Bill Still gives BREAKING NEWS on the Seth Rich Murder
Bill Still lists the following on the Emergency Room 4th year Resident:
Synopsis: This is an anonymous source alert – and at least that’s more than either the Wash Post or the NYT has given you.
A person on something called Boardnet – and within Boardnet, on something called - /pol/ - posted the following last Wednesday, May 17.
“[I am a] 4th-year surgery resident here who rotated from WHC (Washington Hospital Center) last year, it won’t be hard to identify me but I feel that I shouldn’t stay silent.”
”Seth Rich was shot twice, with three total gunshot wounds (Entry and exit, and entry). He was taken to the OR emergency where we performed and exlap and found a small injury to segment three of the liver which was packed and several small bowel injuries (pretty common for gunshots in the back exiting the abdomen), which we resected—12 cm of bowel and left him in discontinuity (didn’t hook everything back up) with the intent of performing a washout in the morning. He did not have any major vascular injuries or otherwise. I’ve seen dozens of worse cases than this which survived and nothing about his injuries suggested to me that he’d sustained a fatal wound.” -- Bill Still
My question to the above Bill Still report, is do we have a verification that Seth was dead on the sidewalk, or did he die later as the 4th year surgery resident claims. What were the exact times claimed by Law Enforcement, and their records versus and hospital admission records? We have news inferences that he died on the sidewalk, but did he REALLY or did he not?
In the Bill Still Report, the 4th-year surgery resident goes on to describe that Law Enforcement officers excluded everyone but an attending physician, banned any STAT calls, and by implication did something to ensure Seth Rich died in their presence while intimidating the attending physician who would then simply declare Rich dead, when by all means Rich should have easily SURVIVED.
In effect, if the hospital version of survivability is true, the list of suspects narrows to two assassins in Law Enforcement according to the then 4th year surgery resident, who effectually tells us that either the physician under duress murdered Rich in a hospital bed, or one of two Law Enforcement Officers that do "wet work" on the side and have a pre-signed assassin clearance in letter form from Obama himself (as do others who kill fellow Americans often have a like order at that level, such as one H.W. Bush signed for a Ross Perot and others as well, a letterhead and signed by the President assassination of U.S. Citizen authorization). Eugene / Chip (who flew drugs for Vice-President Bush's personally run with Federal resources crime syndicate and overseen in Central America by Col. North in the mid 80s, 60 to 80 kilos or whatever amounts of cocaine being in duct-tape sealed igloo type coolers marked medical supplies and attempted to be concealed from his knowledge) posted one such H.W. Bush letter back in the 1990s,
https://youtu.be/aJtETngpe6M?t=57m6s
and it still makes its rounds on Youtube. Of course, when it came to murdering fellow U.S. Citizens on U.S. soil, Chip drew his line in the sand, notified H.W., and was promptly arrested on fake charges and served felony time as so many in the Intel field who dare have a conscience do. So if there was a hospital murder, Obama would be chargeable and prosecutable for the murder just as much as the LEO (Law Enforcement Officer) Black Operations Contract Employees are.
Stefan Molyneux gives the backdrop and break down of the Seth Rich Murder and information known up to about May 17, 2017,
or that information regarding Seth Rich prior to the above new Bill Still information
In regard to "Crowdstrike" that Stefan brings up in the above video, readers should check out the news article:
What is CrowdStrike? Firm Hired by DNC has Ties to Hillary Clinton, a Ukrainian Billionaire and Google
Michael Krieger | Posted Thursday Mar 23, 2017 at 3:42 pm
See also:
and Breitbart's Aaron Klein January 6, 2017 article
DNC ‘Russian Hacking’ Conclusion Comes from Google-Linked Firm
@ http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2017/01/06/dnc-russian-hacking-conclusion-comes-google-linked-firm/
For Crowdstrike's NSA Google Capital start-up financing in 2015, refer to
And the alleged hacking narrative that was pushed by Esquire
http://www.esquire.com/news-politics/a49902/the-russian-emigre-leading-the-fight-to-protect-america/
and other places, clearly does NOT take into account Vault 7 or that it is the NSA and CIA who in and through Google, launch and mimic cyber attacks of foreign nations, using their known algorithms, etc. If anything, the DNC hack, if it happened at all, came out of NSA in Maryland or CIA in Virginia. Beyond that, it would be up to a FISA Court appointed Special Prosecutor to find out who hacked the DNC, if at all. One site
put the issue this way
Firm Hired By DNC & Relied On By FBI To Prove Russia Hacking Forced To Withdraw Anti-Russian Report
Reported in January, the FBI based its decision that it was the Russians that hacked into the DNC computers on a report commissioned by the DNC and generated by a company called CrowdStrike (the FBI was never allowed to examine the DNC server). The VOA recently caught CrowdStrike creating a bogus and unrelated hacking charge against Russia, and making up the facts to prove its veracity.
To make their determination that the Democrats were hacked by Russia, the FBI relied exclusively on information from private digital forensics company Crowdstrike. It wasn’t the FBI’s fault the DNC wouldn’t allow the FBI to look a their servers for the hacking investigation, instead forced them to use the Crowdstrike report paid for by the Party.
At the time a senior FBI law enforcement official told Wired,
“The FBI repeatedly stressed to DNC officials the necessity of obtaining direct access to servers and data, only to be rebuffed until well after the initial compromise had been mitigated.”
The FBI did substantiate that it relied on data from Crowdstrike in their investigation, but they blamed the Party for not looking at the servers themselves, according to the FBI official who spoke to wired:
The FBI repeatedly stressed to DNC officials the necessity of obtaining direct access to servers and data, only to be rebuffed until well after the initial compromise had been mitigated. This left the FBI no choice but to rely upon a third-party for information. These actions caused significant delays and inhibited the FBI from addressing the intrusion earlier,”
...The company who the DNC and FBI relied on not only made up a problem that didn’t exist, but then blamed it on Putin’s Russia. Shouldn’t that call into question the entire premise that it was the Russians who hacked into the DNC?
It must be remembered that whoever pays the Agency, including the NSA cyberlinks through which all DNC server hacking must go through
whatever the result the DNC pays Crowdstrike to issue as an agency for public consumption in their reports, that is the result that they will publish in their reports, manufactured or not.
Another article of interest in which Crowdstrike is in general terms "exposed" as MANUFACTURING false evidence of a Russian hack and then having to retract it, is found in Voice of America News, which 4 days after Crowdstrike issued a rewritten December 22, 2016 report on March 23, 2017, VOA News was quick to slam them on the alterations and NO evidence that was claimed previously in December, especially with the Ukraine narratives and lies that Crowdstrike stated it vetted some information by contacting the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), which the IISS completely denied and disavowed as a lie (or words to that effect).
The idea that a nation-state would have hackers using out of date hacking technology more than 2 years old,
and expect to be successful without in anyway updating themselves, and the which Vault 7
says the Central Intelligence Agency's Cyber Warfare Codes actively engages in foreign cyber warfare, now authorized domestically under the usurper Obama and a rogue Congress as of July 2013 to war on U.S. Citizens as hostile powers with disinformation (hacks, lies, and mass hostile propaganda based from Langley)
and it is the CIA's Vault 7 cyber technology that takes and mimics known hacker algorithms to pose as nation-states using the very same method of operation so as to get caught with leaving THAT trail while the new technology leaves without a trace, but the blame of the breach is passed on to someone else, THAT very same process happened here. So more than Admiral Rogers by light years as Head of Cyber Security at NSA is the chief suspect, the stealth jihadi and Muslim Traitor to the U.S. Constitution, the only now known to be a former Communist, John Brennan, who as CIA head in may to July 2016 is both the prime suspect on this false Russian hack and the murder of Seth Rich, which I personally believe is most likely that Brennan ordered and had launched as his own personal disinformation campaign against Donald John Trump, while attempting to solidify his position by supporting Hillary with the same rogue criminality he was known for in the theft's his private company was involved in with stealing Obama's Indonesian Citizen passport out of the U.S. Department of State in early 2008.
On May 30, 2017 White House INFOWARS Correspondent and reporter Jerome Corsi, while interviewed by Roger Stone ( a good and pleasant to watch guest host) also adds more information regarding Seth Rich
Well, for now, that's my input. Thanks.
No comments:
Post a Comment