Judge Malihi issued this official ruling today, Friday January 20, 2012
{Quote}
Defendant, President Barack Obama, a candidate seeking the Democratic nomination for the office of the President of the United States, has filed a motion to quash the subpoena compelling
his attendance at the hearing on January 26, 2012.
In support of his motion, Defendant argues that "if enforced, [the subpoena] requires him to interrupt duties as President of the United States" to attend a hearing in Atlanta, Georgia.
However, Defendant fails to provide any legal authority to support his motion to quash the subpoena to attend. Defendant's motion suggests that no President should be compelled to attend a Court hearing. This may be correct. But Defendant has failed to enlighten the Court with any legal authority. Specifically, Defendant has failed to cite to any legal authority evidencing why his attendance is "unreasonable or oppressive, or that the testimony... [is] irrelevant, immaterial, or cumulative and unnecessary to a party's preparation or presentation at
the hearing, or that basic fairness dictates that the subpoena should not be enforced." Ga. Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(5).
Defendant further alludes to a defect in service of the subpoena. However, the Court's rules provide for service of a subpoena upon a party, by serving the party's counsel of record. Ga.
Comp. R. & Regs. r. 616-1-2-.19(4). Thus, the argument regarding service is without merit.
Accordingly, Defendant's motion to quash is denied.
SO ORDERED, this the 20th day of January, 2012.
MICHAEL M. MALIHI, Judge
{Unquote}
A big THANK YOU to
Judge Malihi for judicial honesty and integrity, and also to Attorney
Orly Taitz for her persistence and dedication.
Attorney Orly Taitz posted her reply to the news:
It has been 3 years of 24/7/365 fight. I was defamed, viciously
maligned by so many Obots (Obama bots), pro-Obama media thugs, by a few
corrupt officials and judges. Recently even people, who claimed to be on
my side turned sides and viciously defamed me and attacked me. Among
them were Arlen Williams, Dean Haskins, owner of a blog Birther Summit,
Ben Nelson-owner of a blog Birther Report or ObamaReleaseYourRecords,
Helen Tansey -owner of a blog art2superpac and even attorneys, who
should’ve had some professional ethics. Attorneys Gary Kreep and Philip
Berg filed insane pleadings, saying that I tried to hire a hit man to
kill Lisa Liberi, legal assistant of attorney Berg and kidnap children
of a web master Lisa Ostella. It has been 3 years of total nightmare,
these people were like a pack of wild dogs attacking me and coming up
with each and every accusation in the book. Now I am vindicated. My
legal action is with merit. We are going to trial on January 26, 2012. I
issued subpoenas.
Barack Obama through his attorney Michael Jablonski filed a motion to quash my subpoena and all the other subpoenas. I was attacked yet again in this motion. Judge Malihi just issued an order. Motion to quash my subpoena was denied. Barack Obama, President of the United States will have to appear in court on January 26 and comply with my subpoena and produce all the documents, that I demanded. Interesting, that two other attorneys are representing plaintiffs on similar matters: Van Irion and Mark Hatfield. They could have an opportunity to examine Obama with me, however either because I was maligned so badly or because they were scared to press the most explosive charges, these attorneys filed motions for their cases to be severed from my case. Their motions were granted. Irion’s case will be heard first. He stated on the record, that his case will take only 10 minutes and will be limited to ascertainment if Obama is legitimate based on the precedent of Minor v Happerset. Obama will not be answering any of his questions. Second will be a case presented by attorney Hatfield. He, also, severed his case and did not issue any subpoenas. In his motion to sever he stated that he did not want to be joined in the same complaint with me, because he did not want to be part of a case, where I brought forward allegations of elections fraud and social security fraud committed by Barack Obama. Hatfield was saying that he was afraid that his clients will be prejudiced by such explosive allegations. Yesterday, after I filed an opposition to motion to quash, attorney Hatfield tried to follow suit by filing a notice to appear, however notice does not have as much of a force as a subpoena and I do not believe Obama will be complying with a notice, particularly since Hatfield’s complaint does not entail the same charges as mine. My case will be heard third.
My case will not be limited to definition of natural born based on a case Minor v Happersett. I will be also presenting a case, showing that elections fraud was committed by Barack Obama, that he is using a forged birth certificate, stolen or fraudulently obtained Social Security number and that there is no evidence to believe that the last name he is using is legally his, due to the fact, that in his mother’s passport he goes under the name Soebarkah and in his school registration in Indonesia he went by the last name Soetoro. There is no evidence of legal change of name.
I wanted to thank people who helped me along the way with donations,
who did not stick a knife in my back, like the ones mentioned before. I
am asking my supporters to donate to this work, as I am paying for
airfare and hotel of witnesses and a number of other expenses.Barack Obama through his attorney Michael Jablonski filed a motion to quash my subpoena and all the other subpoenas. I was attacked yet again in this motion. Judge Malihi just issued an order. Motion to quash my subpoena was denied. Barack Obama, President of the United States will have to appear in court on January 26 and comply with my subpoena and produce all the documents, that I demanded. Interesting, that two other attorneys are representing plaintiffs on similar matters: Van Irion and Mark Hatfield. They could have an opportunity to examine Obama with me, however either because I was maligned so badly or because they were scared to press the most explosive charges, these attorneys filed motions for their cases to be severed from my case. Their motions were granted. Irion’s case will be heard first. He stated on the record, that his case will take only 10 minutes and will be limited to ascertainment if Obama is legitimate based on the precedent of Minor v Happerset. Obama will not be answering any of his questions. Second will be a case presented by attorney Hatfield. He, also, severed his case and did not issue any subpoenas. In his motion to sever he stated that he did not want to be joined in the same complaint with me, because he did not want to be part of a case, where I brought forward allegations of elections fraud and social security fraud committed by Barack Obama. Hatfield was saying that he was afraid that his clients will be prejudiced by such explosive allegations. Yesterday, after I filed an opposition to motion to quash, attorney Hatfield tried to follow suit by filing a notice to appear, however notice does not have as much of a force as a subpoena and I do not believe Obama will be complying with a notice, particularly since Hatfield’s complaint does not entail the same charges as mine. My case will be heard third.
My case will not be limited to definition of natural born based on a case Minor v Happersett. I will be also presenting a case, showing that elections fraud was committed by Barack Obama, that he is using a forged birth certificate, stolen or fraudulently obtained Social Security number and that there is no evidence to believe that the last name he is using is legally his, due to the fact, that in his mother’s passport he goes under the name Soebarkah and in his school registration in Indonesia he went by the last name Soetoro. There is no evidence of legal change of name.
...
Make no mistake about it. This is the beginning of Watergate2 or
ObamaForgeryGate. I believe this is the second time in the U.S. history
a sitting President is ordered to comply with a subpoena, and produce
documents, which might eventually bring criminal charges to the
President and a number of high ranking individuals.
I feel extremely proud to be a part of this historic moment. I guess
an American dream is still alive, as this subpoena was issued by an
immigrant, who was raised in a communist dictatorship of the Soviet
Union and came here with one suitcase with a couple of dresses, who had
to study English, to study law at night, while working as a dentist and
raising a family with 3 children. Only in America is this possible.
Humbly,
Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ
Compliance is expected by the Court when Court convenes on January 26, 2012. Since Obama cannot prove he is a United States Natural Born Citizen, we shall see if his lawyers simply withdraw his name from the State of Georgia and voluntarily forfeit all claims to any and all possible Georgia delegates in order to circumvent the Courts. This is one possibility, but we shall have to wait and see. It could also be a BIG MONEY attempt drag out the Court Trial process into an endurance contest to drain Orly into bankruptcy. So please prayerfully
consider sending Orly a contribution of whatever amount you feel led to
give, to help assure that she has the necessary financial resources to do her part to fly in witnesses and present the best case possible. Thanks.
And again, if I may:
Please go to attorney Orly Taitz's website
and please make a
contribution to Orly's legal efforts against Obama as soon as you can,
even if only 10 or 25 or 50 dollars (more if you are able), and as soon as possible. She has a donation link option at the top of her web-page.
Thank you kindly. |
No comments:
Post a Comment