Welcome! Jesus Christ is my LORD and Savior! Romans 10:9-10,13; John 3:16

[For EU visitors, I do not personally use cookies, but Google or any clickable link (if you choose to click on it) might. This is in compliance with mandatory EU notification]

I am a Natural Born United States Citizen with NO allegiance or citizenship to any nation but my own, and will use this site as a hobby place of sorts to present my own political and religious viewpoints, as a genuine Constitutional Conservative and a genuine Christian Conservative.

Thank you for coming.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Year of our LORD Jesus Christ
2017
-- As of January 20, 2017
A Sigh Of Relief With The Inauguration Of Donald John Trump as President of the United States of America, And Hope For A Prosperous Future For All United States Citizens (we who are a nation called "the melting pot of the world"). We shall be great and exceptionally great again.




Peace and Liberty. Semper Fidelis.





Tuesday, February 7, 2017

Arrest Sanctuary City Politicians Using Current Federal Law, Sentence Them 5 years To Life, And Tell The Truth About Trump Being Legally Correct On His Right To Protect States From Invasions

Those Politicians Who Harbor and Conceal Illegal Aliens 

In Sanctuary Cities

Can be Federally Arrested And Convicted 

To Serve Minimum Sentences Of  5 Years In Prison

Right Now.


I Call On President Trump And The Attorney General 

Of The United States To Let The Arrests Of Those 

Politicians Commence IMMEDIATELY.


A NEW BROOM SWEEPS CLEAN!!!





 Apparently, most all of the major media, and even the alternative lesser media (which is benefiting and gaining larger viewership and readership)  has been oblivious to reporting the legal side of why TRUMP is CORRECT both legally and morally on this issue in wanting secure borders and law enforcement of laws already long in place as Federally sound.  

The economic soundness is also a winning argument in regard to secure borders, with multiple hundreds of billions of dollars in new revenue as well as cost savings, but that is another focus for another post.  For now, just the legal aspect is awesome enough for the average person to absorb in one sitting.  

So let us cite one example, as stated less specifically by the Sheriff in the interview in the above video...that President Trump can have the Department of Justice arrest any and every politician welcoming and / or sheltering illegals in their jurisdictions and see them locked up a minimum of 5 years, and under some circumstances, for LIFE.   Let's look at CURRENT FEDERAL LAW.


8 U.S. Code § 1324  - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens
@  (II)(B)(ii)

"in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(ii), (iii), (iv), or (v)(II), be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more than 5 years, or both"

but it gets worse if the illegal alien KILLS... as it can be 20 years to life for the Sanctuary City Politician.


"(iii)

in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i), (ii),
(iii), (iv), or (v) during and in relation to which the person causes serious
bodily injury (as defined in section 1365 of title 18) to, or places in
jeopardy the life of, any person, be fined under title 18, imprisoned not more
than 20 years, or both; and


(iv)

in the case of a violation of subparagraph (A)(i), (ii), (iii), (iv), or (v) resulting in the death of any person, be punished by death or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, fined under title 18, or both."



But as to the basic 5 year felony Sanctuary City Politicians Commit that can imprison them right now, we just go back to the beginning of the Statute.


"(a) CRIMINAL PENALTIES

(1)

(A)Any person who—
(i)

knowing that a person is an alien, brings to or attempts to bring to the United States in any manner whatsoever such person at a place other than a designated port of entry or place other than as designated by the Commissioner, regardless of whether such alien has received prior official authorization to come to, enter, or reside in the United States and regardless of any future official action which may be taken with respect to such alien;


(ii)
knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has
come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law,
transports, or moves or attempts to transport or move such alien within the
United States by means of transportation or otherwise, in furtherance of such
violation of law;


(iii)

knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that an alien has come to, entered, or remains in the United States in violation of law, conceals, harbors, or shields from detection, or attempts to conceal, harbor, or shield from detection, such alien in any place, including any building or any means of transportation;


(iv)

encourages or induces an alien to come to, enter, or reside in the United States, knowing or in reckless disregard of the fact that such coming to, entry, or residence is or will be in violation of law..."


Those  who advocate Sanctuary Cities for illegal aliens should excogitate along hypothetical comparisons of a national and local level as if the same was a personal application, a micro-application of their own demands of "no borders, no walls", which is anarchy, ask themselves if they want these laws broken so that there are NO BORDERS NATIONALLY, why should they demand we respect their own personal borders or boundaries, be it of privacy or safety, and why should they be respected to not have their homes invaded, their clothes torn off, and be beaten and raped themselves?  Why should they not have any assets wherever they are, in a bank, in a home, at work (if they work), et cetera, not taken whenever somebody else feels like it?  They expect the same on a national scale, so what makes them think that they should be immune on a personal scale? 

In case these derelicts of intellect don't know it, anarchism is that which pushes for the abolition of government and of all government restraint (including those laws which PROTECT them from victimization by others).  Anarchists view violence as a thrill, as a means to an end to grant them liberty from society and political institutions, but when they destroy, they destroy infrastructure and political and legal systems without replacement, while expecting others serve them with running water, electricity, the benefits of food supplies, transportation, and the like (as if no matter how much they destroy, it must always be there, or burn it down, who cares...they'll go somewhere else where it is available, and demand no consequences to them, and view victims of their stealing and killing and destroying as NOT their moral or legal guilt or problem).   The joy is in the killing, the destruction, and the getting away with it as if an illusion of POWER, and to relish in the memories of lawlessness and how much they destroy or kill or to be able to do it all again and more so than before is all the trip seem they live for. 

The false narrative of anarchy is good is pushed on us by a co-opted hostile Major Media, and it needs to stop and leaders pushing that agenda need to be made legally accountable and sent to prison for their federal violations. The major media and protesters to Immigration Enforcement remain tireless oblivious and willing useful idiots for those wishing our societal destruction, and keep to the dullard narrative that alternative solutions to self-correct the ban of 5 of the same nations bombed by the Usurper Obama and one of which had a 6 month immigration ban by him in 2011, simply are too impossible to fathom.  News flash for these turkey brained leftist and anarchy minded intellects:
     President Trump had already picked up a phone, talked with two major financial Islamic powers, and already established international cooperation from them to establish 6 major refugee safe zones so that these refugees can be close to home and safely dwell and remain in the Middle East in or near their own home countries.  







The Chicago Tribune


stated that some 60,000 to 100,000 visas were affected by the Trump temporary ban of 7 nations until better vetting could be established.  What is NOT told the public, is that the Immigration and Naturalization Service establishes foreign vetting stations internationally around the world into airports that fly non-stop to the United States.  Most of the American public, or a larger than 60% majority, seem oblivious to this, and should be posed the question during the reporting that "If it is not safe enough for the United States to have an INS processing station of 16 to 32 officers at a foreign airport to safely vet those flying to the United States non-stop in that nation where they are being flown from, why should we be expected to let anyone from that nation in unless they can first be identified as who they are and what their intentions truly are in coming to the United States?" 



On January 24, 2017, relating to footnote 4 and its sourcing, the Government Accounting Office stated to Congress that:


"In February 2016, the Director of National Intelligence reported that more than 36,500 foreign fighters—including more than 6,600 from Western countries—had traveled to Syria to train with, support, or join extremist groups, such as the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).  

James R. Clapper, Director of National Intelligence, Worldwide Threat Assessment of U.S. Intelligence Community, testimony before the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, 114th Cong., 2nd sess., February 9, 2016."



Further, the report also states some statistics not as yet reported by the 6 Major (TV/Cable/Wireless - Corporate)  News Media empires (owning 90% of all media directly and indirectly) and others, who will not cite examples when it destroys their pushing anarchy and violence as bloodshed sells news, and selling news means $$$ via viewership and increased advertising price hike generated revenues. 

There are 16 Nations that ban immigration on the basis of religion - nationality - ethnicity, and they are all Muslim, and just happen to be 6 of the 7 nations that President Trump has even just temporarily responded to in kind. 

What is good for the goose is good for the "male goose" / the gander. 
The distinction of the phrase means that as a man treats a woman, he ought to treat as he expects for himself.  It is a Christian influence and variant of "Do unto others as you would have others do unto you."  (e.g., Luke 6:31) 

 Islam by a culture by religious instruction out of the Quran of tribal sanctioned and nation sanctioned stealing and doing evil unto its neighbors as part of their religion, technically already by hostility taught by their religion isolate themselves and should be treated as still having such hostilities until intensified vetting above other nations already.  
 These 16 nations that already ban immigration on the basis of religion, nationality, and ethnicity are:  
Algeria, Bangladesh, Brunei, Iran, Iraq, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Malaysia, Oman, Pakistan. Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria, United Arab Emirates, and Yemen.


 In 2015, The GAO Report linked above cited that the 
                  Volume Of Passengers Traveling From

Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates    was    453,858

Doha, Qatar    was      657,438

Mexico City, Mexico      was   3,352,228
Panama City, Panama    was   1,477,164

 And in case you did not know it, Al Qaeda In Iraq or Al Nusra, which is now ISIS, was developed in and funded largely from Qatar as well as allegedly receiving logistical support out of the United Arab Emirates.  If just only Qatar, with 657,438 direct to the United States passengers from an Al Qaeda and ISIS sponsoring nation, you would think that it would make common sense to set up intensified vetting as if it were a hostile power seeking to infiltrate the United States with hundreds or even thousands of the same terrorists it sponsors in Syria, as if rewarding the most bloodthirsty among them with U.S. vacations for killing so many tens of thousands of Christians and purging the Middle East in a religiously sanction form of genocide upon Christianity wherever they find them.  

But maybe those numbers don't impress you.  Okay.  Did you know that a Combined Total of International INBOUND FLIGHTS  to 3 U.S. destinations of  New York’s JFK, to Miami International and to Hawaii  in 2015 amounted to 58,532,173 passenger arrivals at just these 3 United States airports with only 7,664 people being given no board recommendations on flights beforehand from our own understaffed Immigration Officers at the departure points of all the various foreign nations inbound to these destinations?   Only 7,664 stopped early, and how many more made it through with an Obama mandated minimal policy in place that requires Immigration to wink at foreigners with illegal papers?  No thanks.  It is time to enforce the Laws already on the books to protect America from alien invasion, and allow those legally vetted who want to profitably assimilate as fellow citizens in instead.  


Recently, an activist judge  


 
who disregards the Constitution and many U.S. Codes because he is a "Black Lives matter" and a past  pro-bono Asian Refugee resettlement into the USA nut  decided to misuse his position to promote anarchy and sabotage out of some sort of spite, when he should have recused himself.  Judge Robarts is a jackass who should be removed from the bench and he should also have  his license to practice law revoked.  So just what is the legal fact regarding whether or not President Trump has legality to issue a ban, and what is the legal fact as to Judge Robarts being not just in error, but (in my editorial opinion)  a seditious dirty name too vile to be stated here?  Let's look at the basic legal argument that should be easy for all to comprehend, acknowledge,  and honestly and carefully weigh the merits of  (in their minds) and perhaps discuss intelligently and / or research for themselves.  


Unlike Judge Robarts activist and anarchist promoting judgement, President of the United States (POTUS)  Donald Trump has authorization not just under U.S. Code, but under the Constitution as well to ban an inflow of foreigners (especially  if there is any reason of infiltration and invasion by any individual or group).  

For example,

"8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
(f) SUSPENSION OF ENTRY OR IMPOSITION OF RESTRICTIONS BY PRESIDENT

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. 

Whenever the Attorney General finds that a commercial airline has failed to comply with regulations of the Attorney General relating to requirements of airlines for the detection of fraudulent documents used by passengers traveling to the United States (including the training of personnel in such detection), the Attorney General may suspend the entry of some or all aliens transported to the United States by such airline."



For example, by mandate of the Constitution:

The United States Constitution in Article 4, Section 4

"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."  



Emphasis on...

"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion...."



The United States Constitution in Article 2, Section 1, Clause 8 states:

   "Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:—“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.



It is the duty of the President to challenge any unconstitutional authority by the Courts or anyone else that contradicts a CLEAR and spelled out mandate of the Supreme Law of the Land  --



(what the Constitution declares itself in Article 6, Clause 2

"THIS CONSTITUTION, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, SHALL BE THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.") --





and to exercise that Presidential Power authorized him by the United States Constitution. 



  The Department of Homeland Security, the Military, and all who answer to a job description of the Federal Government are bound by oath and are legally at full liberty to obey the President of The United States ENFORCING A CLEAR CONSTITUTIONAL MANDATE in Article 4 Section 4 over any alleged stay by any Judge.   That is a legal Constitutional Law fact, and it needs to be shared and passed on everywhere.



And more so, when an activist judge says the laws don't apply to prevent any alien, hostile or not from entering, he self-legislates as if dictator and king in his overturning many other laws in promoting a state of anarchy where those who protect and defend our borders as Law Enforcement Agents are told to "poof" disregard:

8 U.S. Code § 1222 - Detention of aliens for physical and mental examination


8 U.S. Code § 1225 - Inspection by immigration officers; expedited removal of inadmissible arriving aliens....


8 U.S. Code § 1226 - Apprehension and detention of aliens


8 U.S. Code § 1226a - Mandatory detention of suspected terrorists...


8 U.S. Code § 1227 - Deportable aliens


8 U.S. Code § 1321 - Prevention of unauthorized landing of aliens


8 U.S. Code § 1322 - Bringing in aliens subject to denial of admission on a health-related ground; persons liable....


8 U.S. Code § 1323 - Unlawful bringing of aliens into United States

8 U.S. Code § 1324 - Bringing in and harboring certain aliens


8 U.S. Code § 1327 - Aiding or assisting certain aliens to enter



and various other Federal laws already in effect.  But look again at Article 6 of the U.S. Constitution, where we are informed that  under the Supreme Law of the Land, that even as a Judge or a Court cannot "poof" say states have no right to a Republican Form of Government

(having an assembly of representatives, a Senate, a Judiciary, a governor -- hence a legislative and judicial and executive division of powers as a form of state government),

 so too it follows that a judge or judges cannot force a President to violate his oath to keep him from carrying out his legal and oath bound obligation of protecting the states from invasion.   POTUS Trump, under the Constitution of the United States in this defense of the United States from alien invasion can LEGALLY defy such an order from the bench by authorization directly from the Constitution of the United States, even from the U.S. Supreme Court Level, and it would take Congress to impeach him to say otherwise, because in the instance of President Trump here, he represents the entire Executive Branch of Government by Constitutional Authorization and it would take both the Legislative and Judicial Branch together to over-ride him on what he is charged by oath to do upon entering office, sworn by oath by the Judicial Branch itself for him to carry out as his sworn duty (or be derelict in that responsibility).  











[[[Update February 8, 2017    Video added:
       President Trump reads from the same Law citation as I cite above. 

"8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
(f) SUSPENSION OF ENTRY OR IMPOSITION OF RESTRICTIONS BY PRESIDENT

Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation, and for such period as he shall deem necessary, suspend the entry of all aliens or any class of aliens as immigrants or nonimmigrants, or impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate. "


President Trump validates his 100% legal position 

to ban travel entry from Iran, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, 

Sudan, Syria and Yemen.








If video taken down, please refer to
 http://www.infowars.com/trump-rips-leftists-judges-after-disgraceful-hearing-we-are-at-risk/


https://youtu.be/CjOxitTzN7Q

End of February 8, 2017 update]]]


No comments:

Post a Comment