On April 4, 2023, ex-President Trump was falsely charged with a 34 felony count indictment in a New York City Courtroom. A quick read should have been enough for any real judge to toss the charges as FRIVOLOUS.
Cornell Law School defines this as:
[Quote]
"frivolous
Primary tabs
A frivolous claim, often called a bad faith claim, refers to a lawsuit, motion or appeal that is intended to harass, delay or embarrass the opposition.
A claim is frivolous when the claim lacks any arguable basis either in law or in fact Neitze v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989). That means, in a frivolous claim, either: “(1) "the 'factual contentions are clearly baseless,' such as when allegations are the product of delusion or fantasy;" or (2) "the claim is 'based on an indisputably meritless legal theory.'" Livingston v. Adirondack Beverage Co., 141 F.3d 434, 437 (2d Cir. 1998).
If a court decides a claim is frivolous, the court can dismiss the case, order the
party which files the frivolous claim and the party’s attorney to pay any
reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees incurred as a result of the
frivolous claim. ...
[Last updated in June of 2020 by the Wex Definitions Team]"
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/frivolous
[Unquote]
The claims made by New York City and encouraged by Joe Biden is Article III injury in fact to ex-President Trump,
1) Baker v. Carr 369 U.S. 186 (1962) @ 204, 208
2) United States v. SCRAP 412 U.S. 669 (1973) @ 471-474, 476
3) Whitmore v. Arkansas 495 U.S. 149 (1990) @ 154-155
4) Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife 504 U.S. 555 (1992) @ 560-561, 574-578
5) Northeastern Fla. Chapter, Associated Gen. Contractors of America v. Jacksonville 508 U.S. 656 (1993) @ 663-664
6) Arizonans for Official English v. Arizona 520 U.S. 43 (1997) @ 64
7) Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States ex rel. Stevens 529 U.S. 765 (2000) @ 771-773
and open to major civil actions wins for him personally.
When you read the 34 counts, that begin in FEBRUARY 2017,
https://www.manhattanda.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Donald-J.-Trump-Indictment.pdf
a month AFTER Trump signed away his business control in over 400 companies
https://money.cnn.com/2017/01/23/news/donald-trump-resigns-business/index.html
(the 19 page document being)
https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/3404759/DJT-Resignation-Signature-Page-With-Exhibit-a.pdf
the case is immediately a FRIVOLOUS one. Exclamation that!
The Donald Trump Revocable Trust is on page 19 of the companies Donald trump was cut off from as of January 19, 2017,the Donald Trump Revocable Trust being third from the bottom of that 19 page document of the last hyper-link above, being one of the companies Donald Trump was no longer associated with after January 19, 2017.
Remember that date. January 19, 2017, as you read all 34 counts of the indictment claims of falsifying records well AFTER that date.
The first 4 counts of the PHONY indictments by the Soros funded political opposition, District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., lists February 14, 2017 as the FIRST date of offense, pretty much almost a FULL MONTH LATER; so all 34 indictments IMMEDIATELY are clearly out of the scope of Donald Trump’s association – participation - oversight of the same.
Count 5 involves the attorney Michael Cohen at the Donald Trump Revocable Trust on February 16, 2017 and a false business record entry on March 16, 2017 which appears to be tied in (on its face) to the March 17, 2017 issues of counts 6 and 7 of the phony 34 count indictment.
Count 8 again involves Attorney Michael Cohen, now on April 13, 2017 for the second 4 of the 34 counts as being the lone felony law breaker at hand that any indictment could or should have been made.
Counts 9 and 10 deal with 2 more falsifying business entries that allegedly happened on June 19, 2017, a full 5 months after Donald Trump was fully separated by association – participation - oversight of the same; and it is attorney Michael Cohen who is to blame.
Counts 11 and 12 then appear to be founded on the premise of counts 9 and 10, but happening a month earlier on May 22, 2017, where it involves attorney Michael Cohen’s invoice. So why isn’t Cohen charged here? He is now involved with Counts 5 through 12 of these indictments as the sole pain in the ass alleged falsifier so far.
On and on we go, all through the rest of the 34 counts, it is attorney Michael Cohen who falsified business records, until the end or 34th count on December 5, 2017. The 34 counts read as if a turning of State’s Evidence, MANUFACTURED to read upon an innocent party or client for the sins of a crooked and CONVICTED Attorney.
A Google Search on April 4, 2023 gives the quote:
“On December 12, 2018, Cohen was sentenced to three years in federal prison and ordered to pay a $50,000 fine after pleading guilty to tax evasion and campaign-finance violations.
On February 26, 2019, he was disbarred from practicing law in the state of New York by the New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division.”
So now, the sins of the convicted and disbarred attorney are to be projected onto an innocent client, far removed in time, in access, in oversight, in involvement with the alleged offenses?
The New York City District Attorney Alvin L. Bragg, Jr., should do us all a favor…step off a high rise Manhattan Building and go splat!