A Video Education On The Constitution by Publius Huldah

" [The Constitution] [o]wing its ratification to the law of a State, it has been contended that the same authority might repeal the law by which it was ratified.      ... The possibility of a question of this nature proves the necessity of laying the foundations of our national government deeper than in the mere sanction of delegated authority. The fabric of American empire ought to rest on the solid basis of THE CONSENT OF THE PEOPLE. The streams of national power ought to flow immediately from that pure, original fountain of all legitimate authority."    
Friday, December 14, 1787,
Alexander Hamilton, 
Federalist Papers # 22
http://www.foundingfathers.info/federalistpapers/fed22.htm

Publius Huldah describes herself in this way: 
"Lawyer, philosopher & logician.  Strict constructionist of the U.S. Constitution.  Passionate about The Federalist  Papers (Alexander Hamilton, James Madison & John Jay), restoring constitutional government...."         https://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/

She is well worth listening to and reading in regard to the Constitution, and I am telling you, as a well informed kind of  U.S. Constitution literal constructionist that America needs right now against the latest Marxist-Leninist plot by Obama and his fellow traitors (in and outside the branches of Federal Government) who are trying to trick Americans into dissolving the Constitution themselves with a Plan B if their Plan A of out and out dissolving it by "mere declaration it is dissolved" does not work. It is also my own personal view and strong belief that radio personality Mark Levin, to me, is a pseudo-conservative and a traitor who long ago abandoned the Constitution for his new best friend forever (bff) who he will defend as Constitutional when Obama is clearly and absolutely an illegal to the POTUS (not having unity of one allegiance to the U.S. at birth with a U.S. Citizen father, etc.) and a usurper, et cetera, the same man Barack Hussein Obama II, who in my presence in 1981 most definitely and absolutely identified himself as "a Marxist-Leninist".   

Any attempt at an Article V Convention must be quashed BEFORE it happens if we are to prevent this method from those in 3 Federal Branches of Government in Washington D.C., from giving us a Communist Constitution replacement and a tyranny dissolving all rights, over-taxing, and requiring genociding Christians, Conservatives, Veterans, and those they have already declared as their enemies as they side with Al Qaeda over those citizens they are supposed to represent in THIS nation.  As Congressmen and women engage in gay sex, pedophilia, black-mail, and what have you, they have NO interest in doing their jobs to follow the Constitution anymore, as this nation is now running on auto-pilot while an oligarchy of unelected leaders decide what to do next without inciting a few million citizens to march on D.C. and take it over and do what needs to be done.  That is where we are at historically.    Or so it seems in my opinion.  That's my Input, anyway.  -- Brianroy




https://youtu.be/ssmC5EUy-zA






https://youtu.be/oQNmXKlpvVM



https://publiushuldah.files.wordpress.com/2013/08/chart-showing-federal-structure-3-1-part-a2.pdf



https://youtu.be/nM6bI7wMyBc




https://youtu.be/sB0vP1ulUcA





I also include a recent weekly supplemental comment by the John Birch Society

https://youtu.be/QzyWl_0eTB4

Delegates to an Article V Convention Can’t be Controlled by State Laws!

By Publius Huldah

Our Declaration of Independence (2^nd para) sets forth our long forgotten Founding Principles that:

♦  All men are created equal.

♦  Rights come from God.

♦  People create governments to secure God-given rights. The first three words of our Constitution throw off the European model where political power originates with the State; and establish the new Principle that WE THE PEOPLE are the “pure, original fountain of all legitimate political authority” (Federalist No. 22, last sentence).

♦  When a government seeks to take away our God given rights, we have the right to alter, abolish, or throw off that Form of government.

These are the Principles which justified our Revolution against a King.

These are also the Principles which permit us today to throw off our Form of government by discarding our existing Constitution and replacing it with another one. This is why the language at Article V of our Constitution, which authorizes Congress to call a convention “for proposing amendments”, does not restrict Delegates to merely “proposing amendments”: Delegates are invested with that inherent pre-existing sovereign right, recognized in our Declaration, to abolish our existing Form of government (our Constitution) and propose a new Constitution.

This has happened once before in our Country. I’ll show you.

The Federal Convention of 1787: Federal and State Instructions to Delegates

Pursuant to Article XIII of The Articles of Confederation (our first Constitution), the Continental Congress resolved on February 21, 1787 (p 71-74) to call a convention to be held at Philadelphia:

“for the sole and express purpose of revising the Articles of Confederation”.

The Continental Congress authorized each of the then 13 States to appoint Delegates to the convention. Twelve of the States ¹ made laws respecting the appointment of Delegates and issuing instructions to Delegates. Ten States instructed their Delegates to propose alterations to the Articles of Confederation; and only two (North Carolina and New Hampshire) gave instructions which arguably permitted their Delegates to do more than propose alterations to the Articles of Confederation. ²

But the Delegates ignored the federal and State limitations and wrote a new Constitution (the one we have now is our second Constitution).  Because of this inherent authority of Delegates, it is impossible to stop it from happening at a convention today (which will surely result in a third Constitution).

The Delegates to the 1787 convention also instituted an easier mode of ratification. Whereas Article XIII of the Articles of Confederation required approval of all of the then 13 States before an amendment could be ratified; Article VII of the new Constitution provided that only 9 States were required for ratification of the new Constitution.

 Why is an Article V Convention Dangerous?

So! Do you see?

If we have a convention today, there is nothing to stop Delegates from proposing a third Constitution with its own new method of ratification.

New Constitutions are already prepared and waiting for a convention. Here are three:

♦  Fifty years ago, the Ford & Rockefeller Foundations produced the Constitution for the Newstates of America. It is ratified by a referendum called by the President [Art 12, Sec. 1]. If we have a convention, and Delegates propose the Newstates Constitution, it doesn’t go to the States for ratification – it goes directly to the President to call a Referendum. The States are dissolved and replaced by regional governments answerable to the new national government. Read the Newstates Constitution and tremble for your country.

♦ The Revolutionary Communist Party, USA has a Constitution for The New Socialist Republic in North America.

♦ The Constitution 2020 movement is funded by George Soros and supported by Marxist law professors and Marxist groups all over the Country, Cass Sunstein and Eric Holder. They want a Marxist Constitution and they want it in place by the year 2020. It further appears that Soros is funding much of the current push for an Article V convention.

Warnings from the Wise

Brilliant men have warned against an Article V convention. It is immoral to dismiss their warnings:

♦  Alexander Hamilton writes of “the utter improbability of assembling a new convention, under circumstances in any degree so favorable to a happy issue, as those in which the late convention met, deliberated, and concluded…”  Federalist No. 85 (9^th para)

♦  James Madison writes in his Nov. 2, 1788 letter to Turberville that he “trembled” at the prospect of a second convention; and that an Article V Convention would give “the most violent partizans” and “individuals of insidious views” “a dangerous opportunity of sapping the very foundations of the fabric” of our Country. InFederalist No. 49, he shows that the convention method is NOT GOOD to correct breaches of the federal constitution because the People aren’t philosophers – they follow what influential people tell them! And the very legislators who caused the problem would get themselves seats at the convention so they could control the outcome.

♦  Former US Supreme Court Justice Arthur Goldberg reminds us in his Sep. 14, 1986 article in The Miami Herald, that at the convention of 1787, the delegates ignored their instructions from the Continental Congress and instead of proposing amendments to the Articles of Confederation, wrote a new Constitution.He warns that “…any attempt at limiting the agenda [of the convention] would almost certainly be unenforceable.”

♦  Former US Supreme Court Chief Justice Warren Berger warns in his June 1988 letter to Phyllis Schlafly that “there is no effective way to limit or muzzle the actions of a Constitutional Convention”; “After a Convention is convened, it will be too late to stop the Convention if we don’t like its agenda”; and “A new Convention could plunge our Nation into constitutional confusion and confrontation at every turn…”

Read MORE at: https://publiushuldah.wordpress.com/2015/02/01/delegates-to-an-article-v-convention-cant-be-controlled-by-state-laws/