10 U.S. Code § 252 - Use of militia and armed forces to enforce Federal authority
Whenever the President considers that unlawful obstructions, combinations, or assemblages, or rebellion against the authority of the United States, make it impracticable to enforce the laws of the United States in any State by the ordinary course of judicial proceedings, he may call into Federal service such of the militia of any State, and use such of the armed forces, as he considers necessary to enforce those laws or to suppress the rebellion.
(Aug. 10, 1956, ch. 1041, 70A Stat. 15, § 332; Pub. L. 109–163, div. A, title X, § 1057(a)(2), Jan. 6, 2006, 119 Stat. 3440; renumbered § 252, Pub. L. 114–328, div. A, title XII, § 1241(a)(2), Dec. 23, 2016, 130 Stat. 2497.)
Nishimura Ekiu v. United States,
142 U.S. 651 (1892) @ 659
"…It is an accepted maxim of international law that every sovereign nation has the power, as inherent in
sovereignty and essential to self-preservation, to forbid the entrance of foreigners within its dominions..."
The Chinese Exclusion Case, 130 U.S. 581 (1889) @ 607,609
"In a communication in September, 1869, to Mr. Washburne, our minister to France, Mr. Fish, Secretary of State under President Grant, uses this language:
"The control of the people within its limits, and the right to expel from its territory persons who are dangerous to the peace of the state, are too clearly within the essential attributes of sovereignty to be seriously contested. Strangers visiting or sojourning in a foreign country voluntarily submit themselves to its laws and customs, and the municipal laws of France, authorizing the expulsion of strangers, are not of such recent date, nor has the exercise of the power by the government of France been so infrequent, that sojourners within her territory can claim surprise when the power is put in force."
The power of exclusion of foreigners being an incident of sovereignty belonging to the government of the United States as a part of those sovereign powers delegated by the Constitution, the right to its exercise at any time when, in the judgment of the government, the interests of the country require it, cannot be granted away or restrained on behalf of anyone.
The powers of government are delegated in trust to the United States, and are incapable of transfer to any other parties. They cannot be abandoned or surrendered.
Nor can their exercise be hampered,
when needed for the public good, by any considerations of private interest."
In re Ross, 140 U.S. 453 (1891) @ 464
“By the Constitution, a government is ordained and established "for the United States of America," and not for countries outside of their limits.”
"...The Constitution can have no operation in another country."
Shaughnessy v. United States ex rel. Mezei, 345 U.S. 206 (1953) @ 210
“Courts have long recognized the power to expel or exclude aliens as a fundamental sovereign attribute exercised by the Government’s political departments largely immune from judicial control.”
Then there's also:
“The exclusion of aliens is a fundamental act of sovereignty.” United States ex rel. Knauff v. Shaughnessy, 338 U.S. 537(1950)@ 542; see also Landon v. Plasencia, 459 U.S. 21 (1982) @ 32. The “power of exclusion of aliens is also inherent in the executive.” Knauff, 338 U.S. 543
The United States Constitution states in Article 4, Section 4 that:
"The United States shall guarantee to every
State in this Union a Republican Form of
Government, and shall protect each of them
and Article 6, Clause 2 of the Constitution of the United States clearly states that
"THIS CONSTITUTION *** SHALL BE THE SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND;
and the Judges in every State
shall be bound thereby,
any Thing in the Constitution."
Even as the judiciary cannot rule that States have no right to a Republican Form of Government as stated by the Constitution, so too do judges who act beyond their Constitutional authority have no Constitutional authority to prohibit a clear mandate exclusive to the President to prohibit invasion of the States (or to in any way impose restrictions) to those aliens, which is reaffirmed in United States Federal Law by statute:
"8 U.S. Code § 1182 - Inadmissible aliens
(f) SUSPENSION OF ENTRY OR IMPOSITION OF RESTRICTIONS BY PRESIDENT
Whenever the President finds that the entry of any aliens or of any class of aliens into the United States would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, he may by proclamation *** impose on the entry of aliens any restrictions he may deem to be appropriate...."
Clearly, President Trump is not dealing with an unconstitutional statute, and is affirming what the Constitution requires of him, that he NOT be derelict in his duties to protect, preserve / enforce, defend the Constitution and the provisions and language thereof, et cetera.
The United States Constitution in Article 2, Section 1, Clause 8 states:
"Before he enter on the Execution of his Office, he shall take the following Oath or Affirmation:—“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”
SUPPORT THE CONSTITUTION and the President of the United States in correctly acting to preserve and protect and defend the Constitution's mandate to protect us from Invasion (Article 4. Section 4.). Whether or not you like this President, SUPPORT the President for PROPERLY following the Constitution and protecting us all on this one, and ask that whatever number of U.S. military troops he sends to the border, to double or triple that and make sure that they are armed with the ammo and resources they need, and at the ready until the day the entire wall is completed.