Welcome! Jesus Christ is my LORD and Savior! Romans 10:9-10,13; John 3:16

[For EU visitors, I do not personally use cookies, but Google or any clickable link (if you choose to click on it) might. This is in compliance with mandatory EU notification]

I am a Natural Born United States Citizen with NO allegiance or citizenship to any nation but my own, and will use this site as a hobby place of sorts to present my own political and religious viewpoints, as a genuine Constitutional Conservative and a genuine Christian Conservative.

Thank you for coming.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Year of our LORD Jesus Christ
2017
-- As of January 20, 2017
A Sigh Of Relief With The Inauguration Of Donald John Trump as President of the United States of America, And Hope For A Prosperous Future For All United States Citizens (we who are a nation called "the melting pot of the world"). We shall be great and exceptionally great again.


Peace and Liberty. Semper Fidelis.









Sunday, May 12, 2013

Remember Ben Ghazi, And That Obama Broke His Promise That "We Leave No One Behind" Just 5 Days After His Pledge At The DNC On September 6, 2012

“From the attack at Fort Hood, to the tragedy at Ben Ghazi, the Boston bombings are our most recent reminder that we must call terrorism what it is, in order to confront it,”

"...the radical jihad movement is alive and well around the world and in the homeland."

 “Equally concerning is the emerging narrative which downplays the spread of the global jihadist movement.”

“You cannot defeat an enemy you refuse to acknowledge.”

 --  House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Rep. Michael McCaul (R-Texas)





Only 5 Days For Obama To Break His DNC Pledge To "Leave No One Behind" and Leave Americans Behind At Ben Ghazi, Libya
   


It took Barack Hussein Obama II only a lousy 5 days, 
5 DAYS!!!,  
 to break a major campaign pledge made at his Democratic National Convention acceptance speech on September 6, 2012, in which he pledged to "leave no one behind."



And I think about the young sailor I met at Walter Reed hospital, still recovering from a grenade attack that would cause him to have his leg amputated above the knee. Six months ago, I would watch him walk into a White House dinner honoring those who served in Iraq, tall and twenty pounds heavier, dashing in his uniform, with a big grin on his face; sturdy on his new leg. And I remember how a few months after that I would watch him on a bicycle, racing with his fellow wounded warriors on a sparkling spring day, inspiring other heroes who had just begun the hard path he had traveled. 

He gives me hope.

I don't know what party these men and women belong to. I don't know if they'll vote for me. But I know that their spirit defines us. 

...

America, I never said this journey would be easy, and I won't promise that now. Yes, our path is harder – but it leads to a better place. Yes our road is longer – but we travel it together. We don't turn back.   We leave no one behind. We pull each other up. We draw strength from our victories, and we learn from our mistakes, but we keep our eyes fixed on that distant horizon, knowing that Providence is with us, and that we are surely blessed to be citizens of the greatest nation on Earth.

Thank you, God bless you, and may God bless these United States.





Before there was talk of a VIDEO as blame for the protest in Cairo of Egypt, and later Ben Ghazi of Libya, 
that was continually bull-sh*tted upon America and the world from Susan Rice's 5 Sunday  talk show appearances to the above video to the Islamists in Pakistan at a cost of $70,000, to Obama's 6 references at the United Nations blaming a mythical video as a catalyst or cause to the violence at Ben Ghazi,  the intent of the Muslims in Cairo of Egypt  to NOT blame a video is evidenced in that in regards to the Cairo Embassy that first issued the video lie, there was NO talk of a video by the Muslims who were planning on protesting.   
September 10, 2012  - 4:20 p.m.
  By  Raymond Ibrahim
"Jihadi groups in Egypt, including Islamic Jihad, the Sunni Group, and Al Gamaa Al Islamiyya have issued a statement threatening to burn the U.S. Embassy in Cairo to the ground.
According to El Fagr, they are calling for the immediate release of the Islamic jihadis who are imprisonment and in detention centers in the U.S. including Guantanamo Bay: “The group, which consists of many members from al-Qaeda, called [especially] for the quick release of the jihadi [mujahid] sheikh, Omar Abdul Rahman [the "Blind Sheikh"], whom they described as a scholar and jihadi who sacrificed his life for the Egyptian Umma, who was ignored by the Mubarak regime, and [President] Morsi is refusing to intervene on his behalf and release him, despite promising that he would.
 The Islamic Group has threatened to burn the U.S. Embassy in Cairo with those in it, and taking hostage those who remain [alive], unless the Blind Sheikh is immediately released.”
The alleged and now known to be mythical offense to the 14 minute anti-Muslim video that was a false flag red herring, was supposed to have been offended the most in Egypt and in Libya.   So why air the APOLOGY video response to that alleged video primarily to the Muslims in Pakistan?  Is that where Obama thought that the Jihadis who attacked Ben Ghazi received their orders from?  What was the reasoning behind focusing the commercials over the television air-waves specifically in Pakistan, and not in Egypt or Libya?  Or as the Intelligence Analysts would say as they would do a double or even a triple-take upon hearing the above back in September 2012 with a, "What the f***?"  Again, the actions and accusations regarding the alleged video were in Egypt and Libya, yet the density of the commercials released regarding the alleged video were specifically focused on the other side of the Middle East in Pakistan?  
Media Nepotism Factors In The Ben Ghazi Cover-up?
Newsbusters has shown that Obama’s Advisory Panel (such as dealing with Ben Ghazi) include those who are siblings directly related to "CBS News President David Rhodes and ABC News President Ben Sherwood," and that "CNN deputy bureau chief, Virginia Moseley, is married to Hillary Clinton’s deputy, Tom Nides."
 This was also confirmed and elaborated upon over at the Examiner.com.  

Relatives of top CBS, ABC and CNN executives helping Obama on Benghazi!
You knew the mainstream media was biased, but this is incredible. It was revealed today that CBS News President David Rhodes' brother is Obama Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes, who was instrumental in rewriting the Benghazi talking points. But it gets worse. It is now learned that ABC President Ben Sherwood's sister, Dr. Elizabeth Sherwood-Randall, is a Special Assistant to Barack Obama on national security affairs. But even this isn't it! CNN's deputy bureau chief, Virginia Moseley, is the wife of Tom Nides, who until February was Hillary Clinton's deputy.
Ben Rhodes is a top NSC advisor with absolutely no foreign policy or military experience. None! This idiot has advocated intervention both in Libya and now Syria. How has that worked out for us? He is responsible for helping to massage the Benghazi talking points to watered down drivel. His greatest accomplishment appears to be a Master's Degree in fiction writing received from New York University. So perhaps we should call him Obama's fiction writer!
In what may be a belated effort to salvage its reputation, or perhaps an effort to get the best scoop now that keeping quiet is out of the question, ABC published a story revealing that there were twelve revisions of the Benghazi memo. The final version eradicated all references to terrorists and al Qaeda. Nice work, Mr. Fiction Writer!
….
So the question is, do the Boards of the Corporate Media at CNN, ABC and CBS share in a conspiracy to cover up and suppress, including creating for itself civil liabilities in knowingly attempting to Obstruct Justice and maliciously discredit Ben Ghazi witnesses and afflict their families with emotional and psychological damage in order to cover up for political nepotism?   Will there be a legal out of court financial settlement offered the victims of Ben Ghazi and that of the families of the fallen in order to sweep the legal and FACTUAL appearance of a Conspiracy under the rug, as it were?    And if CNN, ABC, and CBS are complicit in the Ben Ghazi issue, where they actively suppressed and created unnecessary psychological and emotional trauma upon the families of Ben Ghazi, who is to say they were not complicit in being partisan propagandists pushing for Obama's election?  I personally think that the CNN, ABC, and CBS should be sued in a class action lawsuit, and the respective names of "CBS News President David Rhodes and ABC News President Ben Sherwood," and that "CNN deputy bureau chief, Virginia Moseley" need to be specifically named as defendants in such a Civil lawsuit.
If the Corporate Media wishes to circle the wagons around Obama, then we need to start taking out the wagons and create a metaphorical breech, and utilize that to enable Obama's Impeachment over Ben Ghazi, with conspiracy to commit second-degree murder through the intentional act of  dereliction of duty through his "stand-down" orders to refuse military help and to intentionally leave a legal ambassador of the United States and other United States Citizens in distress who gave the legal S.O.S. call sign behind (though he should most certainly and specifically be Criminally Charged as a Foreign Usurper of the Presidency with thousands of felonious counts that he can never legally escape in a legal process because he was and is NOT a United States Natural Born Citizen as required by the United States Constitution.)  
John Kerry Effectually Promises a Department of State Stonewalling of Congress in Diplomatic Language To This Effect
On Thursday, May 09, 2013, while in a Press Conference in Rome, 
putative Secretary of State John Kerry stated that he intends to put the issue of Ben Ghazi to bed, and he expects to do it through whatever spin his chief of staff David Wade can do to give as many non-answer answers to any questions Congress may have.  In effect, Kerry openly boasted of what is tantamount to a pledge to stonewall Congress over the issue of the Ben Ghazi  September 11, - 12, 2012 multiple terror attacks.
Kerry stated, where it regards discipline or corrective action, “any recent evidence will [ONLY] be a component of that consideration.”  In other words, even if there is enough to convict with a slam-dunk in Court, Kerry will only assign it MINIMAL value.
“I’ve already made it crystal clear to the chairmen of the relevant [congressional] committees that I have assigned my chief of staff, David Wade, to be responsible for liaisoning with them to answer any questions that they have.”

“I am absolutely determined that this issue will be answered, will be put to bed….”
No kidding.    


[[[[[ Update: May 15, 2013  These e-mails were just released by the White House today in order to stave off the comparisons to the Nixon Watergate tapes scandal.  Unlike Obama, Watergate resulted in NO DEATHS or NO MAIMINGS and NO INJURIES to any Americans.  Ben Ghazi is far worse.  But it is what it is.  Still, even though the e-mail disclosure runs about 100 pages, there are yet hundreds more redacted or kept back.   



 

 



Meanwhile, "The Hill" has obtained an Internal Revenue Watchdog report
 http://thehill.com/images/stories/news/2013/05_may/14/fr-revised-redacted-1.pdf
relating to the IRS Scandal where Obama zealots persecuted Conservatives and Constitutionalists as part of Obama's abuse of power in the Executive Branch over the Treasury.  It is likely that Obama was advised and assented to the continued persecutions in May 2012 when the
acting IRS Commissioner Steve Miller, 


  then Deputy Commisioner of the IRS,  who reports to the head of Treasury, who in turn reports directly to Obama, was informed of the political situation 


and likely the head of Treasury in turn sought advice of White House counsel.  As former Chief Counsel himself, the persecutions of Conservatives  give the appearance and are at the necessary level of approval needed

 http://www.video.theblaze.com/media/video.jsp?content_id=27087529&topic_id=24584158&tcid=vpp_copy_27087529&v=3
 



to inform us that most likely they were Steve Miller's "baby" or "pet project" for Obama, or that he gave his specific personal approval of the activity, it seems to me,  which assured his promotion.

But as with Obama, no matter how loyal you are, if you get caught, you are discarded as if you were Nancy Pelosi's astro-turf.   Steven Miller today wrote his staff at the IRS he was resigning, and later in the day, Obama delivered an evening statement claiming he was firing Miller.
 http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2325223/Obama-fires-acting-IRS-commissioner-pressure-grows-surrounding-political-targeting-conservative-groups-sought-tax-exempt-status.html


And in the world of crass entertainment, even Jon Stewart is finding the Obama Scandals a bit much.


  John Stewart makes a point about Obama's lame excuses regarding recent scandals are such, that Obama acts as if he was not informed about the IRS (or other) scandal, until he watched himself on television talking about it.

End of Update - May 15 2013]]]]]

No comments:

Post a Comment