Barack born here in Kenya!!! The Official Transcript of the Nation of Kenya’s Parliament, 03/25/2010

Exposed via Mario Apuzzo's Blog comment support:

https://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=7466841558189356289&postID=5680933773060230686

http://www.bunge.go.ke/parliament/downloads/tenth_forth_sess/Hansard/RDRAFT25.03P.pdf

NATIONAL ASSEMBLY
OFFICIAL REPORT
Thursday, 25th March, 2010
The House met at 2.30 p.m.


The Minister for Lands (Mr. Orengo):
p. 29 “… In the Kenyan tradition, other than the struggles that took place before 1963, we had decided that we will resolve conflicts, including the constitutional ones, through the ballot and
that will be signified by the referendum that the people will take part in, in order to enact
this new Constitution.

Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, we made a great achievement. This document, in othercountries comes by way of revolution; by way of people shedding blood. We like citing the American Constitution, which came through struggle and a revolution. Even the French Revolution or in recent history, in South Africa, their Constitution was achieved
through struggle and violence. But we are lucky here in Kenya that we are reaching this great moment, choosing the ballot rather than the bullet.”


p.30 “…Mr. Deputy Speaker, Sir, if we are creating regions or counties on the basis of ethnicity, you have missed the point about devolution. If we want to live in ethnic cocoons, devolution will not resolve our problems. Even a Member of Parliament said yesterday that Kenya is still a tribal country even as we say that we are a unitary State.

Devolution is giving the promises of better governance because you are taking the administration, accountability and resources to the people. If you look at Nairobi today, the Maasai or Kikuyus can claim Nairobi today, but times have changed. Nairobi now is a metropolitan City. In another ten years, Mandera also will be a metropolitan city. So,

p.31 the way to look at devolution is about governance. If at all we take this Constitution without looking at the elements of devolution properly, then I am afraid we have missed the boat. We should be very courageous and brave because in 1963, resources were going to the regions. It was not by changing the Constitution that the regions went but by
starving the regions of funds and even the power to tax the regions. That is how the regions were killed. But when the regions were working, even hon. Ngala was feeling better and safer as the president of the Coast region rather than being a Member of Parliament here.

The other thing that we are addressing through devolution is exclusion. What has made us suffer as a nation is exclusion. Once people feel excluded, even when you want to employ a policeman or constable or you want to build a dispensary, it must come from the centre. In the colonial days, these things were being done on the ground and they could give bursaries and build roads. I commend devolution. Those who fear devolution
are living in the past. They are being guided by their ethnic consideration and objectives.

They are living in the past. If America was living in a situation where they feared ethnicity and did not see itself as a multiparty state or nation, how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the President of America? It is because they did away with exclusion.


----------------------------------------------

"...how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the President of America?

...how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the President of America?

...how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the President of America?"



Ask the Communist-Socialist Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi who signed off
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=109363
on the illegitimate Presidential Candidate Barack Hussein Obama!!!