Welcome! Jesus Christ is my LORD and Savior! Romans 10:9-10,13; John 3:16

[For EU visitors, I do not personally use cookies, but Google or any clickable link (if you choose to click on it) might. This is in compliance with mandatory EU notification]

I am a Natural Born United States Citizen with NO allegiance or citizenship to any nation but my own, and will use this site as a hobby place of sorts to present my own political and religious viewpoints, as a genuine Constitutional Conservative and a genuine Christian Conservative.

Thank you for coming.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Year of our LORD Jesus Christ
2019
-- As of January 20, 2017
A Sigh Of Relief With The Inauguration Of Donald John Trump as President of the United States of America, And Hope For A Prosperous Future For All United States Citizens (we who are a nation called "the melting pot of the world"). We shall be great and exceptionally great again.

It is likely that the entries to this blog will be less frequent than in years past. I do intend to keep this blog active, and to offer insightful information and/or opinion (and sometimes humor and/or entertainment on occasion) when I do post.


Peace and Liberty. Semper Fidelis.










Thursday, July 1, 2010

Obama confesses his citizenship is based on the faith of others, not blood or birth? Is anyone listening?

[Updated July 2, 2010]

Being an American is not a matter of blood or birth, it’s a matter of faith,” Obama declared...

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/07/01/obama_being_an_american_not_a_matter_of_blood_or_birth.html



Or in other words...Obama is saying to all Americans:

"I don't have a US Long Form birth certificate, my Kenyan Father was not an American, I probably wasn't even born in America, and who cares...so long as YOU have the faith I am an American Citizen, that's all it takes."


Is that a fair summary of what he said?


Really? Now he openly admits it and flaunts his alien status as an "in your face" taunt? Does any one else take it that way, or what?








Who is Obama?


1) He is someone who could care less about Russian spies on US soil. He therefore passive-aggressively supports Russian spies, but if they get caught, he isn't either for or against it.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/106255-white-house-spy-arrests-wont-hurt-us-russia-relations

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/us_and_canada/10442223.stm


Why not? His father was an alien national and Communist, who might have been a Russian spy in Kenya for all we know. His mother also could have been a Russian spy of her own free will. And Obama describes himself as one who is "like a spy behind enemy lines" when in Manhattan. Was Obama working with Alice Palmer's KGB agent when he was her right hand man in Chicago?

http://newzeal.blogspot.com/2009/11/obama-file-90-alice-palmer-re-examined.html


Was Obama in contact with the KGB in NYC and in Massachusetts, and groomed by their American contacts? Perhaps vetted from his youth by Communist Frank Marshall Davis

http://newzeal.blogspot.com/2010/02/obama-file-96-coincidence-obama-frank.html

as well as his family?


Was Obama even born in the United States of America...or is his unsubstantiated claim just a Communist assisted cover-up by American Communists and active foreign agents? Foreign Communist agents like the 10 Russians waging a Second Cold War who were just caught in New York, and curiously, most all of them were also alleged to have been planted BEFORE Obama stopped working for Alice Palmer, the KGB mole hugger; after whose employ Barack Hussein Obama suddenly ascended among the Communist-Socialists of the DSA in Chicago almost immediately thereafter? Was Obama also an American Case Officer or go-between liason of Russian Spies as a State Senator aka. Community Organizer, using his SEIU, ACORN, and other connections?



Ask the questions America. We don't even know where this guy was born, what his birth weight was, if he even actually attended Columbia University or just spent a 3 day weekend there or what.


2) He is someone who nominates an unqualified and non-jurist to be processed before the US Senate, who is on record as an avowed Socialist with Communist and Socialist associations and leanings, as well as a progressive agenda to change the meaning of Free Speech to whatever a Government entity dictates is NOT a harm to that Gov't entity's subjective view as what a "societal cost" is.

http://www.abanet.org/publiced/preview/briefs/pdfs/07-08/08-769_Petitioner.pdf

Kagan wrote in US  v. Stevens (2010)

This Court has recognized that some categories of
speech lack First Amendment protection, because the
speech has little or no expressive value and causes serious
societal harms.
Whether a given category of speech enjoys
First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical
balancing of the value of the speech against its societal
costs.


Hence, Kagan as a jurist would rule that there is no free speech regarding Capitalism, because it is a moral evil, and thus can be banned...as well as outlawing free religious speech by Christians and Jews, and anything having to do with the Bible...and I think, would promote Islam as a State forced anti-Christ religion.

In other words, using "animal cruelty", Kagan seeks to open the door of precedent where all Christians and Jews can be silenced, fined, and imprisoned for public acts of faith from verbal expression to a public display of a cross about one's neck, or an "of faith" t-shirt, while advocating and endorsing Muslim proselytizing, symbolism, burka wearing requirements or what have you. The societal costs and free speech protection no longer falls to strict originalist Constitutional language, but to whatever it is "evolved" to say by whomever rules at the time.

Treavor Loudon at New Zeal writes:
"If Elena Kagan is a moderate, why then has she long associated with people connected to three interrelated organizations - the Communist Party USA, the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee/ Democratic Socialists of America and the far left Washington D.C. think tank, Institute for Policy Studies?

Raised on New Yorks' Upper West Side, Elena Kagan's parents were both politically active in a place and era where politics was dominated by the Democratic, Socialist and Communist parties.

Elena's mother Gloria Kagan campaigned to elect far left Democratic Congressman, William Fitts Ryan. Her older brother Marc Kagan was active in the socialist influenced New Directions movement in the Transport Workers Union. When one of its leaders, Roger Toussaint, was elected union president in 2000, Mr. Kagan became his chief of staff, until a falling out occurred in 2003.

Marc Kagan's former comrade and boss, Roger Toussaint is prominent in the communist initiated Coalition of Black Trade Unionists, which now led by D.S.A. member William Lucy. He also serves in the leadership of the Center for the Study of Working Class Life at Stony Brook University, alongside Ray Markey from the Communist Party offshoot Committees of Correspondence and D.S.A. leaders Gerry Hudson, Mark Levinson, Stanley Aronowitz and Frances Fox Piven, co-originator of the infamous Cloward - Piven Strategy."

--Trevor Loudon, New Zeal

An example of the push of Progressivism toward totalitarianism is from Obama's political career launch party in Chicago, the DSA:

"...wrote Frank Llewellyn, national director of Democratic Socialists of America.

Writing in the latest issue of the socialist Democratic Left magazine, Llewellyn said "progressives" must use Obama's health-care legislation "to build support for the elimination of private insurers."


http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=172929

Pamela Gellar reveals that the Jewish Elena Kagan was obsessed with adopting a Communist turned "National Socialist" views as part of hers:

 "Elena Kagan's senior thesis at Princeton University, recounting the history of socialist politics in New York City, cited the theories of an influential German Marxist who notoriously switched allegiances to Nazism after Adolf Hitler attained power.


Werner Sombart was widely recognized as an academic proponent of Marxism and was once praised by Karl Marx's colleague Friedrich Engels as the only German professor who understood Marx's Das Kapital. During World War I, however, Sombart endorsed Germany's "heroic" war against the "capitalist spirit" represented by England. In 1934, Sombart published Deutscher Sozialismus, which advocated the "total ordering of life" as an expression of the German Volksgeist, or "national spirit."


In the introduction to her 1981 thesis, Kagan addresses a question famously asked by Sombart: Warum gibt es in den Vereinigten Staaten keinen Sozialismus? -- "Why is there no socialism in the United States?"


"The Socialist Party of the United States could not lay claim to the kind of pure proletarianism that Sombart considered essential to any socialist movement; indeed, most of the party’s members did not even consider this a worthy goal," Kagan wrote on Page 3 of the thesis. "But the American socialists ‘failure’ to build a movement that even resembled Sombart's idealized notion of a class-conscious party . . . did not render their party any less significant. Nor did such a failure render their party any less successful. In the first two decades of the twentieth century the American socialist movement, whose very existence Sombart refused to consider, grew if not by leaps and bounds at least by inches."


In the final pages of her thesis -- To the Final Conflict: Socialism in New York City, 1900-1933 -- Kagan returns to Sombart's theories, writing: "Why, in particular, did the socialist movement never become an alternative to the nation’s established parties? In answering this question, historians have often called attention to various characteristics of American society that have militated against widespread acceptance of radical movements. These societal traits -- an ethnically divided worked class, a relatively fluid class structure, an economy which allowed at least some workers to enjoy what Sombart termed ‘reefs of roast beef and apple pie,' -- prevented the early twentieth century socialists from attracting an immediate mass following. Such conditions did not, however, completely checkmate American socialism."


Even before he embraced National Socialism, Sombart's socialist theories reflected an anti-Semitic tendency that identified Jews with capitalism, a theme explored in his 1911 book, Die Juden und das Wirtschaftsleben ("The Jews and Economics," which was published in a 1913 English translation titled, The Jews and Modern Capitalism). "   -- Pamela Gellar, Atlasshrugs

 
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2010/07/shocking-kagans-princeton-thesis-cited-german-socialist-who-endorsed-nazis.html



There is a clear reason why modern Progressives do not wish to be transparent on their views...because they wish a totalitarian form of governance of the Communist persuasion.


Who is the Judicial "hero" Kagan would most like to copy and pattern herself after as a Judge, were she ever to become one?

It is an activist Israeli Judge, Aharon Barak, who figures judges need to dynamical alter and change the meaning of the texts of law to fit whatever NEW interpretation they wish to impose upon the text in order to achieve a desired end result, as this linked video shows.




So if we were to ask Kagan about the "Progressive" interpretation of the Law that she is pursuing, and have gotten the honest no-holds barred answer,

we would have ended up with an answer such as "the reinterpretation of law whose end-game is the overthrowing of the Republic of the United States" or "the political isogesis of redefining the US Constitution and all laws until we achieve a totalitarian State modeled after..." ( and then fill in the blank). That is, IF she would have been honest or honestly answered Senator Sessions on her Progressive Legal Re-interpretations on US Law, such as Free Speech as she so wrote to the Supreme Court in US v. Stevens THIS YEAR!!!


Obama Family Origins: A legacy of Hate motivation based on Hussein Obama's Torture by British in Kenya?
The more we ask the questions about who and what Obama is, the more we see the extreme relevance of what a release and examination of the Long Form Birth Certificate is, as well as the following of the Constitution's "Natural Born Citizen" in its originalist interpretation of even having a US Citizen Father instead of an alien national Communist who may or may not have been a Soviet Agent because his father (Barack's grandfather) sought to overthrow the British and got tortured after he was captured. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1091499/Barack-Obamas-grandfather-tortured-British-Kenyas-Mau-Mau-rebellion.html


So if, hypothetically, Barack's grandfather and father associated with Soviet agents in Kenya, and became Communists there...and (hypothetically) his white grandparents did so with Communist agents in the US (possibly from Cuba, and other third world Communists as well possibly those from China)... and (hypothetically) by releasing his birth info, some of that information can be leaked out, such as because of the name of the hospital administrator or physician or location born...why would Barack ever want to release his Long Form birth certificate, stating the hospital and street address he was allegedly born at, especially if it was NOT in the USA?

He would do exactly as he does today. Play the long game, and focus on the Revolution from within the Executive Office, and destroy the Republic of the USA from within, but bit by bit, and through whatever orders and legislation he can get away with while so doing it (so as to avoid an immediate uproar, alledged impeachment, or other what have you).


Barack Hussein Obama, Usurper of the US Presidency with a US Congress and US Supreme Court asleep at the switch, or actively conspiring under the false pride of moral intellectualism, as if it could never happen here, and people in the "real world" just would do that. Really? Then why do we even have a DIA and CIA ? Yikes!

In the meantime, while our intelligence agencies are asleep at the switch, we have a potential past domestic collaborator with foreign agents of those of Communist nations wishing to help subvert and overthrow the US who says to America:

Being an American is not a matter of blood or birth, it’s a matter of faith.”

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/07/01/obama_being_an_american_not_a_matter_of_blood_or_birth.html

A shortened Youtube video snip drops the last 5 words:



Contrary to Obama is the Supreme Court Law, the original intent of the Founding Fathers (regarding what a Natural Born Citizen is), and the history behind it: the history reaching back to the Bible for Nature's Law, and the Greeks (like Plato) for the Law of Nations.


Being an American, therefore, and contrary to Obama, is by a combined action of Nature's Law and the Law of Nations, where by blood being joined to a people by Covenant Oath: when a parent or ancestor is adopted into a national family or the nation of the United States of America, those descendants who follow him, being born by blood or birth, and soil, become Americans through their fathers by blood and by birth in the United States or one of its sovereign territories. The nationality of the child as an American Citizen is not dependent upon their ethnicity, but the Covenant Citizen Relationship of the parent with the United States, the location of birth, the domicility of the child, and the fact that the child is subject to the laws and sovereignty of the United States.



If it were merely a matter of faith and not of blood or birth under the Law, then anyone in the world who runs up a US Flag, and says by faith that they are now American -- without union by blood, birth, soil, and an officially recognized covenant oath with and to the US -- Obama declares as an American?

  So from the Pygmies in Africa, to head-shrinkers living on the Amazon, to active members on the Chinese Communist Parliament or in the Russian spy agencies...anyone who simply says, "by faith, I am an American,"  is so in Obamaworld?  Do we now pay these Social Security welfare checks  and change the rules of who collects the benefits of US taxpayers if they should be unemployed, and having a financial hardship? 

Oh yeah. here we go again with Mr. Hypocrite on transparency, who enables America's enemies, who sticks it to the South's poor by refusing to allow international skimmers to clean the Gulf of Mexico's oil at a greater rate than its gushing, available for months now, and refused...the same one refusing to show proof he was even born on US Soil with an actual hospital or Long Form Birth Certificate, now wants the citizens of the world to what...just say they are Americans by faith, and then he can have Congress justify themselves to pass bills to send our tax dollars to pork projects in Venezuela, Cuba, Kenya, and wherever they "by faith" say they are Americans in their hearts?

If America can't see the importance of such a treasonous and seditious statement as Obama uttered for what it is, then the Communists have won the Second Cold War, and our nuclear destruction by America's Third World enemies is not far behind. Perhaps even to the point where Obama ships them some of our nuclear arsenal, so as to "balance power" in the world under the excuse of making the world safer. Just when you thought such a thought was too incredulous, just give him another year, and it may actually come true. One of the nations perhaps being to his beloved Imams of Iran. And guess which two destinations they will program such missiles to strike? Israel, and the United States of America.

Obama viewed himself in Manhattan, says he in his book "Dreams from my Father"..."like a spy behind enemy lines". If he felt that way about Capitalist Manhattan New York City in the early 1980s...what must he feel like being a usurper in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C.?

No comments:

Post a Comment