Donald Trump - Removes Unconstitutional Trans Pacific Global Governance Now Run By China From Trade And Treaty, And Directs Less Of A Sting Of Healthcare By Early Executive Orders

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/01/23/presidential-memorandum-regarding-withdrawal-united-states-trans-pacific

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release

January 23, 2017

Presidential Memorandum Regarding Withdrawal of the United States from the Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiations and Agreement

MEMORANDUM FOR THE UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE

SUBJECT:                    Withdrawal of the United States from the
                                     Trans-Pacific Partnership Negotiations
                                     and Agreement

It is the policy of my Administration to represent the American people and their financial well-being in all negotations, particularly the American worker, and to create fair and economically beneficial trade deals that serve their interests. Additionally, in order to ensure these outcomes, it is the intention of my Administration to deal directly with individual countries on a one-on-one (or bilateral) basis in negotiating future trade deals. Trade with other nations is, and always will be, of paramount importance to my Administration and to me, as President of the United States.

Based on these principles, and by the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, I hereby direct you to withdraw the United States as a signatory to the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), to permanently withdraw the United States from TPP negotiations, and to begin pursuing, wherever possible, bilateral trade negotiations to promote American industry, protect American workers, and raise American wages.

You are directed to provide written notification to the Parties and to the Depository of the TPP, as appropriate, that the United States withdraws as a signatory of the TPP and withdraws from the TPP negotiating process.

You are authorized and directed to publish this memorandum in the Federal Register.

DONALD J. TRUMP

See also: 

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4149076/Trump-pulls-controversial-Trans-Pacific-trade-deal.html

"...Liberty, when considered as a power, is the unrestrained power of acting reasonably: As a privilege, it is the security which a man feels in acting rightly and enjoying the fruit of his own labor. When either of these are wanting, the people are not free, although their government may be called a democracy. When these exist, the people are free...."

Atticus,  Independent Chronicle and the Universal Advertiser
Boston, Massachusetts 

August 09, 1787

https://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2017/01/2/executive-order-minimizing-economic-burden-patient-protection-and

The White House

Office of the Press Secretary

For Immediate Release

January 20, 2017

Executive Order Minimizing the Economic Burden of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act Pending Repeal

EXECUTIVE ORDER

- - - - - - -

MINIMIZING THE ECONOMIC BURDEN OF THE PATIENT PROTECTION AND AFFORDABLE CARE ACT PENDING REPEAL

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1.  It is the policy of my Administration to seek the prompt repeal of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Public Law 111-148), as amended (the "Act").  In the meantime, pending such repeal, it is imperative for the executive branch to ensure that the law is being efficiently implemented, take all actions consistent with law to minimize the unwarranted economic and regulatory burdens of the Act, and prepare to afford the States more flexibility and control to create a more free and open healthcare market.

Sec. 2.  To the maximum extent permitted by law, the Secretary of Health and Human Services (Secretary) and the heads of all other executive departments and agencies (agencies) with authorities and responsibilities under the Act shall exercise all authority and discretion available to them to waive, defer, grant exemptions from, or delay the implementation of any provision or requirement of the Act that would impose a fiscal burden on any State or a cost, fee, tax, penalty, or regulatory burden on individuals, families, healthcare providers, health insurers, patients, recipients of healthcare services, purchasers of health insurance, or makers of medical devices, products, or medications.

Sec. 3.  To the maximum extent permitted by law, the Secretary and the heads of all other executive departments and agencies with authorities and responsibilities under the Act, shall exercise all authority and discretion available to them to provide greater flexibility to States and cooperate with them in implementing healthcare programs.

Sec. 4.  To the maximum extent permitted by law, the head of each department or agency with responsibilities relating to healthcare or health insurance shall encourage the development of a free and open market in interstate commerce for the offering of healthcare services and health insurance, with the goal of achieving and preserving maximum options for patients and consumers.

Sec. 5.  To the extent that carrying out the directives in this order would require revision of regulations issued through notice-and-comment rulemaking, the heads of agencies shall comply with the Administrative Procedure Act and other applicable statutes in considering or promulgating such regulatory revisions.

Sec. 6.  (a)  Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i)   the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii)  the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b)  This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c)  This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,
    January 20, 2017.

Regarding Obamacare Forced Pay Socialism, the Court heard

DAVID KING, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. SYLVIA BURWELL, SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, ET AL.

No. 14–114. Argued March 4, 2015—Decided June 25, 2015 

http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/14pdf/14-114_qol1.pdf

   
And I have great issue with the Court even entertaining a decision that was passed by 1 minority vote against 8 in the majority, a majority of 8 that said it could NOT be interpreted as a tax, 

http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2012/06/questions-remain-on-healthcare-ruling.html

and then vote 4 for a penalty against a majority of 5 that said it could NOT be taken as a penalty, and then pretend they can have the penalty vote negate those who voted against a tax and call it a tax when they negate their own votes and at best make it a 1 for a tax against 3 that said no?  Uh huh. 

U.S. v. La Franca 282 U.S. 568 (1931) @ 572
“ A tax is an enforced contribution to provide for the support of government; a penalty …is an exaction imposed by statute as punishment for an unlawful act. The two words are not interchangeable, one for the other. No mere exercise of the art of lexicography can alter the essential nature of an act or a thing; and if an exaction be clearly a penalty it cannot be converted into a tax by the simple expedient of calling it such."

And what was that Vote again?

-- Roberts voted for it as a tax against the other 8.

-- 4 justices voted as a penalty against the other 5. It never passed.

Further, the bill is not Constitutional to tax that starts first in the U.S. Senate.  And most importantly, since Barack Obama was NEVER a United States Natural Born Citizen with sole allegiance and sole national parentage and a PROVABLE United States Birth Location admissible in a Court of Law by documentation that would not be ruled as “Fraud upon the Court”, under the Constitution of the United States, he was a usurper and the United States had NO president of the United States from 12 noon January 20, 2009 until 12 noon January 20, 2017.  

Every act of Obama is Constitutionally VOIDABLE. 

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)@

@ 176  "...   The powers of the Legislature are defined and limited; and that those limits may not be mistaken or forgotten, the Constitution is written.

@177     "… an act of the Legislature repugnant to the Constitution is void.

@178   "... the Courts are to regard the Constitution, and the Constitution is superior to any ordinary act of the Legislature...."

@179

   ... it is apparent that the framers of the Constitution

 @180

 contemplated that instrument as a rule for the government of courts, as well as of the Legislature.

...It is also not entirely unworthy of observation that, in declaring what shall be the supreme law of the land, the Constitution itself is first mentioned,

and not the laws of the United States generally,

but those only which shall be made in pursuance of the Constitution,

have that rank.

Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle,

  supposed to be essential to all written Constitutions, 

 that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void, and that courts, 

 as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument."

And Obama himself in 1995, as an attorney who visited the hospitals and bureau of vital statistics in Hawaii and as of 1995 Obama Himself admits in his auto-biography that he found NO PROOF OF BIRTH in existence in the United States for himself, and not even his ALLEGED white mother possessed a copy of his birth documents from the time of his father's early 1980s death to then in 1995 and so states:

"You know, as soon as the Old Man died,
the lawyers contacted all those who might have a claim to the inheritance.
Unlike my mum,
Ruth
has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was."
Dreams from My Father, p. 345 Barack Obama (confessing there is NO Birth Certificate of any kind for him in Hawaii as of 1995).

 President Trump should have his Attorney General revisit U.S. v. La Franca 282 U.S. 568 (1931) @ 572, the vote of the Supreme Court itself which NEVER affirm either a tax (1 for, 8 against)  nor as a penalty (4 for and 5 against). In sports as well as in politics, when one sides score less, it does NOT win the game nor PASS by vote.  

And while President Trump is at it, Obama ought to be revealed as to who he is and where he is from.   DNA is allegedly United Kingdom and Colonies Kenyan Father Barack Obama Sr. and an Indonesian woman who was daughter of Mohammed Subuh, making him a 100% foreigner at birth, who told Nicaraguan leaders he was born 3 months before the Bay of Pigs (January 1961) and not one of the reporting media cared to press the point when he said it in 2009.  

Jake Tapper and Sunlen Miller of ABC News,  http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2009/04/president-ob-20.html

and Major Garrett of Foxnews
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/04/18/obama-endures-ortega-diatribe/

 -- both reported on April 17, 2009 -- and that of Howard LaFranchi, Staff writer of the Christian Science Monitor reporting 2 days after the fact on April 19, 2009, that Obama claimed an entire different birthdate than the official 1984 Newsspeak narrative: 

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Politics/2009/0419/chummy-obama-chavez-mark-spirit-of-cooperation-at-summit

"…Obama responded disarmingly to an hour-long opening speech by Nicaraguan President Daniel Ortega, in which the former leftist revolutionary reviewed US action against Cuba including the failed Bay of Pigs invasion
. “I’m grateful President Ortega did not blame me for things that happened when I was three months old,” he told chuckling leaders."

See also: 

http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/04/obama-fec-audited-in-2011-little-bit.html

 Barry Soetoro / Barack Obama /  Soebarkah Subuh-Obama 



or whatever the hell his name really is,  should be tried as a foreign subversive in time of war who knowingly committed felony fraud and committed acts of TREASON (start with Article 4 Section 4 of the Constitution guaranteeing States against Invasion, and then the fact of what the Constitution defined as Treason in Article 3 Section 3 as the Article 6 declared Supreme Law of the Land, and apply that to how he aided and abetted the enemies of the USA in time of war against the USA if you wish), 

http://www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/initiatives_awards/constitution_day/constitution_text.html

and dealt with by trial (preferably by military tribunal) accordingly.