[Updated September 16, 2011]
Hat Tip and thumbs up to Orly Taitz at
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/ for the document images I am re-posting and/or linking (depending on your computer browser's capability).
(Re: Complaints. Pictures not visible in certain Windows browsers or versions of Windows operating systems.
One of the benefits of the internet, is that I have a world-wide audience of dozens of nations, but also many operating systems are used to get here. I have discovered that after the first day of operation, not all browser systems will thereafter still see the pictures. Certain supported Internet Explorer versions may simply drop out the actual pictures and display a box; while other browsers such as Firefox and Chrome will continue to display the images. In order to help overcome this, I have posted direct jpg links to where the document pictures were first posted. I humbly apologize for any inconvenience this may cause. Thanks. -- Sincerely, Brianroy)
In 2009, Obama was still collecting income on book royalties and other sources. He did NOT declare that income.Cf. Michelle Obama's posted jpg
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Obama-tax-returs-and-e-verify_0004.jpg
with Barack's.
Not only do the Obama's use fake Birth Certificates and a stolen / identity theft SS# for Barack, they almost without question appear to be cheating on their taxes and declared income for tax year 2009. Figures.
Alex Jones jumps in on the Obama Social Security Number Fraud issue
WND E-Verify Story cited ( by Jerome Corsi, 09/12/2011)
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=344461
WND CEO and chief editor Joe Farah comments on the issue (09/15/2011)
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=345181
Orly Taitz Affidavit
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/affidavit-of-Orly-taitz-regarding-Obamas-SSS.gov_0001.jpg
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/affidavit-of-Orly-taitz-regarding-Obamas-SSS.gov_0002.jpg
Felicito Papa Affidavit
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Obama-tax-returs-and-e-verify_0001.jpg
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/Obama-tax-returs-and-e-verify_0002.jpg
Obama and Bauer (Identity Documents for Obama) Fraud upon the Court
The only ones guilty of committing Fraud upon the Citizens
of the United States of America and upon the Court (whether it is Barack
Hussein Obama II’s Birth Certificates or Social Security Number) is Barack
Hussein Obama II and his lawyers under 1), 3), 4), 5) of what defines Fraud
upon the Court as cited in Workman v. Bell, 245 F.3d 849 (6th Circuit 2001) @
852. Only a Fraud will demand a release
only through Public Relations Officers, and not directly from Officers of the
Court (practicing attorneys at law), and not ever allowing any claimed
documents to be introduced into evidence in a Court of Law simply because they
are fraudulent to begin with.
“Fraud
on the Court is conduct:
1)
on the part of an officer of the Court;
2) that is directed to the judicial machinery
itself;
3)
that is intentionally false, willfully blind to the truth, or is in reckless
disregard for the truth;
4) that is a positive averment or a
concealment when one is under duty to disclose;
5)
that deceives the Court.”
Workman v. Bell, 245 F.3d 849 (6th Circuit 2001)
@ 852
Bauer and the Attorneys of Perkins Coie are already guilty of violating US Code
18 § 1028
USC
18 § 1028. Fraud and related activity in connection with identification
documents, authentication features, and information
(a) Whoever, in a circumstance described in subsection (c) of this
section—
(1) knowingly and without
lawful authority produces an identification document, authentication feature,
or a false identification document;
(2) knowingly transfers an
identification document, authentication feature, or a false identification
document knowing that such document or feature was stolen or produced without
lawful authority;
(3) knowingly possesses with
intent to use unlawfully or transfer unlawfully five or more identification
documents (other than those issued lawfully for the use of the possessor),
authentication features, or false identification documents;
(4) knowingly possesses an
identification document (other than one issued lawfully for the use of the
possessor), authentication feature, or a false identification document, with
the intent such document or feature be used to defraud the United States;
(5) knowingly produces,
transfers, or possesses a document-making implement or authentication feature
with the intent such document-making implement or authentication feature will
be used in the production of a false identification document or another
document-making implement or authentication feature which will be so used;
(6) knowingly possesses an
identification document or authentication feature that is or appears to be an
identification document or authentication feature of the United States or a
sponsoring entity of an event designated as a special event of national
significance which is stolen or produced without lawful authority knowing that
such document or feature was stolen or produced without such authority;
(7) knowingly transfers,
possesses, or uses, without lawful authority, a means of identification of
another person with the intent to commit, or to aid or abet, or in connection
with, any unlawful activity that constitutes a violation of Federal law, or
that constitutes a felony under any applicable State or local law; or
(8) knowingly traffics in
false or actual authentication features for use in false identification
documents, document-making implements, or means of identification;
shall be punished as
provided in subsection (b) of this section.
...
(A) the production or transfer of an identification document,
authentication feature, or false identification document that is or appears to
be—
(i) an identification
document or authentication feature issued by or under the authority of the
United States; or
(ii) a birth certificate, or
a driver’s license or personal identification card...
(5) the term “false authentication feature” means an authentication
feature that—
...
(C) appears to be genuine, but is not;
...
(7) the term “means of identification” means any name or number that
may be used, alone or in conjunction with any other information, to identify a
specific individual, including any—
(A) name, social security
number, date of birth, official State or government issued driver’s license or
identification number, alien registration number, government passport number,
employer or taxpayer identification number;
....
See also:
What is it that Robert Bauer of Perkins Coie offered
the Court NO EVIDENCE but referrals for the Court to simply look at newspapers and partisan (Socialist Democratic source links) the one time he even referred to any substantiation of the Obama Short Form (or any form) Birth Certificate at all in Hollister
v. Soetoro Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-02254-JR? The Short then, and the Long Form Birth Documents for Obama being fraudulent, are certainly NOT the
documents a practicing attorney would dare introduce into evidence, and if legitimate Bauer had the full legal authority
to introduce them into evidence while IN COURT.
No, rather, matter of factly at a minimum by appearance, Bauer (and the Law Firm Perkins Coie by extension) apparently and
quite successfully hung his hat on getting away with committing legally defined
FRAUD upon the Court. (Cf. emboldened sections of 18 USC 1028 above).
Hollister
v. Soetoro Civil Action No. 1:08-cv-02254-JR quote:
“1 President Obama has publicly produced a
certified copy of a birth certificate showing that he was born on August 4,
1961, in Honolulu Hawaii. See, e.g., Factcheck.org,
“Born in the U.S.A.: The truth about Obama’s birth certificate,” available at http://www.factcheck.org/elections-2008/born_in_the_usa.html (concluding that the birth
certificate is genuine, and noting a contemporaneous birth announcement
published in a Honolulu newspaper). Hawaii officials have publicly verified
that they have President Obama’s “original birth certificate on record in
accordance with state policies and procedures.” See “Certified,”
Honolulu Star Bulletin, Oct. 31, 2008. This Court can
take judicial notice of these public news
reports. See The Washington Post v. Robinson,935 F.2d 282, 291 (D.C. Cir.
1991); Agee v. Muskie, 629 F.2d 80, 81 n.1, 90 (D.C. Cir. 1980).”
In fact, if push comes to shove, Perkins Coie will throw Judith L. Corey of Perkins Coie, assigned with being liason with the Hawaii Dept. of Heatlh
http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/rss_viewer/birth-certificate-correspondence.pdfunder the bus. Obama Attorney Robert Bauer (by the clearly premeditated design behind the above pdf link docs released by the White House) has his fail girl, even as Obama always has someone else to blame or take the fall for the sake of his political expediency. In Obama's case, he can always blame Loretta Fuddy or her predecessor Dr. Neal Palifox, or his predecessor at the Hawaii Department of Health.
Obama and Bauer are afraid to take this issue of just how much of an identity fraud he and his co-conspirators legally are committing on in a Court Trial. They don't want people reading up on the Law, they want people like those of the Media who will drop to their knees for Obama. Don't believe it? Just check out his more recent ego needs statements to a partisans-only-are-invited crowd in North Carolina.
What does Obama say? "
If you LOVE ME you gotta...."
I don't love you Obama, and we don't gotta anything, except expose you for the felonious criminal and usurper you are (and do so legally and peacefully).