens while occupying and claiming to be "First Citizen" in the Presidency of the United States.

Peace and Liberty. Semper Fidelis.

Tuesday, October 25, 2016

2016 Texas State Official Openly Pushes Election Fraud , and Criminal Hillary With A Clearly Apparent 1980s Cocaine Co-Drug-Trafficker Hillary Past, Wants To Give You The Kind Of Mushrooms That Smoke You Instead

Never mind the Fraud and open stealing of elections against populist across all Major party Lines, Donald Trump.

Never mind that we know Hillary is a Criminal who never should have been able to even run, she is so law-breaking and evil.

Never mind that Donald Trump is the IDEAL of what America NEEDS in the Presidential Election 2016 and the only safe and sane choice to vote for November 8, 2016

Never mind that Hillary along with Bill Clinton, GOOFUS in the 1980s, is eyeball high deep in Cocaine Drug Trafficking of an average of more than 880 lbs  a week (that's 45,760 pounds or just about 23 tons of  Cocaine a year) into the United States as a co-conspirator with her husband Bill Clinton and that her role in Cocaine Drug Trafficking in the 1980s as Governor Clinton's enforcer is still suppressed and kept from the general public to this day, as a former CIA Intelligence Officer and black helicopter pilot who flew these drugs tagged as medical supplies, briefly documents a conversation while on a classified verification V.I.P. run  of  certain Central American based cocaine processing farms for Governor Clinton's personal State Police representative and an an Israel Mossad drug runner supplying Vice-President Bush and Wild Bill Casey of C.I.A.with the Clinton's demanding a 10% cut of drugs - money - benefits for their roles in drug smuggling and an inferred direct clear path to the Presidency for their roles as drug smugglers during the about an 8 minute segment at ca. 39:37ff:

Never mind all that reality...we want good mystery television.  We want  Nero Wolfe.  

Make the world go away...we want Nero Wolfe.  

But even so, Hillary can't leave you alone.  She wants to take all your guns, all your money, and introduce you to her idea of the kind of mushrooms you should be smoking...the kind which actually smoke YOU.  

Tuesday, October 18, 2016

October 18, 2016 - A Few Videos Regarding DNC and Hillary Clinton On Feminist Policy Toward Pushing Nuclear War Abuse, Hillary's Forward Together Bus Open Dumping of Human Waste, and More Where The DNC Benefits From Election Fraud (videos)

Alex Jones Interviews Michael Savage:
Obama Administration Feminists Want War Because They Are Mentally And Emotionally Unstable To Begin With

Meanwhile, the Hillary Clinton / DNC Campaign Bus Envisions that the "FORWARD TOGETHER" campaign slogan on the side of the bus means leaving their fecal matter and toilet paper all over an open street in  Lawrenceville, Georgia and just dump it down any old storm drain because that is what they think of Georgia and the average voter in America anyway.  

Meanwhile, Bill Still introduces more from James O'Keefe "Project Veritas" on the Democratic National Committee approved voter fraud, and this includes an undercover scooped admission from the Communist Party USA based People For The American Way's deputy political director Scott Foval,  that this has been standard practice for assisting the Democrats in voter fraud for 50 years now.  

David Knight of Infowars wraps up today's news with his perspective

Monday, October 17, 2016

Hillary Clinton Campaign Commits Obama Approved and Protected Domestic Terrorism As If Above The Law

 Oct 17, 2016

Bill Still features Project Veritas revealing that Hillary Clinton's Campaign sponsors Domestic Terrorism and law breaking activities (and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, a part of the Department of Justice refuses to prosecute because Lynch and others above them are so damn corrupt).  

Mayor Tom Stevens (D) of Hillsborough, NC with Fox Business News Neil Cavuto regarding the [Hillary Clinton / George Soros / Barack Obama  approved] firebombing of the Orange County GOP office.

Former Secret Service agent Gary Byrne joins the show to discuss the character of Hillary Clinton and what he saw during his time guarding her.

Bill Still features a post-interview news report of Hillary's September 7, 2016 display of her lousy extreme temper tantrum foul-mouthed character after Matt lauer offended her by asking her about her e-mails in which she declared she violated the Law so badly that "if Donald Trump is elected, we all hang from nooses."     She KNOWS she committed TREASON and MURDER and is destined to easy conviction and hanging?  Clearly so.

Come January 20, 2017, with an elected and sworn in Donald Trump, within minutes, there needs to be arrests and immediate prosecutions of Hillary and all those involved in her criminality.  A list of arrests and prepared evidence for warrant signatures need to commence rapidly and be followed through, and in fact be present in a brief case ready for submission and signature to execute warrants for arrest when Trump gets sworn in, right then.  And if we are lucky, Hillary will turn state's evidence on all her accessories in her treason and various hundreds of  felonious activities and be detailed to take them all down with her.  We can only hope.  The important thing now is for WE THE PEOPLE to do what little and what we can individually and together to NOT let her and the globalists and the hired Central Intelligence Agency STEAL the 2016 election by any fraud or criminal act they deem necessary.  

Sunday, October 16, 2016

Alex Jones Warns of Soros USA Policy Inducing War With Russia. Video And My Input.

While the United States might have some engagement that could result in major conventional losses to us, it is NOT ever likely that we will go nuclear with Russia because the Globalists have not yet fully emasculated our nuclear arsenal down to near zero.  Under the Obama Treaty with Russia, the USA now counts bomber planes capable of carrying nukes, the launchers themselves, the subs and the silos capable of carrying nukes AS nukes, even if there are no dead drop nukes, cruise nukes or MRBMs or ICBMs with nuke warheads in any way involved.  The details of his START TREATY were posted at:

P. 4
Article I11
1. For the purposes of counting toward the aggregate limit provided for in subparagraph l(a) of Article I1 of this Treaty:
(a) Each deployed ICBM shall be counted as one.
(b) Each deployed SLBM shall be counted as one.
(c) Each deployed heavy bomber shall be counted as one.
2. For the purposes of counting toward the aggregate limit provided for in subparagraph l(b) of Article I1 of this Treaty:

(a) For ICBMs and SLBMs, the number of warheads shall be the number of reentry vehicles emplaced on deployed ICBMs and on deployed SLBMs.

(b) One nuclear warhead shall be counted for each deployed heavy bomber.

3. For the purposes of counting toward the aggregate limit provided for in subparagraph l(c) of Article I1 of this Treaty:
(a) Each deployed launcher of ICBMs shall be counted as one.  [the language without specific clarification, based on 2b above, infers as one nuclear warhead].
(b) Each non-deployed launcher of ICBMs shall be counted as one.  [the language without specific clarification based on 2b above, infers as one nuclear warhead].
(c) Each deployed launcher of SLBMs shall be counted as one.  [the language without specific clarification based on 2 b above, infers as one nuclear warhead].
(d) Each non-deployed launcher of SLBMs shall be counted as one. [the language without specific clarification,  infers as one nuclear warhead].

In 1996, then President Bill Clinton signed a directive that only the President can authorize a nuclear submarine launch. The Presidential Decision Directive 60 (PDD-60) signed by Bill Clinton http://www.armscontrol.org/act/1997_11-12/focnov
goes beyond the stating that the US would not use nukes against non-nukes states, or would not allow a nuke launch until after a nuclear attack has been verified.  The power to hold the codes is in the hands of the putative President.  If the bombs are falling, and the putative President is inclined to kick back, put his feet up on the desk and wait it out, and the officer holding the Launch Codes decides to leave the room, the Secret Service can execute that officer for Treason, even though the alleged President by apathy is the one so doing the Treason as the nukes are going off.  Until the advent of Obama, such a scenario was utterly inconceivable by a President...but with the usurpation of  the America-hating Obama, one NOT Constitutionally even legal to hold the office and thus is presumed by NOT de facto legally there, but illegally ensconced with a 100% VOIDABLE time there and all laws passed while he was there thus legally voidable as well being absent any Constitutional authority because he is ABSOLUTELY NOT a UNITED STATES Natural Born Citizen, that very scenario could indeed become a reality.   The danger, then, is NOT from the Russians themselves, but from the usurper Obama. 

In the Obama Administration, that means the launch codes and authorization would not have to legally be decided upon being released to our land silos, nuclear storage facilities, and nuclear subs UNTIL the nukes are popping off on various US Cities, based on a prior Administration's Presidential Directive, and could merely use the ACLUese EXCUSE that the incoming missiles, regardless if it is a few to hundreds of them, the excuse being to the effect of:  "well they might be just merely be conventional warheads, and go land in the middle of nowhere and just make gopher holes in the deserts, fields, or woods somewhere". 

In her final speech as Secretary of State to the Council of Foreign Relations on January 31, 2013, Hillary Clinton spoke of a new infrastructure of Government in the making which will replace this one...one that is seen as a new dynamic as exciting and geometric as was the Parthenon of Greece in its day; [and then about 3 minutes later] in a world where society is seen as either Democratic or Totalitarian.  She excluded the option of there even being room for a Republic or Republicans to exist, let alone any number of small splinter parties be they Independent, Libertarian, Green, or any other name.

Preceding all this current hysteria with Russia, as is happening with the Department of State under Kerry and the Irish Republican Army terrorist wannabe Samantha Powers, Alex Jones is the opening video to this blog piece is both getting AND missing the right screen in which it is technically an election strategy HYPE to manipulate international tensions and focus to domestically election fraud and vote fabrication and to in whatever illegal way "garner" votes for Hillary by having people LOOK AWAY from what FRAUD they are going to try to commit on November 8, 2016.

But in order to see why a "first strike" nuclear war is NOT advantageous to Russia now, let us re-examine what Obama did for their Manchurian Compact partner, the Chinese in giving away first strike nuclear capability for which he should have been arrested, tried, convicted, executed with both a Supreme Court Chief Justice and the Senate presiding in passing sentence that he committed such an offense worthy of execution.  

        On July 6, 2012, the illegal to be in power Obama Administration ensured a preliminary (allegedly Continental United States) Internet kill-switch and black-out communications technologies and capabilities put into place.

In February 2013,  the citizens of the United States were nationally made aware that  the Chinese Government has most of  an entire building that its Government operates as a hacking base in Shanghai. 

In the China Daily News, some 6 months after the event, they too did a story and had watched the video of the United States "Aurora Generator Test".  Of interest is a quote near the end of the China Daily News article of a Security Expert who states:

"What keeps your lights on are some very, very old technology," said Joe Weiss, a security expert who has testified before Congress about such threats. "If you can get access to these systems, you can conceptually cause them to do whatever it is you want them to do."

The alternative Media and alert American Patriots already know that the illegal  Obama Administration committed yet another of its long line of acts of  TREASON (and in this case, open violations which could charge those like Obama and those who authorized such data transfer and sharing to foreign governments with espionage) when it shared the electro-magnetic vulnerabilities of the United States first with Russian military troops on U.S. soil (in Colorado)  in 2012, and then with Chinese Army Troops on U.S. soil (in Hawaii)  in November 2013
 by inviting the foreign adversarial or enemy forces of the Chinese Army to observe first-hand a top secret operation of a simulated nuclear explosion designed to destroy the U.S. Utility and Communications grids over the Continental U.S.,  even though the Chinese Army have specifically and PUBLICLY gone on record in the past several years that they wish to soon use this very tactic to destroy the United States by an inferred sneak attack upon us.

That's what we did for the Chinese, but back track to a year earlier, and you will find Obama did exactly the SAME THING for the Russians as with the Chinese, as I refer above to Russian troops on U.S. soil in Colorado in 2012, learning how to neutralize the United States and make a successful first strike.  If Obama and then Hillary are determined to see our nukes go to zero as nothing more than empty of nuke warhead bombers and empty of nuke warhead silos and empty of nuke warhead launchers, do you REALLY think the Russians or their current leader Vladimir Putin will be goaded into any kind of a nuclear war with us when (if they wait just a few years more) they can utterly annihilate this nation without any losses on their side except from radioactive fallout from the other side of the planet carried there?  Hell no, they won't be goaded.  As for the radioactive fallout that travels across the planet statement,  statement, I refer to two events in the 1970s which was blacked out and far too many Americans have memory suppressed and intentionally forgotten.  At that time, two Chinese Hydrogen bombs were tested and exploded above ground in CHINA which  did this across the world and upon the United States fall-out effect and gave Americans the experience of witnessing  the radioactive atmospheric debris in glowing red clouds that lit green grass as purple at night as it crossed from California to New Jersey in June of 1975.  This was duplicated again in October 1976. It is a blacked out news event that those of us who are of age will remember, especially those of us who spent hours under these night clouds as witnesses to the events.  

One hydrogen bomb was enough to take radioactivity around the world from China to the East Coast of the United States, we can only imagine what 500 or 1,000 would do and wonder what would a radioactive hypercane be able to do as a residual effect of a major nuclear strike on the United States?  It would travel death by the tens of millions and more around the world for one full year before fully dissipating.  That is a goal that globalists someday want, as if the human species would somehow magically evolve by radioactivity rather than get killed, burned, birth defected and maimed by it.  

So personally, despite the Manchurian Compact which exists between Russia and China, where if you nuke one, you are attacking both and BOTH will respond with nukes...something no one is now talking about in the Russia, Russia, Russia (look away from domestic election steal) hype, I ain't worried about it at all.  Russia is led by a man with a clear head on his shoulders, and most likely he already knows it is a political bluster move designed to cast the eyes of a nation and of the entire world AWAY FROM AN OPEN ELECTION STEAL FOR HILLARY.  

For those that read and know the Bible is also history BEFORE it happens, you also should be at least be cognizant that any nuclear holocaust demise of the USA (to be found in Jeremiah 51, Isaiah 13 and various other passages)  still would be years out as well.

Guest Blog : Mac Slavo of SHTFplan.com - United Nations Soldier Says They Will Soon Occupy America: “Going Door-to-Door Taking Guns Or Shooting To Kill”

United Nations Soldier Says They Will Soon Occupy America: “Going Door-to-Door Taking Guns Or Shooting To Kill”

Mac Slavo
October 13th, 2016

We have previously noted that recent allegations of Russian hacking could mean the Department of Homeland Security will be charged with protecting the Presidential election in November. In fact, as Joe Joseph noted in his latest daily news update, the Department of Defense and U.S. military may be joining DHS to ensure a fair electoral process. Coupled with previous reports that “independent” United Nations observers will be overseeing this year’s vote suggests there may be some legitimacy to the shocking claims you are about to read.

Consider what might happen should a particular candidate be elected to the Presidency, only to have the Department of Homeland Security, DoD or United Nations overturn the vote. And when we say “particular candidate” we are, of course, referring to Donald Trump. With well over 50 million Americans supporting him for the Presidency, if he were to win a decisive victory and then have that victory overturned because of national security issues, one can only imagine the outcry, protests and riots to follow.

The narrative has already been created at the very highest levels of America’s political hierarchy and it is not so hard to envision a scenario such as this playing out. 

Should such an event come to pass, would the “transition” be peaceful?
According to a recent alert posted at SteveQuayle.com, the United Nations may already be preparing for such an outcome:

This does not come from a high level source. Just an everyday average Joe. But a guy that works in the same industry, that always gave a hard time about the tin hat-stuff, recently returned from a Great Divide Concert at which a gentleman just passing by, stopped to mingle with this group of
people. They had a couple of drinks, and this guy states, he likes America, he likes the people. He wished he could dance like, the Americans. Laugh.
He states he had been fighting beside US troops over past 6-7 years. And this is why I feel I need to tell someone over here in the states a lil something. He said he was from Norway. And he would be back in 3-4 months as a part of UN troops. He said there was nothing he could do. But felt compelled that he needed to say something, just to let such good people know what is coming. He said that they were going to be going door to door taking guns, or shooting to kill. They already had the lists of names, and addresses.
I have no reason to not believe the words from acquaintance. It actually pretty much freaked him out. He is rather overwhelmed from the conversation.
From his reaction, and as long as we’ve been acquainted, I have no reason not to believe what he was told. I just wanted to pass this on to someone with the means to possibly get the word out.
Source: Quayle Alerts

One of our observant readers from Texas submitted a similar comment recently.

I just heard some really disturbing shit about something going on in Texas down here. I am sorry but I cannot post it. All I can say is that Chinese soldiers have been inching their way closer to all the major cities including Houston, Woodlands, Conroe, and other major cities and our state government knows that we will be under attack between now and the next 3-4 months. A chi-com soldier just threatened someone that I know very well recently and he is not happy about the incident. When chi-coms are telling Americans in my state where they can go from where they can’t go, then we have a BIG PHUCKING PROBLEM. All the military equipment is here in Texas, pre positioned during JADE HELM 15-16 and the soldiers have already been placed in our state and all they have to do is just go out, jump into the UN vehicles and roll out to the major highways, and deploy to neighborhoods. All over 2017 is when the civilians will be getting the worst of it. I know something is up because this link is matching up with what I am hearing.
The UN and Chinese know already in advance that they will be rolling down Hwy 45, Hwy 290, 1960/Hwy 6 from 45 north to deploy to take out these area of subdivision, and one of the biggest major attacks by the UN, and chi-coms will take place between 1960-hwy6-south down to Sugar land. They plan to do the same thing on the Katy Mason rd area, hwy10 area. Good luck when you get to that area.
…We have a very, very serious fucking situation on the horizon.

Now, on its face such claims may sound as if they are coming from the very fringes of the internet. And perhaps they are.
But before you dismiss these claims outright, keep in mind that it has been confirmed United Nations soldiers are actively involved in military training in the United States of America. Moreover, U.N. tank vehicles have been spotted  moving across U.S. highways. The United Nations has even tried to hide the fact that their soldiers and equipment have been deployed to the U.S. as evidenced by the following images showing how they are covering up the logos on their vehicles:

While it’s impossible to know exactly what the United Nations is planning in conjunction with sympathetic U.S. political leaders, we know for a fact that U.N troops are actively operating on our soil and their equipment is already here, laying dormant for whatever orders were to come down the pipeline.
If it turns out that the U.S. Presidential election next month is taken over by the Department of Homeland Security amid claims of a cyber attack on the electoral grid, and is then overturned in favor of Hillary Clinton, then it could well come to pass that United Nations ‘peace keepers’ are activated to quell any disturbance or dissent.


Click here to subscribe: Join over one million monthly readers and receive breaking news, strategies, ideas and commentary.