Concurrent Resoluting / Voiding out the Immediately Prior Congress's Unconstitutional Laws would be Supreme Court required

If Congress passes an unConstitutional law or series of laws, the tactic is to have a new Congress pass the Concurrent Resolution, and that passage of a Concurrent Resolution to nullify that which is unConstitutional by the immediately prior Congress. This Concurrent Resoultion gives the new Congress Article III standing in the US Supreme Court when there is just cause, such as a usurper like Obama, a non-US NBC as sitting in the Presidency unlawfully and signing things into law he has no right to do.


The Supreme Court has ruled that a President receives his executive authority “either from an act of Congress or from the Constitution itself,” Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer, 343 U.S. 579, 585 (1952).

Both the House and the Senate must pass something in declaration and challenge (an act of Congress as acceptable to the Court within the confines of 333 US 579, before ousting a sitting putative President on the grounds of his being unConstitutional, even a usurper.

Thereafter the Senate can self-elect a replacement. But before this later action can be carried out...the US Supreme Court must first hear the case that has been denied the Birthers and concurrent resoluted in Congress by both houses...denied not on its merits, but on Article III standing...and I am extremely confident that the majority decision will be to agree with the defendants (Congress) that anything signed by an unConstitutional President or Usurping Office Holder, is void and tossed out.

The Supreme Court would require the grass-roots will of the people to be exercised in this fashion, where the people rise up, vote in those who will so vote to void and defund unConstitutionality by the immediately prior House (and immediately prior / concurrent Senate) Congress, and make the correction themselves. The use of Marbury v. Madison goes to a reality where the US Supreme Court has a "second" stamp of approval or disapproval upon Congress visiting or revisiting Constitutionality adherence upon itself via corrective majority votes and corrective legislation to self-void what it later discovered to be incorrect.

The Obama Administration could either let the Concurrent Resolution void stand, or take Congress to the US Supreme Court, and lose in both circumstances because in Court, Article III standing is created in Congress by the will of the people who elected them and their expressed or desired interests to "void" unConstitutional purchases of goods and services they are being mafia strong-armed to buy violating several Amendments of the US Constitution.


All Congress need do is show that Barack Obama is NOT a US Natural Born Citizen, hence was unconstitutional and unfit to have even run for office, (as is easy enough to do via his non-citizen father, 40 relevant Supreme Court cases and various US Codes and other documents beyond those 40 to other that point, including laws stating that when a minor female marries a foreign citizen male, the dominance of the citizenship status transfers to the adult male). Hence, any child born to such a married couple follows the father in 1961, just as it would from the signing of the US Constitution to the Act of May 24, 1934 as Justice Bader-Ginsberg lamented about, during the oral arguments of Nguyen v. INS in 2001.


In fact, the internationally recognized natural born status of the child extends back from Biblical times (1551 B.C. ff. with the genealogies in first 5 books of the Bible, the dating I use of 1551 B.C. is confirmed to within 25 years by Patristic quotes Greek historians in antiquity) as being "paternal" in requirements, and more recently from the times of Plato (b. ca. 427 B.C. ) and his writings (generally ca. 390ish to 347 B.C.), and the use of autochthon and its association and attachment of multi-generation paternal lineage to the land upon which the great grandchildren through the sons (hence fathers) dwell. And it is from Plato and the Greeks to Vattel and even our present day, such as the laws of US and Kenyan and British Citizenships that we can also slam those wishing to argue International Law as arguing frivolously / incompetently at such a time.


Therefore, a new Conservative Congress after presenting the overwhelming data to the US Supreme Court that Barack Obama is NOT a US NBC, using info such as I have scribd and various birther lawyers and informed birthers have posted (as relevant and at that time presented in legal brief and argued); the US Supreme Court can then, at that time, then turn around and declare Obama unconstitutional and order him removed from Office, and so order that via the US Constitution, the US Senate can at that time vote for a new President of the USA according to their choosing.

So, I must disagree with those who might say this tactic would not work...because it will, if implemented. Again, yes, it is a tactic that legally WILL work...because the goal is to get the US Supreme Court to declare Obama unConstitutional, giving the same victory we otherwise would have already acheived had not so many conspired to protect their arch-criminal they themselves daily empower and enable.


OBAMA HIMSELF DEMANDED WE HOLD HIM ACCOUNTABLE

On May 21, 2009 Obama made his pitch and challenge while standing before the US Constitution and Declaration of Independence, almost as if pledging after the manner of a legally binding utterance. Therefore, his words should be used against him in voiding his usurpation and unConstitutional takeover of the US Presidency.

http://cspan.org/Watch/Media/2009/05/21/HP/A/18855/Pres+Obama+Speech+on+National+Security.aspx

1) "I ran for President promising transparency, and I meant what I said. That is why, whenever possible, we will make information available to the American people so that they can make informed judgments and hold us accountable.” @ 37:10-37:23 on the C-Span video link



2) “…whenever we cannot release certain information to the public for valid national security reasons, I will insist that there is oversight of my actions - by Congress or by the courts.” @ 37:54-38:07 on the C-Span link



3) “…in our system of checks and balances, someone must always watch over the watchers - especially when it comes to sensitive information.” @ 38:28 – 38:39 on the C-span link



4) “I will never hide the truth because it is uncomfortable. I will deal with Congress and the courts as co-equal branches of government. I will tell the American people what I know and don't know, and when I release something publicly or keep something secret, I will tell you why." @ 40:44 - 41:01 on the C-span link


All 4 times Obama lied.

1) He never allows for transparency, and demands America not hold him accountable unless it fits his Communist-Socialist Agenda or Public Relations/Propaganda push (such as unConstitutionally forced Healthcare and public options, etc.).

2) Obama releases top secret CIA and other high Intelligence info to our enemies, materially helping them.

3) Obama refuses to allow hucksters like Frank and Dodd or any in his Administration be criticized without turning around and trying to hit back twice as hard with smear campaigns and the Communist Saul Alinsky's tactics to isolate and destroy their public persona.

4) We still have no proof that Obama was even USA born. We have NO Obama Long Form BC, and other relevant papers or documentation (such as passports, US school and college transcripts regarding declared citizenship and financial status). He hides any 333 US 640 @ 653 accountability, and refuses to tell us why.


Obama lies habitually because that is his nature, and his spiritual mentors and advisors are also liars like himself who made Obama twice the child of hades as they were...only America likes to fall for the tricks he learned of being disarmed by being smiled at.


Obama in Dreams from My Father, writes and is heard in his own voice at ( http://www.khow.com/pages/caplisreport.html ):

"It was usually an effective tactic, another one of those tricks I had learned: People were satisfied as long as you were courteous and smiled and made no sudden moves. They were more than satisfied; they were relieved...." pg 94







If Congress passes an unConstitutional law or series of laws, the tactic is to have a new Congress pass the Concurrent Resolution, and that passage of a Concurrent Resolution to nullify that which is unConstitutional by the immediately prior Congress. This Concurrent Resoultion gives the new Congress Article III standing in the US Supreme Court when there is just cause, such as a usurper like Obama, a non-US NBC as sitting in the Presidency unlawfully and signing things into law he has no right to do. Both the House and the Senate must pass something in declaration and challenge before ousting a sitting putative President, even a usurper.


Thereafter the Senate can self-elect a replacement. But before this later action can be carried out...the US Supreme Court must first hear the case that has been denied the Birthers and concurrent resoluted in Congress by both houses...denied not on its merits, but on Article III standing...and I am extremely confident that the majority decision will be to agree with the defendants (Congress) that anything signed by an unConstitutional President or Usurping Office Holder, is void and tossed out.

The Supreme Court would require the grass-roots will of the people to be exercised in this fashion, where the people rise up, vote in those who will so vote to void and defund unConstitutionality by the immediately prior House (and immediately prior / concurrent Senate) Congress, and make the correction themselves. The use of Marbury v. Madison goes to a reality where the US Supreme Court has a "second" stamp of approval or disapproval upon Congress visiting or revisiting Constitutionality adherence upon itself via corrective majority votes and corrective legislation to self-void what it later discovered to be incorrect.

The Obama Administration could either let the Concurrent Resolution void stand, or take Congress to the US Supreme Court, and lose in both circumstances because in Court, Article III standing is created in Congress by the will of the people who elected them and their expressed or desired interests to "void" unConstitutional purchases of goods and services they are being mafia strong-armed to buy violating several Amendments of the US Constitution.

All Congress need do is show that Barack Obama is NOT a US Natural Born Citizen, hence was unconstitutional and unfit to have even run for office, (as is easy enough to do via his non-citizen father, 40 relevant Supreme Court cases and various US Codes and other documents beyond those 40 to other that point, including laws stating that when a minor female marries a foreign citizen male, the dominance of the citizenship status transfers to the adult male). Hence, any child born to such a married couple follows the father in 1961, just as it would from the signing of the US Constitution to the Act of May 24, 1934 as Justice Bader-Ginsberg lamented about, during the oral arguments of Nguyen v. INS in 2001.

In fact, the internationally recognized natural born status of the child extends back from Biblical times (1551 B.C. ff. with the genealogies in first 5 books of the Bible, the dating I use of 1551 B.C. is confirmed to within 25 years by Patristic quotes Greek historians in antiquity) as being "paternal" in requirements, and more recently from the times of Plato (b. ca. 427 B.C. ) and his writings (generally ca. 390ish to 347 B.C.), and the use of autochthon and its association and attachment of multi-generation paternal lineage to the land upon which the great grandchildren through the sons (hence fathers) dwell. And it is from Plato and the Greeks to Vattel and even our present day, such as the laws of US and Kenyan and British Citizenships that we can also slam those wishing to argue International Law as arguing frivolously / incompetently at such a time.

Therefore, a new Conservative Congress after presenting the overwhelming data to the US Supreme Court that Barack Obama is NOT a US NBC, using info such as I have scribd and various birther lawyers and informed birthers have posted (as relevant and at that time presented in legal brief and argued); the US Supreme Court can then, at that time, then turn around and declare Obama unconstitutional and order him removed from Office, and so order that via the US Constitution, the US Senate can at that time vote for a new President of the USA according to their choosing.


So, I must disagree with those who might say this tactic would not work...because it will, if implemented. Again, yes, it is a tactic that legally WILL work...because the goal is to get the US Supreme Court to declare Obama unConstitutional, giving the same victory we otherwise would have already acheived had not so many conspired to protect their arch-criminal they themselves daily empower and enable.

Recommended Candidates for 2010: Cece Heil, Star Parker, Gary Berntsen

Readers here will have likely already seen the recommended Lt. Col Allen West and Marco Rubio videos I have previously posted.  Most will also be familiar with Rand Paul already.  So I will post the other candidates I have recommended to be elected for the offices they are seeking...



Concurrent Resolution Unconstitutional Healthcare right out of existence: Cece Heil




Star Parker





Gary Berntsen  (From 2005)








Stephen Broden




Orly Taitz
 (Keep in mind, she is a naturalized US Citizen and anti-Communist immigrated from Soviet Russia...so some of her phrasing in grounded in Russian as being a native tongue, not English.)

A Retired General speaks out: Paul Vallely on the Communist-Socialists, aka. Progressives in US Federal Government

Youtube Video link from Lincoln Reagan dinner in Virginia, City Montana May 5, 2010


Update [07/24/2010]:


Tea-party candidate in Tennessee, Cece Heil, offered a tactic of using Concurrent Resolution to stop an unConstitutional Healthcare as already void...not voidable, but void (illegal to implement).


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m4qUfJfGNTM&feature=player_embedded#!


I say, we need to push the 2010 election into not just a "game-changer or game-winning strategy", but a "nation saver or a nation winning" strategy, to get our Republic back, and save it from the Communist-Socialists before they seize absolute power.

It is not a losing strategy where those like former Congressman Tom Tancredo on 07/22/2010, called for Obama's impeachment in the Washington Times.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jul/22/the-case-for-impeachment/

http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=182929


You cannot tactically impeach someone who isn't legally President, you must use the courts, and now with Cece Heil's input, I realize Congress as well, to oust him.


So if by concurrent resolution Congress can, in regard to illegal legislation that is unConstitutional, void an illegal passage of a bill into law that was wrongfully passed by a prior Congress by being unconstitutional...and done so by Congressional majority, as Cece Heil explains, perhaps Obama also as well...and NOT JUST all prior legislation he and Congress has passed.


It is a legal strategy and a peaceful route that may very well set the Communist-Socialists back on their ear by having a simple majority of dedicated Conservatives and Constitutionalists in Congress nullifying the Usurper and unConstitutional -- (foreign natural born citizen via his foreign national father, Kenyan national and Communist Barack Hussein Obama I) -- Barack Hussein Obama II.


This nation saving and nation winning strategy will then allow us to use the Courts to see Obama prosecuted following a New Conservative majority Congress installed in January 2011, and Congress will then have standing to introduce all the information the Birthers have had, by their own legislative challenges and also via the US Supreme Court, and see Obama and his co-conspirators imprisoned. This will at worst, have minor incidents of civil unrest among some unionists and some minorities with the minimum damage to this country, and no damage to the Constitution nor the creating of counter-productive legal precedents, because Obama was illegal to run or be elected to begin with.


That's the new battle plan. Take it up, spread the word, and share it with everyone you know. Let every TEA PARTIER share this Concurrent Resolution Election Strategy with every Tea Party and Conservative they know, regardless of Party affiliation...and get commitments from those running in 2010 to join the plan to SAVE THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FROM COMMUNIST-SOCIALISM!!

This it goes far beyond a simple smoke and mirrors distraction of a technicality, which the conspirators of the Left (who seek to overthrow this Republic entirely) seek to do.

If the overwhelming majority of America's voters are FED UP with the Communist-Socialist and Big Brother takeovers and abuses by Obama and Pelosi and a corrupt Congress, and get fired up...they can make their  elective candidates for November 2010 also get fired up to Concurrent Resolution Obama, Pelosi, and Reid out of their positions of power, and see them prosecuted and imprisoned (being on an even lower moral level than if they were just mega-Madoff or mega-Enron crooks), and charge them with treason, sedition, fraud, and conspiracy to overthrow the United States of America.

Take the plan and pass it along.


It's time for we the people to rise up as one, and bring Liberty to ourselves by removing the yoke of those who would oppress and enslave us with unneccesary laws, fines, punishments, taxes, and unConstitutional abuses of power.


Now is the time...the time is NOW to act and press restoring our fredoms and liberties before they are entirely taken away. Rise up America! Black, brown, or white; poor or rich or in between; man or woman; born here or immigrated. I say unto you America, RISE UP and take back the Liberties and Constitution given you by G-D and His Sovereign grace and Loving-Kindness...and don't cease in the fight untill all of the victory is won. Yes America, get fired up, and rise up as ONE!

Whistleblower reveals black racism prominent in Obama Administration Department of Justice via Political Agenda and Political Appointees

Obama's Direct Social Security Number Fraud Access Accidentally Revealed?

http://www.staradvertiser.com/features/20100627_No_birth_certificate_needed_to_verify_Oba mas_old_Arcadia_job.html

"No birth certificate needed to verify Obama's old Arcadia job" By Wayne Harada
01:30 a.m. HST, Jun 27, 2010
reported that:
"Barack Obama...once worked in food services at the Punahou Street retirement complex while attending Punahou School."

In response to a letter written by the Sr. Citizen Home CEO asking for Obama's recollection, Obama wrote back saying:

"I remember those days in Punahou and my time working at Arcadia, and I am still influenced by the aloha spirit and all the wonderful people of Hawaii. I learned so much from my family, my friends and teachers during that time."

Says reporter Wayne Harada of the Home for Senior Citizens location: "... the home is equidistant between Punahou and Obama's one-time Beretania Street residence."

 --------------------------------------------------------

Unless Obama had a school work permit, which we have no reason to believe he had, since he hides even his Punahou school records...we might as call it for what it probably is.

It's called working "under the table" or "off the books". Obama likely was paid cash in hand at an x-amount for temporary work, and did not report it for tax deductions. The payment was likely determined on the amount of work accomplished as determined by the one supervising the undocumented temp employees.

But to be fair, even if he had a school issued work permit, this clearly presents another even more serious dilemma for Obama...the SS Card fraud, whereby Obama has used a Connecticut SS# for many years.

As we are informed from Obama himself in his auto-biography, it was at this period of his life he was blowing money on drugs. He had to get the money from somewhere. And who knows if his access to such a place allowed him to reap fringe benefits (watches, jewelry, and knick-knacks lying around for pawning off) so that he really could kick back and think of all the great "highs" he got from working there (even briefly) and think of what a great (almost carefree) "aloha" time he had in those days some 30 odd years ago.

Could Obama also have lifted the Connecticut Social Security number and card from such a place as this very retirement home? Yes. Very easily. 

The result of this story is being that , now in July 2010, there is an almost direct connection and means, motive, access/opportunity to someone born in the 1890s. The SS# fraud now fits in such a way as there is enough information for a Criminal Investigation of this in conjunction with other Identity Investigations on Obama, and who and what he is in regard to his international citizenship, as to find what the blank that is. Thus, even the Liberals must be embarassed that the SS# fraud of Obama now clearly not only fits, but appears quite reasonable as a possibility / probability.

The Obama BC fraud is still being collaterally substantiated and exposed, even if bit by bit with information the Liberals thought otherwise of.

Lt. Col Allen West says it on the mark, again!

July 4th remembered

Let all be as a band of Brothers and rise superior to every injury, whether real or imaginary and persevere in the arduous but glorious struggle in which we are engaged, 'till Peace and Independence are secured to our Country.


George Washington

Letter to BRIGADIER GENERAL ANTHONY WAYNE, Head Quarters, September 6, 1780.





There are four things, which I humbly conceive, are essential to the well being, I may even venture to say, to the existence of the United States as an Independent Power:


1st. An indissoluble Union of the States under one Federal Head.


2dly. A Sacred regard to Public Justice.


3dly. The adoption of a proper Peace Establishment, and


4thly. The prevalence of that pacific and friendly Disposition, among the People of the United States, which will induce them to forget their local prejudices and policies, to make those mutual concessions which are requisite to the general prosperity, and in some instances, to sacrifice their individual advantages to the interest of the Community.


These are the pillars on which the glorious Fabrick of our Independency and National Character must be supported; Liberty is the Basis, and whoever would dare to sap the foundation, or overturn the Structure, under whatever specious pretexts he may attempt it, will merit the bitterest execration, and the severest punishment which can be inflicted by his injured Country.


…Many other considerations might here be adduced to prove, that without an entire conformity to the Spirit of the Union, we cannot exist as an Independent Power; it will be sufficient for my purpose to mention but one or two which seem to me of the greatest importance. It is only in our united Character as an Empire, that our Independence is acknowledged, that our power can be regarded, or our Credit supported among Foreign Nations. The Treaties of the European Powers with the United States of America, will have no validity on a dissolution of the Union. We shall be left nearly in a state of Nature, or we may find by our own unhappy experience, that there is a natural and necessary progression, from the extreme of anarchy to the extreme of Tyranny; and that arbitrary power is most easily established on the ruins of Liberty abused to licentiousness.

George Washington (From his 13 copies of his) CIRCULAR TO THE STATES

Head Quarters, Newburgh, June 8, 1783





Brothers: I am happy to see you here. I am glad the long Journey you have made, has done you no harm; and that you are in good health: I am glad also you left All our friends of the Delaware Nation well.


…Brothers: I have read your paper. The things you have said are weighty things, and I have considered them well. The Delaware Nation have shown their good will to the United States. They have done wisely …


Brothers: I am a Warrior. My words are few and plain; but I will make good what I say. 'Tis my business to destroy all the Enemies of these States and to protect their friends.


…Brothers: Listen well to what I tell you and let it sink deep into your Hearts. We love our friends, and will be faithful to them, as long as they will be faithful to us. We are sure our Good brothers the Delawares will always be so. But we have sworn to take vengeance on our Enemies, and on false friends.


…My ears hear with pleasure the other matters you mention. Congress will be glad to hear them too. You do well to wish to learn our arts and ways of life, and above all, the religion of Jesus Christ. These will make you a greater and happier people than you are. Congress will do every thing they can to assist you in this wise intention; and to tie the knot of friendship and union so fast, that nothing shall ever be able to loose it.

George Washington’s SPEECH TO THE DELAWARE CHIEFS

Head Quarters, Middle Brook, May 12, 1779.




The Declaration of Independence

The Unanimous Declaration of the Thirteen United States of America      July 4, 1776

When, in the course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bonds which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the laws of nature and of nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.


We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights, that among these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive to these ends, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shown that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security. --

Such has been the patient sufferance of these colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former systems of government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute tyranny over these states. To prove this, let facts be submitted to a candid world.


He has refused his assent to laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his governors to pass laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of representation in the legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved representative houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the legislative powers, incapable of annihilation, have returned to the people at large for their exercise; the state remaining in the meantime exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavored to prevent the population of these states; for that purpose obstructing the laws for naturalization of foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the conditions of new appropriations of lands.

He has obstructed the administration of justice, by refusing his assent to laws for establishing judiciary powers.

He has made judges dependent on his will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, standing armies without the consent of our legislature.

He has affected to render the military independent of and superior to civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation:

For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:


For protecting them, by mock trial, from punishment for any murders which they should commit on the inhabitants of these states:


For cutting off our trade with all parts of the world:


For imposing taxes on us without our consent:


For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of trial by jury:


For transporting us beyond seas to be tried for pretended offenses:


For abolishing the free system of English laws in a neighboring province, establishing therein an arbitrary government, and enlarging its boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule in these colonies:


For taking away our charters, abolishing our most valuable laws, and altering fundamentally the forms of our governments:


For suspending our own legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.


He has abdicated government here, by declaring us out of his protection and waging war against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burned our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large armies of foreign mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow citizens taken captive on the high seas to bear arms against their country, to become the executioners of their friends and brethren, or to fall themselves by their hands.


He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavored to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian savages, whose known rule of warfare, is undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.


In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms: our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have we been wanting in attention to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, enemies in war, in peace friends.

We, therefore, the representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the name, and by the authority of the good people of these colonies, solemnly publish and declare, that these united colonies are, and of right ought to be free and independent states; that they are absolved from all allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the state of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as free and independent states, they have full power to levy war, conclude peace, contract alliances, establish commerce, and to do all other acts and things which independent states may of right do. And for the support of this declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor.


JOHN HANCOCK, President

Attested, CHARLES THOMSON, Secretary
New Hampshire

JOSIAH BARTLETT
WILLIAM WHIPPLE
MATTHEW THORNTON


Massachusetts-Bay
SAMUEL ADAMS
JOHN ADAMS
ROBERT TREAT PAINE
ELBRIDGE GERRY


Rhode Island
STEPHEN HOPKINS
WILLIAM ELLERY


Connecticut
ROGER SHERMAN
SAMUEL HUNTINGTON
WILLIAM WILLIAMS
OLIVER WOLCOTT


Georgia
BUTTON GWINNETT
LYMAN HALL
GEO. WALTON


Maryland
SAMUEL CHASE
WILLIAM PACA
THOMAS STONE
CHARLES CARROLL OF CARROLLTON


Virginia
GEORGE WYTHE
RICHARD HENRY LEE
THOMAS JEFFERSON
BENJAMIN HARRISON
THOMAS NELSON, JR.
FRANCIS LIGHTFOOT LEE
CARTER BRAXTON.


New York
WILLIAM FLOYD
PHILIP LIVINGSTON
FRANCIS LEWIS
LEWIS MORRIS


Pennsylvania
ROBERT MORRIS
BENJAMIN RUSH
BENJAMIN FRANKLIN
JOHN MORTON
GEORGE CLYMER
JAMES SMITH
GEORGE TAYLOR
JAMES WILSON
GEORGE ROSS


Delaware
CAESAR RODNEY
GEORGE READ
THOMAS M'KEAN


North Carolina
WILLIAM HOOPER
JOSEPH HEWES
JOHN PENN


South Carolina
EDWARD RUTLEDGE
THOMAS HEYWARD, JR.
THOMAS LYNCH, JR.
ARTHUR MIDDLETON


New Jersey
RICHARD STOCKTON
JOHN WITHERSPOON
FRANCIS HOPKINS

JOHN HART

ABRAHAM CLARK  
 

Frank Marshall Davis, a review of Obama's teenage mentor 1931-1963. 133 plus FBI file pages, etc. summarized.

The entire 600 pages of the FBI reports on Frank Marshall Davis and other useful information  can be obtained by Accuracy In Media Report editor Cliff Kincaid's website at:  

http://usasurvival.org/marshall.fbi.files.html

I also recommend 
http://newzeal.blogspot.com/ 
and
http://www.keywiki.org/index.php/Main_Page

as starting points for those wishing to do their own expedited and reliable research.
(Brianroy)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Beginning with a key Communist mentor of Frank Marshall Davis:

The Soviet Union archives, now back to being the Russian archives,  in their 1938 Comintern Archives Fond, 495, Opis 74, Delo 467, pp. 29-30, introduces us first to one of Frank Marshall Davis's key mentors,  the Communist Party USA’s Central Committee candidate member William L. Patterson.


Born in 1891, Chicago, Illinois citizen and Communist William L. Patterson served in the Communist Party USA from 1926 to 1929.


After Patterson did his stint serving as a delegate to the 6th Congress of the Communists USA in 1928, in 1929, he decided to “join the Revolution” at the source, and transferred his membership from the United States to the Soviet Union (there his Russian Soviet membership stayed active until at least 1938, where the dated Comintern 495.74.46.29-30 record of 1938 ends).


Patterson operated the Soviet styled "Workers School of Chicago" and renamed it to the “Abraham Lincoln School”. 

FM Davis would guest lecture there in the early 1944. One lecture for one night per week during the Spring Session.


In February 1944, FM Davis's lectures included "United Nations on the March", and another was " Africa and the Colonial World". Present was William L. Patterson, who referred to Davis as "a member of the Church", a Communist dues paying member in good or excellent standing (in their codespeak).

Patterson was a trainer of young Communists, including that of Frank Marshall Davis.

In April 1944, Patterson boasted at the "Abraham Lincoln School" (formerly the "Workers School) of Frank Marshall Davis as very interested in the Soviet Union and a poet in his own right. The American Communist joined Soviet Union Communist party member called Davis as "very progressive"...meaning that Davis was very hard core, even by American pro-Soviet Union Era Communist standards in 1944. For historians of this period, such a compliment should be frightening; and it highlights Davis' core zeal in his pro-Soviet Communist convictions.

Frank Marshall Davis was molded and motivated into being a Communist evangelist, sent out by Patterson to recruit non-Communists (especially negroes) into the fold.


Frank Marshall Davis was a Communist in good standing since 1931, in Atlanta, Georgia, where he was employed as an Associated or United Negro Press journalist.  In Atlanta, he became acquainted with Ben Davis, Jr., who was funded by the Communist Party to defend two negroes in high profile cases in the Atlanta area. Frank Marshall Davis moved to Chicago in 1934, and continued his employment as a newspaperman with the Associated Negro Press (or some variant name of that), where he also served as an Executive ANP Secretary.


Davis lived in Chicago in 1934 and remained until 1948. 

In 1944, he was on the sponsoring committee that celebrated "the 20th anniversary of the 'Daily Worker' held at Orchestra Hall" on January 6th.


In some 600 pages of FBI documents, FM Davis apparently  only once in his file was referred to as having been a Communist from at least 1931. In 1931, Davis was a journalist in Atlanta.    In effect,  FM Davis spent some 14 to 16 years under the surveillance on the Communists in the USA radar, if you will.  Davis, although active as a Communist,  as with most pre-II negro Communists, Davis was simply off the grid because the FBI was still developing, growing, and primarily concerned with violent crimes and expanding its law enforcement powers to be interstate pursuing and well armed and trained.  Once the FBI developed, the Davis file began...and that wasn't until 1942.


In the some 600 pages of Freedom of Information Act  material on Frank Marshall Davis, we next find that in 1948, Davis took his wife and moved to Hawaii at the behest of the Central Party ("Mainland") Communists who were seeking to take over the territory of Hawaii, utilizing the ILWU (the International Longshoremen and Warehousemen’s Union) and his Communist Party Leadership in Hawaii connections, Paul Robeson, Harry Bridges, and Jack Hall.

On July 18, 1948, the FBI was clandestinely informed that the Communist Party USA Central Committee ordered Dwight James Freeman to Hawaii, to chair and operate as head Communist there. His first order of business was to get a Communist pro-Communist Propaganda Newspaper going. On August 8, 1948, the Honolulu Record was in business, with Koji Ariyoshi as its Editor. Ariyoshi hired on Frank Marshall Davis as one of his editorial columnists.

In the February 23, 1956 issue, p. 8, Davis wrote:

“I told my astonished Islander friends that the white supremacy opinions of Clark Howell were nothing new to me. He had the same rigid beliefs on segregation when I was in Atlanta 25 years ago.”


In 1950, the FBI informant within the high levels of Hawaii’s Communists reported that upper levels of the Communist Party in Hawaii splintered into groups of three, and went underground. This differed from the slightly larger groups of 4 to 9 in the Los Angeles area, for example. The informant was chairman or head of group number 6, while Frank Marshall Davis was over in and head of group number 10. Davis’ wife Helen was member number 2, and the third member was left unidentified.

------------------------------------------------
{Of a side note:
It may be deduced that from Barack Obama himself that Barack Obama’s white grandfather was by late  1960  a member of the Communist Party of Hawaii’s group number 10, via the code word usage that “drinking buddies” that Barack auto-biographical uses to decribe his white grandfather Stanley Dunham and Frank Marshall Davis.  "Drinking Buddies" was not just a literal boozing, but also was used as code for "collaborators of the same Communist cell."}
-----------------------------------------------


Davis kept an office near the airport in a Drown Transfer company building in a section called the Damon Tract, and Frank Marshall Davis was listed in a 05/14/56 internal security FBI report as the President of the by then defunct Hawaii Civil Rights Congress. But his FBI File HN 100-5082 also reports that the unredacted Secretary under Davis controlled the purse strings and actually ran the Hawaii Civil Rights Congress more than Davis did.



Davis having filed for bankruptcy on April 30, 1956, and was working then as a salesman at the Osborne Company at 1888 Kalakaua Avenue in Honolulu, allegedly “selling calendars and other advertising specialties.” His residence was listed as 47-388 Kam Highway, Kahaluu, Oahu in a report dated 10/19/56 and unclassified on 04/24/97. But by the next updated report, it was stated that Davis had moved from that Kam Hwy residence elsewhere. It was later reported in Davis’ FBI file as being to 2994 Kalihi Street, Honolulu.

In May 1957, F.M. Davis filed divorce papers against his wife, calling her a “psychopath with a father fixation”, but eventually dropped the filing when he found out by August that she was pregnant. It is unclear if Davis knew if he or the “mainland musician who was employed in a Waikiki night spot” was the father of the unborn twins until perhaps after their births.  Davis had moved out and was living in the Central YMCA on Atkinson Drive in Honolulu as late as August 7th or 8th, 1957. On February 10, 1958, Davis’ FBI file reports that “his wife gave birth to twin daughters.”

In the January 14, 1958 FBI report, Davis was still employed by the Osborne Company, but was working out of his residence.



The law Offices of Bouslog-Symonds, Union Attorneys for both the United Public Workers (UPW) and the International Longshoremen and Warehousemen’s Union (ILWU), represented known Communist seditionists prosecuted in the Hawaii Smith Act cases (re: HN 62-374). When 20 Communists and Communist Sympathizers, plus 1 more secret informant were subpoenaed to appear before the Senate Subcommittee, Davis refused to answer questions about his Communist Party membership, while 18 others plead the Fifth Amendment.

The FBI file simply summarizes that Davis refused to testify before the Senate Internal Security Sub-Committee in 11/56.

On December 6, 1956, the Honolulu Advertiser reported that 3 Secret Witnesses and former Communists reported that the islands of Hawaii only had approximately 150 Communists just before the start of the Korean War.

Relevant to this era is an FBI undercover informant and high Communist member in Hawaii’s testimony:

THE COMMUNIST PARTY'S COLD WAR AGAINST CONGRESSIONAL INVESTIGATION OF SUBVERSION REPORT

AND

TESTIMONY OF ROBERT CARRILLO RONSTADT

COMMITTEE ON UN-AMERICAN ACTIVITIES

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

EIGHTY-SEVENTH CONGRESS

SECOND SESSION

OCTOBER 10, 1962

(Including Index)



1502 COLD WAR AGAINST INVESTIGATION OF SUBVERSION

…in the security clubs, the number of people in each"


one was cut down drastically~

As a matter of fact, I understand that they ranged maybe from four to eight people, nine people at the most.







COLD WAR AGAINST INVESTIGATION OF SUBVERSION 1507

For awhile there, in 1952, I was given a particular assignment, for instance, to bring back to the Communist Party people that had been given a leave from the party due to the Taft-Hartley Act.






If you will recall, when that was passed, part of it states that you can't be a Communist. So what the party did was to give these people a leave. In other words, cut them off, but the party found out that these people who had been cut off were drifting away from the Communist Party. I was given the assignment to contact these people and to bring them back into the party.








COLD WAR AGAINST INVESTIGATION OF SUBVERSION 1509



due to the build-up of pressure against the Communist Party in the United States, that we had to face the possibility of going underground, and that this would be really the beginning, or part of that movement.


I remember Seattle was mentioned, namely, that I would go to


Seattle and that I would go underground there.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

[Side note 2:
http://keywiki.org/index.php/Stanley_Armour_Dunham
      In 1955, Obama's mother moved to Seattle with her parents and attended the East Shore Unitarian Church with her parents, which the Chicago Tribune on March 27, 2007, reported was known to be "In the 1950s, ...sometimes known as 'the little Red church on the hill.' "  The testimony of the FBI informant leads us to believe that either Stanley or Madelyn Dunham, or both, were off the grid underground Communists.
They would move to Hawaii in 1960.
http://keywiki.org/index.php/Stanley_Ann_Dunham

It is at that time, Stanley Dunham was...it seems to me...assigned to the Hawaiian Communist Party's Cell #10 under the leadership of Frank Marshall Davis, making the Dunhams #4 and #5 to Frank Marshall Davis' Communist Party Cell.    }

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

During the Korean War, the actual number of people who dropped out was about 10%, according to the 1956 Senatorial Internal Security Sub-Committee information (HN 62-374 cont’d). The ILWU had by 12/13/56 spent a total of $109,970 of members dues defending Communist subversives prosecuted in Smith Act cases. Closed Communist Party meetings of this period were reported to the sub-committee to have held at the homes of those held in prominence, including those of the ILWU and those who were called “former Communist Party members”. At one point, the ILWU considered purchasing the Honolulu Record and running it as a bi-weekly paper after Davis had left the Honolulu Record. Davis was enthusiastic about returning as a columnist once the ILWU purchased it, and also stated that “Russia feels from experience that socialism is the best way of life for people and that she will, therefore, do everything to help bring it about wherever possible.” Davis then affirmed his conviction to the FBI Informant that he, Davis, believed in “the dictatorship of the proletariat”. When challenged by the informant, Davis replied that “socialism cannot be expected to take the same form in every country, but that the customs and traditions of each country must be considered.”

“Davis went on to declare that whatever form it did take in this country, the socialist countries would be standing by to assist.”

The FBI attached Frank Marshall Davis in reference and connection to “Soviet Activities in the United States”, and referred those who read his file to the espionage sub-section in the 29 volumes of the Judiciary sub-committee transcripts of the “Scope of Soviet Activity in the United States”.

The FBI file lists that in 1957 Davis “championed the policies of Soviet Russia;” often demonstrating this with dozens of FM Davis own writings in a side by side comparison of Soviet policies with FM Davis simply mirroring and self-adapting the Party Propaganda to suit his own areas of interest.

The final edition of the Honolulu Record Publishing Company Ltd. was on July 3, 1958, where after it became owned, operated, and run by the ILWU. The paper shut down, and the ILWU began issuing weekly publications in after June 1959, but still ran its offices as the new “Hawaiian Reporter”, pending a de facto publication start.

Frank Marshall Davis utilized the offices of a new ILWU weekly newspaper, The Hawaiian Reporter, to accept “business messages and telephone calls.” Davis’ conduct in the offices was self-confessedly reported by Davis as being that of a “haole (Caucasian) hater”, and the ILWU top brass disapproved of such language and conduct in their offices, and in his column submissions.

By July of 1959, Davis left the Osborne Company and was employed by the (Honolulu of ) Wright Company of Syracuse, New York in outside sales. With a falling out with the ILWU top brass, he was forced to move his business messaging and telephone calls to his home.

The FBI file reported that Davis appeared to have ceased in at least his obvious Communist Party activities and affiliations. But by December 1959, Davis was a sponsor for the “American Committee for Protection of Foreign Born” (ACPFB). 

 According to the FBI file quote of a 1973 Time Magazine article and actual pamphlet from the organization, the “American Committee for Protection of Foreign Born” was established first in 1933, and 40 years later, Frank Marshall Davis's name was featured prominently on the inside cover of the pamphlets they handed out as one of its 63 most prominent (partial list, hence principal) sponsors. The ACPFB argued that the laws should be changed so as to allow any illegal alien resident legality as a US Citizen by simply living on US Soil for 10 years. 

{Thus, all enemy alien spies, terrorists, and anyone in the world could then legally become US Citizens by simply living on US soil for 10 years, and demand they are US Citizens without ever having legience or interest in the furtherance of US Sovereignty, safety, sanctity, interests, or what-have-you.  These are Communist goals of creating anarchy within the enemy to Communism's political system so as to bring about its eventual collapse, and speed up the process of enabling that collapse.  Barack Obama in June 2010 repeated these goals when he spokeon Immigration, as I previously posted,  of Americans being Americans by faith, and not by blood or birth.  Obama was at that time espousing Communist Frank Marshall Davis and the goals of one of Davis' Communist Front Organizations...the ACPFB. That is why a look at Davis helps us understand some of the dynamics of Obama's Communist-Socialism reformulated for the American masses in our current times. } 




In the last week of November 1959, Frank Marshall Davis lamented that the Mainland Communists warned him that a move to Hawaii would make him “lethargic” in regards for Communism. While stating that such was not the case with him, “he guessed that the people were right inasmuch as he believed all the individuals in Hawaii who were formerly connected with the progressive movement were in such a state.”


On July 21, 1960, the FBI informants reported that Davis had expressed interest to being active in the local Hawaiian chapter of the NAACP (National Association for the Advancement of Colored People). He was “met with a rebuff because of his former connections with the Communist Party and front organizations in Honolulu.” (Internal Security Report dated 07/25/60, p.2)

The FBI Internal Security Report of July 31, 1961, stated that Mrs. Davis was selling Avon door to door, and Frank Marshall Davis spent his nights “babysitting”, and was expressing a hope of “emigrating to Ghana.” The report also stated that they saw no obvious Communist affiliations by Davis.

Hence, we may state that Davis could have simply been associating off the radar, as it were.  But as was the case earlier on in his life as a young adult, it did not neccessarily mean he was truly "inactive" as he himself professed he was not "lethargic" in his zeal or activities...only those around him were.  We may state that therefore Davis was working within his safe zones, and kept to comrades, keeping a very low profile and being very clandestine.

In an August 22, 1963, Internal Security update, Frank Marshall Davis was to meet with two FBI / US Internal Security Agents at "Kapiolani Park" at 11:30 am on the 26th,  to determine if he could be placed on the inactive list and removed from surveillances.  Davis was cordial  except on the subject of his Communist Party membership, clearly lied pretending and stating that there had never been a Communist Party in Hawaii, ever, and said he was motivated on issues of racial equality as his platform rather than International Politics (said the Internal Security report of the interview on 08/26/1963).  Davis said "that he would consort with the devil to gain his ends". 

Obama confesses his citizenship is based on the faith of others, not blood or birth? Is anyone listening?

[Updated July 2, 2010]

“Being an American is not a matter of blood or birth, it’s a matter of faith,” Obama declared...

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/07/01/obama_being_an_american_not_a_matter_of_blood_or_birth.html



Or in other words...Obama is saying to all Americans:

"I don't have a US Long Form birth certificate, my Kenyan Father was not an American, I probably wasn't even born in America, and who cares...so long as YOU have the faith I am an American Citizen, that's all it takes."


Is that a fair summary of what he said?


Really? Now he openly admits it and flaunts his alien status as an "in your face" taunt? Does any one else take it that way, or what?








Who is Obama?


1) He is someone who could care less about Russian spies on US soil. He therefore passive-aggressively supports Russian spies, but if they get caught, he isn't either for or against it.

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/106255-white-house-spy-arrests-wont-hurt-us-russia-relations

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/world/us_and_canada/10442223.stm


Why not? His father was an alien national and Communist, who might have been a Russian spy in Kenya for all we know. His mother also could have been a Russian spy of her own free will. And Obama describes himself as one who is "like a spy behind enemy lines" when in Manhattan. Was Obama working with Alice Palmer's KGB agent when he was her right hand man in Chicago?

http://newzeal.blogspot.com/2009/11/obama-file-90-alice-palmer-re-examined.html


Was Obama in contact with the KGB in NYC and in Massachusetts, and groomed by their American contacts? Perhaps vetted from his youth by Communist Frank Marshall Davis

http://newzeal.blogspot.com/2010/02/obama-file-96-coincidence-obama-frank.html

as well as his family?


Was Obama even born in the United States of America...or is his unsubstantiated claim just a Communist assisted cover-up by American Communists and active foreign agents? Foreign Communist agents like the 10 Russians waging a Second Cold War who were just caught in New York, and curiously, most all of them were also alleged to have been planted BEFORE Obama stopped working for Alice Palmer, the KGB mole hugger; after whose employ Barack Hussein Obama suddenly ascended among the Communist-Socialists of the DSA in Chicago almost immediately thereafter? Was Obama also an American Case Officer or go-between liason of Russian Spies as a State Senator aka. Community Organizer, using his SEIU, ACORN, and other connections?



Ask the questions America. We don't even know where this guy was born, what his birth weight was, if he even actually attended Columbia University or just spent a 3 day weekend there or what.


2) He is someone who nominates an unqualified and non-jurist to be processed before the US Senate, who is on record as an avowed Socialist with Communist and Socialist associations and leanings, as well as a progressive agenda to change the meaning of Free Speech to whatever a Government entity dictates is NOT a harm to that Gov't entity's subjective view as what a "societal cost" is.

http://www.abanet.org/publiced/preview/briefs/pdfs/07-08/08-769_Petitioner.pdf

Kagan wrote in US  v. Stevens (2010)

This Court has recognized that some categories of
speech lack First Amendment protection, because the
speech has little or no expressive value and causes serious
societal harms.
Whether a given category of speech enjoys
First Amendment protection depends upon a categorical
balancing of the value of the speech against its societal
costs.

Hence, Kagan as a jurist would rule that there is no free speech regarding Capitalism, because it is a moral evil, and thus can be banned...as well as outlawing free religious speech by Christians and Jews, and anything having to do with the Bible...and I think, would promote Islam as a State forced anti-Christ religion.

In other words, using "animal cruelty", Kagan seeks to open the door of precedent where all Christians and Jews can be silenced, fined, and imprisoned for public acts of faith from verbal expression to a public display of a cross about one's neck, or an "of faith" t-shirt, while advocating and endorsing Muslim proselytizing, symbolism, burka wearing requirements or what have you. The societal costs and free speech protection no longer falls to strict originalist Constitutional language, but to whatever it is "evolved" to say by whomever rules at the time.

Treavor Loudon at New Zeal writes:
"If Elena Kagan is a moderate, why then has she long associated with people connected to three interrelated organizations - the Communist Party USA, the Democratic Socialist Organizing Committee/ Democratic Socialists of America and the far left Washington D.C. think tank, Institute for Policy Studies?

Raised on New Yorks' Upper West Side, Elena Kagan's parents were both politically active in a place and era where politics was dominated by the Democratic, Socialist and Communist parties.

Elena's mother Gloria Kagan campaigned to elect far left Democratic Congressman, William Fitts Ryan. Her older brother Marc Kagan was active in the socialist influenced New Directions movement in the Transport Workers Union. When one of its leaders, Roger Toussaint, was elected union president in 2000, Mr. Kagan became his chief of staff, until a falling out occurred in 2003.

Marc Kagan's former comrade and boss, Roger Toussaint is prominent in the communist initiated Coalition of Black Trade Unionists, which now led by D.S.A. member William Lucy. He also serves in the leadership of the Center for the Study of Working Class Life at Stony Brook University, alongside Ray Markey from the Communist Party offshoot Committees of Correspondence and D.S.A. leaders Gerry Hudson, Mark Levinson, Stanley Aronowitz and Frances Fox Piven, co-originator of the infamous Cloward - Piven Strategy."
--Trevor Loudon, New Zeal

An example of the push of Progressivism toward totalitarianism is from Obama's political career launch party in Chicago, the DSA:

"...wrote Frank Llewellyn, national director of Democratic Socialists of America.

Writing in the latest issue of the socialist Democratic Left magazine, Llewellyn said "progressives" must use Obama's health-care legislation "to build support for the elimination of private insurers."

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=172929

Pamela Gellar reveals that the Jewish Elena Kagan was obsessed with adopting a Communist turned "National Socialist" views as part of hers:

 "Elena Kagan's senior thesis at Princeton University, recounting the history of socialist politics in New York City, cited the theories of an influential German Marxist who notoriously switched allegiances to Nazism after Adolf Hitler attained power.


Werner Sombart was widely recognized as an academic proponent of Marxism and was once praised by Karl Marx's colleague Friedrich Engels as the only German professor who understood Marx's Das Kapital. During World War I, however, Sombart endorsed Germany's "heroic" war against the "capitalist spirit" represented by England. In 1934, Sombart published Deutscher Sozialismus, which advocated the "total ordering of life" as an expression of the German Volksgeist, or "national spirit."


In the introduction to her 1981 thesis, Kagan addresses a question famously asked by Sombart: Warum gibt es in den Vereinigten Staaten keinen Sozialismus? -- "Why is there no socialism in the United States?"


"The Socialist Party of the United States could not lay claim to the kind of pure proletarianism that Sombart considered essential to any socialist movement; indeed, most of the party’s members did not even consider this a worthy goal," Kagan wrote on Page 3 of the thesis. "But the American socialists ‘failure’ to build a movement that even resembled Sombart's idealized notion of a class-conscious party . . . did not render their party any less significant. Nor did such a failure render their party any less successful. In the first two decades of the twentieth century the American socialist movement, whose very existence Sombart refused to consider, grew if not by leaps and bounds at least by inches."


In the final pages of her thesis -- To the Final Conflict: Socialism in New York City, 1900-1933 -- Kagan returns to Sombart's theories, writing: "Why, in particular, did the socialist movement never become an alternative to the nation’s established parties? In answering this question, historians have often called attention to various characteristics of American society that have militated against widespread acceptance of radical movements. These societal traits -- an ethnically divided worked class, a relatively fluid class structure, an economy which allowed at least some workers to enjoy what Sombart termed ‘reefs of roast beef and apple pie,' -- prevented the early twentieth century socialists from attracting an immediate mass following. Such conditions did not, however, completely checkmate American socialism."


Even before he embraced National Socialism, Sombart's socialist theories reflected an anti-Semitic tendency that identified Jews with capitalism, a theme explored in his 1911 book, Die Juden und das Wirtschaftsleben ("The Jews and Economics," which was published in a 1913 English translation titled, The Jews and Modern Capitalism). "   -- Pamela Gellar, Atlasshrugs

 
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2010/07/shocking-kagans-princeton-thesis-cited-german-socialist-who-endorsed-nazis.html



There is a clear reason why modern Progressives do not wish to be transparent on their views...because they wish a totalitarian form of governance of the Communist persuasion.


Who is the Judicial "hero" Kagan would most like to copy and pattern herself after as a Judge, were she ever to become one?

It is an activist Israeli Judge, Aharon Barak, who figures judges need to dynamical alter and change the meaning of the texts of law to fit whatever NEW interpretation they wish to impose upon the text in order to achieve a desired end result, as this linked video shows.




So if we were to ask Kagan about the "Progressive" interpretation of the Law that she is pursuing, and have gotten the honest no-holds barred answer,

we would have ended up with an answer such as "the reinterpretation of law whose end-game is the overthrowing of the Republic of the United States" or "the political isogesis of redefining the US Constitution and all laws until we achieve a totalitarian State modeled after..." ( and then fill in the blank). That is, IF she would have been honest or honestly answered Senator Sessions on her Progressive Legal Re-interpretations on US Law, such as Free Speech as she so wrote to the Supreme Court in US v. Stevens THIS YEAR!!!


Obama Family Origins: A legacy of Hate motivation based on Hussein Obama's Torture by British in Kenya?
The more we ask the questions about who and what Obama is, the more we see the extreme relevance of what a release and examination of the Long Form Birth Certificate is, as well as the following of the Constitution's "Natural Born Citizen" in its originalist interpretation of even having a US Citizen Father instead of an alien national Communist who may or may not have been a Soviet Agent because his father (Barack's grandfather) sought to overthrow the British and got tortured after he was captured. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1091499/Barack-Obamas-grandfather-tortured-British-Kenyas-Mau-Mau-rebellion.html


So if, hypothetically, Barack's grandfather and father associated with Soviet agents in Kenya, and became Communists there...and (hypothetically) his white grandparents did so with Communist agents in the US (possibly from Cuba, and other third world Communists as well possibly those from China)... and (hypothetically) by releasing his birth info, some of that information can be leaked out, such as because of the name of the hospital administrator or physician or location born...why would Barack ever want to release his Long Form birth certificate, stating the hospital and street address he was allegedly born at, especially if it was NOT in the USA?

He would do exactly as he does today. Play the long game, and focus on the Revolution from within the Executive Office, and destroy the Republic of the USA from within, but bit by bit, and through whatever orders and legislation he can get away with while so doing it (so as to avoid an immediate uproar, alledged impeachment, or other what have you).


Barack Hussein Obama, Usurper of the US Presidency with a US Congress and US Supreme Court asleep at the switch, or actively conspiring under the false pride of moral intellectualism, as if it could never happen here, and people in the "real world" just would do that. Really? Then why do we even have a DIA and CIA ? Yikes!

In the meantime, while our intelligence agencies are asleep at the switch, we have a potential past domestic collaborator with foreign agents of those of Communist nations wishing to help subvert and overthrow the US who says to America:

“Being an American is not a matter of blood or birth, it’s a matter of faith.”

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2010/07/01/obama_being_an_american_not_a_matter_of_blood_or_birth.html

A shortened Youtube video snip drops the last 5 words:



Contrary to Obama is the Supreme Court Law, the original intent of the Founding Fathers (regarding what a Natural Born Citizen is), and the history behind it: the history reaching back to the Bible for Nature's Law, and the Greeks (like Plato) for the Law of Nations.


Being an American, therefore, and contrary to Obama, is by a combined action of Nature's Law and the Law of Nations, where by blood being joined to a people by Covenant Oath: when a parent or ancestor is adopted into a national family or the nation of the United States of America, those descendants who follow him, being born by blood or birth, and soil, become Americans through their fathers by blood and by birth in the United States or one of its sovereign territories. The nationality of the child as an American Citizen is not dependent upon their ethnicity, but the Covenant Citizen Relationship of the parent with the United States, the location of birth, the domicility of the child, and the fact that the child is subject to the laws and sovereignty of the United States.



If it were merely a matter of faith and not of blood or birth under the Law, then anyone in the world who runs up a US Flag, and says by faith that they are now American -- without union by blood, birth, soil, and an officially recognized covenant oath with and to the US -- Obama declares as an American?

  So from the Pygmies in Africa, to head-shrinkers living on the Amazon, to active members on the Chinese Communist Parliament or in the Russian spy agencies...anyone who simply says, "by faith, I am an American,"  is so in Obamaworld?  Do we now pay these Social Security welfare checks  and change the rules of who collects the benefits of US taxpayers if they should be unemployed, and having a financial hardship? 

Oh yeah. here we go again with Mr. Hypocrite on transparency, who enables America's enemies, who sticks it to the South's poor by refusing to allow international skimmers to clean the Gulf of Mexico's oil at a greater rate than its gushing, available for months now, and refused...the same one refusing to show proof he was even born on US Soil with an actual hospital or Long Form Birth Certificate, now wants the citizens of the world to what...just say they are Americans by faith, and then he can have Congress justify themselves to pass bills to send our tax dollars to pork projects in Venezuela, Cuba, Kenya, and wherever they "by faith" say they are Americans in their hearts?

If America can't see the importance of such a treasonous and seditious statement as Obama uttered for what it is, then the Communists have won the Second Cold War, and our nuclear destruction by America's Third World enemies is not far behind. Perhaps even to the point where Obama ships them some of our nuclear arsenal, so as to "balance power" in the world under the excuse of making the world safer. Just when you thought such a thought was too incredulous, just give him another year, and it may actually come true. One of the nations perhaps being to his beloved Imams of Iran. And guess which two destinations they will program such missiles to strike? Israel, and the United States of America.

Obama viewed himself in Manhattan, says he in his book "Dreams from my Father"..."like a spy behind enemy lines". If he felt that way about Capitalist Manhattan New York City in the early 1980s...what must he feel like being a usurper in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, D.C.?