The National Security Adviser is considered a senior aide
directly employed by and in the Executive Office of the President. They are situated with an office in the West
Wing of the White House and given meetings on the National Security Council as
well as working closely with the Secretary of Defense and the Secretary of
State. It is often essential that they
be on hand and available to serve in the Presidential Emergency Operations
Center or in the White House Situation Room when any crisis develops. The role was created in 1953 under President
Eisenhower, and the general staff under the senior management is considered
Deep State career personnel, who usually remain regardless of what new
politically appointed National Security Adviser and his or her immediate senior
personnel in direct support of the National Security Adviser are brought
in.
The National Security Council was itself created through the
passing of the National Security Act of 1947 which sought a reorganization of
National Defense into the Department of Defense, a reorganization Foreign
Intelligence, and various related services and policies which included the
creation of the Central Intelligence Agency and the National Security Council. In
1949, the National Security Council became part of the Executive Office of The President
of the United States, although it would be 4 more years before the role of the
National Security Adviser (who reported directly to and on behalf of the
President in select security issues representation) was created.
In regard to the release of Top Secret electronic surveillance intercepts of incoming National Security Adviser Mike Flynn and his setting up a future meeting between incoming President Trump and the Russian ambassador at some future date (among many other ambassadors for the same opportunity also), it is now revealed that an employee of the Executive Office of the President, acting directly with and in behalf of the Presidency, despite previous denials,
National Security Adviser Susan Rice, was the leaker of General Flynn's December 2016 conversation.
"Intelligence sources said the logs discovered by National Security Council staff suggested Rice’s interest in the NSA materials, some of which included unmasked Americans' identities, appeared to begin last July around the time Trump secured the GOP nomination and accelerated after Trump’s election in November launched a transition that continued through January."
See also:
To recap:
In regard to the release of Top Secret electronic surveillance intercepts of incoming National Security Adviser Mike Flynn and his setting up a future meeting between incoming President Trump and the Russian ambassador at some future date (among many other ambassadors for the same opportunity also), it is now revealed that an employee of the Executive Office of the President, acting directly with and in behalf of the Presidency, despite previous denials,
National Security Adviser Susan Rice, was the leaker of General Flynn's December 2016 conversation.
"Intelligence sources said the logs discovered by National Security Council staff suggested Rice’s interest in the NSA materials, some of which included unmasked Americans' identities, appeared to begin last July around the time Trump secured the GOP nomination and accelerated after Trump’s election in November launched a transition that continued through January."
See also:
In an after the criminal acts were already done second set of
criminal fingerprints openly left by Obama, apparently the White House authorized
to be leaked a declassified version of
what Obama’s NSA spy data collection sharing with other Intelligence Agencies
in Obama’s Executive Order 12333 rendition really meant in cross sharing data
AFTER they had feloniously already done so and had already shared in regard to
Donald Trump and others since the May 6, 2016 executive order regarding the use
of a White House Transition Coordination Council the authorization to engage
and spy on then Candidate Trump and any
advancement he might make going forward, so as to now exonerate themselves in
regard to NOT finding anything on Trump.
See also:
In January 2017, Jane Chong over at Lawfare reported:
"Obama Administration Releases Long Awaited New E.O.
12333 Rules on Sharing of Raw Signals Intelligence Information Within IC
By Jane Chong
Thursday, January 12, 2017, 12:38 PM
The New York Times reported this morning that the
Obama administration has put into place new rules allowing the NSA to
disseminate “raw signals intelligence information.”
According to
a 23-page, mostly declassified copy of the procedures, released today, Director
of National Intelligence James Clapper signed the rules on Dec. 15 and Attorney
General Loretta Lynch signed them on Jan. 3.
... On
February 25, 2016, Charlie Savage reported for the Times that the Obama
administration would soon be implementing a new system, years in the making, to
provide more intelligence agencies across the federal government direct access
to raw information collected by the NSA.
Recall that Executive Order 12333 permits
dissemination of signals intelligence data only in accordance with procedures
established by the DNI in coordination with the Defense Secretary and approved
by the Attorney General. "
To recap:
In United States v. Butenko, 494 F.2d 593,(3d Cir. 1974), an
oft “go to” citation case used by the Federal Government for warrants for
gathering Intelligence, even upon those who are United States Citizens within
the United States and specified as “exceptions” to legally be spied upon, you
will find in end note 6 that a President of the United States may himself
authorize those measures –
“he deems necessary to protect the Nation against actual or
potential attack or other hostile acts of a foreign power, to obtain foreign
intelligence information deemed essential to the security of the United States,
or to protect national security information against foreign intelligence
activities.”
In effect, the Presidential authorization of the wiretap or
electronic surveillance by its very nature of Executive Privilege, seals any
disclosure except as necessary and likely then only in camera (in judge’s
chambers) with approved or cleared to receive counsel, under gag to not reveal
the same.
In Federal Law, the primary U.S. Code that we would be dealing
with in a better understanding of what is involved in a domestic surveillance
situation of foreign intelligence claims on a U.S. Citizen on U.S. soil by
electronic surveillance with NO CRIMINAL COMPLAINT are generally the ff. (and
their stated in their code, references):
50 U.S. Code § 1801 - Definitions
50 U.S. Code § 1804 - Applications for court orders
50 U.S. Code § 1823 - Application for order
50 U.S. Code § 1861 - Access to certain business records for
foreign intelligence and international terrorism investigations
50 U.S. Code § 1881b - Certain acquisitions inside the United
States targeting United States persons outside the United States
Whatever the application was and whatever the details of proof
was, this would have to be written down in the original July 2016 application
for a FISA electronic surveillance warrant.
The application to surveil Presidential Candidate Trump in July and October of 2016, would have had to declare one of two things:
(1) that Candidate Trump was a foreign power (which we can dismiss as not applicable); or
2) the claim
[by DNI James Clapper and / or Obama ]
that Candidate Trump was alleged to be an "agent of a foreign power."
50 U.S.C. §§ 1804(a)(3), (a)(4)(A);
50 U.S.C. §§ 1823(a)(3), (a)(4)(A).
Under 50 U.S. Code § 1823 - Application for order, we find that a petition regarding the surveillance of Presidential Candidate Donald Trump, if not a direct order out of the office of the POTUS, would emanate ONLY from 5 Executive Agencies as possible sources of petition to surveil:
“the Director of the Federal Bureau of Investigation,
the Secretary of Defense,
the Secretary of State,
the Director of National Intelligence,
or the Director of the Central Intelligence Agency.”
Returning To Rice, Who At Minimum Is Guilty Of A Felony:
Returning To Rice, Who At Minimum Is Guilty Of A Felony:
In all the months of surveillance, from May 2016 to whenever it stopped, if it ever did, the hostile to Trump Intelligence personnel and those they gave information to of like mindedness had NOTHING that remotely could be leaked to the public as the transcript of Michael Flynn's National Security Adviser In Transition empowered conversation was.
Apparently, as we see it being reported above, it was a National Security Adviser to Obama, Susan Rice, who was DIRECTLY REPRESENTING OBAMA as part of the Executive Office of the POTUS, who served in that capacity from July 1, 2013 – January 20, 2017 who leaked the information on former General Mike Flynn, the incoming National Security Adviser successor: the man she hated with a vengeance.
It was a special hatred by Susan Rice who had a corrupt financial loss motive against Flynn, just as much as it was partisan politics. To her, it was about all the financial loss or payback for all the millions of dollars in graft she would have gotten (just use Hillary's success with the Clinton Foundation as Secretary of State as an example, over $102 million from Russia alone). Susan Rice, as the Ambassador to the UN, (she was there January 26, 2009 – June 30, 2013), Rice was sabotaged by Flynn from profiteering by a pro-Isis / pro-Al Qaeda war in Syria to use U.S. Forces to overthrow Syria for an enemy we are legally at war with (which is defined as TREASON in the Constitution and U.S. Code).
And so, the new Watergate begins, and hopefully, America will quickly realize that the actual pro-active sabotage from the illegal surveillance activities began with Obama's own May 6, 2016 Executive Order. Be sure to read parts 1,2,3 of this series:
Part 1:
Part 2:
Part 3:
In all this, regardless of how deeply I am vindicated
--in this series of posts that correctly start by pointing out Obama's May 6, 2016 Executive Order and walking it forward on the Federal Law and an analysis anyone should be able to grasp if they have an triple digit intellect and cognitive ability to look at the data without bias --
I can only ask that we put not our faith in politics and the world system, but in GOD our Creator, who created the Heavens and the Earth, and through Jesus Christ alone, who through our faith into Him and through Him the Father also, manifests a personal eternal salvation of the soul and a relationship in that manner for those who will believe into Jesus that we might avoid manifestations of the wrath of GOD in the souls of our personal lives (John 3:36).
--in this series of posts that correctly start by pointing out Obama's May 6, 2016 Executive Order and walking it forward on the Federal Law and an analysis anyone should be able to grasp if they have an triple digit intellect and cognitive ability to look at the data without bias --
I can only ask that we put not our faith in politics and the world system, but in GOD our Creator, who created the Heavens and the Earth, and through Jesus Christ alone, who through our faith into Him and through Him the Father also, manifests a personal eternal salvation of the soul and a relationship in that manner for those who will believe into Jesus that we might avoid manifestations of the wrath of GOD in the souls of our personal lives (John 3:36).
No comments:
Post a Comment