Welcome! Jesus Christ is my LORD and Savior! Romans 10:9-10,13; John 3:16

[For EU visitors, I do not personally use cookies, but Google or any clickable link (if you choose to click on it) might. This is in compliance with mandatory EU notification]

I am a Natural Born United States Citizen with NO allegiance or citizenship to any nation but my own. I am a born-again Protestant Christian. In the past I have posted vigorous and well sourced proofs that The United States is betrayed Constitutionally regarding select individuals and organizations, and in failing to enforce the Natural Born Citizen clause of the US Constitution regarding the US Presidency. I am removing all political posts because America has abandoned the rule of Law to an outward shell substance and formation that is left in place. I am leaving my religious writings and a few other works as my primary because in the coming Tribulation, only the religious things I have researched and shared will really matter. There will be a few other posts I will leave up, but the rest I unpublished for reference and possible later use. I apologize for the fundamental changes that some will miss. I am going through a Spiritual purging process as a partial series of counter actions to much tribulation I personally am now going through, which is the reason for the changes to whittle down to a mostly religious format. Thank you for understanding.

Thank you for coming.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
In the Year of our LORD Jesus Christ
2025

Thursday, December 12, 2019

Merry Christmas 2019: A Repost by Brianroy



The Gospel of Matthew - The Historical Introduction in the Alternative Word Pictures with Reiterations translation - translation mine (AWPR)


18) Now concerning Jesus Christ:  His coming into being was in this way; Mary, the mother of Him, being betrothed by marriage contract to Joseph, formerly and before their coming together, she was sought out and inquired, and found to be having in the womb, out by the Holy Spirit.1

19) But Joseph, the man betrothed to her, being righteous and just, and not having in mind -- nor the will 2 -- to bring her alongside, to make a public show (of her), for the moment was willing to loose her away (by means of a divorce) secretly, and hide (her) swiftly, without notice. 

20) And as he was increasingly growing in wrath and indignation while dwelling thoughtfully 3 on these things:  Behold!  By a dream, the LORD’s Angel was seen by him, saying
                ‘ Joseph, a legitimate offspring and son of David.   Do not run away
                    in fear, 4 receive and take Miriam as your bride: for that which is
                    come into being in her is out of the Spirit, and Holy.

21)              And she will bring forth and bear a Son and you shall call forth
             His Name as Yeshua  [Jesus], for He will deliver and make whole,
             saving  His people from the sickness and death of their sins.’

22)             This also came into being in order that it might be supplied abundantly and fulfilled, by that spoken with definite words -- the LORD coming forth through the Prophet,5 saying,

23)             ‘Behold!  the virgin of marriageable age who has never known a man,
in the belly will hold and possess,  and will bring forth and bear a Son,
and they will call forth and summon the Name of Him, EMMANUEL:
the which is, being after the interpretation,
          ‘’In the midst of and among us -- GOD.’’6

24)             And Joseph, being excited in mind and body, and being fully awoken from the sloth and weariness 7 of his slumber, he set about and completed those actions in what manner or way (that was) expressly set and ordered him 8 by the LORD’s angel, and took possession of his wife;
25)             and did not completely know her until she brought forth and bore her Son, the Firstborn.    And he called forth and summoned the Name of Him:  Yeshua  [Jesus].”

            Notes on Matthew 1:18-25

1               This sentence as translated by the full Greek expression of word pictures, show that Miriam (Mary) was about to be taken up by her husband when she was discovered with child.  In all likelihood, it was either the appointed priest or it was  the advance ambassador of the betrothed, Joseph’s best man, who would have  the one who sought and inquired (as this verse tells us).  It is not held against Eli, Miriam’s father, nor against Miriam herself, that she is pregnant.  In fact, the conclusion points to Miriam as being part of a large household where she is never left alone.  It also indicates that she is the oldest of at least several daughters, and surrounded by overprotective aunts, or like female relatives.  If we read the passage correctly, there may be a suggestion that Miriam was sold to Joseph while as a child, prior to her reaching a state of maturity.  This is supported by the tone of the following verse, 19, in which Joseph is spoken in the manner of an old or mature individual, and Miriam as but a young girl.   

2               βουλομαι -  is willingness, as found in the moment.  That “will”  which has intent and purpose and longevity, being a continuous and active expression, is “thelo” in the Greek.  Boulomai is a mindful will that can change with a mood swing.  This is exactly what was happening with Joseph.  

3                ενθυμηθεντος  : en - meaning “in”, and thumos - the mind that is racing in agitation, indignation, anger, wrath, etc.  The scribes who are indignant, and think within how that Jesus blasphemes (Matthew 9:4), or those Pharisees who are hateful and indignant in their minds (Matthew 12:25) so as to call Jesus in league with Beelzebub, are further examples are the correctness of my translation of this verse.

4               φοβηθης  -  to terribly frighten.  In the Classical Greek,  Phobeo was used to describe those so terrified, that they ran away out of their minds with fear.  The Hebrew “charada” is closely associated with this type of fear, which also is what is told the women at the Resurrection tomb in Matthew 28:5 - “Do not fear so as to run away!”

5               Isaiah 7:14

6               Actual literal translation of   Μεθ  ημων  θεος.  In this context, as in Matthew 26:58, Peter sits “in the midst of”  the under-officers of the high priest, but not necessarily “with”. 

7                διεγερθεις -  “egeiro” which means ‘to rise up, to awake from sleep,’  -- intensified by “dia” -‘through’.  Mark and Luke use this descriptive word to tell of how deep a slumber Jesus was in during the raging of the wind and sea of Galilee (Mark 4:38; Luke 8:24); while John applies it to the intensity of the sea itself, as if awoken from the sleep of calmness (John 8:18).  This intensive of “egeiro” is  used again in 2 Peter, where Peter is trying to shake the sloth and slumber from the weary minds of those who believe, that they might intensely become awake to the message he  is imparting  before he dies (2 Peter 1:13, 3:1).

8                 προςεταζεν  - to arrange by or through commands, and to set in order.  In Matthew 21:6, the disciples follow the command and instruction of this word,  set about to carry out the dictum: “Go into the village opposite you, and immediately you will find an ass tied up with a colt, untie them and bring them about and lead them to Me.”  (Matthew 21:2) 




The Gospel of Luke  
  
[written circa 50 A.D. while Peter and Paul jointly preached in Corinth of Achaia]
  
2:8-21 in KJV and AWPR Translations

  
King James Version (KJV)

Alternative Word Pictures with Reiterations translation - translation mine (AWPR)

   

8 And there were in the same country shepherds abiding in the field, keeping watch over their flock by night.  (KJV) 
  

(8)     And Shepherds were in the fields and grazing ranges of 

          the country-side,

          the same (also) abiding / lodging in the fields

          (with the flocks [of sheep])

          and keeping a doubly protective guarded watch of the night

          over the flock  of them.

          (AWPR)



9 And, lo, the angel of the Lord came upon them, and the glory of the Lord shone round about them: and they were sore afraid. (KJV) 

(9)     And behold, look and see,

an Angel (of the) LORD stood above and over them,

          and (the) LORD’s glory shone forth [great light] around them;

          and they were terrified with such a fright so as to run away,

          [it being such a mentally and spiritually overwhelming] 

             great fleeing terror.

          (AWPR)



10 And the angel said unto them, Fear not: for, behold, I bring you good tidings of great joy, which shall be to all people.  (KJV)
  
(10)   But the Angel said to them,

          (Although you can)

‘Do not fear or be terrified with such a fright so as to run away.

              Behold, look and see,

               for I am giving forth a good proclamation of good tidings,

    of good news to you,

               which will be to the people a great joyous exultation;

          (AWPR)


  
11 For unto you is born this day in the city of David a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord.   (KJV)

(11)             because was born to you    this day / today

                    a Savior / Deliverer (from destruction) and benefactor

                    who is Christ / (the Anointed (One),

                    LORD / YHVeH / JeHoVaH,

                    in the city of David. 

          (AWPR)


  
12 And this shall be a sign unto you; Ye shall find the babe wrapped in swaddling clothes, lying in a manger.   (KJV)
  
(12)             And this to you is a miraculous (and visible) Sign /

                    proof of a Miracle Of Fulfillment:

                    you will search out – inquire and find a (nourishing) baby

                    having been enwrapped about as in a band

         in a swathing / in swaddling clothes,

          laid down – placed – set in a stall.

                  [alternatively: a feeding trough].

                  (AWPR)



 13    And suddenly there was with the angel a multitude of the heavenly host praising God, and saying,    (KJV)
  
(13)   And of a sudden – suddenly

          there was together with the Angel

          a fullness – multitude – throng of a Heavenly / Celestial army

          singing praises of approval – benefits – commendations / praising

          GOD,

          and laying down forth definite words, saying:

          (AWPR)




 14 Glory to God in the highest, and on earth peace, good will toward men.   (KJV)


(14)            ‘Praise – honor – applause duly rendered / Glory

                     in the highest to GOD;

                     and upon Earth,

                     Peace – Tranquility – Rest – and Every Kind Of Good;

                     in men, benevolent pleasing favor – kindness  and good will.’

          (AWPR)




15 And it came to pass, as the angels were gone away from them into heaven, the shepherds said one to another, Let us now go even unto Bethlehem, and see this thing which is come to pass, which the Lord hath made known unto us.    (KJV)


(15)   And it so happened in what manner or way,

          the angels withdrew and went away / departed

          from them into the Heaven.

         

          And the men, the Shepherds, 

          spoke up alongside and with one another,  (saying),

                   ‘Let us most definitely (now) pass through and go

                    as far as / unto Bethlehem,

                    and let us behold, see and know 

                   this pronouncement / command,

                    that having occurred and come into being,

                    the which the LORD / JeHoVaH / YHVeH

                    made known / revealed unto us.’

          (AWPR)



 16 And they came with haste, and found Mary, and Joseph, and the babe lying in a manger.   (KJV)

 (16)   And they came forth so as to make a public appearance,

          urging themselves on hastily – quickly,

          and diligently sought and found out both Mariam / Mary and Joseph

          and the newborn child / baby  lying down in a stall

                             [alternatively: a feeding tough].

          (AWPR)

  
17 And when they had seen it, they made known abroad the saying which was told them concerning this child.   (KJV)

 17)   Then seeing and being made aware with understanding,

          they went around making it known regarding the

          Statement / Pronouncement / Command spoken to them

          regarding this child.

          (AWPR) 

  
18 And all they that heard it wondered at those things which were told them by the shepherds.   (KJV)
    

(18)   And all those hearing and listening intently

          were struck with astonishment and marveled / wondered

          regarding / concerning the thing spoken about the Shepherds

          (who were) up alongside and with them.

          (AWPR)

  
19 But Mary kept all these things, and pondered them in her heart.   (KJV)


(19)   Then Mariam / Mary

kept considering – pondering – mulling over – meditating

(upon) these spoken words / sayings, in the heart of her.

           (AWPR)


  

20 And the shepherds returned, glorifying and praising God for all the things that they had heard and seen, as it was told unto them.   (KJV)

  
(20)   And the Shepherds turned about and returned,

                   

            [alternatively: Gr. epistrephan also means “having converted”]
  

(verbally and publicly [with loudness])

recognizing – honoring – glorifying and singing praises to GOD

for / upon / regarding all (the) things

which they attentively heard and beheld / saw,

even as (it) was spoken / proclaimed up to and alongside with them.

(AWPR)

  


21 And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called Jesus, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb.   (KJV)
  
(21)   And when were fulfilled – completed – accomplished

          (made fully past) 8 days to circumcise the baby,

          moreover was called forth the name of Him, Jesus / Yeshua;

          that called forth / That called from through the Angel

          before He was conceived in the womb.

          (AWPR)  







In Judaism, there is the theological topic of Tikkun Olam, the “Restorative Repairing  (hence, “redemption”)  of the World / Ages.”     The Hebrew word Tikkun, by a secondary definition, will  incorporate the idea of  an ascending “spark” or flame, as if part of an burnt offering that  ascends up to GOD. Therefore, to be repaired or restored, one must make oneself as if a light of the menorah, or as a living allegory of the burnt offering (a living sacrifice) unto GOD.

Therefore, the basic concept of Tikkun Olam can be immediately recognized by many born-again Christians who read the priestly Gospel of John (1:1-13) where Jesus, as the light and spark of eternal life, lights the dead pilot --

(some may want to envision a gas burner or gas burning space heater that remains unlit until sparked on to give heat and fulfill its destined function in order to better grasp this concept)

-- that is within every man - woman - child of whosoever believes into and receives Him. 


If we apply this concept to Christ's Mass / Christmas, we can see in the historical retelling of the event of the star that led the magi from the East, that effectually the star itself, be it a preternatural Constellation or a manifesting Angel, was signifying the same concept as pointing the way to He who was the true spark and redemption of the World / Ages, Christ Jesus the Messiah whom is clearly named Yeshua in various Salvation Scriptures in the Hebrew Passages of the Bible for any willing to simply accept the Scriptures instead of debating GOD on a "How dare you name the King Messiah the same as the one whom the Gentile Christians follow."  




Micah 5:2  
“And you, Bethlehem Ephratah,
(though you) have grown into being least and insignificant
while being among the Commanders of the Thousands of Judah;   



{read “alupe”, construct plural; not alepe}


(yet) out of you to Me,  He shall come forth to become
Compared like unto Me in a Proverb,   
                 { Numbers 21:17-18b*}


ruling with dominion in Israel;
And his forth coming origin as one going out
is from the days of eternity, since before the world (came into being).”





Matthew 2:6
“And you, Bethlehem, Land of Judah,
Not by any means least in rank, dignity, or importance are you
Among the leaders of Judah who rule as Commanders
Who exercise authority by means of both military and civil law;



Out of you for will come out and go forth from His place
A leader who will rule as a Commander
And who will exercise authority by means of both military and civil law;

Who will Shepherd the people of Me, Israel.”   



{and be their King,   2 Sam. 5:2}


----------------------------------------------------
*Numbers 21:17-18b  
17 Then Israel sang this song, Spring up, O well; sing ye unto it:
18 The  Cistern Well which the princes dug,
Which dug the nobles of the people,
by  the (direction of  the )  Commander of the statutes – laws –customs –decrees, with their staves.”           



"Behold!  GOD is my JESUS!
I will trust and not be afraid, for my strength and my song is YH YHVeH,
and He became to me, JESUS.
And you shall draw water with joy
out of the flowing mountain spring of JESUS."
  - Isaiah 12:2-3




In Micah 5:2, we read that the "comings forth" as umootsata(y)v  is as the source going forth, as though referring to a well spring which origin is unseen, and practically unknowable except in generality.

That origin is M'Qedem memey olam...from before the days of eternity, from before the days of the world.   

In Isaiah 7:14, we have "The Virgin" or Ha Almah in regard to the use of the word for "virgin".   Almah speaks of a "hiddenness", a chaste purity, lest perhaps someone would say as in Deuteronomy 22:19, the virgin verse of Isaiah 7:14  could ever speak of a Bethulah as one (a woman) having already had intercourse.   This is why we have Almah in Isaiah 7:14, a VIRGIN in the true sense of the word, whereas also Bethulah might be argued against as not being a virgin if the female is past age 12 (or something to this effect)  as the Akkadian cognate (the origin of the Hebrew word Bethulah)  informs us in regard to what the original origin of the word Bethulah concerned itself with.
Again, in the Akkadian, the related Bethulah cognate will only translate to virginity when applied to the very youthful; while in the Ugaritic, the possible  root  "btlt" is a oft a reference to the wife of Baal, who indeed has an active sex life in the mythology regarding Baal and Anat.   That kind of idolatrous association would be avoided by Scripture, even if human organizations later chose to merge pagan patterns and holidays where the Bible utterly separates itself from such idolatry and immoral practices as idol worshipers engage in.


 In many ways, First Century Judaism and Christianity were almost as close as some Protestant denominations are from one another in our day.


We see that many of the ideas between First Century Judaism and First Century Christianity easily cross over as virtually synonymous but for the identification of a definitive Messiah.   In our day, the division or lack of tolerance to one another is often more popular than it was in Christianity's first 35 - 40 years.








Matthew Chapter 2 in the King James Version (KJV) and Alternate with Word Pictures and Reiterations Version (AWPR)


Matthew Chapter 2

King James Version (KJV)

Alternate Word Pictures with Reiterations (AWPR) - Translation mine.



1 Now when Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men from the east to Jerusalem, (KJV)


     1)       Then Jesus / Yeshua, having been born in Bethlehem of Judea

in the days of Herod the king:

Behold, look and see;

Magi from (the) rising sun – from (the) dawn – 
     from (the) East

(publicly and noticeably) arrived into Jerusalem, 

 (AWPR)




2 Saying, Where is he that is born King of the Jews? for we have seen his star in the east, and are come to worship him. (KJV)

2)      Uttering definite words – saying:

          ‘In what place – Where is He (whom is) brought forth – born

            King of the Jews?

            For – Because   we beheld – saw – observed – watched

            the luminous body – the star of Him 
            in the East,                

            and came forth publicly so as to make an appearance

            to kiss – to adore – to show respect 
                  and falling/ prostrating obeisance

                  -  to worship him.

           (AWPR)





3 When Herod the king had heard these things, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem with him.  (KJV) 

3)      Then (paying heed and) hearing intently – listening 
          (carefully),

Herod the king

was stirred up and agitated / troubled 
with great fear and questions,

and all of Jerusalem with him.   

(AWPR)





4 And when he had gathered all the chief priests and scribes of the people together, he demanded of them where Christ should be born.  (KJV)

4)    And gathering – assembling together

the first / chief priests and Scribes




[Scribes - includes scribes who copy the Torah, Accountants,

and Civil Servant / Officials that were Recorders, Librarians,
 and other various forms of Book or Document Keepers
 (including tax-collectors like   
 Matthew, author of this Gospel).]

            of the people,

            he asked – inquired – examined from them

            where – in what place the Christ was to be born.  

(AWPR)



5 And they said unto him, In Bethlehem of Judaea: for thus it is written by the prophet, (KJV)

5)     Then they said – spoke – replied to him,

          ‘In Bethlehem of Judea,

          for thus – in this manner or way

          it has been 
          engraved – inscribed – carved – written

            through the prophet,     

(AWPR)



6 And thou Bethlehem, in the land of Juda, art not the least among the princes of Juda: for out of thee shall come a Governor that shall rule my people Israel.  (KJV)

6)     ‘And you, Bethlehem, land of Judah,

          by no means – not at all

          are you least in rank – dignity – importance

          in – amongst the leaders – rulers – governors of Judah;

          for – because out of you will proceed / come forth

          a leader – chief – commander – ruler,

          someone who will Shepherd the people – nation

          of Me, Israel.  

(AWPR)





7 Then Herod, when he had privily called the wise men, enquired of them diligently what time the star appeared. (KJV)

7)    At that time then, Herod in a manner or way
          concealed from notice –

secretly – discreetly – privately

calling – summoning forth – authoritatively invited

the Magi – the wise men

(and) asked precisely - inquired accurately / inquired exactly

from them the Time – Period – Season

of the shining – illuminating – giving light

[and remaining in that state of excessive illumination]

star – luminous body.   

(AWPR)




8 And he sent them to Bethlehem, and said, Go and search diligently for the young child; and when ye have found him, bring me word again, that I may come and worship him also.  (KJV)

8)    And causing to go – sending them


[implies a military escort for part of the journey 
to ensure they went on the correct road and were 
certainly on their way.  Herod was in Jerusalem 
only 4.1 plus miles to the north, where sending word 
back to him could be done by one servant sent back
 on foot, even walking by lamp or torch by night,
 in just inside one hour]

into Bethlehem, he said,

          ‘Having walked and passed – having gone through,

            accurately examine – exactly with diligence find out –

             inquire thoroughly about

          regarding the little child.



          Then, as soon as – whenever you find and
          search out / discover,

          announce it to – send word to – make known to

          me,  so that I may also come up alongside with (you)

          to worship Him.’     (AWPR) 




Comment on distance:

Justin, in his Apology, 1.34, says:  "And thou, Bethlehem, the land of Judah" etc.  ‘Now there is a village in the land of the Jews, 35 stadia  [4.1 miles] from Jerusalem, in which Jesus Christ was born, as you can [still] ascertain also from the registers of the taxing made under Cyrenius, your first procurator in Judea."  It appears to me that the Inn or House to where Jesus was to be located was in this general vicinity at least a mile closer than the boundaries of modern Bethlehem and in the hills northeast of the current modern city, as yet unexcavated.  That makes sense that if Bethlehem was so crowded that there was no room, they would be forced to make the best they could in the outskirts of the city, at a in Bethlehem point closest to Jerusalem, and yet above the primary dust and smog (that generally settles upon the first 200 feet of a civilization and makes the air tan or brownish as one looks down across a valley or plain of it), it seems to me. 



9 When they had heard the king, they departed; and, lo, the star, which they saw in the east, went before them, till it came and stood over where the young child was.  (KJV)

9)    Then they, having heard and listened to 
          the king carefully – intently

(continued and) passed through – departed.

And behold, look and see;
 the luminous body – the star

which they saw – beheld – observed – watched

in the rising sun – in the dawn – in the East

preceded before and led them forth until, coming,

it stood up above / over and upon

where the little child was.  

(AWPR)



10 When they saw the star, they rejoiced with exceeding great joy. (KJV)

10)    Then seeing – beholding – observing 
          the luminous body / star,

          they rejoiced with great – abundant

           joy – delight – gladness,

          with very much eagerness.  

          (AWPR)



11 And when they were come into the house, they saw the young child with Mary his mother, and fell down, and worshipped him: and when they had opened their treasures, they presented unto him gifts; gold, and frankincense and myrrh.   (KJV)

11)     And coming into the house / building, 1

         They saw – beheld – observed the little child

         with Miriam / Mary the mother of Him.

         And falling down prostrate they 
         adored – showed obeisance to –

         worshiped Him.

         And opening the treasures put – set – stored of them,

         they brought up alongside with / next to – near to Him

         gratuitous – generous  gifts of

         gold and frankincense and myrrh.  

        (AWPR)


        
12 And being warned of God in a dream that they should not return to Herod, they departed into their own country another way.  (KJV)


12)       And having been addressed

         in a very straight-forward business-like warning – oracle

         by a dream that they should not go back again – return

         up alongside with Herod,

         through another of the same kind of way – highway – route

         they departed back again into

         the country – land – region – territory of them.2   (AWPR)



13 And when they were departed, behold, the angel of the Lord appeareth to Joseph in a dream, saying, Arise, and take the young child and his mother, and flee into Egypt, and be thou there until I bring thee word: for Herod will seek the young child to destroy him.   (KJV)


13)      Then they, having left – having departed back again:

                   behold, look and see;

          an angel / messenger of (the) LORD

          shone – gave light / illumination – appeared

                   down in a dream to Joseph,
                  uttering definite words – saying,


              ‘Rise (from sleep and sluggishness) – Rise up!

               take up and seize the little child and the mother of Him,

               and hurriedly flee – escape quickly  into Egypt;

               and be you in that place there

               until I shall speak to you:

               for Herod is at the point of – is about to

               look for and strive to find

               the little child, to kill – put to death – destroy Him.’

               (AWPR)



14 When he arose, he took the young child and his mother by night, and departed into Egypt:  (KJV)


14)    Then he  rising up (from sleep and sluggishness)

          Took up and seized – snatched up 

          The little child and the mother of Him by night,

          And departed back again into Egypt.3

          (AWPR) 



15 And was there until the death of Herod: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying, Out of Egypt have I called my son.  (KJV)


15)    And he was in that place there until

          the end – completion (death) of  Herod,

         in order that would be fulfilled that spoken

         under the LORD through the prophets,

         laying down definite words saying – speaking,

            ‘Out of Egypt I have called / summoned forth

              The Son of Me.’

         (AWPR)



16 Then Herod, when he saw that he was mocked of the wise men, was exceeding wroth, and sent forth, and slew all the children that were in Bethlehem, and in all the coasts thereof, from two years old and under, according to the time which he had diligently inquired of the wise men. (KJV)

16)    At that time then,  Herod (upon) seeing –beholding that

          he was deluded – deceived – played the fool

          under – by the Magi,

          (he) was provoked into a great wrath – indignation – rage.

          And sending forth [soldiers on his resulting orders],

          he took away in death – he murdered

          All the male children in Bethlehem,

          
         And in all the boundaries – frontiers – limits – region of it,

          from 2 years and downwards,

         according to the Time he diligently and accurately 
         inquired from the proximity of


  [i.e., that Herod posed to a group presented before him

   who were also far enough away to converse in whispers secretly

   among themselves]

        the Magi.

       (AWPR)





17)  Then was fulfilled that which was spoken by Jeremiah the prophet,   

        saying,  (KJV)

      17)      Then at that time was fulfilled – accomplished – completed

                  that definitely uttered / said  

                  under – by – through Jeremiah the prophet

                  saying,

           (AWPR)     




18 In Rama was there a voice heard, lamentation, and weeping, and great mourning, Rachel weeping for her children, and would not be comforted, because they are not.  (KJV)

18)      ‘A voice – A sound

                    Shone forth –toned forth

  [and would echo in the recurring recollections of the minds

    of those who heard it]

                    in Rama was attentively heard – listened carefully to:

                    loud wailing and grievous weeping with tears,

                    and much (tormented – sorrowful) bewailing;

                    Rachel grievously weeping with tears 
                    for the children of her,

                    And certainly not willing / certainly not having the

                    will – desire – purpose

                    to have called to the side of – to be aided or comforted

                    because they certainly were not.’

                    (AWPR)




Comment:  The tomb of Rachel, wife of Jacob, who died in giving birth to Benjamin (cf. Genesis 35:16-19), was and is located in the region that is now the city of modern Bethlehem.  Benjamin was called Ben-Oni “son of I / son of me”, which some have mistranslated as “son of my sorrow”.  However, Jacob affirms it was “son of I / son of me” when he renamed the child as Ben-Yamin “Son at my Right Hand”.  Indeed, Jesus / Yeshua would eventually be known to humanity as “the son at the Right Hand” of GOD the Father Almighty.





19 But when Herod was dead, behold, an angel of the Lord appeareth in a dream to Joseph in Egypt, (KJV)

19)    Then Herod

          having come to his end – having expired / completed / died;

          behold, look and see: an Angel of (the) LORD

          down in a dream gives light – shines – appears

          to Joseph in Egypt,

          (AWPR)      




20 Saying, Arise, and take the young child and his mother, and go into the land of Israel: for they are dead which sought the young child's life.  (KJV)

20)       Speaking with definite words – saying,

             ‘Rising up (from sleep and sluggishness).

              Take up – possess – seize – take along

              the little child and the mother of Him,

              and pass through into (the) Land of Israel:

              for – because those seeking – striving to find

              the soul of / the life of   the little child

              have died (by natural means).’     (AWPR)




21 And he arose, and took the young child and his mother, and came into the land of Israel. (KJV)

21)    Then he [Joseph] rising up,

          took up – seized and took along – snatched up

          the little child and the mother of Him,

          and came forth publicly into (the) Land of Israel.

          (AWPR)




22 But when he heard that Archelaus did reign in Judaea in the room of his father Herod, he was afraid to go thither: notwithstanding, being warned of God in a dream, he turned aside into the parts of Galilee:  (KJV)

22)    Then, hearing attentively and hearkening that Archelaus

          reigns upon Judea  against / in place of – in lieu of /

          in substitution as a successor of 

          Herod the father of him,

          he [Joseph] feared and trembled with fright and terror

          (so as to run away) [rather than]  to go there in that place:

           Then, down in a dream,

           being addressed

           in a very straight-forward business-like

           order - response - warning – oracle,

           he [Joseph]  departed back again into the [sea – waters

           of the] sides – parts – coasts.4

           And behold, look and see;

           The heavens to him were opened,

           And he saw – beheld – observed (it was) the Galilee.

           (AWPR)




23 And he came and dwelt in a city called Nazareth: that it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophets, He shall be called a Nazarene. (KJV)

23)   And having come forth publicly,

          He dwelt in a permanent dwelling / he resided

          Into a city – protected settlement called Nazareth;

          So as to accomplish – make full – complete – fulfill

          That spoken – foretold through the prophet:

                 ‘He shall be summoned forth / called Nazarene.”

          (AWPR)


Disclaimer:  The Alternate Word Pictures with Reiterations (AWPR) translation should be used as a Bible Study Aid only, and it is recommended that a direct literal translation or the King James Bible be used for regular and ecclesiastical purposes, and that the AWPR be used in association only as a Bible study aid so as to help the reader / user in their Bible Studying to clarify context and Scriptural Intent.     Thanks.  -- Brianroy


End-notes: 

1.       The events of the Magi arriving is AFTER the events listed in Luke Chapter 2.  Finding Mary and Jesus the angelically announced Messiah in a manure filled stall, it is not a stretch in any way that the Shepherds (who possibly were raising their flocks primarily  in the valley of Achor, south of Jericho – Isaiah 65:9-10, before proceeding round about to Jerusalem through the south via Bethlehem) could easily have used sheep as payment for someone or the Inn itself to take Miriam and her baby in out of doors.  Judaism often places an emphasis of the relationship of child and mother, and of common decency.  A trade (for example) of 7 fat sheep for eating, and perhaps a lamb without spot or blemish for trade or sacrifice for the Temple would have been more than sufficient payment.  There is absolutely no justification for any relocation of the event to Nazareth or anywhere else.  In fact, the events of both the Shepherds and the visit by the Magi would have preceded the actual day of circumcision of the little child Jesus, meaning the visits by the Shepherds in Luke 2 (written in A.D. 50) and that of the Magi in Matthew 2 (written between June of A.D. 55 and the early fall of A.D. 56 at the latest), both were completed within the first 8 days of Jesus birth.   




2.      The Highway to Israel from Babylonia would have been via:  Accad, Mari, Tadmor, Damascus, Capernaum, Jericho, Jerusalem, and points along that route.




The exit taken by the Magi away from Herod, would likely have been south from Bethlehem to the road that passed from Kadesh Barnea (around the southern part of the Dead Sea traveling East then North through Edom on the King's Highway) to Rabboth-Bene-Ammon, then due east to Dumah, and from Dumah to Babylonia.




3.      “Departed back again”  is the most accurate translation possible for the Koine Greek Word of this verse, which is “anechoresen” – the aorist indicative active of anachoreo.  This means that Joseph, although of the House of David, was a Jew who was previously living in Egypt and for some time had made his home and livelihood there.  Most likely that home was in Alexandria, and the use of the aorist indicative active of anachoreo in the way it is presented in this verse suggests that is where Mary also had spent some time as the wife of Joseph upon her marriage to him.  It also gives cause for a working hypothesis as to part of the reason why Mark took his Gospel to Alexandria after the death of the Apostle Peter on June 29, 57 A.D., and founded what would be the Coptic Church before his own death in the 8th year of Nero in A.D. 62 (just 5 years after that of Peter’s death in Rome).  There must have been some sort of familiarity and testimony that joined Joseph by family and (Mary and the LORD Jesus to that city later, albeit briefly) as a city of refuge away from and out of Herod’s jurisdiction and influence.





4.       Joseph, it seems to me, most clearly took the little child / baby Jesus and the mother of Him out of Egypt by ship back to Israel.  They probably first embarked to Joppa, heard the news of Archelaus, and then took the journey to the next stop of Caesarea (Song of Solomon 2:1) on the coast of Samaria and entered through the plain of Sharon.  Prophecy related to Sharon in the Old Testament informs us that Joseph then would have proceeded by land up to Mount Carmel (Isaiah 35:1-2) before turning aside to Galilee, so as to appear to enter it from an origin in the north and avert suspicion as having actually come from the south. 
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                           


Other Comments I would add  to consider:

Justin, in his Apology, 1.34, says:
"And thou, Bethlehem, the land of Judah" etc.
"Now there is a village in the land of the Jews, 35 stadia from Jerusalem, in which Jesus Christ was born, as you can [still] ascertain also from the registers of the taxing made under Cyrenius, your first procurator in Judea."

From this, we gather:
1) There were still existing meticulously detailed Roman records about a century and a half after their entry.
2) The taxing Bureaucracy were thorough and exacting record keeping pack-rat Administrators; junkies for detailed information and administration.
3) Cyrenius was called the 1st procurator of Judea. 
4) Bethlehem was still existing in the second century A.D., as was known to have existed in Cyrenius' and Jesus' day.
5) The location of this Bethlehem rules out all other nominations for Jesus' birthplace, being 35 stadia from Jerusalem.  But pay attention to Justin, here.

1 stadia was roughly 606 - 630 feet to the Greco Roman.    35 stadia was roughly 4.0 to 4.1 miles  from  Jerusalem's Old City.

Hence, that Bethelehem of Jesus' is in the open fields and winding roads northeast of the current Bethlehem occupied by the Palestinians.  And it is these open fields that archaeologists should excavate. Here is the most likely area they will dig up a stone relic engraved with Bethlehem or some such information in it.


In Luke, we read that EVERY descendant of the House of David converged on Bethlehem! 

While by a modern understanding we might speculate that the number of Davidians at Bethlehem could possibly have been as high as 60,000 to 70,000  after 500 years of repopulating, because of political intrigue and murder of royal lineages,  the more likely answer of the population in Bethlehem at the first census might be one preserved hundreds of years later in the Byzantine period, at which time there was a listing placed on a column that claimed that a number of 20,000 were present at Bethlehem at the time of Christ's birth. While some have claimed this was the number of those 2 and under who were killed at Bethlehem, the historical evidence of the smallness of this lineage, especially of those who were a threat to Herod the Great whose agents were everywhere to arrest even if two men were to stop and talk to one another on a road, one asking another for directions to somewhere and the other daring to answer.   This number of 20,000 listed on a Bethlehem Byzantine Era column would clearly then be the entire number of those of the House of David, and likely we might expect (at best) only as many as a 1,000 to 2,000 babies from birth to the age of two to be present, as the Census number includes only men, and not any women and children that were brought along to be taxed by the Romans.  All these people pressed into the small village of less than a perhaps several hundred, many involved in High Holiday sheep examining (to separate those with blemishes), sheep watching - sheep shearing with wool collection and processing.  What is NOT told you in the Bethlehem narrative is the fact that outside Bethlehem when Jesus was born were fields and fields of many tens of thousands of bleating sheep that were to be used for the daily ritual Temple Sacrifice less than 5 miles away.  

   There are those who contend it was Spring when Jesus was born, but they fail to consider that this would have been so overwhelming at the time of Census that it would have been noted in some way, as over 257,000 sheep at a minimum would be needed to be present for sacrifice at Jerusalem at Passover. According to Josephus, there were Paschal lamb counts of 256,500 lambs for some 2.7 million who went up to Jerusalem in A.D. 70 in the midst of the war with Rome. (Wars of the Jews, 6.9.3.).  Both the sight and smell as well as the thought of the logistics involved for over a quarter of a million sheep moving in or around Passover up to Jerusalem passing by or coming from Bethlehem annually is just an amazing activity that is easily forgotten by a modern world self-absorbed in a full detachment from an agrarian based society.  These 257,000 plus (allowing for a select number to be rejected by the priests before sacrifice)  would be driven up to Jerusalem in regular intervals of flock directing shepherds using a flag / banner waving system and done via  the southern passage from Bethlehem.

  I find it interesting, that since Jesus was born in and among the herds  perhaps in an roofed but open shelter without walls...that this out-of-the-way location at Bethlehem's outskirts, is precisely what allowed Joseph the means to escape Herod's mercenaries.  Visual and audio cover of an animal herd, and a distance of stealth from the actual town during late night hours.

Chapter LI.   Origen, Against Celsus, 1.51  By the time of Origen, the  location was celebrated as a cave at that site, and not the middle of a field...my son is the smell of a fruitful field (says prophecy).   
"Now the Scripture speaks, respecting the place of the Saviour's birth-that the Ruler was to come forth from Bethlehem-in the following manner: "And thou Bethlehem, house of Ephrata, art not the least among the thousands of Judah: for out of thee shall He come forth unto Me who is to be Ruler in Israel; and His goings forth have been of old, from everlasting." Now this prophecy could not suit any one of those who, as Celsus' Jew says, were fanatics and mob-leaders, and who gave out that they had come from heaven, unless it were clearly shown that He had been born in Bethlehem, or, as another might say, had come forth from Bethlehem to be the leader of the people. With respect to the birth of Jesus in Bethlehem, if any one desires, after the prophecy of Micah and after the history recorded in the Gospels by the disciples of Jesus, to have additional evidence from other sources, let him know that, in conformity with the narrative in the Gospel regarding His birth, there is shown at Bethlehem the cave where He was born, and the manger in the cave where He was wrapped in swaddling-clothes. And this sight is greatly talked of in surrounding places, even among the enemies of the faith, it being said that in this cave was born that Jesus who is worshipped and reverenced by the Christians. Moreover, I am of opinion that, before the advent of Christ, the chief priests and scribes of the people, on account of the distinctness and clearness of this prophecy, taught that in Bethlehem the Christ was to be born. And this opinion had prevailed also extensively among the Jews; for which reason it is related that Herod, on inquiring at the chief priests and scribes of the people, heard from them that the Christ was to be born in Bethlehem of Judea, "whence David was." "

David was moved to Bethlehem between 70 and 132 A.D., post Herod, and the Jerusalem white sepulcher was destroyed during this time.  

In Against Marcion 3.13, Tertullian points us to Psalm 72:15,10 in regard to the Magi:

"And there shall be given to him the gold of Arabia" and again: "The kings of Arabia and Saba shall offer to Him gifts."  For the East generally regarded the Magi as Kings; and Damascus was anciently deemed to belong to Arabia, before it was transferred to SyroPhoenicia on the division of the Syrias (by Rome).

...Let those eastern magi wait on the new-born Christ, presenting to Him...the riches of Damascus without a battle, and unarmed.

...Jewish cavillers, in order to disconcert us, boldly PRETEND that Scripture does not hold that a VIRGIN, but only a young woman, is to conceive and bring forth. They are, however, refuted by this consideration, that nothing in the nature of  [an OTH / a Sign] can possibly come out of what is a daily occurence...."

What is being told us?  That at least from the road out of Damascus, the Magi came bearing gold, the spoil of the Jews living in Damascus, to offer gifts from that city to Yeshua.    Herod would have seen this gold, and the other gifts, because it is a spoil enough for a king to start a kingdom.

So now, we have a greater understanding of the political intrigue of Herod...who slaughtered Bethlehem not just because of a prophecy, but for the amount of gold that was being given to a new rival born within it.


The origin of the Magi was probably from Babylonia, in the area or region Hillel, he who brought a fresh Hebrew Copy of the 5 books of Moses that Israel's scribes had (in the Herodian era, at least) heavily abandoned for the Greek translations of the Scriptures would come from.   Hillel revitalized Israel in remembering its Hebrew roots, and the love of the Hebrew Torah.  They were NOT to be like the Gentiles, but a Light to the nations and represent their Hebrew forefathers in their own language passed down to them, not forsaking their inheritance nor their birthright and responsibilities to it.  

In relation to Herod I in 5 B.C., it appears that Herod,  under cloak of law, must have took the position of sharing some of the wealth he accumulated from the massacre at Bethlehem, with some of the Romans overseeing the Census for purposes of taxation, as well as those "anathema" Jewish tax-collectors themselves (who well preceded Matthew).   That is the inference given us in the Mishna's approach to these kinds of Jewish State officials. 
But what about all that gold?  Didn't Joseph get any of it?
 Maybe, but not that much.   We know that Joseph took up Mary and Jesus right quick, and when he came back, he only had pennies enough to buy a poor man's offering after Mary's 33 days had passed (Leviticus 12:4,6-8;  Luke 2:22-24). 

 From October 27 plus 33 days is the end of November.  Yet Joseph did not go up right away to Jerusalem, he hesitated.  In all likelihood, Joseph arrived in Jerusalem when Hannukah overlapped with what day we now call Christmas, in 5 B.C.   It appears to be a Hannukahn style blessing upon Jesus by Simeon and Anna at the Temple (cf. Luke 2:25-39). 

Therefore, unlike the lunar eclipse that was expected in March of 4 B.C., Herod dies either at the end of November or the first days of December under a kind of lunar eclipse that wasn't supposed to happen.  The event of Herod's death is announced in Egypt's coast in a matter of a couple days by ship, likely to Alexandria or it parts where the largest concentration of Hebrews outside Israel would dwell in one place, in time enough for Joseph to return to Jerusalem at Channukah, the festival of lights, and meet Simeon and Anna at the Temple while offering sacrifices having virtually no money at all left from what had previously been offered by the Magi...perhaps spending any and all gold he was originally able to carry away in haste on supply safety for Mary and the baby Messiah, as well as lodging and quick passage (such as swifter boats between Joppa and Alexandria, for example).  

Monday, May 27, 2019

Thoughts Regarding The Population Growth of the Israelites Of The Exodus of 1551 B.C. In Its 215 Year Residency In Egypt From 1766 to 1551 B.C.



On September 14, 2009, at this blog, I posted the ff. fuchsia colored text  material.  I will repost my work product and add the title post new material to that below it. 


In the New Testament, there has been a complaint raised about Jacob coming to Egypt with 75 people, while in the Hebrew Torah, the number listed is 70.

In the New Testament, Acts 7:14 states 75. The LXX states 75 in Exodus 1:5 and previously in Genesis 46:27.

Genesis 46:26 states the number at 66 in the Masoretic text. In verse 27, the number of those coming into Egypt were 70. In Exodus 1:5 of the Masoretic the number is 70. See also Deuteronomy 10:22 in the Hebrew.

That is a jump of 4 in the Hebrew or O (zero) in the Greek. What might be missed is a doubling of the two souls of the sons of Joseph from Genesis 46:26-27, plus their prior count in Genesis 46:20. Were Manassah and Ephraim now counted thrice (3 times)?

The discrepancy between the LXX and the Masoretic, and the Masoretic from itself appears to be a a matter of reckoning. It may be that in the third century BC, and certainly before Herod I came to power when all the LXX was finalized by, the scribes may or may not have altered this number after other information, such as counting children over age two, instead of just those over age three, for example. That LXX information of 75 was entered and finalized well prior to Hillel restoring the lost Hebraic Torah to Israel some 30 years after Herod I came to power. Because the anti-Christian Sanhedrin of Jerusalem sought to catch Christians in every word, it is very unlikely that Stephen, attempting to convince a Sanhedrin Katan wishing to destroy him, would have made the number 75 up. That mistake would have been pounded against Christianity to successfully disperse it if it were so. Hence, we ned to look further, and elsewhere.

When the Hillel Torah was translated in the then modern Hebrew script, it likely did so first using vastly differing letter forms just 400-500 years earlier (several letters even trading with one another), so that number was also entered in the Hebraic Script; but , we just don’t "absolutely" know. But it is possible that the Hillel Copy had 70, because Josephus (who took his reckoning in Antiquities 2.7.4,) reckoned 70 without Jacob, and 71 with him. This disagrees then with the Massorete Exodus 1:5 and Deuteronmy 10:22. What happened?

There is some unaccountability in Torah manuscript transmission. That lacking finds litle solace in being dependant on sparse Mishna to Talmudic quotations, compared to the NT manuscript fragments dating well back to within a couple generations of the disciples themselves, and having a completeness by the age of Jerome, some 50 years prior to the Leningrad Codex.

We do know that in the Second Century, about 250 years before Jerome, a war of words went up when Jewish zealots redacted out this or that word or phrase in order to deny Yeshua, and the Christians chewed them up for it. Perhaps this happened also with the text, using a new counting of souls after thus an age rather than the prior thus an age. If the family of Hebraic manuscripts became small, it made small changes more possible.

Jerome in ca. 392 A.D. probably held copies of the New Testament that were almost exclusively from the first century A.D. sources as well, being only 350 or less years removed from the 47 -57 A.D. compositions of those works (an NT author dating I can reasonably prove).

It is known (Jerome, Against Rufinius, 2.34) that where the Apostolic texts differ from the much later Masoretes in quoting the Hebraic Old Testament texts, the Apostles appear to have followed a manuscript tree that was more closer to Aramaic (if we follow the second century quotations in translation to Latin and Greek by Irenaeus) and first sources, such as the Ezra era translation of Hebrew Scriptures scribed by Hillel -- if I understand correctly -- that was brought to Rome, and cited by Josephus.

Those same copies of that master copy of the Temple, which would have included the Psalms and the prophets like Isaiah and Jeremiah (etc.), made available to all Israel by 6 A.D. to 66/67 A.D. in copy form from that master copy.

Jerome, himself, handled some of these same pre-LXX manuscripts, pre-dating the LXX's completion prior to the ascension of Herod the Great.

By his own testimony, Jerome says that his Hebrew copies that he was handling, were those that pre-dated even our extant Dead Sea Isaiah Scroll now on display in Israel, dating to at least 150 B.C. and possibly as old as 250 B.C.

For him to say this there would have been a clear distinction in the difference of the Hebrew epigraphy. For which aid, he sought out the best Hebrew expert of his day to learn more than just an expanded version of what he would have called "modern Hebrew" in the 4th century A.D....but an "ancient Hebrew" of the 4th to 5th century B.C. as well. The only Ante-Nicene (pre-Nicene) mention of the relevant texts I have found is from about 190-200 A.D., in which Clement repeats the number of 75, citing Genesis 46:27 (Clement of Alexandria, Stromata 1.21) and comparing Euphorus and the 75 nations he mentions (having 72 languages and 3 dialects blending two or three of the 72 together).

So we arrive back at the Massoretes, and find that 134 texts have been tampered with by the Massoretes, who changed the name YHVH into ADNY…4 letters for 4 letters. Therefore, I presume, based on the preponderance of my research that the redaction of the original 75 to 70 was made sometime in the Second Century and retained that way in the Hebrew, and based most likely on whether or not to reckon newborns or one year or two year or three years olds...something along those lines.

I have found no Dead Sea Scroll Texts or anything of an antiquity prior to the ascension of Judah ha-nasi (ca. 190 A.D.) to demonstrate otherwise.


  Thoughts Regarding The Population Growth of the Israelites Of The Exodus of 1551 B.C. In Its 215 Year Residency In Egypt From 1766 to 1551 B.C.

The Exodus of the Hebrews from what we call ancient Egypt is an historic fact in the annals of Time that no denial can ever wipe clean from the annals of human history.  It is an event of great salvation and great faith which is meant to serve as a learning aid to future generations who in our current day have long since forgotten how to read or understand its message. Unlike others who date by hearsay speculation as to the latest fad, I have checked and rechecked the literary accounts and found the actual chronology to be OLDER than what most are told to blindly believe, and often in conflict from the crank or the quack who cannot reasonably argue the point with veracity over and over as I most certainly can, using not only the Bible, but extra-biblical verification left by early Christian writers regarding the Greeks and even Flavius Josephus himself, because when his calendar of reckoning changes to the years of reckoning, I use the same calendar length reckoning he was utilizing by the formulations he left us, which is unlocked by the Bible itself.  

In 1551 B.C., there was an EXODUS of over 2,000,000 men, women, and children (all direct descendants from the sons of Jacob) were born in the Delta lands of Ancient Egypt at a time that they were mostly swamp lands 9which they cultivated, filled in, rimmed with pointed sticks & had gates in and out of to guard against Nile Crocodiles & the like, 
bottoms that sometimes flooded or kept Goshen isolated by watery surroundings more than 6 months of the year, 
these 2,000,000 of the Exodus (not counting the strangers who joined themselves to them) were born to roughly 56 Hebrew male individuals who had children exclusively in ancient Egypt beginning from their entry into the land in 1766B.C., exactly 215 years previously.

From 1766 B.C. to 1551 B.C., the Marriageable ages began as early as 13 for boys and 12 for girls, and this very tradition is preserved down to this day by the Bar Mitzvah and Bat Mitzvah ceremonies. 

 At the time, Joseph their kinsman was vice-ruler of all northern Egypt, which was at this time ruled by the Assyrian ethnicity known as the Hyksos, who had made conquest there for their own survival, after falling repeatedly in battle to the Hittites and essentially being run out of what is now northern Iraq and most of eastern and southern Syria.

For the first 4 generations born in ancient Egypt to the male descendants of Jacob, the average Hebrew family had by average some 4.5 sons every 30 years, 
so that by 1646 B.C., just 120 years after Jacob's family with 56 males fully moved to Egypt in 1766 B.C.,
there were some 22,963 Hebrew males by that 4th generation who were born in the lands of ancient Egypt proper, 
with 5,103 Hebrew males born of the prior generation before that.  

In effect, the calculation presumes 4.5 to 5.5 females on average were also born per family, so that the average Hebrew family during this period was generally 9 to 10 children, perhaps even 12 children in all on average per family was possible, should we deduct for child diseases, accidents, and the like.  
Sometimes fertility enhancements can be found in the muck (as was known in ancient Central America) and/or certain vegetation, scooped up from the river and carried by basket and dump and hoe process applied to crop lands.  Since Goshen started as swamp lands like a reed solidifying delta island still building up when Israelites were first placed there, it is now long since filled up to regular lands on the path of what would likely be now a lost Nile Delta forking on the East regions well before it made its way to the sea.  Geographically we must note that it is nearing a generation shy of just 3600 years ago to where it's original location is essentially lost to us in our day, but general indicators appear to remain somewhat.  

Some 4 years before the end of the 4th generation, in 1650 B.C., a ruler came into power that knew NOT Joseph, and suddenly new taxation with interest for foods were instilled upon the Hebrews and their large families. 

 At this point, opportunistic Hebrews entered into the concept realm of banking for the first time in their history, and Jews who ran the first financial systems would soon use the practice of charge over-bearing interests to then sell their own brethren into slavery under the Hyksos military forces as a means of enriching themselves, the Hebrews paying twice as much as any costs upon tributes to the Hyksos ruler and any that their fellow Hebrew banker princes could ever have been owed, and probably more than even this. 

 For some 19 years, until the birth of Moses in 1631 B.C., the Hebrews went to work as debt slaves, and by skill and great intelligence using wooden block and tackle and fulcrum technology engines and water saw stone cutting devices and others of all sorts, the Hebrews efficiently  built the Hyksos in Egypt great cities for their times, perhaps starting with a labor force of 5,000 plus to grow into a skilled labor force of more than 20,000 in just 19 years.  Seeing just this increase, even the Hyksos seeing the sudden rise and increase in the breeding of the population saw the Hebrew potential to surpass the less than 300,000 Hyksos in numbers with just one generation, and dwarf it and potentially run them out of ancient Egypt in less than 60 years after that if something wasn’t done to dramatically decelerate Hebrew virility.  At this point in 1631 B.C., the originally Assyrian Hyksos had been in Egypt approximately 170 to 175 years.  

In 1631 B.C., the Hebrews were already crying out for deliverance from their debt bondage quite quickly at the outset in the 1640s B.C. and then in the 1630s B.C., but then as now, bankers were and still are greedy self-justifying over-interest charging real deplorables…and for this reason, the admonition such as

Ezekiel 18:13
Hath given forth upon usury, and hath taken increase: shall he then live? he shall not live: he hath done all these abominations; he shall surely die; his blood shall be upon him.  

Ezekiel 22:12 In thee have they taken gifts to shed blood; thou hast taken usury and increase, and thou hast greedily gained of thy neighbours by extortion, and hast forgotten me, saith the Lord God.

finds its origin and history as first in the Exodus,

Exodus 22:25 If thou lend money to any of my people that is poor by thee, thou shalt not be to him as an usurer, neither shalt thou lay upon him usury.

Leviticus 25:36 Take thou no usury of him, or increase: but fear thy God; that thy brother may live with thee.

Leviticus 25:37 Thou shalt not give him thy money upon usury, nor lend him thy victuals for increase.

Deuteronomy 23:19 Thou shalt not lend upon usury to thy brother; usury of money, usury of victuals, usury of any thing that is lent upon usury:

Deuteronomy 23:20 Unto a stranger thou mayest lend upon usury; but unto thy brother thou shalt not lend upon usury: that the Lord thy God may bless thee in all that thou settest thine hand to in the land whither thou goest to possess it.

is over and over is not so much about excessive interest rates being charged as ANY INTEREST RATE BEING CHARGED.  Interest rates, from a biblical perspective, helps the lender who lends within his own people (such as Hebrews to Hebrews) break even and very little else.  Any gain must be considered as negligible if gain is made in lending to those that could afford to pay it back, 



Proverbs 28:8

He that by usury and unjust gain increaseth his substance, he shall gather it for him that will pity the poor.

and to the poor, it was to be a no interest loan.  Would that Christians who lend one to another, or banks within the United States take up that same attitude toward its own, or foreign nations do the same for their own people wheresoever they are.  


So when usury or interest rates on borrowed money is used as a means to profit by and enslave one’s own kinsmen, it is certainly one of the Biblical definitions of SIN that we are ever oppressed by and few ever spend time in Church addressing from the Bible and talking about.


The Psalms are often unlocked when seen through the eyes of those who wrote them as often being mindful and placing it in 3 parallel universe contexts: The Exodus past – the Mystery present – the Future (inclusive of the End of Days).  For example, all three of these themes run through Psalm 23, which includes the crossing into the depths of the Red Sea, the rod of Moses left hand and the staff of his right hand which pointed the way to the blast of the nostrils of GOD, whom parted the sea, as Israel by faith descended down by a slightly steep embankment (Isaiah 63:12-14)  into the valley of the shadow of death on dry land as the sea stood in heaps as though great canyon walls to either side. 



With the massacre of newly born and under age 2 Hebrew males in 1631 B.C., the Hebrew birth rate dropped to 3 males per 30 year generation on average. 

 The fifth generation achieved an approximate 68,889 Hebrew males, 

the sixth generation which ended in 1586 B.C. resulted in 206,667 more Hebrew males, 

and the seventh generation which ended in 1556 B.C. (by this reckoning), possessed some 620,001 Hebrew males in that generation. 

 Five years into the 8th generation, the Hebrew nation experienced their deliverance.  The Exodus from Egypt.  

In the actual chronology of the Bible, affirmed by the kept records of rule, of genealogy, and of extra-biblical historical verification, we come to find that the Hebrews were only in Egypt to dwell and multiply for just 215 years, arriving to dwell 215 years after the Patriarch Abram. 

 If there is any doubt, the genealogy of Moses should remove this.  Levi, the son of Jacob, came down into Egypt out of Canaan with his father Jacob and all the brethren (minus Joseph who with his wife and children already dwelt there).  In ancient Egypt, Levi had a son named Caath, who in turn had a son named Amram, who was the father of Moses.  

Questions:  The genealogy of Moses being a complete one, how old was Amram when he fathered Moses, how old was Caath when he fathered Amram, remembering that Moses was 80 years old when he left Egypt? 
Answer:   There needs only be 135 years separation from the birth of Moses and his great-grandfather Levi fathering Caath in Egypt.  The 215 year sojourn from Jacob to the Exodus of Moses is therefore not just "reasonable", but the only logical answer.  


Exodus 12:40-41
“Now the sojourning of the children of Israel,
  Who dwelt in Egypt, 430 years.
        And it came to pass at the end of 430 years,
  Even the selfsame day [Abraham first entered the land]
  It came to pass,
  That all the hosts of the LORD went out from the land of Egypt.”

This notation qualifier is affirmed both by the Samaritan Septuagint and by the Apostle Paul, who in Galatians 3:16-17 writes:
16 Now to Abraham and his seed were the promises made. He saith not, And to seeds, as of many; but as of one, And to thy seed, which is Christ.
17 And this I say, that the covenant, that was confirmed before of God in Christ, the law, which was four hundred and thirty years after, cannot disannul, that it should make the promise of none effect.

Clearly, the Apostle Paul dates the 430 years as between Abraham receiving a specific in person promise from GOD and the time that the Exodus occurs. 

The promise given by GOD in Genesis chapter 15 was in 1981 B.C.

-- according to actual Bible Chronology, rather than manufactured dates by anti-Bible atheistic agenda  archaeology –
that Abram first entered Egypt in Genesis chapter 12, so that the events of Genesis 12:10 to Genesis 15:18 happen within a time period of perhaps less than 6 to 8 months maximum in the year we reckon as 1981 B.C.
  It has to happen in the same year timeline according to the parameters or restrictions the Bible places upon its own historical narratives.  A Spring entry into Egypt, and perhaps by early summer the events of rescuing the ruler of Sodom and attacking already withdrawing Hittite forces to save him, and by the fall the Messianic Covenant promise from the Almighty Himself.     

Moses grew up from less than the age of 2 as one of the Hyksos, a race known as the shepherd kings.  These people on average attained heights between 6'7' to over 10' tall.  It is uncertain if those giants who settled in the Americas with their Egyptian slaves were from this period in history as well as those of the late 1200s to early 1000s B.C., but the last remnants of those giants of South and North America in very small tribal remnants were eventually killed only about or soon after the Spanish conquests into the Americas, from what I gather.  These may have been skilled in metallurgy to some degree, and their weapons and armor was far superior to those we now call Native Americans (or American Indians) who feared them.  In the Americas, the giants in North America, at least, seemed to be Caucasian and often had red hair and blue eyes in settlements they had both in the West (such as Utah) and in the regions east of the Mississippi but west of the Appalachians (reportedly such as in Tennessee and Kentucky).   

It was in or about 1603, that Moses at age 28, a giant of 8'9" himself, general of the armies of the Hyksos, defeated the armies of the Ethiopians in Memphis, Egypt, and then further south along the Nile.

One of the two most likely locations that the Hebrews crossed, is due east of Suknah Spring through the Gulf of Aqaba (technically the Red Sea), with a distance of about 21.9 miles across.  The distances and geographic terrain appear to be of enough similarity to name this as a more than just only as a possible location.

When the Hyksos king  called Jonias (by Egyptian historian Manetho more than 12 centuries later) died,  the daughter of Jonias, Thermuthis,  was not allowed to succeed him.  Assis, whom likely was the son of the Hyksos chieftain who died at Saba, (apparently having been entrusted to the scared scribes) was placed on the throne, and dwelt at Pithom / Pothim, also known as Baal-Zephon, an as yet undiscovered Hyksos city that appears to have been on the west shoreline of the Gulf of Aqaba north of a low mountain range, part of the year (probably the summer), and also part of the year was spent at Avaris, known to most later as Raamses during most of the rest of the year.  

     There is little doubt that Assis was so named as “the wicked one” by ancient Egyptians with some kind of just cause, even if only we were to view the type of transition from indentured slavery to full unmitigated slavery with no hope for freedom experienced under his reign by the Hebrews who groaned out in great emotional and mental affliction as well as from their exhausting physical labors to work off an ethnic debt that was never-endingly ensured by over-interest charging fellow Jews who profited off the suffering of their brethren, and like the Pharisees 15 centuries later, saw their gentle and rich living as a sign of their own holiness, and the suffering of others as righteous damnation of those not worthy to be princes or nasi, those who saw themselves not just as rulers, but little gods upon the earth in the midst of the human jungle.    
    
    On what appears to be  Rosh Hashana 1552 B.C., GOD spoke to Moses on Mount Horeb, which so far to us, is only known for certain to have been in the northwest border region of Saudi Arabia.  Days later GOD stood in the way of Moses so as to slay him, but was spared by the quick actions of his wife Zipporah who quickly circumcised his son and threw the bloody skin down on the ground and appeased GOD’s anger from slaying her husband for failing to keep the Abramic Covenant that required such circumcision as even Moses himself already had when he was just days old. 


   For whatever reason, after 40 years of not using the dialect, Moses was no longer quick and fluent in the Assyriac Language of the Hyksos, and as instructed by the Almighty, relied on his brother Aaron to be his translator between he and King Assis.  Assis received his audience, recognizing Moses, whose death sentence was only as long as Hyksos law allowed, and was no longer in force because the King who decreed it died 40 years earlier.  Had this not been so, Moses knowing the law as next in line to the throne by adoption, would never have returned to the Hyksos dominions.  And we cannot rule out the possibility that had the Hyksos been so inclined, even though a Hebrew of an entire people now under debt slavery, had the Hyksos wanted, they could have accepted the 8’9” tall Moses who stood in great stature among some (but not all) their tall ones, as one of their own. 

However, for all intentional purposes, the generational multiplication of the 56 males into a nation of over 2,000,000 with over 620,000 military age males between 20-60 is thus as stated above.  Perhaps very minor adjustments might be needed, with the word minuscule as perhaps better used:  but it is otherwise mathematically true to the historical record. 



Speculation regarding finds of Giants and Pyramid Technology in the Americas
 It was perhaps from the reign of Assis, that the first Egyptians were taken captive away under Hyksos mariners and settled Central America.  The Hyksos alone seem to contain the pre-dominant genes of giantism as a race of peoples, and it appears to me that the American natives are de jure descended from those who were original Egyptians & Egyptian captives brought over in the 18Th, 17th, & 16th centuries B.C.  And based on the information of the suppressed knowledge that the Smithsonian Museum has of over 500 Giantism skeletons uncovered in the USA in the past 250 years, more than 1/2 that number varying from 8 to 17 feet tall, and one alleged several feet higher than that in the mid 1800s -- as well as the various civilizations of South America where new diseases from the Europeans appear to have struck many perhaps dozens that remained in the 1500s and wiped them out there -- certain tribal belief systems & myths & actual Egyptian artifacts of the Grand Canyon tomb (at a time that the Grand Canyon, by hypothesis,  likely still had water & was seemingly largely & at least 1/3 of its depth or higher contained as a lake to as late as pre-1200 B.C. perhaps), only make sense when connected to this very same time period as the Hyksos ruling the Nile Delta regions of Egypt.  

The tribes of the ancient Egyptians multiplying in the ancient world still under Arctic freeze that glacier covered most of North America down to the Caribbean.  From the late 1500s B.C. to perhaps the late 900s B.C., various breakaway colonies in the Americas from what is now Mexico to the southern Andes, had Rephaim giants who led and sometimes lorded over them, and had trade with Egyptian influenced and in the know Mediterranean mariners, mostly those directly affiliated with the various Rephaim giants who still kept contacts with the Atlantis of old, the primary port and kingdom the New World Rephaim used as their port and base of operations until perhaps a volcanic and earthquake destruction of which like the island of Santorini or Krakatoa, it blew apart in violence, and in effect fell into the sea, even if based on the mainland proper along an Eastern Coastline at a yet to be determined Caribbean location.