ABC and Jake Tapper running scared after revealing Kenya still views or at least infers Barack Hussein Obama II has a still current (though inactive) Kenyan Citizenship

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2010/11/odd-little-moment-at-the-ceo-meeting/comments/page/1/#comments

"There was an odd little moment with Spice Jet founder Bhupendra Kansagra when President Obama spoke to CEOs Saturday in Mumbai.


MR. KANSAGRA: Thank you. Welcome, Mr. President, to India. As a fellow Kenyan, I’m very proud to see that you have made --



THE PRESIDENT: Made something of myself. (Laughter.)"



ABC Liberals can't handle facts that rattle their make-believe utopian liberal worlds. I posted specific quotes with specific sources and links (including two US Supreme Court cases where at "333 US 640 @ 653, and 533 US 53 @ 54 and 62, Obama was obligated to prove via 'hospital records and witnesses to the birth' he was even born in the US, which he has not.") on Nov 7, 2010 11:56:26 PM, November 08, 2010 at 05:21 AM, at the ABC article, but the censors must have wet their pants and removed it.




A few hours ago, I posted a more tame version that was also censored, stating:

'When the Kenyan Government says Obama was born there, and not in the US:


"...how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the President of America?
p. 31, NATIONAL ASSEMBLY OFFICIAL REPORT


Thursday, 25th March, 2010… 2.30 p.m.",


how can you argue that they do not see Obama as both a native son, whom they officially state was born in Kenyan Government Transcripts while arguing Government business, (in both 2010 and in 2009) and NOW in the above mentioned comment by Mr. Kasangra – “As a fellow Kenyan, I’m very proud to see that you have made –“ as Kenya officially still looking upon Barack as still a Kenyan citizen with an inactive but available anytime he wishes to use it, Kenyan citizenship?


You, Jake, and ABC, have yet to explain away multiple Kenyan Media boasts that the Obama – the Obama we have usurping the US Presidency – was declared nationally by them to be born in Kenya from 2004 ff. The Eastern Standard of Nairobi on June 27, 2004 led with the headline "Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate" and repeated that "Kenyan-born" assertion as fact, when the lead sentence stated that "Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations."


Kenya’s Government officials and Kenya’s own media (since at least 2004) have claimed Barack was born in Kenya. So are you going to call the nation of Kenya “birthers” now, and still blow it off that you, ABC, and the rest of the Media have conspired to subvert the US Constitution by intentional neglect of those provisions you personally don’t like, regardless of what the Law is?'

ONLY TO HAVE THAT REMOVED BY ABC's CENSORS AS WELL. 

So my question is, why are the Liberal Media running scared and so afraid to discuss what the Kenyan Media, and the Kenyan Government states as if factual...not to mention the points of law, and what is or is not Constitutional regarding the Natural Born Citizen clause of the US Constitution? Because I believe they in the Mainstream Media, ABC News included, are willingly, by their words and actions, actively and zealously conspiring to keep an alien "usurper" in office.

To me, it appears they base this ideology of rationalizing an unConstitutional President and Usurper on three general formulas:
1. They ideologically can no longer discern between Democratic and Democratic Republic to such an extent, that they either illiterately or knowingly advocate and perpetuate Communist-Socialist agitator arguments and agendas that are meant to "soft-overthrow the US Constitution", while being presented in a fantasic utopian presentation as if a unique and emerging Americanized form of Communism that they obviously (or at least in appearance) seem to hope will work;
2.The obsessive need of theirs to be color-prejudiced, whereby via the special mental retardization syndrome takes over, and they insanely demand that Barack's skin color demands blind obedience and acceptance, a call for lawlessness applied in such a way, that their is a peer pressured forbidding of judging actions and words (good or bad) that has existed for so long (the last 3 1/2 years), that perpetuating that blind obedience and worship based on skin color still somehow equals enlightenment.  Even the Communists and Socialists outside the Media are breaking that rule now...so why doesn't the Media?
3.  As long as Barack Obama wears the name "Democrat", regardless if he is simultaneously a Democrat of the Democratic National Committee, the Democratic Socialists of America, and even were he called a "Democratic Communist" out of his own mouth...as long as he uses the word "Democrat", he is to be "untouchable", and kept in office at all costs. 

The die-hard leftists in the Media suppressing the Law based on a prostituting of their alleged "watch dog" media status.  How pathetic!
 
That's my editorial, and my input.