Obama Eligibility Issue hits the National Press Club, June 2011

(Edited on June 30, 2011: Press Club video updates loaded)

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=317085

On June 29, 2011, WND addressed the National Press Club on Obama's Ineligibility

An Adobe Editor attested the Obama Birth Document as being fraudulent at the same meeting.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=316749

Esquire liable to $30,000,000 actionable libel suit for intentional malicious false reporting on Corsi and Farah

 Press Club Help: NBC Issue for Dummies.

In Weedin v. Chin Bow, 274 US 657 (1927) @ 660-661, you will note that Wong Kim Ark (WKA, 169 US 647 (1898) exceeded what was recognized in the cited Annals of Congress, re: February 3-4 of 1790 (WKA and Weedin quoting Mr. Burke @ 1160).

In the debate of the Naturalization Bill of 1790, Congress

http://memory.loc.gov/cgi-bin/ampage?collId=llac&fileName=001/llac001.db&recNum=573

from pp. 1147 – 1164

was persuaded by several particulars: that like the later WKA gloss-over mention @ 169 US 647 @ 666 (IV.),

in that Congress in 1790 stated that:

1) Citizenship in the USA should be unique like the ancient Romans (cf. Mr. Hartley pp. 1147-1148, Mr. Jackson 1153); 2) That the influence of naturalization did NOT necessarily follow the Common Law of Britain and Europe and the application of in pari materia (where statute construes the law passed) past 1701 A.D. in regard to naturalization (cf. Mr. Page @ 1148, 1153).

3) Under the argument put forth by Mr. Tucker and agreed to by Mr. Madison,  it appears and very well  may be that a proper interpretation of the NBC clause 14 year residency requirement meant simply that only those Natural Born Citizens (born of two US parents on US soil and a sole US Citizen his entire life with no dual or multi-nationalities) who has lived as a citizen of a single state the immediate 14 years prior to running for the US Presidency, , as with that of a US Senator and US Representative is supposed to be a citizen of their state the immediate number of years in order to run their (in Constitutional Originalism), is or was intended to be (by the Founders) as those qualified in their running for office (Mr. Tucker @ 1154-1155 discussing the that "He thought the citizens...every person who was eligible under their State laws and constitutions" and applied this to the Constitution in such a way as though to infer a State residency of a native lifelong permanent and sole resident of the United States on a national scale).

In fact, paternal (including the two parent citizenship rule of both father and mother citizens) was known and accepted as required in defining citizenship, WKA citing @ 668 the 1343 A.D.  Statute in the Rolls of Parliament , followed by the 1350 A.D. clarification @ 668 of WKA , followed by the 1483 A.D.  TWO PARENT DEFINITION OF CITIZENSHIP that by COMMON LAW, “that he who is born beyond the sea, and his father and mother are English, their issue inherit by the common law…”

The two parent statute therefore both preceded by centuries as well as followed Coke’s decision by decades in 1677, 1708, 1731 -- as was cited by WKA @ 671, appears to follow the application of fathers and mothers of children whose fathers were presumed natural-born English subjects.

 

 

{{Addendum July 02, 2011

See also 

http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/02/obligatory-literal-definition-of.html 

end of addendum}}

Congress and the Founding Fathers of the period appear to have adopted not only John Locke’s second treatise chapter “Of Paternal Power”, but to have ignored British Statutes on the naturalization subject at least past 1731 A.D., while accepting works like Vattel’s Law of Nations.

The Court in WKA concluded by majority that WKA was a citizen of the United States under the criteria of the 14th Amendment because –

1) Wong Kim Ark was born in the United States.

Wong Kim Ark never renounced US Allegiance, nor did his parents do so for him.

2) Wong Kim Ark was maintained in a permanent US State domicile every year of his life as his primary residence from birth to age 21.

3) Neither of his parents was employed in either a diplomatic or in ANY OFFICIAL capacity at the time of WKA’s birth.

Form FS-277, signed and sworn to by Obama’s mother before the required US Consulate, http://www.scribd.com/doc/35161730/Stanley-Ann-Dunham-Obama-Soetoro-Passport-Application-File-Strunk-v-Dept-of-State-FOIA-Release-FINAL-7-29-10

that Barack lost US residency, that Barack swore allegiance and was naturalized (indefinitely) to the nation of Indonesia as of August 13, 1968. Hence, even by WKA standards @ 652-654 and 704-705, as well as Minor v. Happersett,

http://supreme.justia.com/us/88/162/case.html

...all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. ...It is sufficient for everything we have now to consider that all children born of citizen parents within the jurisdiction are themselves citizens. “ 

Obama without a US Citizen Father and without proof of a US Birth (forgeries and refusal to produce in Court genuine documents are unacceptable) clearly shows us all that Obama is NOT a 14th Amendment Citizen, but an illegal office holder of the US Presidency.  And finally, lawyers like Mario Apuzzo are finally writing more extensively about Obama's Social Security Number fraud as well.

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/06/snopescom-provides-misleading-and.html

Mr Apuzzo  states in that extensive and well written article, 

Perkins v. Elg, 307 U.S. 325 (1939) (confirmed that a child born in the United States to a naturalized U.S. citizen father and naturalized citizen mother, the mother being derivatively naturalized by marrying a U.S. citizen, was a “natural born Citizen.”

cf. Perkins v. Elg @  349-350.

http://supreme.justia.com/us/307/325/case.html“The court below, properly recognizing the existence of an actual controversy with the defendants Page 307 U. S. 350 (Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Haworth, 300 U. S. 227), declared Miss Elg “to be a natural born citizen of the United States…”  and elsewhere just simply refers to her as "citizen of the United States". 

 Obama was born with a United Kingdom and Colonies Citizenship through his father, and his minor US (and married into UKC) mother naturalized him through her second husband to alien country with which we had no Treaty, either directly or by International Convention.  In 1968, when Indonesia was no longer a sovereign nation, Barack Hussein Obama was legally adopted by Lolo Soetoro and his name was legally changed to Barry Soetoro (Soebarkah) of Indonesia, with a religious faith of being a Moslem (with the approval of his mother) in Indonesian Court, and in Indonesian School Registry.   He did not repatriate to Kenya or Britain, but went to a totally alien place NOT covered by Perkins v. Elg in 307 US 325 (1939).

as Obama’s unique circumstances do NOT apply. @ 329 the operation of Obama’s US Citizenship legally ceased with his adoption into Indonesia, his mother’s declaration on FS-277 to the US Consulate of new naturalization-allegiance and intention of indefinite residency in Indonesia on August 13, 1968. 

At NO TIME in a Court of Law, has the Obama defense team EVER introduced into evidence a United States Certification of Live Birth. Only once in all the actions in court that have now cost Obama for America over 2.8 million dollars, Obama for America payments to Perkins Coie: 

4^th Quarter 2008    (amended figure) $205,323.00

April Quarterly, 2009                        $314,018.06 

July Quarterly 2009,                          $270,754.18
October Quarterly, 2009                    $688,316.42
 1st Quarter, 2010                              $261,206.69

2nd Quarter, 2010                              $248,483.94

3rd Quarter, 2010                               $234,284.82

4^th Quarter, 2010                                $241,422.79

1st Quarter, 2011                                $165,008.20

This last payment you can see @

http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2011/Q1/C00431445/B_PAYEE_C00431445.html

Layered Technologies were paid $2,027.  Did they FUBAR the Obama forgery?  Just asking.

Totals to defend against required introduction of Obama Identity into Court Evidence: $2,628,817.80

This does NOT include legal representation by the US Attorneys on the Taxpayer dime for an additional (of what I believe now tallies at least) $1,400,000 (estimate), or a total of what probably is about $4,000,000 likely expense minimum as of March 31st 2011 between Obama for America and the US Taxpayers. 

  In only one Leftist Judge Rejection decision, has there been any Obama defense.  And what was that?  Oh yeah, Bauer's overpaid and whiny lame argument of two media reports being as acceptable alternatives to actually PRODUCING IN COURT THAT EVIDENCE (i.e. the original documents) TO VET THE PERSON IN QUESTION is taken and recorded, where he flippantly referred (in the Court's footnote) to Factcheck.org (a front for a former Obama employer, the Annenberg Foundation, an organization with known alleged Communist and Socialist activisms) to be a PRIMARY source of what he claimed vetted Obama.   Bauer himself (and Perkins Coie by extension) REFUSED to bring the alleged documents themselves into evidence. From that decision, the footnote reads:

 

Quote:

1 President Obama has publicly produced a certified copy of a birth certificate showing that he was born on August 4, 1961, in Honolulu Hawaii. See, e.g., Factcheck.org, “Born in the U.S.A.: The truth about Obama’s birth certificate,” available at http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html (concluding that the birth certificate is genuine, and noting a contemporaneous birth announcement published in a Honolulu newspaper). Hawaii officials have publicly verified that they have President Obama’s “original birth certificate on record in accordance with state policies and procedures.” See “Certified,” Honolulu Star Bulletin, Oct. 31, 2008. This Court can take judicial notice of these public news reports. See The Washington Post v. Robinson, 935 F.2d 282, 291 (D.C. Cir. 1991); Agee v. Muskie, 629 F.2d 80, 81 n.1, 90 (D.C. Cir. 1980).Unquote.

The greater preponderance of evidence suggests that Obama is what the NATION OF KENYA claims of Barack in 2008 and 2010, that “Obama the US President was born in Kenya” http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/04/obama-fec-audited-in-2011-little-bit.html

(likely at Lady Griggs Hospital in Mombasa, but we are not allowed to ascertain it with finality). We do know that because Barack uses an Identity Theft Social Security Number issued to someone born in 1890, and has multiple SS#s (which is illegal), and because Bauer will not dare introduce any Obama Birth Certificate into evidence (because both his Long and Short forms are forged), it is likely that Barack was NOT born in the United States, and that his actual birth may have been just as he claimed in 2009, to be 3 months prior to the Bay of Pigs or January 1961. Since Bauer (and by extension, Perkins Coie) refuses to offer a genuine birth certificate in a Court of Law per legal requirements (333 US 640 (1948) @ 653 per 533 US 53 (2001) @ 54,62), or any pre-Brennan stolen Obama passports

http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2010/10/greta-van-susteren-and-others-in-media.html

...and since Obama’s mother was not either of Statute age 19, and certainly NOT of voting age (21) at the time of his birth, Obama not only has no legality as President now, but can still be legally challenged in Court for running for 2012, even in the primary stage.

Unfortunately, we have to have a concrete injury such as being unlawfully arrested by the Obama Administration before having standing, as shown in June 2011 by the US Supreme Court in Bond v. US,  564 U. S. ____ (2011)

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/2011/06/bond-v-united-states-and-standing-to.html

Now that we have the ground rules for what constitutes Article III standing...for every unlawful Obama Administration Arrest, we need to have those US Citizens do a legal push back in the Courts, and do a straight shot to the US Supreme Court, argue exigency and Article III standing with all the argument data on the Law and the facts that easily by preponderance rule against Obama, and remove the felon (and I mean that literally he is a felonious criminal) from Office by an order of the US Supreme Court issuing an order for his removal and arrest. All legal, peaceful, and properly followed within the Law. 

Rand Paul, Gas Tax and TSA video positions, plus my commentary

 Taxes (regarding a Gas Tax proposal in May 2011)





Interestingly, Rand Paul cites our inflation as about 10%.  It was worse in 2009 and 2010 under Obama at 12-14%.  Unemployment and underemployment now stands at 25.6%, with about 16.9% unemployment, as since Bush I in 1992, the revisions of how we do not report actual the de facto unemployed has been manipulated term after term.  I would argue that Rand Paul, though well intentioned, may be under-valuing the current inflation of what appears to me to be (across the board) as high as 14.9% as of June 2011 for the fiscal year 2011 for the average low and middle income consumer. 

On a Public Relations line Rand Paul mistakenly attributes as true, a COCO (Company Owned Company Operated) C-Store Station profit on gas at the pump being reflective of what the Oil Corporation itself makes as a profit per gallon. 

Senator Rand mistakenly cites the traditional 7 cents per gallon average profit per gallon made at the Company Owned Company Operated Service Station as the profit margin.   The Corporate Drilling, Refining, Distribution of Oil is an entirely different world of business from the local C-Store Gas Station.  It is comprised of different operating profits and losses than that of a Retail linked Industry in which the final product is marketed and sold on average of 9 to 16 cents a gallon on up in the peak (highest volume sales) seasons (usually summer) and at a ratio of about 7 cents a gallon in slow (lowest volume sales) seasons (usually winter). 
 
In California, the combined Oil Corporations have on at least two occasions from 2001 to 2005 had an excess 50 cents per gallon profit increase upon California consumers over the normal ratio of costs for approximately 90 - 100 days on each occassion.  These were hikes to enable the oil companies to simultaneously refurbish their stations and remodel their C-Stores, etc.  These two are NOT inclusive of the MTBE pump upgrades or the necessary environmental compliance that is shared across the board.  When a Air Resources compliance such as a dripless nozzle is given two or several years, you would not expect an upkick in ALL the Oil Companies raising their prices over and above a set ratio of refinery per gallon paid prices, except in California.  But such a nozzle cost increase is NOT factored as a spike.  Nor are drive-off maintenance or other costs which increase a station's price as 2 cents a gallon more than his competitor to pay for the cost increase something that would "spike" prices at 50 cents a gallon throughout an entire State by ALL the Oil Corporations.

  Exxon-Mobil, Shell, BP, etc. are all in on these increases easily observable to the average consumer who pays attention to oil prices and what they will see at the stations they drive into or around.  In order to maximize their profits, most gas stations have now been sold to Franchise Owners, and this is done for two reason: 1) to reduce expenditures and maximize profits, 2) to hide market manipulations and overcharging.  In California, even though the bulk of refinery oil is pipelined down from Alaska, when the market slumps oil, say from $70 a barrel to $60 a barrel, the average price adjustment can take up to 6 weeks to reflect at the pump, even if it takes far less than two weeks to pipeline hot oil down from Alaska, the Oil Corporations will maximize their profits in this method of heliumizing the price at the pump to stay up in their favor.  But when the cost of a barrel of oil increases, say the same ratio of $60 to $70 a barrel (although now we are dealing with 91-105 actual figures), even though it might take 6 weeks to ship it to other parts of the country and up to 10 days for delivery from North Alaska to California's refinery apportionments at that higher price, nevertheless, the call goes out the same day, sometimes several times a  day, and immediately the stations will increase the price of their gas at the pump to reflect a new cost not yet purchased or only that very same day paid for by the oil companies, even though they are selling from a far lower cost supply.  The consumers are given the short end of the stick.  The same principle, however, also applies for the groceries you buy, and the existing inventory in most any consumer store you go to where the average profit margin is a minimum of 31.5% on up.    That is 31.5% profit margin at the rock bottom minimum, so I suggest that Rand Paul has been misinformed as to the alleged 7% figures.

If Senator Paul needs further proof, I would ask him, how is it that Exxon-Mobil prior to 9-11-2001 had only an annual profit margin of $3,000,000,000 and within 8 years increased that profit margin by 38 billion dollars to annual profit revenues of $41,000,000,000?   Did we have an inflation index of 1200% over those 7 years, or did the oil companies rip off the American Consumer at the pump?   Perhaps they could account to some profit by the sale of thousands of stations in 1-2 years for a single year up-kick in revenue, but not year after year after year.  Is America being gouged?  Well, yes.  But what about Obama?

Obama the Usurper of the US Presidency, a regular violator of the US Constitution, (above and beyond his basic NOT being the US Constitution 2.1.5 required US Natural Born Citizen (having no proof in a Court of Law he was even born in the US, and having no US Citizen for a biological father) flushed 3,800,000,000,000 of America's taxpayer dollars into a sewer, and we have no brand new National Electric Grid, no great society of  3.9% unemployment and 3% annual inflation or less to show for it.  Obama gouged over 100 times that taken by profit by the oil Companies and urinated it away, and oppressed America with Socialism on the way to the full shackles of Communism.  And in the spirit of Obama wealth redistribution, black mobs now do flash mob robberies of stores, as part of their Black Redistribution of wealth heritage from other Black radicals who insist on stealing their neighbors stuff, because they have a right to violate the 10 Commandments because greed and laziness is their deity, and Obama their Dathan who will lead them all to destruction, instead of uplifting their hearts and character to be the best they can be, to follow the 10 Commandments and be a part of American exceptionalism in their daily lives.  



Rand questions on the TSA


I would demand that anyone with a Burka, irregardless of the a need to dismantle the TSA zap you with invasive x-rays or be sexually groped instead of metal detected and electronically bomb sniffed like a metal detector would, that those wearing Burkas be always strip searched and facial recognition and fingerprinted separately from all passengers in an encased room able to withstand 30 lbs of high explosives being blasted.

The Burka technique is how the kidnappers were able to transport the kidnapped victim of reknown, Elisabeth Smart, from place to place, and how terrorist like Hamas deliver suicide bombers and smuggle weapons in Israel and the terrorist-occupied territories of the West Bank and Gaza Strip.  In Iraq, Afghanistan, and various nations of the world, it is the mule delivery system of choice for weapons and drugs, often hiding me under the Burkas.  It is a masculine favorite so much, that sometimes the men of Hamas dress up in Burkas for rally for or against this or that publicity shots (usually being the ones holding up the AK-47s to tell them apart).  Oh well.

American Media, hooked on Liberal Socialism as addictive to them as crack?  Why couldn't they be hooked on Swing



and come to their senses...unless they fully intend to help America be advanced into Socialism based on an ideal that it would only be like British Socialism at its best or worst, instead of the end goal of Communism?  Yikes. 

Alan Jackson, Country Gospel - Traditional Protestant Hymns

Colossians 3 (King James Version)

 ¹If ye then be risen with Christ, seek those things which are above, where Christ sitteth on the right hand of God.
 ²Set your affection on things above, not on things on the earth.
 ³For ye are dead, and your life is hid with Christ in God.
 ⁴When Christ, who is our life, shall appear, then shall ye also appear with him in glory.
 ⁵Mortify therefore your members which are upon the earth; fornication, uncleanness, inordinate affection, evil concupiscence, and covetousness, which is idolatry:
 ⁶For which things' sake the wrath of God cometh on the children of disobedience:
 ⁷In the which ye also walked some time, when ye lived in them.
 ⁸But now ye also put off all these; anger, wrath, malice, blasphemy, filthy communication out of your mouth.
 ⁹Lie not one to another, seeing that ye have put off the old man with his deeds;
 ¹⁰And have put on the new man, which is renewed in knowledge after the image of him that created him:
 ¹¹Where there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, Barbarian, Scythian, bond nor free....



En arche een ho Logos,
kai Logos een pros ton Theon,
kai Theos een ho Logos.  (John 1:1 in Greek transliteration)


John 1
1 In the beginning was the Word, 
and the Word was with G-D, 
and the Word was G-D.

 In actual order, John 1:1c reads, "and G-D was the Word". / kai Theos een ho Logos.

John 1:1's,  In the beginning was the Word.  Jesus being the WORD / Logos  "By the WORD of the L-RD were the heavens made; and all the host of them by the breath of his mouth." (Psalm 33:6) Colossians 1:15-17  {of Christ] :"who is the image of G-D the invisible before-the-birth of all Creation because in Him were created all the things in the heavens and those upon the Earth, those invisible and those invisible: whether thrones, whether lord-ships, whether (first)rulers, whether authorities - ALL THINGS THROUGH HIM AND FOR HIM HAVE BEEN CREATED, and He is prior to all things, and all things in Him *stand*together*with*(Him)* / *stand*because*of*(His power)."   -- translation mine. Existing prior to all things, and all things finding their existence / birth / origin in Him:  all Creation is upheld or cast down for HIS glory, and by HIS power. One word translated a little differently than you might be used to seeing, is "prototokos". Translated as First-born in the KJV, in Colossians and Revelation 1, it is Proto ("before") and tokos (from 'tikto' - meaning "to bear or bring forth"). In these two passages (Col. 1:15, Rev. 1:5, especially -- the more correct Greek to English usage is "before the birth".) Hence, exercising His right of inheritance to all things from His Father as He who is legally - a First-born as He existing "before the birth" of all Creation and all things created that were created (hence as uncreated G-D in G-D). Revelation 1:8 -  I AM -- the Alpha and the Omega, (the) Beginning and (the) End, says the L-RD: The BEING, and who was, and who is returning (as) the ALMIGHTY Revelation 1:11 -  I AM -- the Alpha and the Omega -- the FIRST [He before all] and the Last [the most extreme end, to the end of forever].  (Direct Greek to English translation) Hebrews 11:3 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the Word of G-D, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear. When John uses the word prototokos in Revelation 1:5, he does NOT "just" explain Christ as being the first one born back from the dead...but instead, reaches down, and digs deeper into its meaning. Christ is not only "before the birth of all Creation", but: "He (is) before the birth out of the dead (ones), and the Ruler of the Kings of the Earth." (Revelation 1:5)  This relates to His Messianic lineage, and His origins in eternity, as stated in Micah 5:2 ...He shall come forth unto me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have been from of old, from everlasting.   In Colossians 1:15, Paul refers to Christ as the "prototokos pases ktiseos" -- "(the) One who is pre-eminent above and over all Creation and its Creatures."   If we compare this to Revelation 3:14's "he arche tes ktiseos", we see that Jesus as the Logos is (again) the Source or First-Cause of creation, the Intelligent Reason issued forth from G-D the Father taking on personhood; and that is why He has pre-eminence: because - "in Him, life was; and the Life was the Light of men. All things were made by Him. And without Him, was not made any (thing) that was made." (John 1:4,3).        In John 1:3, using the word "ginomai" (the Greek verb which means "to become"), we are informed that it is through the Logos (of John 1:1) that: "all things through Him CAME INTO BEING (egeneto) and without Him CAME INTO BEING (egeneto) not even one (thing) that CAME INTO BEING (gegonen)." Ginomai in the aorist is egeneto...referring back in Time to a point when the "beginning" or "New State" was occurring or still unfolding into existence. That is, it had now been made manifest as that creatio ex nihilo (that which was created from nothing), yet made sure and called "good"; but was still being made "complete".  You might liken it to watching a blade breaking ground, and growing and growing; then budding, and finally blooming as the flower opens to its fulness and beauty. After the aorist, we move from egeneto to gegone...the perfect tense of ginomai.   Gegone speaks of the continuing existence of this Beginning is dependant upon the Logos of John 1:1. That is,  "He stretcheth out the north over the empty place, and hangeth the earth upon nothing." (Job 26:7)    The hanging of the earth and all existence, is continually upheld by the Logos of G-D the Father -- His Intelligent Word, whom is Christ Jesus-- and the power of His will, the same will as that of the Father.  Hence Jesus and the Father are One (united in Complex Unity) / echad (John 10:30), therefore Jesus rightly receives worship as G-D our Savior from G-D the Father.  Amen.

Wake up, America. Obama openly commits Treason and Congress is just stringing along because of Political Correctness rather than upholding and enforcing the Laws of the US Constitution

US Constitution, Article 2, Section 4. The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors. 

http://www.earlyamerica.com/earlyamerica/freedom/constitution/text.html

Retired General Vallely states that he personally knows several CIA analysts who confirmed to him personally that Barack Hussein Obama's Certification of Live Births are indisputably FORGERIES:
 


He also states that privately, Congress will refuse to stand up to Obama for fear of having the Black Populations of America riot and go nuts if Obama is proven a fraud and impeached (or words to this effect).


 Then there is the fact that Obama has committed Social Security Number fraud, even to the illegally having of multiple Social Security names (beyond any one correction that we can allow for a spelling of the primary  name(s)  typo correction in fairness) for the same number and home address, as well as multiple Social Security numbers. That scandalous information began with a simple background check / vetting of Obama's alleged and now known factually to be Identity Theft and assumed Social Security Number that the Department of Justice under the Bush Administration FAILED to do as part of their responsibility.  The first red flag would have been a pull up like what Susan Daniel's extracted.

Affidavit Regarding Obamas Social Security Numbers - Susan Daniels

But I guess, if someone is "black" and "Leftist", somehow it is "racist" to expect a "required National Security Background Check" to be faithfully and fully executed as one would expect an opposing attorney to dig into the background, regardless of race, color, creed, religion, or sexual persuasion (Obama being an alleged  former bi-sexual while Illinois State senator if various Media reports are to be believed).  His actions to adamantly make the US military into a doo-dah parade exhibition of open homosexuals, even just on it appearance (see "repeal law" details at the white house link below), lends credence to such Media reports.  No true Bible believing Christian can support homosexuality because it is a sin of absolute damnation of that person's soul to Hell.

Then we have the breaking of US laws by Obama and Holder to  order US Law Enforcement through channels to allow a US to Mexico gun smuggling
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1363293/U-S-Justice-Department-ordered-ATF-allow-guns-cross-border-Mexico-used-kill-American-agents.html
http://cnsnews.com/news/article/atf-gun-tracking-probe-approved-highest
to arm Mexican gangs
[and Hezbollah Muslims
http://actforamericaomaha.com/not-just-drug-smuggling-some-mexican-drug-cartels-smuggle-aliens-from-countries-with-ties-to-terrorism/
http://actforamericahouston.wordpress.com/2011/05/05/hizballah-setting-up-operations-in-mexico-near-border/   ] contrary to current US Code / US laws.  

States CBS news: "it turns out ATF not only allowed it - they videotaped it."

 http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2011/03/03/eveningnews/main20039031.shtml#ixzz1PpouFvrw

Even worse, Obama is acting, right now, in the giving away of our nuclear secrets to Russia (and wanting funding to do so in Section 1228 of the Defense Budget bill) to make their up close and personal spectator event a reality.  Read the White House Document for yourself at this link, and save a pdf copy for future reference.

http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/legislative/sap/112/saphr1540r_20110524.pdf

Limitation on Funds to Provide Russian Federation with Access to U.S. Missile Defense Technology and International Agreements Relating to Missile Defense:
The Administration strongly objects to the following two sections: (1) section 1228 would prohibit the provision to the Russian Federation of a range of missile defense data...

Key words: Provide Russian Federation with...U.S. Missile Defense Technology and...a range of missile DEFENSE data.
A fully public Impeachment Trial on television, focusing on the Obama document and identity frauds, and the giving away (or even the stating of such intent to the giving away) of the most vital nuclear weapons secrets to Russia (compromising the security of the United States)  is all that is needed to Impeach Obama.

Meanwhile, the Liberal Traitors  in Congress will probably do the Ziggy, singing White Light /White Heat


- while they are pining and longing for the sight of the nuclear blast and the true destruction of America, as if they are some spectators watching it happen "to others" on the sidelines, cheering the blasts on.  That is their mental deficiency / insanity, and it isn't always a party or drug-induced attitude..it is a living mental and spiritual sickness which is a part of their very existence in how they live, breathe, think, and insanely believe.   While they chant or cheer the death to America garbage, Obama is acting, right now, in the giving away of our nuclear secrets (and wanting funding to do so in Section 1228 of the Defense Budget bill) to make their up close and personal spectator event a reality.


http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/omb/legislative/sap/112/saphr1540r_20110524.pdf

Limitation on Funds to Provide Russian Federation with Access to U.S. Missile Defense Technology and International Agreements Relating to Missile Defense:
The Administration strongly objects to the following two sections: (1) section 1228 would prohibit the provision to the Russian Federation of a range of missile defense data...

Key words: Provide Russian Federation with...U.S. Missile Defense Technology and...a range of missile DEFENSE data.


Anyone in Congress bother to actually read an open confession of acts of TREASON by Obama and accept their actions and behaviors against the Republic of the United States for what they are?  So what would you rather have  A throwback to some of the 1960s style kind of riots or total annihilation, thanks to Obama?  Well?

Clearly Congress would rather have the Russians incapacitate and nuke America out of existence, rather than suffer the "pooh, pooh" humiliation of being called a few names, and watching local and State Governments in a few dozen places combat the Communists, Anarchists, and racial bigots in the African-American Community refusing to simply be labeled as Americans like the rest of us (while demanding special privileges based on their skin color). 

 So America, this is what Congress, your Congress (filled with some 70 Communist-Socialists controlling the talking points agenda), and others (like cry, cry, cry Speaker of the House Boehner)  would rather have happen than to Impeach Obama on Identity Fraud (i.e., his forged COLBs and stolen Social Security numbers) and overt acts of Treason.









OF THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION  WE CAN QUOTE THESE SCRIPTURES:

Isaiah 59:
2  But your iniquities have separated between you and your GOD, and your sins have hid his face from you, that he will not hear.
3  For your hands are defiled with blood, and your fingers with iniquity; your lips have spoken lies, your tongue hath muttered perverseness.
4  None calleth for justice, nor any pleadeth for truth: they trust in vanity, and speak lies; they conceive mischief, and bring forth iniquity.

Thomas Jefferson once swore "eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man" in his letter to Benjamin Rush on September 23, 1800.  Even of a legal and peaceful philosophical and inward form of personal character application of this attitude, perhaps the notion of Liberty and freedom from destruction and victimization  is somehow now relegated as being antiquated.  Perhaps the Jews of the Holocaust who perished felt the same way, and only the survivors realized that people like Thomas Jefferson in his above quote were perhaps onto something?

Wake up, America.   

CIA Chief Leon Panetta, a de facto US Turncoat to Communist Spy exposed by Cliff Kincaid and Trevor Loudon. Wishes to help Obama give away most sensitive nuke secrets?

What will it ever take to persuade the US Senate to Act and Impeach Barack Hussein Obama II and Leon Panetta for Treason against the United States of America?  

Since the removal of the clumsy Senator McCarthy, the Communist-Socialists have gained so much ground in the House of Representatives and the US Senate, that they virtually run Congress by threats, manipulations, intimidations, shut-downs and what have you.

In the time of Jesus Christ, it took only 23 members of the Sanhedrin (enough to make a lesser Sanhedrin - a Sanhedrin Katan) and a corrupt high priest to destroy the nation of Israel and over throw Justice and equity, and let terror reign and be applied upon their own kindred by terrorists of the same kindred (i.e., not Romans, but Jews killing Jews themselves).  These terrorist bands controlled by the lesser Sanhedrin (able to give out the death penalty a will) and by the high priest, held even the Holy Place of the Temple with such unbelief and disdain, they murdered even between the doors of the Holy Place and the altar just outside its doors (in a holy place only purified and sanctified priests were supposed to be allowed).  Barabbas, who was chosen over Jesus by that same Sanhedrin Katan (and manipulated the masses to agree), was one of these evil Sicarii murderers. But what was important for leverage, was that perhaps 5 of the 7 elders of Israel (the exceptions being Nicodemus, chief rabbi of Eretz Israel, and Joseph of Arimathea, from less than 12 miles north of Jerusalem) were also part of the corrupted Sanhedrin Katan that ensured that the innocent and just  Jesus/Yeshua was crucified and slain, being Himself first in line to the Throne of David.  .

In our day, we had the most evil and corrupt Congress in the history of the United States under Nancy Pelosi, the 111th Congress.  There are more than just the 70 known Socialists and Socialist-Communists in Congress, there are players whose Communist affiliations we suspect but only after it is seemingly too late, are they made known.

The corruption and lack of Judeo-Christian Conservative fundamentalism and the lack of a moral back-bone and character has once again been proven but the majority in the 112th, though there are exceptions (as with Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus in AD 30 in Israel).

But still, it seems that overall, the inability, the  intentional inability of the 112th Congress to stand up to an illegal and corrupt and Treasonous Obama, now makes the 112th Congress the second most evil coming up fast to the 1st most corrupt.

  If the 112th Congress allows a nuclear secrets to the Russians suicide, and vets a now known Communist Agent in the person of Leon Panetta rather than demanding his and Obama's Impeachment and Removal, then by allowing national genocide and aiding and abetting that genocide, what would you call it?

If the 112th Congress ignores Obama's illegal Presidency, Document and Identity Fraud, and open Treason to destroy the USA, is that not a Criminal Negligence? 

Check out the links and the video.  There is a second very highest level Communist mole with Barack Obama in the person of Leon Panetta.  Valerie Jarrett is most likely Obama's most direct Communist handler...but who is Leon Panetta's?  Is there a Bill Clinton connection with Communism and betraying the USA...or did Bill Clinton NOT know?  Questions.  It is time the US Senate convenes and demands answers.

http://trevorloudon.com/2011/06/panetta-hearing-for-secdef-on-thursday-obama%E2%80%99s-cia-director-linked-to-spies-through-communist-party-figure/

http://trevorloudon.com/2011/06/will-the-senate-pick-anti-defense-cia-chief-with-red-ties-as-secdef-more-damaging-disclosures-about-leon-panetta/

http://trevorloudon.com/2011/06/panetta-report-1-leon-panetta-paid-tribute-to-two-longtime-communists/

Delacy Material examined by Loudon includes:
http://www.lib.washington.edu/specialcoll/findaids/docs/papersrecords/DeLacyHugh3915.xml

Cliff Kincaid notes w/ document examples:

 http://www.usasurvival.org/ck06.13.2011.html
http://www.usasurvival.org/ck06.14.2011.html

PDF.
http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/pannetta.pdf
 http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/ips-n-media.pdf
http://www.usasurvival.org/docs/amnmeips.pdf

Panetta had close relations with Communist spies, and smoking gun of his betrayal (i.e., his own Congressional Letterhead letters) demonstrate that Panetta has extremely likely  committed on-going Treason to the United States since 1981-1983.

If Panetta is placed as Secretary of Defense, it is almost a 100% certainty (it seems to me) that Obama will use Panetta to help denuclearize and destroy the United States by Panetta being the chief agent by which the US will simply hand over its most sensitive and advanced nuclear technologies and secrets (per Obama's instructions -- as illegal as those orders are)...
http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/06/while-obama-start-strips-usa-could-orly.htmlhttp://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/06/obama-america-betrayal-obama-upset.html

whether the US Congress funds him specifically to aid him in committing national USA genocide, or not.

The Obama America Betrayal: Obama upset Congress won't fund a giveaway of America's most intimate Nuclear Secrets to Russia!

Where are America's leaders and patriots?  Where is the OUTRAGE and righteous indignation at Obama's open and intentional Nuclear Secrets Betrayal?  Not even one Obama Administration senior official, not even one of these, has even a conscience to an overt act that clearly endangers the existence of America, themselves, their families, and every US Citizen they know? 

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2010/jun/16/inside-the-ring-382424672/



On June 16, 2010, The Washington Times under-reported the seriousness of the Obama America Betrayal:
"The Obama administration is secretly working with Russia to conclude an agreement that many officials fear will limit U.S. missile defenses...
the fact that the limit is contained in the treaty will provide the Russians with political leverage against the United States."

Uh, POLITICAL leverage? No, unique and specific MILITARY annihilation of the entirety of the United States of America leverage is more like it. But in spite of his plans, a pursuit of his felonious criminal actions in  Identity Theft and Identity Fraud could remove the traitor from power now.  But that means swallowing pride and admitting the "birthers" like Orly Taitz and others were right about the Obama Fraud all along.
 Cf.  http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/06/while-obama-start-strips-usa-could-orly.html


On June 7, 2011, it seems that at least  on the surface of the argument his article makes on the Obama wanting to give away the USA's most closely guarded nuclear secrets and be Congressionally Funded to do so, perhaps at least former CIA director R. James Woolsey finally realized Barack Obama intends to unilaterally strip the United States of its ability to defend or deter a nuclear attack from Russia (or any where else in the world allied with Russia)?

http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/06/07/giving_away_the_farm

Woolsey wrote: 

"...Barack Obama's administration recently threatened to veto the defense budget, citing "serious concerns" over provisions that limit the U.S. missile defense know-how that the White House is permitted to share with Moscow. This is the sort of information that Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin, in his earlier days, would have assigned his spies to steal. Through its single-minded pursuit of "resetting" relations with Russia, the Obama administration may simply be willing to hand over this information and, in doing so, weaken U.S. national security.
...
the provision that the president's team finds so offensive: Section 1228 requires that no funds can be used to provide the Russian Federation with sensitive U.S. missile defense technology."
 (emphasis mine)


"Weaken"?  By that one word, instead of "destroy"...well then, apparently Woolsey is unable to grasp the intense internal desire of Obama to destroy the USA made manifest in strategic political implementations that only a KGB mole who became President of the USA would do (perhaps because the Cold War allegedly ended)?  
You know, in the early 1980s, we had senior KGB defectors warn us that the end of the Cold war was coming, and it would just be an effort to lull the West (the USA) to sleep, and then the iron fist of the Soviet  striking its fatal blow.   Apparently, Woolsey never bothered to accept their words or books as credible.


 Perhaps Woolsey cannot bring himself to the reality of the Traitor and Fraud -- Barack Hussein Obama --  for fear that to resist the man because of skin color or whatever reason is so politically incorrect, that he must also be willing to go so far as to declare Obama to be on acting on the level of a religious fervor of a Jihadi Muslim, or someone who is clearly socio-pathically insane. 



How about calling Obama's US Nuclear Defense Secrets Betrayal for what it is...overt and clear undeniable TREASON against the republic and Citizens of the United States by Barack Hussein Obama II?

No.  Those who were entrusted with the highest National Security of this Nation's Intelligence, Military, and Defense secrets will go "uh, uh, uh" until the day the nukes rain down on the USA courtesy of Barack Hussein Obama II and friends.  And you think Benedict Arnold was a traitor?  He was a nobody compared to "Il Duce" / "the boss"  in the 2011 White House.

What else can you say about a man who says to America's enemies, "Here are the keys and means to annihilate 320,000,000 people -- almost guaranteed to be without a single nuclear repercussion."?  Talk about hating America's guts.

Talk about an insane America failing to rise up as one man and have Obama tried and convicted for overt / open-and-clearly-apparent TREASON against the United States, giving aid to America's enemies and conspiring to its destruction?

Has America's leaders gone psychedelic like in this below video?  Damn right they have.

YOU GOT SERVED! Orly Taitz has standing to pursue Obama Fraud Social Security Numbers, and advances Complaint with Judge Lamberth's permission

While the defense for Obama attempts to redact the evidence of Fraud, Orly Taitz pursues the case:

 ---------------------------------------------------

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE  DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Dr. ORLY TAITZ, ESQ, PRO SE                        §

                             Plaintiff,                         § Freedom of information violation

                                                                   §             5USC §552     

                   v.                                             §        CASE # 1:11-cv-00402   

                                                                   §   Assigned to Chief Judge

Michael Astrue, Commissioner of the            §             

     Social Security Administration,             §     Hon. Royce C. Lamberth

                                                                   § Designation: FOIA/Privacy Act

                                                                        §       

                                                                    §  Motion for Clarification

                                                                    §        

                    Respondent                                      §

NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION

Plaintiff Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ, hereinafter “Taitz” is submitting this motion for Clarification to be decided based on the memorandum of points and authorities attached herein and oral argument, if the court finds, that the oral argument is required.

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

Defendant filed  Motion to strike, requesting to seal the complaint, first amended complaint and all the exhibits or alternatively redact social security numbers.

Plaintiff thanks the court for  allowing the documents not to be sealed, and only requesting refilling with redaction. Plaintiff believes that this case is of the outmost National importance and sealing the complaint and the exhibits will deprive the public of their right to know the truth.

Plaintiff, however, is requesting clarification from the court and the defense, as to what do they want redacted, if anything. Clarification is needed for following reasons:

1. There is a requirement of redaction of VALID social security numbers. Individuals should have only one social security number.   

2. Affidavit of investigator Sankey, attached as an exhibit to the complaint, shows that national databases, such as Lexis Nexis and Choice Point, showed over a hundred bogus units of bogus social security numbers and addresses, which included some 39 different social security numbers, none of which were issued in HI, where Obama resided, when he started using a social security number.  As one individual is  supposed to have only one social security number,   and there are N numbers in the databases, it means that at least (N-1 ) numbers are not valid and do not need to be redacted or all N numbers are invalid and do not need to be redacted. There was high probability, that all 39 numbers are invalid, as none were issued in HI. Affidavits of investigator Susan Daniels and recently retired senior deportation officer of the Department of Homeland Security, John Sampson, confirm, that Obama could not possibly obtain Connecticut social security number, while residing in HI. (Exhibits to first amended complaint)

3. Searching through those numbers  Taitz found that Connecticut number 042-68-4425, is most commonly used.

4. Obama’s selective service certificate shows him using this number.( Exhibit 1)

5. Social Security Verification systems (Exhibit 2) shows, however, that this number 042-68-4425 was never issued to Obama. This means that none of the numbers used by Obama during his life and used today in the White House, are valid numbers . Those are either numbers, that were never assigned or numbers, that were assigned to deceased individuals, whose death was not reported to the Social Security administration. Mr. Obama’s lifelong friend, domestic terrorist William Ayers, aka Mr. “Guilty as sin, free as a bird”,   described in his memoirs, Fugitive Days, how he and his wife, Ms. domestic terrorist Bernadette Dohrn, searched through the cemeteries for graves of children, got their birth certificates and applied for the social security numbers under the names of the deceased. “After the Baltimore fiasco, stealing ID was forbidden. Instead we began to build ID sets around documents as flimsy as a fishing license or a laminated card available in a Times Square novelty shop called “Official ID.” We soon figured out that the deepest and most foolproof ID had a government-issued Social Security card at its heart, and the best source of those were dead-baby birth certificates. I spent impious days over the next several months tramping through rural cemeteries in Iowa and Wisconsin, Illinois and North Dakota, searching for those sad little markers of people born between 1940 and 1950 who had died between 1945 and 1955. The numbers were surprising:  two in one graveyard, a cluster of fourteen in another. Those poor souls had typically been issued birth certificates—available to us at any county courthouse for a couple of bucks and a simple form with information I could copy from the death announcement at the archive of the local paper—but they had never applied for a Social Security card.

Collecting those birth certificates became a small industry, and within a year we had over a hundred. For years I was a paper-made Joseph Brown, and then an Anthony Lee, remarkably durable identities. My on-paper official residences: a transient hotel in San Francisco and a warehouse in New York.” Bill Ayers, Fugitive Days. Ayers had a whole business of forged social security card making. It is unfortunate, that the person, occupying the position of the U.S. president, was using and is using a bogus social security number.

Clearly Mr. Obama cannot suffer any losses, due to his use of an invalid number, however there is a great benefit to the public at large, to ascertain the loopholes and malfunction within the Social Security Administration and make sure, that not only Mr. Obama is ultimately prosecuted, but also to make sure, that proper measures are taken to prevent such occurrence in the future.     Great public interest and great significance of this most important matter of the national security outweigh minor inconveniences for the defendant commissioner of the Social Security administration and for Mr. Obama.

6. Since NONE of the numbers used by Mr. Obama represent a valid social security number, assigned to him, Taitz needs clarification from the court and the defendant, commissioner of the Social Security Administration, what exactly do they want her to redact? Do they want her to redact numerical gibberish, numbers that are invalid and were never assigned or the numbers, that were stolen from the deceased individuals? Please advise.

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Dr. Orly Taitz, ESQ

29839 Santa Margarita Pkwy, ste 100

Rancho Santa Margarita CA 92688

....

Service of process

I certify that a true and correct copy of the above  was served on 06.06.2011 on:

Us Attorney -District of Columbia

555 4th street NW

Washington DC 20530

(being served by ECF)

cc Congressman Darrell Issa

Chairman

House Oversight Committee

2347 Rayburn House Building

Washington DC, 20515

cc Congressman Mike Rogers

Chairman

House Intelligence Committee

133 Cannon House Office building

Washington DC 20515

cc Congressman Sam Johnson

Chairman

House Subcommittee on Social Security

House Ways and Means Committee

2929 N Central Expy, 240

Richardson, TX 75080

cc Congressman Dana Rohrbacher

Chairman

House Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations’

House Committee on Foreign Affairs

2300 Rayburn House Building

Washington DC 20515

------------------------------------------------------------------------

I would recommend a highly aggressive pursuit tactic that takes the offense against the Obama  Attorneys on a whole new level, and challenge their averments, concealments, refusal to disclose, and  how they attempt and do defraud the Court and for an opener cite:

“Fraud on the court is conduct: 

1) on the part of an officer of the court; 

2) that is directed to the judicial machinery itself; 

3) that is intentionally false, willfully blind to the truth, or is in reckless disregard for the truth; 

4) that is a positive averment or a concealment when one is under a duty to disclose; 

5) that deceives the court.”  

Workman v. Bell, 245 F.3d 849 (6th Cir. 2001) @852

"The burden of establishing a delegation of power 

to the United States,

or the prohibition of power to the States, 

is upon those making the claim."

Bute v. Illinois, 333 U.S. 640  @653 (1948)

Part of that burden is proof of identity that they are who they say they are, and that they met the requirements subject to the job for which they have applied.

Obama must cough up genuine identity papers as well as prove he is a United States Natural Born Citizen

"No Person except a Natural Born Citizen..shall be eligible to the Office of President...."
US Constitution: Article 2, section 1, Clause 5

when challenged.  That is part of the ruling we can demand be applied from Bute v. Illinois, 333 U.S. 640 (1948) @ 653 regarding the burden of a US President fulfilling a burden of establishing his "right" to delegate power by the Constitution of the United States and the alleged "authority vested in" him that he claims on every Executive Order he signs, etc..

One document he needs to cough up is a valid Birth Certificate with WITNESSES to the Birth.

“The mother's relation is verifiable from the birth itself and is documented by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses to the birth.”
" In the case of the mother, the relation is verifiable from the birth itself. The mother's status is documented in most instances by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses who attest to her having given birth.”
Nguyen v. INS, 533 US 53 @54,62 (1948)

Another for those born 1961,  is a valid Selective Service Form with a Valid Social Security Card and Number filled out before he reached the age of 26 years old.  

Obama is using an Identity Theft Stolen Social Security Number on his Selective Service Form, thus violating the Selective Service Registration Law through Identity Fraud and disqualifying him for office...on top of his NOT being a US Natural Born Citizen (lacking a US Citizen Father, regardless of race, color, or creed).  

It is a legal fact that Natural Born Citizenship is required to be a US President, which Obama does NOT have... 

NOT having the even the proper US Citizenship Credentials to produce into evidence in a COURT of Law,

and especially by NOT BEING a UNITED STATES NATURAL BORN CITIZEN by the same principles of primogeniture and entail in regard to a sole US Citizenship (i.e., because he has NO US Citizen Father to Naturally take the place in Society of). Hence, he is a Usurper of the US Presidency, and an active criminal regularly committing felonies every time he acts or speaks in the fraudulently obtained office of the US Presidency.

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[Updated and re-edited Open letter to the Mainstream Media 06/07/2011]

 Open Letter to the Mainstream Media and Obama defenders, from Brianroy:

YOU have  run away in denial or acted as co-accessories to felony fraud after the fact on Constitutionalism where Barack Hussein Obama II is concerned. The Founders and early Supreme Court by contrast to you and Jay in practice toward Obama, called for Originalism in Constitutional Interpretation.  [1]

Firstly, Barack was born with a foreign citizenship via his father, and retained such until his 23^rd birthday. I will address his NOT being a United States qualified President by addressing this issue, but not near as at length as it deserves.

 Secondly, he has used by identity theft a stolen Connecticut Social Security Number.  I will leave off this second aspect, but for

http://www.theobamafile.com/_images/imgSocSecCmnt.jpg

http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2010/10/greta-van-susteren-and-others-in-media.html

 in order to make my response more brief. 

 I say that as in a Court of Law we also must weigh the facts, and make a decision to stand up for righteousness and truth. 

Barack Hussein Obama II was born a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies via his British Passport carrying father, regardless of where he was geographically born, [2]   --  and hence by his citizenship at birth -- regardless of where he was born -- is neither a "natural born citizen" of the United States per Article 2.1.5 (formerly 2.1.4), nor 14th Amendment qualified under Section 1 of that Amendment. 

“…at the time of his birth, Barack Obama Jr. was

both a U.S. citizen (by virtue of being born in Hawaii) and

a citizen of the United Kingdom and Colonies (or the UKC)

by virtue of being born to a father who was a citizen of the UKC.”
http://www.factcheck.org/askfactcheck/does_barack_obama_have_kenyan_citizenship.html

"...the term ‘natural born citizen’ is used and excludes all persons owing allegiance by birth to foreign states.”

The New Englander and Yale Law Review, Volume 3 (1845), p. 414
http://books.google.com/books?id=gGNJAAAAMAAJ&pg=PA414&dq=Vattel+%2B%22natural+born+citizen%22&as_brr=4&cd=5#v=onepage&q=Vattel%20%20%22natural%20born%20citizen%22&f=false      

On July 28, 1868, a mandatory state residency and sole allegiance to the United States was specified as a requirement in the US Constitution by the ratification of the 14^th Amendment. 

John Bingham, author of the 14th Amendment, The Congressional Globe (containing the debates and proceedings of) the 2nd Session of the 37th Congress in 1862, on page 1639,  [3]  states:

 “All from other lands, who by the terms of [congressional] laws and a compliance with their provisions become naturalized, are adopted citizens of the United States; all other persons born within the Republic, of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty, are natural born citizens. Gentleman can find no exception to this statement touching natural-born citizens except what is said in the Constitution relating to Indians.”

Then in 1866, Representative Bingham also stated on the House floor:

“Every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.” 

So states Representative Bingham in the Congressional Globe (containing the debates and proceedings of) the 1st Session of the 39th Congress, March 9, 1866

"The main object of the opening sentence of the fourteenth amendment was...to put it beyond doubt that all persons, white or black, and whether formerly slaves or not, born or naturalized in the United States, and OWING NO ALLEGIANCE TO ANY ALIEN POWER, should be citizens of the United States and of the state in which they reside."
"It is also worthy of remark that the language used about the same time by the very Congress which framed the Fourteenth Amendment, in the first section of the Civil Rights Act of April 9, 1866, declaring who shall be citizens of the United States, is "all persons born in the United States, and not subject to any foreign power, excluding Indians not taxed." 14 Stat. 27; Rev.Stat. § 1992."

Elk v. Wilkins, 112 US 94 (1884) @ 101-102, 103

The American Legal Review issue of Sep/Oct 1884 was the same one in which Democratic lawyer George D. Collins (the same who co-prosecuted the Wong Kim Ark landmark citizenship case of 1898) stated that in order to be “natural born” of a particular citizenship, such as the United States, “that his father be at the time of the birth of such a person a citizen thereof”.

 George D. Collins asked the question: “are persons born within the United States, whose fathers at the time of birth were aliens, citizens thereof?”
Collins cited Vattel in probing for the answer, and while he quoted  "The native or natural citizens are born in the country of PARENTS who are citizens"  [4] he also mined that "The country of the father is therefore that of the children, and these become true citizens merely by their tacit consent."

His answer at the end of the article:
“Birth, therefore, does not ipso facto confer citizenship, and is essential in order that a person be a native or natural born citizen of the United States, that his father be at the time of the birth of such person a citizen thereof, or in the case he be illegitimate, that his mother be a citizen thereof at the time of such birth. – GEORGE  D. COLLINS, SAN FRANCISCO, CAL.”
http://www.scribd.com/doc/19071886/Are-Persons-Born-Within-the-United-States-Ipso-Facto-Citizens-Thereof-George-D-Collins  

Obama as a British Citizen through inheritance by his father who married and legitimized him with a marriage to the minor Ann Dunham on February 2, 1961,  owed allegiance AT BIRTH to foreign lands…allegedly to both the United Kingdom (Great Britain) and Kenya at birth, regardless if he was born in the US or not.  Only by complete dishonesty can anyone label the man a US constitutionally qualified occupant of the Presidency. 


US v. Wong Kim Ark from 1898...Obama isn't even 14th Amendment qualified per Wong Kim Ark Standards
http://supreme.justia.com/us/169/649/case.html

Specifics of Wong Kim Ark refute / disqualify Obama:

1)     @ 169 US 652, Wong Kim Ark (WKA) was born and reared in one permanent residence in California,  “and never lost nor changed  that residence."               

 

2)       @ 169 US 652 – 653   “neither he nor his parents acting for him ever renounced his allegiance to the United States, or did or committed any act or thing to exclude him

Page 169 U. S. 653  therefrom.”

3)      @ 169 US 654, we are told that he temporarily left the United States at age 17 to visit China, and returned in the same calendar year.  WKA was admitted in by Customs as a native-born citizen of the United States.

4)      @ 169 US 654, although both parents were resident aliens in the United States, they kept and maintained a permanent residence and domicile for WKA to be born in and spend his first 21 years of life in, until he became of age at 21.

5)      @169 US 654, the resident alien parents were employed, “and there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China…”    

6)      @ 169 US 654, it was immediately recognized that WKA appeared to have immediately qualified as a US Citizen under the 14^th Amendment Section 1’s “all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States."     

7)      @ 169 US 705, the conclusion was: “ The evident intention, and the necessary effect, of the submission of this case to the decision of the court upon the facts agreed by the parties were to present for determination the single question stated at the beginning of this opinion, namely, whether a child born in the United States, of parent of Chinese descent, who, at the time of his birth, are subjects of the Emperor of China, but have a permanent domicil and residence in the United States, and are there carrying on business, and are not employed in any diplomatic or official capacity under the Emperor of China, becomes at the time of his birth a citizen of the United States. For the reasons above stated, this court is of opinion that the question must be answered in the affirmative.”

Conclusion drawn from WKA:   

The Court concluded by majority that WKA was a citizen of the United States under the criteria of the 14^th Amendment because –

1)      Wong Kim Ark was born in the United States.

    Wong Kim Ark never renounced US Allegiance, nor did his parents do so for him. 

2)      Wong Kim Ark was maintained in a permanent US State domicile every year of his life as his primary residence from birth to age 21.

3)      Neither of his parents were employed in either a diplomatic or in ANY OFFICIAL capacity at the time of WKA’s birth. 

Barack fails the WKA test: 


By comparison, Barack Obama has never proved he was USA born.  He refuses to submit a hard copy into Court record under penalty of perjury, etc.


By comparison, Barack Obama had his allegiance renounced by swearing fealty to the Indonesian flag daily in Menteng - 1 in Jakarta Indonesia, being an adopted Indonesian Citizen where the step-father took him to the renunciation of all other allegiances, including the United States, to the consent of the mother.


By comparison, Barack as Barry Soetoro (Soebarkah) -- his adopted and legal name in Indonesia -- had 4 years residence in Indonesia, and would visit Hawaii and stay temporarily for up to 3 weeks at a time, and attend Elementary School as a visitor pending his removal and return after his mother finished vacationing in Hawaii with her parents.   The primary residence of the mother was with her husband in Indonesia, and the primary residence of the child was with his mother.  Hence, there was no permanence of a US Domicile at any time for Barry Soetoro / Barack Obama until he was about age 10 or 11 and moved in with his grandparents at that time.


Obama's Mother declares Obama Jr. lost his US Citizenship as of August 13, 1968


Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro-Passport Application File-Strunk v Dept of State-FOIA Release-FINAL-7-29-10
The above passport file information on Barack Hussein Obama II's mother reveals that  
Barack Hussein Obama II 
has NO 14th Amendment US Citizenship,
and de facto, 
was sworn under signed oath by his Mom
to no longer be a Citizen of the United States
as of August 13, 1968!!!


The immediate form following the opening letter has the mother sign under oath on the back page of  Form FS-299 of 7-64.


Following the instructions:
"I have not (and no other person included or to be included in the passport or documentation has), since acquiring United States citizenship, been naturalized as a citizen of a foreign state, taken an oath or made an affirmation or other formal declaration of allegiance to a foreign state; entered or served in the armed forces of a foreign state, accepted or performed the duties of any office, post, or employment under the government of a foreign state or political subdivisions thereof; voted in a political election in a foreign state or participated in an election or plebiscite to determine the sovereignty over foreign territory, made a formal renunciation of nationality either in the United States or before a diplomatic or consular officer of the United States in a foreign state; ever sought or claimed the benefits of the nationality of any foreign state; or been convicted by a court or court martial of competent jurisdiction of committing any act of treason against, or attempting by force to overthrow, or bearing arms against, the United States, or conspiring to overthrow, put down or to destroy by force , the Government of the United States.


{If any of the above-mentioned acts or conditions have been performed by or apply to the applicant, or to any other person included in the passport or documentation, the portion of which applies should be struck out , and a supplementary explanatory statement  under oath (or affirmation) by the person to whom the portion is applicable should be attached and made a part of this application.}


Ann Dunham wrote Barack Hussein Obama (Soebarkah) and struck his name out to indicate that he was legally to no longer be a United States Citizen, and the document stood to apply all relevant passages that could apply to a 7 year old who lost US Citizenship by naturalization to Indonesia with a renunciation of his allegiance and renunciation of his citizenship by both he and his mother and his step-father for him. 


Again, his own mother on August 13, 1968, before a Department of State consulate, denounced her son Barack Hussein Obama  as having foreign allegiances and foreign naturalization to Indonesia, and signed to this effect in form FS-277, writing and striking his name out.  

  Ipso facto and de jure, Barack Obama II is not legally President of the United States in the eyes of the US Constitution because he was born a British Citizen,
and his entire occupancy in the White House is therefore legally voidable.  [5]

We are at a Rhineland vulnerability Apex in history when Obama is still stoppable in the US Supreme Court, but that window is closing very fast.  

I say it is a moral duty to act within the choice that the Law still allows us, to follow righteousness and truth, and that we follow the advice of the US Supreme Court and VOID OUT Obama's entire Presidency. 

 

Please respectfully and diligently research the issue.  I am hopeful that a thorough and honest examination will yield the same requirement to motivate those who would HONESTLY and without bias, with the same demeanor and refusal a person on the jury must have when judging a case on the facts of the Law (and NOT the color of skin or personal prejudice) will result in many of you realizing that you too must stand up now, and challenge an illegal Obama Presidency.   Thank you.

 [1]  Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U. S. 1 (1824) @ 188-189
http://supreme.justia.com/us/22/1/case.html

states:
" ...the enlightened patriots who framed our Constitution, and the people who adopted it, must be understood to have employed words in their natural sense, and to have intended what they have said. If, from the imperfection of human language, there should be serious doubts respecting the extent of any given power, it is a well settled rule that the objects for which it was given, especially when those objects are expressed in the instrument itself, should have great influence in the construction."

Thomas Jefferson, in his letter to William Johnson, dated June 12, 1823 from Monticello, wrote:
"On every question of construction [of the Constitution] let us carry ourselves back to the time when the Constitution was adopted, recollect the spirit manifested in the debates, and instead of trying what meaning may be squeezed out of the text, or intended against it, conform to the probable one in which it was passed."

Holmes v. Jennison, 39 U.S. (14 Peters) 540 (1840)@ 570-571
http://supreme.justia.com/us/39/540/case.html

“In expounding the Constitution of the United States, every word must have its due force and appropriate meaning, for it is evident from the whole instrument that no word was unnecessarily used or needlessly added. The many discussions which have taken place upon the construction of the Constitution have proved the correctness of this proposition and shown the high talent, the caution, and the foresight of the illustrious men who framed it. Every word appears to have been weighed with the utmost deliberation, and its force and effect to have been fully understood. No word in the instrument, therefore, can be rejected as superfluous or unmeaning, and this principle of construction applies …”

[2]   Elk v. Wilkins, 112 U.S. 94 (1884) @102
http://supreme.justia.com/us/112/94/case.html

“…in a geographical sense born in the United States, are no more "born in the United States and subject to the jurisdiction thereof," within the meaning of the first section of the Fourteenth Amendment, than the children of subjects of any foreign government born within the domain of that government….”

[3]     http://memory.loc.gov/ll/llcg/059/0600/06811639.gif

[4]  see also:  

The Venus, 12 U.S. (8 Cranch) 253 (1814) @ 289-290
http://supreme.justia.com/us/12/253/case.html

- Chief Justice John Marshall stated:
The whole system of decisions applicable to this subject rests on the law of nations as its base. It is therefore of some importance to inquire how far the writers on that law consider the subjects of one power residing within the territory of another, as retaining their original character or partaking of the character of the nation in which they reside.

Vattel, who, though not very full to this point, is more explicit and more satisfactory on it than any other whose work has fallen into my hands, says
"The citizens are the members of the civil society; bound to this society by certain duties, and subject to its authority, they equally participate in its advantages.

The natives or indigenes
are those born in the country
of parents who are citizens.

Society not being able to subsist and to perpetuate itself but by the children of the citizens, those children naturally follow the condition of their fathers, and succeed to all their rights."

[5] 

“Where a statute is defective because of under-inclusion there exist two remedial alternatives:

a court may either declare it a nullity

and order that its benefits not extend to the class the legislation was intended to benefit, 

or 

it may extend the coverage of the statute to include those who are aggrieved by exclusion.”  

 Welsh v. United States, 398 US 333 (1970) @ 361

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803)@180 

http://supreme.justia.com/us/5/137/case.html 

states that  “a law repugnant to the constitution IS VOID. . . .” 

and  “in declaring what  shall be the SUPREME law of the land,

the CONSTITUTION itself is first mentioned; 

and not the laws of the United States generally, 

but those only which shall be made in PURSUANCE of the constitution,

have that rank.”

If Obama’s Presidency is NOT in pursuance to the US Constitution, so also are all laws and enactments of his VOIDABLE.