Welcome! Jesus Christ is my LORD and Savior! Romans 10:9-10,13; John 3:16

[For EU visitors, I do not personally use cookies, but Google or any clickable link (if you choose to click on it) might. This is in compliance with mandatory EU notification]

I am a Natural Born United States Citizen with NO allegiance or citizenship to any nation but my own, and will use this site as a hobby place of sorts to present my own political and religious viewpoints, as a genuine Constitutional Conservative and a genuine Christian Conservative.

Thank you for coming.
In the Year of our LORD Jesus Christ
-- As of January 20, 2017
A Sigh Of Relief With The Inauguration Of Donald John Trump as President of the United States of America, And Hope For A Prosperous Future For All United States Citizens (we who are a nation called "the melting pot of the world"). We shall be great and exceptionally great again.

It is likely that the entries to this blog will be less frequent than in years past. I do intend to keep this blog active, and to offer insightful information and/or opinion (and sometimes humor and/or entertainment on occasion) when I do post.

Peace and Liberty. Semper Fidelis.

Saturday, January 29, 2011

Russia Today brags of New Russian Missile, while US forbidden by Obama START Signature on counter-development

[Last edited and updated on January 30, 2011]

A follow-up video to the Obama emasculization of US Nuclear Capabilities or unilateral START Treaty agreement

that the traitor to the United States*
and non-Constitutional (not being a de facto nor a de jure US Natural Born Citizen at birth)**
Usurper of the US presidency signed,
 as I covered at:

From Russia Today,


Essentially, it is Stealth poly-shell technology applied directly to the warheads with a new thermal avoidance technology applied to the guidance system in the warhead itself. 

Whether this allows for hundreds of multiple target retaskings based altitude, trajectory, etc., on a new warhead guidance system containing either  a geo-thermal map reading of  what targets have already been obliterated, or can readjust to avoid missiles and jets based on heat detection within a certain range, we just don't know as yet. 

The point is, the Russians have taken an old system and upgraded its nuclear warheads to a Stealth technology, while a Usurper to the US Presidency has intentionally tied our diplomatic treaty and US National Security hands to clearly aid and abet any foreign power to have not only a First-Strike capablity, but to have an unhindered and minimal retaliatory consequence First-Strike capability. 

*           Haig v. Agee, 453 U.S. 280 (1981) @ 307
(citing Aptheker v. Sec’y of State, 378 U.S. 500 (1964) @ 509); accord Cole v. Young, 351 U.S. 536(1956) @ 546.

It is "obvious and unarguable" that no governmental interest is more compelling than the security of the Nation. Aptheker v. Secretary of State, 378 U.S. at 378 U. S. 509; accord, Cole v. Young, 351 U. S. 536, 351 U. S. 546 (1956); see Zemel, supra, at 381 U. S. 13-17.

By intentionally signing an agreement to emasculate the US Nuclear Arsenal unilaterally, and to cease developing new technologies in this same arms field, Obama betrayed the National Security Interests of the United States.

**              "No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."
Constitution of the United States of America, Article 2, section 1, Clause 5

"The burden of establishing a delegation of power to the United States,
or the prohibition of power to the States,
is upon those making the claim."
[i.e., upon those being President to prove they are Natural Born Citizens and Constituionally eligible.]
Bute v. Illinois, 333 US 640 (1948) @ 653

“The mother's relation is verifiable from the birth itself and is documented by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses to the birth.”  @54

" In the case of the mother, the relation is verifiable from the birth itself. The mother's status is documented in most instances by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses who attest to her having given birth.” @ 62

Nguyen v. INS, 533 US 53 (2001) @ 54,62

See also:


No comments:

Post a Comment