Welcome! Jesus Christ is my LORD and Savior! Romans 10:9-10,13; John 3:16

[For EU visitors, I do not personally use cookies, but Google or any clickable link (if you choose to click on it) might. This is in compliance with mandatory EU notification]

I am a Natural Born United States Citizen with NO allegiance or citizenship to any nation but my own, and will use this site as a hobby place of sorts to present my own political and religious viewpoints, as a genuine Constitutional Conservative and a genuine Christian Conservative.

Thank you for coming.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Year of our LORD Jesus Christ
2017
-- As of January 20, 2017
A Sigh Of Relief With The Inauguration Of Donald John Trump as President of the United States of America, And Hope For A Prosperous Future For All United States Citizens (we who are a nation called "the melting pot of the world"). We shall be great and exceptionally great again.


Peace and Liberty. Semper Fidelis.









Sunday, October 30, 2011

Pamela Geller : “Truth is the New Hate Speech” according to Hate-mongering Liberals? Give me a break!





My Comment here:
Truth isn't just a hate-speech from Muslims, it is from anyone who is evil...especially and including the very vocal and seditious "Liberal Left" here in America.  Liberal, as it applies to the Leftist alleged Democrats, should be labeled in their application as synonymous with "vile, evil, wicked, hateful, venomous" people who wish to institute a totalitarian state (many especially espousing the hope of killing tens of millions of people who cease to be people in their eyes, but rather are nuisances to be gotten rid of),  etc.

The speech below is essentially the same as what was banned by billionairess Penny Pritzker and her Hyatt Regency.  I have personally met and had talked with Penny for what proved to be an eventful 5 or more minutes years ago; and her specifically referencing me to the Tulane Executive Summary (the Liberal Plan to restructure US Government into a variant of Marxist Communism) was very helpful for me to know from an Liberal Elite insider exactly what is happening in US Government now, and how this DNC driven vicious assault on the US Constitution and the Separation of Powers (from January 20, 2009 to present) was planned well before the 2006 national elections.  It isn't just Obama that needs to be removed and prosecuted for Treason.

 In a Politico interview called "Bill Daley: Unplugged", 
published on October 28, 2011,  Barack Hussein Obama II's Chief of Staff, Bill Daley, stated:

"...good times — well, better times — are possible before November 2012, Daley says. And all President Obama has to do to achieve this is make a startling end run around not just the Republicans but also the Democrats, in Congress.
All he has to do, Daley says, is operate in domestic affairs with the same speed, power and independence that he possesses in foreign and military affairs {like start an illegal / unConstitutional War in Libya and assassinate a US Citizen in Yemen before ever being tried and convicted in absentia}. 
That’s all.   ...   Let’s figure out what we can do [without Congress] and push the envelope [to creating the beginning of an Obama Dictatorship] on some of these things.   ... 
Let’s re-emphasize what powers we have! What we can do on our own! Push the envelope!"

In other words, Obama is knowingly being assisted to subvert and ignore the US Constitution, break down the Constitutional divisions of the three branches (Executive, Legislative, Judicial) of Federal Government known as "the separation of powers", and consolidate as much power as he can under his executive authority, while depending on apathy and no political or other public backlash on the part of Congress and the US Citizenry in order to accomplish these goals.  

Judge Andrew Napolitano at just before the 8 minute mark in his Newsmax interview, states that under US Federal Law, Obama is Impeachable now or at least indictable later, after he leaves office for the above parenthetically cited offenses.  




When Donald Trump pounded on Obama not having a genuine Birth Certificate and got fighting mad, it resonated with Americans.  When he went away because another forgery was released, this time a long form, he was wooed by a lucrative NBC Contract.  Who runs GE (and calls the shots to NBC as GE CEO) and has Obama's ear, and was able to woo Trump away?  The same guy who aided Iran in building its nuclear program, made GE take a loss in doing so, but was rewarded by Obama with a tax free year for GE for aiding the Shia Muslim led nation that vowed to build nukes, destroy the USA, and bathe the world in blood through the 12th Imam. 
The Iranians, like the Russians, accept that Obama is emasculating the USA to their benefit, and calling himself their friend, but it seems they are still too much in shock and natural mistrust to believe it.  Problem is, will the Muslims accept an alleged practicing  bi-sexual Muslim  as their strongest international ally? 
 Just asking. 

Thursday, October 27, 2011

Heritage Foundation and Ronald Reagan Videos: Sovereignty or Submission (with John Fonte) , "We Hold These Truths", "A Time for Choosing", Reagan's 1981 Economic Recovery Program



John FonteSenior Fellow and Director, Center for American Common Culture, The Hudson Institute
http://www.heritage.org/Events/2011/10/Sovereignty-or-Submission

In Sovereignty or Submission, John Fonte reveals how this troubling and fast-rising movement aims to subordinate American sovereignty. The global governance movement does not seek legitimacy in democracy, but rather in its own partisan interpretation of human rights. Globalists argue that the U.S. Constitution must conform to “evolving norms of international law.” While this idea may seem utopian, the efforts to implement it constitute a real threat to American democracy.




We Still Hold These Truths






"This is the issue of this election: whether we believe in our capacity for self-government or whether we abandon the American revolution and confess that a little intellectual elite in a far-distant Capitol can plan our lives for us better than we can plan them ourselves."     
-- Ronald Reagan, October 27, 1964



"A Time For Choosing "




------------------------------------------------------------------



Reagan on Economic Recovery  April 28, 1981 
                    ( Health and Wellness Comments: This was a month after the assassination attempt and President Reagan was still recovering.)




In 20/20 hindsight, had Congress passed an immediate 30% tax rate cut across the board right away (rather than being spread out over 3 years) the Economy would have roared back even faster and stronger.  Reduce the burden of Bureaucratic Regulations and Taxes, and enable -- rather than disable -- the American People to Independently make it more on their own.

Closing words of Ronald Reagan in the above video -
"All we need to do is act, and the time for action is now.  Thank you."


Wednesday, October 26, 2011

October 24, 2011 Britain votes to hand off Sovereignty to Brussels by a vote of 483 - 111 in the House of Commons.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/eu/8845541/EU-referendum-live.html

Voters know the tentacles of the EU intrude into more and more areas of our national life. They are sad and disillusioned about being fobbed off by the political elite. Increasingly, we have become run by Europe. I and millions in this country want to be in Britain and run by Britain. 
 ...I don't think we should underestimate the public. All the evidence shows that two thirds of the public want a say on this issue. I think they are quite capable of making their own minds up and telling us exactly what they think on this issue.
  - Tory MP (Bury North) David Nutall

It's worth repeating, though, that the referendum motion has been put before the House of Commons, not by a group of backbench Eurosceptics, but by the general public – or at least by the 100,000 people who used the new petition mechanism to trigger a parliamentary vote.--  MEP Daniel Hannan

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newsvideo/8847441/EU-referendum-motion-defeated-in-House-of-Commons.html

And yet, in spite of that knowledge, MP's like Adam Holloway offer the lamest excuse not to have voted to allow the Citizens of Great Britain the right to decide for themselves if they wished to remain in the European Union, or at least renegotiate their position.



In other words...with my head and my heart, I understand and feel your pain and I agree with you voters...but go screw yourselves, I have been paid off?  This wasn't a "free" vote...hint, hint?  

483 Members of the British Parliament voted to REFUSE to honor a referendum promise made by all three major British Political Parties on Monday, October 24, 2011. 

One, MP Adam Holloway,  is on tape hinting that he was bought off, and resigned a position he held as if to give himself political cover? 

  In effect, the vote of 483 members of the House of Commons was to essentially cast off British Sovereignty and offer the promise to hand it over to Brussels (be it to the European Union Oligarchy or some future singe foreign EU Dictator). 

Britain is now suffering virtually the same Government corruption and betrayal that the USA faced under the Nancy Pelosi - Harry Reid-and Usurper Barack Obama Congress in 2009 to 2010. The difference is, the US Traitors voted for our eventual annihilation by their nefarious support for a British Subject at birth -- the usurper of the US Presidency, Barry Obama, a virulent anti-US Communist-Socialist -- and the British Parliament voted for assimilation and a handing off of their rights to self-determination to unknown other powers.

 111 British Parliamentary Patriots stood their ground and voted for Liberty, and the chance for the people of Great Britain to tell the EU,
"Thanks for inviting us, but no thanks, we can make it on our own."

It is a fact that the USA, Britain, Canada, Mexico, Australia, New Zealand can effectively form their own coalition and be so resource independent, that they can tell the EU and the rest of the world (with the exception of Israel as an ally and trade partner), "Thanks, but no thanks.  We can prosper on our own very much, thank you.  If you wish to trade with us, fine.  If not, that's up to you."   We can scale back very nicely from most of the rest of the world, and keep our international trade based on the US Dollar (which most of the rest of the world is gradually dumping because of Obama and his perfidious sabotage acts against its value anyway).

 Glenn Beck sends the Conservatives who voted against handing off British Sovereignty, and restore British Independence and Dignity, an open letter of support.  I concur. 



We aren't just losing freedom here in the USA, it is happening everywhere in the "Free World".

Be alert and be informed. 

Put your trust and confidence, not in man, but in GOD through Jesus Christ the LORD of Heaven and Earth.

Seek ye the LORD, all ye meek of the earth, which have wrought his judgment; 
seek righteousness, seek meekness:
it may be ye shall be hid             [taken up in the Rapture]

in the day of the LORD's anger.
(Zephaniah 2:3) 

Amen.

Tuesday, October 25, 2011

Obama Unilateral Disarmament of the USA to see it obliterated, on track: B-53 bunker buster nukes no longer extant...shredded by Obama's orders.






As I have shown before by the Obama signed unilateral START TREATY with Russia, the Shia Manchurian Barack Hussein Obama is currently and unilaterally shredding our nukes, with a possible plan to reduce the USA to only 1 actual nuke and 1549 (what would be redefined under Obama as nuke equivalents when only) "launchers."
http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/06/while-obama-start-strips-usa-could-orly.html

Meanwhile Obama per the specifics of the very Treaty he negotiated with Russia in Russia favor -- Obama  gives Russia our most advanced and in depth state of the art  nuclear missile technology
http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/06/retired-general-vallely-states-that-he.html

via the Russian Communist Cold War Asset  -- now Department of Defense Secretary  -- Leon Panetta.
http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/06/cia-chief-leon-panetta-de-facto-us.html

Panetta is actively, nefariously,  and currently,  a co-traitor with Obama against all of us in the USA to see this nation's population suffer an eventual utter annihilation by entirely emasculating our nuclear defenses.   We are now on the fast track toward that goal.

Be informed and be warned.


And put your trust and confidence, not in man, but in GOD through Jesus Christ the LORD.  Amen and Hallelujah!














Peace.


Brianroy's Tax Rate Solution (in preference and in opposition to the Cain 999 and Perry 20% Flat Tax Plans).

For three posts I have come down hard on the Herman Cain Plan, based on the principal that it is too harsh on the poor.  Since those posts, Governor Rick Perry

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/gop-presidential-primary/189527-rick-perry-offers-20-percent-flat-tax-option
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204777904576651330270547222.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_RIGHTTopCarousel_1
offered an equally abysmal flat tax of 20% with an opt out option.

The Scripture causes born-again believers to REMEMBER THE POOR when they judge righteous judgement.  Both Herman and Rick have forgotten this.

"Open thy mouth.
Judge Righteously:
and plead the cause of the Poor and Needy."   - Proverbs 31:9 (See also Isaiah 59:5-8.)

Let that suffice for now.   

On November 17, 2010, I proposed a more effective basic tax plan than Herman Cain or Rick Perry
http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2010/11/allen-west-interviewed-by-recent-co-us.html

The article reads as thus:
We need more "cream of the crop" articulate and intelligent Politically Conservative US Military Officers and Veterans of recent conflicts like Allen West to be elected to Congress, be our Protect and Defend the US and its Constitution "war hawks" voices there, and use intelligent arguments and "no surrender"  determination to make the changes necessary to preserve our US Constitution, US Sovereignty, and our Republic.

Mr. West, if you or any other Conservative Congressman reads this...in an accelerated version of Art Laffer's successful tax rate reduction and boost to the US economy in the 1980s, I propose this:

May the New Congress also propose, for across all tax brackets:
 a 20% Federal Income Tax Rate Reduction  for 2011,
 a 10% further Tax Rate Reduction for 2012,
and a Tax Rate FREEZE at 0% for 2013. 

I would also propose that in 2014, for income earners under $50,000, that there would be NO Increase;
and
for those making between $50,000.01 and $100,000.00, that there be a a no greater increase than 3% to 5%, but that the lesser or greater rate within that income bracket be determined by Congress in the year 2013 specified into the language of the bill."


I would call this above basic proposal as Option Plan A.  The intent was that while those with incomes above $100,000 could be returned to current tax rates in a Fourth year of implementation, those earning exactly $100,000 or less a year cannot be so increased under normal circumstances (unless a later Congress scraps the plan).


I now offer a "Pay as you are Able" Option Plan B  as an alternative if the RNC and TEA Party dislikes the above.  


In both plans, I retain the Internal Revenue Service, and allow it to be streamlined to 2008 or lower personnel levels.

Under my plan, you can not take more than 4 (that's four) $5,000 deductions.  Non-profit donations of $5,000 and up will count simply as $5,000 with a non-profit organization receipt.  No more than 4 dependents may be applied to income.  If you have 5 dependents, you may only claim 4.  If you have 4 dependents and give over $5,000 to your non-profit Church or Synagogue or registered non-profit charity, you may claim only 4 exemptions, for a total of $20,000 maximum payable adjusted income reported reduction.  There will be no other major deductions in this tax plan.  There will of course be the retention of various  business exemptions such as being paid IRS miles rate, such as at 51 cents a mile, that will not be reported as income that will remain in place.  Because of the specifics that can be involved, I need an Internal Revenue Service to make these Plans workable.   The top dollar rate is rounded down in each category. 


INCOME                                            TAX RATE


18,000 - 24,999                                    1%        $180 - 249            
25,000 - 29,999                                    2%        $500 - 599
30,000 - 39,999                                    3%        $900 - 1199
40,000 - 49,999                                    4%        $1600 - 1999   
50,000 - 59,999                                    5%         etc.
60,000 - 69,999                                    6%
70,000 - 79,999                                    7%
80,000 - 89,999                                    8%
90,000 - 99,999                                    9%
100,000 - 139,999                                10%
140,000 - 179,999                                11%
180,000 - 219,999                                12%
220,000 - 299,999                                13%
300,000 - 399,999                                14%
400,000 - 499,999                                15%
500,000 - 599,999                                16%
600,000 - 699,999                                17%
700,000 - 799,999                                18%
800,000 - 899,999                                19%
900,000 - 999,999                                20%


1,000,000 - 1,999,999                           24%
2,000,000 - 2,999,999                           25%
3,000,000 - 3,999,999                           26%
4,000,000 - 4,999,999                           27%
5,000,000 - 5,999,999                           28%
6,000,000 - 6,999,999                           29%
7,000,000 - 7,999,999                           30%
8,000,000 - 8,999,999                           31%
9,000,000 - 9,999,999                           32%

10,000,000 - 49,999,999                       35%
50,000,000 - 99,999,999                       40%
100,000,000 - 249,999,999                    45%
250,000,000 +                                      50%


We should accompany this tax rate plan with:
1) a call for a Smaller and more efficient Federal Government Workforce (exempting the Military);
2) a faster means to cut through Bureaucracy at all levels;
3) a removal of pork spending altogether
4) a reduction of all US Federal pensions to no greater than $60,000 a year effective immediately (with only the Presidency as the exception -- see #6 below)
5) a removal of all Congressional pensions to those with less than 20 years service
6) a reduction of Federal wages to a cap of  $120,000 including the US Presidency (which alone will have a wage and then effective immediately pension of $120,000 annum plus the usual Secret Service protection upon completion of term); and
7) a freeze on Federal pay-scales of all employees for at least the next 3 years.

       If Congress cannot live on a $120,000 a year income, they need to move to a smaller house and live more respectably or get out of Congress; because if they are so unworthy as to be able to live within those means, they have no business making budgets for the rest of the Country.
   
This is my plan.  I hope the Presidential Candidates will use it.  Even Herman Cain is welcome to it, even though I at this time very much prefer
Michele Bachmann and Newt Gingrich 
as my choice for President and Vice-President.   -- Brianroy

 [ October 28, 2011 -   The Corporate tax rate was intentionally left out above, because my Primary contention was with the Individual Tax Rate and that there be no National Sales Tax created at Point of Purchase, etc.   


The Corporate Tax Rate I would propose is 12.5% for businesses under $250,000,000 annual sales, and 15% for those above.   There would be a 2.5% penalty for exporting US jobs overseas, and a 2.5% reward incentive for taking overseas jobs and investing them here in America with US workers.  This worker re-investment credit would obligate the employer to create an average workweek of 36 hours per week for 50 weeks of the year.  There would also be another 2.5% start-up credit for three years if the labor investment exceeds 10% of the labor force of the company being invested within any or a combination of the 50 States of the United States of America.  In other words, an International US Company with 100,000 employees world-wide with 50,000 overseas jobs, relocates 10,000 overseas jobs back into the USA gets a 2.5% additional tax-rate deduction for three years as long as they keep and maintain the same or greater labor force in the US at the new employment rate (by example now 60,000 in the above example) during the entirety of each year for up to three years, and by keeping the hours of those employees at 36 hours a week for at least 50 weeks a year, the tax rate will be 10% for a $250,000,000+ annual sales company, and 7.5% for those companies with less than $250,000,000 annual sales.


This tax rate can drop even further by an additional 2.5% by being in the "endangered industries" list.  Manufacturing, textile, steel mills, and certain other industries would be subject to an additional tax rate cut of 2.5% for up to 5 years, but only if the starting wages are $14.00 an hour or above (tentative wage number at this point) and maintained.   

Most all other business deductions will dissipate, except for EPA compliance, and a Reagan Era deregulation of unnecessary regulations will also need to accompany this Corporate Tax Plan as well.  For example, Congress will have to rewrite the laws as to the intensity and length and costs of environmental impact reports in regard to Federal Land leases, so that start-up can be in as little as 30 - 45 days from submission for approval to approval under a tiered inspection, interested parties and impact report system.     


I hope this covers the Corporate Tax question.  Thanks.]



Friday, October 21, 2011

Exposing the Fraud of Herman Cain's 999 Plan - Part 3


 In Part 1, I raised the cry of alarm of the intensified taxation on the poor and others, 999 allows businesses to virtually exempt themselves out of all taxes by the moving of all profits into 999 exemptions of  business "expenses" and "profit-sharing". 
http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/10/why-cain-is-wrong-choice-based-on-his-9.html


In Part 2,
http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/10/herman-cains-999-plan-hypocrisy-and.html
I gave examples of Poverty and Poor incomes on which someone making only $10,830 now will owe a Federal Income Tax of $974.70 and either an individual or household of 4 making only $22,050 a year will suddenly owe the figure of $1,984.50.  I also addressed how Cain shifts the argument how that State Sales Taxation remaining and a New National Sales Tax on new goods only can actually increase the price of goods by at least 30%, IS a Tax which Cain denies as if Apples and Oranges, and then blow away the Apples and Oranges analogy because these are effectually similar.  Both Apples and Oranges come from deciduous trees, both are a type of fruit, etc. So to say we are discussing alien or dissimilar concepts in analyzing the 999 National Sales Tax as a "Tax" are dissimilar as Apples and Oranges,  is a intentional attempt to lie to your faces on the part of Herman Cain, even though the 999 tax is far more invasive and duplicates itself upon the same product multiple times (or each time it is sold as a new good and changes hands).

When the Internal Revenue Service was created, it began as a 7% tax.  It increased into a monster taxation that went up as high as 70% taxation on top earners.  At the Foxnews Republican Debate, Cain lied and said there was no chance for manipulation down the road to increase that amount on anybody.



 Under the US Constitution and the Law, including two US Supreme Court Cases, what Cain represented was untrue.

In 1810, in Fletcher v. Peck, 10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 87 (1810)  http://supreme.justia.com/us/10/87/case.html    the Supreme Court states  @ 87

“The principle asserted is that one legislature is competent to repeal any act which a former legislature was competent to pass, and that one legislature cannot abridge the powers of a succeeding legislature. The correctness of this principle so far as it respects general legislation cannot be controverted. But if an act be done under a law, a succeeding legislature cannot undo it. The past cannot be recalled by the most absolute power.”


This was view was upheld in Reichelderfer v. Quinn, 287 U.S. 315 (1932) @ 315-316 http://supreme.justia.com/us/287/315/case.html    in which lands that were perpetually set aside in the District of Columbia’s “Rock Creek Park”, by an act of Congress, had a law passed that allowed a fire station to be built upon it, and was so challenged.  Again, any Congress succeeding another Congress can repeal or Amend US Law in accordance with the guidelines within the US Constitution.  Just because one Congress intends something set for perpetuity does not make it so.  However, under the Democrats and Obama since January 2009, even the guidelines and fencing barriers of the US Constitution have been ignored, scorned at, and subverted to the clear implication of Treason.  Cain merely extends and builds upon Obama's Constitutional disdain, it seems to me. 


In October 2011, Cain's tune was "modified" from a position of 999 never being increased by a future Congress to an Obama-similar "blame the victim" mentality.  Herman Cain wrote to this effect, that if Congress increases that amount, it was your own damn fault for allowing those people to be elected to office in the first place -- i.e., he blames the victims of his plan.

In Cain's own words in his own World Net Daily article which he wrote, he states under Claim #2:

"If you don't want the rates raised, don't elect politicians who will raise them."
That was above statement and position by Cain was published on October 16, 2011, and contradicts his circa September 22, 2011 debate absolute that 999 would not see a spike in taxes less than a month earlier.  Flapjacks anyone?
on October 21, 2011 through James Rosen reports a Cain’s latest lie to the American People over 999:  “Stung by criticism that his signature "9-9-9" economic plan would saddle America's poorest citizens with a disproportionate share of the country's tax burden, GOP presidential candidate Herman Cain announced some new features to the plan, even as he insisted they have been included in his campaign literature all along.”  

See also:
http://thehill.com/video/campaign/189059-cain-says-those-under-poverty-line-exempted-from-9-9-9-income-tax
"If you are at or below the poverty level, your plan isn't 9-9-9, it's 9-0-9," Cain said. "In other words, you don't pay that middle income tax."

See also:

  Cain stated to the effect that those individuals earning below the Poverty Line would not pay the Federal Income Tax and it would be a 9-0-9 plan for them.   Oh Goody.  Prices on everything booms an average of 30% on groceries, rent and other costs (including utilities) goes up instantaneously, and the poor (young or old -- White, Black, Hispanic, or what have you) are supposed to do what?  Sigh in relief?


I say, "Read his 999 Plan for yourself.  It is skimpy and subject to interpretation, both now and in the future."   Cain sure talks smooth...but read his plan and compare them to his words on the "stump".



The 999 Brochure issued by the Cain for President group is at
http://www.hermancain.com/docs/999-for-web-10-12.pdf
 
The essence of the plan in detail is to be quoted as thus:

"UNITE, never DIVIDE; UNITED around ECONOMIC GROWTH

  • When one party is so focused on spending so that the other must focus on cutting, we must unite around economic growth
  • Unite income tax payers with payroll taxpayers so we all pull for low rates
  • Unite those wanting to eliminate deductions with those seeking lower rates.
  • Unite the Flat-Taxers with the Fair-Taxers

Phase One

Our current economic crisis calls for bold action to truly stimulate the economy and Renew America back to its greatness. The 9-9-9 Plan gets Washington D.C. out of the business of picking winners and losers, using the tax code to dole out favors, and dividing the country with class warfare. It is fair, simple, transparent and efficient. It taxes everything once and nothing twice. It taxes the broadest possible base at the lowest possible rates. It is neutral with respect to savings and consumption,capital and labor, imports and exports and whether companies pay dividends or retain earnings.

9% Business Flat Tax

    • Gross income less all purchases from other U.S. located businesses, all capital investment, and net exports.
    • Empowerment Zones will offer deductions for the payroll of those employed in the zone

9% Individual Flat Tax.

    • Gross income less charitable deductions.
    • Empowerment Zones will offer additional deductions for those living and/or working in the zone.

9% National Sales Tax.

    • Unlike a state sales tax, which is an add-on tax that increases the price of goods and services, this is a replacement tax. It replaces taxes that are already embedded in selling prices. By replacing higher marginal rates in the production process with lower marginal rates, marginal production costs actually decline, which will lead to prices being the same or lower, not higher.

Economic Impact

    • According to former Reagan Treasury official Gary Robbins, of Fiscal Associates, the 9-9-9 Plan will expand GDP by $2 trillion, create 6 million new jobs, increase business investment by one third, and increase wages by 10%.

9-9-9 Plan: Summary

  • Removes all payroll taxes and unites all tax payers
  • Provides the least incentive to evade taxes and the fewest opportunities to do so
  • Lifts a $430 billion dead-weight burden on the economy due to compliance, enforcement, collection, etc…
  • Is fair, simple, efficient, neutral, and transparent
  • Ends nearly all deductions and special interest favors
  • Features zero tax on capital gains and repatriated profits
  • Exports leave our shores without the Business Tax or the Sales Tax embedded in their cost, making them world class competitive. Imports are subject to the same taxation as domestically produced goods, leveling the playing field.
  • Lowest marginal rates on production
  • Kills the Death Tax
  • Allows immediate expensing of business investments
  • Eliminates double taxation of dividends
  • Increases capital formation which aids capital availability for small businesses
  • Increased capital per worker drives productivity and wage growth
  • Features a platform to launch properly structured Empowerment Zones to renew our inner cities
  • The pro-growth, pro-job, pro-export economic policies of the 9-9-9 PLAN equals a strong dollar policy

Phase 2 – The Fair Tax

Amidst a backdrop of the economic renewal created by the 9-9-9 Plan, I will begin the process of educating the American people on the benefits of continuing the next step to the Fair Tax.

  • Ultimately replaces individual and corporate income taxes
  • Ends the IRS as we know it and repeals the 16th Amendment"


So where is that "Poverty Level Exemption"?   IT ISN'T THERE!!!

The only ones who suggest the need for a poverty exemption is the Scoring Company "Fiscal Associates, Inc.", 
not Herman. 

It is one phrase by Fiscal Associates, Inc. that writes on page 6 this:  
"Relief for lower income taxpayers will inevitably be part of any tax reform."

It is the Scoring Company “Fiscal Associates, Inc.” in September 2011 that thus makes a presumption that is NOT in the 999 plan, and expects to be followed in spite of the 999 plan. And Herman then pretends that he wrote the exclusion only after coming under heavy criticism and heretofore denying the privilege.  How convenient, Herman.

  In fact, as I stated before, empowerment zones (once making it to legislation, if it ever gets that far) could be defined as only country club ownership housing zones.  

 If Herman wishes to claim credit for the Scoring Company report, as stated or alluded to on page 8 of the Scoring Card pdf., then all housing mortgages, all rents, all food and gas, the rental value of buildings owned by nonprofit institutions, the output of the nonprofit and government sectors all gets the 9% national sales tax as well as the poor.  Only Consumables as business expenses, i.e., be they perceived or rewarded as executive lunches - meals - catering or furnishing the water cooler (and the like) are to exempt from the (999 Cain proposed) National Sales Tax. 

Now my question to the TEA (Taxed Enough Already) Independents, the Republican Primary Voters, and the whomever Financial Donors to Presidential Campaigns is this: Why in the Hell would you support someone whom is little or no more than Herman "Barack Hussein Obama" Cain of the Republican Party?  Are you really so eager to end the Republic of the United States or aid its demise, by enabling Cain to economically finish off America as an Obama term #2?  

In parts 1 and 2 I have shown how that  Cain has repeatedly lied about 999 not raising taxes on seniors and the poor.  And here in part 3, we see that this is exacerbated not only by the very fact of the existence of an additional self-duplicating National 9% Sales Tax (exactly contrary to his brochure claim) that will not only make them pay that much more for food and gas, but also a Fiscal Scoring Report he claims for himself that will necessarily tack increase of another 9% or more cost increase on their rent also.   The wording is 9% of the "rental" VALUE of the building used BY NON-PROFITS -- and if the wording bounces around because of semantics to cite this as the Non-Profits alone paying 9% on the rental value and all Private and Corporate Property Owners are to pay a 9% annual tax on the property value of current holdings...hence, it was the value of the building is what was meant...and the building is valued at $500,000, that's $45,000 a year in a Cain 999 National Sales Tax, Sherlock.  It's called a Government Ownership of virtually all properties overnight plan that might as well be right out of the Bilderberg Society and the execution plans for the takeover of the New World Order.  It is THAT nefarious / evil.  

Still, as for the Non-Profit (be it a Church, a Synagogue, some Food Bank, or what have you) is either renting or owns (the wording is questionable in the 999 intent here) a $500,000 building, and the rent charged is  $2,000 a month, there will be an additional payment of $2,160 that will be owed to the Federal Government in taxes per year under Cain's 999 plan.  But who does the assessing for tax debt, because it says "rental value"?  What if the IRS says the actual taxable value is $5,000 a month, and you either charge or pay (as the non-profit organization) "market value" at $2,000 a month?  You now owe even twice the original estimate, a whopping $4,500 in new taxes you never owed before, and it probably won't matter if you are a Church or Synagogue or Private Individual -- Cain wishes to usurp the Constitution, and by logic, must utilize the illegal Super-Committee which by claim is presumed to be able to pass this new taxation/revenue measure, and he will necessarily ignore the other 523 members of Congress and the 3/4ths of the States, and expect the Media and everyone else to just go along, the same as they have done for the Usurper of the Presidency, that United Kingdom and Colonies Citizen at birth, Barack Hussein Obama (someone who fails the 100% sole US allegiance of parentage at birth and a US soil birth in order to be a US Natural Born Citizen -- which Obama is NOT, being absent a US Citizen Father, and being 100% absent Court introduced proof of US birth documents as well...having only conjecture referenced by his lawyers). 

 By my reckoning, it seems to me that Cain is virtually indistinguishable from a Democrat Socialist infiltrator with Fascistic proclivities in the 999 plan.  To me, Cain is a Democratic Socialist (a wolf) in Conservative Christian Republican (sheep's) clothing.  Bachmann was right how that Cain's 999 plan is really to be likened to an upside down 666 plan, and that the Devil is in the details. 

Cain's 999 plan is totally unacceptable, because it is a means to indeed not only oppress, but ENSLAVE the poor and many tens of millions of others of our Free Republic into despotism and Government ordered indentured servitude,and it is a moral and civil wrong that must be legally and peacefully be exposed and opposed.    That's my input.

[Last edited on September 22, 2011 circa  :958am -  Pacific]

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Price Gouging by the Major Oil Companies at the Gas Pumps 2011 Now All Too Transparent

In 2010, the major Oil Companies made quite a lot of profits, and those on the Left have been complaining about these profits as if they have a genuine issue.  In past years, the only time the price gouging occurred was when the Oil Companies conspired to increase gas prices at the refinery levels by an extra 50 cents a gallon from May to September in the summers of 2005 and 2007.  These increases more than paid for industry wide C-Store gas station retro-fits, EPA and Air Quality Pump upgrades, refinery upgrades and rebuilding of refinery and other industry infrastructure.  In other words, rather than take it out of profits or move the bottom line, the consumer was forced to pay for new industry upgrades through the nose.

In the meantime, there were massive station sell-offs of Company owned Company operated (COCO) gas station units (e.g., such as British Petroleum selling off its recently or within several years acquired Corporate takeover stations from the Atlantic Richfield Co). and massive industry layoffs at the convenience store level, in which about half or less than half were temporarily re-hired.  In California, the majority of COCO to Franchise station sales appears to have gone to foreign and recent Immigrants from Asia and the Middle East investors.  But that is another issue at present.

The graph from the US Dept. of Energy, NYMEX showing the last 10 year pattern between prices of regular unleaded gas at the pump on average nationally and the price of a gallon of light sweet crude tells the situation IMMEDIATELY.




In that 10 1/2 year graph, at the above link, along with the graph of 30 months from the Energy Information Administration 


and dates of and amounts of crude oil prices for the last 5 plus years from the New York Stock Exchange


we see a pattern of corruption arise.

 For over 10 years, the average industry variable between a gallon of processed light sweet crude and a gallon of gas at the pump was only 75 cents a gallon.  Taxes added on top of the cost of a station's purchase price from the refinery, so only the profit variable of 8 to 24 cents per gallon are effected by the owners of the gas stations themselves.  When price wars happen in times of a price gouge, such as an agreed to Big Oil  industry increase of 50 cents above market variable, some price wars may show a -16 cents per gallon cost on the books, but the actual is the 75 cent per gallon variable + 34 cents per gallon price gouge mark up.  And when these events do happen, they will require either a regional manager or Vice President approval, and be temporary, generally less than 2 weeks in price competition nature (most often never extending more than 4 or 5 days and to designated communities or sub-community locations to pump up traffic flow as if an "advertising" expense within the Corporate mindset.)  Or so, that's how it USED to be.

The variable between light sweet crude per gallon and gasoline sold at the pump remained fairly constant in 2010 an industry standard of a 75 cent variable for most of the year, and reflected the average expected industry price variable used over the last 10 years.  At 2010 year’s end, the variable of the joint industry of Big Oil at the Gas Stations or Consumer Purchase Points (CPP)'s jumped to a $1.00 variable.  

In 2011, maintaining a consistent average of about a $1.00 variable, in May 2011 following the release of the forged Obama Birth Certificate, the oil industry began price gouging the consumer.  Again, the Oil Industry only truly began price gouging the US Consumer without residual upgrades or benefit to the Industry following the clear and obvious Obama Long Form Forgery.  In other words, they factually know Obama isn't legit in the Presidency, and are now taking the consumer to task to fund their greed on a gradual increasing basis.


Beginning with a $1.25 variable in May 2011, the gap increased in profiteering for the Oil Industry to a $1.62 a gallon variable between light sweet crude prices and pump prices on average nationally.  In other words, Exxon Mobil and the rest of the oil/gas industry gouged the consumers an extra .87 cents a gallon on average, beating their COCO Stores gas pump EPA upgrades / renovation and refinery fund raisers of a $1.25 a gallon variable in May – September 2005, and again at the same $1.25 a gallon variable in May to September 2007.   And again, the CPP price by these examples already has the taxes and local station markup of 8 to 24 cents a gallon factored in. 

No one single oil company can do this "price fixing" or "price gouging" on their own.  All prices are fixed together, and are set by those companies owning the Refineries.  The refineries are own by BIG OIL.  

 Instead of a price war of dropping to even 25 cents lower per gallon than the next competitor down the street, the prices remain fixed, because the base charge that is paid at the pump by the consumers comes from the refineries.  Even the franchises must approximate their prices to a profit of 8 cents to 24 cents a gallon on average for gas sales, usually creating profit variables across the grades to increase revenue (such as 8 cents profit on 87 grade, 10 cents profit on 89 grade, and 14 cents profit on 91 grade, for example). 

Again, that  being the case, exactly who controls the refineries in order to “set” the gasoline prices charged at the pump?  And every couple years we get the same old tired lying that “no one controls the gas prices conspiratorially, they just happen by market forces”.  Excuse me, but the same or approximate same price crude in all refineries cannot be all happenstance price gouging / profiteering at the same ratio all around the country at the same time without coordination and inter-industry collusion.  That’s a conspiracy to price fix to the circumvention of normal competition and free-flow capitalism.

On October 19, 2011 AAA
http://fuelgaugereport.aaa.com/?redirectto=http://fuelgaugereport.opisnet.com/index.asp listed a graph showing October 1, 2010 to October 1, 2011.

You will notice that the price variable between Crude and wholesale to Franchises jumps from a 37 cent variable to a slightly more than $1.00 variable on August 1, 2011, and drops back to about 90 cents variable mid September 2011, before settling to about 84 to 86 cents on October 1, 2011.  The Crude to Consumer variable begins at about 82 cents on October 1, 2010, and by mid to late September 2011, the variable spikes over $1.70 a gallon in the variable.  In the AAA example, the overcharge is around 95 cents per gallon at the CPP (Consumer Purchase Points -- i.e., at the pump).   




For last year, for 2010 ExxonMobil reported profits, after paying shareholders 22% on their stock investments, a profit of 30.5 billion dollars.  (p. 4 of pdf. link)

DutchShell report 20.474 billion dollars  in profits 

 By comparison, Exxon and other BIG OIL is on track, with the new price gouging shared conspiratorially with the rest of the industry (as is apparent in the graphs) to increase last years profit margin between 87-88% minus sales tax per gallon, or around 80% on average.   In other words, ExxonMobil is on track for a $54,000,000,000 gross profit year for 2011, and DutchShell for a $36,000,000,000 gross profit year for 2011.

Now if they only report in the first quarter of next year that they had no net increase in profits compared to this year, they will have squirreled away and mis-reported profits of almost $1 for every $1 profit reported.  But that is an if for now, and a "let's wait and see".

I hope that economists who have greater resources than I, can do a more thorough analysis, and expose the Industry wide Price Gouging at the Refinery Level that is happening right now in the Oil/Gas  Industry in 2011 against the US Consumer.  And as to the Price Gouging, if misreported in 2012 as less than record profits, such  may warrant an IRS investigation for Corporate Tax and Corporate Income Fraud.  Peace.