[Updated January 21, 2011...Rush Limbaugh radio response on Youtube video added]
Preview:
"No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."
Constitution of the United States of America, Article 2, section 1
" ...the enlightened patriots who framed our Constitution, and the people who adopted it, must be understood to have employed words in their natural sense, and to have intended what they have said. If, from the imperfection of human language, there should be serious doubts respecting the extent of any given power, it is a well settled rule that the objects for which it was given, especially when those objects are expressed in the instrument itself, should have great influence in the construction."
Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U. S. 1 (1824) @ 188-189
“In expounding the Constitution of the United States, every word must have its due force and appropriate meaning, for it is evident from the whole instrument that no word was unnecessarily used or needlessly added. The many discussions which have taken place upon the construction of the Constitution have proved the correctness of this proposition and shown the high talent, the caution, and the foresight of the illustrious men who framed it. Every word appears to have been weighed with the utmost deliberation, and its force and effect to have been fully understood. No word in the instrument, therefore, can be rejected as superfluous or unmeaning, and this principle of construction applies …”
Holmes v. Jennison, 39 U.S. (14 Peters) 540 @ 570-71 (1840)
"The burden of establishing a delegation of power to the United States,
or the prohibition of power to the States,
is upon those making the claim."
[i.e., upon those being President to prove they are Natural Born Citizens and Constituionally eligible.]
Bute v. Illinois, 333 US 640 @ 653 (1948)
“The mother's relation is verifiable from the birth itself and is documented by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses to the birth.”
" In the case of the mother, the relation is verifiable from the birth itself. The mother's status is documented in most instances by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses who attest to her having given birth.”
Nguyen v. INS, 533 US 53 @ 54,62 (2001)
Therefore the Law states that Obama must provide a genuine Hospital Birth Certificate on demand in order to show he has any right to establish his authority in the office of the US Presidency, and prove that he is a United States Natural Born Citizen, the child of a US Citizen Father as well as a US Citizen mother, AND that he was born on US Soil or US Territorial Sovereignty in order to hold the US Presidency. In light of that, now please read these links, etc.
http://www.eutimes.net/2011/01/hawaii-governor-cant-find-obama-birth-certificate/
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=252833
---------------------------------------------------------
Governor Abercrombie, after his prior boasting of how he was going to release the Obama BC last month, now says that there is only a notation, written down, instead of a birth certificate for Obama. No kidding.
Last year, in 2010, Hawaii Elections Clerk at Administrator level, Tim Adams, said that there was no Birth Certificate on file when he checked in 2008.
Tim Adams, contracted temporary Chief Elections Clerk in Honolulu during the November 2008 Presidential Election, states that the records of Hawaii SHOWED that Barack Obama was NOT born in Hawaii AND notes also that there were relevant records of interest stolen in or around the time period after this discovery.
Worldnetdaily reported Adams as saying:
"There is no birth certificate," said Tim Adams... "It's like an open secret. There isn't one. Everyone in the government there knows this."
"I was the one overseeing the work of the people doing the balloting."
"In my professional opinion, [Obama] definitely was not born in Hawaii. I can say without a shadow of a doubt that he was not born in Hawaii because there is no legal record of him being born there."
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=165041
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=165981
But that's NOT what Fukino, the former Department of Health Director, adamantly said.
“Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai’i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai’i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”
She followed this above statement up in July 2009,
““I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawai‛i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaiʻi State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaiʻi and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.”
So what really happened?
Did Fukino steal the Foreign Birth Certificate of Obama in October or November of 2008? Did Fukino give the Foreign Birth Certificate back to Obama between October 22-24, 2008? Or was Dr. Fukino lying about the everything...the whole issue, and basing her statements on a hand-written note that there used to be a birth certificate of an unknown nationality and location on file, and it is no longer there (or perhaps never was)? So which of these was it?
For Fukino, "natural-born" can be a play on semantics, and simply means that she is simply saying Obama was not born by Caesarean section, and he was born "naturally". No duh. For her it must have been a joke. It seems that committing a felony or felonies must have been laughable to her, perhaps?
She obviously either has no clue as to the legal term, meaning to be born to a US Citizen Father on US Soil pre-May 25, 1934 and to two US Citizen parents May 25, 1934 ff., as Justice Ruth Bader-Ginsberg inferred in her exchange with Attorney Needler in the Oral Arguments of Nguyen v. INS, 533 US 53 in 2001; or perhaps it may be that Dr. Fukino knowingly lied expecting quid pro quo?
Funny he just happened to forget to tell his boss.
So it now goes back to Tim Adams being right.
In a 2010 television interview, Hawaii Elections Clerk Tim Adams purposely calls any who oppose Obama as racists, and biased against anyone who is born to one parent from one country and another parent holding citizenship from another country.
To Adams, despite what the US Constitution says, he equivocates that it is wrong and antiquated, because we now have a nation with so many who are born with dual or multi-national liegiances. He cites that someone holding German Citizenship as well as American Citizenship, by example, should be allowed to run for high office here in America. By High Office, he defines that as either the Presidency or the Vice-Presidency.
Adams also claims that Americans should blindly accept and follow the US Government and the Socialists of the Democratic National Party at its word, because they are here to serve you, and infers that they are effectually pure and flawless servants of the people because only these kinds of individuals wish to serve in Government.
Adams also laments on being pressured when he released the scandalous info, but rather than recant, he felt an obligation to seek to gradually discredit those who question Obama.
To me, the general summary of Adams' main points would be:
1) Adams stands by the statment that Obama was NOT born in Hawaii. That constitutes clear felonious fraud on the part of Obama, but Adams could care less about existing Law.
2) Adams states at one point that the short form COLB could be just as well for a birth outside the US as inside, but assumes the intent of the short form COLB was for issue to US Territory or State births other than Hawaii. He doesn't care about fraud by Obama or his Campaign to the American People.
3) Adams defers that the DNC vetted Obama, and that the process isn't for him to know, simply to accept and obey, whatever they say is so, is so. He then whimperingly prevaricates / lies saying that the same politicians who vetted John McCain also gave the same scrutiny of Obama, when there were no Senate hearings, no intense debates, no presentations of Obama's birth records, no use of lawyers going to Court to justify Obama to run, and no Senate bills issued forth and signed by John McCain to say that Barack Obama was a US NBC.
4) Adams rationalizes that if the Government allows a multi-national candidate with more than one national citizenship to run for President, then at the point the candidate is accepted by the Government or those in charge of the process, that is the law. There is no World Governance or other conspiracy here...accept it and move along.
5) Adams thinks that any opposition to Obama -- if it is not based on race -- is only about Liberal v. Conservatives, and there is no room for discussion. He dismisses any concerns about the Constitution or the Rule of Law. The Law -- if we follow Adams rationalizations -- is whatever the Government or its current officials at the time decides it is: be it after much or even no deliberation on the US Law, or be it on a whim, the spur of the moment, or whatever they can get away with.
In other words, the Law is subject to change at a moment's notice or the sake of convenience to the whims Socialist faction of the Democrats, and the US Constitution is an increasingly irrelevant guide rather than the Law of the land. Adams appears to lean toward or as if considering being another Obama ideologue "revolutionary", but one who may have started out and may still be using the information he is tied to, to ambitiously seek being well placed in the Obama Administration and given a lucrative quid pro quo position to shut up.
The term revolutionary and the chameleon nature has been seen in the exposure of Van Jones to America in 2009. Jarrett and Obama since 2004
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnDxzvc0OXk&feature=player_embedded
have personally agreed with and had read Van Jones and his Communist Revolutionary (Oakland, California based) guidebook for "STORM" (Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement) -- Spring 2004, page 64
"We resisted the tendency in the Marxist tradition to lock ourselves narrowly into dogmatism and sectarian divisions. Instead, we drew on different parts of the tradition (e.g., from Marx's own writings, from Third World communism and from Marxist feminism). We found ways to adapt the Marxist traditions to our particular conditions, making it more relevent to our generation."
Therefore, by Jarrett's own words, we can conclude that both she and Obama have been active Communists and/or Communist Radical Revolutionary sympathizers since at least 2004.
Neither Obama nor Jarrett wish to be labeled a particular kind of Communist, because if we were to follow the STORM handbook, they would have to insist that they are citizens of all the world's Communists dictators. Adam's by his blind faithing into Obama and Socialist faction of the DNC, clearly advocates that we all blindly and obediently be the same, and become slaves to those fierce taskmasters who only wish to take everything we got, oppress us, make us slaves...but to then be called as our "servants" in a new Communist "revolutionary" sense of the word...we serve them, or else.
Under the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act, 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii, Section 57, a mailable form could have been signed by Ann Obama at any time during her pregnancy (or forged by her mother or father) to be used for registering her child's birth in Honolulu, no matter where on the planet she bore him; and that same form could have been either hand delivered by her parent(s) living in Hawaii once given a pre-planned phone call and the earliest available State Government open office hours . The timeline of reporting an August 4, 1961 birth by either Stanley or Madelyn Dunham, seems obvious.
But Hawaii statute requires that an actual certificate be on file:
"§338-5 Compulsory registration of births. Within the time prescribed by the department of health, a certificate of every birth shall be substantially completed and filed with the local agent of the department in the district in which the birth occurred, by the administrator or designated representative of the birthing facility, or physician, or midwife, or other legally authorized person in attendance at the birth; or if not so attended, by one of the parents. The birth facility shall make available to the department appropriate medical records for the purpose of monitoring compliance with the provisions of this chapter. [L 1949, c 327, §9; RL 1955, §57-8; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; HRS §338-5; am L 1988, c 149, §1]."
Instead, Governor Abercrombie in late December 2010 to early January 2011, preceded by Tim Allen in 2008, discovered there was NO BIRTH DOCUMENT ON FILE. Abercrombie reports only a handwritten notation. So how can Dr. Fukino say there was a magical "interim" original birth document in the file? It seems that she was doing what she has been accused of all along...lying for Obama. Since Obama has obviously and apparently Quid Pro Quo paid off John Brennan over the passport thefts at the Department of State, and also Quid Pro Quo paid off Joe Miller with a cushy Federal employee propaganda position after running interference at Factcheck, perhaps Fukino wishes to be assistant Surgeon General and that has been taken seriously as under advisement by the Obama Administration? Hmmmn? We have to wait and see wonder about that one.
So what was that the handwitten item that Abercrombie's investigators found? A handwritten letter saying Barry was born, without any medical record proof? Was that it?
Any serious and honest (let the chips fall where they may) investigative journalism, I believe, must conclude that Obama's short-for Certification Of Live Birth or COLB is a fake, even if he were born anywhere in the US. But the facts also are that Barack isn't a US "Natural Born" Citizen because of his father's alien national status...not just at the time of birth, but over his entire lifetime, even with the Chester A. Arthur allowance of the father naturalizing to the US by the time Barack Jr. reached age 21. The NBC status and other discussion of relevance, has been previously argued with those who wish to write their own rules and altered concept of law based on their own version of what they think reality is or should be as compared with the Supreme Court laws which need to be discussed and reviewed before the US Supreme Court for clarification in both accuracy and legal interpretation.
Fearing Obama's entire removal from power and entire Admistrative reversal by the Courts, the Leftist Media and Communist sympathetic Pundits would rather go on a hit and run propaganda spree, accusing the Conservatives of all the hypocrisies they themselves regularly practice.
Under International Court, as well as in the US Supreme Court, it can be proven that Barack is a Natural Born Citizen of Kenya under International Law via his Kenyan national father whom never did emigrate or declare legience to any other sovereignty than Kenya. The child's NBC status therefore would be ruled to follow the father for the self-proclaimed "citizen of the world" and POTUS Usurper. But to go to the jurisdiction that Communists and Socialists want to put the Supreme Court under is NOT a sake of convenience on this issue regarding Barack at this time.
So who is lying? It seems that Fukino was. The only real question is, in which nation was a birth record merely filed, and in which country was Obama born, and when did Obama really come to America? December 1961 perhaps?
Barack Obama's Jr.'s first baby-sitter only remembers baby Barry as present in the USA in Washington State from February 1962 onward.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=106258
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=107889
No one can place Obama in the United States any earlier than 1962. If Obama was born in August 4 of 1961...why is it that no one can account for him at all in 1961 in Hawaii or anywhere in the USA in 1961? Why? Unless he was foreign born and allowed to remain outside the US for his first several months perhaps?
It is quite obvious, even from Obama's biography, that what he apparently describes as his aloof white grandparents did not take care of him in his infancy or toddler days. He infers that until he reached age 11, he was essentially Ann's problem. Even Michelle Obama has commented that Barack was raised only by "his single mom" tells us that baby Barack was NOT WELCOME in Hawaii with Stanley and Madelyn Dunham until perhaps after he had reached an age to feed and clothe himself, second or third grade on.
There are no other living witnesses besides Barack's step-grandmother, who says she saw him birthed in Kenya.
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=107524
and that claim was vetted twice by Kenya's Parliament, one of which was only March of LAST YEAR!!!:
NATIONAL ASSEMBLY
OFFICIAL REPORT
Thursday, 25th March, 2010
The House met at 2.30 p.m.
p. 31 ...2nd paragraph (Mr. Orengo, Ministrer of Lands of the nation of Kenya, speaking):
"...how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the President of America? It is because they did away with exclusion."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29758466/RDRAFT25
Therefore, it seems that Barack was born in Kenya, and reared for at least several months in Kenya (following his birth) as a "son of the soil" there. Abercrombie's unfulfillable boast has backfired to fitting more of the pieces together, verifying beyond all reasonable doubt that Obama is a fraud on every level. No US Citizen Father, and now no US Soil birth. What else will fall apart for Obama besides now undeniably obvious "Obama was born in Hawaii mythology?" Will we next have his "I am not a Communist" claims also disintegrate moreso than stated by a lone eyewitnesss John C. Drew who said that while Obama was at Occidental, he openly spouted and vehemently argued for Marxist Communism as the world's political answer (or as Obama would now put it, "our collective salvation")? Is that what's next?
As this story now "birther" and Abercrombie controversy reaches across the Atlantic Ocean,
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1348916/Hawaii-governor-says-Obamas-birth-record-exists-produce-it.html#ixzz1BckShEfz
He, Abercrombie, has no eyewitness testimony...he cannot say he saw or held the baby at anytime in the child's life...he cannot say anything other than at some point he knew Barack's "mum and dad"? Which daddy? Lolo Soetoro the Indonesian Step-father or Barack Sr.? Can Abercrombie pull out any alumni year books, news clippings, datable photos, anything? No...he has nothing but a few carefully parsed words that the KGB calls "propaganda", or what the US Department of State would relabel as "public relations". His attempt to disprove the "birthers" has actually proven the "birthers" correct, because he went on the faith that Fukino told the truth when she says she saw a document. But her alleged second eyewitness NEVER CAME FORWARD WITH FUKINO to perjure themself and put in writing with an oath of affirmation that they also saw any document as well, when they were alleged to have done so with Fukino, did they? Everything appears based on only one lone witness and their Public Relations officer spin based on Fukino's words. Whereas the "birthers" have merely pursued a quest of the Law and the Facts (something journalists no longer feel relevant if it affects their party ideology or their party members).
So where is that Obama birth certificate? Even were the Parliament of Kenya to publicly display it to the world, produce any doctors or nurses or eyewitnesses to the birth, show a snapshot of baby Barack in Kenya in 1961, it would never be enough for those who wish to worship Obama, their deified idol, it seems to me.
They might as well be saying openly to one another things like, "Sydrasvoyti, comrade. Shto nibood vipit?" (How do you do, friend? Got a Cigarette?) or "Nee how, dow shung how?" ("Hello, how are you?). But even if they spoke Russian or Mandarin Chinese openly in the DNC, the floor of the House of Representatives or in the US Senate, even if it were to America from the podiums or into the microphones, the majority of the Democratic Party faithful still would be painlessly oblivious.
Updated segment: Rush Limbaugh weighs in on Abercrombie news article, but still is oblivious to US Law on the Natural Born Citizen issue, or that Chiyome Fukino is a woman (as stated in his broadcast, calling her a "him").
America deserves to find out the truth, and deserves honest answers from Obama, instead of the lies his allies have been caught in while trying to give him "cover".
[Last updated January 21, 2010]
Preview:
"No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."
Constitution of the United States of America, Article 2, section 1
" ...the enlightened patriots who framed our Constitution, and the people who adopted it, must be understood to have employed words in their natural sense, and to have intended what they have said. If, from the imperfection of human language, there should be serious doubts respecting the extent of any given power, it is a well settled rule that the objects for which it was given, especially when those objects are expressed in the instrument itself, should have great influence in the construction."
Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U. S. 1 (1824) @ 188-189
“In expounding the Constitution of the United States, every word must have its due force and appropriate meaning, for it is evident from the whole instrument that no word was unnecessarily used or needlessly added. The many discussions which have taken place upon the construction of the Constitution have proved the correctness of this proposition and shown the high talent, the caution, and the foresight of the illustrious men who framed it. Every word appears to have been weighed with the utmost deliberation, and its force and effect to have been fully understood. No word in the instrument, therefore, can be rejected as superfluous or unmeaning, and this principle of construction applies …”
Holmes v. Jennison, 39 U.S. (14 Peters) 540 @ 570-71 (1840)
"The burden of establishing a delegation of power to the United States,
or the prohibition of power to the States,
is upon those making the claim."
[i.e., upon those being President to prove they are Natural Born Citizens and Constituionally eligible.]
Bute v. Illinois, 333 US 640 @ 653 (1948)
“The mother's relation is verifiable from the birth itself and is documented by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses to the birth.”
" In the case of the mother, the relation is verifiable from the birth itself. The mother's status is documented in most instances by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses who attest to her having given birth.”
Nguyen v. INS, 533 US 53 @ 54,62 (2001)
Therefore the Law states that Obama must provide a genuine Hospital Birth Certificate on demand in order to show he has any right to establish his authority in the office of the US Presidency, and prove that he is a United States Natural Born Citizen, the child of a US Citizen Father as well as a US Citizen mother, AND that he was born on US Soil or US Territorial Sovereignty in order to hold the US Presidency. In light of that, now please read these links, etc.
http://www.eutimes.net/2011/01/hawaii-governor-cant-find-obama-birth-certificate/
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=252833
---------------------------------------------------------
Governor Abercrombie, after his prior boasting of how he was going to release the Obama BC last month, now says that there is only a notation, written down, instead of a birth certificate for Obama. No kidding.
Last year, in 2010, Hawaii Elections Clerk at Administrator level, Tim Adams, said that there was no Birth Certificate on file when he checked in 2008.
Tim Adams, contracted temporary Chief Elections Clerk in Honolulu during the November 2008 Presidential Election, states that the records of Hawaii SHOWED that Barack Obama was NOT born in Hawaii AND notes also that there were relevant records of interest stolen in or around the time period after this discovery.
Worldnetdaily reported Adams as saying:
"There is no birth certificate," said Tim Adams... "It's like an open secret. There isn't one. Everyone in the government there knows this."
"I was the one overseeing the work of the people doing the balloting."
"In my professional opinion, [Obama] definitely was not born in Hawaii. I can say without a shadow of a doubt that he was not born in Hawaii because there is no legal record of him being born there."
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=165041
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=165981
But that's NOT what Fukino, the former Department of Health Director, adamantly said.
“Therefore, I as Director of Health for the State of Hawai’i, along with the Registrar of Vital Statistics who has statutory authority to oversee and maintain these type of vital records, have personally seen and verified that the Hawai’i State Department of Health has Sen. Obama’s original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.”
She followed this above statement up in July 2009,
““I, Dr. Chiyome Fukino, Director of the Hawai‛i State Department of Health, have seen the original vital records maintained on file by the Hawaiʻi State Department of Health verifying Barack Hussein Obama was born in Hawaiʻi and is a natural-born American citizen. I have nothing further to add to this statement or my original statement issued in October 2008 over eight months ago.”
So what really happened?
Did Fukino steal the Foreign Birth Certificate of Obama in October or November of 2008? Did Fukino give the Foreign Birth Certificate back to Obama between October 22-24, 2008? Or was Dr. Fukino lying about the everything...the whole issue, and basing her statements on a hand-written note that there used to be a birth certificate of an unknown nationality and location on file, and it is no longer there (or perhaps never was)? So which of these was it?
For Fukino, "natural-born" can be a play on semantics, and simply means that she is simply saying Obama was not born by Caesarean section, and he was born "naturally". No duh. For her it must have been a joke. It seems that committing a felony or felonies must have been laughable to her, perhaps?
She obviously either has no clue as to the legal term, meaning to be born to a US Citizen Father on US Soil pre-May 25, 1934 and to two US Citizen parents May 25, 1934 ff., as Justice Ruth Bader-Ginsberg inferred in her exchange with Attorney Needler in the Oral Arguments of Nguyen v. INS, 533 US 53 in 2001; or perhaps it may be that Dr. Fukino knowingly lied expecting quid pro quo?
Governor Lingle in May 2010 placed full confidence in the "word" of an apparent liar, who told then Governor Lingle "Yeah, it's there."...when apparently, the "it", the Obama BC, was not. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=151669
Perhaps it is what another blogger posts, a Conspiracy event that transpired between October 22 - 24 ,2008, between Obama and quid pro quo (rewarded) Hawaii officials. One of whom is now Lt. Governor under Abercrombie.
http://noiri.blogspot.com/2011/01/obama-originally-disqualified-by-hawaii.htmlFunny he just happened to forget to tell his boss.
So it now goes back to Tim Adams being right.
In a 2010 television interview, Hawaii Elections Clerk Tim Adams purposely calls any who oppose Obama as racists, and biased against anyone who is born to one parent from one country and another parent holding citizenship from another country.
To Adams, despite what the US Constitution says, he equivocates that it is wrong and antiquated, because we now have a nation with so many who are born with dual or multi-national liegiances. He cites that someone holding German Citizenship as well as American Citizenship, by example, should be allowed to run for high office here in America. By High Office, he defines that as either the Presidency or the Vice-Presidency.
Adams also claims that Americans should blindly accept and follow the US Government and the Socialists of the Democratic National Party at its word, because they are here to serve you, and infers that they are effectually pure and flawless servants of the people because only these kinds of individuals wish to serve in Government.
Adams also laments on being pressured when he released the scandalous info, but rather than recant, he felt an obligation to seek to gradually discredit those who question Obama.
To me, the general summary of Adams' main points would be:
1) Adams stands by the statment that Obama was NOT born in Hawaii. That constitutes clear felonious fraud on the part of Obama, but Adams could care less about existing Law.
2) Adams states at one point that the short form COLB could be just as well for a birth outside the US as inside, but assumes the intent of the short form COLB was for issue to US Territory or State births other than Hawaii. He doesn't care about fraud by Obama or his Campaign to the American People.
3) Adams defers that the DNC vetted Obama, and that the process isn't for him to know, simply to accept and obey, whatever they say is so, is so. He then whimperingly prevaricates / lies saying that the same politicians who vetted John McCain also gave the same scrutiny of Obama, when there were no Senate hearings, no intense debates, no presentations of Obama's birth records, no use of lawyers going to Court to justify Obama to run, and no Senate bills issued forth and signed by John McCain to say that Barack Obama was a US NBC.
4) Adams rationalizes that if the Government allows a multi-national candidate with more than one national citizenship to run for President, then at the point the candidate is accepted by the Government or those in charge of the process, that is the law. There is no World Governance or other conspiracy here...accept it and move along.
5) Adams thinks that any opposition to Obama -- if it is not based on race -- is only about Liberal v. Conservatives, and there is no room for discussion. He dismisses any concerns about the Constitution or the Rule of Law. The Law -- if we follow Adams rationalizations -- is whatever the Government or its current officials at the time decides it is: be it after much or even no deliberation on the US Law, or be it on a whim, the spur of the moment, or whatever they can get away with.
In other words, the Law is subject to change at a moment's notice or the sake of convenience to the whims Socialist faction of the Democrats, and the US Constitution is an increasingly irrelevant guide rather than the Law of the land. Adams appears to lean toward or as if considering being another Obama ideologue "revolutionary", but one who may have started out and may still be using the information he is tied to, to ambitiously seek being well placed in the Obama Administration and given a lucrative quid pro quo position to shut up.
The term revolutionary and the chameleon nature has been seen in the exposure of Van Jones to America in 2009. Jarrett and Obama since 2004
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TnDxzvc0OXk&feature=player_embedded
have personally agreed with and had read Van Jones and his Communist Revolutionary (Oakland, California based) guidebook for "STORM" (Standing Together to Organize a Revolutionary Movement) -- Spring 2004, page 64
Therefore, by Jarrett's own words, we can conclude that both she and Obama have been active Communists and/or Communist Radical Revolutionary sympathizers since at least 2004.
Neither Obama nor Jarrett wish to be labeled a particular kind of Communist, because if we were to follow the STORM handbook, they would have to insist that they are citizens of all the world's Communists dictators. Adam's by his blind faithing into Obama and Socialist faction of the DNC, clearly advocates that we all blindly and obediently be the same, and become slaves to those fierce taskmasters who only wish to take everything we got, oppress us, make us slaves...but to then be called as our "servants" in a new Communist "revolutionary" sense of the word...we serve them, or else.
Under the Territorial Public Health Statistics Act, 1955 Revised Laws of Hawaii, Section 57, a mailable form could have been signed by Ann Obama at any time during her pregnancy (or forged by her mother or father) to be used for registering her child's birth in Honolulu, no matter where on the planet she bore him; and that same form could have been either hand delivered by her parent(s) living in Hawaii once given a pre-planned phone call and the earliest available State Government open office hours . The timeline of reporting an August 4, 1961 birth by either Stanley or Madelyn Dunham, seems obvious.
But Hawaii statute requires that an actual certificate be on file:
"§338-5 Compulsory registration of births. Within the time prescribed by the department of health, a certificate of every birth shall be substantially completed and filed with the local agent of the department in the district in which the birth occurred, by the administrator or designated representative of the birthing facility, or physician, or midwife, or other legally authorized person in attendance at the birth; or if not so attended, by one of the parents. The birth facility shall make available to the department appropriate medical records for the purpose of monitoring compliance with the provisions of this chapter. [L 1949, c 327, §9; RL 1955, §57-8; am L Sp 1959 2d, c 1, §19; HRS §338-5; am L 1988, c 149, §1]."
Instead, Governor Abercrombie in late December 2010 to early January 2011, preceded by Tim Allen in 2008, discovered there was NO BIRTH DOCUMENT ON FILE. Abercrombie reports only a handwritten notation. So how can Dr. Fukino say there was a magical "interim" original birth document in the file? It seems that she was doing what she has been accused of all along...lying for Obama. Since Obama has obviously and apparently Quid Pro Quo paid off John Brennan over the passport thefts at the Department of State, and also Quid Pro Quo paid off Joe Miller with a cushy Federal employee propaganda position after running interference at Factcheck, perhaps Fukino wishes to be assistant Surgeon General and that has been taken seriously as under advisement by the Obama Administration? Hmmmn? We have to wait and see wonder about that one.
So what was that the handwitten item that Abercrombie's investigators found? A handwritten letter saying Barry was born, without any medical record proof? Was that it?
Any serious and honest (let the chips fall where they may) investigative journalism, I believe, must conclude that Obama's short-for Certification Of Live Birth or COLB is a fake, even if he were born anywhere in the US. But the facts also are that Barack isn't a US "Natural Born" Citizen because of his father's alien national status...not just at the time of birth, but over his entire lifetime, even with the Chester A. Arthur allowance of the father naturalizing to the US by the time Barack Jr. reached age 21. The NBC status and other discussion of relevance, has been previously argued with those who wish to write their own rules and altered concept of law based on their own version of what they think reality is or should be as compared with the Supreme Court laws which need to be discussed and reviewed before the US Supreme Court for clarification in both accuracy and legal interpretation.
Fearing Obama's entire removal from power and entire Admistrative reversal by the Courts, the Leftist Media and Communist sympathetic Pundits would rather go on a hit and run propaganda spree, accusing the Conservatives of all the hypocrisies they themselves regularly practice.
Under International Court, as well as in the US Supreme Court, it can be proven that Barack is a Natural Born Citizen of Kenya under International Law via his Kenyan national father whom never did emigrate or declare legience to any other sovereignty than Kenya. The child's NBC status therefore would be ruled to follow the father for the self-proclaimed "citizen of the world" and POTUS Usurper. But to go to the jurisdiction that Communists and Socialists want to put the Supreme Court under is NOT a sake of convenience on this issue regarding Barack at this time.
So who is lying? It seems that Fukino was. The only real question is, in which nation was a birth record merely filed, and in which country was Obama born, and when did Obama really come to America? December 1961 perhaps?
Barack Obama's Jr.'s first baby-sitter only remembers baby Barry as present in the USA in Washington State from February 1962 onward.
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.printable&pageId=107889
It is quite obvious, even from Obama's biography, that what he apparently describes as his aloof white grandparents did not take care of him in his infancy or toddler days. He infers that until he reached age 11, he was essentially Ann's problem. Even Michelle Obama has commented that Barack was raised only by "his single mom" tells us that baby Barack was NOT WELCOME in Hawaii with Stanley and Madelyn Dunham until perhaps after he had reached an age to feed and clothe himself, second or third grade on.
But since he was not in Washington State with his Mom in all of 1961's August to December months...where was he?
There are no other living witnesses besides Barack's step-grandmother, who says she saw him birthed in Kenya.
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=107524
and that claim was vetted twice by Kenya's Parliament, one of which was only March of LAST YEAR!!!:
NATIONAL ASSEMBLY
OFFICIAL REPORT
Thursday, 25th March, 2010
The House met at 2.30 p.m.
p. 31 ...2nd paragraph (Mr. Orengo, Ministrer of Lands of the nation of Kenya, speaking):
"...how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the President of America? It is because they did away with exclusion."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29758466/RDRAFT25
Therefore, it seems that Barack was born in Kenya, and reared for at least several months in Kenya (following his birth) as a "son of the soil" there. Abercrombie's unfulfillable boast has backfired to fitting more of the pieces together, verifying beyond all reasonable doubt that Obama is a fraud on every level. No US Citizen Father, and now no US Soil birth. What else will fall apart for Obama besides now undeniably obvious "Obama was born in Hawaii mythology?" Will we next have his "I am not a Communist" claims also disintegrate moreso than stated by a lone eyewitnesss John C. Drew who said that while Obama was at Occidental, he openly spouted and vehemently argued for Marxist Communism as the world's political answer (or as Obama would now put it, "our collective salvation")? Is that what's next?
As this story now "birther" and Abercrombie controversy reaches across the Atlantic Ocean,
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1348916/Hawaii-governor-says-Obamas-birth-record-exists-produce-it.html#ixzz1BckShEfz
and around the Globe, it will be getting more and more traction because the concerns are genuine and legally national with international ramification based concerns. And all Abercrombie can say is, that no matter where in the world Obama was born when he was born, he, Abercrombie was there in Hawaii at the time Obama was born.
He, Abercrombie, has no eyewitness testimony...he cannot say he saw or held the baby at anytime in the child's life...he cannot say anything other than at some point he knew Barack's "mum and dad"? Which daddy? Lolo Soetoro the Indonesian Step-father or Barack Sr.? Can Abercrombie pull out any alumni year books, news clippings, datable photos, anything? No...he has nothing but a few carefully parsed words that the KGB calls "propaganda", or what the US Department of State would relabel as "public relations". His attempt to disprove the "birthers" has actually proven the "birthers" correct, because he went on the faith that Fukino told the truth when she says she saw a document. But her alleged second eyewitness NEVER CAME FORWARD WITH FUKINO to perjure themself and put in writing with an oath of affirmation that they also saw any document as well, when they were alleged to have done so with Fukino, did they? Everything appears based on only one lone witness and their Public Relations officer spin based on Fukino's words. Whereas the "birthers" have merely pursued a quest of the Law and the Facts (something journalists no longer feel relevant if it affects their party ideology or their party members).
So where is that Obama birth certificate? Even were the Parliament of Kenya to publicly display it to the world, produce any doctors or nurses or eyewitnesses to the birth, show a snapshot of baby Barack in Kenya in 1961, it would never be enough for those who wish to worship Obama, their deified idol, it seems to me.
They might as well be saying openly to one another things like, "Sydrasvoyti, comrade. Shto nibood vipit?" (How do you do, friend? Got a Cigarette?) or "Nee how, dow shung how?" ("Hello, how are you?). But even if they spoke Russian or Mandarin Chinese openly in the DNC, the floor of the House of Representatives or in the US Senate, even if it were to America from the podiums or into the microphones, the majority of the Democratic Party faithful still would be painlessly oblivious.
Updated segment: Rush Limbaugh weighs in on Abercrombie news article, but still is oblivious to US Law on the Natural Born Citizen issue, or that Chiyome Fukino is a woman (as stated in his broadcast, calling her a "him").
America deserves to find out the truth, and deserves honest answers from Obama, instead of the lies his allies have been caught in while trying to give him "cover".
[Last updated January 21, 2010]
No comments:
Post a Comment