Ticked Off Enough to Post An Open Letter of that essentially sent to Pamela Geller, Orly Taitz, BREITBART

 The following is the end result of one comment and two letters I sent in the last couple hours.  I think that the self-proclaimed Conservative Media have just apostatized themselves for Obama with this last openly stolen election.  

I also must herewith confess that I screwed up on my recollection of Obam in the summer of 1981 as being first in July. A specific confrontation detail between Bill Ayers and Me in August 1981 just have have now made me realize it was in early August 1981 that I argued with Obama and Ayers, a few days later Obama broke into the basement , and was almost caught...but when he came back, his friend was caught and face-punched while he came around the bushes to advocate for him when he was the one who broke in 45 minutes earlier.  I do not remember if the home owner filed a police report at the time regarding the broken cellar window, but do remember he demanded $200 for compensation from Obama and his fellow black at or about the same age as he, I recall as being only a couple inches shorter and about the same weight as well. 

 I was not privy to whether there was a pay-off or not.  But the same homeowner who had his window allegedly busted by Obama, whom I confronted inside the cellar and he used his basketball technique to do a fake out around me, that same home owner  did have his Computer small businesses in South Chicago Community Organized against and specifically targeted by vandals under Ayers teaching Obama, (according to what less than 3 weeks after Ayers later bragged to me to prove he actually does "run Chicago" which I had cussed him out previously in disbelief, and still did not find credible) and it generically received a small mention in the Evanston and Chicago Newspapers at the time.  If that time-line glitch affected any legal pursuit of Obama or in any way discouraged it, I apologize.  Obama still flew in on a British Airways flight one-way to O'Hare, and arrived at either 8:36 - 8:38 am or 9:36 - 9:38 am non-stop from Heathrow.  How hard is it for Law enforcement to simply pull July and August 1981 for a specific type of airline fight non-stop from London, on British Airways and look for Obama or one of his legal aliases in the United States Records of Names - Nationality of Passport Records?  Mike Zullo of the Maricopa County (of Arizona) Cold Case Posse was able to do the same for Ann Dunham (Obama's alleged mother) for August 1961 in Hawaii, was he not?  Good grief!

Anyrate, here is the last letter below.  I expect Pamela, as with Breitbart, to delete their copies without even considering their actions. 

If history allows Obama to overthrow the Government of the United States by taking away the Republic, I want it on record, that we were sabatoged by the alleged Conservatives as well as the active conspiratorial traitors of the Left all for destroying our Republic to replace it with something most of them even had no clue as to what evil tyranny was coming that they would dare act to help bring about and unleash upon us all...or if they did, they were useful idiots thinking themselves indispensable, but would likely be purged near the outset themselves by their own.  
---------------------

Pamela,

    

After seeing the video up at the Blaze

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/03/16/birther-queen-orly-taitz-shouted-down-at-cpac-panel/

I am infuriated at you and the other panelists for stealth appeasing Breitbart for Obama.

 {  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=awY26-jX4hM

Video added here for this blog post } 

  I just sent Breitbart a comment at

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/03/15/Breitbart-News-Uninvited-Panel-Will-Push-GOP-to-Become-One-with-Its-Base#comments

It is the ff. which I know is way too long for them to post, but briefly expresses the dissatisfaction I have with them.  My dissatisfaction also includes YOU,  because according to the video, you actively aided in shutting the discussion down.  I also sent Orly Taitz what I wrote Breitbart, and that I would also send the same to you. 

Orly Taitz was stopped from even speaking at CPAC 2013 "The Univited" by Breitbart?  What the hell is the problem with Breitbart?  It has its head so far up its own backside it can't discern that when someone bring a credible charge against Obama, they would rather side with Obama and enable totalitarianism, instead of daring to check into the charges WITHOUT bias?

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)@180 states that “a law repugnant to the constitution IS VOID. . . .” and “in declaring what shall be the SUPREME law of the land, the CONSTITUTION itself is first mentioned; and not the laws of the United States generally, but those only which shall be made in PURSUANCE of the constitution, have that rank.”   Without AMENDING the Constitution first, you cannot say a Legislature legalized what the Constitution forbids, and not be able to overturn it or throw it out later.

You might want to be aware of Fletcher v. Peck, 10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 87 (1810) @87

“The principle asserted is that one legislature is competent to repeal any act which a former legislature was competent to pass, and that one legislature cannot abridge the powers of a succeeding legislature. The correctness of this principle so far as it respects general legislation cannot be controverted. But if an act be done under a law, a succeeding legislature cannot undo it. The past cannot be recalled by the most absolute power.”

From a legal standpoint, Obama has Internationally affirmed his birth as being in Kogelo, Kenya, despite NEVER submitting into ANY U.S. Court record a proof of a United States Birth.  In May of 2009, an official Kenyan Government memo, Compiled by: Agwanda, J.O., ASDD and Comissioned by: Machage, T. N . , SDD states very clearly and absolutely unmistakably of  the ceremony attended by U.S. Ambassador Michael Ranneberger: “This was to honour the birthplace of President Barack Obama and re-dedicate the tomb of Barack Hussein Obama, Sr., the president's late father.”

http://www.wnd.com/files/110525nsisbulletin.pdf

The Supreme Court, regarding the use of Executive Orders and other claims of authority, said in regard to claims of the right of authority by a President that:

"The burden of establishing a delegation of power to the United States,or the prohibition of power to the States, is upon those making the claim."   Bute v. Illinois, 333 U.S. 640 @653 (1948)

That means it is upon Obama and/or his lawyers to produce Court admissible documents establishing his birth identity with location and witnesses to the birth (cf. Nguyen v. INS 533 US 53 (2001) @ 54,62), - -

Nguyen v. INS 533 US 53 (2001) @ 54,62 http://supreme.justia.com/us/533/53/

@ 54 : “The mother's relation is verifiable from the birth itself and is documented by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses to the birth.”

@62:” In the case of the mother, the relation is verifiable from the birth itself. The mother's status is documented in most instances by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses who attest to her having given birth.”

Obama can therefore be required by Law to produce an authentic US Hospital Birth Certificate into Court Evidence, something he has NEVER done, nor have in lawyers remotely done in the one reference they made to pro-Obama blogs in Hollister v. Soetoro Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-02254-JR.What is it that Robert Bauer of Perkins Coie offered the Court the one time he even referred to substantiation in Hollister v. Soetoro Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-02254-JR? Legal FRAUD upon the Court.

“Fraud on the Court is conduct:

1) on the part of an officer of the Court;

2) that is directed to the judicial machinery itself;

3) that is intentionally false, willfully blind to the truth, or is in reckless disregard for the truth;

4) that is a positive averment or a concealment when one is under duty to disclose;

5) that deceives the Court.”

Workman v. Bell, 245 F.3d 849 (6th Circuit 2001) @ 852

{{{Quote from Hollister v. Soetoro, Footnote 1: }}}1 President Obama has publicly produced a certified copy of a birth certificate showing that he was born on August 4, 1961, in Honolulu Hawaii. See, e.g., Factcheck.org, “Born in the U.S.A.: The truth about Obama’s birth certificate,” available at http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html (concluding that the birth certificate is genuine, and noting a contemporaneous birth announcement published in a Honolulu newspaper). Hawaii officials have publicly verified that they have President Obama’s “original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.” See “Certified,” Honolulu Star Bulletin, Oct. 31, 2008. This Court can take judicial notice of these public news reports. See The Washington Post v. Robinson,935 F.2d 282, 291 (D.C. Cir. 1991); Agee v. Muskie, 629 F.2d 80, 81 n.1, 90 (D.C. Cir. 1980). {{{Unquote}}}

Obama CANNOT and will NOT produce a valid Birth Certificate into evidence in a Court of Law because both released long and short copies ARE FORGERIES, and that is also evidenced by the one Law Enforcement Agency in the nation willing to investigate the issue,

http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2012/07/july-17-2012-maricopa-county.html

which though unwilling at first to believe the charges, found the accusations true…Obama’s released records are fake…and you at Breitbart do what?  You shut down the means and opportunity to have Obama forced out of Office fater than the Watergate Scandal did to President Nixon.

What the hell is with your  shutting down Orly Taitz at the CPAC 2013 “The Uninvited” Conference,  by refusing to even explore the issue without malice and without bias of any kind from a legal standpoint? What’s the matter?   Are Breitbart’s entire staff and guest just too osmotically stupid on the issue with no real or credible legal answers to show an intelligent and informed opinion, so you have to shut it down?   I don’t know if Andrew kept my letter, and if it helped him come over to Conservatism when I challenged him to look at the facts rather than dismiss them, and then draw his own conclusions so many years ago.  I figured he would eventually come around on this issue on his own, he did not.  I am sorry he hired morons who would rather see our nation lose its freedoms and the Bill of Rights, rather than admit Obama is the fraud that he is, and dare expose him while it actually means anything and has any kind of impact other than just an acknowledgement of shame for “would have, could have, should have” seriously checked into it, but simply wrote it off. 

----------------------

That letter was to Breitbart, but it by necessity must also include anyone, including YOU, who shields Obama, especially when you so actively helped exposed his Short Form Birth Certificate Fraud.    The man, in my presence in 1981 in Wilmette Illinois, after having spent 3 weeks in Pakistan and then 5 days on lay-over in the United Kingdom, said he is a "Marxist-Leninist".   He has not changed.  He will seek the destruction of Israel and the hurt of all Jews everywhere while advancing Islam, and YOU helped shut down the means of Water-gating his sorry ass right out of the White House if enough people would just realize its legal soundness and get behind it.  I hope you are sincere enough to admit you SHOULD have spoken up and allowed the issue even 5 minutes, with acknowledgement and thanks, and a promise to try to include more time in another setting.  Instead, you enabled someone who is attempting to be the Baraq (winged jack-ass of Mohammed) who will enable the yet unknown Iranian Shiite Mahdi to ascend into the heavens, bathe the world in blood and (nuclear) fire, and kill all the Jews and Christians of the world.  Remorse and a public apology would at least be something...and don't forget this is something you will still need to apologize for by Yom Kippur at the very least. 

Thank you for your time.

Brian.



{{{{  Update:  --          Pam responded with the ff.

You are infuriated? At what? She is entitled to her opinion but the repeated insults was bad form You support attacking Steve Bannon in that venue?

Then you and I do not agree.

I await your apology to me,


My response: 

Pamela,
    You clearly do not dispute that my factual challenge in the comment against Obama has merit.  Rather, you go off on a tangent and focus on a single word, and deny others the right to get upset at you even for a moment or a day?  Give me a break!  That is being as "thin-skinned" as Obama with Hillary -- (Woodward, Bob Obama's Wars, NY: Simon & Schuster, (c) 2010, p. 222, "The dilemma YOU face...", Woodward relates that Hillary dared say to Obama to his face, sent Obama, Gibbs, and Holbrooke into orbit over the use of the word "you" )  --  or as diversionary from the real issues at hand.   


Produce an extended video and the transcript.  Short of that, you have the source video and Blaze article I am citing from, and can forget it.  I'm not the one shutting down THE major issue that will empower Conservatives and save this Republic here.   And you and I agree that you failed to let the bigger issue to prevail or to act in any way to advance this important issue to even 5 minutes of reasonable presentation of the issue.  Short of that acknowledgement and posting of what specifically was so offensive in under a minute said by Orly Taitz to Steve Bannon, and explain why that it was so impossible that even 5 minutes could not be spent intelligently addressing an issue as important as an ILLEGAL occupant in the Presidency of the United States.  As for an apology on my part, the only one I will offer is an "I'm sorry, I am in the Right on this one."   As for more than that, I too will refrain from giving you any more than that as an acknowledgement.   

You and the rest of the Panel are at Fault for suppressing this issue because of whatever reason, whether you were unprepared and did not want to be embarrassed, or because your heart was settled on a sole topic agenda of the rightful problem threat of Islam including book sales and potential Media appearances that might be cancelled if you spoke up affirmatively on the Obama ineligibility issue, it seems to me.  When it comes down to it, "It's all about the money", isn't it?  If you do not wish to respond further, I understand.  But I do sincerely hope you will come around on this one, and at least see and understand that the very issue that can Water-Gate Obama out of the White House faster than Nixon was forced into Resignation, is being ignored by all of you, just as much as if you were intentionally part of the Media Conspiracy, when you are just doing what the Germans did when Hitler was in power, keeping their  head down, and for the most part "getting along" on other issues not directly related to challenging the State.  We know how that turned out.  Only now, we are doing what our parents and grand-parents told them immediately ff. World War II that they had no moral right to do in regard to an out of control leader like Hitler was.  Maybe we ought to have you re-watch and re-post Judgement at Nuremberg with Burt Lancaster, 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J62XvzlHelk


fast-forward to the testimony at 2:17 - 2:26 on the video
and pay attention to his testimony under oath and the reasoning he gave..."What difference does it make?  ...It is only a passing thing." or words to this effect.

I hope you will come around on this issue.  I really appreciate your other political stands, especially against the evil of Islam, but this Obama ineligibility LEGAL ISSUE can remove the furtherance of Obama and others trying to make Islam a Federal / State religion forced down all our throats within a matter of months, and IS the SINGLE Issue that we have that can legally SAVE this Republic of the United States of America.  And I would argue, if legally removed specifically on an ineligibility issue then a legal reversal by legal necessity resets the entire Federal Government's laws - rules -regulations back to January 20, 2009, as well as annihilates Obamacare, throws Kagan and Sotomayor off the Supreme Court bench, and reaps many other residual benefits for all America as well. Thanks. 
                                        --          end of Update}}}} 


[[[[[Update:  am of March 17, 2013 

Press release: Attorney Taitz discusses with former Attorney General of the U.S. Edwin Meese Obama’s use of all forged IDs and a stolen Social Security number and the cover up by the Department of Justice

http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?p=402903#comments

During the CPAC convention Attorney Orly Taitz was able to discuss the issue of Obama’s forged IDs with former Attorney General of the United States from Reagan Administration Edwin Meese who also has 30 years of experience as an intelligence officer in the U.S. military. (The photograph of Taitz handing documents to Meese was taken by Bailey Hall, Chief of Staff for Congressman Runyon)
Specifically Taitz provided Attorney General Meese a copy of Obama’s 2009 Tax Return, which was  posted by Obama on WhiteHouse.gov on April 15, 2010, PDF of which was not initially flattenned before posting, and which contains an unredacted Social Security number 042-68-4425 used by Obama in his tax returns. Taitz also provided Meese E-Verify and SSNVS reports showing that the Social Security number used by Obama was never  assigned to Obama , as such we have the most serious National security breach, an individual with a stolen Social Security number is residing in the White House.

 Taitz  advised Meese that she brought a legal challenge in the Federal Court in California and that the Holder Department of Justice appeared on behalf of the U.S. Congress seeking to dismiss the case, presenting to the judge that the U.S. Congress does not want the court to adjudicate on the merits. 

Taitz related to  Meese that a number of U. S. Representatives and U.S. Senators advised Taitz that when the Department of Justice made such statement, the U.S. Attorneys did not consult with the Congress, that the members of Congress were kept in the dark and that we have now a scandal much bigger than Watergate that involves not only the President, but also the Attorney General and the Department of Justice.

Attorney General Meese listened very attentively, he appeared more alert and attentive than many congressmen and senators, who are half his age. He stated that he will review the documents and will get back.  ...    --- 

My Comment: 

This is an example of the Courtesy that Breitbart and the panel did NOT have …the courtesy to listen when a grave legal concern was made.  The Breitbart Panel is supposed to be more involved and more informed, already knowing that Obama faked his Birth documents.   Any lay person can research and ascertain that the preponderance of the evidence

 http://www.brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/04/obama-fec-audited-in-2011-little-bit.html

http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/02/obligatory-literal-definition-of.html

http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/05/in-regard-to-natural-born-citizen-issue.html

 http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/01/obama-has-no-birth-certificate-on-file.html

http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/01/obama-confession-and-more-on-non-extant.html

(among others)

clearly shows Obama could not hold up to legal scrutiny upon challenge in a Court of Law if he were vigorously prosecuted by the Government itself, or even such as that legal proceeding we attribute to a Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court led Constitutional Trial of Impeachment by those who really go after him as the criminal he is.  Mr. Meese, who is certainly not my favorite of Attorney Generals, is still at least courteous and quite the professional...unlike the (we can only hope is a temporary) lapse of sound judgment by the Breitbart panel on this one issue.   Thanks.

   

End of  the am of March 17, 2013 Update]]]]]]]

[[[[[Update: Pm of March 17, 2013

Pamela wrote me back:

I am posting the complete video - watch it before you open your mouth without facts.

My response here, because I am now dealing with a Proverbs 24:7 situation on this issue with someone incapable of discerning a legal judgment on the facts and issue at hand.  
 
I am linking that video from Pamela
 http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2013/03/video-question-and-answer-session-uninvited-panel-at-cpac.html

and you can watch it either on her site or over at Youtube. 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xwC5VJqtTtY&feature=share&list=UUZnbZK8BNO9-JmY3vubuBhg
 I apologize in that I  am currently having technical difficulty loading it directly to this blog piece.

   I just completed a rough (first draft) transcript which essentially re-affirms that Pamela is STILL in the wrong, and is in denial.  What is worse.  She lectured the crowd for Individualism and repeatedly encouraged them to "Speak up", and as soon as the first questioner dared speak up and act on the very thing she encouraged, she became part of the Collective to shut that Individual down.  In other words, Pamela became the very evil she preached against less than 2 minutes earlier.  Apparently, the Individual isn't an Individual unless it is part of HER collective and mantras what PAM has to say?    Please fast forward to 1:19 on the video, and watch it to 4:14.  There may need to be a few minor adjustments to the transcript below, but it effectually shows what is said at "The Uninvited' Conference, even if Pam pulls the video later for whatever reason. 

        At 1:19 ff.

Pamela Gellar: 

 I wanna say something.  This is the unending and continual battle of the human condition.  This is an unending battle , it comes in a different costume,  it comes in a different cloak; but the essential battle in all of this,  through history,  is Individualism versus Collectivism.   This is the battle. 

 It, a hundred years ago it was Communism, or Stalinism; the national Socialist Workers party, Nazism; and Islam.  There is no unique soul in Islam.   This is Collectivism, the State versus the Individual.  THAT is the essence of this battle. 

 And I think that we’re losing it, I, because America has lost her way, I don’t think America understands.  I don’t think our children are taught about individual rights.  It is the key, it is the key to everything.   

And this is, YOU HAVE TO SPEAK, when people say what do I do?  

 You MUST SPEAK, YOU MUST SPEAK EVERY DAY. 

 You’re in the Bakery, you MUST SPEAK.  

I am sure that you hear things that make you wince, and you don’t say anything, NO MORE SILENCE.  SPEAK!!!

Steve Bannon:  We’re we’re we’re gonna go to questions!  Right there!  Can-Can you speak up so we hear you?

Orly Taitz:  (inaudible) evidence,  Barack Obama [Robert Spencer walks off the panel] (inaudible) 2010, posted on-line his tax returns.  (inaudible) E-verify, we down loaded it, uh,  ran it through E-Verify and (inaudible) , and guess what?   Can anybody guess what happened?  

Steve Bannon:  (speaking low into his personal microphone for the video)  Hmmpf. Bad Social Security number.

 Taitz: (continuing, as yet uninterrupted by Bannon)  He failed BOTH E-Verify and (inaudible) .

Steve Bannon:   (interrupting) OKAY.  Can we have a question?  I don’t want to stage another question.  GIVE ME A QUESTION.  I WANT Question!   Give me a question.

Taitz:  The question is that “Why YOU are refusing to talk about this issue.  If you were to show one drop of integrity on THIS issue, honestly…

Bannon: (interrupting) What’s the issue?  I can’t understand.  Answer the question.  What’s the issue?  

Taitz: Why you refusing to talk about the fact that Barack Obama is using all forged ID’s,  a social security number that was not issued to him.

Bannon:  (Talking over Taitz’s last two words “to him”)  Thank you.  So we got it.  Thank you very much.  Anyone want to answer that?  

      TIME 3:17 on the video –

Bannon: Going once, Twice?  

Pamela Gellar: I’d,  I think, I think that there’s a lot of, I think that there’s enough substance on this panel.  I mean, I mean how many , how many topics can you handle?  I mean really.  It…

Taitz begins to say something, Bannon jumps in.

Bannon: H-hang on

Pamela Gellar: I think it’s inappropriate.   [Bannon and Gellar talk over each other here] Yeah, inappropriate.  Inappropriate.  

Bannon: Look, look.  I’ll tell you what.  We want…

Taitz:  How can either of, YOU are defending Breitbart

Bannon: YES.

Taitz:  Breitbart for the last 4 ½ years,  did not write one word about …

Bannon:  Because we think, I I think pretty categorically, and I think I can talk for our editorial team,  I can CERTAINLY talk for Andrew,.  We got into a huge…

Taitz:  (inaudible)

Bannon: No, No, no, what Andrew , Andrew was very consistent on our site, Andrew was very consistent on our site.  We’re NOT a birther site.  So we thank you very much. 

Taitz: If that’s true, then you have no integrity, (drowned out by noise).

Bannon: Hang on.  Hang on.  Thank you very much.  [Taitz smiles in return, stops talking and nods her head and begins to leave]. We’ll talk out in the hall.  You had your chance so.  It sounds like the editorial committee , in the morning, on our morning calls.

Gellar gently laughing in the background.   Time on video, 4:14

Before Breitbart or Pamela go off stating that they at BREITBART did not have anything to do with birtherism at any time in the last 4 years, I would advise them to read their own May 17, 2012 piece where they published how Obama auto-biographed that he was born in Kenya.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/05/17/The-Vetting-Barack-Obama-Literary-Agent-1991-Born-in-Kenya-Raised-Indonesia-Hawaii

My blog piece at the time is at:
http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2012/05/finallyobama-is-breitbart-busted-as.html

That is my input.     Peace.

 End of Update: Pm of March 17, 2013]]]]]