Welcome! Jesus Christ is my LORD and Savior! Romans 10:9-10,13; John 3:16

[For EU visitors, I do not personally use cookies, but Google or any clickable link (if you choose to click on it) might. This is in compliance with mandatory EU notification]

I am a Natural Born United States Citizen with NO allegiance or citizenship to any nation but my own, and will use this site as a hobby place of sorts to present my own political and religious viewpoints, as a genuine Constitutional Conservative and a genuine Christian Conservative.

Thank you for coming.
In the Year of our LORD Jesus Christ
-- As of January 20, 2017
A Sigh Of Relief With The Inauguration Of Donald John Trump as President of the United States of America, And Hope For A Prosperous Future For All United States Citizens (we who are a nation called "the melting pot of the world"). We shall be great and exceptionally great again.

It is likely that the entries to this blog will be less frequent than in years past. I do intend to keep this blog active, and to offer insightful information and/or opinion (and sometimes humor and/or entertainment on occasion) when I do post.

Peace and Liberty. Semper Fidelis.

Monday, April 4, 2011

A new gas tax of an additional $2.40 a gallon eyed by the Department of Transportation and the Obama Administration to CRUSH America's poor, create a severe Depression, and overthrow the US Republic. All this grief could have been averted on the ineligibility of Obama issue, you know.

On April 04, 2011, "The Hill" reports that 22 Republicans sent Obama a letter asking where he intends to get the astronomically increased figure of $435,000,000,000 (that 435 billion dollars in revenue) for the Department of Transportation in the coming budget year.  


If America consumes at a rate of 9 million 55 gallon barrels of gas per day, or at a rate of 495,000,000 gallons of gas per day, and 180,675,000,000 gallons of gas per year...in order to achieve a total income of $435,000,000,000 in revenue specified that the Department of Transportation intends will be there to fund its schemes, there would need to be a necessary increase of $2.40 per gallon added to what you would already pay at the gas pump in adjusting for market fluctuations.  Aircraft and any means of transportation using gas will also see this jump, and services from airline tickets to sending packages and mail to delivering food and goods to local stores and establishments will also have to likewise exponentially increase costs.  Intentional and self-induced national sabotage (i.e., Obama Administrative self-induced) hyper-inflation will have arrived if this action is implemented.

In other words, at the already over-inflated charging at the pumps of about 60 cents or more per gallon profit on the manufacturing charges by the Oil Companies in order to achieve repeated record profits exceeding $40,000,000,000 per year (etc.)... and that on top of expected local station profit revenues of .08 - .16 cents per gallon (sometimes much higher) at the franchise end, Obama wants add another burden of a gas tax upon the consumers as high as $2.40 per gallon, and spike gas prices to between $6 and $7 a gallon, in order to turn the United States into a Third World depressed country like what he knew in Indonesia as a boy...a miserable existence in which he use poverty as a hammer and sickle upon the poor, and manipulate them into his mobs to do his bidding, while ruling as a dictator. 

In Obama's mind, if the poor are hungry enough and desperate enough, they will do his bidding like he was the dictator of Communist China

Mr. Obama has told people that it would be so much easier to be the president of China. As one official put it, “No one is scrutinizing Hu Jintao’s words in Tahrir Square.”

(which he believes he was more suited to be), or that of a military dictator like Idi Amin, able to genocide his enemies by arming those willing to swear fealty and kill for him, even if just for the feeding of a single meal. 

If the Administration taxes every gallon of oil, at 900,000,000,000 (900 billion) gallons per year, there would be a either value added tax at the manufacturing level on all goods and products produced at a rate of 48 cents per gallon of oil, or an import and/or domestic barrel of oil tax of  $26.40 per barrel of oil, on top of whatever market prices already are.  And either way, once that is instituted, the revenue demands for increased splurge spending will soon drive the additional extortion costs to as high as $70 per barrel within 12-24 months. 

The immediate results will be a more severe Depression than the Great Depression, and unprecedented  food shortages, because the Obama Government will Environmental Protection Agency ban anyone from being allowed to grow their own food, etc.  We already saw this movement and coordination early on in the Obama Administration, in March of 2009.


By creating a massive Depression and severe unemployment, virtually guaranteed to sky-rocket above 36% within 6 months, Obama's cronies assume that they can then collapse the US Government, and offer to create their Communist-Socialist substitute with a New Communist-Socialist Constitution alleged to be already extant, pre-written by Cass Sunstein and certain Communist and avowed hardcore Socialists.

The excuse he will offer is that it is all about "Cap-and-Trade" and all about forcing a reduction in greenhouse gases, even as he has said in 2008 in the video below.

All this could have been avoided, if Congress had bothered to do its Constitutional duties in 2008, rather than being the most corrupt Congress in the history of the United States. An example that the 2010 mid-term elections were not successful in sending a message of Conservatism and accountability to Washington, D.C. has surfaced in the form of a desire of 15 Democrats and Republicans co-sponsoring the Chuck Schumer's bill that the US Senate not bother to vet Obama appointees, as this will "stream-line" his selections to auto-appointments.


 In other words, when it comes to vetting, Obama appears to be about as immune and as worshipped as we would expect "666" or "the Anti-Christ" to be from non-born-again Christians.  They refuse to vet Obama because he rewards their corruption, even while he coalitions and has the CIA train Al Qaeda in Libya, in preparation of attacks they will launch here within the United States in 2012.  And in the meantime, Obama probably sits back and laughs, and quotes

Allah, too plans, but the best of planners
[The Arabic equates 'planners' with liars, fakers, bluffers, and deceivers]
is Allah."
(Surah 8:30)

Never one single Christmas or Easter or Yom Kippur message, only Islamic love and kisses to the Shia Muslims of Iran, where his heart is.  And a couple weeks ago, by example, he was true to form.

Obama in subtlety by historic reference, infers to a period of ancient Persian Conquest and war-mongering...and in effect to Iranian ears, calls on the young people to become that of their ancient greatness...in other words, be those who will conquer Iraq and re-establish ancient Persia in the modern day, and make Iran the New Persia or super-state of the region.  Don't oppress the young people, he admonishes the mullahs by his inferences, turn their energy into conquest.  That's what he is diplomatically saying to Iranian ears.

Meanwhile, the US Senate gives Obama the green light to forget the US Constitution in seeking Congressional authorization to go to war in the absence of an imminent threat to our national security.  It was only his response because Ghadaffi dared to bring up how that Obama was Muslim and born in Africa again, at a time when the numbers in the polls show such to be credible to as many as 70% of  Republicans and Independents.



“…at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was both a U.S. citizen (by virtue of being born in Hawaii) and a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC) by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.” states Joe Miller


Thus, even the pro-Obama Annenburg funded web-site, “Factcheck.org”, admits to Barack not being a 100% US only birth citizen of 2 US Citizen parents, and confess that Barack's citizenship status was also passed through his father until his 23rd birthday.

Any duality of citizenship at birth, is an AUTOMATIC DISQUALIFICATION to run for or to be a holder of the Presidency of the United States of America.

Further, the de facto and de jure legal definition of a United States Natural Born Citizen with the meaning of the US Constitution and US Supreme Court cases has an expectancy of being a sole legience US Citizen at age 21 by Article 2.1.5 and the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution as well as at birth.

So by NOT being a sole US Citizen at age 21 and age 22, as well as NOT so at birth, Obama has illegally obtained the US Presidency, failing to be a United States "Natural Born Citizen".

Was his father a United States Citizen? No, he was an of age adult citizen of Kenya, then a British Commonwealth, and a subject of the United Kingdom, with whom we had a Treaty with that overshadows the birth citizenship issue, even if Barack II was born in the United States.

Was his mother of legal age to confer a US Citizenship if he were born in a foreign country? No. She was a legal minor under the laws of 1961, allegedly married at the time to a foreign national adult male.  Under the 19th Amendment, and statutory laws, Ann was not of legal age to either vote nor to legally confer citizenship. Ipso facto, Barack was not a United States Natural Born Citizen because the transition of his becoming a United States Citizen was not sole nor a natural and foregone conclusion, having a fourth alleged citizenship by the age of 18, that of Indonesia as well as active British and Kenyan Citizenships.

And in "Factcheck's" own words, so allegedly correct that its author Joe Miller was hired as a High Public Relations Official in the Obama Administration:

{Pulled up on and block-copied exactly on 02/04/2010 - emphases mine}

"Since Sen. Obama has neither renounced his U.S. citizenship nor sworn an oath of allegiance to Kenya, his Kenyan citizenship automatically expired on Aug. 4,1984.

Corrected (Sep. 3, 2009): Our original article incorrectly stated that then-Sen. Obama lost his Kenyan citizenship on Aug. 4, 1982. The correct date is Aug. 4, 1984. The Kenyan Constitution required Obama to choose whether to keep either his U.S. or Kenyan citizenship upon his 21st birthday, which was in 1982. But we initially missed that the Constitution provided him a two-year window for making that choice.

So Obama did not lose his Kenyan citizenship until his 23rd birthday in 1984. We have updated the item to reflect this.

- Joe Miller


Rocky Mountain News Staff. "Things You Might Not Know About Barack Obama." 6 August 2007. The Rocky Mountain News. 24 August 2008.

Temple, John. "8-word Gaffe Ripples Across Web." 15 August 2007. The Rocky Mountain News. 24 August 2008.

The British Nationality Act, 1948. "

So even the very spin-doctor that was part of Obama's former employer, the Annenburg Fund, and whom was also hired by the Obama administration, this Joe Miller, acknowledges a multi-citizenship to Barack Obama at birth.

That multi-citizenship at birth, to Kenya and Britain (and to the US, IF AND ONLY IF he was born here) means Obama fails a mandatory Constitutional qualification to legally be or hold the office of the US Presidency.

In 1787, the United States Constitution was formulated, and stated:

"No Person except a Natural Born Citizen,

or a Citizen of the United States,

at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President;

neither shall any Person be eligible to that Office

who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years,

and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States."

Constitution of the United States of America, Article 2, section 1, Clause 5

In the Madison Debates, on September 7, 1787, it was then that it was entered that "the President should be a natural- born Citizen," of which he bore no allegiance or citizenship to any other nation than that of the United States of America.

In expounding the Constitution of the United States, every word must have its due force and appropriate meaning, for it is evident from the whole instrument that no word was unnecessarily used or needlessly added. The many discussions which have taken place upon the construction of the Constitution have proved the correctness of this proposition and shown the high talent, the caution, and the foresight of the illustrious men who framed it. Every word appears to have been weighed with the utmost deliberation, and its force and effect to have been fully understood. No word in the instrument, therefore, can be rejected as superfluous or unmeaning, and this principle of construction applies …”
Holmes v. Jennison, 39 U.S. (14 Peters) 540 @ 570-71 (1840)http://supreme.justia.com/us/39/540/case.html

In the Sep/Oct 1884 issue of the American Law Review, just 16 years after the passing of the 14th Amendment, Democratic lawyer George D. Collins (of the Wong Kim Ark fame) stated that in order to be “natural born” of a particular citizenship, such as the United States, “that his father be at the time of the birth of such a person a citizen thereof”".

Again, as an authority on explaining a Natural Born Citizenship distinction, Collins is that same co-prosecutor for the United States who won the landmark case of US v. Wong Kim Ark 169 US 649 in 1898,

George D. Collins, as stated before in the American Law Review in 1884 wrote that:
"Birth, therefore, does not ipso facto confer citizenship, and it is essential in order that a person be A NATIVE or NATURAL BORN CITIZEN of the United States, that his father be at the time of the birth of such person a citizen thereof..."

The New Englander and Yale Law Review, Volume 3 (1845)
"The expression ‘citizen of the United States occurs in the clauses prescribing qualifications for Representatives, for Senators, and for President. In the latter, the term ‘natural born citizen’ is used and excludes all persons owing allegiance by birth to foreign states.”http://books.google.com/books?id=gGNJAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA414&dq=Vattel+%2B%22natural+born+citizen%22&as_brr=4&cd=5#v=onepage&q=Vattel%20%20%22natural%20born%20citizen%22&f=false

Elk v. Wilkins, 112 US 94 (1884) @ 101-102 states that: 

"The main object of the opening sentence of the fourteenth amendment was to settle the question, upon which there had been a difference of opinion throughout the country and in this court, as to the citizenship of free negroes, (Scott v. Sandford, 19 How. 393;) and to put it beyond doubt that all persons, white or black, and whether formerly slaves or not, born or naturalized in the United States, and OWING NO ALLEGIANCE TO ANY ALIEN POWER, should be citizens of the United States and of the state in which they reside. Slaughter-House Cases, 16 Wall. 36, 73; Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303, 306." 

Obama owed legience to both the United Kingdom (Great Britain) and Kenya at birth, regardless if he was born in the US or not, only by complete dishonesty can anyone label the man a qualified occupant of the Presidency.  Ipso facto and de jure, he is not legally President of the United States, and his entire occupancy is legally voidable. 

On January 19, 2011

and on January 25, 2011

It is almost conclusive in the journalistic sense, that the only thing on file in Hawaii as regards Obama is a data entry of : "Obama II, Barack Hussein, Male...." instead of any United States Birth Certicate or Certification of Live Birth.

As reported on January 21, 2011,
by the Honolulu Star Advertiser.
 Quote: “Health Department spokeswoman Janice Okubo again confirmed today that Obama's name is found in its alphabetical list of names of people born in Hawaii, maintained in bound copies available for public view. That information, called index data, shows a listing for "Obama II, Barack Hussein, Male," according to the department's website.” Unquote.

On December 27, 2010 (updated 12/31/2010)
I posted that Trevor Loudon of New Zealand had uncovered a pattern where Obama’s mentors or close associates in Hawaii and Illinois had direct ties to Soviet KGB in America.

On May 1, 2010, at his second Correspondent’s dinner,

Obama is on video remarking that he could not find his Birth Certificate. Quote: There are few things in life that harder to find and more important to keep than love…well, love and a birth certificate.” Unquote.

In this instance,of NOT being able to find his Long Form Birth Certificate, I believe that Obama  was being serious…and even as with Groucho Marx, who at times was serious in stating what he thought to be the truth and came off funny, so it was for Obama. To the audience, "truth IS the joke."   That audience was including those US Senators as well.  Then, as well as NOW, they do so at the expense of the vast majority of those in the USA, and to the great oppression of the working poor and those working and earning below Middle Class among us, amongst which there is NO racial or ethnic distinction...only the character of the individual or group of individuals, their responses, and their faith in themselves and in G-D and His Son Jesus Christ (or the lack of faith thereof and thereto).
Without the birth certificate with witnesses to the birth, he is again disqualified. 
The Demand for the Birth Certificate is predicated on 2 US Supreme Court Cases that are used in argument to justify the demand of either a US President or US Presidential Candidate:

Barack Hussein Obama II has not even a proof of citizenship that meets the legal definition of birth citizenship identification as is Law defined in specificity by the US Supreme Court.

"The burden of establishing a delegation of power to the United States,

or the prohibition of power to the States,

is upon those making the claim."

Bute v. Illinois, 333 US 640 (1948) @ 653

[i.e., the burden of proof is upon those being President to prove they are Natural Born Citizens and Constitutionally eligible.]

“The mother's relation is verifiable from the birth itself and is documented by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses to the birth.” @54

" In the case of the mother, the relation is verifiable from the birth itself. The mother's status is documented in most instances by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses who attest to her having given birth.” @ 62

Nguyen v. INS, 533 US 53 (2001) @ 54,62

Obama has NO witnesses to the birth as found on a Long Form Birth Certificate, and NO hospital birth Certificate to validate the location with witness to the birth affidavits. Not even his dying white grandmother, whom he spent more than 5 days to rush to as she labored for every breath in October 2008, not even she would sign such an affidavit that he was US Born or in what hospital.

"You know, as soon as the Old Man died,

the lawyers contacted all those who might have a claim to the inheritance.
Unlike my mum,
has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was."
Dreams from My Father, p. 345
a Barack Obama autobiography de facto ghost-written by Bill Ayers

Not even a United States Social Security Administration Number to call his own for 3 decades, he had to steal one  and commit identity theft from someone born in 1890, and even used that stolen SS# to apply for selective service, and kept using it even in Washington D.C. not too long ago. 

Orly Taitz Interview:

Dr. Alan Keyes,
former United States Ambassador to the United Nations interview

Older vieo: A Question of Eligibility

Some further reading, articles by New Jersey Attorney Mario Apuzzo:







http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bd9K2Q3EbVQ  (Youtube video, example how Obama Campaign forger likely created a phony online Obama short form Certification of Live Birth)

http://i180.photobucket.com/albums/x13/Mactographer/birth_certificate_2-1.jpg   (A final production alteration of that same piece of junk his campaign offered to Mickey Hussein Mouse II)

No comments:

Post a Comment