On September 12, 2018, President Trump signed an
Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in
the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election
Let's address what REALLY appears to be coming, an attempt by President Trump to warn of at least some US Intel oversight of US Elections thanks to felony seditious conspiracy and TREASON by APPLE & GOOGLE, whose actions as utility corporations based in the United States are now geared to ally with a foreign power, CHINA, in what seems to be a coming THEFT of the 2018 electronic voting (that’s more than 1200 precincts in 26
states) and a potential hostile internet launched warfare within the United States
by China through its agents and assets inside the United States, perhaps launched and controlled at Google and Apple HQs in California, attempting in that way perhaps to bypass NSA
primary monitoring at EXTERNAL cable data entry points, so as to (as China's inside the USA hired agencies saboteurs) chaotically destroy or interfere with water,
power, and various companies at leisure by unleashing as yet unknown to the public Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems on preset agenda programs in a new form of internet corporate directed cyber-warfare (it seems to me).
As
you may well know, Google's giving the Chinese has COMPROMISED the Security of Information Integrity of US Companies like Charles Schwab on Wall Street and Toyota in America
which operate on Google Cloud, and can now be FREELY sabotaged, espionaged, or just hacked for just about anything CHINA wants to do to them.
Google is known for employing ex-DARPA (Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency or DARPA) executives who create new top secret technologies exclusively for the United States Military. For example, in 2014, former DARPA exec and then Google Exec Regina Dugan
was asking people to swallow RFID
microchips for temporary convenience, and the video still remains as yet
on Youtube at:
Since 2011, data formation has been so microscopic, that building blocks as little as 12 atoms were needed just 7 years ago at IBM Almaden.
So the idea that detection of such microscopic data manipulation, insertions, espionage monitoring, tech viral attacks or what have you can be blocked by the average US Infrastructure used computers or any consumer or business computers and software is just simply not so. In 2018, the leadership of Google and Apple openly pitched collaboration to aid China in its Artificial Intelligence https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/world/china-watch/technology/ai-innovation/ to overtake the innovation of AI in the United States, China took them up on the offer to invest billions to cover their costs. The US Military uses or is converting to a JEDI CLOUD technology,
Clouds are used not only by GOOGLE, but also by alleged corporate
adversaries of Google such as Microsoft, IBM, Oracle, Leidos, General Dynamics, and Amazon Web Services. Amazon Web Services already has classified and top secret leverages in its Cloud services,
which apparently is why they can use the US Post Office to discount them a couple dollars per package delivery costs at U.S. taxpayer expense.
Recently 7 CIA mainframe computers were knocked offline.
It is not known if this is directly related to Apple and Google encryption keys being given to CHINA, but it could be. By mid-2019
the Pentagon is expected to be operationally employing Jedi Cloud tech in
fighters and other systems that can be figured out using Apple and Google
Cloud encryption keys (which they GAVE to CHINA) and Google Cloud and Apple Cloud
are not just in most cell phones and personal and business computers now,
since 2012, they are part of our electronic voting machine tech
https://www.wnd.com/2012/05/trading-the-voting-booth-for-google-apple-apps/ which means our elections by these devices are 100% COMPROMISED. |
APPLE
and GOOGLE gave CHINA its encryption codes which allows CHINA to hack virtually
ALL US ELECTRONIC VOTING because since 2012, those machines are embedded with
GOOGLE and APPLE software, and like the NSA, there are accessible backdoors to
them now, so that they can reprogram and more than just fraction magic the
electronic voting,
and no forensic team outside of the topmost engineers of Google and Apple who DESIGNED and /or wrote these systems would ever have the technical ability to know that they who hack our 2018 and beyond elections were even there. This is WAY beyond "fraction magic" manipulations, now.
and no forensic team outside of the topmost engineers of Google and Apple who DESIGNED and /or wrote these systems would ever have the technical ability to know that they who hack our 2018 and beyond elections were even there. This is WAY beyond "fraction magic" manipulations, now.
It now involves so many "in time of war" felonies, that Tim Cook and
Mark Zuckerberg (and those heads of their respective companies running them
involved in the Cloud Encryption keys transfer to CHINA) could effectually be
arrested by the US Military, tried, convicted and either shot or hung as enemy
agents of a foreign power.
The CLOUD encryption tech transfer and the electronic voting INSIDE HACK, could effectively take every one of any of the 26 states and 1200 plus jurisdictions that they are installed in for the Democrats, and could even give us the fake 147% of all registered voters numbers (like with Philadelphia for Obama in 2012) voting exclusively Democrat, and the return results, however skewed they are, would be EXPECTED by the Dems to be fully accepted, even if a 100% sweep in the 26 electronic voting states with average percentages that are 73% to 86% or what have you in heavily Republican jurisdictions, where there is no way in hell that any such numbers could be justified as untampered with and changed, especially if there were an immediate re-vote by PAPER ballot. There is already a 1 in 8 voter registration discrepancy in US voting (about 12.5 to 13%) that includes multi-state registration, unremoved dead from the rolls, and voter fraud by various means. For that reason, for what I understand to be more than 2 decades now, various polling firms and news outlets intentionally source generally at or around 15% excessive Democrats to always skew the numbers to reflect a perception that protects that much election fraud tipping in favor of Democratic Party candidates. It is a targeted and predetermined and apparently expected amount of election fraud, that might best be described by Democrat Party Insiders to the effect of "It is an open secret", as the saying goes.
At the moment, Google in China is developing the Dragon Fly program, despite Google Execs like Sergey Brin in 2010 KNOWING its design and application smacks of "totalitarianism"
https://gizmodo.com/heres-the-letter-1-400-google-workers-sent-leadership-i-1828393599
NOW wants to develop Dragonfly in China first, perhaps beta test out the kinks before a 10,000 times worse than a US Pearl Harbor of the Internet launch? The Dragonfly program basically not only goes into any android Apple phone and deletes anything it is programmed to isolate and destroy, but also in concert with Apple technologies Google will also be able to use this program to do the same in computers, so that much like the one day loss of the whole archive of the White House Daily letters from the White House website in September 2018 by its own internal jackasses
The CLOUD encryption tech transfer and the electronic voting INSIDE HACK, could effectively take every one of any of the 26 states and 1200 plus jurisdictions that they are installed in for the Democrats, and could even give us the fake 147% of all registered voters numbers (like with Philadelphia for Obama in 2012) voting exclusively Democrat, and the return results, however skewed they are, would be EXPECTED by the Dems to be fully accepted, even if a 100% sweep in the 26 electronic voting states with average percentages that are 73% to 86% or what have you in heavily Republican jurisdictions, where there is no way in hell that any such numbers could be justified as untampered with and changed, especially if there were an immediate re-vote by PAPER ballot. There is already a 1 in 8 voter registration discrepancy in US voting (about 12.5 to 13%) that includes multi-state registration, unremoved dead from the rolls, and voter fraud by various means. For that reason, for what I understand to be more than 2 decades now, various polling firms and news outlets intentionally source generally at or around 15% excessive Democrats to always skew the numbers to reflect a perception that protects that much election fraud tipping in favor of Democratic Party candidates. It is a targeted and predetermined and apparently expected amount of election fraud, that might best be described by Democrat Party Insiders to the effect of "It is an open secret", as the saying goes.
At the moment, Google in China is developing the Dragon Fly program, despite Google Execs like Sergey Brin in 2010 KNOWING its design and application smacks of "totalitarianism"
https://gizmodo.com/heres-the-letter-1-400-google-workers-sent-leadership-i-1828393599
NOW wants to develop Dragonfly in China first, perhaps beta test out the kinks before a 10,000 times worse than a US Pearl Harbor of the Internet launch? The Dragonfly program basically not only goes into any android Apple phone and deletes anything it is programmed to isolate and destroy, but also in concert with Apple technologies Google will also be able to use this program to do the same in computers, so that much like the one day loss of the whole archive of the White House Daily letters from the White House website in September 2018 by its own internal jackasses
instead it will be a new program of 1984 upon ALL news, comments, articles, any information selectively targeted by DragonFly II that will be collectively launched by China in concert with the treasonous conspiracy of both Apple and Google against the United States from citizen to companies to Governments of the United States, and make the rewrite anarchy of George Orwell's book "1984" a nightmarish reality for anyone technologically attached to their apps and systems.
Some 1400 Google employees in their protest of developing Dragonfly for CHINA stated collectively that:
"...the decision to build Dragonfly was made in secret, and progressed even with the AI Principles in place makes clear that the Principles alone are not enough. We urgently need more transparency, a seat at the table, and a commitment to clear and open processes: Google employees need to know what we’re building."
The White House website (in regard to searching easily for what I want, such as a readily available chronological list of recent executive orders) is so bad, that all I have is very crass profanity for those who design and oversee it, and say nicely, they should be both FIRED and blacklisted (or at least very negatively referenced). Fortunately, others didn't give up on monitoring the pain in the ass to get to Exec Orders, and to my surprise, as I am trying to bring awareness to the issue, former newsman Greg Hunter posts a weekly wrap up that features that TRUMP finally got the message (after many weeks of trying to reach or inform him and others on Google and Apple).
Some 1400 Google employees in their protest of developing Dragonfly for CHINA stated collectively that:
"...the decision to build Dragonfly was made in secret, and progressed even with the AI Principles in place makes clear that the Principles alone are not enough. We urgently need more transparency, a seat at the table, and a commitment to clear and open processes: Google employees need to know what we’re building."
The White House website (in regard to searching easily for what I want, such as a readily available chronological list of recent executive orders) is so bad, that all I have is very crass profanity for those who design and oversee it, and say nicely, they should be both FIRED and blacklisted (or at least very negatively referenced). Fortunately, others didn't give up on monitoring the pain in the ass to get to Exec Orders, and to my surprise, as I am trying to bring awareness to the issue, former newsman Greg Hunter posts a weekly wrap up that features that TRUMP finally got the message (after many weeks of trying to reach or inform him and others on Google and Apple).
Unfortunately, Hunter hasn't yet got the news of the real reason behind this important Executive Order...one that fails to shut down electronic voting, but orders at least a form of election integrity oversight through the Director of National Intelligence and various Intelligence Agencies that can both monitor and report directly to him regarding any forensic evidence and other observations to that effect.
Below I include the Executive Order President Trump signed this past September 12th. Google and Apple are effectively being served notice, along with China and other election meddling Intelligence Agencies (such as GCHQ of the UK, 2016 hired by Obama and communicated further by Susan Rice in November 2016 against an elected Donald Trump)
http://halturnerradioshow.com/index.php/news/world-news/1937-proof-british-intelligence-spied-on-donald-trump-at-the-direct-request-of-president-barack-obama-and-a-later-renewed-request-by-susan-rice
et al. as well.
Executive Orders
Executive Order on Imposing Certain Sanctions in
the Event of Foreign Interference in a United States Election
Issued on: September 12, 2018
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution
and the laws of the United States of America, including the International
Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National
Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), section 212(f) of the
Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)), and section 301 of
title 3, United States Code,
I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America,
find that the ability of persons located, in whole or in substantial part,
outside the United States to interfere in or undermine public confidence in
United States elections, including through the unauthorized accessing of election
and campaign infrastructure or the covert distribution of propaganda and
disinformation, constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national
security and foreign policy of the United States.
Although there has been no
evidence of a foreign power altering the outcome or vote tabulation in any
United States election, foreign powers have historically sought to exploit
America’s free and open political system. In recent years, the proliferation of
digital devices and internet-based communications has created significant
vulnerabilities and magnified the scope and intensity of the threat of foreign
interference, as illustrated in the 2017 Intelligence Community
Assessment.
I
hereby declare a national emergency
to deal with this threat.
Accordingly, I hereby order:
Section 1. (a) Not later than 45 days after the conclusion of
a United States election, the Director of National Intelligence, in
consultation with the heads of any other appropriate executive departments and
agencies (agencies), shall conduct an assessment of any information indicating
that a foreign government, or any person acting as an agent of or on behalf of
a foreign government, has acted with the intent or purpose of interfering in
that election. The assessment shall identify, to the maximum extent
ascertainable, the nature of any foreign interference and any methods employed
to execute it, the persons involved, and the foreign government or governments
that authorized, directed, sponsored, or supported it. The Director of National
Intelligence shall deliver this assessment and appropriate supporting
information to the President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the
Treasury, the Secretary of Defense, the Attorney General, and the Secretary of
Homeland Security.
(b) Within 45 days of receiving the assessment and information
described in section 1(a) of this order, the Attorney General and the Secretary
of Homeland Security, in consultation with the heads of any other appropriate
agencies and, as appropriate, State and local officials, shall deliver to the
President, the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, and the
Secretary of Defense a report evaluating, with respect to the United States
election that is the subject of the assessment described in section 1(a):
(i) the extent to which any foreign interference that targeted
election infrastructure materially affected the security or integrity of that
infrastructure, the tabulation of votes, or the timely transmission of election
results; and
(ii) if any foreign interference involved activities targeting
the infrastructure of, or pertaining to, a political organization, campaign, or
candidate, the extent to which such activities materially affected the security
or integrity of that infrastructure, including by unauthorized access to,
disclosure or threatened disclosure of, or alteration or falsification of,
information or data.
The report shall identify any material issues of fact with
respect to these matters that the Attorney General and the Secretary of
Homeland Security are unable to evaluate or reach agreement on at the time the
report is submitted. The report shall also include updates and recommendations,
when appropriate, regarding remedial actions to be taken by the United States
Government, other than the sanctions described in sections 2 and 3 of this
order.
(c) Heads of all relevant agencies shall transmit to the
Director of National Intelligence any information relevant to the execution of
the Director’s duties pursuant to this order, as appropriate and consistent
with applicable law. If relevant information emerges after the submission of
the report mandated by section 1(a) of this order, the Director, in
consultation with the heads of any other appropriate agencies, shall amend the
report, as appropriate, and the Attorney General and the Secretary of Homeland
Security shall amend the report required by section 1(b), as appropriate.
(d) Nothing in this order shall prevent the head of any agency
or any other appropriate official from tendering to the President, at any time
through an appropriate channel, any analysis, information, assessment, or
evaluation of foreign interference in a United States election.
(e) If information indicating that foreign interference in a
State, tribal, or local election within the United States has occurred is
identified, it may be included, as appropriate, in the assessment mandated by
section 1(a) of this order or in the report mandated by section 1(b) of this
order, or submitted to the President in an independent report.
(f) Not later than 30 days following the date of this order,
the Secretary of State, the Secretary of the Treasury, the Attorney General,
the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence
shall develop a framework for the process that will be used to carry out their
respective responsibilities pursuant to this order. The framework, which may be
classified in whole or in part, shall focus on ensuring that agencies fulfill
their responsibilities pursuant to this order in a manner that maintains
methodological consistency; protects law enforcement or other sensitive
information and intelligence sources and methods; maintains an appropriate
separation between intelligence functions and policy and legal judgments;
ensures that efforts to protect electoral processes and institutions are
insulated from political bias; and respects the principles of free speech and
open debate.
Sec. 2. (a) All property and interests in property that are in
the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or
hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of
the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported,
withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in: any foreign person determined by the Secretary
of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney
General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security:
(i) to have directly or indirectly engaged in, sponsored,
concealed, or otherwise been complicit in foreign interference in a United
States election;
(ii) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided
financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or
in support of, any activity described in subsection (a)(i) of this section or
any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to
this order; or
(iii) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or
purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose
property or interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order.
(b) Executive Order 13694 of April 1, 2015, as amended by
Executive Order 13757 of December 28, 2016, remains in effect. This order is
not intended to, and does not, serve to limit the Secretary of the Treasury’s
discretion to exercise the authorities provided in Executive Order 13694. Where
appropriate, the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Attorney
General and the Secretary of State, may exercise the authorities described in
Executive Order 13694 or other authorities in conjunction with the Secretary of
the Treasury’s exercise of authorities provided in this order.
(c) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply
except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders,
directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and
notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted
prior to the date of this order.
Sec. 3. Following the transmission of the assessment mandated
by section 1(a) and the report mandated by section 1(b):
(a) the Secretary of the Treasury shall review the assessment
mandated by section 1(a) and the report mandated by section 1(b), and, in
consultation with the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, and the
Secretary of Homeland Security, impose all appropriate sanctions pursuant to
section 2(a) of this order and any appropriate sanctions described in section
2(b) of this order; and
(b) the Secretary of State and the Secretary of the Treasury,
in consultation with the heads of other appropriate agencies, shall jointly
prepare a recommendation for the President as to whether additional sanctions
against foreign persons may be appropriate in response to the identified
foreign interference and in light of the evaluation in the report mandated by
section 1(b) of this order, including, as appropriate and consistent with
applicable law, proposed sanctions with respect to the largest business
entities licensed or domiciled in a country whose government authorized,
directed, sponsored, or supported election interference, including at least one
entity from each of the following sectors: financial services, defense, energy,
technology, and transportation (or, if inapplicable to that country’s largest
business entities, sectors of comparable strategic significance to that foreign
government). The recommendation shall include an assessment of the effect of
the recommended sanctions on the economic and national security interests of
the United States and its allies. Any recommended sanctions shall be
appropriately calibrated to the scope of the foreign interference identified,
and may include one or more of the following with respect to each targeted
foreign person:
(i) blocking and prohibiting all transactions in a person’s
property and interests in property subject to United States jurisdiction;
(ii) export license restrictions under any statute or
regulation that requires the prior review and approval of the United States
Government as a condition for the export or re-export of goods or services;
(iii) prohibitions on United States financial institutions
making loans or providing credit to a person;
(iv) restrictions on transactions in foreign exchange in which
a person has any interest;
(v) prohibitions on transfers of credit or payments between
financial institutions, or by, through, or to any financial institution, for
the benefit of a person;
(vi) prohibitions on United States persons investing in or
purchasing equity or debt of a person;
(vii) exclusion of a person’s alien corporate officers from
the United States;
(viii) imposition on a person’s alien principal executive
officers of any of the sanctions described in this section; or
(ix) any other measures authorized by law.
Sec. 4. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the
type of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2))
by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in
property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability
to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby
prohibit such donations as provided by section 2 of this order.
Sec. 5. The prohibitions in section 2 of this order include the
following:
(a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds,
goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and
interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and
(b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds,
goods, or services from any such person.
Sec. 6. I hereby find that the unrestricted immigrant and
nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens whose property and
interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would be detrimental
to the interests of the United States, and I hereby suspend entry into the
United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, of such persons. Such persons
shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July
24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security
Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions).
Sec. 7. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the
purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate
any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.
(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions
set forth in this order is prohibited.
Sec. 8. For the purposes of this order:
(a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;
(b) the term “entity” means a partnership, association, trust,
joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization;
(c) the term “United States person” means any United States
citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the
United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign
branches), or any person (including a foreign person) in the United States;
(d) the term “election infrastructure” means information and
communications technology and systems used by or on behalf of the Federal
Government or a State or local government in managing the election process,
including voter registration databases, voting machines, voting tabulation
equipment, and equipment for the secure transmission of election results;
(e) the term “United States election” means any election for
Federal office held on, or after, the date of this order;
(f) the term “foreign interference,” with respect to an
election, includes any covert, fraudulent, deceptive, or unlawful actions or
attempted actions of a foreign government, or of any person acting as an agent
of or on behalf of a foreign government, undertaken with the purpose or effect
of influencing, undermining confidence in, or altering the result or reported
result of, the election, or undermining public confidence in election processes
or institutions;
(g) the term “foreign government” means any national, state,
provincial, or other governing authority, any political party, or any official
of any governing authority or political party, in each case of a country other
than the United States;
(h) the term “covert,” with respect to an action or attempted
action, means characterized by an intent or apparent intent that the role of a
foreign government will not be apparent or acknowledged publicly; and
(i) the term “State” means the several States or any of the
territories, dependencies, or possessions of the United States.
Sec. 9. For those persons whose property and interests in
property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional
presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer
funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures
to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I
therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the
national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a
listing or determination made pursuant to section 2 of this order.
Sec. 10. Nothing in this order shall prohibit transactions for
the conduct of the official business of the United States Government by
employees, grantees, or contractors thereof.
Sec. 11. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with
the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take
such actions, including the promulgation of rules and regulations, and to
employ all powers granted to the President by IEEPA as may be necessary to
carry out the purposes of this order. The Secretary of the Treasury may
re-delegate any of these functions to other officers within the Department of
the Treasury consistent with applicable law. All agencies of the United States
Government are hereby directed to take all appropriate measures within their
authority to carry out the provisions of this order.
Sec. 12. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with
the Attorney General and the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit
the recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency
declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C.
1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)).
Sec. 13. This order shall be implemented consistent with 50
U.S.C. 1702(b)(1) and (3).
Sec. 14. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to
impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or
agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management
and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable
law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any
right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by
any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities,
its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
DONALD J. TRUMP
THE WHITE HOUSE,
September 12, 2018.
No comments:
Post a Comment