Staggering: Obama to Cut Nukes by 80%
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I reported on this blog of this fact in December of 2010
http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2010/12/obama-on-behalf-of-russia-suckers.html
and it is not only as bad as as low as 300, it can be as low as having one single nuke, and nothing but a bunch of launchers and nuclear capable vessels which are counted by the Obama Administration and his unilaterally imposed START Treaty as nukes as well.
The OBAMA Start Treaty...Famous last words or "Who wrote this Treaty, a dope smoker?":
http://www.state.gov/documents/organization/140035.pdf
p. 1 reads:
Committed to … the achievement of the historic goal of freeing humanity from the nuclear threat….
Guided by the principle of indivisible security….
p. 2 reads:
Taking into account the positive effect on the world situation of the significant, verifiable reduction in nuclear arsenals at the turn of the 21st century….
Deeply appreciating the contribution of the Republic of Belarus, the Republic of Kazakhstan, and Ukraine to nuclear disarmament and to strengthening international peace and security….
p.3 reads:
Article I
1. Each Party shall reduce and limit its strategic offensive arms in accordance with the provisions of this Treaty and shall carry out the other obligations set forth in this Treaty and its Protocol.
2. Definitions of terms used in this Treaty and its Protocol are provided in Part One of the Protocol.
Article II
1. Each Party shall reduce and limit its ICBMs and ICBM launchers, SLBMs and SLBM launchers, heavy bombers, ICBM warheads, SLBM warheads, and heavy bomber nuclear armaments,
so that seven years after entry into force of this Treaty and thereafter, the aggregate numbers, as counted in accordance with Article I11 of this Treaty, do not exceed:
(a) 700, for deployed ICBMs, deployed SLBMs, and deployed
heavy bombers;
(b) 1550, for warheads on deployed ICBMs, warheads on
deployed SLBMs, and nuclear warheads counted for deployed
heavy bombers;
(c) 800, for deployed and non-deployed ICBM launchers,
deployed and non-deployed SLBM launchers, and deployed and
non-deployed heavy bombers.
P. 4
Article I11
1. For the purposes of counting toward the aggregate limit provided for in subparagraph l(a) of Article I1 of this Treaty:
(a) Each deployed ICBM shall be counted as one.
(b) Each deployed SLBM shall be counted as one.
(c) Each deployed heavy bomber shall be counted as one.
2. For the purposes of counting toward the aggregate limit provided for in subparagraph l(b) of Article I1 of this Treaty:
(a) For ICBMs and SLBMs, the number of warheads shall be the number of reentry vehicles emplaced on deployed ICBMs and on deployed SLBMs.
(b) One nuclear warhead shall be counted for each deployed heavy bomber.
3. For the purposes of counting toward the aggregate limit provided for in subparagraph l(c) of Article I1 of this Treaty:
(a) Each deployed launcher of ICBMs shall be counted as one. [the language without specific clarification, based on 2b above, infers as one nuclear warhead].
(b) Each non-deployed launcher of ICBMs shall be counted as one. [the language without specific clarification based on 2b above, infers as one nuclear warhead].
(c) Each deployed launcher of SLBMs shall be counted as one. [the language without specific clarification based on 2 b above, infers as one nuclear warhead].
(d) Each non-deployed launcher of SLBMs shall be counted as one. [the language without specific clarification, infers as one nuclear warhead].
p. 6
referring to Article III, reads:
6. ICBMs, SLBMs, ICBM launchers, SLBM launchers, and heavy
bombers shall cease to be subject to this Treaty in accordance
with Parts Three and Four of the Protocol to this Treaty.
ICBMs or SLBMs of an existing type shall cease to be subject
to this Treaty if all ICBM or SLBM launchers of a type
intended for such ICBMs or SLBMs have been eliminated or
converted in accordance with Part Three of the Protocol to
this Treaty.
Pay attention to the underlined sentence, because that is all the Russians need to abide by, and nothing else. It is a Primary "escape clause". You disarm, and we have no obligations but to monitor your unilateral disarmament. (Escape Clause 2 is Obama is NOT a US Natural Born Citizen, therefore cannot legally sign a Treaty passed by a Congress and 3/4ths of the States, etc., but why should they challenge a nation wanting to castrate itself?)
In other words, the Russians are given a free hand to interpret this as NOT being subject to limit the “ICBMs, SLBMs, ICBM launchers, SLBM launchers, and heavy Bombers” that were earlier being counted by the Treaty, in order to reduce the US to a combined number of 700 + 100 deployable missiles and delivery systems with a max number of 750 warheads, because the delivery systems themselves (even WITHOUT nuclear warheads) are counted as if they were nuclear warheads by the language of this treaty.
In other words, one nuclear sub and 8 missiles with 3 war heads each counts as 41 under the Treaty: the 8 launchers themselves count as if 8 under launchers and part of the 1550 warheads, and the missile themselves count as 8 of the 700 and are subtracted away from the 1550 allowable warheads as well…these are part of the 8 launchers and their 8 missiles take away from 700 number and leave 684 available; now add the sub as 1, that is part of the 800 number, and you have 683 left for the combined missiles, launchers, and deploying unit. Above that 800 number we have 750 warheads to actually deploy, which in the case of one nuke sub of 8 missiles with 3 warheads each, is 24. Take 24 from 750, and you have 726 left by which you might defend the United States with. So instead of reading 1550 warheads, the Obama Administration will enforce a view of one US Nuclear sub with 8 missiles and 24 warheads as actually equaling 41.
Again, this Treaty emasculates the US nuclear arsenal down UNILATERALLY, while the Russians keep theirs, and if they wish, they might destroy a few non-operable launchers and moth-balled long range bombers. The Treaty by the language of Article 3.6 does not even obligate them to do THAT much.
May I ask, was this very poorly written or intentionally anti-American subterfuge actually part of Obama’s infamous Nuke paper he allegedly wrote when he was allegedly attending (although it has never been proven) Columbia University? ...
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Just a month later, in January 2011, I reported in this blog
http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/01/russia-today-brags-of-new-russian.html
Russia Today brags of New Russian Missile, while US forbidden by Obama START Signature on counter-development
From Russia Today,
http://www.youtube.com/user/RussiaToday
Essentially, it is Stealth poly-shell technology applied directly to the warheads with a new thermal avoidance technology applied to the guidance system in the warhead itself.
Whether this allows for hundreds of multiple target retaskings based altitude, trajectory, etc., on a new warhead guidance system containing either a geo-thermal map reading of what targets have already been obliterated, or can readjust to avoid missiles and jets based on heat detection within a certain range, we just don't know as yet.
The point is, the Russians have taken an old system and upgraded its nuclear warheads to a Stealth technology, while a Usurper to the US Presidency has intentionally tied our diplomatic treaty and US National Security hands to clearly aid and abet any foreign power to have not only a First-Strike capability, but to have an unhindered and minimal retaliatory consequence First-Strike capability.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
And from November of 2011,
http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/11/who-outed-cia-in-lenanon-and-iran-i-say.html
the track record extends to other areas of Intelligence betrayal:
Who outed the CIA in Lebanon and Iran? I say we need to look no further than Leon Panetta and Barack Hussein Obama for the guilty parties most directly involved.
Leon Panetta was Director of CIA from February 13, 2009 – June 30, 2011
Delacy Material examined by Loudon includes:
Cliff Kincaid notes w/ document examples:
PDF.
Panetta had close relations with Communist spies, and smoking gun of his betrayal (i.e., his own Congressional Letterhead letters) demonstrate that Panetta has extremely likely committed on-going Treason to the United States since 1981-1983.
The Administration strongly objects to the following two sections: (1) section 1228 would prohibit the provision to the Russian Federation of a range of missile defense data..."
the print media, as usual, and in this case The Washington Times, under-reported the seriousness of the clearly apparent Communist-Socialist and Shia Muslim Obama Manifesto to Betray the USA:
"The Obama administration is secretly working with Russia to conclude an agreement that many officials fear will limit U.S. missile defenses...
the fact that the limit is contained in the treaty will provide the Russians with political leverage against the United States."
... the provision that the president's team finds so offensive: Section 1228 requires that no funds can be used to provide the Russian Federation with sensitive U.S. missile defense technology."
"Weaken"? By that one word, instead of "destroy", it is obviously apparent that former director Woolsey is unable to grasp the intense internal desires of Obama (as well as the former KGB asset Leon Panetta) to destroy the USA. Both Obama and Panetta are ex-KGB moles.
http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2010/12/obama-on-behalf-of-russia-suckers.html
calls for the UNILATERAL disarmament of the US Missile Defenses, and leaves the Russian Missile Stockpiles intact through a loophole given them in Article 3.6 of that same Treaty. So while we strip down and remove our defenses from the ability to more than retaliate and obliterate for a foreign nuclear ICBM attack, the Russians help Iran with ICBM technology and don't have to reduce their stockpiles by a single nuclear warhead...not a one. They can have both a zero reduction, and build more if they have a mind to, thanks to the Obama 2010 START Treaty @ Article 3.6 legal loop-hole.
(the same registered and known Soviet agent that recruited Communist David Axelrod),
