Welcome! Jesus Christ is my LORD and Savior! Romans 10:9-10,13; John 3:16

[For EU visitors, I do not personally use cookies, but Google or any clickable link (if you choose to click on it) might. This is in compliance with mandatory EU notification]

I am a Natural Born United States Citizen with NO allegiance or citizenship to any nation but my own, and will use this site as a hobby place of sorts to present my own political and religious viewpoints, as a genuine Constitutional Conservative and a genuine Christian Conservative.

Thank you for coming.
In the Year of our LORD Jesus Christ
-- As of January 20, 2017
A Sigh Of Relief With The Inauguration Of Donald John Trump as President of the United States of America, And Hope For A Prosperous Future For All United States Citizens (we who are a nation called "the melting pot of the world"). We shall be great and exceptionally great again.

It is likely that the entries to this blog will be less frequent than in years past. I do intend to keep this blog active, and to offer insightful information and/or opinion (and sometimes humor and/or entertainment on occasion) when I do post.

Peace and Liberty. Semper Fidelis.

Thursday, December 10, 2015

Judicial Watch Obtains Email That Affirms Islamic Slaughter By Conspiracy at Ben Ghazi, Which Opens the Door To A Mass Invasion For Islamic Slaughter in the U.S.A. In 2016 Conspiracy, Perhaps?

It has been some 15 months since we had a public airing of 3 survivors who were at Ben Ghazi, Libya, where Obama conspired with Secretary of State Hillary Clinton to MURDER a United States Ambassador using elements of Al Qaeda and Obama’s Muslim Brotherhood and to take possession of an incredible stockpile of munitions that included anti-aircraft shoulder fired missiles.  

In Washington, D.C., since January 20, 2009, it is place where those who work in and for the Federal Government are living in an alternate reality that is pushed on them by those in power, where it is as if the Laws of the United States are whatever you can get away with.  It is as if they are regularly saying among themselves, "Never mind the Constitution, U.S. Code, and all of that.  We are going to do away with all of that, but play along with those parts we require you to (for the time being)."  

From the bits and pieces I have glimpsed or been made aware of over the years, firstly there is what the public sees and how you behave as a pretender for them, often following a script of what to say and how to say it that is passed by e-mails, private videos you are linked to, seminars you must attend in person (sometimes in the guise of a formal dinner meeting), et cetera.  You will notice that when a Propaganda talking point goes out in the Major Media, there is simultaneous same expressionism in the words, phrases, language, arguments used on the public to support the agenda of the Invisible Government they sometimes seem to call the "Invisible Empire" as if the Totalitarian Communist-Socialists were occupying the language of the Ku Klux Klan and making it their own to justify their multi-racial hatred of whites, especially white conservatives who own guns, are pious, and are knowledgeable and literate regarding the United States Constitution.  

Secondly, in the more business internal political application of  contacts and fund-raising and exchanging favors and doing political wet-work, often refusing to read bills to be voted on and taking orders and being relegated to this or that Committee where privately the idea is to appear to be doing something while doing the bare minimum or nothing, this all  becomes like a Public Relations Campaign where the Constitution is viewed more and more as an obstacle that must be relegated to a piece of paper in the minds of the general public before Absolute Power or Totalitarianism can be fully seized. 

But because they are convicted of their excessive prescription drug and alcohol abuses, or of their financial corruption, or of their evil and immoral sexual activities, or of their often openly contemptuous and treasonous behavior, the ones most engaging in such things, especially frequently engaging in one or any combination of the above-mentioned,  these will be the most vehement at destroying: Christians, then Conservatives, then Veterans and gun owners.  And if they cannot personally destroy Christians, they figure to engage and arm an army of those who can,  the Muslim jihadis of Al Qaeda, who they figure will get mostly wiped out in return, and then these who set them loose will send a military force that will come in and wipe out the weakened resistance of the survivors of both as if it were a simple mopping up operation...or so that is how they expressed it privately.   Kissinger wants that military occupation force to be United Nations forces to seize and occupy the United States of America, while other factions want an internal domestic force, while another couple want Islam to dominate and be supported militarily to dominate the United States or be given the nukes and the ability to destroy it.   The Fabian Socialists were known as elites who wished to remake the world in blood and fire, by wars and violent acts of terrorism.  Winston Churchill, who actually helped draw the boundary lines of nations of the Middle East, saw the Muslims as the most likely candidates who would one day be used to carry out the same effect as  sort of a proxy army of the elites who subscribed to the same concepts as Fabian Socialism / World Totalitarianism.  The Islamic doctrine of the Shiite is to bathe the world in "fire and blood" for Islam, and to the Fabian Socialist / World Totalitarian, that is like a "through the looking glass window-door of separation" from Fabian Socialism's goal of remaking the world by "blood and fire".   The elites consider this a Yin-Yang harmony in chaos that they create, and would remain so as long as THEY are the ones who remain on top.   

The revelation on Islam's barbaric blight on human dignity and societal advancement was made clear 116 years ago by no less than Winston Churchill himself, someone who created nation boundaries for backward Middle east Muslims, who in 1899 wrote:  

“How dreadful are the curses which Mohammedanism lays on its votaries! Besides the fanatical frenzy, which is as dangerous in a man as hydrophobia in a dog, there is this fearful fatalistic apathy. The effects are apparent in many countries. Improvident habits, slovenly systems of agriculture, sluggish methods of commerce, and insecurity of property exist wherever the followers of the Prophet rule or live. A degraded sensualism deprives this life of its grace and refinement; the next of its dignity and sanctity.

The fact that in Mohammedan law every woman must belong to some man as his absolute property, either as a child, a wife, or a concubine, must delay the final extinction of slavery until the faith of Islam has ceased to be a great power among men. Individual Moslems may show splendid qualities – but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith. It has already spread throughout Central Africa, raising fearless warriors at every step; and were it not that Christianity is sheltered in the strong arms of science, the science against which it had vainly struggled, the civilisation of modern Europe might fall, as fell the civilisation of ancient Rome.”

But the problem with this is not the facts that Churchill is correct then and now, but that merely reading this aloud publicly can get you arrested in the United Kingdom for merely reading it out of his own book.  

On page 8 of Winston Churchill's "The River War" from 1899, Churchill refers to the "Soudanese" as those of arrested intellect and development who were susceptible to Islam, because “they were simple-minded savages, they lived as we may imagine prehistoric men…with no ideas beyond the gratification of their physical desires…."

And on Page 9, Churchill says that   “…the Arabs…without exception, were hunters of men.   …The warlike Arab tribes fought and brawled among themselves in ceaseless feud and strife.  …The dominion might prosper viciously till it was overthrown by some more powerful league.”

After 116 years, the Arab Muslim male on average is still backward and savage at heart because that is what his faith teaches him to be.  And those who wish to be savages, regardless of their ethnicity, that is the type of personality that will most willingly embrace Islam, because he looks more to the lusts and appeasements of the flesh and salvation of the spirit and soul by fleshly acts which he counts as faith as if the flesh were a soul or spirit in and of itself alone, it seems.  

  Regardless, it appears the lawlessness in D.C. is herding the political leadership there 
(especially from the leadership of the Republicans as well as the Totalitarian Communist Democratic leadership) 
to allow Obama to infuse America with upwards of 2,000,000 to 5,000,000 Muslims of military age.  There appears to be almost a consensus, unconfirmed at this time, that perhaps the Department of Homeland security itself will be ordered to arm and supply over 1 billion rounds of ammunition to hundreds of thousands of these jihadi Muslims (who are invaders, NOT refugees in any way), who will have been supplemented with wages in employment after a sort in the form of being put on the Federal dole as refugee Social Security Relief, and who will be encouraged to start massive violent outbreaks in the tens of thousands around the nation after being shipped to every state in the United States, to act violently with then DHS supplied firearms and explosives or act privately by self-provided or mosque provided other means)  in a span of 48 to 72 hours in a designated period yet to be determined that likely will either be just previous or immediately following the November 2016 election.  

Whether this unconfirmed consensus  (or shall we say this "analysis")  is merely a "war-gaming exercise" or actual plans currently underway well before I even write about this, that will depend on whether Obama is allowed to import that 2,000,000 to 5,000,000 Muslim pseudo-refugees figure or something close to it into the United States of America, putting most of them on Social Security Assistance or some like Federal sustenance, likely at about $850 a month per person, in the next 11 months.   And these will get all that much, but seniors will be denied a cost of living increase in Social Security.  Question: Since Obama demanded anyone on Social Security be denied a Constitutional Right to own firearms, will he promise them whatever they can steal from seniors (their homes, their cars, their bank account info) they can have as long as they kill the seniors off, and that this is Obama's idea of wealth redistribution under his brand of Marxist-Leninist Totalitarian Communism?  Just wondering.

On August 1, 2012, just over a month before the Ben Ghazi murders on what is legally United States soil in Libya (which diplomatic status a U.S. Mission legally recognizes the mission in Ben Ghazi as, just like an embassy or consulate), both Reuters and the New York Times, for example, reported that Obama signed a secret order authorizing the support of the 
--what we now know to have been Al Qaeda or enemies of the United States forces we  were at war with –
  invading mostly alien "Rebel Forces" against Syria.

This ties directly into the Ben Ghazi Libya 09/11/2012 attack, and lays the blood of  those United States Citizens who died  at Ben Ghazi, Libya, because of the arms  smuggling operation by Obama's secret order on behalf of Al Qaeda…their shed blood and murders should be forever remembered  as dripping off Obama's own hands., and he should be ever remembered as a murderer who unlawfully occupied the Presidency of the United States, even though he was not a United States Citizen by birth (apparently), and the fact that he is unable to prove birth citizenship (let alone naturalization) in a United States Court of Law follows what Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia said in February 2014 to the students of the University of Hawaii.   

"In times of war, the laws fall silent."

-- Brianroy


DECEMBER 08, 2015

“They are spinning up as we speak.” 

U.S. Department of Defense Chief of Staff Jeremy Bash 
Tuesday, September 11, 2012, 7:19 PM

(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch today released a new Benghazi email from then-Department of Defense Chief of Staff Jeremy Bash to State Department leadership immediately offering “forces that could move to Benghazi” during the terrorist attack on the U.S. Special Mission Compound in Benghazi, Libya on September 11, 2012. In an email sent to top Department of State officials, at 7:19 p.m. ET, only hours after the attack had begun, Bash says, “we have identified the forces that could move to Benghazi. They are spinning up as we speak.” The Obama administration redacted the details of the military forces available, oddly citing a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) exemption that allows the withholding of “deliberative process” information.

Bash’s email seems to directly contradict testimony given by then-Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta before the Senate Armed Services Committee in February 2013. Defending the Obama administration’s lack of military response to the nearly six-hour-long attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi, Panetta claimed that “time, distance, the lack of an adequate warning, events that moved very quickly on the ground prevented a more immediate response.”

The first assault occurred at the main compound at about 9:40 pm local time – 3:40 p.m. ET in Washington, DC.  The second attack on a CIA annex 1.2 miles away began three hours later, at about 12 am local time the following morning – 6 p.m. ET.

The newly released email reads:
From: Bash, Jeremy CIV SD [REDACTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 7:19 PM
To: Sullivan, Jacob J; Sherman, Wendy R; Nides, Thomas R
Cc: Miller, James HON OSD POLICY; Wienefeld, James A ADM JSC VCJCS; Kelly, John LtGen SD; martin, dempsey [REDACTED]

Subject: Libya 

State colleagues: 

I just tried you on the phone but you were all in with S 

[apparent reference to then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton]. 

After consulting with General Dempsey, 
General Ham and the Joint Staff, 
we have identified the forces that could move to Benghazi. 

They are spinning up as we speak.

They include a [REDACTED]. 

Assuming Principals agree to deploy these elements, 
we will ask State to procure the approval from host nation. 

Please advise how you wish to convey that approval to us 


Jacob Sullivan was Deputy Chief of Staff to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton at the time of the terrorist attack at Benghazi.  Wendy Sherman was Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs, the fourth-ranking official in the U.S. Department of State. Thomas Nides was the Deputy Secretary of State for Management and Resources.

The timing of the Bash email is particularly significant based upon testimony given to members of Congress by Gregory Hicks, Deputy Chief of Mission of the U.S. embassy in Tripoli at the time of the Benghazi terrorist attack. According to Hicks’ 2013 testimony, a show of force by the U.S. military during the siege could have prevented much of the carnage. Said Hicks, “if we had been able to scramble a fighter or aircraft or two over Benghazi as quickly as possible after the attack commenced, I believe there would not have been a mortar attack on the annex in the morning because I believe the Libyans would have split. They would have been scared to death that we would have gotten a laser on them and killed them.”

No comments:

Post a Comment