Should you take the COVID-19 jab? NO.

Should you take the COVID-19 jab?  NO.  That is, if you do NOT intend on being MURDERED by Big PHARMA or agreeing to an assisted suicide, or at the very least being rounded out of a future Societal compact that views you as a non-human or mutant alteration who no longer is a “Citizen”, but rather a copyrighted lump of flesh subject to the whims of the new Communistic Fascism Governance (CFG).

1 800 879 3477 Option 1  Pfizer states that

Pfizer Biotech  Vaccine [ which is NOT a Vaccine, but  Gene Modification ]

is NOT USDA approved nor US FDA licensed.  

In Israel, Pfizer & Moderna Gene modification bio-tech shots for COVID-19 are admitted as human experiments, a mass population lab phase

https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/294594

that is supposed to precede release to the public.  Astra-Zeneca, whose adverse reactions are causing an almost immediate AIDS, immediate permanent blindness in some (United Kingdom especially), and other bad side effects is no better.  

 Just imagine getting the shot & going into immediate bloody convulsions like the ff video shows.

https://www.brighteon.com/36dd834e-197a-455e-9748-2962a289131a

 How many deaths & what kinds of deaths by these shots are being under-reported? Who needs trains and barbed-wire & concentration camps when what may be future labeled as "The New Eugenics" removes all that hassle in a nice clean doctor's office or hospital? 

There are genetic research PH.D.'s such as those who worked on mRNA as part of their doctorates at Harvard, who are telling those in Netherlands 

 https://archive.org/details/dr-louise-explains-messenger-RNA-and-RNA-vaccines

& Canada that an artificial  reprogramming of this bio-tech is inserted into cells to create a protein to then attack it.  After it finishes one enemy, it then views other human proteins as enemies. 

 There are predictions by Big Tech leaders that a new wave of COVID will kill 30,000,000 Americans beginning in the Fall of 2021. In order to increase the fear factor and dis-associate the jab as the cause and the deaths as the effect, we will likely now see a relaxing of the COVID-19 hysteria, a vamping up of "get the safe shot" propaganda when it is like asking a World War 2 Concentration Camp to place his Luger to the back of your head and give you the "safe shot" and cure you of your infirmities they of the Socialist Regime inflicted on you.  The Nazi death shot was more swift in that way, the medical tyranny death shot will have the same ill health effect of living in a starvation Nazi Death camp with more agonizing ill health effects without the need for a Concentration Camp.  Medical services merely need to be refused and you can be told to go die at home if you are a mutant...someone who has altered their DNA structure by the "gene therapy" using the DNA of two unborn baby / fetal tissues synthetically cloned.  

By taking the gene therapy shot, once only allowed for last stage terminal cancer patients, you give up your citizenship and your are a copyrighted and OWNED property of the new Communistic Fascism Governance (CFG) or one of its recognized corporate subsidiaries of Governance (such as Pfizer or Moderna) in their way of thinking, it seems.  Enforcement of this will likely be execution at will by a new system of compliance relocation officers, who can knock on your door, draw you and your family outside, execute you, and minutes later, after a sweep team removes papers and photos, a new pre-screened ownership rides up, signs or somehow electronically acknowledges new lease agreements to take possession from the compliance officer on scene, and walks in & gets possession of all.  Neater, quicker, more absolute than when the German Government threw its own citizens out their own homes and apartments  for illegal Muslim migrants.  Germany imported a pig population who tend to ignore toilets and crap and urinate in the corners of their apartments and tear up furniture like wild dogs and turn clean and sanitary homes into pig styes.  But then, the New World Order sees this as a fundamental step to societal breakdown to control the will of society by idiotically creating mob factions that are more of a cost control burden than they could ever be worth.  

Under Federal law "21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3,

 “Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies”:
(ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed
(I) that the Secretary [of Health and Human Services] has authorized the emergency use of the product;
(II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and
(III) of the option to accept or
REFUSE

administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of
refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the
product that are available and of their benefits and risks."

In legal cases:

Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly, 533 U.S. 525 (2001) @ 570-571, determined that a federal health scheme can trump a state public health law

see also:

Department of the Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518 (1988) @530.

No State official nor private employer can legally FORCE an Emergency Use toxic cocktail on you under current FEDERAL laws. The FDA did NOT issue any emergency dispensing orders, so they don't even have THAT claim either.

 Under Doe#1 v Rumsfeld, 2005 U.S. Dist. Lexis 5573 (D.D.C. Apr. 6, 2005) vacs cannot be "Emergency Use Authorization" (EUA) mandated, even to the military...but they are NOW doing it to the gullible & uniformed, aren't they? Fortunately, about 1/3 of the US Military has become aware and say they will RIGHTLY refuse the gene therapy death shot, many at the risk of being discharged.  That is a correct thing to do, if need be.  Better than being delayed reaction suicided in n3 to 36 months by a medical tyranny run amok.  

Pfizer & Moderna gene therapy can cripple the USA’s Defense & Infrastructure work-force in about a year's time by delayed reaction, perhaps even kill a significant percent of the workforce off. by incorrectly calling it a "vaccine", under U.S. Vaccine protection laws Pfizer & Moderna get NO financial nor criminal charge repercussions for doing so Genocide 2.0 on US Citizenry. None.It is all a Shadow Government sold out to Rockefeller/Rothschild big banks and China directed conspiracy to fully overthrow the United States from within by those given over to Deep Corruption and Treason at the middle and top levels of what used to be our Constitutional Federal Government.  WE THE PEOPLE have NOT given up our Contract, the Bill of Rights of the US Constitution, even though THEY of the Communistic Fascism Governance (CFG) have.  

To say that the mRNA toxic shots – which are mislabeled as vaccines

https://banned.video/watch?id=60076fda8c03b74ce0e2f6f5

https://www.lewrockwell.com/2021/02/joseph-mercola/covid-19-mrna-shots-are-legally-not-vaccines/

https://mercola.fileburst.com/PDF/ExpertInterviewTranscripts/DrMercola-JudyMikovits-COVID-19-Vaccination.pdf

-- are safe is medically NOT true.

We are being information suppressed of depopulation stats, and infrequently told when news does pass the media gate-keepers such as when Pfizer gene-therapy murders 1 in 3 or 46 of 145 residents of a Spanish nursing home.

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/46-residents-in-spanish-nursing-home-die-after-receiving-covid-19-vaccine

That gene therapy is doing what it is designed to do…to kill.

Injecting a synthetic genetic code RE-WRITE based on 2 unborn baby genetic codes is NOT SAFE.  Anyone taking the unlicensed and unapproved by the FDA toxic shot (Pfizer or Moderna COVID-19 “vaccine”)  is basically doing the same thing that happens when a virus is put into a computer, an alien to the original program is injected into the DNA to make it do something that it was not designed to do nor compatible to do, and eventually there is a shutdown, a crash, a death of the computer…and in our case, the human being.    

Even if we were given a Vaccine instead of a gene therapy, the cure is worse than the non-cure because of the likelihood of Antibody Dependent Enhancement issues. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7311339/

Spike protein issues associated with the COVID-19 Vaccine are on the rise among medical professionals.

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/wp-content/uploads/Whelan-FDA-letter-re-EAU-Pfizer-.pdf

 Zinc is a virus inhibitor.  It is cheap. I advise anyone who wants to stay healthy to buy and daily take this supplement as needed multiple times a day.  Doses as high as 180 - 200 mg might not be unusual, depending on body mass.  Temporary occasions of sickness might call for more, 240 to 300 mg, but generally at least 100 mg a day is recommended. You neither want deficiency nor zinc toxicity, so do the research and take what is the right amount daily for you.  Some may only need 30 mg a day, some 50mg.  We all vary.  Be cognizant of that.

For those stuck on Covid hysteria, I hope they will be aware that the CDC admits that only 6% of those diagnosed with COVID-19 actually have it….which means a 94% of those reported are FALSE positives,

 https://jdfor2020.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/adf864_165a103206974fdbb14ada6bf8af1541.pdf

especially when the PCRs not designed to test are ramped up 45 times so that even all tap water tests COVID-19 positive…so for the Covid fearful, there needs to be a re-think. 

The whole COVID-19 panic we are in now, with the lockdowns & continued masks & unnecessary economy destroying practices after the initial several months & passing of the Wuhan Lab 5 China-virus (made of Corona virus, Bat virus, & HIV virus) is following much of the Rockefeller assisted White Paper called:

Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development

https://www.nommeraadio.ee/meedia/pdf/RRS/Rockefeller%20Foundation.pdf

The first scenario, titled, “Lock Step”, describes a world of total government control and authoritarian leadership. It envisions a future where a pandemic would allow national leaders to flex their authority and impose airtight rules and restrictions that would remain after the pandemic faded. The first half of this scenario already has unfolded.

https://archive.org/details/dr-louise-explains-messenger-RNA-and-RNA-vaccines

 

FDA ‘Misled the Public’ on Pfizer Vaccine Efficacy

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccines-administrators-must-inform-risks/

 

Since COVID Vaccines Are Experimental, Vaccine Administrators Must Inform You of Risks

https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/covid-vaccines-administrators-must-inform-risks/

 

COVID-19 RNA Based Vaccines and the Risk of Prion Disease

J. Bart Classen, MD, Classen Immunotherapies, Inc., 3637 Rockdale Road, Manchester, MD 21102, Tel: 410-377-8526.

https://scivisionpub.com/pdfs/covid19-rna-based-vaccines-and-the-risk-of-prion-disease-1503.pdf

“In this paper the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine was evaluated for the potential to induce prion-based disease in vaccine recipients. The RNA sequence of the vaccine as well as the spike protein target interaction were analyzed for the potential to convert intracellular RNA binding proteins TAR DNA binding protein (TDP-43) and Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) into their pathologic prion conformations. The results indicate that the vaccine RNA has specific sequences that may induce TDP-43 and FUS to fold into their pathologic prion confirmations. In the current analysis a total of sixteen UG tandem repeats (ΨGΨG) were identified and additional UG (ΨG) rich sequences were identified. Two GGΨA sequences were found. Potential G Quadruplex sequences are possibly present but a more sophisticated computer program is needed to verify these. Furthermore, the spike protein, created by the translation of the vaccine RNA, binds angiotensin converting enzyme 2 (ACE2), a zinc containing enzyme. This interaction has the potential to increase intracellular zinc. Zinc ions have been shown to cause the transformation of TDP-43 to its pathologic prion configuration. The folding of TDP-43 and FUS into their pathologic prion confirmations is known to cause ALS, front temporal lobar degeneration, Alzheimer’s disease and other neurological degenerative diseases. The enclosed finding as well as additional potential risks leads the author to believe that regulatory approval of the RNA based vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 was premature and that the vaccine may cause much more harm than benefit.”

 

https://www.naturalnews.com/2021-02-24-france-slows-down-covid-vaccinations-healthcare-workers-falling-ill.html

Using Astra-Zeneca, the University Hospital of Brest in Brittany France had 20- 25% of its medical staff downed by adverse reactions to the COVID-19 shots and France is ordering a slow-down of the shots because Vaccine Injury is now normal & the prevention of staff shortages of those COVID-19 shotted out of the workforce is the new normal. If they are downed but NOT hospitalized immediately as a result, the Government of France blows it off (just like in the USA) and discards cause & effect or that non-hospitalizition & inability to report to work side effects DON’T COUNT. 

https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/france-considers-slowing-vaccine-rollout-for-hospital-staff-with-many-unable-to-work-following-jab

 

Moderna’s mRNA injections are an “operating system” designed to program humans and hack their biological functions

https://www.vaccines.news/2021-01-04-moderna-vaccine-designed-to-program-humans.html

 

Horrific latent deaths predicted among the elderly by genetics professor after immunization with RNA vaccines

https://www.vaccines.news/2021-01-28-latent-deaths-predicted-after-immunization-rna-vaccines.html

 

 Dr. James Lyons-Weiler states that since ALL  SARS-CoV-2 immunogenic epitopes except for one are similar to human proteins, taking any COVID-19 shot / jab or what have you, WILL eventually  induce some degree of life-threatening autoimmunity.

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589909020300186?via%3Dihub

In fact, full blown Alzheimer’s by ages 50-55 is projected for 30 years olds who actually survive the gene therapy shots by decades (should they be able to live so long afterwards).

 The UK has a magical number of 1 in 10 adverse reactions of any and all COVID-19 shots (which immediately means red flag & be on the alert for these being fraudulent stats) that are never allowed to reported as other than mild adverse side effects. 

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting

 

At present, the (CFG) is now switching gears, and releasing some of the mask wearing in some states as they prepare to move into the Carbon Crisis Lockdowns, and tax carbon in all its forms, even a breathing tax on you, your pets, and so on.   Be pro-active in defending yourself against those who would forcibly give you the Covid Death Shot and deceive you with the same lie the Serpent told Eve in the Garden of Eden, "You shall surely not die...but ye shall be as gods...." (Genesis 3;5)  Adam and Eve lost their second soul that GOD implanted of himself in them, an eternal life post-physical death guarantor soul that now can only be reinserted by faith into Jesus Christ and what He did at the Cross and that died, resurrected, ascended back to Heaven & is coming again provides.  Don't be deceived by taking the shot that will give you AIDS or some sickness that fulfills the Deagel Report prediction that eliminates 220,000,000 plus from the United States (down to a 99 million population, while protecting India and China populations to near current levels) in the next 4 years (by 2025).  

 Heed the warning:

DON'T TAKE THE COVID-19 SHOT!

 

 

Guest Blog: Under Federal Law, Can Your Employer Make You Get the COVID Vaccine? [No. NOT currently, but litigation & new laws to come may eventually circumvent that.]

Under Federal Law, Can Your Employer Make You Get the COVID Vaccine?

States and employers, under federal law, can’t mandate emergency use products such as the Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines. But that doesn’t mean some won’t try.

By

Greg Glaser, Esq.

Mary Holland

 

Are state governments and private employers about to mandate COVID-19 vaccines?

There are many opaque current and future legal issues around COVID-19 and the measures to contain it. Fortunately, because the Pfizer and Moderna vaccines are emergency use products, and as such, not fully licensed, the law is clear: States may not mandate the vaccines, and private entities do so at the peril of violating federal law.

The law governing vaccines approved for emergency use

For the time being, there are only two COVID-19 vaccines available in the United States: the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and the Moderna vaccine. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued them both Emergency Use Authorizations (EAU) but not yet full vaccine licenses.

New York State Assemblywoman Linda Rosenthal recently proposed a bill to mandate COVID-19 vaccines, but she apparently neglected to consult federal law on emergency use authorization.

“Emergency Use Authorization” means that any product with this designation must be voluntary. 

Under 21 U.S.C. § 360bbb-3, “Authorization for medical products for use in emergencies”:

(ii) Appropriate conditions designed to ensure that individuals to whom the product is administered are informed —

     (I) that the Secretary [of Health and Human Services] has authorized the emergency use of the product;

    (II) of the significant known and potential benefits and risks of such use, and of the extent to which such benefits and risks are unknown; and

    (III) of the option to accept or refuse administration of the product, of the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product, and of the alternatives to the product that are available and of their benefits and risks.

Under federal preemption doctrine, this federal EUA law trumps state law, meaning that states and municipalities may not mandate EUA products. As the FDA states:

“FDA believes that the terms and conditions of an EUA issued under section 564 preempt state or local law, both legislative requirements and common-law duties, that impose different or additional requirements on the medical product for which the EUA was issued in the context of the emergency declared under section 564 … In an emergency, it is critical that the conditions that are part of the EUA or an order or waiver issued pursuant to section 564A — those that FDA has determined to be necessary or appropriate to protect the public health—be strictly followed, and that no additional conditions be imposed.”

This was also confirmed in August 2020 at a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention published meeting of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices, where its Executive Secretary Dr, Amanda Cohn, stated (@1:14:40):

“I just wanted to add that, just wanted to remind everybody, that under an Emergency Use Authorization, an EUA, vaccines are not allowed to be mandatory. So, early in this vaccination phase, individuals will have to be consented and they won’t be able to be mandated.”

Governors may not mandate EUA vaccines, or EUA tests for COVID infection. States cannot override federal law or set up their own mandatory scheme. See for example, Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly, 533 U.S. 525, 570-71 (2001), which overturned a state public health law because it was already the subject of a comprehensive federal scheme to manage public health, and Department of the Navy v. Egan, 484 U.S. 518, 530 (1988). 

For more information on state and local law, see this Emergency Use Authorization Toolkit from the Association of State and Territorial Health Officials.

What about private employers?

A private party, such as an employer, school or hospital, cannot circumvent the EUA law. For example, this Fact Sheet approved last month by the FDA for the Pfizer vaccine states:

“It is your choice to receive or not receive the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine. Should you decide not to receive it, it will not change your standard medical care.”

The previously referenced section of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act governing medical products approved for emergency states that the FDA-approved fact sheet must state “the consequences, if any, of refusing administration of the product.”

Nowhere in the fact sheet does it specify that a person may be fired from their employment, denied education, disciplined or otherwise discriminated against for refusal.

With that said, the law on private entities is likely to be litigated. Even the most ardent advocates for COVID vaccines acknowledge that employer mandates would be “problematic” and would likely lead to litigation.

One of the initial issues in litigation would be that EUA law applies to “a person who carries out any activity for which the authorization is issued.” While this phrase plainly refers to healthcare workers, i.e. those who vaccinate the public, it can also refer to anyone who participates in the EUA activity, such as employers requiring the product (see e.g., reference below to private employers as “program planners”).

The FDA even applies the term to those that advertise the product. So courts are likely to find that EUA law covers employers carrying out their own vaccination requirements, as well as states and municipalities.

But what if a private employer stubbornly refuses to heed the EUA law and attempts to require its employees to get EUA vaccines anyway?

Employers are likely to lose if challenged in court for the above-stated reasons, and also because the FDA did not issue an Emergency Dispensing Order to even attempt to circumvent EUA requirements.

Indeed, the EUA law preventing mandates is so explicit that we found only one precedent case regarding an attempt to mandate an EUA vaccine, and the court held that the vaccine could not be mandated, even to people in the military. In Doe #1 v. Rumsfeld, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 5573 (D.D.C. Apr. 6, 2005).

In that case, six soldiers challenged the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD), which at the time mandated EUA anthrax vaccines, often leading to what has been called Gulf War Syndrome. Six soldiers sued DOD to refuse vaccination and won. A federal court held that because the anthrax vaccine was an EUA product, the soldiers had the right to accept or refuse vaccination.

It’s a solid precedent showing that because a federal court upheld soldiers’ rights to decline EUA vaccines, it’s likely that courts would uphold employees’ rights to refuse EUA vaccines as well.

The FDA Fact Sheet for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine states:

“It is your choice to receive or not receive the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine. Should you decide not to receive it, it will not change your standard medical care.” In other words, people cannot lose healthcare coverage for refusal.

But again, what if a private employer mandates EUA vaccines anyway? Official statements suggest that the employer might lose liability protection against damages from vaccine injury.

According to the Congressional Research Service, private businesses are subject to civil liability unless they “acted consistent with applicable directions, guidelines, or recommendations by the Secretary regarding the administration or use of a covered countermeasure” [and] “private businesses may qualify as ‘program planners’ (and thus covered persons) when performing certain functions).”

EUAs for past medical emergencies are instructive. In 2009, when the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) declared the H1N1 virus emergency, the FDA authorized the emergency use of the drug Peramivir IV. The fact sheet stated that the healthcare provider should communicate to the patient:

1. The Secretary of HHS has authorized the emergency use of Peramivir IV, which is not an FDA approved drug.
2. The patient has the option to accept or refuse Peramivir IV.

   The Informed Consent Action Network’s legal team is offering to help individuals challenge employers or schools that are requiring COVID vaccinations. You can find more information here.

   To download the Children’s Health Defense new e-book on vaccine mandates, go here.

   
   

   

   Greg Glaser, Esq.

   Greg Glaser, J.D. is a vaccine rights attorney with a litigation and transactional law background.

   

   Mary Holland

   Mary Holland is president of Children's Health Defense. She was research scholar and director of the Graduate Legal Skills Program at New York University School of Law. She is a founding board member of EBCALA.

   Source:  https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/under-federal-law-can-your-employer-make-you-get-covid-vaccine/