So states the Store for BarackObama.com regarding Obama's alleged Birth Certificate Mug:
"Made In The USA Mug
There's really no way to make the birth certificate conspiracy completely go away, so we might as well laugh at it -- and make sure as many people as possible are in on the joke. Get your Made In The USA mug today. (SKU OFA0805) $20"
Mug Picture = Proof?
What is the pitch? Read it again. It is to this effect:
"Buy Obama's mug because it says Obama was "Made in the USA", but it does NOT say "BORN in the USA?"
MADE is defined as "artificially produced", "fictitious, invented".
The Mug does NOT define or infer "made" as a slang, such as in "making babies" / "having sexual intercourse with vaginal penetration by the phallus". So even from the making babies or conception non-issue declaration: yeah, we got the "made" part.
But where is the "BORN" phraseology? It isn't there!!! So are we having an Obama 2012 Campaign confession to facts and supposition we already know? Barack was conceived or inseminated in the womb of his mother in the USA and BORN SOMEWHERE ELSE, AND HIS BIRTH DOCUMENT WAS FABRICATED. THE MUG IS A CLEAR ADMISSION OF OBAMA'S FABRICATION OF BIRTH PLACE AND FABRICATION OF DOCUMENTATION GUILT!!!
Talk about your Freudian slip.
So what are Obama's spokespersons saying in their campaign finance raising pitches now? If it's printed on a mug it must be real?
Actually, the definition of
"believing into a document that is supposed to stand up in a Court of Law, and is refused to be submitted into Court as Evidence -- and the fact that even Obama's own supporters have NOW defined the reason for that refusal of submission into any Court of Law as evidence, citing the excuse on their own $20 Mug and being based on the definition of carefully well chosen words as Intellectuals in using the word 'MADE' -- and believing into a document that even the Obama Campaign states on its own Obama Mug that the Obama Certification of Live Birth document and any claim of a USA birth location was artificially produced, fictitious, and artificially produced"
to still thereafter believe into Obama's White House released electronic forgery as though it were a Court acceptable genuine document...well, that falls into the realm of believing into a "Mythology".
Good grief! I mean, really. A document that they willingly only share in a Public Relations atmosphere where it is NOT illegal to lie, because they are NOT under Oath under penalty of perjury with Criminal consequences the moment they lie.
Don't tell me. The Obama people and the "will lap-dance Obama Media" will tell us something to the effect that the person the electronically produced Certificate of Live Birth, the one that Hawaii Department of Health Director Neal Palafox said was non-existent in the Vault Copies of Hawaii in January 2011 when he checked at the insistence of Governor Abercrombie, the same document OBAMA AND HIS LAWYERS WILL ONLY PRESS CONFERENCE DECLARE AND REFUSE TO INTRODUCE AS EVIDENCE IN A COURT OF LAW, is "real", because if it's on the side of a mug it thus makes it a genuine verification of a reality?
So let me get this right. If Obama's spokespeople at a Hollywood Elite Fundraiser Event should see a mug with Snoopy on it, and thereafter they go to an amusement park like Knott's Berry Farm in Los Angeles, and they see someone dressed up in a giant Snoopy costume, are they going to now be tripping out like they've been dropping acid and trying to relive the late 1960s or first years of the 1970s, telling us how a Charles Schultz' cartoon character was "really real, dude?" Oh yeah. I guess after a trip to Disneyland (in California) or Disney World (in Florida), Mickey Mouse must be real to them ,too; and perhaps that's why these Obama supporting yokels were insisting everyone who registered as Mickey Mouse in Wisconsin was a legitimate voter, wasn't it? Don't believe Mickey Mouse is real? Welcome to the new version of reality being put forth by Obama's spokespeople, where they will now say: "Look, he's on the side of the mug! That's all the proof you need!"
What next? Dog on 2012 Campaign button = Get the Bestiality Votes?
So what's next? In the Fall of 2012, in the Voter Registry, will we probably also find Bo Obama registered to vote at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue come Election time? After all, he's on a campaign button for 2012.
What would stop Obama's people from justifying registering a dog to vote? Their campaign 2008 in part depended on ACORN voting for Barack under the names of dead people in swing states like Ohio. So making the transition from dead people to animals in voting by proxy isn't as far-fetched with Obama-philes as one might have otherwise thought. Think about this: in 2011, Obama had absolutely no problem lifting the ban on Bestiality (sexual intercourse between humans and animals) in the Military,
even when it was brought to his and his Press Secretary's attention.
Notice how Obama's own Press Secretary blew a challenge to legalizing bestiality off as if it were a matter of privacy between a consenting adult and? This consensus approach was followed by the issuing forth of Obama's dog Bo on Obama 2012 Campaign buttons. Or maybe it was the buttons first, and then the acceptance of Bestiality by Obama and his Administration? So what's the deal, here? Obama accepts and promotes the pitch for those voters who would practice Bestiality, and then offers his dog up as what? Their sex symbol? In either case: Yuck!