The executive power shall be vested in a President of the United States of America. He shall hold his office during the term of four years, and, together with the Vice President, chosen for the same term, be elected, as follows...
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.
In case of the removal of the President from office, or of his death, resignation, or inability to discharge the powers and duties of the said office, the same shall devolve on the Vice President, and the Congress may by law provide for the case of removal, death, resignation or inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what officer shall then act as President, and such officer shall act accordingly, until the disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.
...Before he enter on the execution of his office, he shall take the following oath or affirmation
:--"I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the record:
Piyush Amrit "Bobby" Jindal is the current Governor of Louisiana, and was born on US soil as an anchor baby on June 10, 1971, to foreign nationals, the mother having arrived in the US 6 months earlier on a student visa.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/22/world/americas/22iht-22louisiana.7991675.html?_r=1
"Piyush Jindal was born on June 10, 1971, in Baton Rouge to Hindu parents who had come to the United States six months before ..."
Like Barack Obama, without a US Citizen Father, Bobby Jindal is NOT a Constitutionally Qualified Individual to run for or hold the US Presidency.
Notice that BOTH PARENTS had only come to the US 6 months before "Bobby's" birth. Had they BOTH been naturalized US Citizens before his birth, only then, with a birth on US soil would Piyush Amrit "Bobby" Jindal qualify to seek any nomination to run as a candidate to the US Presidency. It has 100% to do with Constitutional Law, and nothing else.
I believe the man to be articulate, talented in the role of Governor, and worthy of re-election as Governor of the State of Louisiana, and a great asset to America in that capacity. He has shown himself a true patriot and intelligent and hard working individual in the wake of the BP Oil disaster, and the uncooperativeness of Obama and his cronies was and is NOT Jindal's fault.
Obama screwed not just the Republican and Roman Catholic Conservative Governor of Louisiana by intentionally refusing any input or aid to Louisiana during the BP Oil disaster earlier this year, Obama intentionally screwed the entire State of Louisiana along with any Gulf States affected by the disaster, because Obama wants to steal from and destroy America in any way opportunities come his way, and prolong and intensify any suffering and disasters he can do to America.
Although Jindal would not have the same anti-Americanism as Obama, such as one of Obama's latest exploits to give the Russians 20% of our current Uranium mines and/or uranium deposits
we must practice Constitutional Law fairly and evenly for those who are US Citizens. Those who are not US Citizens and refuse to join themselves to the US as its Citizens under Law and Oath, I would argue, although the US Constitution is a model for you to follow, it isn't yours to be protected by nor have the rights of.
And strangely enough, Obama acts exactly in that way...as though he is NOT obligated to protect and defend the US, nor to uphold any oath of loyalty to it wherever he deems it not expedient.to his Communist-Socialist overthrow of the US Republic plans (it seems to me).
Lest we forget: Obama has also previously violated America's trust in releasing reams and reams of top secret reports that aid her enemies, and hinder our intelligence gathering capabilities: on March 03, 2009, he released "Secret Bush Anti-Terror Memos", and exposed 8 years of US Intelligence gathering, the information, rate of accuracy, and a back-trail to our sources and techniques for any foreign government to use against us, and even kill and turn our intelligence sources.
Under Chicago & S. Air Lines v. Waterman S.S. Corp., 333 U.S. 103, 111 (1948) (“The President, both as Commander-in-Chief and as the Nation’s organ for foreign affairs, has available intelligence services whose reports are not and ought not to be published to the world.”). Obama has proven time and again that such legalese and patriotic obligations to the USA just doesn't suit his "plans".
It was bad enough that on May 8, 2009, we learned from the Washington Post that "Obama's Budget Eliminates New Funding for Nuclear Detection" against terrorist wishing to use dirty bombs or any nuclear devises against the US by smuggling or even openly transporting such in to commit a terrorist strike,
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/05/07/AR2009050703518.html
but now since he is unable to goad an Israeli victimization of the US by foreign Islamic terrorists (as yet), now instead...he'll be a termite or an infestation against this Republic, and give away our uranium as well as promise away another 1/3rd of our nukes to the Russians. At which delegation, in exchange for some 4500 annual shortcut flights in Russian airspace from Turkey to Afghanistan, on or about July 6, 2009, the Obama delegation agreed to abandon the Polish and Czech Missile Shield for those 4500 shortcut flights through Russian airspace to Afghanistan.
The news report appeared in places such as in Reuters, under "Obama agrees arms cuts, Afghan transit with Russia", on "Mon Jul 6, 2009 4:41pm EDT"
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSTRE5640IZ20090706?pageNumber=1&virtualBrandChannel=0&sp=true
So in light of the pro-Russian advocacy against the United States...and we haven't even touched upon the pro-Chinese, pro-Muslim, and pro-Third World anti-Americanism of Obama...where does it all end? Obama cannot help but to betray America and wish a name more highly remembered than Benedict Arnold or that of a Quisling (as regards Norway and WWII). I think that to Obama, the greater a traitor / betrayer he is, the greater a hero he is in his own mind. I believe that such is conclusive, and should be so to any fair-minded individual who can from a sanitary and unemotional detachment, as if an historian 300 years from now examining the data, reach the same conclusion...even as those who wish to judge those of Nazi Germany for not stopping Hitler in his political tracks before becoming dictator do so often judge the Germans (then and now for the 1930s-1940s) after the fact in our own day.
US Constitutional Law mandates that the obligation of The President of the United States, is that it is his legal obligation and of the highest interest of the US Government to ENSURE the Security of the USA against Foreign Enemies: Haig v. Agee, 453 U.S. 280, 307 (1981) (citing Aptheker v. Sec’y of State, 378 U.S. 500, 509 (1964)); accord Cole v. Young, 351 U.S. 536, 546 (1956). It is NOT “feel good” politics or the fulfilling of “political vendettas”. Where does giving the "green light" for the Russian Government to seize control of 20% of US Uranium assets" NOT aid America's enemies or foreign sovereignties over US National Security interests?
But since Barack Obama is NOT a US Natural Born Citizen and has by fraud usurped the US Presidency by knowing collusion and conspiracy with the Media and the DNC and other leaders, why should we expect Obama to behave any differently than the traitor to the United States of America and the Republic for which it stands that he has shown himself to be? And for THAT very reason, in Article 2.1.4, later moved to and currently Article 2.1.5., the US Constitution requires one to be a "Natural Born Citizen", born on US Soil and the child of a US Citizen Father...and only since 1934, to have a US Citizen Mother also.
Dinesh D'Souza believes Obama's hidden rage, manifest in the fruits of his actions (as I example above) is rooted in his Colonialism / anti-Colonialism view of the world, and seen through the prism of his Kenyan National father.
Introduction
Of Chapter 2
Of Chapter 3
Of Chapter 4
Of Chapter 8
Of Chapter 9
Conclusion
No comments:
Post a Comment