Congressional Representative Allen West R-Florida
by phone on the Glenn Beck Radio Program
In an interview with CNN Leftist Ideologue whose Alinksy tactics essentially failed in the interview.
While publicly there are
...that doesn't mean there
aren't more privately more than that in Congress.
Progressives are those who say we must "pro-gress away from the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution", and thereby to a day when YOU HAVE NO BILL OF RIGHTS to free speech, to own a gun, to a trial by a jury of your peers, etc.
For example, all these rights such as were first ratified, can be Pro-gressed away from and stripped from you....as well as all the later amendments.
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
You want to lose these? Progressives call them disposable...something they want to throw away and replace. When freedom is given by law and in writing....why give it up for unbridled tyranny and misery? We shouldn't by any means.
And while "Pro-gressives" / Neo-Communists teach religious tolerance to Islamic Proselytizing, they would rather use the most "pliable" useful idiots there are...those who are the most godless, humanistic, obsessed with money to coveting thy neighbor's stuff, easily manipulated into (not just confrontation, but) lawlessness / anarchy and drivel.
Then doodle and learn to act like gullible 5 year olds in adult bodies? Yikes!
[Update 04/21/2012:
Also check out the ff. link of
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.11830/pub_detail.asp
which also includes the ff.
"David Bossie, founder of the conservative group Citizens United, says that people advocating to overturn the landmark Supreme Court case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission are a “posse of radicals” who are trying to "overturn the First Amendment."
“So that’s why I say they’re a posse of radicals who are looking for a problem rather than a dedicated group of people who are analyzing something seriously and trying to find a way forward,”
...
Bossie said that McCain-Feingold – which set limits on how much donors could give to independent political organizations as well as limits on when those organizations could run ads – “criminalized” political speech. He said it also created an unfair environment by exempting media organizations from its restrictions.
In its 2010 decision on Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court agreed with Bossie, striking those provisions of the law and affirming that political organizations had First Amendment rights."
CNS News reports:
"House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi on Thursday endorsed a movement announced by other congressional Democrats on Wednesday to ratify an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would allow Congress to regulate political speech when it is engaged in by corporations as opposed to individuals.
...several members in both houses of Congress have offered various versions of an amendment to reverse Citizen United v. FEC and curb unwanted speech by corporations. Rep. Jim McGovern (D.-Mass.) is one of the members sponsoring an amendment.
“I've introduced a People's Rights Amendment, which is very simple and straightforward,” Rep. Jim McGovern (D.-Mass.) said at the forum. “It would make clear that all corporate entities, for-profit and non-profit alike, are not people with constitutional rights."
hen
in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to
dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and
to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station
to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent
respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the
causes which impel them to the separation.
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. —
by phone on the Glenn Beck Radio Program
In an interview with CNN Leftist Ideologue whose Alinksy tactics essentially failed in the interview.
Representative West is technically correct. See David Horowitz "Discover the Networks" link of:
While publicly there are
76 members that are currently publicly listed as on the
2012 Congressional Progressive Caucus
...that doesn't mean there
aren't more privately more than that in Congress.
Co-Chairs (2)
- Keith Ellison
- Raúl Grijalva
Vice Chairs (5)
- Tammy Baldwin
- Judy Chu
- William “Lacy” Clay
- Sheila Jackson-Lee
- Chellie Pingree
Whip (1)
- Hank Johnson
Senate Member (1)
- Bernie Sanders
House Members (67)
- Karen Bass
- Xavier Becerra
- Earl Blumenauer
- Corrine Brown
- Michael Capuano
- Andre Carson
- Donna Christensen
- Yvette Clarke
- Emanuel Cleaver
- David Cicilline
- Steve Cohen
- John Conyers
- Elijah Cummings
- Danny Davis
- Peter DeFazio
- Rosa DeLauro
- Donna Edwards
- Sam Farr
- Chaka Fattah
- Bob Filner
- Barney Frank
- Marcia Fudge
- Luis Gutierrez
- Janice Hahn
- Maurice Hinchey
- Mazie Hirono
- Rush Holt
- Michael Honda
- Jesse Jackson, Jr.
- Eddie Bernice Johnson
- Marcy Kaptur
- Dennis Kucinich
- Barbara Lee
- John Lewis
- David Loebsack
- Ben Ray Lujan
- Carolyn Maloney
- Ed Markey
- Jim McDermott
- James McGovern
- Brad Miller
- George Miller
- Gwen Moore
- Jim Moran
- Jerrold Nadler
- Eleanor Holmes Norton
- John Olver
- Frank Pallone
- Ed Pastor
- Jared Polis
- Charles Rangel
- Laura Richardson
- Lucille Roybal-Allard
- Bobby Rush
- Linda Sanchez
- Jan Schakowsky
- Jose Serrano
- Louise Slaughter
- Pete Stark
- Bennie Thompson
- John Tierney
- Nydia Velazquez
- Maxine Waters
- Mel Watt
- Peter Welch
- Frederica Wilson
- Lynn Woolsey
[Update 04/21/2012: Nancy Pelosi, for example, is missing from the list because she is alleged to have only a "former" membership. Please read up on the informative Key-wiki page on this group at:
end of 04/21/2012 update in this section...see rest of noted 04/21/2012 update below]
Progressives are those who say we must "pro-gress away from the Declaration of Independence and the United States Constitution", and thereby to a day when YOU HAVE NO BILL OF RIGHTS to free speech, to own a gun, to a trial by a jury of your peers, etc.
For example, all these rights such as were first ratified, can be Pro-gressed away from and stripped from you....as well as all the later amendments.
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defence.
In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.
You want to lose these? Progressives call them disposable...something they want to throw away and replace. When freedom is given by law and in writing....why give it up for unbridled tyranny and misery? We shouldn't by any means.
And while "Pro-gressives" / Neo-Communists teach religious tolerance to Islamic Proselytizing, they would rather use the most "pliable" useful idiots there are...those who are the most godless, humanistic, obsessed with money to coveting thy neighbor's stuff, easily manipulated into (not just confrontation, but) lawlessness / anarchy and drivel.
I recently got to experience this 99% training nonsense for myself, and the gist was...even if you have nothing to complain about, find something, and organize NOW (even if you didn't have a beef up to this point). Make a target (they teach) out of a private institution like a bank, freeze, organize and create non-violent anarchy...and organize others around you into a people power (non-violent for now) mob, and and act NOW. But if you have to cross the line, be within YOUR moral compass, whatever limit that is and whatever limit that places upon you. Never mind the use of corrupt politicians as an example...go after the real enemies, the banks, the oil companies, yada - yada -yada.... And strangely enough...when they use the theme of "our values"... and they teach covetousness with expressed confrontational anger and physical rebellion so as to intentionally create a new criminal society of arrestees who will suffer in any economic recovery if their overthrow of the Republic fails ...just what the hell do they think is so great about their values and the senseless destruction it will bring in the economic and social lives of those who follow?
The 99% Movement's Financiers and chief organizers, it seems to me, really only seem to wish to have people driven into the human drivel misery, and while cycling video and wall posts of how bad the masses have it under Obama, curiously, the victims are NEVER allowed to mention Obama or to in any way blame him. It always has to be the corporate thug of some variant, and in general terms, sometimes "the leadership of both parties" so as to always keep the blame on anyone who does not subscribe with a total dismantling of the Republic of the United States into a totalitarian utopia with a benevolent happy dictator misspending their money even more grossly than Obama is already doing, and co-ruled over by a secret oligarchy Shadow Government of boards of governance of those who must be and must remain unknown to the masses.
Why there will be universal "health care", everyone will have a right to their own home...they say. But what they don't tell you, even while the leaders and organizers of the 99% movement off camera fawn over George Orwell and his "Animal Farm" -- in the newspeak of "Progressivism" ownership of a house means simply "to occupy", not to own title or deed to it, or have any rights other than you would if you rented a room for a night. It is occupancy redefined. Again, in the new parlance of Progressives, ownership means to them - "occupancy", but not to own (your home or place of dwelling). That right to title is now to be one of community ownership which as in Marxist-Leninism, requires "the People" / "The Government" to materially own not only the property in and upon which you live, but to view and treat YOU as their property as well.
Why there will be universal "health care", everyone will have a right to their own home...they say. But what they don't tell you, even while the leaders and organizers of the 99% movement off camera fawn over George Orwell and his "Animal Farm" -- in the newspeak of "Progressivism" ownership of a house means simply "to occupy", not to own title or deed to it, or have any rights other than you would if you rented a room for a night. It is occupancy redefined. Again, in the new parlance of Progressives, ownership means to them - "occupancy", but not to own (your home or place of dwelling). That right to title is now to be one of community ownership which as in Marxist-Leninism, requires "the People" / "The Government" to materially own not only the property in and upon which you live, but to view and treat YOU as their property as well.
Remember, there is NO fundamental difference between evil and wicked Communist regimes of the 20th Century and 21st Century United States Progressives ideologically. The only real difference, is that the massacres of millions and tens of millions in bloody revolution has not yet begun for the Progressives. They will replace the states and the stars of the flag with Obama's picture happily, because they hold to a personality worship complex, and the US Constitution, our Government, and you and I are all "disposable" to them.
The top leaders, financiers, thinkers of Communism called Progressivism all seem bent in their ideological desires and goals to have what they have previously called the bottom feeders and disposables, the useful idiot (emotionalists...regardless of race or financial condition) to start the Revolution of murder and mayhem for them. As with the Weather Underground paper in the late 1960s, they are in agreement that they need radical hate groups they can wind up with provocation that they set up and control, or use by seizing a crisis of opportunity that presents itself, to set in motion and then hope that others will join and swell the movement into mass crisis mode.
The top leaders, financiers, thinkers of Communism called Progressivism all seem bent in their ideological desires and goals to have what they have previously called the bottom feeders and disposables, the useful idiot (emotionalists...regardless of race or financial condition) to start the Revolution of murder and mayhem for them. As with the Weather Underground paper in the late 1960s, they are in agreement that they need radical hate groups they can wind up with provocation that they set up and control, or use by seizing a crisis of opportunity that presents itself, to set in motion and then hope that others will join and swell the movement into mass crisis mode.
America's Progressives have become so bold, that they are reaching the point of open challenge, that they are virtually saying "we are pro-gressing beyond the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution so as to strip YOU of every right to live and breathe except on OUR whim as new gods upon the Earth, masters over life and death..."
Start by envisioning a new Community in the year 2020, they say...and mean get use to the idea of a new Government to replace this one by the year 2020.
Start by envisioning a new Community in the year 2020, they say...and mean get use to the idea of a new Government to replace this one by the year 2020.
Then doodle and learn to act like gullible 5 year olds in adult bodies? Yikes!
And be led down the garden path as if what...as if all Americans are perpetually too stoned to know or care what's going on until it is too late? Well, at this moment in time...it isn't too late America.
I think Dennis Prager had it right. Add an adjective to certain words and...
[Update 04/21/2012:
Also check out the ff. link of
http://www.familysecuritymatters.org/publications/id.11830/pub_detail.asp
which also includes the ff.
In
2008, CPUSA members such as Joelle Fishman, chair of the political
action commission of the CPUSA [Communist Party United States of America], openly campaigned for Barack Obama. She wrote,
“It was enjoyable to knock on doors and find voters who were
enthusiastic and inspired by Obama’s historic candidacy…” They were
inspired because they knew that Obama was mentored in Hawaii by CPUSA
member Frank Marshall Davis. This was the open secret our media
concealed during the 2008 campaign. Professor Paul Kengor will try to
bring it back into public view with the release this summer of a book on Davis.
Fishman gave me an interview six months ago talking about the party’s direction in this presidential campaign. It took place at a “progressive”
conference that featured Van Jones. The CPUSA is not fielding its own
presidential candidate this year, out of deference to Obama.
Trevor Loudon points out
that “Joelle Fishman is the daughter-in-law of Soviet spy Victor Perlo.
Her role within the Communist Party involves coordinating efforts to
elect ‘progressive’ Democrats to state and national office and seeing
that the Democrats adopt Communist Party inspired policies.”
Meanwhile CNS News reports:
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/posse-radicals-wants-overturn-first-amendment-says-citizens-united-founder"David Bossie, founder of the conservative group Citizens United, says that people advocating to overturn the landmark Supreme Court case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission are a “posse of radicals” who are trying to "overturn the First Amendment."
“So that’s why I say they’re a posse of radicals who are looking for a problem rather than a dedicated group of people who are analyzing something seriously and trying to find a way forward,”
...
Bossie said that McCain-Feingold – which set limits on how much donors could give to independent political organizations as well as limits on when those organizations could run ads – “criminalized” political speech. He said it also created an unfair environment by exempting media organizations from its restrictions.
In its 2010 decision on Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, the Supreme Court agreed with Bossie, striking those provisions of the law and affirming that political organizations had First Amendment rights."
And then at the link of
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/pelosi-amend-first-amendmentCNS News reports:
"House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi on Thursday endorsed a movement announced by other congressional Democrats on Wednesday to ratify an amendment to the U.S. Constitution that would allow Congress to regulate political speech when it is engaged in by corporations as opposed to individuals.
...several members in both houses of Congress have offered various versions of an amendment to reverse Citizen United v. FEC and curb unwanted speech by corporations. Rep. Jim McGovern (D.-Mass.) is one of the members sponsoring an amendment.
“I've introduced a People's Rights Amendment, which is very simple and straightforward,” Rep. Jim McGovern (D.-Mass.) said at the forum. “It would make clear that all corporate entities, for-profit and non-profit alike, are not people with constitutional rights."
{So if you work there, you SELECTIVELY CEASE to have the Rights of a US Citizen. Once you take away the rights of US Citizens just because they work at or for a Corporation;
and to say by a majority vote in Congress that this or that group of US Citizens cease to have the rights to trial by jury, to free speech, to even vote -- (Progressive / neo-Communist Democrat Rep Jim McGovern of Massachusetts says NO CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS)-- then you can take it away from anyone at any time.
The unalienable rights, are rights that can't be taken away. They are identified in our Declaration of Independence as rights from GOD, not any human government of any kind.
IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776
The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America
hen
in the Course of human events it becomes necessary for one people to
dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another and
to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station
to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent
respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the
causes which impel them to the separation.We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. —
Self evident truths, as declared by the Declaration of Independence, are not just frowned upon with disdain and hate by the Progressives; as demonstrated by Pelosi and McGovern in this update, self evident truths regarding unalienable rights from GOD are openly called to be dismissed as far as "Pro-gressives" are concerned.
Next on their agenda to lose their rights will be who? Who does Obama attack and persecute, and push out? Religious Christians (both Catholic and conservative Protestant), any Constitutional Republican or Independent Conservative, Constitutional and/or Christian Conservatives in the Military and Law Enforcement and anyone else on their enemies list. Out of their own mouths and by their own actions, they gradually confirm publicly what I have stated about them. }
.....end of the 04/21/2012 update]
No comments:
Post a Comment