Welcome! Jesus Christ is my LORD and Savior! Romans 10:9-10,13; John 3:16

[For EU visitors, I do not personally use cookies, but Google or any clickable link (if you choose to click on it) might. This is in compliance with mandatory EU notification]

I am a Natural Born United States Citizen with NO allegiance or citizenship to any nation but my own, and will use this site as a hobby place of sorts to present my own political and religious viewpoints, as a genuine Constitutional Conservative and a genuine Christian Conservative.

Thank you for coming.
In the Year of our LORD Jesus Christ
-- As of January 20, 2017
A Sigh Of Relief With The Inauguration Of Donald John Trump as President of the United States of America, And Hope For A Prosperous Future For All United States Citizens (we who are a nation called "the melting pot of the world"). We shall be great and exceptionally great again.

It is likely that the entries to this blog will be less frequent than in years past. I do intend to keep this blog active, and to offer insightful information and/or opinion (and sometimes humor and/or entertainment on occasion) when I do post.

Peace and Liberty. Semper Fidelis.

Monday, May 7, 2018

A Missing Social Media Tech Company Scandal

 If there is one Law Review article that should be nationally talk radio read and discussed in April 2018, it should have been:

Kate Klonick p.1599
Volume 131 · April 2018 · Number 6

It was released with ample time for Congress to read it prior to dog and pony show questioning CEO Mark Zuckerberg about Facebook online practices. 
Zuckerberg tried to put one focus on pre-censorship artificial intelligence.  The inference regards a situation where as one types anything, the Artificial Intelligence program that Facebook pre-programs  as containing hate speech into its software, even as the person is typing, that typing is deleted and the user is cyber-blocked (or perhaps we should envision cyber attacked, and their computer or phone or internet access destroyed?).  Zuckerberg envisions 5 - 10 years for such an Internet artificial intelligence takeover where only a select few elites have control and bypass keys.  But what if any such system becomes self-aware, as DARPA is trying to develop and employ it as?  Two movies that explored a general concept of that, Wargames in the 1980s and Terminator, come to mind for general discussion with those who are intimidated about discussing an article from a Law Review or general themes and practices by those heading large communications related companies. 

 In regard to Congress questioning Zuckerberg, the primary practice of Facebook outsourcing moderators who have no interest or care about our First Amendment and/or the US Constitution was left alone.  Congress obviously doesn't read the Law Reviews, let alone most of the bills they vote on.  But unfortunately, those of us who READ end up being the media manufactured threats.  Never mind a general public that increasingly has a lower and lower ability to read, with an above the 4th grade illiteracy rate, not to mention being workplace innumerate and asking, "A third of a pound, how much is that?  A quarter?  That's 73 or something on the scale, isn't it?"  Yes, friends, the public teachers of this nation congratulate themselves for pushing such morons as GRADUATES into US society...and this is probably about 40% bare minimum of those in the U.S. Public School System.   Now take such a moron, with perhaps a third grade English literacy, if we are lucky, and give him or her a corporate excuse to hate America and Americans and our "free speech" and our Constitution, and give these foreign dumb-asses a set of rules that for them is the supreme law for keeping their job,  and more money (even though far less than would be paid in the USA) in their  foreign country than 80% of his or her struggling  peers, and what do you get?  One correct answer would inevitably include or be: A Facebook moderator.  

  Facebook moderators are first and foremost FOREIGNERS who don't care or in any way intuitively grasp the Constitution of the United States First Amendment.

 Facebook as of 2016 outsourced virtually all moderation (except the last level upper Corporate decisions) outside that of these United States.

 The Harvard Law Review never up dated that likely we should include CHINA as an additional call center, or perhaps it is that they are not directly over the USA in moderation as those of Ireland wanting EU totalitarianism and India's Big Brother have a number or you don't exist to buy or sell or own anything system with its caste levels of slugs and slaves to half human to whole humans view of humanity (very often most opposite of the Declaration of Independence and Constitution's language) has.

Facebook moderators are First and foremost those "we don’t care about US Constitution" FOREIGN call centers in the Philippines, Ireland, Mexico, Turkey, India, or Eastern Europe. 

 Their immediate supervisors are in where Obama was college initiated into his Shia Islam as a young man in a CIA outpost of Hyderabad, India, as well as a George Soros and EU Governance Connection and CIA outpost hub in Dublin, Ireland.  

Main Corporate Facebook Supervisor and Tier 3 Attorneys are over the India and Ireland based supervisors, and are based in Austin Texas as well as in the San Francisco Bay Area of California. 

Check out pages 1634 and 1640-1641 of this hyperlinked April 2018 Harvard Law Review especially. 

While operating in the USA, Facebook needs to abide by the US Constitution and Civil Rights anti-discrimination laws that protect religious beliefs as well as race from persecution. 

They need to suspend outsourcing moderation to FOREIGNERS and hire USA born moderators who live and work HERE in the United States at all 3 tier levels, and the same needs to be said of Google and Youtube. FIRE the foreign born visa and other non-citizens from the entire 3 tier moderation process for all USA accounts. 

Let's look at the referred to points at the Harvard Law Review to which I refer:
{Quote} Exactly “who” was moderating the content changed significantly in

January 2009, when Facebook opened its office in Dublin and first

started outsourcing its content moderation through consulting groups.

Before then, most moderators worked in Palo Alto and were similar to

Facebook’s main user base — “homogenous college students.” 250 The

shift to outsourced moderation continued when a new community

operations team was set up in Hyderabad, India. 251 {Unquote} p. 1634
[250 and 251 footnote refer to:] Telephone Interview with Dave Willner, Former Head of Content Policy, Facebook & Charlotte Willner, Former Safety Manager, User Operations, Facebook (Mar. 23, 2016).

{Quote} In the early days, recent college graduates based in the San Francisco

Bay Area did much of the Tier 3 content moderation. 290 Today, most platforms,

including Facebook, either directly employ content-moderation

teams or outsource much of their content-moderation work to companies

like oDesk (now Upwork), Sutherland, and Deloitte. 291 

In 2009, Facebook opened an office in Dublin, Ireland, that had twenty dedicated support and user-operations staff. 292 In 2010, working with an outsourcing partner, Facebook opened a new office in Hyderabad, India, for user support. 293

Today, Tier 3 moderators typically work in “call centers” 294 in the

Philippines, Ireland, Mexico, Turkey, India, or Eastern Europe. 295

Within Facebook, these workers are called “community support” or

“user support teams.” 296

Tier 2 moderators are typically supervisors of Tier 3 moderators or

specialized moderators with experience judging content. They work

both remotely (many live in the United States and supervise groups that

290 Telephone Interview with Dave Willner & Charlotte Willner, supra note 147; Telephone Interview with Sasha Rosse, Manager of Glob. Outsourcing, Facebook (May 16, 2016); Buni & Chemaly, supra note 12.

291 Telephone Interview with Sasha Rosse, supra note 290; Adrian Chen, Inside Facebook’s Outsourced Anti-Porn and Gore Brigade, Where “Camel Toes” Are More Offensive than “Crushed Heads,”

GAW K E R (Feb. 16, 2012, 3:45 PM), http://gawker.com/5885714/i...

[https://perma.cc/HU7H-972C]; Chen, supra note 12.

292 Telephone Interview with Sasha Rosse, supra note 290.

293 Id.

294 Buni & Chemaly, supra note 12.

295 Content Moderator Interviews, supra note 288; Telephone Interview with Sasha Rosse, supra note 290; Chen, supra note 291; Chen, supra note 12.

296 Telephone Interview with Dave Willner & Charlotte Willner, supra note 147; Telephone Interview with Jud Hoffman, supra note 148.
p. 1641
are internationally based) and locally at call centers. 299   Tier 2 moderators

review content that has been prioritized, like imminent threats of

violence, self-harm, terrorism, or suicide. This content comes to Tier 2

directly through the reporting flow or by being identified and escalated

to Tier 2 by Tier 3 moderators. Tier 2 moderators also review certain

randomized samples of Tier 3 moderation decisions.

...Tier 1 moderation is predominantly performed at the legal or policy

headquarters of a platform. At Facebook, for example, a Tier 3 worker

could be based in Hyderabad, a Tier 2 supervisor could be based in

Hyderabad, or remotely in a place like Dublin, but a Tier 1 contact

would be based in Austin, Texas, or the San Francisco Bay Area.

299 Id.; Telephone Interview with Dave Willner & Charlotte Willner, supra note 147. {Unquote}

 Foreign outsourcing of moderation and full information data mining access to foreign governments, that of the Philippines, Ireland, Mexico, Turkey, India, or Eastern Europe, is unacceptable. The PUBLIC needs to know. 

FACEBOOK (by its own high level ex-employees whose job it was to know, tells us that Facebook)  OUTSOURCES ALL YOUR DATA TO FOREIGN HANDS AND EFFECTUALLY SAYS,

And perhaps they might say, "Well Apple gave over all its encryption keys, so that every user of Apple products, including Android smartphone users, have all that data as accessible to the Government of China, as it is already backdoor accessible to the United States National Security Agency." 

And the answer would be, if a Chinese businessman openly gave the NSA every smartphone and most computer users in China, especially those in the Government of China for espionage purposes to the United States spy agencies, what should China do to that traitor?

  So when early 2018 Apple does to the United States the same thing, and Zuckerberg tops it off with his own Facebook data mines on hundreds of millions of present and past Facebook users  worldwide, but especially data mine access dumps that for a 0% business tax rate to operate in China that China now gives in reciprocation for the Communist State of China's Intel a full access of the many tens of millions in the USA, are those chief executives at Apple 

Apple Officially Announces Their Merger With The Chinese Government

February 26, 2018

Alex Jones reveals how Apple has officially announced their plans to merge their customers' data and their massive corporation with the authoritarian, communist, Chinese Government. 

or Zuckerberg at Facebook any less a criminal at large (as yet uncharged and unprosecuted)?  

We have two major espionage scandals that need to be Department of Justice prosecuted right now:
1) Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, Robert Mueller and others on profiteering and espionage crimes in regard of what they gave to Russia and what they personally received; and
2) The Apple and Facebook espionage data to anyone the National Government of China wants any time and however often or as much as it wants, on every USA citizen in present and past accounts access, which they of Apple and Facebook willingly gave to China for a 0% operating in China business tax break and to profiteer from China's widespread slave labor wages.

 These two great espionage scandals of the near past and present need prosecution NOW,  but due to near total Washington D.C. federal corruption and federal blackmail vulnerabilities by those in the highest executive positions in various respective departments and in Congress, they won't likely ever be prosecuted short of a national crisis triggering such an outcry as that of
 (and I am using a hypothetical here) 
against a nuclear flattening of a small American city, it seems to me. 

No comments:

Post a Comment