Welcome! Jesus Christ is my LORD and Savior! Romans 10:9-10,13; John 3:16

[For EU visitors, I do not personally use cookies, but Google or any clickable link (if you choose to click on it) might. This is in compliance with mandatory EU notification]

I am a Natural Born United States Citizen with NO allegiance or citizenship to any nation but my own, and will use this site as a hobby place of sorts to present my own political and religious viewpoints, as a genuine Constitutional Conservative and a genuine Christian Conservative.

Thank you for coming.
In the Year of our LORD Jesus Christ
-- As of January 20, 2017
A Sigh Of Relief With The Inauguration Of Donald John Trump as President of the United States of America, And Hope For A Prosperous Future For All United States Citizens (we who are a nation called "the melting pot of the world"). We shall be great and exceptionally great again.

It is likely that the entries to this blog will be less frequent than in years past. I do intend to keep this blog active, and to offer insightful information and/or opinion (and sometimes humor and/or entertainment on occasion) when I do post.

Peace and Liberty. Semper Fidelis.

Sunday, February 28, 2010

Maoist Communism in the Marketplace is labeled "State Capitalism", and this is the language of Soros, and by extention, Obama

George Soros covers for Obama, and laments that Obama did not fully Nationalize / Socialize the Banks in 2009. The notion was he dared to honor the promises of President Bush and Congress and what they had in writing that they could pay the TARP monies back. This is the radicalism of Obama's biggest supporters...to overthrow the Republic, the Free Market System, and tyrannize the USA under Communism by another name: State Capitalism. In effect, it is simply changing the name, with a slight alteration to the same engine of Communism, now equipped with a modern upgrade and turbocharger flywheel of the Market System, that is to be taken over and run and profiteered by the Communist State.

In the interview, Soros psychedilically summarized Obama's one sided partisan hate tactics of 2009 as "Obama wanting to be a great uniter".

In regard to the markets, he states: "Regulators are always behind the curve", therefore "the market should not be regulated."

"When I see a bubble, I buy that bubble, because that's how I make money".

In effect, it sounds to me as if Soros is boasting he has made billions on "insider information" or furtherance by corruption, bribes, or what have you...and fears that if regulators examined his behavior, he would lose his billions and be imprisoned as if another junk bond scandal, etc.

When asked by Fareed Zakaria about the US Markets needing to become more like the Chinese Model, in which Communism was called "State Capitalism" by Fareed, George Soros replied, " Again you, if you want to keep on going, they [the Free Markets] will have to modify their models."

When watching the video, remember to pay attention to the words, and examine them...and understand them in the pro-Communist text and intent that Soros is advocating.

And remember 20th Century history, wherein Communism = Mass Murders + Slavery anytime it takes over, and for decades thereafter.


It is never a peaceful or bloodless transition.

Saturday, February 20, 2010

Obama and the art of deception. Caught lying about a 13 year gap of close associations with ACORN. When you tell lies, SMILE.

{video begins}

Reporter: Senator McCain today said there was voter fraud going on in the battleground states. ACORN has been tampering with America’s most precious right. There has to be a full investigation and he also said you need to disclose your full relationship with ACORN. I’m wondering if you have any reaction to Senator McCain’s charge?

Barack Obama: Well, first of all my relationship with ACORN is pretty straightforward. It’s probably 13 years ago when I was still practicing law, I represented ACORN and my partner in that investigation was the US Justice department in having Illinois implement what was called the motor voter law, to make sure people could go to DMV’s and driver license facilities to get registered. It wasn’t being implemented. That was my relationship and is my relationship to ACORN. There is an ACORN organization in Chicago. They’ve been active. As an elected offiical, I’ve had interactions with them. But, they’re not advising my campaign. We’ve got the best voter registration in politics right now and we don’t need ACORN’s help.


“When I ran project vote, the voter registration drive in Illinois, ACORN was smack dab in the middle of it. Once I was elected there wasn’t a campaign that ACORN worked on down in Springfield that I wasn’t right there with you. Since I have been in the United States Senate I’ve been always a partner with ACORN as well. I’ve been fighting with ACORN, along side ACORN, on issues you care about my entire career.”

{end video}


On the video, Obama references that his only relationship with ACORN "was 13 years ago", with the Motor Voter Law passage.
That association would have allegedly ended in 1993,

if Obama is to be taken at his own word. The LAST Judicial proceeding was in August of 1995,and that staement is according to the State of Illinois at the above link.

In the last 30 plus seconds, you will see Senator Obama talk how he always takes ACORN input and takes unquestioningly, and was still then active with ACORN, and representing them his entire adult life and adult career.

Darrell Issa of the House of Representatives released a pdf. expose' on the monies of the SEIU and ACORN, dated 02/18/2010.

Hat tip: Pamela Gellar of Atlashrugs

The Conservatives honorary "Queen of the blogger-sphere"

Hat tip: Gateway Pundit

Enough with the Democrat, Republican, and unpatriotic Communist-Socialist slanderers of the TEA Party movement

Lately, the Atheists, the Communists, the Socialists, the Liberal Vacuates, the Orwellian Media, and others have attempted to deny the Judeo-Christian roots of this nation and of the existence of anything other than the 21st Century Democrat and Republican Parties as a form of legitimate or rational American consent.

Where is this idiocy coming from? It certainly tells us that these "ambassadors" and "media hacks" of the two main 21st Century Political Parties are not only illiterate of Early US History and Early US Legalism, but they are insidiously dishonest and misrepresented of the historical and legal reality of where we come from and who were are as a nation.


Long before there were the modern or 21st Century political parties of the Democrats and the Republicans, there were the people of the United States of America.

As society and representation evolved, the political parties evolved, and tried also to morph and evolve the US Constitution to their political benefits as well. But in the process, the two political parties of our day – represented by two colors: Blue for Democrats, Red for Republicans – these have forgotten that there are THREE colors to our Flag…they have forgotten that there is also WHITE!

Now in using the Metaphor of colors, it must be declared that there are no "blue" people in the Democratic Party. I say this because there will be those with either very low intelligence quotients or with Alinsky Communist tactics who will try to cite racism in pointing out those who wish to follow the purity of "white" of the Flag. People of every color and creed are found in all three metaphors or colors of the Flag in this example...and all contain loyal Americans in the majority of their ranks.

WHITE is the forgotten color: the color of the common man or woman not affiliated or specifically represented by either the Blue or the Red Parties.

WHITE is for the people. WHITE is especially for those people who uphold the US Constitution in its originalist form, and point us back to our Founding Documents and Heritage. Some of these are Libertarians, some are Independents, and many simply have no party affiliation. And strangely enough, some of these, like myself, are registered as Red (Republicans) or they may be registered as Blue (Democrats)...but they will cross Party lines in voting if they believe that candidate best reflects the Originalist values of the Constitution, as compared to the other candidate offered by their own party.

Hence, the choice of being part of the WHITE of our Flag is a matter of both national character and morality. By example, a Cuban-American like Marco Rubio, a Black man like Lt. Col. Allen West...these, not by their skin color, but by their National Morality and Character to uphold the fidelity and integrity of the US Constitution closer to its Originalism than the Democrats and Republicans of our own day so hold...these men are of the WHITE or Purity of our Flag, for they are of the people who hold this nation closer to that sacred trust left us by our nation's founders.

The Stars of our Flag are WHITE, they are the States and the People, regardless of their skin color, those who exhibit the purity to remind this nation of our Founding Fathers and those Documents that were to guide us as a nation, these people are the WHITE of our flag.

The trouble is, the Blue and the Red, the Democrats and the Republicans (along with their prostitutes in the Media), these have forgotten there is more to what makes up the United States than the two modern parties…and they act as if the American Flag has only room for the Blue and the Red. In fact, where WHITE (or the Originalist Constitutionalism) should have been the predominant theme and representation in both parties…both parties have now acted so exclusive, that they would rather call the Constitutionalists and various grass roots TEA Party movements as “loonies”, “crazies”, “fringe extremists”, and various names by which to discredit ALL those who choose a PURITY of the AMERICAN FLAG experience over their colors of the US Flag in representation.

When the Constitution is clearly violated, be it with electing an illegal candidate, a Foreign Natural Born Citizen at Birth man to the Presidency based on his skin color and some skewed notion of "reparations" to an ethnicity as "social justice", violating Constitutional Article 2.1...or to let him immediately violate 1.6 of the US Constitution...

(1787) U.S. Constitution : Article 1, Section 6 -
2. No Senator or Representative shall, during the time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil office under the authority of the United States, which shall have increased during such time; and no person holding any office under the United States, shall be a member of either House during his continuance in office.

...these Party leaders and the Media have in effected prostituted themselves as surely as a prostitute who performs a sex act, and expects and so receives a quid pro quo. Were we to bring it into the harsh rebuke of  the Old Testament Times, certain organizations and agendas would be the lovers (rather than the nations) with which the Party Leadership commits spiritual harlotry or spiritual adultery with, betraying the very ones they have made their marriage vows of fidelity to.   I accuse all three of so allegorically doing and literally receiving that quid pro quo: be that quid pro quo in legislative pork, personal enrichment in monetary equivalent or in lieu of (in value), interviews and access, or what have you.

The Government OF the People, BY the People, and FOR the People.

Of late, we have had a Government By the People, To the People, and Against / In Spite Of the People. The issue of doing the will of the People, of heeding redress to Congress, of being conscientious to the articles of the Constitution and to not seize powers beyond that which was granted by that document...these have been cast aside, while the most egregious and sinful Congress ever in the history of the Republic has whole-sale robbed the Treasuries to squander monies in the Trillions of dollars, and to NOT account for hundreds of billions of dollars that likely went to political payoffs and the largest Organized Crime rip-off ever perpetrated on any nation or people for all of Human History!

The United States Flag begins as a box of Blue filled with White stars. It is to ever be a Democracy as governed and elected by and through the people of the States, the White Stars (or the States) are to govern in the sea of Democracy.

Then from this foundation, the legislation and processes of all Government and Laws, are to be balanced between the Originalism of the United States Constitution, and the ever evolving needs of the Republic. In each step of the way, the Representation of the people and the governance of the Republic is to strike a fair and equal balance, onward and onward, for as long as the Nation shall exist. Always remembering those rights and privileges which were lost at the 13 Colonies during the 11 years of oppression following the French and Indian Wars…details laid out in the early Constitutions of the 13 States which banded together to first form the United States of America.

The Constitution of Vermont, July 4, 1786 @ 2.12

Constitution of Vermont, July 8, 1777 @ 2.9

Constitution of Pennsylvania - September 28, 1776 @ 2.10

-- reads that every elected Representative of the People should so swear upon taking office, that they
"...do believe in one G-D, the Creator and Governor of the Universe, the rewarder of the good, and punisher of the wicked. And you do acknowledge the scriptures of the Old and New Testament to be given by divine inspiration....

The Constitution of Delaware; September 21, 1776 @ Article 22

" I, A B. do profess faith in G-D the Father, and in Jesus Christ His only Son, and in the Holy Ghost, one G-D, blessed for evermore; and I do acknowledge the holy scriptures of the Old and New Testament to be given by divine inspiration."

The Constitution of South Carolina - March 19, 1778 @38

reads -- That all persons and religious societies who acknowledge that there is one G-D, and a future state of rewards and punishments, and that G-D is publicly to be worshipped, shall be freely tolerated.

The Christian Protestant religion shall be deemed, and is hereby constituted and declared to be, the established religion of this State. That all denominations of Christian Protestants in this State, demeaning themselves peaceably and faithfully, shall enjoy equal religious and civil privileges. To accomplish this desirable purpose without injury to the religious property of those societies of Christians which are by law already incorporated for the purpose of religious worship, and to put it fully into the power of every other society of Christian Protestants, either already formed or hereafter to be formed, to obtain the like incorporation, it is hereby constituted, appointed, and declared that the respective societies of the Church of England that are already formed in this State for the purpose of religious worship shall still continue incorporate and hold the religious property now in their possession. And that whenever fifteen or more male persons, not under twenty-one years of age, professing the Christian Protestant religion, and agreeing to unite themselves In a society for the purposes of religious worship, they shall, (on complying with the terms hereinafter mentioned,) be, and be constituted a church, and be esteemed and regarded in law as of the established religion of the State, and on a petition to the legislature shall be entitled to be incorporated and to enjoy equal privileges.

That every society of Christians so formed shall give themselves a name or denomination by which they shall be called and known in law, and all that associate with them for the purposes of worship shall be esteemed as belonging to the society so called. But that previous to the establishment and incorporation of the respective societies of every denomination as aforesaid, and in order to entitle them thereto, each society so petitioning shall have agreed to and subscribed in a book the following five articles, without which no agreement fir union of men upon presence of religion shall entitle them to be incorporated and esteemed as a church of the established religion of this State:

1st. That there is one eternal God, and a future state of rewards and punishments.

2d. That G-D is publicly to be worshipped.

3d. That the Christian religion is the true religion

4th. That the holy scriptures of the Old and New Testaments are of divine inspiration, and are the rule of faith and practice.

5th. That it is lawful and the duty of every man being thereunto called by those that govern, to bear witness to the truth.

And that every inhabitant of this State, when called to make an appeal to G-D as a witness to truth, shall be permitted to do it in that way which is most agreeable to the dictates of his own conscience. And that the people of this State may forever enjoy the right of electing their own pastors or clergy, and at the same time that the State may have sufficient security for the due discharge of the pastoral office, by those who shall be admitted to be clergymen, no person shall officiate as minister of any established church who shall not have been chosen by a majority of the society to which he shall minister, or by persons appointed by the said majority, to choose and procure a minister for them; nor until the minister so chosen and appointed shall have made and subscribed to the following declaration, over and above the aforesaid five articles, viz: "That he is determined by G-D's grace out of the holy scriptures, to instruct the people committed to his charge, and to teach nothing as required of necessity to eternal salvation but that which he shall be persuaded may be concluded and proved from the scripture; that he will use both public and private admonitions, as well to the sick as to the whole within his cure, as need shall require and occasion shall be given, and that he will be diligent in prayers, and in reading of the same; that he will be diligent to frame and fashion his own self and his family according to the doctrine of Christ, and to make both himself and them, as much as in him lieth, wholesome examples and patterns to the flock of Christ; that he will maintain and set forwards, as much as he can, quietness, peace, and love among all people, and especially among those that are or shall be committed to lids charge. No person shall disturb or molest any religious assembly; nor shall use any reproachful, reviling, or abusive language against any church, that being the certain way of disturbing the peace, and of hindering the conversion of any to the truth, by engaging them in quarrels and animosities, to the hatred of the professors, and that profession which otherwise they might be brought to assent to. To person whatsoever shall speak anything in their religious assembly irreverently or seditiously of the government of this State. No person shall, by law, be obliged to pay towards the maintenance and support of a religious worship that he does not freely join in, or has not voluntarily engaged to support. But the churches, chapels, parsonages, globes, and all other property now belonging to any societies of the Church of England, or any other religious societies, shall remain and be secured to them forever. The poor shall be supported, and elections managed in the accustomed manner, until laws shall be provided to adjust those matters in the most equitable way.


Where is such a demand for a Truly Christian Representation by either the Democrats or the Republicans in Congress? The Public Faith in Government of proclaiming Christianity as the Essential and Moral Character of our Governance has been abandoned for apostasy.

Even the guidance of READING or allowing the reading of bills before votes, has been abandoned as a right of the People, and not just the opposing Political Party.

We look to the Founders for guidance and find this:

The Constitution of Georgia; February 5, 1777

Article 8 . All laws and ordinances shall be three times read, and each reading shall be on different and separate days, except in cases of great necessity and danger; and all laws and ordinances shall be sent to the executive council after the second reading, for their perusal and advice.

Constitution of North Carolina, December 18, 1776http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/nc07.asp

1. That all political power is vested in and derived from the people only.
2. That the people of this State ought to have the sole and exclusive right of regulating the internal government and police thereof.


So I say to the illiterates of the Democrats and the Republicans and the Media, to read the Founding Documents, and stop spreading the lies of apostasy and unbelief. You are not the totality of America. The totality of America in Political Representation in Congress must include all those of us who love and proclaim America via its founding documents and who are its citizens; as well as being inclusive of those of us who love and proclaim G-D through Jesus Christ and are this nation's citizens also. That's my input.

Thursday, February 18, 2010

Marco Rubio and Dick Cheney at C-PAC 2010, and a few thoughts on one of the results of Leftists flying off the handle.

C-Span link: http://www.c-spanarchives.org/program/ID/219778

Full C-Span copy link for Liz Cheney and her father at:

Mr. Cheney remarked: "Barack Obama is a one term...."

I say, let's get him legally and peacefully out of office, so that his time of usurpation is less than that of Gerald Ford's, and less than even Sarah Palin's time as Governor of Alaska.

The primary difference between Obama and Sarah Palin in accomplishments? Sarah not only got everything done she needed to get done, and made the State more profitable and less bureaucratic. In fact, she had so much time left over after governing well, that she could retire early, and sock it back to the Obama worshippers who thought that by frivolusly suing her into ruin, they could "gangsta" destroy her.

Did that tactic work? No. The Bible says that to irrationally attack/despise us Christians for simply having faith in Jesus, is to attack/despise Jesus. And those who attack/despise Jesus, attack/despise G-D the Father by their evil intent. -- cf. Luke 10:16

So what is the fruit of the Leftist Communist "kill the righteous" mentality? Did the peaceful Christian Right suddenly turn violent? No.

Guess what? On February 11, 2010, an Obama worshipper demanded (in his wording) that the Left's minions (as well as Obama) attack and perhaps kill those on the Right,
and a whack-job Obama worshipper did just that in Alabama, killing 3 people.

Where is the condemnation? If it is Police Investigated and proven to be the case, then Roland Martin and CNN ought to be civilly liable for inciting violence that led to the deaths of 3 people in Huntsville, Alabama. Further, Roland Martin, at the very least, needs to be fired and banned from having any Press credentials for the next 5 years by Court Order. He shouted to incite rioting, maiming, and mayhem...and he may also be criminally cupable if it is shown that the Alabama Obama-worshipper read his CNN article before killing three colleagues.

The Left sees no sin in Leftists killing: be the victims US Army recruiters, people or animals killed by arson by terrorists associated with ELF, a Muslim psychiatrist mass-murdering in Texas, or what have you. That definition of justification falls under the Legal Definition of "insanity". In other words, too many of the Communist-Socialists and extreme Left activists are legally "nuts".

Without G-D and Jesus Christ, man loses moral clarity until whatever he views as right in his own eyes becomes an endless standard of self and community contradictions.

It is also almost always "Media" excused and swept under the rug, and therefafter almost never condemned. The Leftist Media eventually makes "those radicals on the Right" either responsible or non-victims. Hence, MSNBC promotes those commentators who rationality also enters the Legal Definition of "insanity", apparently unable to truly distinguish between "right and wrong", "legal and illegal" when it comes to "murder"...using a sliding scale that depends on whom the victim is.

Just like with excusing Muslims for killing non-Muslims in Jihad, there is often no condemnation if the victim is specifically a Right Wing Conservative or a Christian, but sometimes open justification, even praise, for the act.

In fact, a Foxnews exclusive reporter on 02/18/2010 told Martha McCallum that the Gitmo terrorists that Saudi Arabia have received for rehabilitation are all given a new job, a house, a new wife, and $$ to agree that the only time Jihad is justified, is when the King of Saudi Arabia, [the keeper of the two alleged holy mosques of all Islam,] and only when the King of Saudi Arabia says it is acceptable to do so.

Does that mean that the Royal Family of Saudi Arabia now intends to have one of their own as the coming 12th Imam? So the reasonable answer would be: "First they sponsor the majority of those who attacked us on 9-11, then...." Hmmmn.

Wednesday, February 17, 2010

Be active, informed, and be prepared.

Obama picks radical Islamofascist as his envoy to Muslims. Anyone bother to wonder why? Because that one's view IS Obama's view.


Hussain, received his master's degree from Harvard University, and was in Yale Law School just 4 years ago when he zealously voiced his siding with convicted Florida Jihadi Sami Al-Arian.

Hussain graduated with his J.D. from Yale in the class of 2008...that's only two years ago..

and yet, he was nominated on or about January 28, 2009! That's about 7 months after graduation, being coat-tailed into the White House, and later assisting in the Obama Cairo Spech event, when Obama gave a pro-Jihad announcement that he was in office to help the Mahdi, the 12th Imam, who will destroy the world and wash it in blod for Shia Islam ...he, Barack Obama, will be as the jack-ass that assisted the prophet Mohammed (de facto fables Shiites like Obama accept as reality), and so will assist the 12th Imam be empowered to the heavenly heights.

For the past decade, Rashad Hussain has shown the patern that supports this, being an activist with the Muslim Brotherhood of America and other groups, advocating heroes to them as Palestinian incitor to Jihad, Sami Al-Arian, who was convicted as guilty of felonious receiving of funds for the promotion and carrying out of terrorist acts.
http://www.investigativeproject.org/cases.php (see US v. al-Arian)

Yeah...in regard to the Obama Cairo Speech 2009, Rashad Hussain apparently helped promote a new Jihadi mentor, and the clandestine Obama Jihadi teachings (not all that unlike Sami Al-Arian's) in Cairo and among the Muslin clerics he met there, too.

So what is Jihadi intent in regard to action from within the US Government? In Great Britain, they are on video record that they intend on fully taking over Parliament and the nation of Great Britain for "Islam".

More Islam info:

History from the 1940s will yet be repeated again, and the danger is…will we also see the US join the ranks of those in History as no different than Nazi Germany and backward Muslims, and one day ourselves see and commit a great genocide as did the over 10 million Jews and Armenian Christians combined in the 20th Century?



Any of us who are Christians, as well as the Jews, are on the Muslims wish-list for the Death Camps, if they ever come into being in any nation that such a program might spring up in. And yes, we are not "exempt" in our lifetime. 9/11 taught us that lesson.

The reality is, the systematic destruction of the Jews by the Nazis was preceded by the systematic destruction of Armenian Christians of some 1-3 million men, women, children, and babies by the Muslims, even though Muslims may now claim the numbers were 10x less at "only 100,000 – 300,000", as if that makes it "all better". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Armenian_Genocide

Eventually even those numbers will disappear, and claims will be made that "it never happened". In spite of Islamo-jihadi propaganda, Armenian descendants, including those coming to America in the last decade or so, have declared (including to me) that the Armenian holocaust numbers by the Muslims to have been as high as 4 million. I think one figure may have been as high as 6 million, but I cannot recall the context of that use. The number of 3-4 million dead was passed down and grilled into the Christian Armenian psyche by the grand-parents who lived through the event, as I recall. Note the 1915 Armenian systematic annihilation map shows it was de facto the blueprint of the Nazis in the 1930s-40s imitating the Muslims and Turks of 1915.

So THIS is the kind of representative that Obama appoints as "his ambassodor to the Clerics of Islam". Uh, huh.


In August 2008, Rashad (of India ethnic descent) was serving as a law clerk "for Damon J. Keith on the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit". Just 5 months later, Obama pushed his name forth into his Administration.

Along with that appointment, is the likely Internet scrubbing of what Rashad Hussain has said in publication, not unlike this below example http://www.cybercastnewsservice.org/cns/webuploads/OICenvoy3.pdf
of what he stated in November 2004 in the presence of Sami Al-Arian's daughter at a CHICAGO event. Note that location: CHICAGO.

And note also, that the 2004 article, upon investigation, appears to have been tampered with on February 5, 2009...after Rashad Hussain's White House nomination.

The Obama Orwellian “newspeak” scrubbers have successfully purged various records from existence to as late as January 20, 2009; even removing Bush Administration entries, and biographies.
So why not clean up Rashad Hussain's past (on the Internet at least, and up to that point in time, why not clean his past up also)?

Question: November 2004, the Chicago event that Radhad Hussain spoke at --
Did Obama or Valerie Jarrett attend this event and become aware of Rashad only then? Or is there another pattern we should look for?


The 2009 Obama Ramadan dinner guest list as released by the White House:

Secretary Robert Gates, Department of Defense
Attorney General Eric Holder, Department of Justice
Secretary Kathleen Sebelius, Health and Human Services

Deputy Secretary Dennis Hightower, Department of Commerce
Deputy Secretary Adam Miller, Department of Education

Congressman Andre Carson (Indiana 7th)
Congressman John Conyers (Michigan 14th)
Congressman Keith Ellison (Minnesota 5th)
Congressman Rush Holt (New Jersey 12th)
Senator Richard Lugar (R-IN)

Ambassador Prince Zeid Ra'ad Zeid Al Hussein, Jordan
Ambassador Adel A.M. Al-Jubeir, Saudi Arabia
Ambassador Husain Haqqani, Pakistan
Ambassador Erlan A. Idrissov, Kazakhstan
Ambassador His Excellency Said Tayeb Jawad, Afghanistan
Ambassador Aziz Mekouar, Morocco
Ambassador Peter N.R.O. Ogego, Kenya
Ambassador Roble Olhaye, D'jibouti
Ambassador Michael Oren, Israel
Ambassador Sudjadnan Parnohadiningrat, Indonesia
Ambassador Klaus Scharioth, Germany
Ambassador Meera Shankar, India
Ambassador Nabi Sensoy, Turkey
Ambassador Sir Nigel Elton Sheinwald, United Kingdom
Ambassador Sameh Hassan Shoukry, Egypt
Ambassador Samir Shakir Mahmood Sumaida'ie, Iraq
Ambassador Pierre Nicolas Vimont, France
Chargé d'Affaires Sheikh Mohammed Belal, Bangladesh
Chargé d'Affaires Ilango Karuppanan, Malaysia
Chargé d'Affaires Mohamed O Maiga,
Chargé d'Affaires Angela Oi Foong Shim, Brunei
Chargé d'Affaires Baba Gana Wakil, Nigeria
Mr. Maen Areikat, Chief of Mission, PLO

Ms. Bilquis Abdul-Qaadir, University of Memphis
Professor Azizah Al-Hibri, University of Richmond School of Law
Ms. Reema Ali, Karamah: Muslim Women Lawyers for Human Rights
Mr. Hasan Chandoo, Oppenheimer & Co.
Rabbi Nathan Diament, Director, Institute for Public Affairs, Orthodox Union
Imam Plemon El-Amin, Atlanta Masjid al-Islam
Mr. Wahid Hamid, PepsiCo
Ms. Dina Hammad
Mr. Lutfi Hassan
Ms. Nashala Hearn
Ms. Rosalind Hearn
Imam Yahya Hendi, Chaplain, Georgetown University
Pastor Joel Hunter, Northland Church*
Mr. Nooman Husain
Mr. Imad Hussain
Mr. Sanford Ibrahim, CEO, Radian Group
Mr. Jameel Jaffer, Staff Attorney, ACLU
Mrs. Elsheba Khan
Dr. Mansur Khan, UMMA Community Clinic
Ms. Farhana Khera, Muslim Advocates
Lt. Commander Abuhena Saifulislam, U.S. Marine Corps
Mr. Kareem Salama
Imam Yusuf Saleem, Masjid Muhammad
Dr. Ingrid Mattson, President, Islamic Society of North America
Mr. Farooq Mitha
Ms. Dalia Mogahed, Director, Gallup Center for Muslim Studies*
Ms. Hutham Olayan, Olayan America Corp.
Mr. Eboo Patel, Interfaith Youth Corps*
Imam Yusuf Saleem, Masjid Muhammad
Rabbi David Saperstein, Religious Action Center for Reform Judaism*
Ms. Mina Trudeau, Executive Director, El Fatiha Foundation
Mr. J. Saleh Williams, Congressional Muslim Staffers Association
Mr. Mohamed Zakariya, Zakariya Calligraphy

Three names immediately stand out, being part of Sunday 02/14/2010's posting.

* Imad Hussain: Freshman @ Occidental College room-mate with Obama.

* Mohammed Hasan Chandoo: wealthy Pakistani Sophmore year rom-mate with Obama @ Occidental College, and host to Obama's visit to Pakistan in January 1981.

* Wahid Hamid: another wealthy Pakistani who accompanied Obama and Chandoo to Pakistan. This was Obama's second Muslim handler.

Chandoo and Hamid -- based on Obama's and Obama's 2008 campaign (prior) testimony and admissions -- clearly appear to have introduced Barack Obama Jr. to Jihadi precepts of Shia Islam in a trip to Hyderabad, India.

In retrospect, even though Rashid Hussain is claimed to be of "India" ethnic descent, born in America, while Imad Hussain is claimed to be Pakistani...the fact is, we don't know if or not there was any relation betwen the two besides their having the same last names. Washington Journalism is again asleep at the switch.

When we consider the reasoning behind why a major executive politician would hand out a major prestige (and in effect, DIPLOMATICALLY SENSITIVE) post to a very junior and unseasoned Jihadi minded (i.e., 'kill all unbelievers of Islam, and those who do so or advocate so are always innocent') designate, two questions immediately crop up: was it for favors involving nepotism and political payoffs; and, or was the appointment based on a merit system involving chiefly the promotion of the zeal of the executive's (i.e., the politician's) own personal ideology. In either instance, in my view, the appointment of Rashad Hussain is telling of Obama's personal Muslim beliefs and/or corruption as a politician.

Are people really so ignorant about Islam? You bet! So here are two videos to help those who would rather at least "begin to know", and motivate them to realize that Islam is NOT a "religion of Peace", but of the worst fraud and hypocrisy when that claim is said with a straight face. By the Quran's own verses, it is an abomination. But Obama views it as one of many roads to heaven, contrary to the words of Jesus in John 14:6, et al. passages.

Rashad Hussain promoted the innocence of the Jihadi Islamo-terrorist sympathetic zealots, regardless of their guilt. Therefore, as representative of Barack Obama...it seems to me that Obama has made it clear that this is HIS POSITION AND BELIEF SYSTEM as well.

Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Resolving the apparent Barack Obama Jr. 1959 airlift fib about Barack Obama Sr. being on it


World Net Daily is apparently breaking another Barack Obama Jr. fabrication, this time made by Obama in January 2008 at the American University in Selma, Alabama by more documentation. This time, it refers to Barack Obama Sr. as being part of the 81 students John F. Kennedy et al. Airlift of September 09, 1959.

The first problems arose in a Sunday, March 30, 2008 Washington Post article in which it was fact checked that "contrary to Obama's claims", the first JFK airlift was in July 1960, and the second in September 1960...but Barack Sr. was not on either aircraft.

Said Obama, "...the Kennedys decided 'we're going to do an airlift.' 'We're going to go to Africa and start bringing young Africans over to this country and give them scholarships to study so they can learn what a wonderful country America is.' This young man named Barack Obama got one of those tickets and came over to this country. He met this woman whose great-great-great-great-grandfather had owned slaves. . . . So they got together and Barack Obama Jr. was born."

When questioned about the discrepancy in March 2008, Obama spokesman Bill Burton essentially said, oops, and that the Kennedy airlift indeed "started 48 years ago, not 49 years ago as Obama has mistakenly suggested in the past."

In fact, the true story seems to be, on the same page that Odinga is shown to be as if a royal or tribally aristocratic family of Kenya entertaining Malcom X in 1964, that at the send-off party in 1959, Barack Obama's grand-father -- Hussein Onyango Obama -- was a well loved chief cook who prepared the send-off meal for the 81 students (on behalf of Oginga Odinga and Kenya).

The EAST AFRICAN reports that Obama Sr. allegedly left to attend the University of Hawaii prior to any airlifts.

Tom Shachtman, claimed that Obama Sr. came on the 1959 airlift, and was funded...but was "routed a different way". Though interviewed and e-mailed confirmed to that testimony by James H. Meriwether professor of history at California State University Channel Islands, on 08/19/2008, there has been no documentary proof to support that claim, even though Shachtman claims such a possession, it appears he meant that was what he wrote in his notes...not that he holds actual stolen or even xeroxed documents. The "possession" in footnote 25 of Meriwether's article refers to a printed copy of Shachtman's e-mail to Meriwether, apparently.

Gordon Hagberg helped arrange scholarships and air travel monies to the students of the Kenyan Airlift, but since Barack Obama Sr. was not part of the airlifts...any of them...it is likely he was funded directly by the tribally aristocratic Odinga family.

And since Barack Obama is related to the Odinga Family via his "daily Koran reading" (hence Muslim) grandfather, Hussein Onyango Obama: it makes sense that Obama Sr. was likely funded directly by the tribal leader Oginga Odinga.

So, getting back to even the list of 81 in the airlift of 1959 from Kenya, which Obama Sr. was supposed to be on...he just isn't there.


The photocopied document on file lists an alphabetical order index of students from Kenya in the airlift.


It reads:

NJOROGE, Raphael
Jarvis Christian College
Hawkins, Texas

OCHIENG, Adonijah
St. Mary's University
Halifax, Canada

It is the letters of last names beginning with NJ followed by an OC for the next name on the list.

So who sent and financed Barack Obama Sr.? Most likely, Oginga Odinga, a prominent Kenyan leader of the period, and perhaps of the second cousin family to Barack Obama Sr.

There's nothing wrong with FAMILY financing a college education of one of their hopeful members by sending them to America for that purpose. In this regard, I am just trying to help set the record straight.

Lowy Institute experts highlight China as emerging economic savior and world powerhouse to be looked to that the world economy might be saved?

released by http://www.lowyinstitute.org/

and also published in

The Weekend Australian,
Australian Inquirer section,
13 February 2010, P. 2

"China is key to recovery, having deftly managed the necessary macroeconomic adjustment, and the emerging engine of longrun global economic prosperity. Yet Beijing faces the immediate problem of dealing with severe domestic and international imbalances that could derail the economy.

...China is moving forward with genuine measures to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. To make these policies part of a global cooperative framework
[the New World Order]* they need to be converted into a measure of effective carbon price equivalence."
-- Warwick McKibbin of the Lowy Institute

"In this year of the tiger and beyond we may see China lead a revival ... with no shortage of willing followers."
-- Malcolm Cook

"Beijing now seeks to shape the agenda in the UN Security Council chamber and the global media...."
-- Michael Fullilove

"China is the single biggest exporter of goods to the Middle East, while the Middle East is China's most important external source of oil.

...[the USA] underestimates Beijing's interests in Iran and its preparedness to protect the significant political, economic and strategic investments it has made in this pivotal country, investments that have recently seen China replace the European Union as Iran's largest trading partner."

-- Anthony Bubalo

"THIS year, China will use Somali piracy as a reason to project naval force. It is natural Beijing should share the burden of guarding against pirates who endanger global trade routes.
...Piracy gives China the excuse to keep forces indefinitely in the Gulf of Aden. The next step,urge some Chinese analysts, should be an overseas base."

-- Rory Medcalf

* New World Order -
see also:


Natural Born Citizen, free of foreign citizenship, free of foreign allegiances. Barack doesn't qualify.

In the Madison Debates, on September 7, 1787, it was then that it was entered that "the President should be a natural- born Citizen," of which he bore no allegiance or citizenship to any other nation than that of the United States of America.

In the ratification of the Constitution by the State of New York; July 26, 1788
“That no Persons except natural born Citizens, or such as were Citizens on or before the fourth day of July one thousand seven hundred and seventy six, or such as held Commissions under the United States during the War, and have at any time since the fourth day of July one thousand seven hundred and seventy six become Citizens of one or other of the United States, and who shall be Freeholders, shall be eligible to the Places of President, Vice President, or Members of either House of the Congress of the United States.”
“That the Court for the Trial of Impeachments shall consist of the Senate, the Judges of the Supreme Court of the United States….”


Because of the precariousness of the times, there was in the early days of our Republic, a demand for 100% allegiance and citizenship to the United States of America. You were either "all in" or you were to be excluded out. In the case of Barack Obama, for 2 years past his 21st birthday, he had split citizenship with Kenya and Great Britain (at the very least). Under Immigration Law, he needed to declare his oath of allegiance at age 21 to a United States Department of State official. Barack never took an oath to the United States until he was elected as an Illinois State Senator...and even then, they were just "muttering words" not unlike the Christian prayers he despised from that "parched nun" in Indonesia he remembered from his childhood, "muttering words" without substance to Barack, "words" bandied about that came with accepting the office.

US Constitution, Article 2, officially ratified on March 4, 1789 -- would therefore, in part, read:
"No person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the United States."


In 1833, in Justice Joseph Story's Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States. § 1473

It is indispensible too, that the president should be a natural born citizen of the United States; or a citizen at the adoption of the constitution, and for 14 years before his election. This permission of a naturalized citizen [to speak of those to who fought the Revolutionary War] to become President is an exception [read: "the only exception" -- Brianroy] from the great fundamental policy of all governments, to exclude foreign influence from their executive councils and duties. It was doubtless introduced (for it has now become by lapse of time merely nominal, and will soon become wholly extinct) out of respect to those distinguished revolutionary patriots who were born in a foreign land, and yet had entitled themselves to high honors in their adopted country. A positive exclusion of them from the office would have been unjust to their merits and painful to their sensibilities.

But the general propriety of the exclusion of foreigners, in common cases, will scarcely be doubted by any sound statesman. It cuts off all chances for ambitious foreigners, who might otherwise be intriguing for the office; and interposes a barrier against those corrupt interferences of foreign governments in executive elections, which have inflicted the most serious evils upon the elective monarchies of Europe. Germany, Poland, and even the pontificate of Rome, are sad, but instructive examples of the enduring mischiefs arising from this source.”


Obama's biological father was never a US Citizen, even by Barack's own auto-biographical admission: Barack Obama Sr. was a Kenyan National and a dual British Commonwealth citizen who studied in the USA under a transient / student visa. Hence, even by that fact alone, this makes Obama unconstitutional and a usurper of the Office of the Presidency by fraud.

When the Confederate States of America were formed, in their Constitution for the Provisional Government on March 2, 1861, they specifically followed the same formula:
"Article 2.3 No person, except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of one of the States of this Confederacy at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident of one of the States of this Confederacy."

When the South revised the language of their Confederate Constitution on March 11, 1861 they amended and moved the NBC clause to read:

"Article 2.7 No person except a natural-born citizen of the Confederate States, or a citizen thereof at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, or a citizen thereof born in the United States prior to the 20th of December, 1860, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained the age of thirty-five years, and been fourteen years a resident within the limits of the Confederate States, as they may exist at the time of his election." http://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/csa_csa.asp

In Bute v. Illinois, 333 U.S. 640 (1948) @ 653, http://supreme.justia.com/us/333/640/case.html
states: “The burden of establishing a delegation of power to the United States or the prohibition of power to the states is upon those making the claim.”

Since Obama claims to be a United States Natural Born Citizen...it is Obama's obligation to prove that his father was a United States Citizen of any type AT THE TIME OF HIS ALLEGED BIRTH IN 1961 in order to hold the office.

Under 1961 US Law, Ann Dunham-Obama had not lived in the US 5 years past her 14th birthday to confer on Barack the citizenship Obama supporters so claim for him.

Since US Law relevant to the birth year of John McCain is relevant to John McCain's lack of standing also, by that same standard, all other arguments to change the NBC definition since 1961 are moot.

I say this especially in regard to those who cite re-definitions NOT according to United States Supreme Court Case Law, but ill-informed and Progressive and corrupted "opinions" of the last decade, seeking to reinvent the NBC definition from that known since the Colonial days and the founding years of the Republic, on through to 1961.

It is the FATHER that passes on the "natural born status" and "primary citizenship" of the child. The mother's nationality cannot contradict or over-ride the Father's passing on the "natural born status" to the child. Period!

Only in the case that the child has no "known" father, and only then, can the mother pass on NBC status.

In regard to the "not of age" mother -- by 1961 US Laws on Citizenship -- Ann Dunham-Obama was MOST CERTAINLY UNABLE to legally confer on Barack a United States Citizenship of an NBC status...clearly, that is settled Law!

The only thing lacking, until this year, is a filing having legal standing.

Even when someone "usurps" power in the US, those who wish to oppose the usurper are required to jump through legal hoops to satisfy the Law. This is why political and union corruption, and mafias, and other forms of organized crime are able to thrive for many years, and remain empowered as if they were legitimate, when they are later found out or ruled as NOT.

Since, in his own words, Obama the usurper has testified that his father was Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., the same foreign national who only lived in the United States as a foreign transient alien on a student visa...he must so vacate the Office immediately.

Monday, February 15, 2010

Amen to Lt. Col. Allen West! He tells the war on Terror and Jihadist Muslim Fundamentalism like it is!

Lt. Col. Allen West, retired, starts at 1:38 into the clip.

“Let me say this. And this, I don't care about being popular. Whatever. But the first thing you got to do is study and understand who you are up against.

And you must realize that this is not a religion that you're fighting against. We're fighting against a geo-political police system and construct.

You're fighting against something that's been doing this thing since 622 A.D., 7th Century, 1388 years.

You want to dig up Charles Martel and ask him why him why he was fighting the Muslim army at the Battle of Tours in 732?

You want to ask the Venetian fleet at Lepanto why they were fighting a Muslim fleet in 1571?

You want to ask the Christian,uh, I mean the Germanic and Austrian knights why they were fighting at the gates of Vienna in 1683?

You want to ask people what happened at Constantinople and why today it is called Istanbul because they lost that fight in 1453?

You need to get into the Koran; you need to understand their precepts; you need to read the uh, the Surah; you need to read the Hadith; and then you can undertsand that this is not a perversion. They are doing exactly what this book says.

{applause} and I wanna close, and I wanna close by saying this...
Until you get principled leadership in the United States of America that is willing to say that, we will continue to chase our tail; because we will never clearly define who this enemy is, and then understand their goals and objectives -- which is on ANY jihadist website -- and then come up with the right and proper goals to not only secure our Republic, but to secure Western Civilization. Thank you."

Update: 02/16/2010
I discovered I was preceded at least twice on this. My transcript is the most complete, though.



Sunday, February 14, 2010

Obama and the Pakistani connection

From 1978-1985, Pakistan spent 7 years in strict Islamic Sharia Law that governed internal affairs, and created stringencies on travel in and out of that nation. During this time, over the course of 5 years, Ann Dunham-Obama-Soetoro made regular visits into Pakistan. It is alleged that she did so as a banking representative, but we just do not know. If she was in Pakistan, she would have had to be covered from head to foot during the years 1978 -1985.

Barack, we are told by his own Presidential Campaign spoke people and the Pakistani media and others, visited Pakistan. But for the event, Barack is not forthcoming other than that it was a 3 week jaunt, in or about 1981.

In December 1979, beginning December 27 with air strikes,


the Soviet Union began to attack and invade Afghanistan. It was while that war was raging, after only a year, and while America's US Embassy hostages were still held at gunpoint in Tehran, Iran by extremist Muslim radicals for 7 weeks longer than the Russian War in Afghanistan...that Barack Obama visited neighboring Pakistan.

What is the psychology behind such an individual who enters a highly hostile Sharia gripped nation (Pakistan), with a Muslim "holy war" against invaders to its north, and out of control extremists wanting to kill all Westerners on its borders to its west?

The answer: Obama did not consider himself a non-Muslim. Obama did not consider himself a Westerner. Obama would have argued, and been supported by the wealthy and influential Pakistanis, the Chandoo family, that he was a Shia (Iranian faction) Muslim Indonesian with an Indonesian passport, and having Kenyan (African) roots.

Recently, we have also the testimony of John C. Drew,
who dined and discussed politics with Barack during Christmas break in December 1980.

Barack made an negative and lasting impression, arguing a virulent Marxist-Communist view as if he were of the up and coming vanguard.

For those not old enough, 1980 was at the height of the cold war, and those arguing virulently for Communism were susceptible to being physically assaulted and battered as traitors, and then ostracized by the Community at large in this era. Therefore, to a large degree, they only argued these beliefs in 1980 in "comfort zones", lest they provoke nearby American Patriots and get a "beat down", because the Soviet view was to destroy or enslave Americans. In 2010, the promotion and advocation of a Communist takeover of America often barely gets anyone's attention. In a crowd of 2,000, one would likely find only one or several who understand the Concentration Camp end-game the speaker would envision, and be hustled away as "disturbing the peace".

America is now like the Jews of Germany, asleep at the switch, just waiting to be rounded up and executed like lambs led to the slaughter. And by creating a pseudo-extreme national emergency, Obama would merely cite past Executive Orders, and for the purpose of "60 days" that is ever extended thereafter, seize dictatorship and do to America's Conservative and Christian populations under ideology, what Nazi Germany did to the Jews under reasons of genetically.

See also: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4nWalq3aK9I

Though of these Executive Orders, some were signed on February 16, 1962 by JFK and later revoked by President Nixon...the abuse of Executive Orders, especially by someone like Obama who violates the Constitution in 2.1 to be in office, and 1.6 in appointing a sitting Senator as Secretary of State...such a one would have no qualms in using ANY major enough future "state of emergency" to assume the powers of dictatorship with the stroke of a pen.

“We are reviewing a list of presidential executive orders and directives to get the job done across a front of issues,” said Rahm Emanuel.

That potential dictatorial abuse is a political fact...and only the fear of a mass uprising from the people along with the Courts, Congress, and within his own Executive Branch...and a subsequent arrest for High Treason by such an act, has so far kept Obama from exercising that claim of authority. Thank G-D for that!

In regard to 1980, John Drew also stated that Barack was not just friends with Mohammed Hasan Chandoo, but that he was the room-mate of the BMW driving Pakistani national Chandoo. The fact that Chandoo was a very close friend of Barack and Barack's Occidental college room-mate has been heretofore kept close to the vest, in an attempt to PREVENT "transparency.

Obama spokesman Bill Burton told ABC News that Barack spent 3 weeks in Karachi Pakistan with a side trip to Hyderabad India in 1981. The Pakistani news Media reported that the trip was during Partridge hunting season, which lasts from November to January there.

Karachi on map:

Partridge season in Pakistan: http://www.dailytimes.com.pk/default.asp?page=2007%5C11%5C19%5Cstory_19-11-2007_pg7_38

3 weeks: http://www.pak-times.com/2008/07/10/obamas-larkana-cnnection/

While Obama die-hards may blow Hyderabad India as just a visit with a college room-mate Vinai Thummalapally from 1980:

Hyderabad India as a city was the Mecca of Jihadist Shia Muslim Indoctrination:

Obama's mother made jaunts to Pakistan over the course of 5 years about this time, and was likely present in Pakistan for an unknown number of weeks on assignment:

Obama specifically hung out and befriended wealthy Pakistani land-owners like
the Chandoo family, to whom the peasants bowed to as they passed by, and Obama was reported as being so impressed, that he could not get over this bowing aspect.

As a usurper, he deep bowed first to the King of Saudi Arabia, then to the Emperor of Japan, and then to the mayor of Tampa at the apparent behest of White House counsel.

But in regard to Obama's collegiate "Pakistani friends", these were probably met first through his mother. In 1980-1981, Ann Dunham-Obama-Soetoro served as a high level banking emissary into Pakistan, tied into the Ford Foundation and other Progressive Socialists in the United States. It is my opinion, that Barack's mother (as an emissary of American Progressives or Socialist-Communists making international Capitalist in-roads in Third World nations at the time), was some kind of advance team banking emmisary, who was able to dually follow the Progressive brand of anthroplogical world propaganda, and offer the necessary cover work (under the guise of charitable or social work) to do so.

Remember, we are dealing with a President Jimmy Carter's Presidency, and Cold War world of 1980-1981. In my opinion. Jimmy Carter was the worst President of the 20th Century, and to say more negatively of a legitimately elected NBC qualified US President would risk me spilling over into violating the precept, "You shall not speak ill of a [legitimate] chief ruler of your people". The emphasis of restraint in the citaion used by Paul the Apostle in Acts, is on the aspect of legitimacy, to which Barack is clearly NOT.

In 1980-1981, Barack was indeed a British Commonwealth Citizen, as well as a Kenyan Natural Born Citizen, as even the Communist-Socialist friendly Annenburg Institute funded Factcheck.org Propaganda web-site confesses.

{Pulled up on 02/04/2010 -- Brianroy}
"Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1984.

Corrected (Sep. 3, 2009): Our original article incorrectly stated that then-Sen. Obama lost his Kenyan citizenship on Aug. 4, 1982. The correct date is Aug. 4, 1984. The Kenyan Constitution required Obama to choose whether to keep either his U.S. or Kenyan citizenship upon his 21st birthday, which was in 1982. But we initially missed that the Constitution provided him a two-year window for making that choice. So Obama did not lose his Kenyan citizenship until his 23rd birthday in 1984. We have updated the item to reflect this.

- Joe Miller
Rocky Mountain News Staff. "Things You Might Not Know About Barack Obama." 6 August 2007. The Rocky Mountain News. 24 August 2008.

Temple, John. "8-word Gaffe Ripples Across Web." 15 August 2007. The Rocky Mountain News. 24 August 2008.

The British Nationality Act, 1948. 1948. 24 August 2008.

"The Constitution of Kenya." 1963 (revised, 2001). The Parliament of Kenya. 24 August 2008."

And since it is alleged and highly likely Obama was also (in 1980-1981) claiming also to be a citizen of Indonesia in the use of the Indonesian passport, its renewal at 5 year intervals...we have to wonder if he felt ANY allegiance to the United States at all in January 1981 at the alleged age of 19.

Obama made the claim that because of Pakistan, and his trip there, that he "knew what Sunni and Shia was before I joined the Senate Foreign Relations Committee."

The Sunni were made to bow to the Shia out of great fear in Pakistan, because Iran was Sunni, and its radical influence was terrorizing its bordering nations. So it was in Pakistan, that Obama learned terrorism by threats and words and by the actuary of revolution, and its enforcement, was the difference. The willingness of the Iron Will, like Adolf Hitler always spoke of, the carrying out of the plan of action or agenda, and never compromising with the peasant class. You are Shia, the bringer of death and the uplifter of the coming Mahdi...you are to be worshipped and bowed down to by the masses, and they must bend to your will or be shattered and destroyed. And in the fires of revolution, you will make them soft like clay again, and remold them to your will, and into the image and future you project for them...a life of submission where "work makes free" / "arbeit macht frei".

And it was perhaps for this reason he became really turned on to the writings and precepts of the Communist-anarchist Saul Alinsky, who taught to overcome the West for Communism by "any means necessary". And with this mindset, Obama saw himself in his midtown Manhattan office during his Columbia years "like a spy behind enemy lines" and penned those words in "Dreams of My Father".

Obama also befriended another wealthy upper class Pakistani in Wahid Hamid; but also knew the New York Times reported pot smoking and cocaine snorting Sohale Siddiqi, from Karachi Pakistan while in New York City, and allegedly did the same drugs with Saddiq past the age of 21. However, Barack's 1st year room-mates at Columbia were actually Pakistani Imad Husain and Paul Carpenter (who became a Los Angeles attorney).

So based on the reconstruction...since Obama hides from his past and is NOT forth-coming...that while Barack schooled with wealthy Pakistani land-owner's kids through his first two colleges, it appears that his "momma" allegedly was using that to take advantage for Capitalist Banks (allegedly using also some of her mother's -- Barack's maternal grandmother --Hawaiian banking related contacts), while allegedly making in-roads to eventually slave wage starve the Pakistani people out of wealth, contrary to the principles of Marxism, and allegedly exhibiting a clear hypocrisy and promotion of selfish ambitions over the Community.

So who is the real humanitarian? The one who brings in the blood-suckers, or the one that empowers tyrants to abuse and beat down the poor? From what I can see in Obama's his alleged maternal family past, we have only the two above options.

What is Obama's real Community Organizing record in Chicago? Did he really help? Or did he prolong the agony of the working poor? Barack used legalized forms of extortion, blackmail, and intimidation against the banks in Chicago; in order to force banks to give loans to people who could neither afford or pay back the bank loans...or so it is media reported, and media confirmed as factual. Is this why both Barack and his wife Michelle LOST their licences to practice Law and are no longer licensed attorneys?

What were the circumstances that compelled Obama and wife to cease the ability to practice Law, other than a need to permanently revoke their licenses on a NATIONAL SCALE? The Media and the people of the United States of America, need to demand answers. I personally believe that they also need to demand that Obama be removed from the Presidency as a "lawless" one, on a multi-definitional level. But as the title of my thread "Brianroy's Input" implies clearly, that is just my personal and ediotorial "free speech" opinion.

Update: 02/17/2010
John C. Drew in a recent radio interview:

Link: College Acquaintance: Young Obama Was 'Pure Marxis

Thursday, February 11, 2010

Poetry by Brianroy: A Field of view, in a winter season looking out to sea from the side of a hill.

I look across the ocean,
as it the cold winter waves rise and fall;
and the breeze blows stingingly upon my face and about my head,
and the melancholy of the moment yet brings tranquility.

The white and grey clouds blow across the deep blue skies,
as if great cotton balls and pilings of mist.
Sometimes looking like mountain ranges of the heavens,
sometimes, well...you get the jist.

What are these seasons for,
of life and dormancy?
Do they teach us something about ourselves,
and how we ought to live?

I behold the barren beaches and shorelines,
the jetties and the rocks.

I behold the once green and bending marshes,
now brown like dead grass and broken stocks.

What is the lesson here,
but that G-D is never to far or long away?

Though through times of sadness and suffering we must go,
there is always the hope of a better day.

And when that time comes, seize the moment and the hour;
apply the best that you can fairly and equitably,
or as much as you are granted in your power.

And know also, that your works too, shall zenith and fall;
and in another season, again you shall look back and recall.

Let there be no regrets, that honorably and faithfully you have done;
that looking back you might have blessed by your efforts to hold to a higher calling,
and in the remembrance, with fondness, be considered as having victories won.

Won not by violence or blood, but of the heart and the minds;
that to G-D mankind all may freely call through Jesus Christ the Son,
and to one another be thoughtful and kind.

But as I stand here, and now look at my watch,
I realize my feet are almost frozen and I am so cold;
and as I make for shelter and warmmth,
I can only hope that the best points are not forgotten in the heat of trying to do the right,
and that the best from me is always as new, and never as forgotten and old.

Wednesday, February 10, 2010

Obama's Certification of Live Birth proved a fraud by WND, AtlasShrugs, and now a TEA Party Oklahoma nominee for Congress


"Miki Booth, originally from Hawaii, is running for the U.S. House of Representatives in Oklahoma's second district".

Miki made her appearance on C-Span on Friday, 02/06/2010, the day after Joseph Farah spoke.
at 38 minutes ff.

I posted Joe Farah's February 05, 2010 Birth Certificate Challenge and TEA Party motivating speech on that date. Do you know what Miki Booth presented? The kind of evidence that blasts the MSNBC anthropolatrists into orbit in hysterical twitches, screams, weepings, and gnashings of teeth.

On C-Span 02/06/2009, at the end of an earlier session than Sarah Palin's finalizing the TEA Party event, Miki Booth presented a Certificate of Live Birth from 1949, in which her husband was born at Kapi-olani Hospital, 12 years before Obama's alleged birth -- in Kenya, in Indonesis, in Queen's, and finally at Kapi'olani -- showing that the state of Hawaii issued LONG FORM CERTIFICATE'S OF LIVE BIRTH in 1949.

In 1949, Kapiolani was listed on the Certificate of Live Birth as Kapiolani Mat. & Gyn. Hospital at 1929 Vancouver Drive.

The previous Kapi-olani address in existence when Barack was allegedly born in 1961, was not quite a mile to the East of the current Kapiolani Hospital built in the 1970s, and further away from the Queen's hospital than the 70's Kapi'olani facility was. Yet, Obama and his sister Maya conflictingly and at different times, released that Barack was born in Queen's between 2004-2008, and which is now in evidence as part of Philip Berg's lawsuit in Philadelphia against Obama on behalf of his client.

In a separate story last summer, World Net Daily broke the story of Obama's forged / out of sequence Birth Certification Numbers abbreviated by 2 numbers from what an original would be...and using TWO BIRTH CERTIFICATES from Kapi'olani Hospital in 1961, declaring tow back-to-back births born after Obama's alleged birth, but both having lower numbers of issue to prove Obama's Birth Certificate is fraudulent.

The Nordykes birth at Kapi-olani were given 151 – 61 – 10637 and 151 - 61 - 10638 both being born on August 05, 1961.

Obama's forgery claims Barack was born with the number 151 - 1961 - 10641 being born on August 04, 1961.

Obama has claimed being born in Indonesia to Tammy Duckworth, being born in Queen's, and has rested his political career in the claim to Kapi'olani. However, while the 1963 Certificate of Live Birth as issued by the US ARMY Tripler General Hospital in Hawaii

appears to be consistent with what Miki Booth's husband of 1949 and the Nordyke twins of 1961 over at Kapi'olani were issued, the Obama forgery is a "piece of junk" in the words of Miki Booth on 02/06/2010 at the Nashville TEA Party.

For further corroboration, Miki Booth produced her son's 1981 Kapi'olani Hospital Certificate of Live Birth,
which shows that in 1981, Kapi'olani had not changed or altered their issuance by any extreme, and show that the Obama Campaign "Certification of Live Birth" is NOT a UNITED STATES birth...as claimed by "Lie with a Smile" Robert Gibbs, but for the foreign born.

Again, the proof is that Obama is Foreign Born in the absence of any release of proof per Bute v. Illinois, 333 U.S. 640, see 653 (1948 and 533 US 53 see 54,62; NGUYEN ET AL. v. INS.

It is the goal of the Communist-Socialists (aka. "Progressives") who have joined Obama to overthrow the US Constitution from within the Government to work like mobsters irrespective of the Constitutional Law...in order to re-make the future to whatever way they want it, and by any means necessary.

All the above cited births -- EXCEPT for Obama -- can show they were born in Honolulu based on the evidence.

For more Obama Birth Certificate forgery information, see Pamela Geller's commendable collection of articles at:


And for an example of how easy it is to forge the Obama Document, here is a link to New Jersey Lawyer Mario Apuzzo's example of the Barack Obama Certificate listing Obama's information under the name of "Mickey Hussein Mouse II" at:

In the same way they told us through the Vietnam War Era News Media that you cannot vote for a fictional character like "Mickey Mouse"...so too, America needs to know that you cannot vote for a fictional US NBC for the Presidency.

Al Qaeda successfully blew up an Ethiopian 737-800 , reports DEBKAfile

Reported in January 2010



"We saw fire falling down from the sky into the sea," said Khaled Naser, a gas station attendant who saw the plane go down around 2:30 a.m.

New Information Realease from DEBKAfile:


Ethiopian Airline crash off Beirut was an act of Al-Qaeda terror

DEBKA file, an Israeli Intelligence Watchdog, reports that Al Qaeda successfully blew up an Ethiopian 737-800 last month on January 25. The questions are: Did they use the same technique as the Northwest Terrorist Underwear Bomber? Did they use a female suicide bomber instead of a male passenger, to avert suspicion? The answer: We simply just do not know, yet.

In this instance, undercover agents from France and the wife of a French ambassador were the target. "...top Hizballah operatives, including secretary general Hassan Nasrallah" simply deplaned after being warned at the last minutes, and let their Muslim Brothers kill all on board the plane without so much as a word of warning to anyone not of their group.

If Al-Qaeda simply wants to target any aircraft heading to the United States, their comfort zone appears to remain triangulated in the Eastern Mediterranean regions to Kenya and over to Pakistan, and then separately in the Malaysia.to Indonesian pocket. So I guess, if Americans don't need to travel overseas to these regions, until new and more stringent security measures are installed and in use...or unless they fly El Al...don't.

Monday, February 8, 2010

Obama Administration and Campaigns and friends all are now guilty as SUBVERSIVE ORGANIZATIONS under S. Carolina Act / Law

South Carolina...will it choose to exercise a pro-Constitutional kickback against the unConstitutional Obama and his Socialist-Communist friends as they try to overthrow the US Constitution? Or is this just hot air, and an invitation to an Obama Totalitarian State against all who dare disagree with Obama? That is, to overthrow Obama's policies or advocate the same, would be like when the British took people outside and shot them dead without trial in the Colonial days. But instead, being more civilized, South Carolina simply gives the victims 10 years in prison and a $25,000 fine.

Obama's campaign took foreign monies for elections, used terrorist labor groups to work the election phones, consorted with foreign governments like Iraq to work against cooperating with the Bush Administration to create election tension favorable to them (violating the Logan Act), advocated the overthrow of the United States of America by their own definition of "fundamentally transforming America" as defined on how they view the need to crash the system -- throw out the US Constitution -- and start over. Where is Obama's prosecution? What of the quid pro quo effect even at the Federal levels?

"Whoever solicits or receives 'any' thing of value, in consideration of the promise of support or use of influence in obtaining for any person any appointive office or place under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both." -- 18 USC Chapter 11 Section 211

Where is George Soros's prosecution? What about Andy Stern of the SEIU (whose group drafts the majority of the Healthcare Bills aimed at Federal Usurpation of Constitutional powers) and Wade Rathke of ACORN and others there (whose organization defrauded voters in some (allegedly 17) states during the 2008 Presidential election? And on and on we can go.

So will the State of South Carolina take on the illegal office holder and his Czars, his so-called board of directors to the neo-Communist-Socialist Oligarchy Government they intend to replace our current Republic with?

No US politician at this time has the patriotism, the guts, and the foundation of all he or she needs to challenge Obama on the merits of his illegality...not because the information isn't there, as my detailed and sourced challenges shortened for only the sake of length prove... but they worry more about themselves than anything else. The TEA party can provide the base of support using informed and rational arguments, and there is enough of an Internet Conservative base to spread the word and grow the movement legally and peacefully, until the goals are met.

That means talking to the world media and creating interest and pressure from without, to legally and peacefully work within the system and make change to move the USA more toward an Originalist Constitutional View of how to conduct Government from within. Smaller Federal Government with less Bureaucracy, a lower tax rate, a removal of pork spending, a demand for better stewardship, a freeze or cuts on federal pay-scales by 30% for the next 10 years, a required amount of time for Representatives to hear from their constituents and their address of grievances before moving ahead with major legislation (up to 30 days), no taxation increases without it being the majority opinion of at least 67% of their constituents, and so on.

South Carolina expects Communist-Socialists like ACORN and the ACLU and also terrorists like in Muslim Synagogues run by Hamas, Hezbollah, etc. in South Carolina to actually "register" as subversives? Are they smoking dope when they write this stuff? Or is it intentionally written against one group that might sue for their rights, and a intentionally gapped legislation to let the Communists and Terrorists to walk free, while punishing the non-Muslim terrorists, non-Communists, non-traitors by making the definitions change or evolve on our watch?



South Carolina Code of Laws

Title 23 - Law Enforcement and Public Safety

SECTION 23-29-10. Short title.
This chapter may be cited as the "Subversive Activities Registration Act."

SECTION 23-29-20. Definitions.
For the purposes of this chapter the following words, phrases and terms are defined as follows:
(1) "Subversive organization" means every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or organization, composed of two or more persons, which directly or indirectly advocates, advises, teaches or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means;
(2) "Organization subject to foreign control" means every corporation, society, association, camp, group, bund, political party, assembly, body or other organization, composed of two or more persons, which comes within either of the following:
(a) it solicits or accepts financial contributions, loans or support of any kind directly or indirectly from, or is affiliated directly or indirectly with, a foreign government or a political subdivision thereof, an agent, agency or instrumentality of a foreign government or political subdivision thereof, a political party in a foreign country or an international political organization or
(b) its policies, or any of them, are determined by or at the suggestion of, or in collaboration with, a foreign government or political subdivision thereof, an agent, agency or instrumentality of a foreign government or a political subdivision thereof, a political party in a foreign country or an international political organization;
(3) "Foreign agent" means any person whose actions, or any of them, are determined by or at the suggestion of, or in collaboration with, a foreign government or political subdivision thereof, an instrumentality or agency of a foreign government or political subdivision thereof, a political party in a foreign country or an international political organization; and
(4) "Business" includes, but is not limited to, speaking engagements.

SECTION 23-29-30. Effect on freedom of press or speech.
Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to authorize, require or establish censorship or to limit in any way or infringe upon freedom of the press or of speech as guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States and no regulation shall be promulgated hereunder having that effect.

SECTION 23-29-40. Organizations exempt from application of chapter.
The terms of this chapter do not apply to any labor union or religious, fraternal or patriotic organization, society or association, or their members, whose objectives and aims do not contemplate the overthrow of the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means.

SECTION 23-29-50. Registration by subversive and foreign-controlled organizations.
Every subversive organization and organization subject to foreign control shall register with the Secretary of State on forms prescribed by him within thirty days after coming into existence in this State.

SECTION 23-29-60. Registration of members of subversive and foreign-controlled organizations.
Every member of a subversive organization, or an organization subject to foreign control, every foreign agent and every person who advocates, teaches, advises or practices the duty, necessity or propriety of controlling, conducting, seizing or overthrowing the government of the United States, of this State or of any political subdivision thereof by force or violence or other unlawful means, who resides, transacts any business or attempts to influence political action in this State, shall register with the Secretary of State on the forms and at the times prescribed by him.

SECTION 23-29-70. Forms and schedule for filing information.
Every organization or person coming within the provisions of this chapter shall file with the Secretary of State all information which he may request, on the forms and at the times he may prescribe.

SECTION 23-29-80. Promulgation of rules and regulations.
The Secretary of State may adopt and promulgate any rules and regulations, not inconsistent with the terms of this chapter, which may be necessary to carry out the provisions of this chapter and may alter or repeal such rules and regulations.

SECTION 23-29-90. Penalties.
Any organization or person who violates any of the provisions of this chapter shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by a fine of not more than twenty-five thousand dollars or imprisonment for not more than ten years, or by both fine and imprisonment.


Are there unfounded fears about this law? Keep in mind that Harold Koh at the State Department demands, along with Obama and executive usurpers (by association), that we be subject to International Law, NOT US CONSTITUTIONAL LAW. An international court could cite South Carolina's Act as a precedent, add stringencies, and apply it to all Americans. In fact, Canada and Mexico are supposed to join the US in being a region under one international governance in the New World Order, and Europe in the past and present does not believe in "free speech" for the majority.

Case in point: Geert Wilders. On trial in early February 2010, and currently, as of 02/08/2010 on going.


Geert Wilders was charged with:
1) making collective or group insults of Muslims,
2) inciting hatred or discrimination against Muslims based on their religious beliefs
[Read: even if many are violently bloodthirsty alien oppressors and clearly perverse, wanting to subjugate and take over the Netherlands by force and fear],
3) inciting xenophobic hatred and discrimination, especially against Moroccans due to their race.

When the British forcibly entered the homes and took over the American Colonies by acts of legalized violence, thefts, rapes of its subjects under the Stamp Act...and without trial, simply took Colonial citizens and shot them dead, without even asking a single question of them...the colonies eventually took up the gun when the right to free speech and redress their grievances were denied.

The world of violence in the Middle Ages to the Revolutionary War was often horrific. Case in point, what happened to those who were charged with High Treason hundreds of years ago...from which barbarity we Americans refused to imitate?

"THE punishment of high treafon in general is very solemn and terrible."

1. That the offender be drawn to the gallows, and not be carried or walk; though usually a fledge or hurdle is allowed, to preserve the offender from the extreme torment of being dragged on the ground or pavement.

2. That he be hanged by the neck, and then cut down alive.

3. That his entrails (intestines) be taken out, and burned, while he is yet alive.

4. That his head be cut off.

5. That his body be divided into four parts.

6. That his head and quarters be "at the king's dispofal." (disposal)

"THE king may, and often doth, discharge all the punishment, except beheading, especially where any of noble blood are attainted. For, beheading being part of the judgment, that may be executed, though all the rest be omitted by the king's command." -- Blackstone 4.6 at p. 95


Joseph Story, Commentaries on the Constitution, 3.28 @1293 citing same
http://www.lonang.com/exlibris/story/sto-328.htm#fn1d ]

Governments and the judges that operate in them ought to exercise common sense (if they have any left) and to be very careful of any regulating of rare and historically unique gift we have of the right to one's own personal opinion and free speech, or the right to redress their grievances. It may take centuries to turn back from such a mess once we have quagmired away from our inalienable rights and liberties given us from G-D. History is a testimony to that fact. They ought not to be legislating unjust back-lash or the shedding of innocent citizen blood for personal political gain as communists and tyrants who want their Government and structural order to break down into anarchy and chaos apparently do. History tells us that the denial of free speech with violent oppressions on a multi-faceted front disallows the release of needed pressures placed upon the masses, and ultimately leads to violence.

That is why the TEA Party is a healthy release. That is why Conservative Talk Radio and any such on Television is a healthy release. That is why Free Speech and the right to hold to one's own opinion, is a healthy release.

We need legal and peaceful ways of resolving issues...and if the facts or history of a group's rhetoric of taking over the world by violence, killing all unbelievers, raping girls of only 6 to 9 years old and calling them wives is inciting hatred...don't get mad at the one crying out the alarm, go after the one's espousing pedophilia and doing it, go after the one's killing for any reason or no reason at all, and then hiding behind "religion" like the backward thinking terrorists that far too many Muslim extremists and fundamentalists are. We have their texts, their hadiths, their regular current video and televised statements all telling us they mean to take over, to kill, and to oppress any who do not submit to their will. So why protect the murderers and imprison the victims in the Netherlands, or anywhere for that matter, who protest?