Those Politicians Who Harbor and Conceal Illegal Aliens
In Sanctuary Cities
Can be Federally Arrested And Convicted
To Serve Minimum Sentences Of 5 Years In Prison
Right Now.
I Call On President Trump And The Attorney General
Of The United States To Let The Arrests Of Those
Politicians Commence IMMEDIATELY.
A NEW BROOM SWEEPS CLEAN!!!
Apparently, most all of the major media, and even the alternative lesser media (which is benefiting and gaining larger viewership and readership) has been oblivious to reporting the legal side of why TRUMP is CORRECT both legally and morally on this issue in wanting secure borders and law enforcement of laws already long in place as Federally sound.
The economic soundness is also a winning argument in regard to secure borders, with multiple hundreds of billions of dollars in new revenue as well as cost savings, but that is another focus for another post. For now, just the legal aspect is awesome enough for the average person to absorb in one sitting.
So let us cite one example, as stated less specifically by the Sheriff in the interview in the above video...that President Trump can have the Department of Justice arrest any and every politician welcoming and / or sheltering illegals in their jurisdictions and see them locked up a minimum of 5 years, and under some circumstances, for LIFE. Let's look at CURRENT FEDERAL LAW.
8 U.S. Code § 1324 -
Bringing in and harboring certain aliens
@ (II)(B)(ii)
"in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(ii),
(iii), (iv), or (v)(II), be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 5
years, or both"
but it gets worse if the illegal alien KILLS... as it can be
20 years to life for the Sanctuary City Politician.
"(iii)
in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i), (ii),
(iii), (iv), or (v) during and in relation to which the person
causes serious
bodily injury (as defined in section 1365 of title 18) to, or
places in
jeopardy the life of, any person, be fined under title 18,
imprisoned not more
than 20 years, or both; and
(iv)
in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i), (ii),
(iii), (iv), or (v) resulting in the death of any person, be punished by death
or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined under title 18, or
both."
But as to the basic 5 year felony Sanctuary City Politicians
Commit that can imprison them right now, we just go back to the beginning of
the Statute.
"(a) CRIMINAL PENALTIES
(1)
(A)Any person who—
(i)
knowing that a person is an alien, brings to or attempts to
bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such person at a place
other than a designated port of entry or place other than as designated by the
Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien has received prior official
authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless
of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien;
(ii)
knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has
come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation
of law,
transports, or moves or attempts to transport or move such
alien within the
United States by means of transportation or otherwise, in
furtherance of such
violation of law;
(iii)
knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has
come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law,
conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor,
or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or
any means of transportation;
(iv)
encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in
the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such
coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law..."
Those who advocate
Sanctuary Cities for illegal aliens should excogitate along hypothetical
comparisons of a national and local level as if the same was a personal
application, a micro-application of their own demands of "no borders, no walls",
which is anarchy, ask themselves if they want these laws broken so that there
are NO BORDERS NATIONALLY, why should they demand we respect their own personal
borders or boundaries, be it of privacy or safety, and why should they be
respected to not have their homes invaded, their clothes torn off, and be
beaten and raped themselves? Why should
they not have any assets wherever they are, in a bank, in a home, at work (if
they work), et cetera, not taken whenever somebody else feels like it? They expect the same on a national scale, so
what makes them think that they should be immune on a personal scale?
In case these derelicts of intellect don't know it, anarchism
is that which pushes for the abolition of government and of all government
restraint (including those laws which PROTECT them from victimization by
others). Anarchists view violence as a
thrill, as a means to an end to grant them liberty from society and political
institutions, but when they destroy, they destroy infrastructure and political
and legal systems without replacement, while expecting others serve them with
running water, electricity, the benefits of food supplies, transportation, and
the like (as if no matter how much they destroy, it must always be there, or
burn it down, who cares...they'll go somewhere else where it is available, and
demand no consequences to them, and view victims of their stealing and killing
and destroying as NOT their moral or legal guilt or problem). The joy is in the killing, the destruction,
and the getting away with it as if an illusion of POWER, and to relish in the
memories of lawlessness and how much they destroy or kill or to be able to do
it all again and more so than before is all the trip seem they live for.
The false narrative of anarchy is good is
pushed on us by a co-opted hostile Major Media, and it needs to stop and leaders pushing that agenda need to be made legally accountable and sent to prison for their federal violations. The major media and protesters to Immigration Enforcement remain tireless oblivious and willing useful idiots for those wishing our societal destruction, and keep to the dullard narrative that alternative solutions to self-correct the ban of 5 of the same nations bombed by the Usurper Obama and one of which had a 6 month immigration ban by him in 2011, simply are too impossible to fathom. News flash for these turkey brained leftist and anarchy minded intellects:
President Trump had already picked up a phone, talked with two major
financial Islamic powers, and already established international cooperation
from them to establish 6 major refugee safe zones so that these refugees can be
close to home and safely dwell and remain in the Middle East in or near their
own home countries.
The Chicago Tribune
stated that some 60,000 to 100,000 visas were affected by the
Trump temporary ban of 7 nations until better vetting could be established. What is NOT told the public, is that the
Immigration and Naturalization Service establishes foreign vetting stations
internationally around the world into airports that fly non-stop to the United
States. Most of the American public, or
a larger than 60% majority, seem oblivious to this, and should be posed the
question during the reporting that "If it is not safe enough for the
United States to have an INS processing station of 16 to 32 officers at a
foreign airport to safely vet those flying to the United States non-stop in
that nation where they are being flown from, why should we be expected to let
anyone from that nation in unless they can first be identified as who they are
and what their intentions truly are in coming to the United States?"
On January 24, 2017, relating to footnote 4 and its sourcing,
the Government Accounting Office stated to Congress that:
"In February 2016, the Director of National Intelligence
reported that more than 36,500 foreign fighters—including more than 6,600 from
Western countries—had traveled to Syria to train with, support, or join
extremist groups, such as the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).
James R. Clapper, Director of National Intelligence, Worldwide
Threat Assessment of U.S. Intelligence Community, testimony before the Senate
Select Committee on Intelligence, 114th Cong., 2nd sess., February 9,
2016."
Further, the report also states some statistics not as yet
reported by the 6 Major (TV/Cable/Wireless - Corporate) News Media empires (owning 90% of all media directly and indirectly) and others, who will not cite examples when it destroys their
pushing anarchy and violence as bloodshed sells news, and selling news means
$$$ via viewership and increased advertising price hike generated
revenues.
There are 16 Nations that ban immigration on the basis of religion - nationality - ethnicity, and they are all Muslim, and just happen to be 6 of the 7 nations that President Trump has even just temporarily responded to in kind.
What is good for the goose is good for the "male goose" / the gander.
The distinction of the phrase means that as a man treats a woman, he ought to treat as he expects for himself. It is a Christian influence and variant of "Do unto others as you would have others do unto you." (e.g., Luke 6:31)
Islam by a culture by religious instruction out of the Quran of tribal sanctioned and nation sanctioned stealing and doing evil unto its neighbors as part of their religion, technically already by hostility taught by their religion isolate themselves and should be treated as still having such hostilities until intensified vetting above other nations already.
These 16 nations that already ban immigration on the basis of religion, nationality, and ethnicity are:
Algeria, Bangladesh, Brunei, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Malaysia, Oman, Pakistan. Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria, United Arab Emirates, and Yemen.
There are 16 Nations that ban immigration on the basis of religion - nationality - ethnicity, and they are all Muslim, and just happen to be 6 of the 7 nations that President Trump has even just temporarily responded to in kind.
What is good for the goose is good for the "male goose" / the gander.
The distinction of the phrase means that as a man treats a woman, he ought to treat as he expects for himself. It is a Christian influence and variant of "Do unto others as you would have others do unto you." (e.g., Luke 6:31)
Islam by a culture by religious instruction out of the Quran of tribal sanctioned and nation sanctioned stealing and doing evil unto its neighbors as part of their religion, technically already by hostility taught by their religion isolate themselves and should be treated as still having such hostilities until intensified vetting above other nations already.
These 16 nations that already ban immigration on the basis of religion, nationality, and ethnicity are:
Algeria, Bangladesh, Brunei, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Malaysia, Oman, Pakistan. Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria, United Arab Emirates, and Yemen.
In 2015, The GAO Report linked above cited that the
Volume Of Passengers Traveling From
Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates was
453,858
Doha, Qatar was 657,438
Panama City, Panama was 1,477,164
And in case you did not know it, Al Qaeda In Iraq or Al Nusra, which is now ISIS, was developed in and funded largely from Qatar as well as allegedly receiving logistical support out of the United Arab Emirates. If just only Qatar, with 657,438 direct to the United States passengers from an Al Qaeda and ISIS sponsoring nation, you would think that it would make common sense to set up intensified vetting as if it were a hostile power seeking to infiltrate the United States with hundreds or even thousands of the same terrorists it sponsors in Syria, as if rewarding the most bloodthirsty among them with U.S. vacations for killing so many tens of thousands of Christians and purging the Middle East in a religiously sanction form of genocide upon Christianity wherever they find them.
But maybe those numbers don't impress you. Okay. Did you know that a Combined Total of International INBOUND FLIGHTS to 3 U.S. destinations of New York’s JFK, to Miami International and to
Hawaii in 2015 amounted to 58,532,173
passenger arrivals at just these 3 United States airports with only 7,664 people being given no board recommendations
on flights beforehand from our own understaffed Immigration Officers at the departure points of all the various foreign nations inbound to these destinations? Only 7,664 stopped early, and how many more made it through with an Obama mandated minimal policy in place that requires Immigration to wink at foreigners with illegal papers? No thanks. It is time to enforce the Laws already on the books to protect America from alien invasion, and allow those legally vetted who want to profitably assimilate as fellow citizens in instead.
Recently, an activist judge
who disregards the Constitution and many U.S. Codes because he is a "Black Lives matter" and a past pro-bono Asian Refugee resettlement into the USA nut decided to misuse his position to promote anarchy and sabotage out of some sort of spite, when he should have recused himself. Judge Robarts is a jackass who should be removed from the bench and he should also have his license to practice law revoked. So just what is the legal fact regarding whether or not President Trump has legality to issue a ban, and what is the legal fact as to Judge Robarts being not just in error, but (in my editorial opinion) a seditious dirty name too vile to be stated here? Let's look at the basic legal argument that should be easy for all to comprehend, acknowledge, and honestly and carefully weigh the merits of (in their minds) and perhaps discuss intelligently and / or research for themselves.
Unlike Judge Robarts activist and anarchist promoting judgement, President of the United States (POTUS) Donald Trump has authorization not just under
U.S. Code, but under the Constitution as well to ban an inflow of foreigners (especially if
there is any reason of infiltration and invasion by any individual or
group).
For example,
"8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
(f) SUSPENSION OF ENTRY OR IMPOSITION OF RESTRICTIONS BY
PRESIDENT
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or
of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests
of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall
deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as
immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions
he may deem to be appropriate.
Whenever the Attorney General finds that a
commercial airline has failed to comply with regulations of the Attorney
General relating to requirements of airlines for the detection of fraudulent
documents used by passengers traveling to the United States (including the
training of personnel in such detection), the Attorney General may suspend the
entry of some or all aliens transported to the United States by such
airline."
For example, by mandate of the Constitution:
The United States Constitution in Article 4, Section 4
"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this
Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against
Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the
Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."
Emphasis on...
"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this
Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against
Invasion...."
The United States Constitution in Article 2, Section 1, Clause
8 states:
"Before he enter
on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or
Affirmation:—“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute
the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my
Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
It is the duty of the President to challenge any
unconstitutional authority by the Courts or anyone else that contradicts a
CLEAR and spelled out mandate of the Supreme Law of the Land --
(what the Constitution declares itself in Article 6, Clause 2
"THIS CONSTITUTION, and the Laws of the United States
which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall
be made, under the Authority of the United States, SHALL BE THE SUPREME LAW OF
THE LAND; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in
the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.")
--
and to exercise that Presidential Power authorized him by the
United States Constitution.
The Department of
Homeland Security, the Military, and all who answer to a job description of the
Federal Government are bound by oath and are legally at full liberty to obey
the President of The United States ENFORCING A CLEAR CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATE in
Article 4 Section 4 over any alleged stay by any Judge. That is a legal Constitutional Law fact, and
it needs to be shared and passed on everywhere.
And more so, when an activist judge says the laws don't apply
to prevent any alien, hostile or not from entering, he self-legislates as if
dictator and king in his overturning many other laws in promoting a state of
anarchy where those who protect and defend our borders as Law Enforcement
Agents are told to "poof" disregard:
8 U.S. Code § 1222 - Detention of aliens for physical and
mental examination
8 U.S. Code § 1225 - Inspection by immigration officers;
expedited removal of inadmissible arriving aliens....
8 U.S. Code § 1226 - Apprehension and detention of aliens
8 U.S. Code § 1226a - Mandatory detention of suspected
terrorists...
8 U.S. Code § 1227 - Deportable aliens
8 U.S. Code § 1321 - Prevention of unauthorized landing of
aliens
8 U.S. Code § 1322 - Bringing in aliens subject to denial of
admission on a health-related ground; persons liable....
8 U.S. Code § 1323 - Unlawful bringing of aliens into United
States
8 U.S. Code § 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens
8 U.S. Code § 1327 - Aiding or assisting certain aliens to
enter
and various other Federal laws already in effect. But look again at Article 6 of the U.S.
Constitution, where we are informed that
under the Supreme Law of the Land, that even as a Judge or a Court
cannot "poof" say states have no right to a Republican Form of
Government
(having an assembly of representatives, a Senate, a Judiciary,
a governor -- hence a legislative and judicial and executive division of powers
as a form of state government),
so too it follows that
a judge or judges cannot force a President to violate his oath to keep him from
carrying out his legal and oath bound obligation of protecting the states from
invasion. POTUS Trump, under the Constitution of the United States in this defense of the United States from alien invasion can LEGALLY defy
such an order from the bench by authorization directly from the Constitution of the United States, even from the U.S. Supreme Court Level, and it
would take Congress to impeach him to say otherwise, because in the instance of President Trump here, he represents the entire Executive Branch of Government by Constitutional Authorization and it would take both the Legislative and Judicial Branch together to over-ride him on what he is charged by oath to do upon entering office, sworn by oath by the Judicial Branch itself for him to carry out as his sworn duty (or be derelict in that responsibility).
[[[Update February 8, 2017
Video added:
President Trump
reads from the same Law citation as I cite above.
"8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
(f) SUSPENSION OF ENTRY OR IMPOSITION OF
RESTRICTIONS BY PRESIDENT
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any
aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to
the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period
as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of
aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any
restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. "
President Trump validates his 100% legal position
to ban
travel entry from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia,
Sudan, Syria and Yemen.
If video taken down, please refer to
http://www.infowars.com/trump-rips-leftists-judges-after-disgraceful-hearing-we-are-at-risk/
End of February 8, 2017 update]]]
No comments:
Post a Comment