Welcome! Jesus Christ is my LORD and Savior! Romans 10:9-10,13; John 3:16

[For EU visitors, I do not personally use cookies, but Google or any clickable link (if you choose to click on it) might. This is in compliance with mandatory EU notification]

I am a Natural Born United States Citizen with NO allegiance or citizenship to any nation but my own, and will use this site as a hobby place of sorts to present my own political and religious viewpoints, as a genuine Constitutional Conservative and a genuine Christian Conservative.

Thank you for coming.
In the Year of our LORD Jesus Christ
-- As of January 20, 2017
A Sigh Of Relief With The Inauguration Of Donald John Trump as President of the United States of America, And Hope For A Prosperous Future For All United States Citizens (we who are a nation called "the melting pot of the world"). We shall be great and exceptionally great again.

It is likely that the entries to this blog will be less frequent than in years past. I do intend to keep this blog active, and to offer insightful information and/or opinion (and sometimes humor and/or entertainment on occasion) when I do post.

Peace and Liberty. Semper Fidelis.

Sunday, August 17, 2014

A Response To Allen West's Lame "Six (only six?) examples Obama is purposefully enabling the Islamist cause" Article

Recently, former Congressman and U.S. Army veteran Allen West wrote and article entitled:

 Six (only six?) examples Obama is purposefully enabling the Islamist cause

In it, as if still a scared Congressional politician, he cites only six concerns that lead him to conclude Obama just might be a Muslim working against U.S. Security Interests after all, citing these concerns:

1. The unilateral release of five senior Taliban back to the enemy while the enemy is still fighting us.
2. Providing weapons of support to the Muslim Brotherhood-led Egyptian government — F-16s and M1A1 Abrams tanks — but not to the Egyptian government after the Islamist group has been removed.
3. Negotiations with Qatar and Turkey, two Islamist-supporting countries.
4. Negotiations with Hamas, a terrorist group.
5. Returning sanction money, to the tune of billions of dollars, back to the theocratic regime led by Iran’s ayatollahs and allowing them to march on towards nuclear capability.
6. Obama’s evident support of Islamists in Libya.

Really?  It has taken Mr. West 6 years to figure out that Obama just might be a U.S. National Security problem and lists only the above? 

For your information, Mr. West, and for that matter, all who suffer from negrophobia in ever evenly criticizing Obama as they would any white Republican in the Presidency (which is racial hypocrisy), the United States Constitution classifies ANYONE, ANY ONE, who gives aid and comfort to the enemies of the United States, which Al Qaeda is, as someone who commits TREASON. {1} 

    United States Constitution, Article 3, Section 3
          Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
The Congress shall have Power to declare the Punishment of Treason, but no Attainder of Treason shall work Corruption of Blood, or Forfeiture except during the Life of the Person attainted.

Obama, by definition, is NOT nor was ever a Constitutional President, since he never was a United States Natural Born Citizen by having a foreign citizen father and multiple nationalities at birth, with NO LEGAL PROOF (cf. 533 U.S. 53 Nguyen v. INS (2001 @ pages 54, 62) 

Nguyen v. INS 533 US 53 (2001) @ 54,62
@ 54 : “The mother's relation is verifiable from the birth itself and is documented by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses to the birth.”
@62:” In the case of the mother, the relation is verifiable from the birth itself. The mother's status is documented in most instances by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses who attest to her having given birth.” 

that either he or his attorneys can offer in Court and enter into Court Evidence to back up with hard documentation that he was ever born in the United States.   When ordered in January 2012 by Judge Malihi in Georgia to produce by court order, Obama's attorneys boycotted the court until Valerie Jarrett could speak to Malihi in Atlanta in Farsi and make him back down and offer a decision based on what the judge felt, rather than what the law is.  

Iranian ethnic  Judge Michael Malihi met with fellow Iranian and also Farsi speaking Valerie Jarrett on or about Sunday January 16, 2012.  On the following day of Monday, January 17, 2012  reporters worried if Valerie Jarrett's speaking from the Pulpit on Sunday January 16, 2012 http://youtu.be/Pr4eNqUcOXw  violated IRS Regs on campaigning in the 95% pro-Obama Atlanta, Georgia, Ebenezer Baptist Church.

This Ebeneezer Baptist Church fundraising in a liberal black Church speaking engagement was taken advantage of as a cover justification for her to meet with a fellow Iranian ethnic, Judge Michael Malihi, to ask him not to cite Obama Attorney Michael Jablonski as being in contempt  by his walk out of the Court and boycotting it when subpoenaed with a Court Order to produce Obama’s alleged birth documents to the Court.   This was a year after it was made known by Hawaii Governor Abercrombie that NO documents of Obama’s birth existed in the State of Hawaii’s possession, and that there was only a single external source notation entry made in the 1980’s, with nothing from the 1960s or 1970s regarding the alleged 1961 birth.

Legal Challenge Questions regarding the Constitutional Definition of what Constitutes a United States Natural Born Citizen to be posed to the US Supreme Court

1. Is the burden of establishing a delegation of power to the United States, or the prohibition of power to the States, upon those making the claim, (such as the President of the United States, or those aspiring to such office) as stated by 333 US 640 @ 653 Bute v. Illinois (1948), a requirement under Supreme Court ruling and the Law or not?

2. Is the requirement of presenting an identification of person, and proof of birth to follow 533 US 53 @ 54 and 62 Nguyen v. INS (2001) in which both hospital records of where born and witnesses to the birth, be a partial fulfillment of 333 US 640 @ 653, in which the Court would recognize such certification as rising to the level of a jus soli claim for High Federal Office?

3. Is there a requirement in the Constitutional Article specified as 2.1.5 in which a Natural Born Citizen, and those seeking the Presidency of the United States, have sole allegiance to the United States at birth?

4. Does a Natural Born allegiance follow the condition of the nationality and citizenship of the child's father at birth or not?

5. Is the US Constitution to be understood in the natural sense per South Carolina v. United States, 199 U.S. 437 @ 448 - 450 (1905), Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U. S. 1 (1824) @ 188-189, taking also into account the influence of Vattel -- even as cited in The Venus, 12 U.S. (8 Cranch) 253 @ 289-290 (1814) -on the definitions of the framers in using "natural born citizen" in place of indigenes (indigenous) as used by Vattel?

6. Does every word of the US Constitution have its due force, as stated by Holmes v. Jennison, 39 U.S. (14 Peters) 540 @ 570-71 (1840); and is the precept of interpretation of the US Constitution to this effect, where "every word [of the US Constitution] must have its due force" active in the Rule of Law in the Supreme Court of the United States as it regards the Constitutional Article 2.1.5  "natural born citizen" clause or not?

7.  Is not the Constitutional Intent of the Constitution the following definition in which
"...the term ‘natural born citizen’ is used and excludes all persons owing allegiance by birth to foreign states”
The New Englander and Yale Law Review, Volume 3 (1845), p. 414
  or not? 

I have also shared this in detail on forums such as JTF.org, 

so that if my blog is ever taken down, there might be other places to still read this information.  But still, on every blog page, I give readers the necessary basics of the fact that Barack Hussein Obama II is NOT a United States Natural Born Citizen, and list it as a "principle" because even 2 + 2 = 4 is viewed in these evil times as an editorial opinion, not just simply fact, by those trying to destroy the newest generation of U.S. Citizens with Common Core and other evil Skinnerian cored subjugation mind control programs.

Once you understand, that by operation of Constitutional Law that Obama is illegal, you can then accept that he is intentionally committing asymmetrical warfare for Islam on the United States by nuclear weapons emasculation, giving away its top most nuclear weapons secrets to Russia and others, proselytizing the Executive Branch of Government to Islam or Islamic Sharia compliance,  truly materially and financially committing Constitutional (Article 3 Section 3) Treason   

    United States Constitution, Article 3, Section 3
          Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort.
supporting Al Qaeda and various Al Qaeda factions the United States is still legally at war with, whose side benefit to Obama is to commit religious or jihadi genocide on Middle East Christians in Iraq and Syria as he commits dozens of anti-Constitutional actions here in the United States to attempt to strip the First and Second and Fourth Amendment rights of U.S. Citizens, while labeling Christians and honorably discharged military veterans as terrorists, while he himself imports contagious diseases through illegal human carriers his administration traffics in and then sends to invade all the States at tax-payer expense, when a basic read of Article 4 Section 4 of the Constitution says there is a guarantee in place by that Supreme Law of the Land (Article 6) which States are to be protected against invasion.    It is all about LAW.  

People need to drop this Leftist driven negrophobia bulsh*t  regarding any criticism of Obama  which irrational (1984ish) group-think or anti-Constitutional consensus prohibits even the bare mention of criticism of Obama under the pseudo-psychology of deeming even blacks as racist or no longer black if they criticize Obama, let alone the fake racism charges they call anyone not black criticizing the usurper to the Presidency,  and get over Obama's skin color, and demand Obama the usurper be impeached, and that the verdict be the maximum penalty Congress and the Chief Justice can dish out, and nothing less.  It starts with getting the House Judiciary Committee to find Obama impeachable. 

 The United States Constitution allows for the co-prosecution of major political parties involved in criminal Conspiracy regarding Impeachments, where it states:

Article 1:   Section 3
Judgment in Cases of Impeachment... the Party convicted shall nevertheless be liable and subject to Indictment, Trial, Judgment and Punishment, according to Law.

In fact, the Constitution views the offices of Congress, the Administrative Executive Branch appointments under a legitimate President and the office of the President and Vice-President as Offices of Honor and Trust. The mere violation of Honor, or Trust, or even egregious loss of profit to the United States, within the confines of the intent of Article 1, Section 3, could be grounds for Impeachment of the Office Holder from Federally held Office.  And if we look at the Constitution as a whole, this ability for Impeachment applies to Congress, the Presidency, and to the Justices of the United States Supreme Court.  Yes, they are ALL impeachable for violations of Honor and Trust to support and uphold the Constitution of the United States, or causing egregious profit loss to the Government of the United States.  

Personally, I am at a point where I would recommend that Obama and his co-conspirators in the Executive Branch  be impeached and prosecuted for Treason,   and then members of Congress and the United States Supreme Court who claimed a failed Affordable Healthcare Act passed by a 1 for and 8 against or by a 4 for and 5 against vote, and citizens must eventually suffer under its oppressive and tyrannical abuses of power it does not legally have; and thereafter or simultaneously shatter the existence of both the Democratic National Committee and the Republican National Committee, and dissolve it as political bodies, with its senior officers as also held criminally liable for the fraud and TREASON of Barack Hussein Obama II, who clearly was NEVER a United States Natural Born Citizen and an obvious National Security Threat who never should have been allowed to campaign even a day, a week, or a month without a formal legal challenge and denouncement that would have derailed him at the get-go.

The Constitution states that Congress, in the case of Treason, such as conspiring with Obama against the Republic and the People of the United States, is subject to arrest and removal for that TREASON against this nation.

Article 1, Section 6. The Senators and Representatives... in all Cases, except Treason, Felony and Breach of the Peace, be privileged from Arrest during their Attendance at the Session of their respective Houses, and in going to and returning from the same; and for any Speech or Debate in either House, they shall not be questioned in any other Place.

The Constitution also states in Article 1, Section 6 that:
No Senator or Representative shall, during the Time for which he was elected, be appointed to any civil Office under the Authority of the United States.

Hillary Clinton, a sitting United States Senator, was appointed United States Secretary of State.  She was succeeded by another sitting Senator, John Kerry, to that same position of United States Secretary of State.  We also have Max Baucus and others, who while members of Congress not yet finishing out their term, who also violated this provision of the Constitution and are LAW-BREAKERS, who should be denied any office of public trust or honor ever again.  

When we had the Affordable Healthcare Act rammed down our throats by a Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi Democrat controlled Congress, they chose to violate the Constitution and follow a revenue raising version of it which came from the U.S. Senate, in clear and open violation of the Constitution, which states:
     Article 1, Section 7. All Bills for raising Revenue shall originate in the House of Representatives; but the Senate may propose or concur with Amendments as on other Bills.

Regardless of whether it is a tax or criminal penalty, which are separate sources of revenue, the Senate has NO legal right under the Constitution to generate a bill or law that generates revenue.  

Further, under Article 1, Section 7, the Constitution states that:

"Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States"

and that

"Every Order, Resolution, or Vote to which the Concurrence of the Senate and House of Representatives may be necessary (except on a question of Adjournment) shall be presented to the President of the United States".  

Now if the man occupying the Presidency is a usurper, without Constitutional Right to be there, regardless of Congress calling him a title which under the Constitution he is not,

Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 413 U.S. 266 (1973) @272
It is clear, of course, that 

no Act of Congress
can authorize a violation of the Constitution

 then the Constitution is followed, and not one single bill he ever signs has any legal weight.  Not even a single one.

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)@ 180


"... in declaring what shall be the supreme law of the land, the Constitution itself is first mentioned,

 and not the laws of the United States generally,

 but those only which shall be made in pursuance of the Constitution,

have that rank.

     Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle,

supposed to be essential to all written Constitutions,

 that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void,

and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.

In Article 1, Section 9, we see the statement that:
      No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

That includes a large valuable gold necklace of Merit as bribes made both to President Bush (which by mere appearance can be viewed as his taking a physical bribe in looking the other way in regards to Barack Obama's lack of eligibility status to the United States Constitution) in the Presidential Election year of 2008, and then to Barack Obama in 2009 for being a faithful Muslim from King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, keeper of the two holy mosques of Shia and Sunni Islam.

Most of America is oblivious to the legal fact that a President, or even a presumed to be / a putative President  need only commit and be convicted of having committed misdemeanors to be removed. 

 Article 2, Section 4. 

The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.

So, even for just misdemeanors, which falls back to the issue of honor and trust listed by the Constitution in Article 1, Section 3, 

"Judgment in Cases of Impeachment ...removal from Office, and disqualification to hold and enjoy any Office of Honor, Trust or Profit under the United States....".

But we have more than charges of misdemeanors at our disposal, we have Treason in aiding and comforting Al Qaeda, and as of June 2014, we now have the violation of intentionally importing human biological contagions against the States of the United States, very often importing life-threatening diseases, plagues, insects such as ticks still attached to their human hosts,  and livestock threatening quarantinables such as hoof and mouth disease, 

all banned from importation by laws on the books and which have been for many generations.

Article IV, Section 4   states that: 

 The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence.

The Constitution, NOT corrupt or derelict Congressmen and Congresswomen, NOT  corrupt or derelict Justices of the Supreme Court, NOT a Usurper in the Presidency illegally occupying that Office...THE CONSTITUTION is the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND.  And for that utterance, anyone who believes that is labeled as a terrorist by the illegally Obama Administration, because they fear the Constitution and know they are the Law-breakers themselves.

Article 6  of the Constitution of these United States declares:

This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land

 and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwith-standing.

The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution;

To every Citizen of the United States around the world, whose loyalty is firstly to the Constitution and the Preservation of our Republic over every political party or politician"figurehead loyalty, we need YOUR help to help save America for ALL Americans for people of every color and belief system willing and wanting to protect and preserve our Constitutional Republic and the rights, freedoms, liberty, and potential for prosperity or, as the Declaration of Independence put it, preserve the same right to pursue  "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" we acquired and pass it on to those generations following us.   Please do the research, intelligently engage on this issue, and help us prevent the United States from descending into a non-Constitutional Authoritarian Regime, followed by a full Tyranny where even the Constitution and all rights are no longer even cited, and as a thing of the long ago past for another people, another time, as if an ancient culture in another place.

Semper Fidelis.

That's my input for now.  -- Brianroy



{1}  Question: Did Barack Hussein Obama II, putative (presumed) President of the United States, set forth or sign off on the giving of material aid to enemies of the United States?  Yes or No?  The answer is YES.

Question:  Is Al Qaeda, or those who were Al Qaeda in Iraq, enemies of the United States who wounded, maimed, killed members of the United States Military and waged war upon the United States?  Yes or No?  The answer is YES.   
     So why is Obama through the C.I.A. and select advisers from the U.S. Special Forces in 2012, in 2013, in 2014, arming with ground to ground and ground to air portable missiles (such as MANPADS)  and training the enemies of the United States in go-between Muslim Countries such as in Jordan and in Pakistan?

Question:  Has the United States Department of State knowing assisted and given aid and comfort to a reconstituted Al Qaeda in Iraq as Syrian "Freedom Fighters" or by any other such designation in Syria, groups the U.S. State Department itself publicly labeled as terrorists?  Yes or No? 

Question:  Can the authorization and dispensation of aid be traced to a policy that must be set forth by Obama in aiding terrorists and terrorism, and giving them material aid and comfort,  as it regards Syria or anywhere else in the world?  Yes or No? 

The Corporate Media and the Obama Administration's top people know full well all of the above questions can be answered in court by many witnesses as being in the affirmative, as being YES, Obama is guilty of TREASON against the United States of America beyond a reasonable doubt in a Court of Law or before a Trial of Impeachment (if it ever were to be charged and prosecuted).

As of 2013, no Congressman, no member of the Press, no U.S. geo-political news literate and highly informed United States Citizen can claim ignorance that Obama has committed TREASON and supports Al Qaeda.  

As I previously posted regarding this:

Global Research – Canada, claims that al-Nusra was formed in Qatar as an alliance started by the United States Central Intelligence Agency with members of Al Qaeda in Iraq.

The article is worth the read.

The U.S. Department of State labels Al-Nusra as enemies of the United States who formerly warred with us in the recent war in Iraq.

Terrorist Designations of the al-Nusrah Front as an Alias for al-Qa'ida in Iraq

Press Statement

Victoria Nuland

Department Spokesperson, Office of the Spokesperson

Washington, DC

December 11, 2012

The Department of State has amended the Foreign Terrorist Organization (FTO) and Executive Order (E.O.) 13224 designations of al-Qa’ida in Iraq (AQI) to include the following new aliases: al-Nusrah Front, Jabhat al-Nusrah, Jabhet al-Nusra, The Victory Front, and Al-Nusrah Front for the People of the Levant. The Department of State previously designated AQI as an FTO under the Immigration and Nationality Act and as a Specially Designated Global Terrorist under E.O. 13224 on October 15, 2004. The consequences of adding al-Nusrah Front as a new alias for AQI include a prohibition against knowingly providing, or attempting or conspiring to provide, material support or resources to, or engaging in transactions with, al-Nusrah Front, and the freezing of all property and interests in property of the organization that are in the United States, or come within the United States or the control of U.S. persons.

Since November 2011, al-Nusrah Front has claimed nearly 600 attacks – ranging from more than 40 suicide attacks to small arms and improvised explosive device operations – in major city centers including Damascus, Aleppo, Hamah, Dara, Homs, Idlib, and Dayr al-Zawr. During these attacks numerous innocent Syrians have been killed. Through these attacks, al-Nusrah has sought to portray itself as part of the legitimate Syrian opposition while it is, in fact, an attempt by AQI to hijack the struggles of the Syrian people for its own malign purposes. AQI emir Abu Du’a is in control of both AQI and al-Nusrah. Abu Du’a was designated by the State Department under E.O. 13224 on October 3, 2011, and by the United Nations under UN Security Council Resolution 1267 on October 5, 2011. Abu Du’a also issues strategic guidance to al-Nusrah’s emir, Abu Muhammad al-Jawlani, and tasked him to begin operations in Syria.

Al Nusrah is simply the Al Qaeda of Iraq, which fought and killed many hundreds of United States Military in Iraq, reconstituted by the Obama Administration with the help of the nations of Qatar and Saudi Arabia and once in Syria, materially supported - aided - comforted by Obama.    The use of "Freedom Fighter" by the Obama Administration in a broad designation that includes Al-Nusrah means they fight Freedom and FOR oppression.  It is the employment of misinformation semantics to dupe the Corporate Media and the general public to think in themes of how they have been trained to think, rather than in what the reality and literal interpretation is or optional definition also is. 

It is especially important that the public know that Al Nusrah IS Al Qaeda as far as the United States is concerned, and despite being labeled as a terrorist organization by the Obama Administration in December of 2012, they have and are receiving material aid and support from the Obama Administration in 2013.  Material support that is now including hundreds of military-only highest-grade bullet resistant vests, because they are on the front-lines of this war, and that material support of those who the United States Department of State labels as terrorists cannot be denied. 

 The UK Telegraph notes

on February 27, 2013, that the Obama Administration willingly admitted:

“We are examining and developing ways to accelerate the transition the Syrian people seek and deserve,” Mr Kerry said in Paris, after meeting Laurent Fabius, the French foreign minister.

And that the giving of $60,000,000 in body armor and night vision would knowingly end up with al-Nusra, because, as even the Free Syria Army said:  “… [T]he Jihadist Jabhat al-Nusra group was gaining the upper hand in the revolution.”

“The Americans are now more open to the idea of arming the revolution,” said Louay al-Mokdad, a spokesman for the rebel army.

The New York Times Reports that the Obama Administration KNOWS  it is supporting Al Qaeda of Iraq in the form of Al-Nusra, and that those at the Department of State were whining to the effect that U.S. Aid by the Obama Administration to Al-Nusra, even that of food rations and medical supplies, was making Al-Nusra, and not the United States, make public relations inroads with some of the Syrian populace.

“The food rations and medical supplies that Secretary of State John Kerry said Thursday would be provided to the Free Syrian Army mark the first time that the United States has publicly committed itself to sending nonlethal aid to the armed factions that are battling President Bashar al-Assad.
…American officials have become increasingly concerned that the Nusra Front is making inroads among the Syrian population by dispersing assistance in the areas it controls.”

On April 13, 2013, USA Today (among others) reported that

“Washington had been providing satellite phones, SIM cards and other such equipment already, officials acknowledged, but said the level of assistance will now be increased.”

Has Obama supplied material support in the form of bullet proof vests or body armor, night vision, food, medical supplies, communications equipment to Al Qaeda in Syria under the name of Al Nusrah, a group that its own State Department labeled as enemies of the United States?  Most definitely...YES!!!

 Russia Today Reports of Obama's Al-Nusrah Forces, Who His Administration Calls "Freedom Fighters In Syria", Attempted a 2 kilogram or 4.4 lb. Sarin Gas Attack In Turkey.  

In other words, Al Nusrah have been and are still currently a terrorist organization who also plot and carry attacks against a NATO Treaty ally.  Hence, there is no way Obama's spinsters can truthfully say that Al-Nusrah in any way became a legal entity and non-terror organization since "that old State Department Press release of 6 or more months ago went out."  In other words, the activity of Treason by Obama is a definite legal reality, and his supporters should not get off with passing it as "that's just old news", the same tactic as they are nefariously using with regards to Ben Ghazi. 


Turkey finds Sarin gas in homes of suspected Syrian Islamists – reports
Published time: May 30, 2013 16:56
Edited time: May 31, 2013 12:02

 Turkish security forces found a 2kg  cylinder with sarin gas after searching the homes of Syrian militants from the Al-Qaeda linked Al-Nusra Front  who were previously detained, Turkish media reports. The gas was reportedly going to be used in a bomb.

The sarin gas was found in the homes of suspected Syrian Islamists detained in the southern provinces of Adana and Mersia following a search by Turkish police on Wednesday, reports say. The gas was allegedly going to be used to carry out an attack in the southern Turkish city of Adana.

On Monday, Turkish special anti-terror forces arrested 12 suspected members of the Al-Nusra Front, the Al-Qaeda affiliated group which has been dubbed "the most aggressive and successful arm” of the Syrian rebels. The group was designated a terrorist organization by the United States in December.

Police also reportedly found a cache of weapons, documents and digital data...

 In March, the Syrian government invited the United Nations to investigate possible chemical weapons use in the Khan al-Assal area of rural Aleppo. Military experts and officials said a chemical agent, most likely sarin, was used in the attack which killed 26 people, including government forces.

Damascus claimed Al-Qaeda linked fighters were behind the attack...

the findings of UN chemical weapons expert Carla Del Ponte ... found evidence of their use by the rebels..."... use on the part of the opposition, the rebels, not by the government authorities," Del Ponte [said]...

Exposure to ...sarin gas...causes convulsions, paralysis, loss of respiratory functions and potentially death.

Again, it is important to note that it is OBAMA's materially supported group in Syria that has used chemical weapons, and they have been caught red-handed (as it were) with the very same substance used in the chemical attack that even the United Nation's investigator finger-pointed and CORRECTLY attributed to that of the Obama sponsored rebels.   

On August 1, 2012, just over a month before  the Ben Ghazi murders on what is legally United States soil in Libya (which diplomatic status a U.S. Mission legally recognizes the mission in Ben Ghazi as, just like an embassy or consulate), Reuters reported that Obama signed a secret order authorizing the support of the invading Rebel Forces against Syria.

Exclusive: Obama authorizes secret U.S. support for Syrian rebels

By Mark Hosenball

WASHINGTON | Wed Aug 1, 2012 5:58pm EDT

(Reuters) - President Barack Obama has signed a secret order authorizing U.S. support for rebels seeking to depose Syrian President Bashar al-Assad and his government, U.S. sources familiar with the matter said.
Obama's order, approved earlier this year and known as an intelligence "finding," broadly permits the CIA and other U.S. agencies to provide support that could help the rebels oust Assad.

A U.S. government source acknowledged that under provisions of the presidential finding, the United States was collaborating with a secret command center operated by Turkey and its allies.

Last week, Reuters reported that, along with Saudi Arabia and Qatar, Turkey had established a secret base near the Syrian border to help direct vital military and communications support to Assad's opponents.

This "nerve center" is in Adana, a city in southern Turkey about 60 miles from the Syrian border, which is also home to Incirlik, a U.S. air base where U.S. military and intelligence agencies maintain a substantial presence.

Turkey's moderate Islamist government has been demanding Assad's departure with growing vehemence. Turkish authorities are said by current and former U.S. government officials to be increasingly involved in providing Syrian rebels with training and possibly equipment.

European government sources said wealthy families in Saudi Arabia and Qatar were providing significant financing to the rebels. Senior officials of the Saudi and Qatari governments have publicly called for Assad's departure.

On Tuesday, NBC News reported that the Free Syrian Army had obtained nearly two dozen surface-to-air missiles, weapons that could be used against Assad's helicopters and fixed-wing aircraft. Syrian government armed forces have employed such air power more extensively in recent days.

NBC said the shoulder-fired missiles, also known as MANPADs, had been delivered to the rebels via Turkey.

This ties directly into the Ben Ghazi Libya 09/11/2012 attack, and lays the blood of the arms smuggling operation by Obama's secret order from Ben Ghazi as dripping off Obama's own hands, even as his detractors and defenders vociferously deny it in, on, or to  the Corporate Media.

Reuters is a known credible news source.  The article also appeared in other publications, and can also be seen repeated in places such as http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/secret-order-signed-president-obama-cia-u-s-agencies-provide-support-syrian-rebels-oust-president-bashar-al-assad-reuters-article-1.1126994   if the original is ever taken down.   

No comments:

Post a Comment