Hat Tip and many thanks to http://www.birtherreport.com/
In regard to Ted Cruz's ineligibility to run for or be President of the United States {P.O.T.U.S.}, let alone be a Vice-President, we have Maine's current Governor
LePage's daughters by example.
The relevant Canadian Citizenship Laws of Canada are summed up
by Canada as:
"History of citizenship legislation
This section contains policy, procedures and guidance used by
IRCC staff. It is posted on the IRCC website as a courtesy to stakeholders.
The requirements for citizenship under each of these acts
vary. It is important to understand the way in which each of these is
interpreted, because the provisions of these acts determine a person’s
entitlement to citizenship.
Naturalization Act (British subject) [May 22, 1868, to
December 31, 1946]
Before January 1, 1947, a person born or naturalized in Canada
was considered a British subject. The terms “Canadian citizen” and “Canadian
citizenship” used in some statutes before that date did not create the legal
status of Canadian citizen.
Canadian Citizenship Act [January 1, 1947]
Up to January 1, 1947, there was no legal status of Canadian
citizens, only British subjects. This Act gave legal recognition to the terms
“Canadian citizen” and “Canadian citizenship”. The Act established who was and
who could become a Canadian citizen. There were many provisions for loss of
citizenship, including retention provisions for the first and subsequent
generations born outside Canada. The Act also contained provisions which
provided special treatment for British subjects. In general, Canadian citizens
who acquired citizenship of another country automatically lost Canadian
citizenship (dual citizenship was not recognized).
Citizenship Act [February 15, 1977]
The Citizenship Act, effective February 15, 1977, replaced the
1947 Act with a more equitable statute. For example, British subjects no longer
received special treatment and dual citizenship became recognized. There was
only one provision for automatic loss of citizenship, limited to persons born
in the second or subsequent generation outside Canada unless they took steps to
retain their citizenship by their 28th birthday."
That
means Ted Cruz's own kids, though born in the United States are recognized by
Canada as birth citizens of Canada until their 28th birthday. Since they are Birth Citizens by derivative citizenship from R. Ed Cruz, they can at anytime move to Canada before their 28th birthday, as Canadian Citizens, and at age 21 on their own they can register and live and work and vote as Canadians the rest of their lives as if they never had any United States Birth Citizenship issues. How the hell does this make R.Ed Cruz's kids or himself a UNITED STATES Natural Born Citizen? It is proof that he is a FRAUD, a LIAR, a Globalist CON-ARTIST merely currently employed in the United States Senate.
I put together a transcript of the above Birther Report
article video from about the 10 second to 47 second mark. It may need to be
tweaked a little.
[at 10 seconds]
Howie Carr: "...and as you know, Senator Ted Cruz is coming
in on, uh, on Friday, and I sure he [inaudible] say unto himself: 'Why didn't
LePage endorse me? He's the most conservative governor there is!' And uh."
Governor LePage: "Very simple. Very simple. I am the most
conservative governor, [pause] that there is. The first [inaudible] senator, is
not ready. Number one. Number two, is I also have two daughters that born in
Canada, and they had to be naturalized, they couldn't be natural.
And so, I have a question here.
Howie Carr: Really? You don't think your daughters could run
for President?
Governor LePage: "They can't! I KNOW they can't. I've
already looked into it.
Howie Carr: Really? I didn't, I didn't ..so how were th-, what
uh years were you in Canada?
Governor LePage: 1972 until 1979.
....
----------------------
Maine's Governor LePage's
two daughters, Lisa and Lindsay, were born in CANADA in 1975 and
1976.
Rafael Edward Cruz,
Jr. was also born as a Canadian Born Ctizen (as his own birth certificate says)
In other words, the significance
of what Governor LePage says, is that his daughters are governed by the same Citizenship laws of Canada as R. Ed / "Ted" is, and both are
naturalized and known to be ineligible.
PUBLIC LAW 414-JUNE 27, 1952,
CHILD BORN OUTSIDE OF UNITED STATES OF ONE ALIEN AND ONE
CITIZEN PARENT AT TIME OF BIRTH; CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH CITIZENSHIP
AUTOMATICALLY ACQUIRED
SEC. 320. (a) A child born outside of the United States, one
of whose parents at the time of the child's birth was an alien and the other of
whose parents then was and never thereafter ceased to be a citizen of the
United States, shall, if such alien parent is naturalized, become a citizen of
the United States, when- (1) such naturalization takes place while such child
is under the age of sixteen years; and (2) such child is residing in the United
States pursuant to a lawful admission for permanent residence at the time of
naturalization or thereafter and begins to reside permanently in the United
States while under the age of sixteen years....
Governor LePage and the mother of Lisa and Lindsay are UNITED STATES CITIZENS at the time of the birth of Lisa and Lindsay in Canada. R. Ed Cruz only had a mother with a claim of U.S. Citizenship.
The same legal requirements that governed these girls governed R.Ed Cruz. The same legal standing, of NOT being United States Natural Born Citizens at birth in Canada, but having to be NATURALIZED, also apply.
The subject to the
jurisdiction of the United States at birth is a requirement specified in
Elk v.
Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94 (1884) @102. , 103
Page 112 U. S. 102
..."Persons not thus [completely] subject to the
jurisdiction of the United States at the time of birth cannot become so
afterwards except by being naturalized, either individually, as by proceedings
under the naturalization acts, or collectively, as by the force of a treaty by
which foreign territory is acquired."
Page 112 U. S. 103
...It is also worthy of remark that the language used about
the same time by the very Congress which framed the Fourteenth Amendment, in
the first section of the Civil Rights Act of April 9, 1866, declaring who shall
be citizens of the United States, is "ALL PERSONS BORN IN THE UNITED
STATES, AND NOT SUBJECT TO ANY FOREIGN POWER, excluding Indians not
taxed." 14 Stat. 27; Rev.Stat. § 1992."
To be born outside the United States made the child a citizen
by naturalization laws and treaties, as following the citizenship of the
Father, but NOT being someone defined as a United States Natural Born Citizen,
but rather a naturalized citizen because these became citizens by operation of
law in the way the court explained here in Elk v. Wilkins. There are claims
that the father of R. Ed Cruz naturalized to Canada in 1968. If that indeed is
the case, since the mother had no State Residence in the United States to lay
claim in giving any children she had a State Citizenship to attach themselves
to, which is a requirement under the legal education opinion of William Rawle
who placed STATE CITIZENSHIP AND LOCATION IN THE UNITED STATES as a legal
necessity to run for POTUS, by what measure or claim does "Ted" have
in any way outside of naturalization? He has NOTHING. .
William Rawle, A View of the Constitution of the United States
(in 1829, as stated in his Second
edition)
states that:
"…Under our Constitution the question is settled by its
express language, and when we are informed that, excepting those who were
citizens, (however the capacity was acquired,) at the time the Constitution was
adopted, no person is eligible to the office of president unless he is a
natural born citizen, the principle that THE PLACE OF BIRTH creates the
relative quality is established as to us.
…No one can suppose that the parent
intended, that WHILE HE WAS A PERMANENT CITIZEN OF THE STATE, his children
should not partake of the same rights, enjoy the same liberty, and be protected
by the same government."
CRUZ IS INELIGIBLE on all counts. Rubio's parents were NOT United States
Citizens with State Citizenship, but aliens, at the time of Rubio's birth,
therefore he too, is illegal to run and be either President (Article 2.1) or Vice-President (12th
Amendment) under the U.S. Constitution.
No comments:
Post a Comment