Welcome! Jesus Christ is my LORD and Savior! Romans 10:9-10,13; John 3:16

[For EU visitors, I do not personally use cookies, but Google or any clickable link (if you choose to click on it) might. This is in compliance with mandatory EU notification]

I am a Natural Born United States Citizen with NO allegiance or citizenship to any nation but my own, and will use this site as a hobby place of sorts to present my own political and religious viewpoints, as a genuine Constitutional Conservative and a genuine Christian Conservative.

Thank you for coming.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Year of our LORD Jesus Christ
2017
-- As of January 20, 2017
A Sigh Of Relief With The Inauguration Of Donald John Trump as President of the United States of America, And Hope For A Prosperous Future For All United States Citizens (we who are a nation called "the melting pot of the world"). We shall be great and exceptionally great again.


Peace and Liberty. Semper Fidelis.









Sunday, January 30, 2011

Thomas Sowell and Basic Economics - an Uncommon Knowledge Interview

Sunday Reflections through the ministry of music and their words


Phil Keaggy sings "Be Thou My Vision"


Abide with Me - Church Choir traditional



Royal Scots Dragoon - Amazing Grace



Celtic Woman - Bach's "Jesu, Joy of Man's Desiring".



Chloe Agnew -  "Someday"


Panis Angelicus


Bread of Angels,                                                         Panis angelicus


made the bread of men;                                             fit panis hominum;

The Bread of heaven                                                 dat panis caelicus

puts an end to all symbols:                                         figuris terminum:

A thing wonderful!                                                    O res mirabilis!

The Lord becomes our food:                                    manducat Dominum


poor, a servant, and humble.                                   pauper, servus, et humilis

Godhead One in Three we beseech thee  Te trina Deitas  unaque poscimus:

That Thou wilt visit us,                                             sic nos tu visita,

as we worship Thee,                                                sicut te colimus

lead us through Thy ways,                                       per tuas semitas

We who wish to reach the light                               duc nos quo tendimus,

in which Thou dwellest.                                          ad lucem quam inhabitas.

Amen.                                                                   Amen.



Saturday, January 29, 2011

Russia Today brags of New Russian Missile, while US forbidden by Obama START Signature on counter-development

[Last edited and updated on January 30, 2011]

A follow-up video to the Obama emasculization of US Nuclear Capabilities or unilateral START Treaty agreement

that the traitor to the United States*
and non-Constitutional (not being a de facto nor a de jure US Natural Born Citizen at birth)**
Usurper of the US presidency signed,
 as I covered at:
http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2010/12/obama-on-behalf-of-russia-suckers.html



From Russia Today,

http://www.youtube.com/user/RussiaToday




Essentially, it is Stealth poly-shell technology applied directly to the warheads with a new thermal avoidance technology applied to the guidance system in the warhead itself. 

Whether this allows for hundreds of multiple target retaskings based altitude, trajectory, etc., on a new warhead guidance system containing either  a geo-thermal map reading of  what targets have already been obliterated, or can readjust to avoid missiles and jets based on heat detection within a certain range, we just don't know as yet. 

The point is, the Russians have taken an old system and upgraded its nuclear warheads to a Stealth technology, while a Usurper to the US Presidency has intentionally tied our diplomatic treaty and US National Security hands to clearly aid and abet any foreign power to have not only a First-Strike capablity, but to have an unhindered and minimal retaliatory consequence First-Strike capability. 

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Foot-notes:
*           Haig v. Agee, 453 U.S. 280 (1981) @ 307
http://supreme.justia.com/us/453/280/case.html
(citing Aptheker v. Sec’y of State, 378 U.S. 500 (1964) @ 509); accord Cole v. Young, 351 U.S. 536(1956) @ 546.

It is "obvious and unarguable" that no governmental interest is more compelling than the security of the Nation. Aptheker v. Secretary of State, 378 U.S. at 378 U. S. 509; accord, Cole v. Young, 351 U. S. 536, 351 U. S. 546 (1956); see Zemel, supra, at 381 U. S. 13-17.

By intentionally signing an agreement to emasculate the US Nuclear Arsenal unilaterally, and to cease developing new technologies in this same arms field, Obama betrayed the National Security Interests of the United States.


**              "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."
Constitution of the United States of America, Article 2, section 1, Clause 5

"The burden of establishing a delegation of power to the United States,
or the prohibition of power to the States,
is upon those making the claim."
[i.e., upon those being President to prove they are Natural Born Citizens and Constituionally eligible.]
Bute v. Illinois, 333 US 640 (1948) @ 653


“The mother's relation is verifiable from the birth itself and is documented by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses to the birth.”  @54

" In the case of the mother, the relation is verifiable from the birth itself. The mother's status is documented in most instances by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses who attest to her having given birth.” @ 62

Nguyen v. INS, 533 US 53 (2001) @ 54,62

See also:
http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/01/obama-confession-and-more-on-non-extant.html

http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/01/obama-has-no-birth-certificate-on-file.html

Friday, January 28, 2011

William Buckley in 1969 and 1998. Col. Prouty, and a few words about Oil

William F. Buckley v. Noam Chomsky

Noam Chomsky was a "dissident" who is also an alleged Communist Subversive and Anarchist (or, aka., a "libertarian socialist" as he likes to call himself...code for "socialist anarchist". That Socialist Anarchist definition is, or can be taken as tantamount to the equivalence of a confession to being a Communist Subversive working at the direction of a foreign power to recruit to disrupt, or to create social and political disruption by theory and argument/debate. However, opinions may vary on that...but probability of it being so, I believe, is the more likely.)



Of a note, is that Noam Chomsky brings up a US Department of State memo in which US involvement with French Indochina was then revealed (in 1969) to date back to 1951. We actually had advisory interests with the French Colonialists that dated back to 1945 after the conquest of the Phillipines, and sent ocean cargo transport ships loaded down with military supplies there from about August of 1945.


In 1998, at Stanford University with "UnCommon Knowledge"




Retired Col. Prouty, the former Black Operations Officer cited as Mr. X in the Olver Stone movie of "JFK"

He correctly states that deep oil is a plentiful abiotic fluid, and that the price adjustments on that fluid are a scam. Even the calling it of fossil fuels and mis-representation of it goes back to 1892 and Norman Rockefellers Propaganda stunt. He was privy to top US Government and US Industry participated insider conferences, and reveals in part what he saw and heard.



As of this moment in 2011, the United States can be oil self-dependant in 10 months from the get-go, any time we want to be.  The Obama Usupation Governance, however, has no interest in America having any energy independence, but would rather leverage the US into a 100% dependency (as his actions in regard to destroying the Gulf of Mexico oil spill has made quite obvious).

For practicality, we need to build 7 more refineries and oil storage locations, and we can sell gas at the price of $1.34 to 1.57 a gallon (including costs, but before taxes) at the current rate of exhange in 20-23 months. The US oil supply at the rate of current consumption stands at a minimum of 230 years, but could more likely be as high as over 800 years. The figure here regards deep oil drilling below 16,000 feet under any surface, and does not include the vast resources still locked in oil shale (rock...which Shell has patented a steam separation cost effective to acceptable matrix profit margins when gas sells at $3.35 to $3.50 per gallon, or about current prices), nor takes into consideration the establishment of oil-dirt importation from Canada, which in 5 years of industry and infrastucture development would also be able to replace all current OTHER foreign oil importation of oil. Costs for conversion and pipelines and depots, currently would be about 3 years of Exxon-Mobil's profits. Even with profit-sharing with Canada, all costs would likely be recouped in less than 8 years.

The incentive is for world reduction in abiotic fluid removal (deep oil drilling) in 120-150 years or less, because as an abiotic fluid, the absence creates shrinkage and compression upon the Earth's crust, likely increasing Earthquake frequency and sometimes intensity.

America needs to plant about 6 billion trees (about 72,000 to 75,000 square miles worth) to off-set all carbon emissions, increase of highway fuel efficiency standards by 10 miles a gallon by 2020, and 20 miles a gallon by 2028. We also need to advance non-nuclear-rod technologies to produce energy. And  also to shore up our existing water resources, and create as many as 300 to 400 coastal desalinization plants   We also need to relegalize home gardening and orchard growing (etc.),  instead of Big Brother over-regulation and usurpation of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.  That positive learning experience is what America's Leadership should have been what they took away from the 1960s and 1970s and applied, or at least encouraged.  That's my input.

Tuesday, January 25, 2011

An Obama confession and more on the non-extant Obama Birth Certificate and that very fraud perpetrated on America


Above is a  fuller copy of the Rush Limbaugh radio segment previously posted.

[Updated last on January 26, 2011...includes friend of Abercrombie, Mike Evans radio interview]

I have noticed that even the Obama defenders most always fail to address the specifics of US Law and US Supreme Court Cases, that even were Obama US Born, that without sole citizenship/allegiance to the United States at birth, it is impossible to be called a US Natural Born Citizen. That means, it now takes 2 US Citizen Parents since the Act of May 24, 1934, rather than just the father only from that day previous to our nations's founding.

On January 21, 2011,
http://www.staradvertiser.com/news/breaking/114401004.html

the Honolulu Star Advertiser posted that Governor Abercrombie gave up on revealing the non-extant Obama Birth Certificate. There apparently is not only is no birth certificate on file, he now hides behind the Law, because besides some hand-written scrawl, all that is left on file is as follows:

"Health Department spokeswoman Janice Okubo again confirmed today that Obama's name is found in its alphabetical list of names of people born in Hawaii, maintained in bound copies available for public view. That information, called index data, shows a listing for "Obama II, Barack Hussein, Male...."

Based on the hand written scrawl, someone later entered the name of "Obama II, Barack Hussein, Male" into the computer data base. Considering it is likely that Obama only has a British Commonwealth of Kenya Birth Certificate, unless he can prove otherwise, it is not surprising. As Rush Limbaugh would say, "BIG WHOOP!"
And even if Obama has a US Certification of Live Birth long form or long form COLB...he, by his biological father, Obama I, the putative President Obama II is still born a Commonwealth Brit.

But now, Jerome Corsi at World Net Daily has revealed a missing link and Obama confession that he himself was born in January of 1961.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=255297
 Corsi refers to Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller of ABC News, Major Garrett of Foxnews -- both reporting on April 17, 2009 -- and that of Howard LaFranchi, Staff writer of the Christian Science Monitor reporting 2 days after the fact on April 19, 2009, that:


http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2009/0419/chummy-obama-chavez-mark-spirit-of-cooperation-at-summit

"…Obama responded disarmingly to an hour-long opening speech by Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega, in which the former leftist revolutionary reviewed US action against Cuba including the failed Bay of Pigs invasion. “I’m grateful President Ortega did not blame me for things that happened when I was three months old,” he told chuckling leaders."

Just so the Liberal and Communist-Socialist scoffers understand the precise day from what they would deem a "reliable source, On January 26, 2011, the John F. Kennedy Presidential Library and Museum
http://www.jfklibrary.org/JFK/JFK-in-History/The-Bay-of-Pigs.aspx
states:
"On April 17, 1961, 1400 Cuban exiles launched what became a botched invasion at the Bay of Pigs on the south coast of Cuba."


3 months prior to this is January 1961.  So Obama let slip that he was born in January of  1961? 

Even if the benefit of a doubt were given the other way, 3 months forward gives us a July of 1961 birthdate confession for Obama.  The reporters of ABC and Fox News tried to excuse the gaffe, but this gaffe is more than just a little off.  Even ABC acknowledges the official Obama birthdate was actually 4 months away, not 3. 
http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/04/president-ob-20.html

Oddly enough, the very news organization that Obama accused was his enemy, Foxnews, did more to try to brush the birthdate issue aside in its wording
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/04/18/obama-endures-ortega-diatribe/
than did ABC News.

It seems that the entire Major Media is playing a game upon America, of pretending they are fair minded, when they obviously have a self-appointed and non-elected agenda that is driven by Leftist politics, fear of FCC shut-downs or of willing conspiracies and cover-ups.

So where was Obama?  I have already previously documented that twice the Kenyan Parliament said he was born in Kenya, and the Eastern Standard of Nairobi headlined that "Kenyan-born Senator Barack Obama" was elected to US Senator in June 2004.  The original "birthers" are those of the Government and Media of Kenya, both years before and after he announced in February of 2007 that he would run.  And it was not until a Democrat was able to circumvent the now (and might as well be labeled as the) American Pravda Mainstream Media, that I incredulously began to look at this issue to dismiss it, and found that I legally could not.  Instead, I found that the "watchdog media" was not only asleep at the switch, but based on a racist agenda, to install a black man, any black man in the White House, as if a Civil Rights jesture and a good deed, the Media refused to vet the man.

 To this day, like the sinner that refuses the sting of conscience in acknowledging his sins against G-D and his fellow man, so too does the Media and others wish the issue to go away, lest they feel shamed...as if that were the sin, rather than their misdeeds and conspiratorial agreement to sweep it away and cover it up, and denigrate and misrepresent the Constitutionalist challenge made by those labeled as "Birthers".  They are incapable of matching wits on the law, the History of the Constitutional wording, the facts...so they do what they can do, they call us names and misrepresent the data.  Is that all they've got?  Apparently so. 
As I have previously posted, the idea of Natural Born Citizenship, if you wish to argue from the non-religious view, goes back as far as Ancient Greece:

Aristotle, The Athenian Constitution, 2.26, (translated by Frederick G. Kenyon)
“…it was resolved, on the motion of Pericles, that no one should admitted to the franchise who was not of citizen birth by both parents. “
http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/athenian_const.2.2.html

Last summer, we read (and some saw the video) where Obama said,
Being an American is not a matter of blood or birth, it’s a matter of faith,” Obama declared...



I guess if you were born in Kenya, and the first eyewitness you had to be in the US was when you were 1 year old in February of 1962, and you had NO Birth Certificate on file from a US Hospital with witnesses to the birth...you would say the same thing, too. 

Barack Obama's Jr.'s first baby-sitter only remembers baby Barry as present in the USA in Washington State from February 1962 onward.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=106258
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=107889

No one can place Obama in the United States any earlier than 1962. If Obama was born in August 4 of 1961...why is it that no one can account for him at all in 1961 in Hawaii or anywhere in the USA in 1961? Why? Unless he was foreign born and allowed to remain outside the US for his first several months perhaps?

It is quite obvious, even from Obama's biography, that what he apparently describes as his aloof white grandparents did not take care of him in his infancy or toddler days. He infers that until he reached age 11, he was essentially Ann's problem. Even Michelle Obama has commented that Barack was raised only by "his single mom".  This callous statement tells us that baby Barack was NOT WELCOME in Hawaii with Stanley and Madelyn Dunham until perhaps after he had reached an age to feed and clothe himself, second or third grade on.

But since Barack was not in Washington State with his Mom in all of 1961's August to December months...where was he? There is no dispute as to Ann Dunham-Obama. The documentation shows that we are to accept that she was enrolled. But where was the baby? 

WND reported:
"...Dunham took two classes: Anthropology 100, beginning on Aug. 19, 1961 and ending on Dec. 11, 1961; and Political Science 201, beginning on Aug. 19, 1961 and ending on Dec. 12, 1961.   ...In the winter term 1962, Dunham took two additional courses: History 478, beginning on Dec. 27, 1961, and ending on March 30, 1962; and Philosophy 120, beginning on Dec. 27, 1961, and ending on March 20, 1962. All four of these classes are listed in the transcript as University of Washington extension courses."

There are no other living witnesses besides Barack's step-grandmother, who says she saw him birthed in Kenya.

and that claim was vetted twice by Kenya's Parliament, one of which was only March of LAST YEAR!!!:

NATIONAL ASSEMBLY
OFFICIAL REPORT
Thursday, 25th March, 2010
The House met at 2.30 p.m.

p. 31 ...2nd paragraph (Mr. Orengo, Ministrer of Lands of the nation of Kenya, speaking):

"...how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the President of America? It is because they did away with exclusion."

Therefore, it seems that Barack was born in Kenya, and reared for at least several months in Kenya (following his birth) as a "son of the soil" there.  But now, with Obama's Bay of Pigs and he was 3 months old confession, that makes him come to the US when he was about a year old...hence NOT a native American, just as Kenya's Parliament said he was not. 

Abercrombie's unfulfillable boast has backfired to fitting more of the pieces together, verifying beyond all reasonable doubt that Obama is a fraud on every level. No US Citizen Father, and now no US Soil birth. What else will fall apart for Obama besides now undeniably obvious "Obama was born in Hawaii mythology?" Will we next have his "I am not a Communist" claims also disintegrate moreso than stated by a lone eyewitnesss John C. Drew who said that while Obama was at Occidental, he openly spouted and vehemently argued for Marxist Communism as the world's political answer (or as Obama would now put it, "our collective salvation")? Is that what's next?

As this story now "birther" and Abercrombie controversy reaches across the Atlantic Ocean,

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1348916/Hawaii-governor-says-Obamas-birth-record-exists-produce-it.html#ixzz1BckShEfz


and around the Globe, it will be getting more and more traction because the concerns are genuine and legally national with international ramification based concerns. And all Abercrombie can say is, that no matter where in the world Obama was born when he was born, he, Abercrombie was there in Hawaii at the time Obama was born.

He, Abercrombie, has no eyewitness testimony...he cannot say he saw or held the baby at anytime in the child's life...he cannot say anything other than at some point he knew Barack's "mum and dad"? Which daddy? Lolo Soetoro the Indonesian Step-father or Barack Sr.? Can Abercrombie pull out any alumni year books, news clippings, datable photos, anything? No...he has nothing but a few carefully parsed words that the KGB calls "propaganda", or what the US Department of State would relabel as "public relations". His attempt to disprove the "birthers" has actually proven the "birthers" correct, because he went on the faith that Fukino told the truth when she says she saw a document. But her alleged second eyewitness NEVER CAME FORWARD WITH FUKINO to perjure themself and put in writing with an oath of affirmation that they also saw any document as well, when they were alleged to have done so with Fukino, did they? Everything appears based on only one lone witness and their Public Relations officer spin based on former Hawaii Department of Health Director Fukino's words. Whereas the "birthers" have merely pursued a quest of the Law and the Facts (something journalists no longer feel relevant if it affects their party ideology or their party members).



That Hawaiian resident and decades long friend of Governor Abercrombie,  and now radio jock on KQRS, out of Minneapolis, Mike Evans stated:

"...Yesterday, talking to Neil's office...there is no Barack Obama birth certificate in Hawaii – absolutely no proof at all that he was born in Hawaii."

"...I asked him [Abercrombie] when do you remember Barack, your first memory," Evans recounted on air.
Abercrombie told Evans his first memories of Obama were when Obama was playing in a T-ball league, around 5 or 6 years old.


"I go, 'What about before that?' and he [Abercrombie] goes, 'Well, I really don't remember him [Obama] much before that,'...." 

The Mike Evans Radio disclosure was posted on this ff. Youtube video and takes about 4 minutes from 1:32 ff,
where the radio jock called Abercrombie his buddy, and "an almost militant"  "Obama lover".


In response to stuff like this, we need to grass-roots on all fronts:
State Legislatures, US Congress, the Courts.

-State Legislatures to pass "eligibility proof to run for US President" legislation, as Arizona is about to pass.

- In Court, any case that gives standing to sue the US Government where Obama is named as any one of the defendants, be it Healthcare or be it one of his appointees like Eric Holder, and the case is used to challenge his authority based on a fraudulent or "fruit of the poisoned tree" analogy.

-In revamping Congress at the House of Representatives, a call for a special prosecutor and Congressional probe into Fraud, with the purpose of Impeachment over the Birth Certificate and inelligibility of Obama issue.

I wrote my US Rep again, calling for a Special Prosecutor and Impeachment probe. Whatever gets legs, that's what we legally and peacefully add the kinectic energy via our rhetoric and support to.

And if all three at the same time, yee-hah , we have a legal and peaceful anti-revolution against those Communists and Anarchists that follow "from the 60s to today" radical subversives.



So where is that Obama birth certificate? Even were the Parliament of Kenya to publicly display it to the world, produce any doctors or nurses or eyewitnesses to the birth, show a snapshot of baby Barack in Kenya in 1961, it would never be enough for those who wish to worship Obama, their deified idol, it seems to me.

In the meantime, the still accredited Hawaii elections official Tim Adams has sworn an affadavit under penalty of perjury on January 20, 2011 (last Thursday as of the time of this posting).

"During the course of my employment, I became aware that many requests were being made to the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division, the Hawaii Office of Elections, and the Hawaii Department of Health from around the country to obtain a copy of then-Senator Barack Obama's long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate."




"Senior officers in the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division told me on multiple occasions that no Hawaii long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Senator Obama in the Hawaii Department of Health,, and there was no record that any such document had ever been on file in the Hawaii Department of Health or any other branch or department of the Hawaii government."


WND also recorded the affirmation to this in a phone interview where Adams recalled:
"My supervisor came and told me, 'Of course, there's no birth certificate. What? You stupid....'"

Saturday, January 22, 2011

1983 and 1984 ex-KGB insights to the current Obama "the Usurper" Administration leaders and allies, Yuri Bezmenov

Overcoming the West by Psychological and Subversive Methods as applied by the Communists via the KGB

Part 1:


Part 2:


Part 3:


Part 4:


Part 5:


Part 6:


Part 7:



On Subverting the Western Media

Part 1:


Part 2:


Part 3:


Part 4:


Part 5:


Part 6:


Part 7:


Part 8:


Part 9:

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Obama has no Birth Certificate on file in Hawaii. Unable to prove even a simple USA birth, according to Governor Abercrombie, a close friend and ally? Birthers right all along...Obama is a Fraud.

[Updated January 21, 2011...Rush Limbaugh radio response on Youtube video added]

Preview:

"No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."
Constitution of the United States of America, Article 2, section 1





" ...the enlightened patriots who framed our Constitution, and the people who adopted it, must be understood to have employed words in their natural sense, and to have intended what they have said. If, from the imperfection of human language, there should be serious doubts respecting the extent of any given power, it is a well settled rule that the objects for which it was given, especially when those objects are expressed in the instrument itself, should have great influence in the construction."

Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U. S. 1 (1824) @ 188-189

“In expounding the Constitution of the United States, every word must have its due force and appropriate meaning, for it is evident from the whole instrument that no word was unnecessarily used or needlessly added. The many discussions which have taken place upon the construction of the Constitution have proved the correctness of this proposition and shown the high talent, the caution, and the foresight of the illustrious men who framed it. Every word appears to have been weighed with the utmost deliberation, and its force and effect to have been fully understood. No word in the instrument, therefore, can be rejected as superfluous or unmeaning, and this principle of construction applies …”
Holmes v. Jennison, 39 U.S. (14 Peters) 540 @ 570-71 (1840)

"The burden of establishing a delegation of power to the United States,
or the prohibition of power to the States,
is upon those making the claim."  
    [i.e., upon those being President to prove they are Natural Born Citizens and Constituionally eligible.]
Bute v. Illinois, 333 US 640 @ 653 (1948)


“The mother's relation is verifiable from the birth itself and is documented by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses to the birth.
" In the case of the mother, the relation is verifiable from the birth itself. The mother's status is documented in most instances by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses who attest to her having given birth.”
Nguyen v. INS, 533 US 53 @ 54,62 (2001)

Therefore the Law states that Obama must provide a genuine Hospital Birth Certificate on demand in order to show he has any right to establish his authority in the office of the US Presidency, and prove that he is a United States Natural Born Citizen, the child of a US Citizen Father as well as a US Citizen mother, AND that he was born on US Soil or US Territorial Sovereignty in order to hold the US Presidency.  In light of that, now please read these links, etc.

http://www.eutimes.net/2011/01/hawaii-governor-cant-find-obama-birth-certificate/


http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=252833

---------------------------------------------------------



Governor Abercrombie, after his prior boasting of how he was going to release the Obama BC last month,  now says that there is only a notation, written down, instead of a birth certificate for Obama.  No kidding.


Last year, in 2010, Hawaii Elections Clerk at Administrator level, Tim Adams, said that there was no Birth Certificate on file when he checked in 2008.


Tim Adams, contracted temporary Chief Elections Clerk in Honolulu during the November 2008 Presidential Election, states that the records of Hawaii SHOWED that Barack Obama was NOT born in Hawaii AND notes also that there were relevant records of interest stolen in or around the time period after this discovery.

Worldnetdaily reported Adams as saying:
"There is no birth certificate," said Tim Adams... "It's like an open secret. There isn't one. Everyone in the government there knows this."
"I was the one overseeing the work of the people doing the balloting."

"In my professional opinion, [Obama] definitely was not born in Hawaii. I can say without a shadow of a doubt that he was not born in Hawaii because there is no legal record of him being born there."

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=165041
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=165981



But that's NOT what Fukino, the former Department of Health Director, adamantly said.


“Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai’i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai’i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”

She followed this above statement up in  July 2009,
““I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawai‛i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaiʻi State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaiʻi and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.”


So what really happened? 

Did Fukino steal the Foreign Birth Certificate of Obama in October or November of 2008?  Did Fukino give the Foreign Birth Certificate back to Obama between October 22-24, 2008?   Or was Dr. Fukino  lying about the everything...the whole issue, and basing her statements on a hand-written note that there used to be a birth certificate of an unknown nationality and location on file, and it is no longer there (or perhaps never was)?    So which of these was it?

For Fukino, "natural-born" can be a play on semantics, and simply means that she is simply saying Obama  was not born by Caesarean section, and he was born "naturally".  No duh.  For her it must have been a joke.  It seems that committing a felony or felonies must have been laughable to her, perhaps?

 She obviously either has no clue as to the legal term, meaning to be born to a US Citizen Father on US Soil pre-May 25, 1934 and to two US Citizen parents May 25, 1934 ff., as Justice Ruth Bader-Ginsberg inferred in her exchange with Attorney Needler in the Oral Arguments of Nguyen v. INS, 533 US 53 in 2001;  or perhaps it may be that Dr. Fukino knowingly lied expecting quid pro quo?   

Governor Lingle in May 2010 placed full confidence in the "word" of an apparent liar, who told then Governor Lingle "Yeah, it's there."...when apparently, the "it", the Obama BC, was not.  http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=151669

Perhaps it is what another blogger posts, a Conspiracy event that transpired between October 22 - 24 ,2008, between Obama and quid pro quo (rewarded) Hawaii officials.   One of whom is now Lt. Governor under Abercrombie.
http://noiri.blogspot.com/2011/01/obama-originally-disqualified-by-hawaii.html

Funny he just happened to forget to tell his boss. 

So it now goes back to Tim Adams being right.



In a 2010 television interview, Hawaii Elections Clerk Tim Adams purposely calls any who oppose Obama as racists, and biased against anyone who is born to one parent from one country and another parent holding citizenship from another country.

To Adams, despite what the US Constitution says, he equivocates that it is wrong and antiquated, because we now have a nation with so many who are born with dual or multi-national liegiances. He cites that someone holding German Citizenship as well as American Citizenship, by example, should be allowed to run for high office here in America. By High Office, he defines that as either the Presidency or the Vice-Presidency.

Adams also claims that Americans should blindly accept and follow the US Government and the Socialists of the  Democratic National Party at its word, because they are here to serve you, and infers that they are effectually pure and flawless servants of the people because only these kinds of individuals wish to serve in Government.

Adams also laments on being pressured when he released the scandalous info, but rather than recant, he felt an obligation to seek to gradually discredit those who question Obama.

To me, the general summary of Adams' main points would be:

1) Adams stands by the statment that Obama was NOT born in Hawaii. That constitutes clear felonious fraud on the part of Obama, but Adams could care less about existing Law.

2) Adams states at one point that the short form COLB could be just as well for a birth outside the US as inside, but assumes the intent of the short form COLB was for issue to US Territory or State births other than Hawaii. He doesn't care about fraud by Obama or his Campaign to the American People.

3) Adams defers that the DNC vetted Obama, and that the process isn't for him to know, simply to accept and obey, whatever they say is so, is so. He then whimperingly prevaricates / lies saying that the same politicians who vetted John McCain also gave the same scrutiny of Obama, when there were no Senate hearings, no intense debates, no presentations of Obama's birth records, no use of lawyers going to Court to justify Obama to run, and no Senate bills issued forth and signed by John McCain to say that Barack Obama was a US NBC.

4) Adams rationalizes that if the Government allows a multi-national candidate with more than one national citizenship to run for President, then at the point the candidate is accepted by the Government or those in charge of the process, that is the law. There is no World Governance or other conspiracy here...accept it and move along.

5) Adams thinks that any opposition to Obama -- if it is not based on race -- is only about Liberal v. Conservatives, and there is no room for discussion. He dismisses any concerns about the Constitution or the Rule of Law. The Law -- if we follow Adams rationalizations -- is whatever the Government or its current officials at the time decides it is: be it after much or even no deliberation on the US Law, or be it on a whim, the spur of the moment, or whatever they can get away with.

In other words, the Law is subject to change at a moment's notice or the sake of convenience to the whims Socialist faction of the Democrats, and the US Constitution is an increasingly irrelevant guide rather than the Law of the land. Adams appears to lean toward or as if considering being  another Obama ideologue  "revolutionary", but one who may have started out and may still be using the information he is tied to, to ambitiously seek being well placed in the Obama Administration and given a lucrative quid pro quo position to shut up.

The term revolutionary and the chameleon nature has been seen in the exposure of Van Jones to America in 2009. Jarrett and Obama since 2004

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnDxzvc0OXk&feature=player_embedded


have personally agreed with and had read Van Jones and his Communist Revolutionary (Oakland, California based) guidebook for "STORM" (Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement) -- Spring 2004, page 64

"We resisted the tendency in the Marxist tradition to lock ourselves narrowly into dogmatism and sectarian divisions. Instead, we drew on different parts of the tradition (e.g., from Marx's own writings, from Third World communism and from Marxist feminism). We found ways to adapt the Marxist traditions to our particular conditions, making it more relevent to our generation."

Therefore, by Jarrett's own words, we can conclude that both she and Obama have been active Communists and/or Communist Radical Revolutionary sympathizers since at least 2004.

Neither Obama nor Jarrett wish to be labeled a particular kind of Communist, because if we were to follow the STORM handbook, they would have to insist that they are citizens of all the world's Communists dictators. Adam's by his blind faithing into Obama and Socialist faction of the DNC, clearly advocates that we all blindly and obediently be the same, and become slaves to those fierce taskmasters who only wish to take everything we got, oppress us, make us slaves...but to then be called as our "servants" in a new Communist "revolutionary" sense of the word...we serve them, or else.

Under the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act, 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii, Section 57, a mailable form could have been signed by Ann Obama at any time during her pregnancy (or forged by her mother or father) to be used for registering her child's birth in Honolulu, no matter where on the planet she bore him; and that same form could have been either hand delivered by her parent(s) living in Hawaii once given a pre-planned phone call and the earliest available State Government open office hours . The timeline of reporting an August 4, 1961 birth by either Stanley or Madelyn Dunham, seems obvious.

But Hawaii statute requires that an actual certificate be on file:
"§338-5 Compulsory registration of births. Within the time prescribed by the department of health, a certificate of every birth shall be substantially completed and filed with the local agent of the department in the district in which the birth occurred, by the administrator or designated representative of the birthing facility, or physician, or midwife, or other legally authorized person in attendance at the birth; or if not so attended, by one of the parents. The birth facility shall make available to the department appropriate medical records for the purpose of monitoring compliance with the provisions of this chapter. [L 1949, c 327, §9; RL 1955, §57-8; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; HRS §338-5; am L 1988, c 149, §1]."



Instead, Governor Abercrombie in late December 2010 to early January 2011, preceded by Tim Allen in 2008, discovered there was NO BIRTH DOCUMENT ON FILE.  Abercrombie reports only a handwritten notation.  So how can Dr. Fukino say there was a magical "interim" original birth document in the file?  It seems that she was doing what she has been accused of all along...lying for Obama.  Since Obama has obviously and apparently Quid Pro Quo paid off John Brennan over the passport thefts at the Department of State, and also Quid Pro Quo paid off Joe Miller with a cushy Federal employee propaganda position after running interference at Factcheck, perhaps Fukino wishes to be assistant Surgeon General and that has been taken seriously as under advisement by the Obama Administration?  Hmmmn?  We have to wait and see wonder about that one.

So what was that the handwitten item that Abercrombie's investigators found?  A handwritten letter saying Barry was born, without any medical record proof?  Was that it?

Any serious and honest (let the chips fall where they may) investigative journalism, I believe, must conclude that Obama's short-for Certification Of Live Birth or COLB is a fake, even if he were born anywhere in the US. But the facts also are that Barack isn't a US "Natural Born" Citizen because of his father's alien national status...not just at the time of birth, but over his entire lifetime, even with the Chester A. Arthur allowance of the father naturalizing to the US by the time Barack Jr. reached age 21. The NBC status and other discussion of relevance, has been previously argued with those who wish to write their own rules and altered concept of law based on their own version of what they think reality is or should be as compared with the Supreme Court laws which need to be discussed and reviewed before the US Supreme Court for clarification in both accuracy and legal interpretation.

Fearing Obama's entire removal from power and entire Admistrative reversal by the Courts, the Leftist Media and Communist sympathetic Pundits would rather go on a hit and run propaganda spree, accusing the Conservatives of all the hypocrisies they themselves regularly practice.

Under International Court, as well as in the US Supreme Court, it can be proven that Barack is a Natural Born Citizen of Kenya under International Law via his Kenyan national father whom never did emigrate or declare legience to any other sovereignty than Kenya. The child's NBC status therefore would be ruled to follow the father for the self-proclaimed "citizen of the world" and POTUS Usurper. But to go to the jurisdiction that Communists and Socialists want to put the Supreme Court under is NOT a sake of convenience on this issue regarding Barack at this time.

 So who is lying? It seems that Fukino was.  The only real question is, in which nation was a birth record merely filed, and in which country was Obama born, and when did Obama really come to America?  December 1961 perhaps?
           Barack Obama's Jr.'s first baby-sitter only remembers baby Barry as present in the USA in Washington State from February 1962 onward.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=106258
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=107889

No one can place Obama in the United States any earlier than 1962.  If Obama was born in August 4 of 1961...why is it that no one can account for him at all in 1961 in Hawaii or anywhere in the USA in 1961? Why?  Unless he was foreign born and allowed to remain outside the US for his first several months perhaps? 

It is quite obvious, even from Obama's biography, that what he apparently describes as his aloof white grandparents did not take care of him in his infancy or toddler days.  He infers that until he reached age 11, he was essentially Ann's problem.  Even Michelle Obama has commented that Barack was raised only by "his single mom" tells us that baby Barack was NOT WELCOME in Hawaii with Stanley and Madelyn Dunham until perhaps after he had reached an age to feed and clothe himself, second or third grade on. 
But since he was not in Washington State with his Mom in all of 1961's August to December months...where was he? 

There are no other living witnesses besides Barack's step-grandmother, who says she saw him birthed in Kenya.
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=107524

and that claim was vetted twice by Kenya's Parliament, one of which was only March of LAST YEAR!!!:

NATIONAL ASSEMBLY

OFFICIAL REPORT

Thursday, 25th March, 2010

The House met at 2.30 p.m.


p. 31 ...2nd paragraph (Mr. Orengo, Ministrer of Lands of the nation of Kenya, speaking):

"...how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the President of America? It is because they did away with exclusion."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29758466/RDRAFT25

Therefore, it seems that Barack was born in Kenya, and reared for at least several months in Kenya (following his birth) as a "son of the soil" there.  Abercrombie's unfulfillable boast has backfired to fitting more of the pieces together, verifying beyond all reasonable doubt that Obama is a fraud on every level.  No US Citizen Father, and now no US Soil birth.   What else will fall apart for Obama besides now undeniably obvious "Obama was born in Hawaii mythology?"  Will we next have his "I am not a Communist" claims also disintegrate moreso than stated by a lone eyewitnesss John C. Drew who said that while Obama was at Occidental, he openly spouted and vehemently argued for Marxist Communism as the world's political answer (or as Obama would now put it, "our collective salvation")?    Is that what's next?

As this story now "birther" and Abercrombie controversy reaches across the Atlantic Ocean,
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1348916/Hawaii-governor-says-Obamas-birth-record-exists-produce-it.html#ixzz1BckShEfz
and around the Globe, it will be getting more and more traction because the concerns are genuine and legally national with international ramification based concerns.  And all Abercrombie can say is, that no matter where in the world Obama was born when he was born, he, Abercrombie was there in Hawaii at the time Obama was born. 

    He, Abercrombie, has no eyewitness testimony...he cannot say he saw or held the baby at anytime in the child's life...he cannot say anything other than at some point he knew Barack's "mum and dad"? Which daddy? Lolo Soetoro the Indonesian Step-father or Barack Sr.? Can Abercrombie pull out any alumni year books, news clippings, datable photos, anything? No...he has nothing but a few carefully parsed words that the KGB calls "propaganda", or what the US Department of State would relabel as "public relations". His attempt to disprove the "birthers" has actually proven the "birthers" correct, because he went on the faith that Fukino told the truth when she says she saw a document. But her alleged second eyewitness NEVER CAME FORWARD WITH FUKINO to perjure themself and put in writing with an oath of affirmation that they also saw any document as well, when they were alleged to have done so with Fukino, did they? Everything appears based on only one lone witness and their Public Relations officer spin based on Fukino's words. Whereas the "birthers" have merely pursued a quest of the Law and the Facts (something journalists no longer feel relevant if it affects their party ideology or their party members).

    So where is that Obama birth certificate? Even were the Parliament of Kenya to publicly display it to the world, produce any doctors or nurses or eyewitnesses to the birth, show a snapshot of baby Barack in Kenya in 1961, it would never be enough for those who wish to worship Obama, their deified idol, it seems to me.


  They might as well be saying openly to one another things like, "Sydrasvoyti, comrade.  Shto nibood vipit?"  (How do you do, friend?  Got a Cigarette?)  or "Nee how, dow shung how?"  ("Hello, how are you?).  But even if they spoke Russian or Mandarin Chinese openly in the DNC, the floor of the House of Representatives or in the US Senate, even if it were to America from the podiums or into the microphones, the majority of the Democratic Party faithful still would be painlessly oblivious.

Updated segment: Rush Limbaugh weighs in on Abercrombie news article, but still is oblivious to US Law on the Natural Born Citizen issue, or that Chiyome Fukino is a woman (as stated in his broadcast, calling her a "him").




 America deserves to find out the truth, and deserves honest answers from Obama, instead of the lies his allies have been caught in while trying to give him "cover".

[Last updated January 21, 2010]

Monday, January 17, 2011

American History Restored: The 13 Presidencies of the Confederacy of the United States of America. John Hancock was our First President?

About 50 men, most of them seated, are in a large meeting room. Most are focused on the five men standing in the center of the room. The tallest of the five is laying a document on a table.
The signers of the Declaration of Independence.  John Hancock is seated on the right, presiding.




Why did John Hancock sign his name so largely on the Declaration of Independence? The answer may surprise you. It was because the Continental Congress called him their "President", and as the President of the Continental Congress at the time the Declaration of Independence was signed, I would argue that the de facto and de jure first President of the United States as a Confederacy, on July 4, 1776, was John Hancock.


There are those who have mislabeled two others as forgotten Presidents of the United States. This is not so. They were Presidents of the Continental Congress prior to the signing of the Declaration of Independence, that legal document by which the US Supreme Court has repeatedly cited as marking the origins of this nation, the United States of America.



The list of negative (non-extant) Presidents:


-3 Peyton Randolph served as the First President of the United Colonies formulated into the Continental Congress from September 5, 1774 at the approximate age of 53 years old, and served a little over a month as President until October 21, 1774. His election was by those of actual members and participants of the First Continental Congress.



-2. Henry Middleton served as the Second President of the United Colonies, in absentia of Peyton Randolph's presence. He was elected by those Colonial State representatives collected into the political body of the Continental Congress. His election in absentia was probably a motivating factor as to why when the Constitution was drafted 13 years later that the office of the Vice-President was required by our Constitution. It went back to the "in absentia" experience that necessitated Middleton to assume the Presidency of the Continental Congress, even if for a much shorter duration than his predecessor. Henry Middleton was stated to be some 57 years old at his election, and served that body as its President for less than a week, from October 22, 1774 until October 26, 1774, to the conclusion of the Continental Congress business for that session.

It may be that those of the Continental Congress did not view Middleton so much as its second President, as much as a President pro tem, and that Peyton Randolph was still in the capacity as being its legal President, even if absent at the time.



-1 . Peyton Randolph was able to resume as the office as President of the Continental Congress when it reconvened. He served again as its President from May 10 to May 24, 1775. Bad health took its toll, and he resigned and died the same year.



0. John Hancock, born January 12, 1737 in Quincy Massachusetts, was at the age of 38 elected the same day that Continental Congress President Randolph felt obligated to resign by incapacitation due to ill health. This "resigning or replacing by incapacitation" consideration would also eventually make its way into the US Constitution. John Hancock assumed the office of President of the Continental Congress (i.e., the United Colonial States) on May 24, 1775 and served as what I call "negative President zero" until July 3, 1776. He would live until October 8, 1793.


The List of the Legislative Presidents:  the Presidents of the Confederacy of the United States of America:

Before I begin, it must be noted that these first de facto and de jure Presidents of the United States were NOT EXECUTIVE positions.  They were equivocal to the Speaker of the House, and absent a US Senate and absent an Executive Branch of Government.   These Presidents must be viewed in that context.  Therefore, the use of Presidents of the Confederacy of the United States, the weak centralized Government being subject to the Articles of Confederation, is accurate.  However, unlike other historians who leave out many of the Presidents of the Confederacy, some citing two or three, some as many as eight, I instead choose to list all of them, including the preceding office: President of the Continental Congress.  While some Presidents of States had their title changed to "Governor",  it was the body politic under the Presidency of the United States that evolved from Colonial to Sovereignty, until its evolving changed required a change to the title that oversaw it from a Legislative Leader to that of an Executive. 

However, even in their weakened Confederate State, these men were, for the purposes of history, non-executive Presidents of the United States, nevertheless.  Again, prior to the the United States as a Republic, and in its formative and transition years, the United States existed as a Confederacy.  It was these kind of weakened (almost "Speaker of the House") Legislative styled and arbitrator role Presidencies that the Southern States had later seemed to advocate in a demand of a return to when they called for a return to a recognition and autonomy of operating more like a "Confederacy" of "free and independent states" as if by contract from the 1776 Declaration of Independence  in the early to mid 1800s...with stronger states and a weakened central Government acting as a benign overseer and arbitrator between the States of such a Confederacy.


1. John Hancock on July 4, 1776, still as President of the Continental Congress, de facto and de jure became President of the United States with the signing of the Declaration of Independence. He signed the Declaration of Independence first in large and bold writing because he was the New President of a New Nation. He also signed in his representation in behalf of Massachusetts, for which representation, he also signed the Articles of Confederation. He continued to serve as the first President of the United States in its body politic as a Confederacy, until October 29, 1777.



2. Henry Laurens, born on March 6, 1724 in Charleston of South Carolina, was a signer of the Articles of Confederation for South Carolina, and served as the second President of the Confederacy of the United States from November 1, 1777 until December 9, 1778. Henry Laurens stepped down to take an ambassadorship to the Netherlands, and was captured by the British while en route. He was imprisoned in the Tower of London until prisoner exchanged weeks after the October 19, 1781 end to the battle of Yorktown (which battle began on September 29, 1781).



3. John Jay, born on December 12, 1745 in New York of New York, became the third President of the Confederacy of the United States of America from December 10, 1777 until September 27, 1779. He neither signed the Declaration of Independence, nor the Articles of Confederation, nor the US Constitution, because he did not serve in that State capacity of representation at the time those documents were signed. However, because of the depth of his influences and participations, he is also a "Founding Father" of this nation, and his time spent as President of the United States, even though a Confederacy at the time, affirms his place as a Founding Father of this nation, the Republic of the United States of America.

After serving as this nation's third de facto and de jure President, John Jay would find himself as ambassador to Spain, the Secretary of State in July of 1784, and finally Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of the (new) Republic of the United States of America in 1789 as appointed by George Washington. In his brief tenure as Chief Justice, among his most notable decisions was that of Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 US 419 (1793)

http://www.oyez.org/cases/1792-1850/1793/1793_0

which is believed to have been the same basis used to grant the United States its 11th Amendment to the US Constitution on State's Rights.
The 11th Amendment was approved by Congress on March 4, 1794 and ratified on February 7, 1795, and reads:
The Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State, or by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.

Although the amendment was challenged, including over that it was not signed by the President --  Hollingsworth v. Virginia, 3 U.S. 3 Dall. 378 (1798) -- the Amendment challenges were rejected by the US Supreme Court.  It reads (in blue):

Syllabus

             The amendment of the Constitution of the United States by which the judicial power of the United States was declared not to extend to any suit commenced or prosecuted by a citizen or citizens of another state or by foreign subjects against a state prevented the exercise of jurisdiction in any case past or future.
         The decision of the court, in the case of Chisholm v. Georgia, 2 U. S. 419, produced a proposition in Congress for amending the Constitution of the United States according to the following terms:
         "The judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law and equity commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by citizens of another state or by citizens or subjects of any foreign state."     

 [Something the illegally appointed (via Obam) DOJ US Attorney General Eric Holder in 2010 has cast to the wind, inviting any Latin American Foreign Power to come in and help him sue Arizona over its Immigration Law.   Even though Arizona's Immigration 2010 Law was simply mirroring the Federal Law on the books, Holder sued and brought in foreign interest representation,  in violation of the 11th Amendment among other egregious disregards to the US Constitution by the Department of "Justice" under the Obama the Usurper Administration.  Again, by inviting Mexico, Venezuela, and other foreign states to weigh in on the case on the Plaintiff side which Holder represents v. Arizona, he is de facto and de jure suing a State on behalf on non-citizen foreigners and subjects of foreign states.  This has already been ruled against by this case decision from 1798.-- Brianroy]

The proposition being now adopted by the constitutional number of states, Lee, Attorney General, submitted this question to the Court whether the amendment did or did not supersede all suits depending, as well as prevent the institution of new suits against any one of the United States by citizens of another state.
Page 3 U. S. 382
The Court, on the day succeeding the argument, delivered an unanimous opinion that the amendment being constitutionally adopted, there could not be exercised any jurisdiction in any case, past or future, in which a state was sued by the citizens of another state or by citizens or subjects of any foreign state.


John Jay retired from public service in 1801, became a President of the American Bible Society, advocated against slavery, and died on May 17, 1829.




4. Samuel Huntington, born on either July 2nd, 5th or 16th of 1731 in Windham, Connecticut. His birth date according to Charles A. Goodrich Lives of the Signers to the Declaration of Independence. New York: William Reed & Co., 1856, was allegedly the 2nd of July, but other biographers have differed on the exact birth date. Samuel Huntington, signer of the Declaration of Independence for Connecticut, served as the fourth President of the Confederacy of the United States from September 28, 1779 until July 9, 1781. Like Peyton Randolph, he was forced to resign due to bad health and incapacitation. Unlike Randolph, Huntington went on to recover, and did not pass away until January 5, 1796.



5. Thomas McKean was born on March 19, 1734 in New-London of Pennsylvania in Chester County, and served as the fifth President of the Confederacy of the United States from July 10 to November 4, 1781. McKean was an avid reader of Latin and Greek classics in their own languages. He died on June 24, 1817. Thomas McKean was a signer of the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation for the State of Delaware.
       Thomas McKean is especially notable for a couple reasons. One is, that while a Delegate for Delaware, he was also an active Colonel in the Militia. He had barely arrived in time for the last argument before the signing of the Declaration of Independence, which he had already made up his mind to sign beforehand...and is the only one to have signed that document while still wearing spurs on his boots. The very next day, he was dispatched with his militia to Perth Amboy, New Jersey, to effect a relief action for George Washington. Not long after, his militia was disbanded, and he ascended to the pinnacle in Delaware public office.
     Of a note, we find that the biographies of the period during the lifetimes of the founders (like Thomas McKean) were sometimes neglectful by omission. In Thomas McKean's letter of September 26, 1796, he writes the ff. to a Mr. Dallas of Pennsylvania:

"Sir,
"Your favour of the 19th instant, respecting the Declaration of Independence, should not have remained so long unanswered, if the duties of my office of chief justice had not engrossed my whole attention, while the court was sitting.


For several years past, I have been taught to think less unfavourably of scepticism than formerly. So many things have been misrepresented, misstated, and erroneously printed, (with seeming authenticity,) under my own eye, as in my opinion' to render those who doubt of every thing, not altogether inexcusable: The publication of the Declaration of Independence, on the 4th of July, 1776, as printed in the second volume of the Journals of Congress, page 241; and also in the acts of most public bodies since, so far as respects the names of the delegates or deputies, who made that Declaration, has led to the above reflection. By the printed publications referred to, it would appear, as if the fifty-five gentlemen, whose names are there printed, and none other, were on that day personally present in congress, and assenting to the Declaration; whereas, the truth is otherwise. The following gentleman were not members of congress on the 4th of July, 1776; namely Matthew Thornton, Benjamin Rush, George Clymer, James Smith, George Taylor, and George Ross.


The five last named were not chosen delegates until the 20th day of the month; the first, not until the 12th day of September following, nor did he take his seat in congress, until the 4th of November, which was four months after. The journals of Congress, (vol. ii. page 277 and 442.) as well as those of the assembly of the state of Pennsylvania, (p. 53.) and of the general assembly of New-Hampshire, establish these facts. Although the six gentleman named had been very active in the American cause, and some of them, to my own knowledge, warmly in favour of independence, previous to the day on which it was declared, yet I personally know that none of them were in congress on that day.


Modesty should not rob any man of his just honour, when by that honour, his modesty cannot be offended. My name is not in the printed journals of congress, as a party to the Declaration of Independence, and this, like an error in the first concoction, has vitiated most of the subsequent publications; and yet the fact is, that I was then a member of congress for the state of Delaware, was personally present in congress, and voted in favour of independence on the 4th of July, 1776, and signed the declaration after it had been engrossed on parchment, where my name, in my own hand writing, still appears. Henry Misner, of the state of New-York, was also in congress, and voted for independence. I do not know how the misstatement in the printed journal has happened. The manuscript public journal has no names annexed to the Declaration of Independence, nor has the secret journal; but it appears by the latter, that on the 19th day of July, 1776, the congress directed that it should be engrossed on parchment, and signed by every member, and that it was so produced on the 2nd of August, and signed. This is interlined in the secret journal, in the hand of Charles Thompson, the secretary. The present secretary of state of the United States, and myself, have lately inspected the journals, and seen this. The journal was first printed by Mr. John Dunlap, in 1778, and probably copes, with the names then signed to it, were printed in August, 1776, and that Mr. Dunlap printed the names from one of them.


I have now, sir, given you a true, though brief, history of this affair; and, as you are engaged in publishing a new edition of the Laws of Pennsylvania, I am obliged to you for affording the favourable opportunity of conveying to you this information, authorizing you to make any use of it you please. "I am," &c. "



6. John Hanson, born in Charles County of Maryland on April 3, 1715, signer of the Articles of Confederation for Maryland, served as the sixth President of the Confederacy of the United States of America from November 5, 1781 to November 3, 1782. He died on November 15, 1783. His family was one of distinction, with nephews who were singularly signers of the Declaration of Independence, and the US Constitution, Governor of Maryland, and a direct military aide to George Washington. After the US Constitution was ratified, one of his grandsons served as a Representative in Congress, and another as a Maryland State Senator. Because his grandfather co-founded New Sweden along the Delaware River, and the aforementioned relations, he was considered among the American alternate version to aristocracy.


7. Elias Boudinot, born on May 2, 1740 in Philadelphia of Pennsylvania, like John Jay, had not signed the Declaration of Independence, the Articles of Confederation, or the US Constitution. He moved to New Jersey and had a law practice in Elizabethtown. He served as the seventh President of the United States of the Confederacy from November 4, 1782, to November 2, 1783. He was a signer of the 1783 Peace Treaty with Great Britain as the representative President of the United States of America.
     Again, like John Jay, Elias Boudinot served as Secretary of State, then titled as the “Secretary of Foreign Affairs". He was a Congressman of the House of Representatives, the first director of the US Mint, and the first admission of advocate to the Bar of the United States Supreme Court. He also served as a trustee at Princeton University.
     Also like John Jay, Boudinot served as President of the American Bible Society, but preceding Jay to that distinction in 1816. Elias wrote a book titled "Star of the West", where he explored the notion of whether it were possible that some of the Indians (Native Americans by designation today) might have been descended from the Lost Tribes of Israel, based on similar customs and primitive archaeological observations. Elias Boudinot died on October 24, 1821.

8. Thomas Mifflin, signer of the US Constitution for Pennsylvania, was born on January 10, 1744 in Philadelphia Pennsylvania, and served as the eighth President of the Confederacy of the United States of America from November 3, 1783 until November 29, 1784. While in Office he accepted the resignation of commission from his old boss, George Washington; and as President, Mifflin also signed the ratification of the Treaty of Paris on January 14, 1784. On behalf of Pennsylvania, Thomas Mifflin was a signer of the US Constitution.
      Mifflin began the Revolutionary War as a Major and an aide to George Washington, who soon after had him appointed to be the Army’s first Quartermaster General, by order of the Continental Congress, on August 14, 1775. He resumed battlefield duties simultaneous with that position, and graduated to Brigadier General. He held various Pennsylvania Public Offices, including that of its President when the titled was transmuted to Governor of the State of Pennsylvania in 1790, and continued as Governor until 1799. He died on January 20, 1800.

9. Richard Henry Lee, signer of the Declaration of Independence and of the Articles of Confederation for the State of Virginia, was born on January 20, 1732 in Westmoreland County, Virginia, and served as the ninth President of the Confederacy of the United States of America from November 30, 1784 to November 22, 1785. After being briefly a Justice of the Peace in 1757, Lee was elected to the Virginia House of Burgesses in 1758, and remained there until 1775; leaving that office because he became a delegate to the Continental Congress in 1775, serving until 1779.
    On June 7, 1776, his resolution stating “that these United Colonies are, and of right ought to be, Free and Independent States” made its way into the Declaration of Independence. And it was later cited by the Southern States for justification of secession from the Union that led to the Civil War of 1861-1865. Lee finished his career in politics as a US Senator for Virginia, serving from March 4, 1789 until October 8, 1792. Lee died on June 19, 1794.


10. John Hancock served a second time, serving this time as the tenth President of the Confederacy of the United States of America from circa November 22, 1785 to June 6, 1786.

11. Nathaniel Gorham, a signer of the US Constitution, was born in Charlestown, Massachusetts on May 27, 1738, and served as the eleventh President of the Confederacy of the United States of America from June 6, 1786 to February 1, 1787. Under his watch, the Confederacy of the United States was almost lost, as Republicans had to quash the demand by those in Congress who took it upon themselves to push the notion that America become a monarchy under foreign royalty: either the brother of Frederick II of Prussia, Prince Henry; or the Scottish Stuart Royal and rebel leader, Prince Charlie. Nathaniel Gorham, though of Massachusetts, also took the same line as Richard Henry Lee, that the individual states ought to be free to plot their own courses as if individual nation-states allied with one another, rather than as a merged and unified singular nation with a strong unifying central government. Concerns about these events were raised by Joseph Story in his “Commentaries on the US Constitution”. 
http://www.lonang.com/exlibris/story/sto-336.htm

In 1833, in Justice Joseph Story's Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States. § 1473

“ It is indispensible too, that the president should be a natural born citizen of the United States; or a citizen at the adoption of the constitution, and for 14 years before his election. This permission of a naturalized citizen [to speak of those to who fought the Revolutionary War] to become President is an exception from the great fundamental policy of all governments, to exclude foreign influence from their executive councils and duties. It was doubtless introduced (for it has now become by lapse of time merely nominal, and will soon become wholly extinct) out of respect to those distinguished revolutionary patriots who were born in a foreign land, and yet had entitled themselves to high honors in their adopted country. A positive exclusion of them from the office would have been unjust to their merits and painful to their sensibilities.

But the general propriety of the exclusion of foreigners, in common cases, will scarcely be doubted by any sound statesman. It cuts off all chances for ambitious foreigners, who might otherwise be intriguing for the office; and interposes a barrier against those corrupt interferences of foreign governments in executive elections, which have inflicted the most serious evils upon the elective monarchies of Europe. Germany, Poland, and even the pontificate of Rome, are sad, but instructive examples of the enduring mischiefs arising from this source.”
See Story’s bio: http://www.constitution.org/js/js_001.htm


Nathaniel Gorham died on June 11, 1796.


12. Arthur St. Clair was born in Thurso, Scotland, on March 23, 1734, and became the twelfth President of the Confederacy of the United States from February 2, 1787 until January 2, 1788. As a Scot, Arthur St. Clair became a British Army officer. While on tour of duty in Boston, Massachusetts, he met and married a well-off Colonial of Boston Society, Phoebe, and resigned his commission as a lieutenant in 1762. He and his wife moved to a 400 acre homestead in Pennsylvania on the money offered as a gift by his father-in-law, the Governor of Massachusetts, Governor Bowdoin. At the outbreak of the Revolution, he was appointed to the rank of Colonel by the continental Congress, and led a regiment, fighting in Canada during 1775, and actions such as Trenton and Princeton, New Jersey in 1776-1777. He faced disgrace when as a brigadier general; he yielded and withdrew from Fort Ticonderoga in the Spring of 1777, letting it fall to the British. In 1785, he was elected to the Congress of the Confederacy for Pennsylvania’s representation. Considering that his appointment to the Presidency on February 2, 1787 followed the debate as to whether to begin a Scottish /Stuart monarchy in America, the appointment of Arthur St. Clair was a curious choice. He would also go on to suffer a massacre of nearly half his 1400 man force in an expedition against the Indians, resign his commission for that loss, become Governor of the Northwest Territories, and was a founder of the city of Cincinnati, Ohio. He was never recompensed for his costs as Governor of the Northwest Territories, and lost most of his land in order to pay his debts. Arthur St. Clair died on August 31, 1818.

It was because of (or primarily because of) St. Clair that the proviso of the Presidential Eligibility Clause WAS INCLUDED INTO THE US CONSTITUTION. 
In 1762 he became married into Massachusetts legience, and at the out break of war, he was 14 years a resident on July 04 of 1776, and a Citizen of Massachusetts.  He is the only one of the Legislative Presidents who was foreign born prior to the Declaration of Independence and before and after the US Constitution, which specific 2.1.5 clause reads:

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.



13. Cyrus Griffin, the thirteenth and last President of the United States of the Confederacy, was born in Farnham, Virginia on July 16, 1749, served as President from January 22, 1788 to March 4, 1789, when the US Constitution was ratified, and George Washington became the first President of the (new) Republic of the United States of America.
     Cyrus Griffin had received his Law Degree at the University of Edinburgh, Scotland, and eloped with the Christina Stewart, the daughter of James Stewart, Earl of Traquair. In 1774, and until at least 1777, Cyrus Griffin was living in Virginia practicing law as an attorney. He was in public office for Virginia and to the Continental Congress from 1778 to 1781, and then assumed the career of a Circuit Judge until his election on January 22, 1788. Following his stepping aside for George Washington, he was appointed a District Judge by George Washington, and remained so until his death. He judicially oversaw the Creek Nation, and also specialized in Maritime Laws, at one point in his career was also overseeing cases of the Admiralty. Cyrus Griffin died on December 14, 1810.

----------------------
So armed with this knowledge, can anyone truly say that after the Founders who were citizens at least 14 years at the time of July 04, 1776, etc, when these passed away, those coming later born with foreign fathers who never naturalized to the USA as its citizens with legience, that these were allowed by the Constitution to be called Natural Born Citizens? Don't forget to cite US Supreme Court Case Law if you should say yes. Not Circuit Court...US Supreme Court Case Decisions. In each one, the father must always be a US Citizen with the child born on US Sovereign Soil to be a Natural Born Citizen in US Supreme Court Case Law.  

Obama says his father was a Kenyan National his entire life and never a US Citizen. That automatically disqualifies him for NOT having sole legience and sole citizenship to the USA at birth, not to mention that he held two other international citizenships from birth to age 23, only the British Commonwealth Citizenship having been known to expire...while Kenya's Parliament infers his Kenyan Citizenship still exists (twice in its records of Parliament).  You might also wish to re-read the emboldened print  I posted on January 12, 2011 of John Locke's Second Treatise of Government Chapter 6 ('Of Paternal Power'): Locke being a major influence on the Founders in regards to the NBC Clause.  .


So what is the moral, besides the history lesson here?  Don't get drunked down by Liberalism...turnaround.





And don't forget, "nothing but the blood of Jesus" will wash away your sins if you wish to become new and born again, (John 3:16; Romans 10:9-10, 13), forsaking and breaking this world's deceptive influences upon your life   It is in Christ Jesus, "In whom we have redemption THROUGH HIS BLOOD, even the forgiveness of sins:"  (Colossians 1:14).  Amen.