Obama is a Half-American who has usurped the Presidency.
Obama was born with half the required US Citizen parentage to be labeled a Natural born citizen.
Obama was abandoned by his foreign national father, unlike the current Brazil v. New Jersey abduction case, and was adopted by another alien national step-father and given an alien citizenship via that adoption. All the while, Obama's identity as he was culturally and familially reared was..."You are only half-american, Barry". His mother, grand-parents, sister...they all would have repeated that line so many times, that it became part of his personality identity as much as it is his legal identity.
Obama's white lineage is US, while his black lineage is foreign born. In Occidental College, Obama chose to pursue his alien/foreign identity, that which derives from his Kenyan national father.
Obama as a University graduate and a lawyer, decided to write a book as to identify himself while in his 30s. He chose to write a book describing that he was pursuing his identity, not as an American, not as a US Citizen, but of an alien national. He chose his father's path...he chose Communism...he chose social action agendas through what
Kenneth Minogue describes as "anarchist ideology", where the Marxist Communists view the people as ever purified as ever the victims and the government is ever the abuser and the enemy.
Obama made his choice. As usurper in chief, he sided with Shia Islam, and told the Islamic world at Cairo he was their willing jacka*s for the coming Mahdi; who in Hadith, will slay all us Christians, and the Jews also, wherever they find us. Obama used the Quran to vow to them, his mission was to enable a new and more complete Final Solution upon the West by enablement, legal and material support.
When abroad, Obama behaves as half-American, ranting about how evil and corrupt the USA is, as a foreigner would; and then apologizes for the US even where we have not done anything wrong. He acts not as if our ambassador, but if an ambassador of some other governing body with lukewarm diplomatic relations with the USA. He represents the US, and behaves as if the half-American he is.
On December 17, 2009, Obama behaved as a 100% usurper, and granted Interpol full immunity to assault and kill US Citizens in their own homes, and any US Law Enforcement that may dare challenge their authority with his AMENDING executive order 12425,
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words “except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act” and the semicolon that immediately precedes them.
BARACK OBAMA
Obama has even effectively authorized Interpol...
The Interpol emblem:
a representation of the globe, olive branches either side of the globe, the name 'INTERPOL' below the globe in the centre of the olive branches
a vertical sword behind the globe, the abbreviations 'OIPC' and 'ICPO' above the globe either side of the sword, scales below the olive branches.
The Interol Flag: has a light-blue background, the emblem is in the centre, the four lightning flashes arranged symmetrically around the emblem represent telecommunications and speed in police action.
...to shoot down his own Secret Service Treasury Agents, and seize him or even a future President for trial and torture in Yemen or Iran (those of the 188 Interpol member countries), and be free from prosecution or retribution by the language in his executive order. Obama is either a truly foudroyant vacuate or an insidious wretch with an anti-American agenda.
I fully expect that True US Patriots and rural local law enforcements, if they see the UN Interpol take on someone as low as a US Citizen neighbor, especially if they be a recent or active US Military veteran home from Iraq or Afghanistan, they will let bullets fly and take out the Interpol invaders from any and every direction possible, rather than submit to tyranny.
According to the Rome Statute on International Criminal Court,
http://untreaty.un.org/cod/icc/statute/romefra.htm
Article 103.1
PART 10. ENFORCEMENT
Article 103
Role of States in enforcement of
sentences of imprisonment
1. (a) A sentence of imprisonment shall be served in a State designated by the Court from a list of States which have indicated to the Court their willingness to accept sentenced persons.
(b) At the time of declaring its willingness to accept sentenced persons, a State may attach conditions to its acceptance as agreed by the Court and in accordance with this Part.
(c) A State designated in a particular case shall promptly inform the Court whether it accepts the Court's designation.
authorizes Interpol to seize and extradite a US Citizen to any nation in its list of 188 member states,
Interpol Member Countries
A Afghanistan | Albania | Algeria | Andorra | Angola | Antigua & Barbuda | Argentina | Armenia | Aruba | Australia | Austria | Azerbaijan
________________________________________
B Bahamas | Bahrain | Bangladesh | Barbados | Belarus | Belgium | Belize | Benin | Bhutan | Bolivia | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Botswana | Brazil | Brunei | Bulgaria | Burkina - Faso | Burundi
________________________________________
C Cambodia | Cameroon | Canada | Cape Verde | Central African Republic | Chad | Chile | China | Colombia | Comoros | Congo | Congo (Democratic Rep.) | Costa Rica | Côte d'Ivoire | Croatia | Cuba | Cyprus | Czech Republic
________________________________________
D Denmark | Djibouti | Dominica | Dominican Republic
________________________________________
E Ecuador | Egypt | El Salvador | Equatorial Guinea | Eritrea | Estonia | Ethiopia
________________________________________
F Fiji | Finland | Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia | France
________________________________________
G Gabon | Gambia | Georgia | Germany | Ghana | Greece | Grenada | Guatemala | Guinea | Guinea Bissau | Guyana
________________________________________
H Haiti | Honduras | Hungary
________________________________________
I Iceland | India | Indonesia | Iran | Iraq | Ireland | Israel | Italy
________________________________________
J Jamaica | Japan | Jordan
________________________________________
K Kazakhstan | Kenya | Korea (Rep. of) |Kuwait | Kyrgyzstan
________________________________________
L Laos | Latvia | Lebanon | Lesotho | Liberia | Libya | Liechtenstein | Lithuania | Luxembourg
________________________________________
M Madagascar | Malawi | Malaysia | Maldives | Mali | Malta | Marshall Islands | Mauritania | Mauritius | Mexico | Moldova | Monaco | Mongolia | Montenegro | Morocco | Mozambique | Myanmar
________________________________________
N Namibia | Nauru | Nepal | Netherlands | Netherlands Antilles | New Zealand | Nicaragua | Niger | Nigeria | Norway
________________________________________
O Oman
________________________________________
P Pakistan | Panama | Papua New Guinea |Paraguay | Peru | Philippines | Poland | Portugal
________________________________________
Q Qatar
________________________________________
R Romania | Russia | Rwanda
________________________________________
S St Kitts & Nevis | St Lucia | St Vincent & the Grenadines | Samoa | San Marino | Sao Tome & Principe | Saudi Arabia | Senegal | Serbia | Seychelles | Sierra Leone | Singapore | Slovakia | Slovenia | Somalia | South Africa | Spain | Sri Lanka | Sudan | Suriname | Swaziland | Sweden | Switzerland | Syria
________________________________________
T Tajikistan | Tanzania | Thailand | Timor - Leste | Togo | Tonga | Trinidad & Tobago | Tunisia | Turkey | Turkmenistan
________________________________________
U Uganda | Ukraine | United Arab Emirates | United Kingdom | United States | Uruguay | Uzbekistan
________________________________________
V Vatican City State | Venezuela | Vietnam
________________________________________
Y Yemen
________________________________________
Z Zambia | Zimbabwe
and need only allow the oversight of the International Court to authorize its legality, conviction and sentencing of the prisoner.
So hypothetically, a hypothetical US Special Forces Capt. Smith comes home from Afghanistan to Texas, is snatched up by Interpol as if by a Swat Team, and is taken to Yemen, where he is tried, convicted and executed for having slaughtered 12 Yemeni nationals who were in Afghanistan as battlefield soldiers...but Yemen declares them as innocent civilians, because they were Muslims, and Capt. Smith is a Catholic infidel. Under Obama's amending Executive Order 12425, Yemen tries, convicts, and beheads the hypothetical Captain Smith, and because the US Supreme Court has not yet overruled Obama, Captain Smith has no rights.
Any member state that has a war fought in it by US soldiers, or a US Citizen merely insults, is subject to a Search and Seizure arrest and extradition by Interpol if that even causeless warrant is issued by the International Courts. That is clearly unlawful and unConstitutional. It is a line that Obama crossed from which there can be no forgiveness. None.
So what do we do? We need to sue Obama over Executive Order 12425, where he declares himself constitutionally eligible. But in order to have legal standing, even a class action by any Joe or Jane Citizen having the sub-joining right to contest Obama, there will first need to be an incident on US soil initiated by Interpol agents executing their warrant, where we see a US Citizen Searched and/or Seized (even extradited) under warrant by Interpol.
The US Constitution enables US Citizens the right to form neighborhood, town, county, and state militias for the sole purpose of repelling these foreign invaders. So if Obama wants to really go there, I say...screw him...let's...and be sure to legally and peacefully do so within the law, while we still have the legal freedom and privileges to do so legally.
From Interpol: 1,2,3.
1) http://www.interpol.int/
"National Central Bureaus (NCB) - Each INTERPOL member country maintains a National Central Bureau staffed by national law enforcement officers. The NCB is the designated contact point for the General Secretariat, regional offices and other member countries requiring assistance with overseas investigations and the location and apprehension of fugitives. "
2) http://www.interpol.int/Public/Terrorism/default.asp
Interpol's mission: "...to support member countries in their efforts to protect their citizens from terrorism, including bio-terrorism; firearms ...."
3) http://www.interpol.int/Public/ICPO/FactSheets/PST04.pdf
Firearms
"A threat to the safety of citizens in any country, firearms also pose a wider threat to security, peace, stability and development. Firearms are easy to conceal and transport, and offer lucrative profits to criminals trafficking in illicit small arms and light weapons."
---------------------------------------------
My comments to the above from Interpol:
1) The framework is an international Interpol immunity, staffed with nationals who are able to call in alien nationals of any member country for assistance or the carrying out of an assignment.
In County Law Enforcement in the USA, we have the rule of "Posse Commitatus" or "Power of the County", where a Law Enforcement Officer can immediately deputize any able bodied and non-felony-convicted male over the age of 18 to effect an imminent arrest. In the framework of Interpol with its limited budget, it has the power to deputize whole brigades and call that invasion a "Police Action", like we did so call Korea back in 1951. For us, we might have US citizen militias chased about the countryside like Pancho Villa by Pershing...without the US citizen militias being any more guilty than legal gun ownership and flying too many US Flags to be politically correct, and guilty of no violations of US Law whatsoever. Maybe someone totally unaffiliated on the other side of the Country urinates on another nation's flag, or this or that book, it get put up on Youtube or wherever, and that's all it will take. The choosing of the Interpol victims need no actual justification or true legal cause, thanks to Obama.
The framework as it stands now, with Obama banning the USA's right to challenge and inquire or even tax Interpol, will now allow Interpol USA employees to act as data collectors spying on its own citizens (against their own nation) on the behalf of the foreign power(s) they will be employed by. China can now use Interpol to legally steal nuclear and national defense secrets, and have full immunity if they use Interpol employees to espionage in the US. They also have the authority to arrest and kidnap key scientists, experts, and any person they so desire. The Interpol USA, hampered by manpower and budget, can now (via Obama) have that foreign power willing to front its costs, supply the man-power with a local national point man or point team to execute the warrant, and the full authority to call anyone they want as a fugitive, and shoot anyone attempting to interfere with their warrant. Interpol will now further be protected by the International Criminal Courts, that Obama wants to subject our US Constitution to, so that he can junk it.
When that occurs, and Obama and Harold Koh are actively pushing to junk the Constitution to the winds and whims of International Law, every lawyer in the US will need the books at this provided link for required reading...and most of us will be required to know what we now "must do" to serve the Foreign Oligarchy that will reign as the top legates of the Land.
http://www.us.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Law/PublicInternationalLaw/GeneralPublicInternationalLaw/?view=usa&ci=9780199545278
Under Obama, Interpol now no longer needs to show the Department of Justice, the F.B.I., or anybody else any probable cause, because that information is now privileged via Obama's Amending the Interpol Executive Order on 12/17/09. They can just hold up a piece of paper that merely looks like a warrant, and our law enforcement has no right to stop them to verify even what it says...so that their power is limited to their tenacity and manpower to overcome whatever resistance there might be, if any.
2) and 3) Interpol's own factsheet says that anyone who even owns a gun, outside of Law Enforcement, is a potential terrorist...and is fair game for arrest on the mere fact of gun ownership, everywhere in the world...including the US.
The State Attorney Generals have the right to sue for clarification from the US Supreme Court using an Emergency Injunction resisting obeisance to the Executive Order Amendment -- in order that the Courts might clarify specifically what damage has or has not been done, and to verify that the individual States can deny obeisance (i.e., opt out) of that Amended Interpol Executive Order. I believe the opt out option may actually work, and if 36 states opt out, it super-majority becomes the reversal of Obama's executive order, just as if 36 State Legislatures voted to over-ride Congress. I know of no precedent to confirm this, and no law as yet to deny such a scenario or application from being successful. But as yet, it is merely theoretical application that should be examined and pursued if possible.
Obama was born with half the required US Citizen parentage to be labeled a Natural born citizen.
Obama was abandoned by his foreign national father, unlike the current Brazil v. New Jersey abduction case, and was adopted by another alien national step-father and given an alien citizenship via that adoption. All the while, Obama's identity as he was culturally and familially reared was..."You are only half-american, Barry". His mother, grand-parents, sister...they all would have repeated that line so many times, that it became part of his personality identity as much as it is his legal identity.
Obama's white lineage is US, while his black lineage is foreign born. In Occidental College, Obama chose to pursue his alien/foreign identity, that which derives from his Kenyan national father.
Obama as a University graduate and a lawyer, decided to write a book as to identify himself while in his 30s. He chose to write a book describing that he was pursuing his identity, not as an American, not as a US Citizen, but of an alien national. He chose his father's path...he chose Communism...he chose social action agendas through what
Kenneth Minogue describes as "anarchist ideology", where the Marxist Communists view the people as ever purified as ever the victims and the government is ever the abuser and the enemy.
Obama made his choice. As usurper in chief, he sided with Shia Islam, and told the Islamic world at Cairo he was their willing jacka*s for the coming Mahdi; who in Hadith, will slay all us Christians, and the Jews also, wherever they find us. Obama used the Quran to vow to them, his mission was to enable a new and more complete Final Solution upon the West by enablement, legal and material support.
When abroad, Obama behaves as half-American, ranting about how evil and corrupt the USA is, as a foreigner would; and then apologizes for the US even where we have not done anything wrong. He acts not as if our ambassador, but if an ambassador of some other governing body with lukewarm diplomatic relations with the USA. He represents the US, and behaves as if the half-American he is.
On December 17, 2009, Obama behaved as a 100% usurper, and granted Interpol full immunity to assault and kill US Citizens in their own homes, and any US Law Enforcement that may dare challenge their authority with his AMENDING executive order 12425,
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 1 of the International Organizations Immunities Act (22 U.S.C. 288), and in order to extend the appropriate privileges, exemptions, and immunities to the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL), it is hereby ordered that Executive Order 12425 of June 16, 1983, as amended, is further amended by deleting from the first sentence the words “except those provided by Section 2(c), Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, and Section 6 of that Act” and the semicolon that immediately precedes them.
BARACK OBAMA
Obama has even effectively authorized Interpol...
The Interpol emblem:
a representation of the globe, olive branches either side of the globe, the name 'INTERPOL' below the globe in the centre of the olive branches
a vertical sword behind the globe, the abbreviations 'OIPC' and 'ICPO' above the globe either side of the sword, scales below the olive branches.
The Interol Flag: has a light-blue background, the emblem is in the centre, the four lightning flashes arranged symmetrically around the emblem represent telecommunications and speed in police action.
...to shoot down his own Secret Service Treasury Agents, and seize him or even a future President for trial and torture in Yemen or Iran (those of the 188 Interpol member countries), and be free from prosecution or retribution by the language in his executive order. Obama is either a truly foudroyant vacuate or an insidious wretch with an anti-American agenda.
I fully expect that True US Patriots and rural local law enforcements, if they see the UN Interpol take on someone as low as a US Citizen neighbor, especially if they be a recent or active US Military veteran home from Iraq or Afghanistan, they will let bullets fly and take out the Interpol invaders from any and every direction possible, rather than submit to tyranny.
According to the Rome Statute on International Criminal Court,
http://untreaty.un.org/cod/icc/statute/romefra.htm
Article 103.1
PART 10. ENFORCEMENT
Article 103
Role of States in enforcement of
sentences of imprisonment
1. (a) A sentence of imprisonment shall be served in a State designated by the Court from a list of States which have indicated to the Court their willingness to accept sentenced persons.
(b) At the time of declaring its willingness to accept sentenced persons, a State may attach conditions to its acceptance as agreed by the Court and in accordance with this Part.
(c) A State designated in a particular case shall promptly inform the Court whether it accepts the Court's designation.
authorizes Interpol to seize and extradite a US Citizen to any nation in its list of 188 member states,
Interpol Member Countries
A Afghanistan | Albania | Algeria | Andorra | Angola | Antigua & Barbuda | Argentina | Armenia | Aruba | Australia | Austria | Azerbaijan
________________________________________
B Bahamas | Bahrain | Bangladesh | Barbados | Belarus | Belgium | Belize | Benin | Bhutan | Bolivia | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Botswana | Brazil | Brunei | Bulgaria | Burkina - Faso | Burundi
________________________________________
C Cambodia | Cameroon | Canada | Cape Verde | Central African Republic | Chad | Chile | China | Colombia | Comoros | Congo | Congo (Democratic Rep.) | Costa Rica | Côte d'Ivoire | Croatia | Cuba | Cyprus | Czech Republic
________________________________________
D Denmark | Djibouti | Dominica | Dominican Republic
________________________________________
E Ecuador | Egypt | El Salvador | Equatorial Guinea | Eritrea | Estonia | Ethiopia
________________________________________
F Fiji | Finland | Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia | France
________________________________________
G Gabon | Gambia | Georgia | Germany | Ghana | Greece | Grenada | Guatemala | Guinea | Guinea Bissau | Guyana
________________________________________
H Haiti | Honduras | Hungary
________________________________________
I Iceland | India | Indonesia | Iran | Iraq | Ireland | Israel | Italy
________________________________________
J Jamaica | Japan | Jordan
________________________________________
K Kazakhstan | Kenya | Korea (Rep. of) |Kuwait | Kyrgyzstan
________________________________________
L Laos | Latvia | Lebanon | Lesotho | Liberia | Libya | Liechtenstein | Lithuania | Luxembourg
________________________________________
M Madagascar | Malawi | Malaysia | Maldives | Mali | Malta | Marshall Islands | Mauritania | Mauritius | Mexico | Moldova | Monaco | Mongolia | Montenegro | Morocco | Mozambique | Myanmar
________________________________________
N Namibia | Nauru | Nepal | Netherlands | Netherlands Antilles | New Zealand | Nicaragua | Niger | Nigeria | Norway
________________________________________
O Oman
________________________________________
P Pakistan | Panama | Papua New Guinea |Paraguay | Peru | Philippines | Poland | Portugal
________________________________________
Q Qatar
________________________________________
R Romania | Russia | Rwanda
________________________________________
S St Kitts & Nevis | St Lucia | St Vincent & the Grenadines | Samoa | San Marino | Sao Tome & Principe | Saudi Arabia | Senegal | Serbia | Seychelles | Sierra Leone | Singapore | Slovakia | Slovenia | Somalia | South Africa | Spain | Sri Lanka | Sudan | Suriname | Swaziland | Sweden | Switzerland | Syria
________________________________________
T Tajikistan | Tanzania | Thailand | Timor - Leste | Togo | Tonga | Trinidad & Tobago | Tunisia | Turkey | Turkmenistan
________________________________________
U Uganda | Ukraine | United Arab Emirates | United Kingdom | United States | Uruguay | Uzbekistan
________________________________________
V Vatican City State | Venezuela | Vietnam
________________________________________
Y Yemen
________________________________________
Z Zambia | Zimbabwe
and need only allow the oversight of the International Court to authorize its legality, conviction and sentencing of the prisoner.
So hypothetically, a hypothetical US Special Forces Capt. Smith comes home from Afghanistan to Texas, is snatched up by Interpol as if by a Swat Team, and is taken to Yemen, where he is tried, convicted and executed for having slaughtered 12 Yemeni nationals who were in Afghanistan as battlefield soldiers...but Yemen declares them as innocent civilians, because they were Muslims, and Capt. Smith is a Catholic infidel. Under Obama's amending Executive Order 12425, Yemen tries, convicts, and beheads the hypothetical Captain Smith, and because the US Supreme Court has not yet overruled Obama, Captain Smith has no rights.
Any member state that has a war fought in it by US soldiers, or a US Citizen merely insults, is subject to a Search and Seizure arrest and extradition by Interpol if that even causeless warrant is issued by the International Courts. That is clearly unlawful and unConstitutional. It is a line that Obama crossed from which there can be no forgiveness. None.
So what do we do? We need to sue Obama over Executive Order 12425, where he declares himself constitutionally eligible. But in order to have legal standing, even a class action by any Joe or Jane Citizen having the sub-joining right to contest Obama, there will first need to be an incident on US soil initiated by Interpol agents executing their warrant, where we see a US Citizen Searched and/or Seized (even extradited) under warrant by Interpol.
The US Constitution enables US Citizens the right to form neighborhood, town, county, and state militias for the sole purpose of repelling these foreign invaders. So if Obama wants to really go there, I say...screw him...let's...and be sure to legally and peacefully do so within the law, while we still have the legal freedom and privileges to do so legally.
From Interpol: 1,2,3.
1) http://www.interpol.int/
"National Central Bureaus (NCB) - Each INTERPOL member country maintains a National Central Bureau staffed by national law enforcement officers. The NCB is the designated contact point for the General Secretariat, regional offices and other member countries requiring assistance with overseas investigations and the location and apprehension of fugitives. "
2) http://www.interpol.int/Public/Terrorism/default.asp
Interpol's mission: "...to support member countries in their efforts to protect their citizens from terrorism, including bio-terrorism; firearms ...."
3) http://www.interpol.int/Public/ICPO/FactSheets/PST04.pdf
Firearms
"A threat to the safety of citizens in any country, firearms also pose a wider threat to security, peace, stability and development. Firearms are easy to conceal and transport, and offer lucrative profits to criminals trafficking in illicit small arms and light weapons."
---------------------------------------------
My comments to the above from Interpol:
1) The framework is an international Interpol immunity, staffed with nationals who are able to call in alien nationals of any member country for assistance or the carrying out of an assignment.
In County Law Enforcement in the USA, we have the rule of "Posse Commitatus" or "Power of the County", where a Law Enforcement Officer can immediately deputize any able bodied and non-felony-convicted male over the age of 18 to effect an imminent arrest. In the framework of Interpol with its limited budget, it has the power to deputize whole brigades and call that invasion a "Police Action", like we did so call Korea back in 1951. For us, we might have US citizen militias chased about the countryside like Pancho Villa by Pershing...without the US citizen militias being any more guilty than legal gun ownership and flying too many US Flags to be politically correct, and guilty of no violations of US Law whatsoever. Maybe someone totally unaffiliated on the other side of the Country urinates on another nation's flag, or this or that book, it get put up on Youtube or wherever, and that's all it will take. The choosing of the Interpol victims need no actual justification or true legal cause, thanks to Obama.
The framework as it stands now, with Obama banning the USA's right to challenge and inquire or even tax Interpol, will now allow Interpol USA employees to act as data collectors spying on its own citizens (against their own nation) on the behalf of the foreign power(s) they will be employed by. China can now use Interpol to legally steal nuclear and national defense secrets, and have full immunity if they use Interpol employees to espionage in the US. They also have the authority to arrest and kidnap key scientists, experts, and any person they so desire. The Interpol USA, hampered by manpower and budget, can now (via Obama) have that foreign power willing to front its costs, supply the man-power with a local national point man or point team to execute the warrant, and the full authority to call anyone they want as a fugitive, and shoot anyone attempting to interfere with their warrant. Interpol will now further be protected by the International Criminal Courts, that Obama wants to subject our US Constitution to, so that he can junk it.
When that occurs, and Obama and Harold Koh are actively pushing to junk the Constitution to the winds and whims of International Law, every lawyer in the US will need the books at this provided link for required reading...and most of us will be required to know what we now "must do" to serve the Foreign Oligarchy that will reign as the top legates of the Land.
http://www.us.oup.com/us/catalog/general/subject/Law/PublicInternationalLaw/GeneralPublicInternationalLaw/?view=usa&ci=9780199545278
Under Obama, Interpol now no longer needs to show the Department of Justice, the F.B.I., or anybody else any probable cause, because that information is now privileged via Obama's Amending the Interpol Executive Order on 12/17/09. They can just hold up a piece of paper that merely looks like a warrant, and our law enforcement has no right to stop them to verify even what it says...so that their power is limited to their tenacity and manpower to overcome whatever resistance there might be, if any.
2) and 3) Interpol's own factsheet says that anyone who even owns a gun, outside of Law Enforcement, is a potential terrorist...and is fair game for arrest on the mere fact of gun ownership, everywhere in the world...including the US.
The State Attorney Generals have the right to sue for clarification from the US Supreme Court using an Emergency Injunction resisting obeisance to the Executive Order Amendment -- in order that the Courts might clarify specifically what damage has or has not been done, and to verify that the individual States can deny obeisance (i.e., opt out) of that Amended Interpol Executive Order. I believe the opt out option may actually work, and if 36 states opt out, it super-majority becomes the reversal of Obama's executive order, just as if 36 State Legislatures voted to over-ride Congress. I know of no precedent to confirm this, and no law as yet to deny such a scenario or application from being successful. But as yet, it is merely theoretical application that should be examined and pursued if possible.
Ann is legally incorrect in defining what Natural Born means under both Common and US Law.
ReplyDeleteThe Act of May 25, 1934 moved the Natural Born Status of a child from being paternally only passed to being both paternally and maternally passed. That act remained predominent well beyond the 1970s, as evidenced by the language of all those US Supreme Court rulings that were addressing "natural born citizen" from 1934 to those times. It is the law that was in effect in 1961 that matters, as well as Obama fell between the cracks in Kenyan Law, and even without an oath of allegiance to Kenya, by being born in 1961 instead of 1962, he is a Kenyan/British dual commonwealth citizen by paternally passed right. That issue, attorney Mario Apuzzo addresses in his articles, linked as: http://puzo1.blogspot.com/
A hypothetical June or July 1960 born child fathered by Nikita Krushchev
http://www.ena.lu/visit-nikita-kruschev-united-states-15-september-1959-020703300.html
with an American Citizen 18 year old girl will not make her child a natural born citizen of the United States, it would simply be an anchor baby with the same privileges afforded a foreign citizen who has spent 14 years naturalizing from his foreign country in the USA, and taken the oath of allegience. That hypothetical anchor baby fathered by a foreign national, has NO rights to ever run or be elected to the presidency. Obama is an anchor baby, NOT a 100% allegiance to the USA through both parents baby, which is the de facto definition of the "natural born status" in 1961 when he was allegedly born. That is Case Law, and is something for the Courts to settle once the obstructions are cleared. Regardless of the Birth Certificate issue, which only the determined to be deceived can trust (just like Climategate proves about people intentionally lying and manipulating), so also the Supreme Court needs to hear and rule on this issue of the Obama and McCain deception in the 2008 election to run 2 unqualified major party Presidential candidates: one by parentage (Obama), and one by birth location outside US Territorial Boundaries (McCain).
Corruption and the open violation of the Constitution occurred by both major parties, and there should be equal prosecution under US Law against Obama (firstly) and McCain (secondly), and those who signed off on their legality to run (Pelosi signed off on Obama, and should also be removed from office and prosecuted with Obama and McCain for Constitutionally defined High Crimes and Misdemeanors).
Essential reading for those who blindly accept Obama as qualified will include:
http://puzo1.blogspot.com/ (cited above)
http://www.therightsideoflife.com/2009/06/03/obamas-presidential-eligibility-what-you-need-to-know/
and the reader to ask themselves, why they can trust entire Campaign office that knowingly put forth a forgery:
http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/07/atlas-exclusive.html
P.S., In the hypothetical on Krushchev, it is on condition that we are dealing with child abandonment, where neither he nor the Soviet Union claim the hypothetical child, and the child decides to run for President later in life. The use of a hypothetical foreign tourist of any non-treaty and non-diplomatic status would have been legally perfect to use, and the child still would hold a non-100% legience through parentage, as is expected only of the Natural Born. I apologize for the quick off the cuff response using a not fully appropriate example in the sense of being a perfect 100% correct example, instead of an almost (but not really) hyperbole shock value example. I apologize for that.
ReplyDeleteSee also the Constitutonal terms:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/11737124/Citizenship-Terms-Used-in-the-US-Constitution-The-5-Terms-Defined-Some-Legal-Reference-to-Same
A US "Native born" in the legal rulings to 1934 was sometimes contradictory or vague in its definition or intent. Generally, the child appeared only to have needed only to be born on US Soil to be called "native", regardless of the parentage or citizen status...but it was not necessarily synonymous with "natural born".
ReplyDeleteA "natural born" was born by natural citizens -- the father at least having voting rights -- (this alone excludes Obama Sr. and hence his son) of the natural country in which they dwelled.
At such a time that the parents had attained or thereafter maintained natural status to be its nations citizens owing it sole legience, their child who is natural born on the soil of their natural nation's lands (or territories) is declared upon birth and registry as "natural born citizens".
If the mother owes legience to one nation, and the father owes foreign legience of any kind, the birth is unnatural in the legal sense after 05/25/1934 to well after any relevant period regarding the birth of Barack Obama II.
Whereas before May 25, 1934 backwards to even in the days of Vattel, a Barack Obama II birth would naturally be ruled as Kenyan regardless where in the world he was born (because "natural born" follows the seed from which the child grew, not the flesh it was plowed into and grown from / the mother).
In the case of Kenya, those lands which Barack would owe natural born status to from Vattel's time to 1961, would by Nature (paternal family) be those tribal lands that border southeastern Lake Victoria (if applied currently to Vattel's time and laws of nations), and Obama's nationality would then merely be a tribal location in the Safari lands of Eastern continental Africa. That would be his nationality in the times of Vattel. No real difference or change geographically.
If this is what the Eastern Standard meant in June 2004's headlines of Senator Barack being "Kenyan born", following their laws, Vattel, and the citizen lineage of his father...then Obama is still legally disqualified according to the nation of Kenya, who have no Treaty with the US to relinquish NBC status, nor do they recognize dual citizenship with the US. The Act of May 25, 1934 adds the subsequent requirement of a US Citizen mother to make the child "US natural born", but you take away the father and clearly misconstrue what the law clearly says.
For the first 21 years of his life, (even factcheck.org now admits the first 23 years of his life) Barack Obama held Kenyan citizenship in the legal eyes of the nation of Kenya...and that alone, legally disqualifies Barack from attaining the Presidency of the United Staes legally, no matter where he resided in those first 21 or 23 years of his life. By having kept a Kenyan citizenship past the age of 21 in the United States, and the Left's Obama worshippers confessing this, violates US Code, and forever disqualifies Obama from being labeled anything other than an anchor baby via his mother, and a KENYAN Natural Born Citizen through his father, even if Obama abandons his paternal birthright.
The legality of these issues may soon be allowed to be brought to the DC Circuit Courts under Orly Taitz. On January 20, 2010, Judge Carter in Santa Ana CA will likely accept both the Government's contention and Orly Taitz's motion that Obama's eligibility issue be tried in the DC Circuit on its merits.
ReplyDeleteSenator Graham, who sits on the Senate Judiciary Committee is as incompetent on this issue as Senator Feinstein is on what in the Constitution grants her the right to force us to all pay egregious Healthcare payments. She cited the right of Congress to tax and the right of Congress to regulate Commerce. Senator Graham campaigned extensively for an illegal candidate of John McCain, because McCain was born hundreds of yards outside the territory controlled by the United States, in Panama's sovereignty. As a conservative Republican, I view Senator Graham as a traitor to the Constitution of the United States. As for Orrin Hatch, he is legally inferring to post 1986 (even post 2000) legislation introduced or that was argued over previously. Senator Hatch is certainly not making a legal opinion on pre-1986, especially 1961, laws. You are mistaken to take him so out of legal context, SMR.
Until the Act of May 25, 1934, the plain sense meaning of a US NBC was chiefly dependant on the citizenship of the Father, or the presumption thereof (in the case of birth illegitimacy); in order that his "seed" be legally recognized as born jus soli and jus sanguinis. Obama Sr.'s seed was a Kenyan national's.
Further, I have posted both video and reading aids to this issue back on December 25, 2009. The Chester A. Arthur question is addressed by lawyer Leo Donofrio on the linked radio program. The NBC requiring two citizen parents.
ReplyDeleteOn another video link, actually on 2 of them, the very likely fake birth numbers of Obama's Birth Certificate twice refuted by the later birthed Nordyke twins from the now claimed by Obama same K hospital is addressed: the twins born the day after Obama's alleged birthday but having earlier Long Form Birth Certificate numbers than Barack's short foreign "birth certification" copy. Etc.
And for those finally having the epiphany and receiving the light,instead of being lost in the darkness of the Obama Deception... an entertaining number from Amy Grant from Youtube, 1974, was also then added on the 12/25/209 blog video and google books entry.