Holy cow! The Speaker of the House is a chronic drunk, a sot!

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=123472

http://www.judicialwatch.org/weeklyupdate/2010/04-pelosi-party-planes#anchor1

Nancy Pelosi has charged up $101,000 in the last two years to US tax payers, much of it apparently on BOOZE!

"Maker's Mark whiskey, Courvoisier cognac, Johnny Walker Red scotch, Grey Goose vodka, E&J brandy, Bailey's Irish Crème, Bacardi Light rum, Jim Beam whiskey, Beefeater gin, Dewars scotch, Bombay Sapphire gin, Jack Daniels whiskey … and Corona beer." DRUNKARD! No wonder she had no sense of reality last Spring and Summer when she behaved more like a drunken and disoriented female version of deceased comedian Paul Lynne than as House Speaker. Booze and prescription meds...acid 60s to the end, eh? Well, anywhere else in America, being under the influence on the job will get you FIRED!

Maybe it is time we demand that Congress be given drug and alcohol tests when they show up for work, because this kind of binge drinking demands Pelosi be stripped of the Speakership, and commited into an alcohol rehab program or forced into immediate retirement, resigning her House membership as well.

Congress needs to pass a Speaker and House Sobriety Act, where for the next 2 years, Congress has to randomly and completely (everyone must complete) do a blow-tube test for alcohol every 6 weeks, and a drug test every 3 months for the next 2 years. The results of any twice failed drug test, or twice failed alcohol test using two different units made available at the same blow test, must be reported to the Ethics Committee and released to the Press within 24-48 hours. That's my input.

The Weatherman Underground Documentary

Obama's radical friends, and their Weather Underground rationalizing, history, and psychological make-up. Should be rated R plus, that no one under 18-21 should view it...some brief vulgar language, violence, newsreel graphic scenes, and brief nudity. In reality, with the immaturity of the youth and their under-developed rationalizing, anyone under 30 who is not yet emotionally as well as intellectually developed, nor read up on this group to some more than introductory degree, also shouldn't bother with the film...as maturity is required to properly view and comprehend this topic. For legal responsibility and as a safety precaution, viewers are sometimes asked to enter a birth date confirmation that places the onus of responsibility on the viewer...allieviating me and hulu.com, but for some reason it does not always come up. Therefore, I place 3 warnings in this post:
Those not able to handle even a basic Freshman College level documentary...DO NOT CLICK ON THE LINK! You have been warned!

In regards to the Weather Underground, it shows that they themselves are not intellectuals, but in a group rating for their lack of intelligence and their propensity toward anarchy - mindless sex - and mindlessness on psychedelic drugs, they should be "rated M - for Morons".

However, the concept of the Revolution and the radicals are explained in such a way, that one needs take the same unrepentant individuals, and apply their inside the Executive Branch of the United States Government via the usurpation of Obama, and to easily follow the logical regression of the words to action and probable actions by the Obama Administration.

They were and still are terrorists who are sympathetic to Al Qaida and revolutionary anti-US, especially are especially anti-White and haters of pacifists and peace loving Americans...and especially hate law enforcement and the military. These are among Obama's closest mentors, and he is their disciple. But getting back, this film is about the Weather Underground...friends of Obama, not Obama himself.

The film uses many of the Underground in their own words, and raises some interesting questions...beyond that of "why the hades aren't these free terrorists locked up for life like just one of their confederates", et al.?

Those not able to handle even a basic Freshman College level documentary...DO NOT CLICK ON THE LINK! You have been warned!





Those not able to handle even a basic Freshman College level documentary...DO NOT CLICK ON THE LINK! You have been warned!

Should be rated R plus, that no one under 18-21 should view it...some brief vulgar language, violence, newsreel graphic scenes, and brief nudity.

The Erev Hypothesis, a Young Earth, and the Earth's Magnetic Polarity as the yard-stick by which we must measure geologic time here on earth

The Erev Hypothesis. The abstract goes to the effect that the contrariness to the laws of observable sciences (such as gravity) can be contradicted or disrupted for periods of short durations, so as to suspend those laws within a means of controlled chaos...albeit, temporariliy.

Erev simply means evening in the Hebrew, "And evening and morning", etc. But it also has 13 - 15 other meanings attributed to it. One of these is "disorder" or "controlled chaos" if you will.

I first explored this notion in past research that discussed the paleomagnetic pole reversals. At the point of critical mass where the entire planet must shift and right itself, there would have been a counter buffer zone that would drive the magnetic poles back while charging from the magnetic core, producing very temporary catastrophic imbalances that would create or move whole mountain ranges, valleys, lakes or seas virtually overnight.

The Dead Sea Region was addressed in February 2006 GeoScienceWorld with an article entitled: "Earthquake-induced clastic dikes detected by anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility" that is of interest.
http://geology.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/34/2/69

In fact, a mountain might even walk 20 or 30 miles from east to west and settle as if it had never moved. This eyewitness account was passed down in the Psalms of such an event. I considered and then promulgated the Erev Hypothesis because of biblical texts and an inspiration by knowledge of the accelerating shifting in the magnetic north pole

NASA - Earth's Inconstant Magnetic Field
http://www.nasa.gov/vision/earth/lookingatearth/29dec_magneticfield.html

which appears to be a cyclical event that can explain certain miracles and phenomenon in the Earth's past.

http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/14jan_northpole.htm
http://science.nasa.gov/headlines/y2008/images/northpole/SWOOPS_solar_wind_plots.pdf
http://tda.jpl.nasa.gov/progress_report/42-159/159J.pdf

While the shifting of the magnetic north pole in an of itself does not create the miracle, what happens when it reaches a buffer point in following its pattern toward creating a magnetic critical mass that would temporarily defy gravity to a weightlessness not unlike what was experienced upon the moon, the rolling back of rivers, the automatic drying up of land as water is repelled in an area magnetically polarized with two of the same type charges...etc.

This pattern of magnetic critical mass upon Earth could have occurred daily in the first 7 days of Creation, and in disastrous consequences in 2348 B.C. (Noachian deluge), 1961 B.C. (Sodomic Epic and misdated Holocene shifts), 1551 B.C. (the Exodus' Red Sea and Sinai events), 1511 B.C. (the reversal of the Jordan and the sun appearing to stand still for a day).

The 18 January 749 A.D. earthquake of the Dead Sea area http://geology.geoscienceworld.org/cgi/content/abstract/31/8/665
damaged certain strata by enduring "boulder bearing flash floods" as well as an earthquake...and such damage often alters recontructive geologic timelines of erosions of many tens of thousands of years into a single week, but are never atributed or given the proper chronological error adjustment. The only reason that any mention of this earthquake is given, is because the only differences between the more ancient buildings and those built since the late 700s in the Dead Sea area appears to be simply alluvium and lake deposits...something that is never considered into the projections of a simple strata hillside or trench dating projection. Hence, a town on the same lakeside or hill or mountain elevation but a mile away, can be projected as thousands of years old...while the same strata examined at the same elevation where no town is built, can be projected as tens of thousands or millions of years old, even though both were likely silted up and covered at the same time, by the same storms or natural means.

We are still yet discover monster storms of the past with winds that modern man cannot yet comprehend, nor has made adjustment for as well. Case in point: hypercanes. In the past two decades and more, there has been the notion and then the subject of Hypercanes...ancient super-hurricanes which perhaps had winds in excess of 400 mph. In 2008, , the subject resurfaced in regard to strata in the southern US Gulf coastal region.
http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/44/44_4/Hypercane.htm

And if in the Gulf of Mexico, why not an equal percentage increase in other parts of the world?

The undetermined Magma flows and their relations upon vulcanism
Under the Earth's crust lays what is believed to be a vastly liquid mantle made of magma so deep, that the greatest ocean depths by comparison are puddles by comparison. The fact is, we do not know how deep the magma flows decend or how they truly operate...only that the magma is there, and in great quantities far in excess and depths of the ocean waters. The fact of the matter is, what we "think we scientifically know" about the mantle depths, is based in part upon solar observation.
That being the case, we note that the sun in a violently active entity, casting off its own magma in the entity of solar flares. There are oceanic currents and gas pockets upon the sun, and outward pressures which boil off or forth. If the flares are tendencies to be in correlation with what happens in volcanic eruptions, then this explains why random vulcanism occurs. There are also cooling and darkened spotings that occur upon the sun, and massive tidal waves that roll to and fro and dissipate. These appear to be unrelated to the sun reversing its polarity every 11 years, and other factors are at work. But what if we were to cover the sun with a cool crust, and continents, and waters. Would the same forces be at work underneath, to which now we would no longer have exposed to us to see? Most definitely.
It is my contention that the Earth is gradually cooling, and as it cools, so the mantle becomes more and more a immobilized (dead) crust. The oceanic patterns of mass currents of the mantle's magma has never yet been discovered or documented, therefore, what science now claims takes millions or billions of years to do...be it to push up mountains, divide a continent or islands from that...may have only taken
days and months over several great cataclysmic events in the near geologic past, and documented in rock strata as great magnetic divergences or shifts. Thus, a massive enough mantle magma tsunami would have created something akin to an electro-magnetic field spike, while turning the crust above it into a liquid instability, allowing manipulations that cannot be comprehended when it is in its stable form. Those who have also experienced being in multiple medium to large scale earthquakes will know this liquidity factor first hand. Earthquake waves will be answered in the study of like events patterned for us by the sun. G-D has given us observable answers, but it is up to us to use our own wits to see what the Almighty has left for us to discover and understand while using that reason.


The Volcanic Dead Sea Rift caused by a magnetic chaos induced (underground) Magma tsunami to the tectonic plates?
Another consideration is that the Dead Sea Rift area, which saw mountains walk, is also a volcanic rift...and this factors into the magnetic influences that could literally surf a portion of land many miles by an underlying wave of magma, much like an underground tsunami.

The Dead Sea Rift is technically considered as a volcanic fault which extends from southern Turkey and onward through the Dead Sea and onward.
http://journals.tubitak.gov.tr/earth/issues/yer-98-7-2/yer-7-2-1-97012.pdf

The basalt content appears to be concentrated in points north from the shallow southern end of the Dead Sea, especially in the mid and northern end.
http://www.jmo.org.tr/resimler/ekler/6a558d97954d069_ek.pdf?dergi=T%C3%9CRK%C4%B0YE%20JEOLOJ%C4%B0%20B%C3%9CLTEN%C4%B0
YÜRÜR M. T. (1) ; CHOROWICZ J. (2) ;
(1) Hacettepe University, Department of Engineering Geology, 06532, Beytepe, Ankara, TURQUIE
(2) Université Paris 6, Géotectonique, Case 129, LGGST, 4 place Jussieu, 75252 Paris, FRANCE

In their joint report, they (among others) note that strike slip and extension tectonics have shown that the rift has moved westward according to their structural mapping. They specifically mention the presence of the Dead Sea's "Amanos fault", creating an oblique slip-tension, “giving rise to a fissure-fed, mantle-derived alkaline volcanism”.

This could be viewed as cause to state a hypothesis that the moving of the western lands at the Dead sea were once at a much greater rate or distance -- via a sudden great tension release, like being at the bottom of a linen tear -- than that experienced in Anatolia or Lebannon.

And even though Anatolia in the NOW moves west at 7 millimeters a year, and Sinai at 5 millimeters a year in the NOW…if magma induced…the distances could rapidly increase from millimeters to miles for a matter of days.

This Dead Sea “fissure volcanism produced tholeiite [low-alkali basalt usually commonly formed underwater ] followed by alkali basalt along the Amanos fault, the northern end segment of the Dead Sea Fault”. That is, it produced that low-akali magma that is part of that magma that also greases the movement of land masses, FIRST...being that which is also involved in the quick creation of Islands (or land masses underwater). RE: Journal of volcanology and geothermal research ISSN 0377-0273 CODEN JVGRDQ 1998, vol. 85, no 1-4 (542 p.) (1 p.1/4), pp. 1-15
Publisher Elsevier, Amsterdam, PAYS-BAS (1976) (Revue)

In reading the above, now apply the testimony of Psalm 114 with the notion of the above Dead Sea Amanos fault affecting the region of the Dead Sea and the Jordan, with both volcanic and tectonic action in play.

LITV (Jay P. Green literal translation)
Psa 114:1 When Israel came out of Egypt, the house of Jacob from a people of strange language;
Psa 114:2 Judah became His sanctuary, Israel His kingdom.
Psa 114:3 The sea looked and fled; the Jordan turned back;
Psa 114:4 the mountains skipped like rams; the little hills like lambs!
Psa 114:5 What ails you, O sea, that you flee? O Jordan, that you turn back?
Psa 114:6 O mountains, that you skip like rams? O little hills, like lambs?
Psa 114:7 Tremble, O earth, from the face of the Lord, from the face of the G-D of Jacob;
Psa 114:8 who turned the rock into a pool of water, the flint into a fountain of waters.

It is unclear if an earthquake is expected now to have accompanied the striking of the rock in order to redirect underground water streams for Moses and Israel's sake...but the language of Psalm 114 clearly indicates a traveling of mountains and hills at the two events of 1551 B.C. at the Red Sea, and 40 years later at the 1511 B.C. Jordan crossing. These would have had to have been whopping regional earthquakes to melt hearts as far away as Babylon, and to visibly move mountains and hills across measureable distances from what they were previously (according to Psalm 114).


Shifting weather patterns in Antiquity
As the earth warms up and becomes more active through the waning and shifting of the electro-magnetical fields, and empowers stronger and more frequent storms events in our own times...we must now geologically ask ourselves, what kind of evidence would be required for a hypercane type of storm that made landfall (such as up from the Indian Ocean) in the Levant?

In Job we have the notion of G-D inhabiting tornadoes...tornadoes that we now experience in frequency on this side of the globe as Israel and Syria did then... and in other OT Scriptures, we see a like phrasing in which G-D "has His way in the whirlwind and the storm", etc. That is, the tornadoes we now experience almost exclusively in North America, were once many thousands of miles east...in the Middle East...so that there is a shifting storm pattern that would have to be factored in as we examine various strata. In both the Western Sahara and in the Jordan river above the Dead Sea thousands of miles to the East, were once swamps with crocodiles and all manner and sorts of species and environments no longer extant. But the swamplands of the Jordan may have still been in a shrinking existence to as late as the 8th and/or 7th centuries B.C. But I digress.

It may be, that events such as the Holocene shifts of land masses (which I believe first created the Dead Sea in the mid-1900s B.C.) and the parting of the Red Sea (in 1551 B.C.), or the bending of the heavens upon Mt. Sinai (again 1551 B.C., weeks ff. the former), could be re-witnessed as accurate event happenings by the ancients by modern man as he experiments with his super linear coliders, if such should suddenly shift the Earth's Magnetic poles and shift the Earth off on a rotation axis adjustment.

The Hadron Collider
This mega-linear collider http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/ will be one of the keys for us to understand and see the Biblical past in present fluxes of known scientific laws of Creation. Associated with the Hadron collider is both hope and dread:

http://www.sciam.com/article.cfm?id=the-discovery-machine-hadron-collider

Will new collider create black holes that destroy us all? - The Boston Globe
http://www.boston.com/news/science/articles/2008/04/21/will_new_collider_create_black_holes_that_destroy_us_all/


Science has been infused with moral idiots and those in the last century having a great ignorance to those forces which governs the miraculous or intervening activity of G-D in the Bible from Genesis 1:1 to Exodus 14:21-22 to Joshua 10:13 to Luke 23:44 / Acts 2:19-20, and so forth.

It may be that the Hadron Collider will show that pole reversal or disrupted paleomagnetism will be the physical answer that the "unbeliever" will grasp inseeing the truth of the Biblical historical literary record.

Both those at the EU's Geneva and USA's Los Alamos projects seek THE Star Wars weapon of the linear super collider. In its military aspect, electro-magnetic pulsation is a specific weapon that can render all electronics as without capability of accepting or sustaining power, or of retaining data of any kind. Hence, from CDs and DVDs to appliances to vehicles to power grids to any object sustaining or dependant on electric charges, or its use, will be rendered impotent.

It will be the super collider that will sustain the ability to create power source of the "ultimate", the coming earth to satellite to earth laser weapon, in which at the press of a button, a laser zap can be made at any location or target on the face of the Earth by the presses of a key board and a sustained Space program.

The downside of this new technology may be that we will accelerate the decrease in global electro-magnetism, and accelerate pole shifts...one of the true components of danger in global warming...moreso than sulfur dioxide releases and temporary ozone depletions.

In the past 150 years...or so it is believed...the Earth has already moved 10 percent into the same kind of total magnetic pole reversals as seen in the sun, and documented by the Ulysses satellite.

Sunspots and blackouts are in direct correlation to these pole disruptions and reversals, and we can tie such to the 30 A.D. sackcloth sun, and another to come in these last days, sometime perhaps between 2012 and 2042. No one knows for sure.

Most agnostic and atheist archaeologists will discount that the Reed or Red Sea could part, and walls of water stand. Through mega-disruptions in the earth's poles, the laws of gravity as sustained and promoted from Earth-Sun-Moon are altered. Such documentations of magnetic pole shifts have been reported as observable in minute geologic sample borings up to 400 meters in depth.

http://www.pnas.org/cgi/reprint/101/37/13423.pdf

But as the writers of that pdf state in the opening of p. 5, "Time cannot be estimated except very crudely...." This is not just on two strata close together, but I dare say on all 5 observable levels of these magnetic pole reversals in strata samples mis-listed as millions of years apart, I would interpret as perhaps being the same magnetic polarity shifts of : 2348 B.C., 1961 B.C., 1551 B.C. , 1511 B.C., and 30 AD.

Such a paleo-magnetic shift and manipulation extending far out beyond the Van Allen belts may well be explained in this way as end-time happenings also in Luke 21:25 through the Greek (word pictured in the box parenthetical with the text below):

And there shall be signs in the sun,
and in the moon,
and in the stars;

and upon the earth
perplexity [A compelling pressing afflicting and plaguing with and among]
of nations,
with distress[I.e., no resources and great doubt as how to proceed];

the sea and
The waves [that which resonates and vibrates]
roaring;
Luke 21:25

The idea of sun echo is more than an intensifying of a holding together, in this verse’s application, it is likened to as if pressing in upon a claustrophobic in the middle of a crowd, who is that at the same time is a flying apart emotionally and physically with fear and disease (via the nervous system).

The Greek word used for waves, Salos, can incorporate anything that causes motion, vibration, waves, tossing, rocking….events such as wind, currents - surf - tide, electro-magnetic forces, earthquakes, and so forth.

Even if these great "star wars" machines do not destroy the planet ("for the earth abides forever" says Scripture)...between natural means and unnatural manipulation...modern science may see a day archaeologists would not dare to have previously believed [which requires intellectual acumen as well as faith], a manipulation of the laws of science in ways that verify the Bible...but to our own destruction.

What may appear as electro-magnetic science fiction at the first, when investigated, may also have to be considered as a viable alternative explanation to the archaeological record concerning the Israelites and certain events in Egypt and the Levant. And when this is realized, there will be scientific confirmation to the same textual redating of the Old Testament I have discovered, in which the Greeks themselves and the Biblical writers have poited us to an approximate date of 1551 BC for the Hebrew Exodus from Egypt.

If many scientists are offended in a belief in a young earth, then that wrong belief is on them. Granted, created matter and such things may appear to be older than they are, but that is because man is still ignorant on the differences between scientific ...i.e., repeatedly accurate testings ... examples that are consistently the same "time perceptions" of antiquity; that of chronic erratic manipulation of data a by evolutionists who attempt to make older than what really is; and flummery. We have seen the data manipulations through the Global Warming Climate Science that found to be so subjective, that only 15% of the relevant and objective data was at times used, because the other 85% of the equally relevant and and equally objective data forced an opposite conclusion.

Geochronology and chronology in astro-physics regularly cross over in the reasoning process for evolutionists, and is directly influencing all fields of science, including the field of archaeology.

The more billions of years they say the universe is, the more millions of years man's existence becomes. Age perception is exactly that...a perception.

How about the study of the composition of the human bone and how long it takes to revert back to dust? And what of strata depths to virgin soil. In relation to virgin soil depths, , what of Dr. Leakey digging a human boneout of six inches of earth in Kenya, wetting his finger, and saying that his human bone find is "millions' of years old without a single blink from the academic communities? And yet, civilizations but 2,000 years old are covered in depths of 16 to 30 feet or more...but Leakey says 6 inches of soil in Kenya = millions of years? That is so puerile, it would be hilarious if it wasn't so seriously received by his anti-Christian peers having their atheistic or other subjective agendas.

The gorging and habitual eating of riverbed mollusks can alter the chemistry of man or beast to appear to Carbon-14 testing to be as many as a few hundred to even thousands of years older than they are...even if frozen in a lake for three years, and mummified, the C-14 might make someone you went to school with appear to have been from around the arrival of those on the Mayflower in 1620. Mollusks by themselves, even when fresh, have been recorded as old as about 4,000 years by C-14 tests. These were freshly killed mollusks...and the sediment of riverbed botoms altered the C-14 accuracy, we are told. Yeah...but by 4,000 years?

Chemistry utilizing projection chronology decay models on the human bone can be shown to consistently and repeatedly to differ from the theory of evolution and "old earth" theorists...showing that the bone would have softened and disintegrated prior to 12,000 years. We should perhaps better address it as a state of currish vanity assisted by the intellectual hidrosis, because these evolutionist academics regularly and compulsively mythologize science, while entering into a state of heteroecism that intoxicates the minds among themselves. Its likened to a fry of the metencephalon (the after-brain)...metaphorically speaking, if you will.

http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/40/40_3/Henry.htm

http://www.creationresearch.org/crsq/articles/41/41_1/Helium.htm

Science needs a better processing of the Research Data in regard to the geo-chronological issues. There needs to be a focus study in which the top of their fields discuss objectively both sides of the Young Earth/Old Earth issue and utilize radioisotope dating methods: radioactive decay and radioisotope dating, rubidium-strontium dating, potassium-argon dating, samarium-neodymium dating, uranium-thorium-lead dating, radiohalos and fission tracks, radiocarbon dating, and an project an accelerated decay model based on the data.

Just the electro-magnetic polarity waning can be atributed back to within 12,000 years as its rate of decay from an original state, it seems to me. Unless we can show a waxing of the earth's magnetic polarity in the same time-frame, a Young Earth is the scientific chronological boundary in which age must be measured.

In Spring 1984's issue of Los Alamos Science, 1982-1983's ISEE-3 satellite data shows that it was the solar winds that are to be blamed for sheering off portions of the earth's electro-magnetic polarity or plasmoid [the earth's polarity projecting out in many levels of thin waves or sheets].

In layman's terms, this tells us that solar flares and solar winds are capable of disrupting Earth's protective electro-magnetic plasmoid...and if it it is only those EXTERNAL Solar gases and particles which can disrupt the plasmoid -- again, the solar winds and solar flares -- that are breaking off slices of (hence weakening) the Earth's electro-magnetic life-force some 600,000 miles from the surface...could the Ozone issue be directly connected to electro-magnetic shifts and solar activity, rather than Cgases of modern industry? Yes. In other words, it isn't industrial gases that is depleting the ozone, it's the sun!

This disruption of the earth's magnetic polarity (such as by the sun) is apparently a natural cycle. As we have seen evidenced in our links to the Mauch Chunk Formation in Pennsylvania (Opdyke, University of PA, 06/2004) and NASA (Earth's Inconstant Magnetic Field -12/29/03), we have noted that the Earth's magnetic polarity reverses itself in cycles...waxes and wanes...at a much slower rate than that of the 11 year cycle that our sun experiences.

The focus, then, is...if the earth's magnetic field waxing and waning is so inter-related...and I say it probably is...then likewise, when the Earth's ozone protection wanes and creates penetration of ultra-violet rays from the sun with great alacrity...the whole issue of carbon dating is skewered, because now we have to come up with a projection model that is as full of holes and inconsistency as the satellite imageries at NASA show...and combine the chaos of ozone disruptions over magnetic polarity shift models. This can also be true to some degree in regard to the waxing of the Earth's polarity as it strengthen's also the ozone layer, causing milder build-up of plant carbon that may be used in the dating process as well. De facto, it does not neccesarily properly balance out unless one can project the correct algorithym for the location being searched out.

That is, in the same region, such as Israel, we could have an ozone and C-disruption aging sites and material 300 or 600 years older than they are, while a greater disruption in northern Iraq (letting more toxic amounts of radiation through) ages the material in the same century as Israel to be 2,000 to 6,000 years older via the Carbon dating methods...at least, hypothetically.

The reason why we seem to have what amounts to be a myth about the industrial C gases being the cause of the ozone depletion, is to give an outlet to avoid a planetary population panic. It seems to me, that had the carbon footprint Ozone depletion been real, we would have first evidenced the disruption in or strictly along commercial flight paths which maintained altitudes exceeding 5 miles (26,400 ft.) and more. That has NEVER been the case in any study of which I am aware. But for now, it still deteriorates in conjunction with the waning and shifting of the electro-magnetism of the Earth and with solar (and sometimes volcanic activity, which appears co-related, but not neccessarily by gas expulsions).

The Ozone will eventually improve by natural course, but it may take up to another century or more to do so...and in the mean time, is there an irradiating effect going on in plants under the Ozone holes right now to support this, so as to make a new plant (perhaps in new compost) as if it were many years old when it is but months? Perhaps only an independent study to see how this directly affects archaeological carbon dating or other radio-active reliant chronology of all kinds will do precisely that. And the true numbers of projections may not be available for years, maybe even decades, until a downward bottoming out of Ozone and reverse Electro-magnetic polarization has been acheived, and the data for the upward (as well as downward) data has also been collected and analyzed.

So if we have any visitors from such a group of scientists trying to come up with ideas as to what to study to obtain grant money...this Ozone-Electromagnetism-Solar Chronology hypothesis is for you. Since electro-magnetic sciences are now so far advanced as to be used in oil exploration, why not a relationship with Ozone layer fluctuations and chronologies based on Carbon and other dating?

Whether the hypothesis sinks or floats...it would still be nice to know with a greater degree of certainty what stands or falls when tested fairly and properly.

Just a few thoughts and something to think about.

Mystery of Sumerian kings Text solved: Sumerian kings reigned in days, NOT YEARS

The Sumerian king list: translation
Citing only in part:

1-39 After the kingship descended from heaven, the kingship was in Eridug. In Eridug, Alulim became king; he ruled for 28800 years. Alaljar ruled for 36000 years. 2 kings; they ruled for 64800 years. Then Eridug fell and the kingship was taken to Bad-tibira. In Bad-tibira, En-men-lu-ana ruled for 43200 years. En-men-gal-ana ruled for 28800 years. Dumuzid, the shepherd, ruled for 36000 years. 3 kings; they ruled for 108000 years. Then Bad-tibira fell (?) and the kingship was taken to Larag. In Larag, En-sipad-zid-ana ruled for 28800 years. 1 king; he ruled for 28800 years. Then Larag fell (?) and the kingship was taken to Zimbir. In Zimbir, En-men-dur-ana became king; he ruled for 21000 years. 1 king; he ruled for 21000 years. Then Zimbir fell (?) and the kingship was taken to Curuppag. In Curuppag, Ubara-Tutu became king; he ruled for 18600 years. 1 king; he ruled for 18600 years. In 5 cities 8 kings; they ruled for 241200 years. Then the flood swept over.

Black, J.A., Cunningham, G., Fluckiger-Hawker, E, Robson, E., and Zólyomi, G., The Electronic Text Corpus of Sumerian Literature (http://www-etcsl.orient.ox.ac.uk/), Oxford 1998- .



http://etcsl.orinst.ox.ac.uk/section2/tr211.htm

U le’u akannaka sattu gabbi - the scribe and the [engraved] record are there the entire year The Assyrian Dictionary (University of Chicago), p.157

http://oi.uchicago.edu/pdf/cad_tet.pdf

Sattisamma - year by year p.122

It seems that the proper word for "year", rather than a simple measure of time of an unknown factor, does not appear in the Akkadian chronology for it to be translated as "year" or such.

The word "year", not being a variant of sattu in the relevant texts below...are translated as to what appears to be an original intent of the scribe...an approximation of "days" is the logically correct translation...often in forms of one hundred as the measure of rounding up or down...based on reconstructing the corruption of the texts.


The chronology of the list of Sumerian kings is resolved by a better translation, reconstruction of corrupt texts to original intent, and a placing of that chronology upon the accuracy of the Biblical chronology.

1-39

After the kingship descended from heaven, 2348 B.C.
{after Noah’s ark}
the kingship was in Eridug.

The word for heaven, might easily be read as that which was first intended as waters from above...or, 'after that the [Noachian] flood receded". If this is the intent, there may have to be an adjustment to create a family (grandchildren and great grand-children) of Noah. This adjustment can be as little as 15 to as many as 50 years. All you need is a son of Shem intercoursing with two of his sisters or cousins for the clock to start ticking...if we were to take that approach. But the best we can do with the text, for now, is just a generalized reconstruction...until a better or comparative copy from antiquity surfaces.


In Eridug,
Alulim became king;

he ruled for 28800 {DAYS}. 78 years 10 months 2348 to 2269 B.C.

Alaljar ruled for 36000 {DAYS}. 98 years 6 months 2269 to 2171 B.C.

[some 22-30 years after 2269 B.C., the earth is divided]

2 kings; they ruled for 64800 {DAYS}. 177 years, 4 months -- ending 2171 B.C.


Then falling over to Eridug
Taking (into account) the kingship (in regard to) Bad-tibira.



In Bad-tibira, En-men-lu-ana ruled for 43200 {DAYS}. 118 years, 3 months 2348 to 2230 B.C.

En-men-gal-ana ruled for 28800 {DAYS}. 78 years 10 months -- 2230 to 2151 B.C.


Dumuzid, the shepherd, ruled for 36000 {DAYS}.
98 years, 6 months -- 2151 to 2053 B.C.


3 kings; they ruled for 108000 {DAYS}. 295 years, 7 months


Then falling over to Bad-tibira
Taking (into account) the kingship (in regard to) Larag.

In Larag, En-sipad-zid-ana ruled for 28800 {DAYS}. 78 years, 10 months -- 2053 to 1974 B.C.


1 king; he ruled for 28800 {DAYS}. 78 years, 10 months

Then falling over to Larag
Taking (into account) the kingship (in regard to) Zimbir.

In Zimbir, En-men-dur-ana became king; he ruled for 21000 {DAYS}. 57 years, 6 months -- 1974 to 1917 B.C.

1 king; he ruled for 21000 years. 57 years, 6 months


Then Zimbir fell (?) and the kingship was taken to Curuppag.

In Curuppag, Ubara-Tutu became king; he ruled for 18600 {DAYS} 50 years, 11 months -- 1917 to 1866 B.C.

1 king; he ruled for 18600 years. 50 years, 11 months


In 5 cities 8 kings; they ruled for 241200 {DAYS}. 660 years, 3 months

However, the actual length breaks down to something like 482 years of existence, with 364 years of some kind of regional domination...both having their point of reference as ending 1866 B.C.

There may have to be some adjustment in the dating and translation regarding Eridug. The alternate scenario would have usregard the first de facto ruler as in 2230 B.C. as the date immediately following the fall of Babel, while dating Babel to within a decade of the Biblical expectancy.


"Then the flood swept over."

That is, here in this instance, "wiping the slate clean."

It is an expression of resoftening the clay, so that it can be reused for writing...or telling us that a new accounting, or sub-history, or of those with lesser titles, is taking place.

Therefore, we are next prepared for sub-kings, district lords, or first administrators of their provinces during the period following that up to this point. The Sumerian structure had essentially disintegrated by 1866 B.C., according to this timeline of the Sumerians, which dating is verified against the Bible timeline. But, like the vice-regent duality lists known to Manetho, who counted second in commands as if they too were Pharoahs…so also does this Sumerian account offer confusion in the number of what are reckoned as their own leaders. The list appears to be composed in or very shortly following 1720 B.C.



1866 - 1799 B.C.
(40-94) After the [same] flood [as listed above] had swept over, and the kingship had descended from heaven, the kingship was in Kic. In Kic, Jucur became king; he ruled for 1200 {DAYS}. etc.

... 23 kings; they ruled for 24510 {Days} ...Then Kic was defeated and the kingship was taken to E-ana. -- 67 years,1 month

...

1799 - 1793 B.C. / The Hyksos now invading Egypt, by my reconstruction of the Exodus timeline, textually provable by Greek history preserved by Patristics, and the Bible.


(95-133) In E-ana, Mec-ki-aj-gacer, the son of Utu, became lord and king; he ruled for 324 {Days}. etc.

...12 kings; they ruled for 2310 {Days}. Then Unug was defeated and the kingship was taken to Urim. -- 6 years, 4 months
...


(378-431) A total of 39 kings ruled for 14409 {Days}...in Kic.
That is, 39 years, 5 months or 1793 - 1754 B.C. in Kic.

A total of 22 kings ruled for 2610 {days}... in Unug.-- 7 years, 2 months or 1793 to 1786 B.C. in Unug

...A total of 134 kings, who altogether ruled for 28876 {days}

-- That is, 79 years or 1799 to 1720 B.C.

By this above reconstruction, edited down, we can see that the Akkadian / Old Babylonian / Sumerian vacuum was present in 1866 B.C.

If the Akkadians are any rule of measure to the Hittite issue...of the debate that sometimes arises as to precisely when the Hitites had their zenith in ancient history...we can say that the likelihood of the zenith of the Hittites was between 1866 B.C., to a point beyond 1720 B.C. on just the Sumerian texts alone.

With the Akkadian collapse, the uniting of bands in the Hittites would have allowed the prospering and dominance from the Lebanese Mediterranean Sea to the Euphrates river for hundreds of years, while being beyond the permanent logistically supported presence of an Egyptian army seeking to subjugate the same region.



In comparison, the nation of Israel's pre-Exodus Chronology is thus:
(Egyptian kings termed by the Greek names given them by their own historian Manetho. -- Brianroy).


Genesis 11:26 - Abram is born as one of a set of triplets in 2056 B.C.

Abram first enters Keme / Egypt in 1986 B.C.

The destruction of Sodom and Gomorrah ca. 1980 - 1960 B.C.

Isaac is born in 1956 B.C.

Esau and Jacob are born in 1896 B.C.

Abraham dies in 1881 B.C.

Joseph is born in 1804 B.C.

Beon succeeds Salatis as Hyksos ruler of the recent conquest of Keme / Egypt in 1791 B.C.

The lands being conquered are to be distinguished from Theban controlled Egypt. The Hyksos controlled only from Memphis and points north into the still forming Nile Delta regions.

A simultaneous Theban House of Egypt ruled in the south, and were part of the 330 of the Herodotan reference, though these rulers (and their vice regents who were also part of the 330 number used by Herodotus) ran simultaneously with the Hyksos rulers in the north.

Isaac dies in 1776 B.C.

Joseph receives Jacob and the house of Israel in 1766 B.C.

Apachnas succeeds Beon in 1747 B.C.

[The Assyrian Chronology ends in 1720 B.C., and the Hitites out of Modern Turkey now control the regions of Northern Iraq and through the the Levant as far south as Galilee, and co-exist peacefully in regions south of that...or perhaps rich merchants and traders from the Hittites so do.]

Apophis succeeds Apachnas in 1711 B.C.

Joseph, the son of Jacob and servant of Israel who was known of Apophis, dies in 1694 B.C.

Jonias, the "Pharoah" who knew not Joseph, succeeds Apophis, in 1650 B.C.

It is at this point, between 1650 and 1646 B.C., that the indentured servitude of the House of Israel begins, in which the Hebrews must forcibly work off their debts as a result of borrowing to feed and house the average family which regenerated at a rate of 5 sons every 30 years or so.

The massacre of the Hebrew boys occurs in 1631 B.C.

Moses is formerly adopted as an heir to the throne by 1628 B.C.

The wars of Moses in behalf of the Hyksos in Egypt was circa 1597 B.C.

Assiss assumes the throne of the Hyksos in 1595 B.C.

Moses receives his mandate in the wilderness to deliver Israel, no later than (Rosh HaShana) 1552 B.C.

The deliverance of Israel out of Egypt through the Red Sea in 1551 B.C.

History should supply veracity to religious faith based on spiritual truth, not bloody physical conquests

A few decades ago, it was the historian's and theologian's job to sift the historical, archaeological, and biblical data, and make the best sense of it. But now, in our lazy minded society of high tech, we have ever so slowly abandoned the difficulty of thinking to others, or to computer programmers who stamp machines with a pre-programmed subjective process on how it should "think" and "process" information, when posed with questions. Or hasn't any one else noticed?

Michael Grant, a popular historian on Greco-Roman histories wrote:
"People interested in history and people interested in religion ought to combine forces more than they do. A theologian's interpretations remain liable to contradiction unless he knows something of the historical background." Michael Grant, "Jesus An Historian's Review of the Gospels" (New York: Charles Scribner's Sons, 1977) p. 1


In the context of the Bible, conservative scholarship has also told usthat the reverse istrue also...that historians will benefit by trusting the historical veracity of the Bible.


"The excessive skepticism shown toward the Bible has been progressively discredited. Discovery after discovery has established the accuracy of numerous details." W.F. Albright, The Archaeology of Palestine and the Bible (Revell, 1935), p. 127.


"The interval between the dates of original composition and the earliest extant evidence becomes so small as to be in fact negligible, and the last foundation for any doubt that the (New Testament has) come down to us substantially as they were written has now been removed. Both the authenticity and the general integrity of the books of the New Testament may be regarded as finally established." Sir Frederick Kenyon, The Bible and Archeology (New York: Harper, 1940), pp. 288,289


"It may be stated categorically that no archeological discovery has ever controverted a biblical passage." Nelson Glueck, Rivers in the Desert (Philadelphia: Jewish Publications Society, 1969), p. 31


"To be skeptical of the resultant text of the New Testament is to allow all of classical antiquity to slip into obscurity, for no documents of the ancient period are as well attested bibliographically as the New Testament." John Warwick Montgomery, History and Christianity (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1976), p. 29


“Careful comparison of the New Testament with inscriptions and other early independent evidence has confirmed their primary claims . . . Competent historical scholarship must regard the New Testament documents as coming from the first century and as reflecting primary-source testimony about the person and claims of Jesus.” John Warwick Montgomery, History and Christianity (Downers Grove: InterVarsity Press, 1976), pp. 31,34.


It is important for us to study history...but to me, we also need to be faithful to the Almighty who gave us the Bible, and trust HIM over the ever-changing opinions and popularities of what men (or women) might think or say.

Gleason Archer Jr. puts it better:

"...the only alternatives available to us as we confront the Scriptures: either they are inerrant, or else we are." Gleason L. Archer, Jr. "A Survey Of Old Testament Introduction" (Chicago: Moody Bible Institue, revised 1994) p. 31

And a well respected scholar once noted the acceptance of Faith and History, stating,
"It is, indeed, difficult to restrict a discussion of the New Testament writings to the purely historical plane; theology insists on breaking in. But that is as it should be; history and theology are inextricably intertwined in the gospel of our salvation, which owes its external and universal validity to certain events which happened in Palestinewhen Tiberius ruled the Roman Empire."
F.F. Bruce in April 1959, as found in The New Testament Documents: Are They Reliable? (Downer's Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 14th reprint 1980), pp.5-6.

The Bible is vetted historically and archaeologically as accurate, and the merging of Faith with History is an acceptable expression of intelligent and open discussion. Unlike the Koran, where Sharia Law -- to this very day -- murders at a whim wherever it is allowed to flourish unhindered, in a backward Third World mentality that the West is in denial to accept as reality, until it is too late and the "true Muslims" (to their faith) are labeled terrorists only after the fact that the damage or criminal actions have been done. To them, all non-believers in Mohammed are never innocent, and subject to annihilation. Regardless of race or nationality. Period.

The same backward Muslim mentality displayed in the movie Khartoum



has never changed. Convert to Islam or be annhilated. Convert, and we won't kill you. Stay a non-Muslim, and it will be R.I.P. for you. See...isn't Islam a religion of Peace? But like politics, their meaning upon "peace" is the de facto meaning of "death", just like the Communist-Socialists and Progressives are doing today...changing their intent upon the meaning of the words, that you might be deceived, and THEY CAN COMMUNICATE SAFELY (as Yosi Sargeant was told by Valerie Jarret to conference call Obama lovefest worshippers in the Hollywood experienced propaganda campaign last August, 2009).

The Bible manuscripts have a chain of custody unlike any religious work in the world. It is more trustworthy than any other work of antiquity, bar none. The Bible calls to grant mankind liberty and equality. What has Islam ever done? Rape babies, rape children, and kill, kill, kill. Islam hasn't changed since the Devil motivated the schizophrenic and sun-stroked prevaricator Mohammed to make up his phoney belief system to gorge in stinky bloody menstruating sex and to kill until he could smell the very blood of the stinky insides of men. Mohammed "got off" on that. To him, death was his viagra or cialis. Mohammed represents the worst in man...but G-D, who is Spirit, wants the best in man to be presented forth...and gives us spiritual answers demanding spiritual action of a good and peaceful nature, and one that tells the truth, even if it offends, that souls may be saved.

Those that truly adhere to Christ have created the most good in the world (if we are to speak in terms of charity and sciences). After that, the Jews come in second. Were it not for Christianity, the world would still be traveling by cart and horse, and there would be no hospitals or the medicines and mass conveniences we enjoy today. No other belief system can say that and be honest. And if it were not true, then every belief system controlled by the Devil wouldn't be working in some undescribale unconscious conspiracy in mystic unison to destroy Christianity, and oppose it wherever they can find it. The uniqueness of Christianity, is that only those that dwell in evil and love evil hate it, while embracing any of the everything else.

Mark's Gospel: The Gopsel Preached by Peter, funded by and created for sailors?

Eusebius, History of the Church 6.14.6; traditionally translated:

While Peter was preaching the word publicly in Rome
and speaking out the gospel by the spirit,
those who were present,
who were many,
called upon Mark,
as having followed him from far back and remembering what was said,
to write up the things that were said,
and having made the gospel
he gave it out to those who had requested it.

With Greek word pictures and reiteration, it reads loosely as:

Peter, publicly in public places in Rome,
Heralded and preached, crying out the declarative Word
And spirituality (of) the Gospel.

That it go out to Pontus [or rather, to Sea],
Those (persons) present -- in truth, certainly many --
Summoned and invited Mark;
As in which manner, perhaps, an attendant follower who might succeed him
From a place at a distance,
And recall to mind, remembering the (very) licks of the words that were spoken
As public records/ recordings.
The Conclusion - what is made a work or creation, then;
the Gospel, bestowed and imparted, given to the company of those
who had earnestly begged, requesting him (for it).



It appears that the proclamation of exeipontos may be read as if
exeimi (to go out to ), and Pontos (Pontus, Sea).

That is, those sailors who travel and merchant between Pontos of the Black Sea and Rome.

The next break, as I read it, follows anagraphai. The preceding word of lechthenton has a three letter root of interest: Lech, which could be stated as "leicho", used in Luke 16:21's "hapeleichon" (licked), meaning “licks”.

For Mark to have to remember the very “licks” of the words of Peter, he would have to be one who accompanied as also proclaimed, with "the precise licks of the tongue" as "precise enunciations". the same Gospel Peter spoke…and to then remember the very licks or enunciations he spake himself, as he translated or echoed the words Peter proclaimed publicly.

In other words, the Gospel of Mark were not “private” teachings…they were “public” proclamations aimed at conversion of the masses. In the case of Polycarp, a bishop of Smyrna who served under John, the motivation was to save people from damnation to an eternal fire that will never be quenched (in the after-life, which would thence be the after-death or second death of them) if they did not convert.

Eusebius also uses the Gospel proclamation as a “logon”, as though a declarative word or reason of historical reality, the same as Clement of Alexandria did, who mentioned a story that was not a story, but a “logos“ / “ declarative word” in “The rich man who finds salvation”, (.42).
Interestingly enough, in that same opening of Clement of Alexandria's “declarative word“ of the rich man in chapter 42, we see that the use of his word “Tyrant”, when used in “The Martyrdom of Polycarp”, .2, was clearly projected as being the “proconsul” of Asia (.3,9,10,11), named Philip (.12), who ordered Polycarp to his death.

So if the region of Pontus had a like tyrant proconsul, what would be the motivation of Mark to write a Gospel for those from Pontus, since he never settled there…or took authority there…but rather ended up in Egypt? Not much.

Outside of Israel, Alexandria held the largest Israeli / Jewish population/concentration in the Roman Empire (according to Josephus). It was specifically a Judean allied stronghold, and the Apostles were, for the most part, Galilean. A like comparison that we might identify with, is that Galileans (in the eyes of many Judeans) were practically despised, as if their bias was like Yankee northerners by a Confederate south in the post-civil war days of our own history. And remember, even under Herod I the Great, and in the years ff. (such as Judas the Galileean, arch-robber who burned down part of Sepphoris) there were many violent and bloody internal conflicts and civil war surges.

Complications arise in confrontations about the past, or in regard to political-religious persuasions more in some places, rather than others. Perhaps Alexandria, until the mid-50s was such a place. For someone like Mark, there would have been a sort of an attraction to proclaim in a very populous city that was largely untouched by the Apostles. It was ideal.

Mark ended his life a leader and a martyr, not just anywhere...he did so in Egypt, and in the third largest city in the Roman Empire...the bread-basket export and “sailor’s” hub of Rome, as it were.


Therefore, we ought to read Eusebius to this effect:

Peter, publicly in public places in Rome,
Heralded and preached, crying out the declarative Word
And spirituality (of) the Gospel.

That it go out to Sea, [abroad]
Those (persons) present -- in truth, certainly many --
Summoned and invited Mark...

We then have hos an akolouthesanta, which speaks of not just an attendant, but of a student able to carry his teacher’s words and succeed him. This hints to us, that there, in June of 57 A.D., a bunch of merchant sailors offered Mark a position as succeeding Peter as an evangelist, 12 days out to Sea in Alexandria of Egypt, if perhaps he could prove his salt by calling to mind the public proclamations of Peter...as it were.

Satellite Interpreters?

We know that the Apostles and their followers vetted the Gospel of Mark. Mark, the one who "from a distance proclaimed publicly (and interpreted) his teacher as if an echo, was likely -- what I express and call -- a Satellite Interpreter.

What is a Satellite Interpreter? A Satellite Interpreter is a probable, but for now theoretic, application of a literary explanation from the Greek, of how the ancient speakers may be projected as having communicated to great crowds of many tens or hundreds of thousands in ancient times. He would need a clear and loud voice, and a very keen ear.

All of the disciples of Jesus -- if this theory is correct -- should be expected to have fulfilled this very same role in and during the ministry of Christ, on at least dozens of occasions when He spoke to multitudes.

The Satellite Interpreter and other relay speakers would stand at a predetermined distance from the one speaking. Either they would surround the speaker, as though equally spaced satellite around a planet, or they could fan out in a semi-circle. The speaker would say a sentence, perhaps several.

The Speaker would pause. Either the Satellite Interpreter would repeat the words as a megaphone in the same language, or he would exactly interpret, word for word, what the speaker said. In the days of Moses, the Captains of the thousands and hundreds would have had to fulfill this, to project Moses words across a distance area occupied by 600,000 soldiers and their families (numbering well over 2,000,000).

The crowds that gathered multi-nationally (such as even in New Testament Rome) would probably have looked for a flag, banner, or something that distinguished the Satellite Interpreter, so that he or she could gravitate immediately to the language they were familiar with, to understand what was being said.

Thus, the art of mass throng speaking, in these ancient times, was dependent upon being able to strike a speak-and-pause rhythm that would not overtake one’s own Satellites. This art of speaking was also used in the arenas, whether or not megaphones were available.

As you read the Gospel of Mark, you read a work that is based exclusively on the recording (or oral stenography, if you will) of the Satellite Interpreter Mark and the public evangelical utterances of an aged, and disabled by his age, Peter in Rome.


Peter's Age in Rome speculated:

Peter and Paul were killed in Rome under the reign of a (ca.) 20 year old Nero on June 29, 57 A.D.

This was some 27 years after the Crucifixion - Death - Resurrection -Ascension of Jesus.

In Acts 15:7 ff., we see that Peter gives up the reigns of primary evangelical preaching to the Gentiles over to Paul and Barnabas.

As a priest and leader of a neo-Sanhedrin, having created a parallelSanhedrin with like rules and religious observances to a great degree, Peter would have likely had to have stepped down in his leadership role of such a Sanhedrin after age 60.

The last leadership role he appears to have is after the death of James -- between 37 and 44 A.D., when Paul and Barnabas were commissioned to preach to the Gentiles following the death of Herod the tetrarch in ca. 41-44 A.D.

So if we benchmark Peter at age 60 in 44 A.D., or perhaps as old as 70 in the May 47 A.D. (the maximum of 10 years after the death of James, if James died in 37) -- we then see from the 47 A.D. Jerusalem conference of Acts 15, that we can potentially date Peter's birth as something to the effect of circa 24 - 17 B.C.

This would make Peter between 43 and 50 when he was called by Jesus to leave his boat in circa September A.D. 26, and between 46 and 53 years old when Christ was crucified in March of A.D. 30. Peter, then, would have been between 71 and 78 when he assisted Paul in founding the Churches of Rome, and between 73 and 80 when he was crucified in Rome, on June 29, 57 A.D. In the harsh conditions of the First Century, to have maintained such an age must have brought about attentative looks.

This age factor may alsobe used to explain Peter's brashness (in the Gospel accounts) as if he were trying to out-zeal the younger disciples about him, who he felt threatened by (because of his middle age).

This (above) age estimate of Peter also falls perfectly with the prophecy of Jesus in John 21, saying:

18 Verily, verily, I say unto thee, When thou wast young, thou girdest thyself, and walkedst whither thou wouldest: but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall gird thee, and carry thee whither thou wouldest not.

19 This spake he, signifying by what death he should glorify God. And when he had spoken this, he saith unto him, Follow me.

You are not young now, nor above age 50 as yet. But... you will take up your Cross (literally after a sense) as well.

And following this, when he does so take up his Cross, he will (under a dual application of prophecy) be (potentially) old and feeble (as well), not able to dress himself ...firstly dressed and transported by assistants; and when under arrest, he would be dressed by servants and carried off by the guards on the other.

Remember, John likely wrote this Gospel in the weeks or months just following the deaths of Peter and Paul …so we are also being informed of Peter’s state at the end in a “post-prophecy” hindsight.

Therefore, though an old man performing great miracles and healings and witnessing in Rome from May 55 to May 57 (when he was imprisoned by the 30th of May, 57)...Peter would have had great need for the satellite interpreters, human megaphones, to sound forth the Gospel to a hustling and bustling filthy city of well over one million souls, of every language and dialect, from all over the Empire.

And indeed, this system of "satellite interpreters" would have had to be a reality -- after the Israeli national custom -- dating back to Moses day.

So when Mark went to Alexandria, following his delivering Luke’s writing of Paul’s Gospel (Hebrews) and his own Gospel witness to John in Ephesus of Asia; and his pressing on to Jerusalem where a portion of Mark was then taken in the fall of 57 and preserved in Qumran Cave 7 with Dead Sea Scrolls...after visiting these places, it is likely that Alexandria also saw Mark following the Feast of Tabernacles come among them in the first days of November 57 A.D. There, at the harbor and amongst the sailors who already would have honored him by reputation already...the same method used that was used by Peter in Rome, was now employed by Mark and the students of him, along the docks and public places of Alexandria. And despite Mark dying in or about 62 A.D., the churches he founded by succession exist unto this day in the Coptic Churches of Christianity. And these, too, are our brethren in the L-RD. Welcome to them, and Amen.

Glenn Beck documents basics on Communism. This, the NEA refuses to teach, and such dumbing down will lead to future genocides as history repeats.

They who forget or ignore the past, will likely commit the same essential errors with the same general "bad" results. For this reason, history has been dumbed down by the Communist-Socialist NEA, as students are now made more like the Sheep of the State, rather than intelligent self-thinking pro-Republic individuals and finer human beings. I find that that is such a waste, and such a lost potential for good in the world that could have been.

Worst Case Scenario: Rand's Army Report, and later to be a Congressional request for a US Stability Police Force. I'll call the G-SOUP.

http://www.rand.org/pubs/monographs/2009/RAND_MG819.pdf

A Stability
Police Force for
the United States
Justification and Options for
Creating U.S. Capabilities

Terrence K. Kelly, Seth G. Jones, James E. Barnett II,
Keith Crane, Robert C. Davis, Carl Jensen
Prepared for the United States Army

Approved for public release; distribution unlimited



Recently, the Rand Corporation conducted a study for the U.S. Army’s Peacekeeping and Stability Operations Institute (PKSOI). I suggest calling these units as G-SOUP (Government Stability Operations Unit Police) -- contrary to the Rand designate aka. “Stability Police Force” (STP) -- because these will be loyal to whatever dictator or Government to which they belong with the primary function to "stabilize the Government" rather than act as a proper Law Enforcement Authority as we NOW know Law Enforcement to be.


Therefore, I have decided to run a worst case scenario on this report, because of an underlying theme they themselves lead people to conclude: 1) that 6,000 are not enough; and 2) that a 172 per 100,000 citizen ratio is the optimal goal for the size of the organization. For a US population, they want a force no less than 516,000 personnel. This will when the Progressives burn the US Constitution, replace it with Socialist-Communism, and then subject it under a future European dictator.

There are contradictory in between the lines trains of reasoning. One outward train resonates on a deployable 6,000 man task force.

But what is NOT discussed is the below the surface conclusion by a sabotaging of the surface argument. The argument for this 6,000 SPF force then, is that it is too small to do the job, and the secondary argument parallels the surface / readily seen wording, where it seems that the RAND writers wish the reader to conclude that every nation should have an SPF of their own. In fact, the reader is led down the garden path until they realize that RAND Arroyo is subliminally making the case for a 172 STP per 100,000 civilian population.
And what is worse, is that whoever controls this SPF, would be a de facto dictator who can kill (or make disappear) any VIP of any civilian or Government caliber at any time by a simple trigger authorization…be it the tap of a keyboard, a text, a few words spoken to the SPF “bodyguard(s)” assigned to the Congressman or Congresswoman, or the CEO of a multi-national multi-billion dollar company (be it a bank, an oil company, a food distributor, etc.).



In a 213 page report these are some of the highlight concerns that can easily be worst case scenarioed realistically to an actual worst case fulfillment, based on what they at RAND suggest in pushing to create the Beast the call SPF.


1) Pp. Xiii –Xiv A national Police combination Riot and Special Weapons and Tactics (SWAT) Force, deployable to anywhere in the United States at anytime for any given reason.

2) P. Xv Unit sizes of 1,000, of 4,000, and of 6,000.

3) P. Xvi tells us that this G-SOUP / SPF is to be an international force, deployable to any nation, is best suited for smaller nations. A larger force than 6,000 for larger nations like Iran, Venezuela, Pakistan, and Nigeria are not deemed as cost effective to the scope they have in mind.

4) P. Xvi-Xvii tells us that the deployment timeline should be made a month in advance of the operation. In other words, it is not so much a “police force” as a planned military operation under a different guise.

5) Pp. Xvii - XX scenarios using US Marshals, the Department of Treasury (Secret Service) with Homeland Security, the Department of State’s International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs division, and the US Army Military Police. The report infers that the Military Police would be the best force to handle the assignments, but need the “constraints” of the “Posse Comitatus Act” set aside.
However, a hybrid combination of the above agencies for G-SOUP seems preferred.

6) Pp. 1-15 The G-SOUP / SPF would be tasked with “specialized patrols”, counter-organized crime and surveillance operations (by the language vagaries they use), “crowd and riot control”, specialized tactic and secret police training.

7) P. 16 G-SOUP / SPF would be tasked by any US Ambassador or UN Senior Representative to do their bidding, or they could be placed under the control of some kind of “Joint Task Force Commander” whose allegiance, interests, and motives are NOT discussed.

8) P. 17 Two models for the construction of the battalions are considered: a) individual European national police forces, or b) “NATO’s Multi-national Specialized Units”, like those involved in Bosnia in the 1990s.

9) P. 21 Deployment will be used to those nations though to be “on the verge of war” as well as those suffering war, and those emerging from the ravages of war needing a greater rule of law and order. What is NOT discussed is who decides what “anarchy” is.

Comment: In the minds of Obama, Reid, and Pelosi, very peaceful and legal protests of TEA Parties (of lawful US citizens holding up signs for a couple hours) was to them groups to violently oppress with such a suppression force as G-SOUP represents. So the deployment of such a “Stability Police Force” depends greatly upon who are those ones doing the deploying and setting their mission criteria and agenda.

10) Pp. 24-30 states that (what I call the G-SOUP), the Special Police Force (SPF) will be tasked with taking control away from the local Law Enforcement Agencies, “Identifying and deterring high-end threats (IDHET)”, SWAT, “Crowd and Riot control”, “Investigations”, and “Intelligence collection and analysis”. Examples were highly conscious of the UN Peacekeeping role used in Bosnia et al. region of the 1990s. What they do not discuss, is the military tactical support of bombings by fighters, the use of tanks, cruise missiles, or what have you.

11) Pp. 31-34 The secondary role of the G-SOUP / SPF is to set up, teach, mentor those indigenous (read “over-thrown”) countries on what weapons and various equipments to purchase and obtain, and a how-to and SPK implementation of structure on policing from all the basics right on up to elite administrative and various forms of SWAT units. The Judicial and Correctional Institutions of a country may also be taken over and structured by the invasive G-SOUP / SPF.

12) Pp. 34-39 The G-SOUP/SPF will be tasked with high security responsibility and control.
a) Area /Site
b) Convoy
c) VIP
d) Border and Customs
e) Election
f) Refugee and Internally Displaced Persons

Comment: In short, it is logistically impossible for a 6,000 man force to accomplish all of this. The presumption being made, without saying it, is that an army of 50,000 or more would have to be assembled to fulfill an overseas assignment task…and if deployed within the United States, a United States Schutzstaffel SPF Army would have to be created. Whoever heads this USSS SPF Army would be the de facto behind the scenes dictator whose troops hang upon every VIP in and out of politics in the nation like a sword of Damocles, just waiting for the order that the lone hair “has snapped” and to “eliminate the protected target”. This is the logical regression that this report leads us down, and it is not pleasant to have to warn against this likely eventual outcome.
In other words, a massive SPF Army needing more 2,000,000 troops in the United States alone will control elections and their results (outcome). The SPF will control main sources of water, electricity (including nuclear), and the coming Concentration Camps set up by FEMA for “political prisoners” or anyone subject to control and elimination, just like the Russians in their Siberian Gulags, the Maoist Chinese Torture and Elimination Prisons, and the Nazi Concentration Camps. They will push out the Secret Services, the US Marshalls, and under one hand control or threaten the safety or even eliminate every diplomat or anyone they deem as VIP, including CEO’s of major international Corporations.
How does the SPF do this, or reach the needed numbers? It will have to be done by a forced conscription or “draft”. The ideologues and mushy willed would be grouped off to one kind of boot camp, and everybody else to another. The process then would have to undergo a kind of “sifting”, until all the right kinds of unquestioning to the dictator individual can be collected and cultivated, and armed just as well as any military short of having fighter-bombers, its own Navy, or nuclear weapons. The gunships they will likely have will be as advanced and perhaps even better armed than the military helicopter gunships, such as the Apaches and Cobras. No civilian resistance will be able to match the effective range of such aircraft, and for that very reason, the G-SOUP SPF will obtain them once they exceed a 50,000 man (or men/women) threshold
Therefore, while unit sizes for Administrative purposes may be divisional like US Army base, where 6,000 personnel are deployed on an active and operational base…or perhaps sub-divisioned further where 4,000 or 1,000 are sub stationed like a City or County Sheriff Departments, scattered in many locations within a designated territory or region in strengths of perhaps as few as 6 or 10 to perhaps 120 per sub-station. The overall strategy appears to me, as a means to crack open the flood-gates by a Congressional authorization of a 6,000 man SPF for a Billion in labor budget, and several billions in equipment and infra-structure costs, and then there would almost be no stopping the coming New World Order of the end-times Anti-Christ and of a One World Multi-national Government Police State.


13) Pp 40-49 The authors reach a conclusion that in addition to local military and police forces, an SPF high end calculation yields 1,720 SPF per 100,000 in population.

My Comment: If we apply this ratio to the United States, the SPF has no desire to exceed 516,000 members to its own organization. ..at this time. If the US has a population greater than 300,000,000…well then we simply increase the level of added SPF needed by 172 per every additional 100,000 inhabitants. The same ratio would hold in any other nation that signs up under the program, so that a nation of 56 million inhabitants would raise up another army of 96,320 SPF troops. And how will they pay for all of this? A visitation of the Stamp Act in US History shows us that simply barging into homes, finding a pretext, and dispossessing citizens of particulars to everything they have, and then auctioning off those possessions is one way. Forced labor camps would be the most cost effective, so that the enslaved churn out thousands of dollars in profit per person per day, at a cost ratio of >1000% of the profit after costs. If the employee does not meet their quota after three warnings, a 52 cent bullet - a $2 sack – a $50 bonus to the guard -and off to a nearby crematorium. The death expression could then be: “52-52 that F***er”.
The SPF Guards would actually be encouraged under such a program to off as many dissidents as they care to down to a 60-75% bed capacity, as long as their self-contained factories achieve or exceed the quota and meet the budgeted / allotted bottom line.


14) P.155-171 at p. 169, RAND suggests making the SPF as a 5th branch of the US Military as an option beyond the various other options it discusses. This seems to be the underlying or subliminal goal RAND wants the Congressman or Congresswoman to reach on their own after hearing their Lobbyist and convinced US Army Personnel pitch the idea, and in discussing it with them later.

But consider this: when a force the same size as a branch of the military as it stands now, 516,000 is discussed, it is an increase of 20-25% of the US Military overall. That means, as a capable of fighting and killing US Citizens on US Soil Armed Force...which authorization must be granted for it to perform its function once it becomes authorized to exist in the first place...the budget will also be required to be matching that military budget ratio of the other Armed Services, as well. So, if 400 Billion is allocated to the military annually now, the costs will rise up to a total of 500 Billion dollars annually with an SPF or G-SOUP overflowing the costs of running the US Government pot.

Remember, this is a worst case scenario assessment of what COULD happen, based on the abuse of power and arrogance displayed by Nancy Pelosi, Harry Reid, their minions, and the usurper Obama...whom, as a usurper, would be motivated to authorize such a force to protect him and keep him and his puppeteers in power after they have their own "revolution" and announce that the Republic of the United States is no more, and in its place, is whatever Communist-Socialist form of Government that they announce. That's my input.

Poetry by Brianroy: Along the Road

Along the Road we all travel,
upon each our own individual paths;
some looking for no way out,
some looking and not liking the path out that they find.

We all must make do with what talents and gifts we have, and can acquire.

And as you walk the days, on some it is like being in heavy sand or mud,
and on others like walking on smooth asphalt or bumpy gravel.

Sometimes Time itself travels so quickly, and yet our progress seems so slow;
and through no fault of our own we must pull to the side,
while the world continuously passes us by in a steady flow.

But in this wide open country, where is it that they are rushing to?
We are born with nothing than that given us by the Almighty Creator,
and nothing we take to the beyond but that which He rewards us with,
we are like the clouds drifting in the skies of the illusion of blue.

Did we nourish, did we take away?
As we travel along this road, let us do both.

Did we sound the warning of thunder, and flash the lightning of truth upon the world?
Did we help more than hurt?
Did we show compassion in deeds and not just in words?

What is the meaning of life, along this road...sometimes like a narrow uneven dirt path or an open field upon which we travel?

We cannot of our own reason or intellect resolve it,
we must look to the Son of G-D, Jesus Christ, and listen and heed His words;
and constantly let His words be in our ears, and before our eyes,
trusting in His guidance and care.

And before long, we shall then reach the end of our road,
and in Paradise, having been both invited and guided,
we will be taken to meet the Son of G-D there.

For it is not by our works,
but it is by our trust in Him we are saved;
and it is to our ever looking to His great atoning work upon the Cross,
when all our sins, forever, He anticipated them all...and yet still, He forgave.

L-RD Jesus lead us to thee,
and let us not journey astray;
lead us along the road and guide our journey,
this moment, this hour, this day.
Amen.





Accompanying thoughts following writing the above poem

We, as human beings, are the combination of the highest order of outward fleshly vessels of our eternal inward souls. It seems that our very existence is to imitate the Creator in creating life, both physically and spiritually. When we correctly follow our design, and the male sows his seed into the fertile female spouse where he is supposed to, we join G-D in perpetuating the creation of souls, as co-Creators of our children. As parents, we are not the “Creators”…that design and ability was implanted in us, by the Creator, in our DNA/RNA. Instead, we become Co-Creators to the limited extent that G-D takes of our male and female souls and creates for us an offspring bearing both physical and spiritual traits and identity from us.
When we take the seed of fruits and vegetables and plant them, and watch over them and take up their produce, we become as overseers and caretakers of that which is entrusted to us. Because the seeds of plants are as alien things, not created by “our” power, nor are of “our” being, we are not co-Creators with G-D in their growth, but as the angels…caretaking, and exercising some sort of entrustment and responsibility. We are not to act as “gods” in abusing others, and ruling their lives…but sometimes we are to help guide and constrain certain acts and activities that are detrimental to doing direct harm.

One of the 19th-20th century hero to the Communist-Socialists and Progressives in America, is British author and philosopher George Bernard Shaw (1856-1950), who said: " Democracy is a form of government that substitutes election by the incompetent many for appointment by the corrupt few." And of the politician: "He knows nothing and thinks he knows everything. That points clearly to a political career." In other words, everyone but a talented dictator is corrupt and stupid. Says Shaw, His warped view of a popular faith "...obliges me to be a Communist."
yet the fleshly philosophical and party affiliation requires him to be atheistic, so in adherance to the party view, Shaw abandoned Christianity to become an apostate who saw everyone as corrupt as he was privately, saying "Every man over forty is a scoundrel." Therefore, anything goes...and morality, the rule of law, while Shaw demanded he be protected by it, hypocritically stated that it should effectively be scattered to the wind. And that was supposed to be intelligent? If Shaw could have had his way, perhaps he would have joined Himmler in being one of those to decide on life and death, for the advocated Death Panels that inspired the Holocaust Camps of WWII and the vague language in Nancy Pelosi's SEIU authored House Healtcare Bill of July 2009. Remember, this man, George Bernard Shaw, is not simply a fascist hero, he is a de facto CURRENT Communist-Socialist literary. Watch the videos of him in 1936-1937 in his own words advocating genocide.







True Christians, unlike Shaw the apostate who denounced his faith by his philosophies and in his own words, true Christians do not seek to have our Governments imitate and exalt dictators and mass-murderers; and we -- unlike Shaw -- do not suggest death panels upon people every 5 to 7 years, and if they cannot prove they are of value to the collective. Whereas Shaw sems to advocate that the Governments just kill them -- the perceived useless by his definition, contrary to Christ -- on the spot, or "humanely" kill them with "a quick and painless gas".

That fleshly reasoning removes the soul G-D gave us, and the reasoning toward life and the betterment of the Creation we have been entrusted with. We are called to build up life, restore life, ensure that others as well as ourselves are not governed by dictators or tyrants hell-bent on destroying millions like Mao his 70 millions or more, or Stalin his 40 millions or more…of their own peoples, and ethnicities.

G-D wants us to learn the lesson in this life in which we discover, that we want to be more like Him, even with our flaws, and be so inclined whenever our souls pass from here back to the Creator’s will. If we choose the flesh alone, and pursue sin, our soul falls through the bowels of the Earth to hell. If we trust in Christ Jesus for the salvation of our souls, and that He has given us the gift of eternal life through the Cross, and the witness of his rising from the dead and ascending into Heaven, then wheresoever He is, there also we shall be (John 12:26).


When we share when someone is in dire need, rather than sell, we participate in a reaching back though our most ancient past, when our First Father Adam, was created as a child, and in his soul was a sliver of impartation from G-D, and Adam ceased to be simply animal, but became human and a son to G-D. And when Adam fell, thousands of years later, the same Deity who breathed the second life and the soul of reason into Adam, came and dwelt among us, and mankind beheld His glory, as the only begotten of G-D the Father, and Him they crucified as according to G-D’s own prophecies…hence, His plan.

All this, and more, the goal in life is for us to discover this eternal truth…and then, not to hold onto it and manipulate others for the chance to know this secret knowledge; but to share this knowledge freely, without money and without price.

Interviewer asks Obama, "are you in charge now?" Obama answers, "No." and "No".

http://blogs.abcnews.com/george/2010/01/transcript-george-stephanopoulos-exclusive-interview-with-president-obama.html

Barack Obama in a January 20, 2010 ABC News STEPHANOPOULOS Interview with a former Clinton White House handler who coaxes and helps Barack through his interview.

----------------------------------
OBAMA: ...And here's my assessment of not just the vote in Massachusetts, but the mood around the country.
...People are angry, and they're frustrated. ...And here in Washington -- from their perspective -- the only thing that happens is that we bail out the banks.

STEPHANOPOULOS: But you're in charge, now.

OBAMA: No, well...No....

Obama (video version): ...Here's one thing I know, and I just want to make sure that this is awful clear though. The Senate certainly shouldn't try to jam anything through until Scott Brown is seated. Ah, the people of Massachusets spoke; ah, he's gotta be part of that process.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Number one ...

OBAMA: That, that's point number one. I... would advise that we try to move quickly to coalesce around those elements of the package that people agree on. ...insurance reform...cost containment... Those are the core, some of the core elements of, to this bill.

OBAMA: And, you know, if there's one, one thing that I regret this year is that ...we lost some of that sense of, you know, speaking directly to the American people about what their core values are. And I think that, you know, the thing I'm seeing is remoteness and attachment and I think that I can do a better job at that and partly because I believe that.

Obama regrets not better indoctrinating Americans as to TELL THEM: "these are your new core values". Obama might as well be saying: "Don't tell me...I'm TELLING YOU. You are evil, aloof, disdainful of other nations...and need to be subjugated by my Muslim and Communist-Socialist confederates because your core values "just don't measure up" to mine."

So Obama regrets not telling us what he demands our "new core values" are? Usurper Obama, the thief who stole the Presidency by fraud as an unconstitutional NON-US Natural Born Citizen wants to give us the shuck and jive guilt trip? Boy, oh boy, talk about an example of hypocrisy.

Notice also, in the interview excerpt, that Obama promises to immediately return to "jamming legislation through", by any means necessary, legally or illegally, ethically or unethically. The end justifies the means, as long as "his side" is doing it.

The American people are angry, but Obama, like an aloof self-loving dictator could care less. He and Reid and Pelosi have a Communist-Socialist burn the US Constitution agenda to fulfill, and by gum, they are going to overthrow the United States of America for Communism or Cloward and Pivin collapse it.

And if so, Obama can then move back home to his adopted nation of Indonesia...to the city of Jakarta, where when he last visited, he talked about it being like "Coming Home", or words to this effect.

And did you catch the question and answer above, about Obama being in charge and he answers "No." and "No"? So Obama tells us he isn't in charge. Is Biden the de facto President, and that is why Obama must always use a teleprompter and stick to the script?

Obama says he isn't in charge of the Presidency? That's a pretty big confession to make. Is there any substance to his twice affirmation of that?

In 2009, Obama is said to have made some 411 speech and interview appearances. In perhaps all but perhaps 11 of these (including 20-30 second introductions) Obama's handlers REQUIRED OBAMA TO USE A TELEPROMPTER in 2009.

Why? Is Obama admiting he is a puppet to others? Is he that stupid? Not only has Obama lied about Healthcare Transparency, and bi-partizsanship...Obama has legally fought to seal his birth records and school transcripts. You know, what classes he atended and what grades he got, and if or not he was even a US Citizen or Foreign National when he attended. If Obama was a legitimate office holder, instead of a usurper or law-breaker, he would have released the transcripts and Long Form Birth Certificate telling us which hospital he was born at and what doctor signed off on him. But like a felon who risks imprisonment and the end of the Con, he refuses to release anything. Didn't Bernie Madoff do the same kind of hiding game, though with different kinds of documents, with those investors he ripped some $60 billion dollars off of? Did that also not come down to a lack of transparency and SEC vetting, and a refusal to investigate accusations of fraud? You betcha.

Barack has gotten a free ride in the Mainstream Media for two primary reasons; the first, based on a race card, because he is 50% black and is accepted as black, and secondly, Barack is a like-minded Progressive Communist-Socialist elitist, and despite all the evil that name Communist entails, he knows how to put on a happy face and slick talk people into an eventual genocide for the cause that he represents. The ability to smile and lie to people, and make them follow you gullibly is an essential...and Obama has tapped into that essential, and half the nation hypnotically followed while electronic software chicanery and ACORN stole the remaining votes that absolutely assured his ascension into power...his fraud willingly assisted and enabled by the Mainstream Media.

Is Obama just some slick talking street hustler who can apply the Alinsky principles, but academically he just can't cut it? We don't know, because instead of transparency, Obama won't release his school transcripts.

Did he, Obama, average as a D+ student in Occidental and Columbia, and get carried to Harvard, and then have someone at Harvard do his homework for him? What was Obama's SAT and entrance exam scores? We don't know, he won't release the transcripts.

So for all we know, we have a puppet president controlled by a half dozen people or more, including Valerie Jarrett, Vice President Biden, Rahm Emmanuel, Dave Axelrod (all taking orders from unknown others) and others around him at the White House which he illegally occupies through felony fraud, high crimes, and misdemeanors. From Occidental to Harvard, was Obama bumped along because of his ethnicity and rich influencial donors to the Universities he allegedly attended? Is that what is going on, rather than a leader who delegates to the Committee of Czars, and the Committee reports to its leaders, as the Tulane Executive Summary Experiment told us how they would go about restructuring power?

We don't know, it was never investigated thoroughly.

In 2008, Foxnews reported that they had asked 400 of Barack's same year classmates at Columbia, including those who allegedly took the same classes Obama took, and not one remembered Barack...not a single person. Also looking for witnesses were reporters from both the New york Times and the New York Sun newspapers. Yet, no witnesses, reported WorldNetDaily. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?pageId=100613

They were all oblivious to Barack attending Columbia, sitting in any of the same classes, and so forth. So did Barack even "attend"? Or was he ghost written in a whole bunch of classes. We don't know, he won't release the transcript so that we can have journalists ask actual fellow class attendees and ex-teachers.

Strange that not one, not a single university educator has ever come forth to brag that they once taught Barack and had the proof. Why is that? Only first grade teachers in Indonesia, and other elementary school teachers at Punahou, but no University is willing to claim the "honor" of having taught Barack and come forth about it? Why?

Neither can we affirm nor deny this reasonable and possible reconstruction, that Barack was helped along because of excuses made for him to be promoted when he may or may not have been deserving...and neither WILL Obama refute such a charge and fully release his school transcripts, lest he lose his office of usurpation.
The reasoning appears substantiated by Obama himself, spending more than 1.5 million dollars of his Political monies (private donations meant for other purposes) from October 2008 through 2009 in legal fees to fight the transcript and Long Form Birth Certificate release in courts...that in regard to the School transcripts, it is especially because at Occidental, he will likely have received what was then a "foreign national student" status and a scholarship that says to that effect. That is a 1.5 million dollar plus rip-off --

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=106138 reports 1.4 million before August 2009

-- on his own donors to cover up more fraud, it seems to me.

If Obama releases the transcripts, then it follows that he can legally be required to release his Long Form Birth Certificate in accordance with 1948's Bute v. Illinois @ 653 and 2001's Nguyen @54 and 62, and then his alien status of being a Kenyan Natural Born Citizen through his Kenyan National Father who was also a dual British Commonwealth citizen comes out, and Obama not only must resign, but every law since January 20, 2009 can be reversed by the US Supreme Court. Then we can sing...



Amen?

That would be the kind of victory that we must strive to see, legally and peacefully. That's my input.