Paul Krugman Reveals Left's Intent To Initiate Death Panels No Later Than 2025 - 2030

Glenn Beck’s “The Blaze” posted the ff. (in red) which shows how the Left believes and thinks, as announced by insider Paul Krugman, and is planning for your future…initiating a holocaust or forced whittling down of Society sometime between perhaps no later than 2025-2030 A.D.  

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/02/22/lying-worm-becks-reaction-to-krugmans-death-panel-remarks/


Eventually we do have a problem. That the population is getting older, health care costs are rising,” Krugman said during his lecture at Sixth & I Historic Synagogue in Washington, D.C. “There is this question of how we’re going to pay for the programs.”

“The year 2025, the year 2030, something is going to have to give,” he added. “We’re going to need more revenue … Surely it will require some sort of middle class taxes as well.”

“We won’t be able to pay for the kind of government the society will want without some increase in taxes … on the middle class, maybe a value added tax.”

“And we’re also going to have to make decisions about health care, doc pay for health care that has no demonstrated medical benefits.

So the snarky version, which I shouldn’t even say because it will get me in trouble, is death panels and sales taxes is how we do this.”








 Below is a World War II British Newsreel of what the Left knows and intends upon its enemies of Republican Conservatives, Christians, and others.  WARNING: THOUGH HISTORICAL, NOT FOR THE EMOTIONALLY HYPER-SENSITIVE TO DISTURBING IMAGES.

Press Release: 20 Former United States National Security Leaders say: STOP UNILATERALLY DISARMING AMERICA'S NUKES, OBAMA!

-------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.centerforsecuritypolicy.org/2013/02/22/20-top-national-security-leaders-to-obama-stop-the-unilateral-denuclearization-of-the-us/

Press Releases | February 22, 2013 | Nuclear Deterrence


For Immediate Release




22 February 2013
Hon. Barack Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C.  20500

Dear Mr. President:

The latest North Korean underground nuclear test represents both a danger and an opportunity.  The danger is obvious:  One of the most unstable regimes on the planet is continuing to amass the skills and the capabilities to produce, weaponize and perhaps use the most dangerous weapons known to man.  The fact that Pyongyang is doing so together with other nations hostile to us and our allies – notably, Iran – raises the possibility that the threat posed by North Korea’s nuclear weapons technologies will soon metastasize around the globe.


The opportunity this ominous turn of events offers is the chance to reconsider your pursuit of the goal of “ridding the world of nuclear weapons.”  It is now clear that, as a practical matter under present and foreseeable circumstances, this agenda will only result in the unilateral disarmament of the U.S. nuclear deterrent.  That will make the world more dangerous, not less.


In our professional judgment, born of decades of experience with national security policy and practice, America’s “Triad” of nuclear-armed land-based and submarine-launched missiles and bomber-delivered nuclear weapons has promoted strategic stability and discouraged proliferation.  Steps that raise uncertainty about the viability, reliability and effectiveness of our deterrent will have the opposite effect.


According to published reports, you are considering further, draconian and perhaps unilateral cuts in the numbers of nuclear weapons in our arsenal.  We respectfully recommend that this plan be abandoned in favor of the fulfillment of commitments you made at the time of the New START Treaty to: modernize all three legs of the Triad; ensure the safety and deterrent effectiveness of the weapons with which they are equipped; and restore the critical industrial base that supports these forces.


Doing otherwise will put our country, its allies and our peoples at ever- greater risk in a world that is, far from nuclear-free, awash with such weapons – with increasing numbers of them in the hands of freedom’s enemies.  It is unimaginable that that is your intention.  It must not be the unintended result of your actions, either.


Sincerely,

• Adm. Thomas B. Hayward, USN (Ret.), Former Chief of Naval Operations
• Gen. Carl E. Mundy, Jr., USMC (Ret.), Former Commandant, U.S. Marine Corps
• Adm. Jerry Johnson, USN (Ret.), Former Vice Chief of Naval Operations
• Adm. James “Ace” Lyons, USN (Ret.), Former Commander-in-Chief, U.S. Pacific Fleet
• Vice Adm. Robert Monroe, USN (Ret.), Former Director, Defense Nuclear Agency
• Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney, USAF (Ret.), Former Deputy Chief of Staff, U.S. Air Force
• Hon. R. James Woolsey, Former Director of Central Intelligence
• Hon. John R. Bolton, Former U.S. Permanent Representative to the United Nations
• Hon. Douglas J. Feith, Former Under Secretary of Defense for Policy
• Dr. William R. Graham, Chairman, General Advisory Committee on Arms Control, 1981-1985; Director, Office of Science and Technology Policy, Executive Office of the President, 1986-1989
• Lt. Gen. E.G. “Buck” Shuler, USAF (Ret.), Former Commander of the Eighth Air Force (Strategic Air Command)
• Maj. Gen. Paul Vallely, USA (Ret.), Former Deputy Commanding General, U.S. Army, Pacific
• Rear Adm. Robert H. Gormley, USN (Ret.), Former Chief of Studies, Analysis and War Gaming, Joint Chiefs of Staff
• Hon. Kathleen Bailey, Former Assistant Director, Arms Control and Disarmament Agency
• Hon. Fred Celec, former Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Nuclear, Chemical, and Biological Defense Programs
• Hon. Henry F. “Hank” Cooper, Former Director of the Defense Strategic Initiative (SDI); Former U.S. Representative to the Defense and Space Talks
• Hon. Samantha Ravich, Former Deputy National Security Advisor, Office of the Vice President
• Hon. Troy Wade, Former Director, Defense Programs, Department of Energy
• Frank J. Gaffney, Jr., Former Acting Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy
• David J. Trachtenberg, Former Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security Policy

Second Amendment Concerns in February 2013

Hat Tip to:  http://www.exposeobama.com/

http://www.exposeobama.com/2013/02/21/disarming-americas-heroes/

Michael Connely of the United States Justice Foundation has stated to the effect that perhaps as many as Hundreds of Thousands of U.S. Military Combat Veterans without due process of law and without a judicial hearing are being told by the Obama Administration that they are magically and suddenly ineligible to own a firearm by some "rule-making" that is prohibited as unConstitutional by the United States Supreme Court.    


Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966) @ 491
 "Where rights secured by the Constitution are involved, there can be no rulemaking or legislation which would abrogate them.”


Almeida-Sanchez v. United States, 413 U.S. 266 (1973) @ 272
 "It is clear, of course, that no Act of Congress can authorize a violation of the Constitution."


United States v. Brignoni-Ponce, 422 U.S. 873 (1975) @ 877
 "But "no Act of Congress can authorize a violation of the Constitution," Almeida-Sanchez, supra at 413 U. S. 272, "

 


In the sensational 2008 return to Originalism Interpretation of the Constitution over the Second Amendment, in "D.C. v. Heller",
 http://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/07pdf/07-290.pdf
 the U.S. Supreme Court clearly affirmed that you do NOT have to be part of a Militia to own a firearm as a citizen of the United States, that you have the right to possess and lawfully use that firearm, including for that purpose of self-defense within your home.  

 It is alarming that U.S. Military Veterans are being unjustly and illegally told that in respect to the Bill of Rights under the Constitution, specifically the Second Amendment, "this CONSTITUTIONAL right no longer applies to YOU."  

And if the Leftist to the point of often being a Communist-Socialist ideology driven Obama Administration  can deny and get away with denying our Military Veterans, some of the most esteemed members of our society, this heinous injustice, why not then freedom of speech also, and thereafter every other right listed under the Bill of Rights for one excuse or another?





Our Military Veterans of Foreign Wars, skilled in the use of firearms upon a hostile ideologue radical enemy, are being targeted by Domestic hostile radical ideologues who associate with those who call for the deaths and holocausts of fellow Americans simply because they are Conservatives, and are an enemy to one day be slaughtered by them as if weeds, and trampled upon as if inhuman astro-turf.  Conservatives of America are viewed with the same vitriol of hate by the  Leftists inside and in support of the Obama Administration as Nazi Germans had toward the Jews of the Holocaust in the 1930s and early to mid 1940s.  

Our fellow citizens, United States Military Veterans who fought for our rights and to help others attain the same, are being told that they don't count anymore, or at least, not as much.  Military Veterans honorably discharged, many with distinguished service records besides,  are receiving a legal notice from the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs stating:


"A determination of incompetency will prohibit you from purchasing, possessing ,receiving, or transporting a firearm or ammunition. If you knowingly violate any of these prohibitions, you may be fined, imprisoned, or both pursuant to the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act, Pub. L No. 103-159,as implemented at 18,United States Code 924(a)(2).”

{{{Update 02/22/2013  - A pdf of the 3 page letter, dated December 20, 2012, has been posted at:

 http://static.squarespace.com/static/4f34530ecb12e336a9dfe29c/t/5127fe2ae4b0706f4bc5fa50/1361575466089/VA-letter%20Copy%20by%20RedFlag%20News.pdf

   Hat Tip to World Net Daily for the Link and follow up story @

 http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/obama-threatening-veterans-gun-rights/

 where WND also posted a copy of the same 3 page letter.  

-- End of 02/22/2013 Update}}} 

An  ex-Secret Service Agent, Dan Bongino, recently stood outside and joined a mostly Conservative Citizens Rally making yet another stand over Constitutional and Representation concerns.  The Conservative Rallies, often TEA PARTY sponsored or driven, has been yet again notable in its characteristics by its lawful and peaceful (even family friendly) assembly, and stated a few well chosen words.





[[[Update 02/23/2013   Hillsdale College Lecture on
 "The Second Amendment as an Expression of First Principles"  released 02/15/2013 added below.   End of Update]]]