Reconsidering Newt, and why we should NOT vote for the man. He believes in yielding to Global Socialism and a One World Governance.

Newt Gingrich says:

‘I’m for  Globalization…”

and advocates global job distribution over US exceptionalism. 

Consider it.

Newt Gingrich says @ 24-29 seconds:      http://youtu.be/T76lD4zV1bo

“Wilson’s  speeches still work.  I’m frankly a real politic’ Wilsonian." 

Consider it.

Wilson argued for not just a League of Nations, but a One World Governance that no nation nor probable combination of nations  could face or withstand it, and the power was to be based in Europe, while also extending a Monroe Doctrine.  

Woodrow Wilson's Address to the Senate of the United States:

"A World League for Peace"
January 22, 1917

“Mere agreements may not make peace secure. It will be absolutely necessary that a force be created as a guarantor of the permanency of the settlement so much greater than the force of any nation now engaged or any alliance hitherto formed or projected that no nation, no probable combination of nations could face or withstand it.

If the peace presently to be made is to endure, it must be a peace made secure by the organized major force of mankind.

The terms of the immediate peace agreed upon will determine whether it is a peace for which such a guarantee can be secured. The question upon which the whole future peace and policy of the world depends is this:

Is the present war a struggle for a just and secure peace, or only for a new balance of power? If it be only a struggle for a new balance of power, who will guarantee, who can guarantee, the stable equilibrium of the new arrangement?

Only a tranquil Europe can be a stable Europe. There must be, not a balance of power, but a community of power; not organized rivalries, but an organized common peace.”

And

“I am proposing, as it were, that the nations should with one accord adopt the doctrine of President Monroe as the doctrine of the world: that no nation should seek to extend its polity over any other nation or people, but that every people should be left free to determine its own polity, its own way of development, unhindered, unthreatened, unafraid, the little along with the great and powerful.

Woodrow Wilson: "Address to the Senate of the United States: "A World League for Peace",

" January 22, 1917. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley,

The American Presidency Project.

http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=65396.

“{T}he Monroe Doctrine is a declaration that there must be no territorial aggrandizement by any non-American power at the expense of any American power on American soil.”  - Teddy Roosevelt, First Annual Message to Congress, December 3, 1901

Newt Gingrich by his own words of conviction, can be honestly projected to "in practice", not only be "Wilsonian" (as he puts it), but to also premeditatedly  intend to model his aspired to Administration (should he become President) to be a neo-21st Century Franklin Delano Roosevelt Socialism infused into building and yielding to a Globalist One World Governance.  This later conclusion being based on Gingrich's love of FDR as his chief 20^th Century role model. 

Or more aptly put, the gist of Newt will be after he stops being a Chameleon is that he will say: “Drop dead Ronald Reagan and all you Constitutional Conservatives.  I hold an intellectual core conviction of a Progressive One World Socialism via the past speeches of Woodrow Wilson and FDR.  That's where my core conviction really is.”  That, it seems to me, is the gist of what Newt will say and be. 

Newt likes to also refer to the 4 Freedoms of FDR, which he also advocates.  The 4 Freedoms of FDR Newt refers to as seen in the hyper-linked US Government Norman Rockwell Propaganda Posters  of the time, are:

1)      freedom of religion,    http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/powers_of_persuasion/four_freedoms/images_html/save_freedom_worship.html  

2)      freedom of speech,  http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/powers_of_persuasion/four_freedoms/images_html/save_freedom_speech.html

3)      freedom from want,  http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/powers_of_persuasion/four_freedoms/images_html/freedom_from_want.html

4)       freedom from fear    http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/powers_of_persuasion/four_freedoms/images_html/freedom_from_fear.html

http://www.hbci.com/~tgort/fdr.htm

THE FOUR FREEDOMS :  {Part of the New world Order scheme}

Franklin Delano Roosevelt, January 6, 1941 to the 77^th Congress.

“The basic things expected by our people of their political and economic systems are simple. They are :

Equality of opportunity for youth and for others.

Jobs for those who can work.

Security for those who need it.

The ending of special privilege for the few.

The preservation of civil liberties for all.

The enjoyment of the fruits of scientific progress in a wider and constantly rising standard of living.

These are the simple, the basic things that must never be lost sight of in the turmoil and unbelievable complexity of our modern world. The inner and abiding straight of our economic and political systems is dependent upon the degree to which they fulfill these expectations.

…  In the future days which we seek to make secure, we look forward to a world founded upon four essential human freedoms.

The first is freedom of speech and expression --everywhere in the world.

The second is freedom of every person to worship God in his own way-- everywhere in the world.

The third is freedom from want, which, translated into world terms, means economic understandings which will secure to every nation a healthy peacetime life for its inhabitants --everywhere in the world.

The fourth is freedom from fear, which, translated into world terms, means a world-wide reduction of armaments to such a point and in such a thorough fashion that no nation will be in a position to commit an act of physical aggression against any neighbor --anywhere in the world.

That is no vision of a distant millennium. It is a definite basis for a kind of world attainable in our own time and generation. That kind of world is the very antithesis of the so-called "new order" of tyranny which the dictators seek to create with the crash of a bomb.

To that new order we oppose the greater conception --the moral order. A good society is able to face schemes of world domination and foreign revolutions alike without fear. Since the beginning of our American history we have been engaged in change, in a perpetual, peaceful revolution, a revolution which goes on steadily, quietly, adjusting itself to changing conditions without the concentration camp or the quicklime in the ditch. The world order which we seek is the cooperation of free countries, working together in a friendly, civilized society.

This nation has placed its destiny in the hands, heads and hearts of its millions of free men and women, and its faith in freedom under the guidance of God. Freedom means the supremacy of human rights everywhere."

It is a godless system where the Freedom of speech and worship is dictated to you as to what is acceptable speech and acceptable worship.  It must run contrary to the Judeo-Christian moral order.  The healthy peacetime life of the inhabitants may depend on killing off the many for wealth redistribution to the few.  The freedom from physical aggression by individual nations requires a One World Governance or Global Collective, in which one oligarchal power rules over all, and labels it as "Peace and Safety".

1 Thessalonians 5

 ¹But of the times and the seasons, brethren, ye have no need that I write unto you.

 ²For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night.

 ³For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them, as travail upon a woman with child; and they shall not escape.

 ⁴But ye, brethren, are not in darkness, that that day should overtake you as a thief.

 ⁵Ye are all the children of light, and the children of the day: we are not of the night, nor of darkness.

 ⁶Therefore let us not sleep, as do others; but let us watch and be sober.

 ⁷For they that sleep sleep in the night; and they that be drunken are drunken in the night.

 And I find it ironic, that the only ones advocating this Wealth Redistribution are radical Socialists, radical Communists, and the Occupy Wall Street derelicts and Anarchists.   The dedicated Anarchists are especially viewed by Obama as practicing Free Speech by raping women and leaving tons of strewn trash about at the Occupy rendezvous points; many of the same who were also throwing Molotov Cocktails or roll burning dumpsters at police and smash windows and vandalize at various G8, G20, or what-have-you Summits, while he and Nancy Pelosi and others of the Left are verbal bomb-throwers of someone who dared to peacefully hold up a sign for a few hours and went home.  To them, the Anarchists are their versions of role models and model citizens, which tells us that they have no moral compass. as FDR said, so say they:  To that new order we oppose ...the moral order.   Therefore, remember how corrupt they are, and be aware that their mask is just that...a mask.  They are to be treated with contempt, and to be run out of office and prosecuted for their felonious activities as an example of our seriousness to enforce existing US Laws on the books.

 Last week, Obama gave his "New Nationalism" speech in Kansas.  It went over like a lead balloon among Conservatives and Conservative Talk Radio.  We can also rebuke Obama and the Occupy movement by using Teddy's own words from 110 years ago this month.  

Indeed, Teddy Roosevelt answers the Occupy Wall Street Anarchists, the Obama – Soros- SEIU  sponsored  anti-Roosevelt movement that Obama and his friends organized, funded, and propagandize for. 

 {Excerpt}

First Annual Message
December 3, 1901

Anarchy is no more an expression of "social discontent" than picking pockets or wife-beating.

The anarchist, and especially the anarchist in the United States, is merely one type of criminal, more dangerous than any other because he represents the same depravity in a greater degree. The man who advocates anarchy directly or indirectly, in any shape or fashion, or the man who apologizes for anarchists and their deeds, makes himself morally accessory to murder before the fact. The anarchist is a criminal whose perverted instincts lead him to prefer confusion and chaos to the most beneficent form of social order. His protest of concern for workingmen is outrageous in its impudent falsity; for if the political institutions of this country do not afford opportunity to every honest and intelligent son of toil, then the door of hope is forever closed against him. The anarchist is everywhere not merely the enemy of system and of progress, but the deadly foe of liberty. If ever anarchy is triumphant, its triumph will last for but one red moment, to be succeeded, for ages by the gloomy night of despotism. 

For the anarchist himself, whether he preaches or practices his doctrines, we need not have one particle more concern than for any ordinary murderer. He is not the victim of social or political injustice. There are no wrongs to remedy in his case. The cause of his criminality is to be found in his own evil passions and in the evil conduct of those who urge him on, not in any failure by others or by the State to do justice to him or his. He is a malefactor and nothing else. He is in no sense, in no shape or way, a "product of social conditions," save as a highwayman is "produced" by the fact than an unarmed man happens to have a purse. It is a travesty upon the great and holy names of liberty and freedom to permit them to be invoked in such a cause. No man or body of men preaching anarchistic doctrines should be allowed at large any more than if preaching the murder of some specified private individual. Anarchistic speeches, writings, and meetings are essentially seditious and treasonable.

Theodore Roosevelt: "First Annual Message," December 3, 1901. Online by Gerhard Peters and John T. Woolley, The American Presidency Project. http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=29542

 

 

 Upon a closer examination of the Candidate Newt Gingrich, I must recommend -- as of today -- that he NOT be voted for in the GOP Primaries, nor should Mr. Gingrich  be a GOP Vice Presidential choice.  We need a Constitutional Conservative, not a Global Socialist.  Thank you.  -- Brianroy