January 2013. Good Grief! The Worst Is Yet To Come.

      Make no mistake about it.  The beginning of 2013 is a Transitional Time in American History where evil is on the ascendency because of mutual cooperation from most Republicans and many Democrats in Congress.  We are electing Conservatives  who, despite good intentions going in, are simply incapable of changing the system from within, and generally themselves fall prey or succumb within a period of 42 - 90 days to its influences and overwhelming culture of seduction and corruption.

The Potomac 2 Step: Promise you won't do evil, then do it anyway   
        The policies in place are the realization of the fictional term, the Potomac Two-Step.  The Potomac Two-Step is a term adopted by Tom Clancy from his time spent (in part) around Annapolis, in which those of the Office of Naval Intelligence in the Department of Cover and Deception would slip into speaking French (the same as done at C.I.A.) and talk about the two step, where you promise NOT to do something publicly, then turn around and do the very thing you promised you were not going to do.  That IS Obama.  

A Confirmation By Hillary That A New Government Is Being Built To Replace The One We Know And Live By
       January 2013 has essentially been the gradual unveiling of a nightmare society, because Congress has so acquiesced that it will only embolden Obama.  In her final speech as Secretary of State to the Council of Foreign Relations on January 31, 2013, Hillary Clinton spoke of a new infrastructure of Government in the making which will replace this one...one that is seen as a new dynamic as exciting and geometric as was the Parthenon of Greece in its day; [and then about 3 minutes later] in a world where society is seen as either Democratic or Totalitarian.  She excluded the option of there even being room for a Republic or Republicans to exist. 

 


 http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=6B3wBkYK3Es

 The Obama Administration Supports Al Qaeda of Saudi Arabia, not AQIM.  So Get Your Facts Straight: We Support Al Qaeda, But We Don't?

      The take away from the various news reports related to Ben Ghazi and the Turkish-Syrian connection, various intel, and the testimony of Hillary Clinton, is that the Obama Administration has allied itself with Saudi factionalism of Al Qaeda of the Saudi Arabian influences and then tries to make the semantic distinction about it. 

 It appears that Al Qaeda of the Magreb (AQIM), an almost exclusive Northwest African Continent factionalism of Al Qaeda, allegedly allied itself with several Iranian agents who then attacked the C.I.A. Mission in Ben Ghazi as a means to cut off the logistical head of U.S. Aid to Syrian Al-Qaeda of the Saudi Faction, which is actively engaged in revolution to overthrow Assad, a friend of Iran.    

The Obama Administration will tell us that we are not supporting Al Qaeda as a State Sponsor of Terror  because we are not supporting AQIM.  And that is semantically true only by distinction, because while the Obama is not engaged in supporting the north and northwest continent of Africa factionalism AQIM  --which has declared war on the nation of France in 2010, to which France reciprocated, which is why the French are fighting them in Mali --  the Obama Administration is indeed a State Sponsor of Terrorism by supporting Al Qaeda of Saudi Arabian Factionalism, even as their presence is all but removed in Afghanistan, so that we actively engaged in locals now affiliated with primarily many of the same Iranian nationals and affiliated Agents we were fighting with as perceived "insurgents" in Iraq.

A Promotion To Grab And Overthrow The Second Amendment:
    Please refer to the next oldest post on this blog:  http://www.brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2013/01/10-days-later-and-still-no-white-house.html



     Finally!  A Secretary of Defense Who Works For The Defense Of The World And For A Nuclear Holocaust Demise Of The United States At The Hands Of A Nuclear Armed World?
       In January 2013, we saw Barack Obama has put forth a candidate for Secretary of Defense in Chuck  “I hate Jews”  Hagel, who will push for the completion of total nuclear weapons emasculation of the United States Department of Defense Arsenals, on the premise that if we disarm, we lead by example for Rogue Nations to follow. 

  http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/hagel-u-s-should-give-up-nukes-before-rogue-nations/

Part 1
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AkFDvGo-iIg


 


Part 2:
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xf7WuY7z4l8


Excuse me, but if North Korea obtains 280 ICBMs and the USA announces we are nuclear free, why shouldn't Jong-Il launch 270 warheads and obliterate the USA once and for all?  Even more likely would be Iran, if it should have 280 warheads on ICBMs.  They would only need 10 for Israel, and their religion demands the destruction of both of us (Israel and the United States).  

  

China To Colonize And Exploit The Energy Resources of the United States Thanks to Obama
       Also in January 2013, Barack Obama has opened the door for the Chinese to buy into various U.S. energy companies to own at least one-third of the stock, with the potential to quickly be majority share-holders before the United States is set on a course to utilize its vast energy resources to enable an economic recovery in order to rob the United States of profiting off of its own energy resources and keeping the bulk of the monies as domestically earned and kept income. 

http://www.wnd.com/2013/01/obama-lets-chinese-own-u-s-energy-resources/

In other words, of all our vast resources, Obama’s Administration is for enabling to world to be parasites leeching off this nation-host, or as Colonialist Powers profiteering off of America as some sort of twisted retribution justice upon the United States according to his Communist-Socialist and Muslim ideologies. 

Even An Ex-general and Secretary of State Can Promote People To World Class Idiocy To Make Himself Feel Better For Being A Traitor Worse Than Benedict Arnold Was
       Meanwhile, fake republicans, or RINOs (Republicans In Name Only), like Colin Powell, have entered a third childhood phase, whining and sniveling (in effect) that Birthers are somehow idiotic, because what, they are  becoming too effective in their presentations?

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politics/2013/01/colin-powell-slams-idiot-presentations-by-some-republicans-urges-gop-leaders-to-speak-out-2/

Powell cannot articulate a coherent or intelligent argument using the Law, Supreme Court Cases, facts of evidence, to support or substantiate Barack Obama’s claim to legitimacy.  In fact, Powell’s assertions by name calling not only are idiotic in and of themselves, but Libertarians – Independents – Republicans alike should write Powell off as a “former patriot turned traitor”  to this nation who supports a Communist-Socialist Muslim subversive based primarily on the subjectivism  of  feelings and the excuse of Obama’s skin color as legitimizing Obama.  That, my friends, make Colin Powell the one who is truly idiotic.

---------------------------------------------------------

January 2013's Main Events at the Time

1) Obama's Inaugural Address:

I know the issues of Obama's Inaugural and of Hillary Clinton on the Ben Ghazi Hearing have been extensively covered in the Media, but for the sake of reference and Obama's motus operandi I thought I would make a few points.  

Obama's Inaugural was littered with both "in the know" as well as "cryptic" references, so that to the average reader or listener, or the average believer in Obama, the nefarious messages it contained were missed.   


http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/01/21/transcript-president-obama-2013-inaugural-address/

 Perhaps the most important two messages in his Inaugural was that Obama admitted to allying himself with Muslim Terrorists, and that he (or his speech-writer) wanted America to adapt to the idea where Obama is a King.  Not figuratively, but literally, as if a coup d'etat, an overthrow of this Republic, is soon coming, and that his followers should get used to the idea, so as to advocate it and support his overthrowing our Government so he can literally be an actual king to them.   Yikes!

In his inaugural address, Barack Obama indirectly justified his arming Al Qaeda, and helping them to overthrow nation states, as a means of being “heirs to those who won the peace and not just the war, who turned sworn enemies into the surest of friends, and we must carry those lessons into this time as well.”

Obama then went on to announce that he indeed views himself as a King. 

We will support democracy from Asia to Africa; from the Americas to the Middle East, because our interests and our conscience compel us to act on behalf of those who long for freedom. 

… We, the people, declare today that the most evident of truths – that all of us are created equal – is the star that guides us still; just as it guided our forebears through Seneca Falls [Women’s Rights], and Selma [Civil Rights], and Stonewall [Sexual Perversion / Homosexual  Rights]; just as it guided all those men and women, sung and unsung, who left footprints along this great Mall, to hear a preacher say that we cannot walk alone; to hear a King proclaim that our individual freedom is inextricably bound to the freedom of every soul on Earth.

Obama might be thought of by some as referring to Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.; but it is rather a subtle use of manipulative psychology, that of a Messianic transference of identity, where the reader is led away from history to a neo-theology, where a Preacher named King who proclaimed one thing, now finds political fulfillment in this new pseudo-Messiah , Obama, who is to be idolized and worshiped as though he were an eternal savior. 

There is NO MISTAKE in the inference.  Obama claims that our “freedom is inextricably bound to the freedom of every soul on Earth.”    But what “freedom” has Obama promoted?  Hard line Islam.   And he reverses the logic.  The Declaration of Independence says that we are BORN with INALENABLE  rights from GOD, it never says that our freedom is bound to the freedom of other souls on Earth, as if those not bound makes us imprisoned somehow.  That is Obama’s own screwy “collective salvation” theology, which is a mixture of Shia Islamic Faith in the Mahdi to bathe the world in fire and blood to save it for Islam, and some weird utopian Communist mix on how it would be politically run while Islam and Sharia Law dominates the populace that survives and repopulates the Earth, apparently.

       But even before the self-proclamation, Obama in the January 2013 Inaugural address warns all that he is a King who needs to rule and reign by “force of arms”.  And to whom would he use the powers of his office against?  Answer: All those who he views as sinners according to his Islamic Faith, for Islam indeed preaches doom and damnation and the fires of hell.  The Quran literally relishes “doom”, “doom”, “doom” in the Surah.  For a verification, we merely need refer to a March 2004 Interview of  Obama in his own words.

For the Muslim, being a Christian when deceiving unbelievers means that you are a believer of the Mahdi; i.e., that you are of the Shia (not Sunni) Faith of Islam.  Keep that in mind.

http://cathleenfalsani.com/obama-on-faith-the-exclusive-interview/

http://blog.beliefnet.com/stevenwaldman/2008/11/obamas-interview-with-cathleen.html  

       

  Cathleen Falsani, columnist with the Chicago Sun-Times reveals the core of Obama's religious and political convictions when she interviewed then State Senator  Barack Obama from 3:300 - 4:30 p.m. on Saturday March 27, 2004 at the Café Baci, 330 S. Michigan Avenue

FALSANI:
Do you believe in sin?

OBAMA:
Yes.

FALSANI:
What is sin?

OBAMA:
Being out of alignment with my values.

In other words, if YOU are out of alignment with Obama’s values, he views YOU as the sinner.

 

-----------------------------------------------------

2) The Senate's Ben Ghazi Hearing: The Interview of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton 

On  January 29, 2013, CNS News published http://cnsnews.com/news/article/hillary-clinton-will-write-memoir-deepest-regret-loss-american-lives-benghazi
the fact that Hillary Clinton (contrary to any sense of personal responsibility at the U.S. Senate Hearings last Wednesday) now, in a strange and obscure interview appearance for an out-going Secretary of State to have, regrets the loss of American lives at Ben Ghazi.  Well that she should
. 

On January 23, 2013, Hillary Clinton finally testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee as to her role and lack of responsibility manifested as 4 Americans, including a United States Ambassador  died on the September 11, 2012 attacks on – what we now know was -- our United States Government Mission and C.I.A. Annex facilities at Ben Ghazi, Libya.


 She was primarily apathetic and largely dismissive to what was happening at Ben Ghazi at the time, and according to her own testimony, Secretary of State Clinton  after being initially informed of the first attack after 4p.m. her time, was apparently totally oblivious for a minimum of at least the next 8-12 hours as to Ben Ghazi even being either a serious attack or even an event of significance at all.  


 Her focus, and that of the Classified Intelligence Teleconference Briefing during part of that interim, was more concerned about what had happened in Cairo, (where rioters jumped a U.S. Embassy wall, stole our flag, and posed as if demonstrators only on top of the embassy wall for the Media); and that such and even more serious Security could happen at embassies in India and in Indonesia.   
 That Hillary was out of the loop and A.W.O.L. in awareness that her own Ambassador was killed, is the first shocking revelation that allows us to see that the Obama Administration is so largely incompetent, that if they were Republicans the headlines would read: "Obama Administration Run Like Keystone Cops", "White House With Fingers In Mouths While Benghazi Burns", or words to this effect. 

 The Second Item of Great Significance which came forth was that while Hillary played dumb to the C.I.A.'s well publicized role of running arms to Turkey and into Syria (after first coming from Libya into Turkey for that Syrian insurgency purpose) reported some 3 months before the Ben Ghazi attacks
New York Times:  "C.I.A. Said to Aid in Steering Arms to Syrian Opposition"
                                       By Eric Schmitt   Published: June 21, 2012
http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/21/world/middleeast/cia-said-to-aid-in-steering-arms-to-syrian-rebels.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all
WASHINGTON — A small number of  C.I.A. officers are operating secretly in southern Turkey, helping allies decide which Syrian opposition fighters across the border will receive arms to fight the Syrian government, according to American officials and Arab intelligence officers. 

 Hillary gave admission that we indeed are supporting the Internal Opposition of Syria, which is especially composed of Al Qaeda affiliates, in its quest to overthrow the legitimate government of Syria.  In other words, the United States was admitted to be a direct Nation-State sponsor of terrorism.  

Hillary's idea of taking responsibility, like Obama, is to take suggestions...NOT admit she lied at any time, lamenting,
"What difference, at this point, does it make?"

What difference at this point does it make that Hillary lied, and is still lying to cover any culpability to being found incompetent in her post on the night of September 11, 2012; or that she lied to maintain the Obama Administration Conspiracy to lie and blame a video, and exhibit a pattern of nefarious behavior and to ensure that she NOT admit she personally failed in her responsibilities in any way?   She blamed the job, she effectually blamed her predecessors for not putting certain 09/ 2001 ff. "war on terror rules" in place (i.e, she transferred her guilt upon Colin Powell January 2001 - January 2005, and Condoleeza Rice  January 2005 - January 2009, 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Secretaries_of_State_of_the_United_States

and made these two her moral escape-goats). 


 

The opening questions beginning with a response to Senator Menendez, Chair of the Foreign Relations Committee, on the above video, starts at about the 28:40 mark. 

A Few Highlights of the Brief (just 2 hours) Ben Ghazi Hearing of Hillary Clinton

Response to Senator Menendez: 
 
Hillary makes the astonishing statement that most of her focus on September 11, 2012, was in regard to the Cairo Embassy, and that she spent most of the day and night at the State Department on September 11, 2012.  Effectually, at the outset, Ben Ghazi to Hillary was almost a footnote of concern.  She states that she was notified shortly after 4pm.   


Hillary says she instructed her State Department Charge' in Tripoli  to “break down the doors” of the Libyan officials to get their security support  in regard to Ben Ghazi, and left it at that.  

Her first phone call after being informed, (apparently, though not certain, but presumed to be by her Charge' in Tripoli), was to National Security Adviser Tom Donilon.  She spoke to him several times during the night.  Tom Donilon, the National Security Adviser that pollster Pat Caddell had blasted as effectually being a one man national security threat as the real Wikileaks (the massive dump of hundreds of thousands of classified and sensitive information cables - documents - videos of the Military and U.S. State Department into the public on-line sphere as a direct effort to compromise U.S. Security)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WikiLeaks

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-10757263

leaker,

http://nation.foxnews.com/national-security-leaks/2012/06/11/hannity-whos-blame-releasing-intel

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-TV/2012/06/10/Exclusive-Caddell-Names-Tom-Donilon-As-Source-For-Leaks

was spoken to by Hillary in her very first post-Tripoli notification phone call,  then in the Secure video conference that followed between the Executive Heads out of the White House, Senior Intelligence, the Department of Defense, C.I.A., to discuss all available options; and finally in the early hours of the morning.

When she had the video conference, she curiously phrases it in such a way, as that she spoke to Obama later in the evening to bring him up to date and "to hear his perspective."  "...TO HEAR HIS PERSPECTIVE."  That means in diplomatic code: "non-intervention intervention" or "do nothing diplomacy".   Obama refused to take responsibility, refused to make a decision of intervention or self-defensive action in behalf of our embassies and the mission in Ben Ghazi, and left the Americans in Ben Ghazi to die.  He would do what he does best later: give a revisionist account to change history as it really was.

Hillary states that she spoke to her Charge’ in Tripoli to get situation updates,  and when she stated that she spoke to C.I.A. director Petraeus, she leaned back as if distancing herself, and continued by saying she conferred and coordinated with his facility to get support from the C.I.A. Annex.  Clinton’s body language clearly tells us she was lying when she made that statement, and she neither conferred nor coordinated with Director Petraeus, nor sought support from the C.I.A. Annex.  Hillary, by her body language, lied to the Senate.  

Hillary also makes another glaring confession.  That she kept talking to everyone during the night, and in the early morning, which arrived 8 hours later and encompasses up to 11 or 12 hours after the initial call for help out of Ben Ghazi, she spoke with General Dempsey and Tom Donilon.  

It appears that when she realized what had just passed out of her mouth, she spoke about having empathy for the families of those who died and that notifying the families of Ambassador Stevens and Sean Smith were two of the hardest phone calls she ever had to make.   But the facts of her testimony are that for 8-10, possibly as many as 12 hours after she got the initial call that Ben Ghazi had been attacked by Rocket Propelled Grenades and Machine gun fire, and was being overwhelmed and over-run, Secretary of State Clinton did nothing but run her mouth rather than break down the doors in Washington D.C. to get a Military Rapid Deployment Response to our mission there.  

 Ben Ghazi was at or near the bottom of her list at the time, and the embassy in Cairo was at the top.  She stated that there were "so many" protests, demonstrations, acts of violence happening as far as India and Indonesia, with thousands of people putting our people around the world at risk, that clearly she was saying she was too overwhelmed when the crisis came, and did the "do nothing" policy suggested by Obama.  When the chips were down, Hillary failed the Americans who most needed her intervention at Ben Ghazi.

----------------------------------

To Senator Corker:

Senator Corker followed Senator Menendez .  In answer to Senator Corker's questions,  Hillary claimed that "...I do feel responsible....I take it very seriously...."    But when it came to that challenge for her to take responsibility later on from Senator Johnson for her lying to America intentionally, it seems that as stated earlier, taking responsibility for Hillary means gabbing to others and accepting suggestions or recommendations, and seeking more (financial) resources.  This seeking of financial resources intent came via the next Senator to question her, Senator Boxer of California.

--------------------------------------------------------------- 

To Senator Cardin: 

Senator Cardin immediately followed that of Senator Risch.  Senator Cardin verbally verified from Hillary that Hillary Clinton was NOT personally involved in the writing or advising of the talking points in which Susan Rice lied on 4 Sunday talk shows 5 days after Ben Ghazi and blamed the attack on an alleged video (an internet youtube video seen by so very few, that it seemed only the embassy in Cairo was aware of its existence until their statement was made public by national and international media as lead news stories and talking points THEY promoted). 

Senator Cardin asked Secretary of State Hillary Clinton regarding weapons in Libya, saying that we know that weapons have gotten out from Libya into Algeria...and into Syria from Libya as well (or words to this effect).  Senator Cardin then asked Secretary Clinton  about the strategy regarding this issue.
  

Her response confirmed that the United States is engaged as a nation-state sponsor of Terrorists and Terrorism under Obama;s Foreign Policy.

In response to Senator Cardin, Secretary Hillary Clinton states:

(Starting circa 1:00:01 on the above video )

“Senator, you’re absolutely right.  One of the reasons that WE and other government, ah(b), agencies were present in Ben Ghazi is exactly that.  We had a concerted effort to try to track down, and find and RECOVER, ah, as many man-pads and other, uh, very dangerous weapons as possible.    Libya was awash in weapons before the Revolution.  Obviously there were additional weapons introduced, but the VAST vast majority came out of Khadafy’s warehouses and, uh, were as they were saying, “liberated” and then, uh, went on the black market, were seized by militias, seized by – OTHER GROUPS,  uh, and have made their way out of Libya, uh into other countries in the region, AND have made their way into SYRIA ; --uh, we believe.

[AND have made their way into SYRIA – looks sternly with body language of clear knowledge as fact, which can legitimately come from a direct knowledge of an Obama Administration black ops mission to smuggle arms to Turkey to Al Qaeda “opposition forces” in Syria]

It is a RED LINE, uh, for this Administration, uh, with respect to Syria, uh, concerning the use of CHEMICAL WEAPONS.     Syria, as you probably know, in addition to having the 4^th largest army before this Revolution, um, has a very significant supply of chemical and biological weapons.

Given the instability of Syria right now, what we are trying to do is coordinate closely with a number of like-minded nations, neighbors-and-partners, uh, to be able to work, to try to prevent those from falling into the wrong hands – jihadist hands – Hizbollah hands; um,  but also to try to work with the Internal Opposition for them to understand the dangers are, are posed.

So this, um, PANDORA’S BOX, if you will, of weapons coming out of the,  uh, countries of the Middle East and North Africa IS the source of one of the biggest threats.

There is no doubt that the Algerian terrorists

[  http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2013/01/algerias-bloody-climax-obama-still-silent-after-muslim-savages-kidnap-and-execute-americans-in-the-c.html  ]

had weapons from Libya.  There’s no doubt that the Malian, uh, remnant of AQIM have weapons from Libya.” 

Hillary Clinton,  de jure, just diplomatically confessed that the goal of the Obama Administration is to coordinate efforts in Syria so as to enable Al Qaeda and its affiliates in Syria, the Internal Opposition in Syria, to access and gain control and use of Syria’s Chemical and Biological Weapons!

Yeah,  as if they would never smuggle it out and NOT try to use it on Israel, all of Western Europe, or the United States – Canada – Mexico.   By her definition, the only hands who should not have access to Libyan Weapons and Syrian biological and chemical weaponry is Hizbollah.  

-----------------------------

To Senator Casey:

       To Senator Casey she stated at 1:14:08 ff. on the video - "We had a very good relationship with the Annex in Ben Ghazi.  We helped them, they helped us."

-------------------------------

To Senator Johnson:

The Wall Street Journal rightly covered 3 prominent exchanges (that of Senator Johnson, Senator McCain, Senator Paul v. Secretary Clinton)  and offered a good initial selection of transcript excerpts in the few hours following the Hearing itself at this link: 

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2013/01/23/excerpts-heated-exchanges-at-benghazi-hearing/

 In regard to Senator Johnson's questioning, when Secretary Clinton was called upon to take responsibility for her lying about there being a protest at Ben Ghazi when she clearly knew there wasn't, and doing so for upwards of 2 weeks after the fact, Hillary Clinton refused to take the "responsibility" that she had earlier claimed she would in inference in her prepared statement she read as well as in response in direct testimony (but apparently did not mean)

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2013/01/23/transcript-secretary-state-hillary-clinton-testimony-before-senate-committee/

revealed her true feelings and thoughts to this effect in a heated emotional outburst, when she lashed out at Senator Johnson who kept asking her why she knowingly lied to America, blaming Ben Ghazi on a protest, with Clinton responding angrily and virtually yelling,

      "What difference, at this point, does it make? It is our job to figure out what happened and do everything we can to prevent it from ever happening again, Senator."

Hillary Clinton in her prepared remarks views the beginning and end of her responsibility in regard to Ben Ghazi as:

“…to implement recommendations from the Review Boards, to seek necessary resources, and to better protect our people from constantly evolving threats.  …  As Secretary, I have had no higher priority, and no greater responsibility. “

Therein lies the problem.  She, like Obama, REFUSES to take responsibility when lying or being caught in a lie.  She blames the messenger or finds another scapegoat to blame.  And she is treasonously reckless in carrying out Obama's policies to support Al Qaeda as benefactors.  

------------------------------------------------------

To Senator Flake: 

     Secretary Clinton  made the ridiculous claim that 9 days after Ben Ghazi happened, she still did not have a clear picture as to what happened at Ben Ghazi.   She claimed that before the 09/11/2012 attack (on our Ben Ghazi mission and then our annex), no one in the Department of State, or in Intelligence, or any other Agency  recommended that we close Ben Ghazi.  she then pushed off the blame in part on ambassador Stevens, whom she said  "did not take into account an attack of militants that night." Or words to this effect.  Hillary is not above throwing corpses under the wheels of the political bus, let alone those among the living.  Hmmn.  

------------------------------------------------

Senator McCain: 

  

Senator McCain's remarks are well worth quoting and preserving. 

 

Senator McCain:     

      "4 months, or months after the Benghazi tragedy ( it’s a tragedy when we lose four brave Americans),  there are many questions that are unanswered. And the answers, frankly, that you’ve given this morning are not satisfactory to me. This were you and the president made aware of the classified CABLE from Chris Stevens said that the United States consulate in Benghazi could NOT survive a sustained assault? Numerous warnings, including personally to me, about the security were unanswered or unaddressed.

It took a CNN reporter looking through the consulate to find, uh,  Chris Stevens’ last warning. When were you made aware of that CABLE? When were you made aware of the attack on the British emb--, uh, British ambassador and the assassination attempts and the closing of the consulates there?  And what actions were taken? What was the President’s activities during that seven-hour period?  On the anniversary of the worst attack in American history, September 11th, we didn’t have Department of Defense forces available for seven hours! Two brave Americans died in the last hour. With all these warnings, all these things to fight,   we didn’t have a single Department of Defense asset apparently available to come to these rescue.

I categorically reject your answer to Senator Johnson about, ‘Well, we didn’t ask these survivors, who were flown to Ramstein the NEXT DAY, that they, that this was not a spontaneous demonstration. To say that it’s because an investigation was going on?   The American people deserve to know answers, and they CERTAINLY don’t deserve FALSE answers! And the answers that were given  the American people on September 15^th,  by the ambassador to the United Nations were false!  In fact, contradicted by the CLASSIFIED information which was KEPT OUT of the secretary to the United Nations report: who, by the way, in the president’s words, had nothing to do with Ben Ghazi!  Which questions why she was sent out to start, to start with.

Why is it that the Administration still refuses to provide the full text of emails regarding the deletion of references to Al Qaeda and terrorism in the talking points?  Why do we care?  Because if the CLASSIFIED information had been included, it gives an entirely different version of events, to the American people!    In going to the American people,  and tell them, what happened, then you oughtta  have your facts straight!   Including, the Ambassador said, Quote, ‘Al Qaeda is decimated, and our consulates and embassies are secure.’  

So, here we are, 4 months later, and we still don’t have the BASIC information.  Now if you want to go out and tell the American people what happened, you should have least have interviewed the people who were THERE!  Instead of saying, ‘No, we couldn’t talk to them because an F.B.I. Investigation was going on.’  Uh, ffff, and by the way, as I said at the time, I just happened to be on ONE of those talk shows, ‘PEOPLE DON’T BRING MORTARS AND RPGs to spontaneous demonstrations!   That’s a FUNDAMENTAL!   And of course the President CONTINUED to say, days afterwards:

September the 12^th – he made a reference to “acts of terror”;

September 12^th on 60 minutes – “too early to know”;

September 20^th on Univision – “we’re still doing an investigation”;

September 24^th on the View – “we’re still doing an investigation”.  

 The President of the United States, as late as September 24^th, 2 weeks later, did NOT acknowledge that this WAS an ACT OF TERROR!   Conducted by people who were at LEAST somehow connected to, the Al Qaeda.

Finally, Madam Secretary, I strongly disagree with your depiction of what we did after Gadhafi fell. We did NOT provide the security that was needed. We did NOT help them with border security. We did NOT give them the kind of assistance that would have been necessary to help dismantle, these militias that still, to this day, remain a challenge to democracy in Libya and freedom.

You knew Chris Stevens very well, I knew him very well. I knew him on July 7th, when I went to Libya to observe the elections. And at that time, on July 7th, he expressed to me his DEEP and grave concerns about security, particularly in Ben Ghazi. And, he continued to, uh, communicate with the State Department.  And I don’t know who else was, ah, privy to those cables of his deep concern about the security there and the need for additional assistance. And I will argue , with, with, with facts that after that, uh, event took place, after the fall of Kaddafy, the Quote, “soft footprint”  was partially, to some degree, responsible for the tragedy that, that took place. The American people and the families of these four brave Americans still have NOT gotten the answers that they deserve. I hope that they will get them."

Secretary Clinton: Well, Senator, I understand your very, very strong feelings. You knew Chris; you were a friend of Chris; you were one of the staunchest supporters of the efforts to, um, dislodge uh, Kaddafi and try to give the Libyan people, um, a chance. Um, and we just have a disagreement!   We have a disagreement about, ah, what did happen and when it happened with respect to explaining, ah, the sequence of events. Ahm, we did uh, uh get to talk to the DS agents when they got back to this country; we did so. It was not before, ah,  September 15th. We had no access to the surveillance cameras for weeks, which helped to answer, ah, a number of questions.

---------------------------------

Senator (Rand) Paul:

http://blogs.wsj.com/washwire/2013/01/23/excerpts-heated-exchanges-at-benghazi-hearing/
 

As stated at the opening, the New York Times, a regular read at the Department of State as well as throughout the leaders of the Democratic Party, set them abuzz in June 2012 with the claim of arms shipments by the CIA under Obama to Syria. 

New York Times:  "C.I.A. Said to Aid in Steering Arms to Syrian Opposition"

                                       By Eric Schmitt   Published: June 21, 2012

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/21/world/middleeast/cia-said-to-aid-in-steering-arms-to-syrian-rebels.html?_r=1&pagewanted=all

World Net Daily, a growing and widely trusted Internet News Source by ex-Field Officers in the Intelligence Community and top ranking retired Military still with established personal connections to existing top ranking military sources inside the Department of Defense, has also reported good and reliable information, including that the Obama Administration is benefacting specific Al Qaeda Affiliates inside of Syria. 

World Net Daily / WND:

Sources: Slain U.S. ambassador recruited jihadists

Egyptian officials say Stevens worked with Saudis against Assad

Published: 09/24/2012 at 9:06 PM   by  Aaron Klein

      ...Egypt has reports of collaboration between the Syrian opposition and three al-Qaida arms, including one the operates in Libya:

• Jund al-Sham, which is made up of al-Qaida militants who are Syrian, Palestinian and Lebanese;
• Jund al-Islam, which in recent years merged with Ansar al-Islam, an extremist group of Sunni Iraqis operating under the al-Qaida banner and operating in Yemen and Libya;
• Jund Ansar al-Allah, an al-Qaida group based in Gaza linked to Palestinian camps in Lebanon and Syria.

--------------------------------- 

Did White House just expose another Rice lie?

Administration's explanation raises more questions about Benghazi

Published:11/19/2012 at 8:56 PM  by Aaron Klein

-----------------------------------

Does Benghazi probe drop unintentional bombshell?

Report contains clues hinting at undiplomatic activities

Published:12/20/2012 at 8:55 PM   by Aaron Klein

"...Middle Eastern security sources further described both the U.S. mission and nearby CIA annex in Benghazi as the main intelligence and planning center for U.S. aid to the rebels that was being coordinated with Turkey, Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

...The security officials divulged the building was routinely used by Stevens and others to coordinate with the Turkish, Saudi and Qatari governments on supporting the insurgencies in the Middle East, most prominently the rebels opposing Assad’s regime in Syria.

Stevens played a central role in recruiting jihadists to fight Assad’s regime in Syria, according to Egyptian security officials. 

Stevens served as a key contact with the Saudis to coordinate the recruitment by Saudi Arabia of Islamic fighters from North Africa and Libya. The jihadists were sent to Syria via Turkey to attack Assad’s forces, said the security officials.

The officials said Stevens also worked with the Saudis to send names of potential jihadi recruits to U.S. security organizations for review. Names found to be directly involved in previous attacks against the U.S., including in Iraq and Afghanistan, were ultimately not recruited by the Saudis to fight in Syria, said the officials.

In December 2012, Qatar was shipping arms into Libya, while other Arms shipments are being from Qatar into Turkey from Libya to C.I.A. officers who then dispense those same Arms to Internal Opposition Forces (especially including Al Qaeda affiliates) in Syria. 

New York Times: "U.S.-Approved Arms for Libya Rebels Fell Into Jihadis’ Hands"

By JAMES RISEN, MARK MAZZETTI and MICHAEL S. SCHMIDT

Published: December 5, 2012 

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/06/world/africa/weapons-sent-to-libyan-rebels-with-us-approval-fell-into-islamist-hands.html?pagewanted=all&_r=2&

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration secretly gave its blessing to arms shipments to Libyan rebels from Qatar last year, but American officials later grew alarmed as evidence grew that Qatar was turning some of the weapons over to Islamic militants, according to United States officials and foreign diplomats.

You would think that Hillary would at least be aware of basic Intelligence Appraisals, but when she has a relationship since 2000 with Huma Abedin



 a daughter of two top-ranking Muslim Terrorist Financial Bundlers as well as Fundamentalist Supporters of Jihad as her indispensable right-hand (rumored for years to also be Hillary's lesbian lover 

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2007/11/hillary-and-huma.html

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/jamie-glazov/the-dark-muslim-brotherhood-world-of-huma-abedin-2/

http://frontpagemag.com/2012/frank-gaffney/the-muslim-brotherhood-in-the-obama-administration/

 http://www.wnd.com/2012/08/manifesto-puts-hillary-chief-in-saudi-plot/

 http://www.shoebat.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Abedin_Affairs_with_Al_Saud_081312.pdf

 http://www.shoebat.com/documents/Huma_Brotherhood_Connections_072412.pdf

to the spurning of her husband of political cover and convenience, ex-Congressman Weiner)...then we would have to assess that whatever she says in regard to her motivation being honorable, when it comes to Hillary being an advocate for Islam and a co-conspirator to overthrow the Constitutional Republic of the United States, there is no mistake as to where her loyalties lay...with America's enemies, and in alliance with Barack Obama and others to that end.  

At any rate...that's my editorial assessment and input.

Peace.

{{{{{{{Last updated February 9, 2013.  Huma related video added}}}}}}}