Obama 2010 tax filing uses identity theft stolen Social Security Number as his Tax ID Number

[Updated September 16, 2011] 

Hat Tip and thumbs up to Orly Taitz at http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/  for the document images I am re-posting and/or linking (depending on your computer browser's capability).

(Re: Complaints. Pictures not visible in certain Windows browsers or versions of Windows operating systems.
        One of the benefits of the internet, is that I have a world-wide audience of dozens of nations, but also many operating systems are used to get here.  I have discovered that after the first day of operation, not all browser systems will thereafter still see the pictures.  Certain  supported Internet Explorer versions may simply drop out the actual pictures and display a box; while other browsers such as Firefox and Chrome will continue to display the images. In order to help overcome this, I have posted direct jpg links to where the document pictures were first posted.  I humbly apologize  for any inconvenience this may cause.  Thanks. -- Sincerely, Brianroy) 

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Obama-tax-returs-and-e-verify_0003.jpg

Notice Obama excludes all book sale royalties, and other incoming income.

In 2009, Obama was still collecting income on book royalties and other sources.  He did NOT declare that income.Cf. Michelle Obama's posted jpg  
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Obama-tax-returs-and-e-verify_0004.jpg
with Barack's.

Not only do the Obama's use fake Birth Certificates and a stolen / identity theft SS# for Barack, they almost without question appear to be cheating on their taxes and declared income for tax year 2009.   Figures.   

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Obama-tax-returs-and-e-verify_0005.jpg

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Redacted-info-of-Linda-Jordan1.jpg

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Obama-tax-returs-and-e-verify_0007.jpg

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/affidavit-of-Orly-taitz-regarding-Obamas-SSS.gov_0004.jpg

Alex Jones jumps in on the Obama Social Security Number Fraud issue



 WND E-Verify Story cited ( by Jerome Corsi, 09/12/2011)
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=344461

 WND CEO and chief editor Joe Farah comments on the issue  (09/15/2011)
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=345181



Orly Taitz Affidavit

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/affidavit-of-Orly-taitz-regarding-Obamas-SSS.gov_0001.jpg

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/affidavit-of-Orly-taitz-regarding-Obamas-SSS.gov_0002.jpg


Felicito Papa Affidavit

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Obama-tax-returs-and-e-verify_0001.jpg
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Obama-tax-returs-and-e-verify_0002.jpg


Obama and Bauer (Identity Documents for Obama) Fraud upon the Court

The only ones guilty of committing Fraud upon the Citizens of the United States of America and upon the Court (whether it is Barack Hussein Obama II’s Birth Certificates or Social Security Number) is Barack Hussein Obama II and his lawyers under 1), 3), 4), 5) of what defines Fraud upon the Court as cited in Workman v. Bell, 245 F.3d 849 (6th Circuit 2001) @ 852.  Only a Fraud will demand a release only through Public Relations Officers, and not directly from Officers of the Court (practicing attorneys at law), and not ever allowing any claimed documents to be introduced into evidence in a Court of Law simply because they are fraudulent to begin with.

“Fraud on the Court is conduct:

1) on the part of an officer of the Court;

 2) that is directed to the judicial machinery itself;

3) that is intentionally false, willfully blind to the truth, or is in reckless disregard for the truth;

 4) that is a positive averment or a concealment when one is under duty to disclose;

5) that deceives the Court.”

 Workman v. Bell, 245 F.3d 849 (6th Circuit 2001) @ 852

Bauer and the Attorneys of Perkins Coie are already guilty of violating US Code 18 § 1028

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/18/usc_sec_18_00001028----000-.html

USC 18 § 1028. Fraud and related activity in connection with identification documents, authentication features, and information

 (a) Whoever, in a circumstance described in subsection (c) of this section—

(1) knowingly and without lawful authority produces an identification document, authentication feature, or a false identification document;

(2) knowingly transfers an identification document, authentication feature, or a false identification document knowing that such document or feature was stolen or produced without lawful authority;

(3) knowingly possesses with intent to use unlawfully or transfer unlawfully five or more identification documents (other than those issued lawfully for the use of the possessor), authentication features, or false identification documents;

(4) knowingly possesses an identification document (other than one issued lawfully for the use of the possessor), authentication feature, or a false identification document, with the intent such document or feature be used to defraud the United States;

(5) knowingly produces, transfers, or possesses a document-making implement or authentication feature with the intent such document-making implement or authentication feature will be used in the production of a false identification document or another document-making implement or authentication feature which will be so used;

(6) knowingly possesses an identification document or authentication feature that is or appears to be an identification document or authentication feature of the United States or a sponsoring entity of an event designated as a special event of national significance which is stolen or produced without lawful authority knowing that such document or feature was stolen or produced without such authority;

(7) knowingly transfers, possesses, or uses, without lawful authority, a means of identification of another person with the intent to commit, or to aid or abet, or in connection with, any unlawful activity that constitutes a violation of Federal law, or that constitutes a felony under any applicable State or local law; or

(8) knowingly traffics in false or actual authentication features for use in false identification documents, document-making implements, or means of identification;

shall be punished as provided in subsection (b) of this section. 

... 

(A) the production or transfer of an identification document, authentication feature, or false identification document that is or appears to be—

(i) an identification document or authentication feature issued by or under the authority of the United States; or

(ii) a birth certificate, or a driver’s license or personal identification card...

(5) the term “false authentication feature” means an authentication feature that— 

...

(C) appears to be genuine, but is not; 

 ...

(7) the term “means of identification” means any name or number that may be used, alone or in conjunction with any other information, to identify a specific individual, including any—

(A) name, social security number, date of birth, official State or government issued driver’s license or identification number, alien registration number, government passport number, employer or taxpayer identification number; 

....

See also: 

http://www.justice.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm01507.htm

What is it that Robert Bauer of Perkins Coie offered the Court NO EVIDENCE but referrals for the Court to simply look at newspapers and partisan (Socialist Democratic source links) the one time he even referred to any substantiation of the Obama Short Form (or any form) Birth Certificate at all in Hollister v. Soetoro Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-02254-JR?  The Short then, and the Long Form Birth Documents for Obama being fraudulent, are certainly NOT the documents a practicing attorney would dare introduce into evidence, and if legitimate Bauer had the full legal authority to introduce them into evidence while IN COURT.  

No, rather, matter of factly at a minimum by appearance,  Bauer (and the Law Firm Perkins Coie by extension)  apparently and quite successfully hung his hat on getting away with committing legally defined FRAUD upon the Court. (Cf. emboldened sections of 18 USC 1028 above).  

Hollister v. Soetoro Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-02254-JR quote:  

“1    President Obama has publicly produced a certified copy of a birth certificate showing that he was born on August 4, 1961, in Honolulu Hawaii. See, e.g., Factcheck.org, “Born in the U.S.A.: The truth about Obama’s birth certificate,” available at http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html (concluding that the birth certificate is genuine, and noting a contemporaneous birth announcement published in a Honolulu newspaper). Hawaii officials have publicly verified that they have President Obama’s “original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.” See “Certified,” Honolulu Star Bulletin, Oct. 31, 2008. This Court can take judicial notice of these public news reports. See The Washington Post v. Robinson,935 F.2d 282, 291 (D.C. Cir. 1991); Agee v. Muskie, 629 F.2d 80, 81 n.1, 90 (D.C. Cir. 1980).”

In fact, if push comes to shove, Perkins Coie will throw Judith L. Corey of Perkins Coie, assigned with being liason with the Hawaii Dept. of Heatlh 

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-correspondence.pdfunder the bus. Obama Attorney Robert Bauer (by the clearly premeditated design behind the above pdf link docs released by the White House) has his fail girl, even as Obama always has someone else to blame or take the fall for the sake of his political expediency.  In Obama's case, he can always blame Loretta Fuddy or her predecessor Dr. Neal Palifox, or his predecessor at the Hawaii Department of Health. 

Obama and Bauer are afraid to take this issue of just how much of an identity fraud he and his co-conspirators legally are committing on in a Court Trial.  They don't want people reading up on the Law, they want people like those of the Media who will drop to their knees for Obama.  Don't believe it?  Just check out his more recent ego needs statements to a partisans-only-are-invited crowd in North Carolina.  

What does Obama say?  "If you LOVE ME you gotta...."  



I don't love you Obama, and we don't gotta anything, except expose you for the felonious criminal and usurper you are (and do so legally and peacefully).