Hillary Clinton, A Tale of Two Hillary Clinton's By A Tale Of Two Noses Showing Two Different People? No One Is Asking What they Should.

I would like to ask the questions that no one else is asking, but should. And whether it seems nonsensical at the first, bear with me…and you will perhaps soon be questioning if Hillary of the September 26, 2016 debate with Donald Trump is Hillary, or an old Central Intelligence Agency counterpart playing an old, old role as her double.

Is Hillary Clinton really the Hillary Clinton who was actually the First lady and then the Secretary of State in 2012? Is Hillary someone who is supposed to have blue eyes or not?
Is there a lighting trick that turns her eyes brown on video, on old non-high def and non-computer algorithm manipulated television sets?

Is Hillary blue eyed in the photo or Hazel (brown and blue tendencies) or just brown eyed?

Does Hillary have a magical plastic surgery that relapses and is restored daily, be it her neck, her face wrinkles, and what kind of cream or makeup can "poof" alter her dramatically, or are we so accustomed to a body double (be it a non-relative, a kid sister, or whomever) that we have forgotten what Hillary 2012 and before actually looks like and was degenerating into?

Can Hillary PROVE she is Hillary Rodham-Clinton by all of the ff. - a height and natural eye color check, and by a DNA and fingerprint match if so required?

Hillary Clinton has BLUE EYES.

http://www.heightcelebs.com/2013/11/hillary-rodham-clinton/

Height: 5ft 6in ( 1.68m )
First Name: Hillary
Middle Name: Rodham
Last Name: Clinton
Maiden Name: Rodham
Birth Full Name: Hillary Diane Rodham Clinton
Birthplace: Chicago, Illinois
Build: Average
Eye Color: Blue
Hair Color: Blonde

Re: 
http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/06/hillary_clintons_eyes.html

https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/750300510264107008/G8-PA5KA_400x400.jpg


What color were her eyes at the September 26 debate with Donald and in most of her appearances?

Does she suddenly alternate from tighter jowels and a smother neck to heavy jowels (woof!) and a heavily wrinkled neck from 2014 onward, especially in 2015-2016 or not?

As I look at Hillary, something looks wrong with this Hillary at the 2016 debate with the Ben Ghazi morning after “I have a Hangover” Hillary.
September 12, 2012 - Indeed, Hillary looks like she had a MASSIVE hangover while Obama made her stand beside him as he LIED to all of us about Ben Ghazi.
 https://youtu.be/3Nu6VZ9DeVc


Not to mention it looks like she either has a NOSE job or we are being treated to someone not the same Hillary as Hillary Rodham-Clinton, who has been at it for years, is Hazel eyed instead of blue eyed, and has a smaller nose?
2013 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XpdTLF46BHM



2014 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWFMqUDy1gw



But wait, it gets worse, a spoof video critiquing Hillary's accent shows that from College, there has been a second Hillary?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCyvyyo6dtQ


Look at the noses beginning and end as consistent and DIFFERENT from the First Lady Hillary in the middle photos and the 2013, 2014 videos referenced above. A tale of TWO Hillary Clintons carried over from Hillary's days with the Central Intelligence Agency still on going?

-------------------------------------------

Update 10/06/2016 --  Correction Upon Further Inquiry And Investigation

I did some more checking into the ever changing face of Plastic Hillary, as a news story came along that NOW Hillary says she doesn't remember saying that she wants to drone strike Julian Assange.

http://www.infowars.com/clinton-i-dont-recall-joking-about-droning-julian-assange/

http://www.shtfplan.com/headline-news/not-just-assange-hillary-wants-to-drone-strike-all-dissidents-and-whistleblowers_10042016

Well, that request of hers was declared by Hillary herself on Tuesday, November 23, 2010, 

when Hillary asked

 “Can’t we just drone this guy?”

  Hillary doesn’t remember saying and pushing such things as calls for open assassinations by means of drone strikes.  Uh huh.  She wouldn't. She's had way too many face altering plastic surgeries that so altered her face, that the only way to tell it still might be her is by her upper front teeth.   What she has done to her nose through the decades in pictures is just one example, and who knows if she had infections on the brain and permanent plastic surgery complications from all the face alterations through the years. By example, you can see the changes 

http://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/portrait-of-president-bill-clinton-daughter-chelsea-wife-news-photo/92925144#portrait-of-president-bill-clinton-daughter-chelsea-wife-hillary-picture-id92925144

http://www.ibtimes.com/hillary-clinton-young-photos-17-vintage-pictures-showing-democratic-nominee-2395811

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/middleeast/syria/8937317/Hillary-Clinton-to-meet-Syrian-opposition-leaders-in-Geneva.html

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/9822156/Hillary-Clinton-gives-angry-defence-of-her-handling-of-Benghazi-raid.html

and compare what Hillary USED to look like to what plastic surgery

 -- and realize her epilepsy and parkinsons may be so related by probable infections and tainted blood from her many blood transfusions (for all we know) since the 1980s -- 

has made her look like NOW by comparison. 

It has me many hundreds of photo examinations to realize and verify that the only way one would be able to forensically prove she isn't doubled is by her upper front teeth when she bares them in the photos. I have had some question regarding them, and perhaps this alone (a comparison of the upper front teeth when she smiles broadly) would distinguish her from any who would double her.

Lighting, and new technology which alters color and rewrites visual reality with special effects by this or that tinting or what have you, and her sometimes use  of dark contacts in place of glasses to attempt to defeat reactions to flashes and epileptic seizures which didn't work last summer, all these various things and more are deceptive to one degree or another. Also, we do not know if she has used half the amount of Botox treatments as Joe Biden with 10 times worse the physical and mental health side effects or what.

Hillary can't remember?
--"Um? Did I really order a nuclear strike on Russia and some of our European partners? Is that why the ICBMs are coming over the North Pole? Um? I don't remember!!!" -- Hillary would say. Uh huh.

Obama emasculates our nuclear arsenal where we count planes and launchers as nukes now, in that Treaty he made with Russia that top military retired general concur is EXACTLY how it reads, and we have how many nukes left that even work or can be delivered if a post January 2016 Hillary sets off say two or three dozen against the Russians following a John Kerry incompetence and Irish Republican Army wannabe Samantha Powers anarchist entrusted with Federal U.S. authority implementing a George Soros destruction of the USA lunatic policy which military commander yes-men would follow blindly because the ones who follow the Constitution or know what an unlawful order is have been too purged from the upper ranks of the various branches of the U.S. Military by Obama?

The same Obama who is de facto (not just de jure) a foreign usurper hat CANNOT prove birth identity and stated so in 1995 as an ATTORNEY was non-existent according to his searching Queen's hospital, Kapi'olani, the Bureau of Vital statistics or anywhere in Hawaii in 1995 – 

"You know, as soon as the Old Man died,
the lawyers contacted all those who might have a claim to the inheritance.
Unlike my mum,
Ruth
has all the documents needed to prove who Mark's father was."
Dreams from My Father, p. 345 Barack Obama
(confessing there is NO Birth Certificate of any kind for him ANYWHERE in Hawaii as of 1995).

Do we REALLY want to go there with a President Hillary or a President Kaine, who proved at the October 2016 VP debate that at times he is just as mentally and as emotionally unstable (in his own way) as also UNFIT for the VP slot, let alone as POTUS? Hell NO!!!

So I hereby make my correction that in most cases, there is doubt Hillary uses a double, especially when the upper front teeth are bared and can be visually compared as the same.  This doesn't mean a set of false teeth or a near relation couldn't be doubling on rare occasions...only that now we should know what first to look for, as a blue eyed Hillary won't always be blue eyed before the cameras and video, it seems.  

That's my update for now.  Peace.  

End of Update  October 06, 2016  

Hillary On Levodopa Gets Michael Savage Kicked Off The Air Due To Tantrum Fit For Being Exposed As Even More Dangerous While On The Drug?

     Democracy and socialism have nothing in common 

but one word, equality. 

But notice the difference: 

while democracy seeks equality in liberty,

 socialism seeks equality in restraint and servitude. 

---

America is great because she is good.

If America ceases to be good, America will cease to be great. 

----

The American Republic will endure until the day

Congress discovers that it can bribe the public with the public's money.

~Alexis de Tocqueville    

Michael Savage, here in September 2016, was  CENSORED FOR DISCUSSING PRESIDENTIAL POLITICS AND REVEALING THE SEVERE MEDICATION AND  "of the side effects of Levodopa, used for treating Parkinson’s"  HILLARY CLINTON IS TAKING.

http://www.breitbart.com/big-journalism/2016/09/26/exclusive-michael-savage-reacts-pulled-radio-pure-sabotage/ 

Furthermore, if she has any deviant proclivities, like personally murdering (such as alleged with Vincent Foster or ordering murders of others of which there are dozens alleged in the last 30 years for her to be involved in ordering done), if there is any proclivity to lie or enter compulsive behavior, the drug  Levodopa only intensifies these erratic compulsions and makes them worse.   Hillary frequently has wanted to start a war, even a nuclear war with Russia.  Hillary has overthrown Libya and given it to Al Qaeda / ISIS terrorists and laughed off not only killing Moammar Quadaffi as if she were Julius Caesar 2 in the “Veni, Vedi, Vici” quote (“I came, I saw, I conquered”) with her variant “We came, we saw.  He died!  Heah ha ha ha!”

—but she also applied that to her OWN ambassador Stevens and other innocent U.S. Citizens in U.S. Intelligence who died with Ambassador Stevens on 9/11/2012.  Who else does Hillary NOW and in the future have even MORE proclivity to kill and destroy and damn the consequences and anyone that even speaks up and points that out?  Hillary has been mentored by Grand Dragon of the Ku Klux Klan Senator Robert Byrd,  Devil Worshipper and Communist Anarchist Saul Alinsky,  and has often praised Genocidalist Margaret Sanger as her hero and role model.  So with these mentors and that kind of personal hero in her life that she wants to be twice the child of hell as, what would she NOW have the proclivity to do if she ever gets the Presidency of the United States?  Who would she demand a nuclear strike on?  Russia, a third world overpopulated country, or a Conservative city of the United States that dares believe that the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land  (U.S. Constitution, Article 6) and NOT Hillary?  

Never mind that Hillary would experience 

not just frequent nausea, light-headness, and confusion 

while on the drug; 

but that she will develop  “involuntary, erratic, writhing movements of the face, arms, legs, and/or trunk, which usually occur one to two hours after a dose of levodopa has been absorbed into the bloodstream and is having its peak clinical effect” according to those who specialize in Parkinson’s in talking about it, and by example the quote in red being from: http://www.parkinson.org/understanding-parkinsons/treatment/Medications-for-Motor-Symptoms/Carbidopa-levodopa

President Harry S Truman Jan. 20, 1949: 
“Communism is based on the belief that man is so weak and inadequate that he is unable to govern himself, and therefore requires the rule of strong masters.
Democracy is based on the conviction that man has the moral and intellectual capacity, as well as the inalienable right, to govern himself with reason and justice. …”

Hillary is a falling down epileptic with Parkinson's, a practicing Satanist and a felony murderess who has gotten away with at least 2 and likely 3 decades of her own alleged personal participation in sanctioning organized crime hits under color of authority and or connections with those who exercised that (including George Herbert Walker Bush while Vice President and President of the United States in the 1980s to his leaving office in January 20, 1993).  

Tomorrow the United Nations wants dominion of the Internet, but the United States Constitution, which is specifically for the dominion of United States soil and includes the Internet that traverses United States soil, is NOT subject to anything that violates the First Amendment.  

Under color of authority he does NOT have, even IF he were legal to be POTUS, which Obama is NOT, the United States Constitution allows us to IGNORE United Nations laws that illegally INFRINGE, SUBVERT, ATTEMPT TO OVERTHROW our RIGHTS by our Constitution.  So again, I let the U.S. Supreme Court say:

Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)@ 180

"... in declaring what shall be the supreme law of the land, the Constitution itself is first mentioned,
and not the laws of the United States generally,
but those only which shall be made in pursuance of the Constitution,
have that rank.
Thus, the particular phraseology of the Constitution of the United States confirms and strengthens the principle,
 supposed to be essential to all written Constitutions,
that a law repugnant to the Constitution is void, and that courts,
as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument."
Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) @ 491

"Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved,
 there can be no rulemaking or legislation which would abrogate them."

Abrogate:      Repeal or do away with (a law, right, or formal agreement):

repeal, revoke, rescind, repudiate, overturn, annul;

Law  disallow, cancel, invalidate, nullify, void, negate, dissolve, countermand, declare null and void, discontinue;    reverse, retract, remove, withdraw, abolish, put an end to, do away with, get rid of, end, stop, quash, scrap;

Law  disaffirm

Evade (a responsibility or duty):

Ex parte Siebold, 100 U.S. 371 (1879) @376 -377

“An unconstitutional law is void, and is as no law. 

An offence created by it is not a crime. 

A conviction under it is not merely erroneous, but is illegal and void, 

and cannot be a legal cause of imprisonment.”

Huntington v. Worthen, 120 U.S. 97 (1887) @101-102

“An unconstitutional act is not a law; it binds no one, and protects no one.”

Ogden v. Saunders, 25 U.S. 12 Wheat. 213 (1827) @ 322,

"The single question for consideration is whether the act ...is consistent with or repugnant to the Constitution of the United States?"

Ex parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 (1908) 159 - 160

The act to be enforced is alleged to be unconstitutional, and, if it be so...it is simply an illegal act upon the part of a State official in attempting, by the use of the name of the State, to enforce a legislative enactment which is void because unconstitutional. If the act which the state [official] ...seeks to enforce be a violation of the Federal Constitution, the officer, in proceeding under such enactment, comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, and he is, in that case, stripped of his official or representative character, and is subjected in his person to the consequences of his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States. See In re Ayers, supra, p. 123 U. S. 507.

Fletcher v. Peck, 10 U.S. (6 Cranch) 87 (1810)  @ 87

“The question whether a law is void for its repugnancy to the Constitution is at all times a question of much delicacy...   The Court, when impelled by duty to render such a judgment, would be unworthy of its station could it be unmindful of the solemn obligations which that station imposes.  … The opposition between the Constitution and the law should be such that the judge feels a clear and strong conviction of their incompatibility with each other.”

A.L.A. Schechter Poultry Corp. v. United States, 295 U.S. 495 (1935) @ 495, 528-29

@ 495  “Extraordinary conditions, such as an economic crisis, may call for extraordinary remedies, but they cannot create or enlarge constitutional power.”

@528    “Extraordinary conditions may call for extraordinary remedies. But the argument necessarily stops short of an attempt to justify action which lies outside the sphere of constitutional authority. Extraordinary conditions do not create or enlarge constitutional power.      [Case Footnote: See Ex parte Milligan, 4 Wall. 2, 71 U. S. 120, 71 U. S. 121; Home Building &; Loan Assn v. Blaisdell, 290 U. S. 398, 290 U. S. 426.  ]

 The Constitution established a national government with powers deemed to be adequate, as they have proved to be both in war and peace, but these powers of the national government are limited by the constitutional grants. Those who act under these grants are not at liberty to transcend the

Page 295 U. S. 529

imposed limits because they believe that more or different power is necessary. Such assertions of extraconstitutional authority were anticipated and precluded by the explicit terms of the Tenth Amendment --

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people." “

…Second. The question of the delegation of legislative power. We recently had occasion to review the pertinent decisions and the general principles which govern the determination of this question. Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan, 293 U. S. 388. The Constitution provides that

"All legislative powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives."

Art I, § 1. And the Congress is authorized "To make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution" its general powers. Art. I, 8, par. 18. The Congress is not permitted to abdicate or to transfer to others the essential legislative functions with which it is thus vested. “

Norton v. Shelby County, 118 U.S. 425 (1886) @442

 “…an unconstitutional act is not a law; it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it affords no protection; it creates no office; it is, in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it had never been passed.”

Williams v. Rhodes, 393 U.S. 23 (1968) @29

  “But the Constitution is filled with provisions that grant Congress or the States specific power to legislate in certain areas; these granted powers are always subject to the limitation that they may not be exercised in a way that violates other specific provisions of the Constitution.”

Poindexter v. Greenhow, 114 U.S. 270 (1885)  @ 290

"...the maxim that the King can do no wrong has no place in our system of government, yet it is also true, in respect to the state itself, that whatever wrong is attempted in its name is imputable to its government, and not to the state, for, as it can speak and act only by law, whatever it does say and do must be lawful. That which therefore is unlawful because made so by the supreme law, the Constitution of the United States, is not the word or deed of the state, but is the mere wrong and trespass of those individual persons who falsely speak and act in its name. "    

Ex Parte Milligan , 71 U. S. 2 (1866) @121

“…the President…is controlled by law, and has his appropriate sphere of duty, which is to execute, not to make, the laws; 

and there is "no unwritten criminal code to which resort can be had as a source of jurisdiction."

Myers v. United States, 272 U.S. 52 (1925) @177 (dissent)

“…MR. JUSTICE HOLMES, dissenting.

"… The duty of the President to see that the laws be executed is a duty that does not go beyond the laws 

or require him to achieve more than Congress sees fit to leave within his power.”

Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 413 U.S. 266 (1973) @ 272
"It is clear, of course, that no Act of Congress can authorize a violation of the Constitution."United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. 873 (1975) @ 877
"But "no Act of Congress can authorize a violation of the Constitution," Almeida-Sanchez, supra at 413 U. S. 272, "

Doe v. Braden, 57 U.S. (16 Howard) 635 (1853) @ 657

"By the Constitution of the United States, the President has the power, by and with the advice and consent of the Senate, to make treaties provided two-thirds of the Senators present concur. ... And the Constitution declares that all treaties made under the authority of the United States shall be the supreme law of the land. The treaty is therefore a law made by the proper authority, and the courts of justice have no right to annul or disregard any of its provisions unless they violate the Constitution of the United States."
The Cherokee Tobacco, 78 U.S. (11 Wallace) 616 (1870) @ 620

"The second section of the fourth article of the Constitution of the United States declares that
"This Constitution and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof, and all treaties which shall be made under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land."
It need hardly be said that a treaty cannot change the Constitution or be held valid if it be in violation of that instrument."
Geofroy v. Riggs, 133 U.S. 258 (1890) @ 267

"The treaty power, as expressed in the Constitution, is in terms unlimited except by those restraints which are found in that instrument against the action of the government or of its departments, and those arising from the nature of the government itself and of that of the states.
It would not be contended that it extends so far as to authorize what the Constitution forbids, or a change in the character of the government, or in that of one of the states, or a cession of any portion of the territory of the latter, without its consent." [Case citations omitted]
United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898) @ 701

". as will appear by tracing the history of the statutes, treaties and decisions upon that subject -- always bearing in mind that statutes enacted by Congress, as well as treaties made by the President and Senate, must yield to the paramount and supreme law of the Constitution."

State of Missouri v. Holland, 252 U.S. 416 (1920) @432-433

@ 432 "It is said that a treaty cannot be valid if it infringes the Constitution, that there are limits, therefore, to the treaty-making power, and that one such limit is that what an act of Congress could not do unaided, in derogation of the powers reserved to the States, a treaty cannot do.
@ 433 . Acts of Congress are the supreme law of the land only when made in pursuance of the Constitution...."

Asakura v. City of Seattle, 265 U.S. 332 (1924) @ 341

"A treaty made under the authority of the United States "shall be the supreme law of the land, and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding." Constitution, Art. VI, § 2.
The treaty-making power of the United States is not limited by any express provision of the Constitution, and, though it does not extend "so far as to authorize what the Constitution forbids..." [Case citations omitted]

United States v. Minnesota, 270 U.S. 181 (1926) @ 208 

"The decisions of this Court generally have regarded treaties as on much the same plane as acts of Congress, and as usually subject to the general limitations in the Constitution.."
Reid v. Covert, 354 U.S. 1 (1956)@ 17

"This Court has regularly and uniformly recognized the supremacy of the Constitution over a treaty."

   

"Trump will GO on the 26th!" Is Another Intelligence Agencies Assassination Announcement That They Will Take Out A U.S. Presidential Candidate? Video.

Hat Tip to Leo Donofrio.  

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3Fq_OYmLC3w&feature=youtu.be

"Trump will go 26th" WTF ? Sept. 20, 2016

 

Jet Wintzer

Published on Sep 20, 2016
So this weirdness just happened on our way to Hoboken at 7AM this morning on the New Jersey Turnpike. On 1630 AM radio, a voice keeps repeating "Trump will go 26th". It went on for at least 5 minutes from when the radio tuned it in while scanning. Near the Newark airport I78 part of Turnpike. Just landed in a Jason Bourne movie.


The most likely scenario involves the accidental downing of Trump's Jet with him on it.  There are many other scenarios, but hopefully the Treasury Department, Trump's Security Team, and Trump will take the initiative to make sure nothing happens.  

Democrat Presidential Candidate 2016 Has Full Epileptic Seizure, Physically Unfit To Run For And be POTUS

On September 11, 2016   Hillary Clinton Has Her 9/11 Experience To Her Campaign.  A Full Blown Epilepsy Seizure which paralyzes her buckling right leg even as she is standing up.  Had she not been supported, she would have been on the ground flopping like a fish.  Hillary Clinton is now BUSTED with video that she does have full blown incapacitating epileptic seizures, and it is clear that this has been an ongoing medical issue with her that will only degenerate and get worse.  








Dr. Ted Noel interviewed by Gary  Franchi diagnoses her epileptic seizures and coughing fits as Parkinsons disease related.





By example, Infowars especially,  has the the call for alrting the American Public as to Hillary's Health Issues.  For example, 



With epilepsy, like with Hillary's most recent (as of this article) seizure, there is a mostly full recovery after 20 - 25 minutes, and an appearance of normalcy for most epileptics in about 45 minutes. 

Parkinson's disease attacking the nervous system  ON TOP OF EPILEPSY is an added complication that fully disqualifies Hillary Clinton on medical issues alone...never mind she has committed dozens of acts of treason, is an accessory to many murders before and after the fact, supports America's enemies and sponsors terrorism, has helped sell U.S. Military secrets and names of agents and been directly complicit washed billions in bribes as a Secretary of State through the Clinton Foundation, etc.  

The new slogan we should all be saying now is: 

Hillary for a Prison Hospital 2016, and imprisoned for life...even if she croaks in under 6 months.  

True Illumination That The Illuminati Are Too Unintelligent To Grasp By Themselves - Our Eternal Life Is In Christ Jesus Alone

In Genesis 7:22 

All in whose nostrils was the breath of life, of all that was in the dry land, died.

there is the death of all who on land that "nishmat-ruach hayyim" / "breathed the breath of lives" , referring especially to the last word of the preceding verse in the  Hebrew ... "hadam" / "mankind".  

Nishmat as tinshemet is "animal", which seems to come from nasham, "to pant", which is used only once in the Hebrew Old Testament in Isaiah 42:14.  But a closer look at the Theology of the Bible tells us that GOD has taken to Himself the inhale masculine and exhale feminine sounds of our breathing, YH and VeH and combined them. 

Hence, when we look at the origin of Nashamah, a literal breath (of air) or breathing (in and out), we are to read it as a Trinity of a one and two letter root word combining as a three letter whole.  The letter Nun pronounced as if followed by an invisible Alef (Na - "to pray, ask, entreat, exhort") and Shem – “(the) Name"  or  Sham - "there".   If Shem is not implied, then Shamah is the singular of heaven ( pl. – ‘hashamayim'  or "the heavens").

When the pre-incarnate Yeshua breathed into man the breath of the second life

(cf. Lamentations 4:20,

The breath of our nostrils, the anointed of the Lord, was taken in their pits, of whom we said, Under his shadow we shall live among the heathen.

 Genesis 2:7, 

And the Lord God formed man of the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.

et al. ), 

He breathed into our forefather Adam the "breath of Heaven" as it were, as if the smallest sliver of the spirit and soul of GOD.

In breathing into man the second life, GOD gave us a new ability to discern with the heart and mind between right and wrong, and on how we are to think about and know GOD.  In a way, GOD planted a spiritual seed of Himself within man, who was first given a physical body or "basar" with 5 external senses in which to house GOD's spiritual seed planted in Adam, and then GOD watched it grow.

At the moment of conception, when GOD breathed into Adam the breath of lives, Adam (the first man from whom we all physically have our genetics) became a "son of GOD", a little higher than the angels in his formation and creation.  When Adam fell, he chose to exercise a misuse of the ability to discern between right and wrong and how to think on GOD who is SPIRIT (cf. Hebrew- Ruach / Greek -  pneuma).  In his fallen state, Adam followed a mood, a state of mind involving appetite and inclination (cf. Hebrew -Nephesh / Greek- psyche).      The living soul, the living mood and appetite and inclination unto GOD in Adam Himself was effectually slain, and with it the living spirit died within man also (and along with it, his ability to discern between right and wrong and how to think on GOD.   Until age 7, for whatever reason, children are most receptive to be pointed back to and to recover some of the proper state of mind and faith that Adam lost, and most adults have long since learned to wrongly destroy and deny themselves of.   

To right the wrong of Adam being led astray by another of GOD’s Creation, a cherub whom Masons and Satanists and others even in our own day worship as Lucifer – Sirius and a host of many other names (the Muslims directing their worship to that fallen one as “allah’), for whatever reason, GOD thought it prudent to inhabit a house of flesh fit to be inhabited, born of the seed of David, of the virgin daughter of the seed of David, using a well-spring source of water from Heaven springing up in the virgin's womb 

(John 4:14

But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst; but the water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting life. )

to form a man child in the womb.  Man died from believing the words of a murderer. So man would come to live by believing the One who first gave life to man at the Beginning...and as man died by an act of unbelief, so should his descendants have the opportunity to live by faith – trust into that same person of the GODhead that is the author of all our souls, by which when we relight the dead pilot light in all of us by believing into Yeshua, His words, His atonement, His Death - Burial - Resurrection - Ascension to Heaven, we can become eternal living souls embracing life and not death or loss.  


The LORD JESUS CHRIST is the ONLY means by which man can commune with GOD and have eternal life, as I show is the true doctrine of Christ Jesus and true Christianity elsewhere.

http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2012/05/john-146-theology-contained-within.html

There are those who believe by taking young blood and by ritual or transfusion they can obtain longevity. 

 They are intellectually and spiritually lost on this.

Leviticus 17:11 tells us that the blood is the gateway to the soul,

For the life of the flesh is in the blood: and I have given it to you upon the altar to make an atonement for your souls: for it is the blood that maketh an atonement for the soul.

And what is that true gateway to eternal life if physical blood cannot be manifest at all times in physical application to both atone and flow?   John 6:63 tells us that the words of Christ Jesus (in time and through time and in spite of time) act as the means of granting eternal life:

It is the spirit that quickeneth; the flesh profiteth nothing: the words that I speak unto you, they are spirit, and they are life.

 In the Gospel of Paul, written by Luke in Rome and delivered to John in Ephesus in 57 A.D. after the June 29 deaths of Peter and Paul in Rome, Paul stated in what we now label as Hebrews 11:3-6 that

3 Through faith we understand that the worlds were framed by the word of God, so that things which are seen were not made of things which do appear.

4 By faith Abel offered unto God a more excellent sacrifice than Cain, by which he obtained witness that he was righteous, God testifying of his gifts: and by it he being dead yet speaketh.

5 By faith Enoch was translated that he should not see death; and was not found, because God had translated him: for before his translation he had this testimony, that he pleased God.

6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.

Believing is a life-long endeavor, it is a process of learning and growing...of bearing fruit year after year, so that we, like the tree of life, might be removed from Earth

(Genesis 3:24

So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.    ) 

to the presence of GOD in Heaven

(Revelation 22:2

 In the midst of the street of it, and on either side of the river, was there the tree of life, which bare twelve manner of fruits, and yielded her fruit every month: and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations.  ), 

there placed in the midst of the water of life, even as promised in 

Psalm 1:2-3

2 But his delight is in the law of the Lord; and in his law doth he meditate day and night.

3 And he shall be like a tree planted by the rivers of water, that bringeth forth his fruit in his season; his leaf also shall not wither; and whatsoever he doeth shall prosper.

Romans 10:9-10,13,11

9 That if thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, and shalt believe in thine heart that God hath raised him from the dead, thou shalt be saved.

10 For with the heart man believeth unto righteousness; and with the mouth confession is made unto salvation.

13 For whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.

11 For the scripture saith, Whosoever believeth on him shall not be ashamed.

  Shalom.