Are this nation's seniors prepared to be denied Healthcare starting October 11, 2011 per Obama Deathcare?

Starting on October 11, 2011 (reading pp. 441-462 of HR 3962) anyone on Medicare Parts A &  B, needing to go to a hospital for services, once released from a hospital, will not be readmitted in most cases, because they will not be paid for.

If the patient is hospitalized over 90 days, there will be no more payments to the care facility, and the patient cannot be readmitted to another Hospital for the same problem.

That means Congress has legally granted forced expulsions of coma and other intensive care patients to die.

So where can these expelled off the very hospital gurney expelled patients go?

That's begins on page 1361 with Section 2512, where those kicked out or unable to see a doctor via the coming doctor shortages will be "referred" into Nurse Managed Health Centers.

 In other words, the hospital can stick a "referral" card in your nightgown shirt, dump you at a bus stop at the next corner from the hospital, and if you die of pneumonia while passed out on the bus stop bench, "oh well". 

So just where are all these newly created or existing "Nurse Managed Health Centers" exactly?  As of September 2010, there were just 250 of these facilities, giving some 2.5 million treatments.
 http://journals.lww.com/ajnonline/Fulltext/2010/09000/Nurse_Managed_Health_Centers.17.aspx

They are not set up for managed care, and the average turn around is about 5 times a year for these patients.  So in other words, 250 facilities realistically treat some 500,000 patients (some chronically more than others) at a rate of about 20,000 people per yer per facility.  Uh, the US Population exceeds 320,000,000.  And if we ADD 100,000,000 to a pre-requisite of Nurse Managed Health Care (NMHC) centers to treat...even if you double the case-load, or increase it by 10 times the September 2010 number, that leaves either 99, 500,000 or 95,500,000 new patients left to fend for themselves. 

So who is going to take care of the many tens of thousands of expelled terminal or the hundreds of thousands of unable to pay hospital patients?  The scam has already been SEIU planned for by those of the SEIU who wrote the illegal Law. 

(Is Obama a Natural Born Citizen born of 2 United States parents on US Soil?  Absolutely not.  His father was a Kenyan National, and Obama can't even produce a US Birth Certificate, nor is one even on file to isssue him as to being born in Hawaii and who the attending physicians were, what Barack's birth weight was, or anything not already on the short form forgery a paid administrative groupie in his 2008 campaign generated on a California computer...not even being a forgery done in Hawaii.  Hence, Obama by being illegal signed not only a voidable law, but runs a voidable Presidency.)

The Healthcare-Deathcare SEIU emplaced provisons within the bill (now illegally law) that were INTENTIONALLY meant to be another scam on the Government, a redistribution of wealth, in which the SEIU runs a minority preference government paid payroll from the $75 per person extortion, employing several millions as part of the New Government Socialism, of whom some 100,000 will be administrators of some sort.  The budget breaks down to a self-sustaining income of 22.5 billion dollars a MONTH for the first year of payroll, if everybody pays. An extortion of $270,000,000,000 from Americans, whether they pay themselves, or someone else is arm-twisted to pay for them or face $50,000 fines with felony imprisonment for each offense.

And what of the newly created labor pool of unskilled and uncaring workers looking merely for their paycheck, and simply meeting a quota to stay on the Obama payroll?   That is, in Obama Health-Death-care, the vast majority of those who become a managed Heath Care person (and who would be lucky to do more than pass a food handler's class), will be placed on a Federal Government payroll to take a temperature, record the blood pressure, and perhaps scold the patients to eat jello and drink black tea and think they are equal to actual physicians in the services they will worthlessly perform.   They will be overseen by either practical nurses, or at best interns in the roles of administrators, giving America third-world care, and with the expectant third-world mortality results to soon follow.  You may also expect that these unpractical nurses (not even rising to the ability of a practical nurse, let alone a registered nurse)  will offer Government approved talking points or counseling as to "why choose suicide" for those who are chronically ill, or have reached the age of Social Security (in their mid to late 60s and above) and by committing suicide, following the then DNC / SEIU and Obama Administration talking points, "when you spread the wealth around, it's good for everybody" (in the words of Barack Hussein Obama).

Who will the newly created millions of Managed Healthcare workers, just like the Nurses, be required to be a member of?  The Service Employees International Union (the SEIU).  Can the Nurse prescribe medicine, treat serious cases? No.

On page 1247 the definition and scope of nursing does not change. She can put a band-aid on you, take your pulse or blood pressure, tell you to change your diet, give you a condom, pat you on the head and order you out the door.

And don't forget, in HR 3962, page 187 following, it is now a fact of the illegal Healthcare Law that it says, that if you don't pay into your own required health plan, (now known to be at a rate of $75 per man - woman -child PER MONTH, you will be anti-Constitutionally (since it is neither necessary nor proper) extorted to pay the Commissioner or Health Exchange directly.  That's 22.5 billion dolars per month x 12 for a 270 billion dollars a year for corrupt politicians and unions to overpay their salaries with, get dividends from, and say they "earned"...and screw the American people who they would be stealing it from...to these corrupt parasites and termites to the Tree of Liberty, it's to be relabeled as their "fair share" and Communist-Socialist corrupt "wealth redistribution" scheme. 

So how will this affect the Presidential elections of 2012, IF we still have the option to vote for and elect a President, if Obama doen't declare himself President for life or Dictator with his willing co-Conspirators already at all levels and departments of Federal Government?  Let this be one answer.

We should make a 2012 poster reading
 "2012"
across the top,
"666"
across the bottom,
and put Barack Obama's picture in the middle. 

Even though he is not THE Antichrist,
he is clearly "a" AntiChrist.
Let us be clear on who exactly is Satan's emissary: Barack Hussein Obama.


666  
(Those of the world, not protected by Jesus, are worshiping and covering for Obama, and this is in preparation for them to worship Anti-Christ.)

 

 
  In regard to the video: 


Revelation 13:18   Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.


Revelation 19:20   And the beast was taken, and with him the false prophet that wrought miracles before him, with which he deceived them that had received the mark of the beast, and them that worshipped his image. These both were cast alive into a lake of fire burning with brimstone.


------------------------------------------
Earlier today, Rush Limbaugh mentioned this odd story on his radio program...but it fits the theme.  The NY Times prays for Obama to be lucky?

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/30/opinion/30friedman.html?_r=1

While Tom Friedman prays in the New York Times:  “Dear Lord, please make President Obama lucky”;
we should remember that “lucky” in the ancient Greek is directly translated as "to have a good demon”.  

So in effect, Friedman and the New York Times are essentially and  subconsciously saying,
“… please make Obama a good demon."   Way to go, New York Times.

So this 666 notion isn't really a stretch at all.  But let's get back to the Healthcare argued in another op-ed in the Left or West Coast of the USA, in a Los Angeles Times piece early last month.
 
In February 2011, Liberal Constitutional scholar Akhil Reed Amar, the former law clerk of Supreme Court Justice Stephen Breyer (when Breyer was judge on the First Circuit Court of Appeals), displayed an idiocy on the US Constitutional Law to such a height, that his then Los Angeles Times op-ed piece ought to be cited as reason to exclude him from any judicial nomination, even if it were Justice of the Peace over the squirrels in a State or Federal Park... to me, his faulty rationale regarding Healthcare is that atrocious and nutty so as to be a clear dis qualifier.

http://articles.latimes.com/2011/feb/06/opinion/la-oe-amar-health-care-legal-20110206
http://www.cato-unbound.org/contributors/akhil-reed-amar/
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Akhil-Reed-Amar/106083422755797

In his February 6, 2011, Los Angeles Times Editorial, "Constitutional Showdown", Amar is clearly disingenuous when he claims to be "apolitical." For a Leftist ideologue who is equated with other Liberal Constitutionalists (who just happen to be ACLU National Board Members like Duke University's William Van Alstyne or Harvard's Alan Dershowitz) in the same breath, this must be a laugh out loud sort of a joke.

Amar focuses his argument that Obama [Forced-Pay Communism as] Healthcare is "Constitutional” based on its inter-state Commerce Clause application. How about the intrastate application? Or do intrastate Healthcare or State rights simply cease to exist because “Amar has spoken”? 
If a Healthcare Company operates exclusively in a single state as an insurer to a hospital group operating exclusively in the same state, where is the Commerce Clause applicable to the regulating?

The view and overall argument that Amar pushes by his op-ed, when you know and read what the powers of “Obama-care” are claimed to be

 {if printed the ff. linked chart will be 10 feet wide and 5 feet high!}
http://www.healthtransformation.net/galleries/wallcharts/HHS_V7%20(Final).pdf

appears to advance the general concept in logical regression is that once the Federal Government in “Obama-care” can over-reach authority and give themselves 1,968 new powers, that they can also eventually claim the same authority to regulate food and deny food as they would over the counter medications or bandages. And if bandages, they can claim to deny you cotton clothing because bandages are primarily cotton. In effect, it goes to more than just regulating prescription medicine, but unconstitutionally reaches its authority to areas where it should not and cannot legally go.

But Amar goes further, he states in his LA Times article that: "There is nothing improper in the means Obamacares deploys. Laws may properly regulate actions and inactions....Breathing is an action...."

In effect, that is in context to the vacuity of the argument Amar makes...through Obamacare, the Government can regulate who can breathe or who is no longer permitted to breathe, and snuff you out. This is the dangerous rhetoric, not just the idiocy of what Amar argues.

"There is nothing improper in the means Obamacares deploys. Laws may properly regulate actions and inactions....Breathing is an action...." Amar argues. 



Amar has just justified US Concentration Camps as Constitutional, and that anyone Obama deems as undesirable may be liquidated.  Why?  If the Government can regulate the action of breathing, it can regulate who can and can no longer legally breathe.  It can then kill off those individuals, and spread their worldly goods or wealth around, and the murderers who sanction and partake in the spoils of America's planned genocide see such a course of action as a moral good.  That is what evil does to the minds of the Left, no matter what evil they do, they will find a way to justify their evil deeds as "good". 
You may also wish to read how Amar equates the 22 states who did not join the 28 State majority attaching itself to suing Obama Health-Death-Care as unconstitutional, Amar equates 22 as if they equaled a 3/4ths majority to have made Healthcare an amendment like the 1913 income tax.  So...Amar, the Constitutional Scholar that he is, teaches there are 112 States to the United States?  That's the only way that 28 opposed becones 25% and the necessary 75 % of the states approving Obama-Health-Death-Care gets passed by Amendment to the US Constitution...if there were 84 states v. the 28 against.  Amar currently teaches at Yale University.  How the leaves of the ivory have fallen.


-----------------------------------------

No matter...the world system loves its own. 

But those who are in Christ Jesus, and truly His; by their fruits shall you know them.

True born-again Christians do NOT follow the voice of the stranger, or of those whose Deity is Fraudulent and does secret evil as well as openly robs with violence, as does Obama by how he governs in the Presidency he has usurped.

An expanded with word pictures and reiterations of John 10:1-9, as translated from the Greek New Testament manuscript:

"Amen, Amen, I say unto you.  He not coming-entering-going through the door/gate into the courtyard gathering area (or pen) of the sheep, but in contrast, ascends up and over (and in) by another way, ascending up and over from elsewhere,  that one is a thief, one who steals secretly and/or by fraud, and a robber, one who steals openly and oft with violence takes.
He then coming and going through the door/gate is the Shepherd of the Sheep.  To this one, the watcher of the gate, the keeper/guard at the door/gate, opens.  And the sheep, the sound/tone/voice of him hears; and the privately owned sheep (of him) he extracts and removes, driving out.  In front and before them he passes and transports away, and the sheep of him together follow in the way because they know the sound/tone/voice of him. 


A some other, a stranger, then, in no way should they accompany or follow in the way; but will escape and flee from him, because they certainly do not see/perceive/know that stranger's voice. 


...Amen, Amen, I say unto you.  That I AM, the door/gate of the sheep. 
..I AM the door/gate, through Me, if anyone come-entering-and-going, he will be saved....
The thief comes not, but for to steal, to sacrifice-slaughter-slay-kill, and to destroy...."

In the King James:


John 10



1 Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that entereth not by the door into the sheepfold, but climbeth up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber.
2 But he that entereth in by the door is the shepherd of the sheep.
3 To him the porter openeth; and the sheep hear his voice: and he calleth his own sheep by name, and leadeth them out.
4 And when he putteth forth his own sheep, he goeth before them, and the sheep follow him: for they know his voice.


5 And a stranger will they not follow, but will flee from him: for they know not the voice of strangers.

7 Then said Jesus unto them again, Verily, verily, I say unto you, I am the door of the sheep.
8 All that ever came before me are thieves and robbers: but the sheep did not hear them.


9 I am the door: by me if any man enter in, he shall be saved, and shall go in and out, and find pasture.


10 The thief cometh not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy:
I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.

11 I am the good shepherd: the good shepherd giveth his life for the sheep.
14 I am the good shepherd, and know my sheep, and am known of mine.

27 My sheep hear my voice, and I know them, and they follow me:


28 And I give unto them eternal life; and they shall never perish, neither shall any man pluck them out of my hand.

29 My Father, which gave them me, is greater than all; and no man is able to pluck them out of my Father's hand.

30 I and my Father are one.


True believers in Jesus Christ do NOT follow a deity whose goal is "trick / deceive", or to steal, slay (as if making a sacrifice of the brutality), or to destroy. That is Allah (aka. Lucifer / Satan / the Devil), the deity of the Muslims and of Barack Hussein Obama. We who are truly in Christ Jesus are Rock Solid in Christ, who in contrast, comes to give Life, and to give it more abundantly. Which by the way, is a very good reason to oppose a Health care legislation which is actually one that promotes Death by both characteristics of thievery and robbing...as well as that of slaying or sacrificing the elderly and sick, on impulse of greed for whatever wealth they might gain by their deaths.

Find the eternal Rock of safety and security, and hide your soul in Christ.  Make your eternal salvation, through faith in Christ Jesus, and what He did at the Cross (Romans 10:9-10,13) "rock solid", and in the hands of G-D (John 10:28-29).


Rock Solid


Previous Healthcare related Articles:

http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2009/10/healthcare-bill-3200-and-others-rooted.html

http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2009/11/hr-3962.html

http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2010/11/krugman-advocates-death-panel-massacres.html

http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2009/12/feinstein-claims-unlimited-life-and.html

http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2010/01/reality-tv-with-obama-this-installment.html

http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2010/11/dr-janda-and-new-healthcare-situation.html

http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2010/03/pass-healthcare-by-illegality-and-we_30.html

http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2010/03/new-zeal-on-communist-socialist-obama.html

America subverted by a Foreign Data Collection Agency? 666, the Beast, and Barack Obama.

It all began with reading a San Francisco complaint about Vitalchek while researching another issue:
http://www.yelp.com/biz/vitalchek-san-francisco#query:marriage%20certificate


• 2/18/2011


Vitalcheck has relationships with multiple state registrar offices across the country to provide "faster service" when requesting documents like birth certificates, etc. I paid $86 to have two certified copies of my birth certificate expedited and their website implied it would take "3-4 business days". Five business days later, no certificates which I need for a passport for travel soon. I called the company and now they say that the state office estimates 10 business days. Vitalchek now says that they've done their part by sending the order to the state office, but they can't call and see what's holding things up, they can't give me the number of the state office to call myself and there's no tracking information at this point. They also won't refund my money because they did their part which was to send my request to the state for me.

I've lost a week already and no one at VitalChek can do a thing to help.


I found out that you can go to your birth county's registrar of deeds and get it for very cheap. My father was allowed to go and get a certified copy by walking in and overnight it to me.


Save your money and be aware that the "estimated" times that VitalChek gives you is just that. Don't depend on them if you really need the documents fast.


So who is this Vitalchek,
a subsidiary of Lexis-Nexis,
 which is a subsidiary of Choicepoint,
which since 2008 is a subsidiary of Reed Elsevier
 based in both London and Amsterdam?

 You know Amsterdam, it is the place where they have more than an entire city block mega computer affectionately named "666" and "the Beast", because the bar-codes on every item we buy is based on a binary 600, 060, 006 number or 666.  

This reminds us of Revelation Chapter 13 in the New Testament of the Holy Bible:

16  And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:


17 And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.

18 Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.   [or, 666].


Amongst those of the Community, Reed Elsevier is the guardian of "big brother" (the mega- mega-computer) as it regards to running background info in use from the obvious law enforcement to the clandestine NSA and foreign CIA, is it not? It is. Every person in the world that has any data, from their club membership cards and purchases, to every stroke we type on the Internet, to employment and financial records, to Facebook pictures, to what have you, is crunched into data collection centers and processed to "666" and then regurgitated back through Lexis-Nexis et al. in censored form.

If you wish to stranglehold and blackmail Congress or anyone in the US Government, it is accomplished first and foremost through Reed Elsevier from either Amsterdam or London, and Reed Elsevier also has a direct membership and tie in with the Council of Foreign Relations and Henry ("I vant to make Obama the vorld dictator") Kissinger's Bilderburgers. As the axiom goes: "knowledge / data is power".

At http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ChoicePoint
 pulled up on March 26, 2011, we learn that:

ChoicePoint was used to perform consumer and criminal background checks on prospective employees of the Obama administration.[4]

4. ^CNN Obama Questionnaire, 13 November 2008, loaded 13 November 2008


In other words, it is in the interest of Big Brother and its subsidiaries not to be shown up on the Obama background investigation and other gaffes: information that can be both controlled and altered/manipulated from foreign countries...the United Kingdom and the Netherlands.

In 2005 Choicepoint was already rocked by a scandal of a data loss of 145,000 identities. 35,000 in California and 110,000 elsewhere in the US.

We know this above data loss as reported from Choicepoint itself, as well as through CNN Money and the ACLU.

http://www.privacyrights.org/ar/CPResponse.htm
http://money.cnn.com/2005/02/17/technology/personaltech/choicepoint/
http://www.aclu.org/technology-and-liberty/faq-choicepoint

So what is America missing, other than in most of the Federal Government and in many US States, a foreign firm is gradually controlling the dissemination of information, while gathering anything and everything about each US individual electronically possible to gather?

One major concern is that this group will be the primary controllers of all US Healthcare information and soon coming US National Identity cards, on top of all the aggregate information they already collect or process.  The whole goal of the Obamacare Healthcare is to empower SEIU over almost one-sixth of the US Economy, and to install zealots who would unquestioningly become those who would unquestioningly purge and eliminate the political enemies of Obama by process.  Obama said he spent his whole life with the agenda of SEIU



and it is those of the SEIU that pre-authored the very same atrocious unconstitutional Healthcare forced-pay or else program that will force a minimum payment of $75 a month from every man, woman, and child in America, while stripping services, and making nurses the primary health dispensers of medical care in the US (except to the privileged).  And if a nurse can't help you, according to the unconstitutional alleged Healthcare Law, even though you will die without doctor and medicine that can only be given by a doctor, the newly empowered SEIU will then ship you home from the hospital and you go home to die.  And how will they discern who gets and who gets denied medical treatment based on political identity, and cost ratio to the overall system, as to whether or not it is profitable to keep you alive?  You guessed it, it will be through the data collection of the subsidiaries of Reed Elsevier, and what's compiled on you in the Beast, or 666 - the massive mega mega world population data collection computer.  So we see, the Healthcare takeover is designed to go hand in glove between the SEIU and Reed Elsevier, a foreign controlled entity out of Europe.

The same entity that controls subsidiary Lexis-Nexis, and controls what information about Obama can or cannot be released, as Orly Taitz found out.  Lexis-Nexis was the means by which Orly found Barack attended Columbia University of New York City from only September of 1982 to May of 1983.  Just two semesters, that's it.  That's a hell of a lot of affirmative action do-nothing handouts of extra-cirricular units to go from an Associate Degree to a Bachelor's.
(I reported this in my previous post: http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/03/trump-continues-to-ask-about-obamas.html  )

Of another note, or question: 
Is this new war in Libya, an unconstitutional war started without imminent threat to US personnel or citizens, without imminent threat of terrorist assault, without retaliation for anything other than breathing and resisting the Obama demand that they let the Muslim Brotherhood and Al Qaeda take over?

Is this War really meant simply as a payback against Khadaffi, who openly states that these are Al Qaeda rebel forces, to also hide the fact of an incompetence of not only Obama's background checks, but that Obama is letting in Al Qaida sympathetic Muslim Brotherhood members throughout the Executive branch? It is my unconfirmed belief that this number now exceeds 600, with 200 in the West Wing, and 400 elsewhere (including the bowels of the Pentagon, the CIA, the NSA, etc.) all in the name of political correctness and sensitivity.

And in the meantime, we now war in behalf of a one-third or more Al Qaeda rebel force in Libya to overthrow Khadaffi because why? Because Khadaffi call Barack Obama a fellow Muslim and a son of Africa?

In September 2009
http://articles.latimes.com/2009/sep/24/world/fg-kadafi-un24

Obama was referred to as a son of Africa, and a fellow muslim by Khadaffi.



In February-March 2011




Khadaffi calls Obama "my son" and again refers to him as African. 

"I have said to you before that even if Libya and the United States enter into war, God forbid, you will always remain my son, and I have all the love for you as a son, and I do not want your image to change with me," 

 "We are confronting Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, nothing more. What would you do if you found them controlling American cities with the power of weapons? Tell me,  how would you behave, so that I could follow your example?"


And with that, came the reply. 

Obama bombed the sh*t out of Khadaffi with approximately 120 Tomahawk Cruise Missiles



like he would do to the American cities and  its US Citizens in behalf of Al Qaeda, if he could get away with it.

Trump continues to ask about Obama's missing Birth Certificate, while Orly Taitz finds out Obama attended Columbia University (NYC) only 2 semesters

[Last updated on March 26, 2011

After reviewing and researching off this post of mine, please also review the valuable  ff. Atlas Shrugs link as well:

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/03/your-papers-please.html    

Thanks.

 -- Brianroy]





Donald Trump needs to ratchet up the Birther Issue to a whole new level,
 and can start by reintroducing 3 points on the Birth Certificacte Issue. 


1.  Obama's forged / out of sequence Birth Certification Numbers.

Question the existing short form Certification of Live Birth.
World Net Daily broke that story:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=105347

The Nordykes birth at Kapi-olani were given 151 – 61 – 10637 and 151 - 61 - 10638 both being born on August 05, 1961.  Obama, alleging to be born prior to these twins, has his number as ending as 10641 on August 04, 1961.   However, you will note that there is also an additional two digits, a 19 or four digit middle sequence,
 151 – 1961 – 10641
when the genuine certifications of live birth have only two digits such as "61". 

Another anomaly is to call Barack's father as African rather than negro or even black.  There are a variety of skin colors and racial ethnicities from Africa.  Whites and Blacks in South Africa, Browns in Libya, etc.  Africa is a continent, and does not designate a race as negro, such as "African-American" prior to the Presidency of Ronald Reagan (1981-1989).   To call a race as "African" as Obama's father is so designated, demonstrates that there was NO Long or Short Certification of Live birth for Obama. 


Looks like a forger messed up.  But that has been well known well before the 2008 election for anyone truly interested in discerning veracity from fraud and deception. 

Of the Short Form Birth Certificate Fraud, extraordinary posts by Pamela Geller at Atlasshrugs:

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2008/07/atlas-exclusive.html

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/obamas_birth_certifcate_forgery/

Of there being no Obama Hawaii or US Certification of Live Birth (or Birth Certificate), exactly as a senior 2008 Elections Clerk alleged and Governor Abercrombie found out, I defer to these two January 2011 posts of mine:
http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/01/obama-has-no-birth-certificate-on-file.html
http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/01/obama-confession-and-more-on-non-extant.html

It should be very simple to obtain a Long Form BC, as another blogger has already demonstrated and posted copies of, from September 10, 2010.
http://nobarack08.wordpress.com/2010/10/25/nail-in-the-colb-coffin/




2.  On Point:  2004 Kenyan Media and 2010 official Kenyan Government transcripts

The Nairobi Kenya Eastern Standard is the source of the Birther Movement, substantiated by other African Media and Kenya’s own Government Officials in Public Statement of fact in Transcript.

Of primary concern is the Nairobi Kenya "Eastern Standard" dated as Sunday, June 27, 2004.

That's two and a half years before Barack decided to run (announcing his decision to run in February 2007).
Its headline reads:

Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate

The first line reads:
Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.

De facto, in 2004 the Nairobi of Kenya "Eastern Standard" news media states clearly in the headline that Senator Barack Obama is Kenyan born...hence, born in Kenya. http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm


There are no other living witnesses besides Barack's step-grandmother, who says she saw him birthed in Kenya.
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=107524
and that claim was vetted twice by Kenya's Parliament, one of which was only March of LAST YEAR!!!:

NATIONAL ASSEMBLY
OFFICIAL REPORT
Thursday, 25th March, 2010
The House met at 2.30 p.m.
p. 31 ...2nd paragraph (Mr. Orengo, Ministrer of  Lands of the nation of Kenya, speaking):
"...how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the President of America? It is because they did away with exclusion."


http://www.scribd.com/doc/29758466/RDRAFT25


In others words, NON-Natural born Citizens of the US can now be President of the USA, starting with Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Even National Public Radio, NPR, concurred with the Government and Media of Kenya that Barack was "Kenyan born" UNTIL they scrubbed their web-site in the second week of April of 2010!
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=140993




3. On point of Law:  Obama is required to produce proof

"The burden of establishing a delegation of power to the United States,


or the prohibition of power to the States,


is upon those making the claim."

Bute v. Illinois, 333 US 640 (1948) @ 653
[i.e., the burden of proof is upon those being President to prove they are Natural Born Citizens and Constitutionally eligible.]


“The mother's relation is verifiable from the birth itself and is documented by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses to the birth.” @54

" In the case of the mother, the relation is verifiable from the birth itself. The mother's status is documented in most instances by the birth certificate or hospital records and the witnesses who attest to her having given birth.” @ 62

Nguyen v. INS, 533 US 53 (2001) @ 54,62

Without a US Citizen Father at time of birth, without a voting US Citizen mother, without sole legience to the United States at birth, Barack cannot legally be a US Natural Born Citizen rising to the parameter set by the US Constitution in Article 2.1.5, the 14th Amendment section 1, and the 19th Amendment...not to mention statuatory laws, etc.
http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2011/02/obligatory-literal-definition-of.html


The US Supreme Court ruled he has to prove he has WITNESSES TO THE BIRTH to establish identity. If he wishes to be President or Vice-President, under the pretext of bearing the burden to establish his identity, Barack Hussein Obama II has NO right to privacy in regard to establishing birth hospital, birth street address, and the witnesses to the birth, etc.


Related issue:
 Obama Passport Theft from inside the US Dept. of State during 2008 Democrat Presidential Primaries and that of his active Social Security Number Identity Theft
Of a related issue, Trump should also nail Obama on the very appearance of a quid pro quo to John Brennan Obama Passport theft from the US Department of State
http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2010/10/greta-van-susteren-and-others-in-media.html
by demanding a Congressional Investigation into espionage theft by Brennan's company of the Obama passports and a quid pro quo reward, and demand to know what was so essential about them that they had to be stolen?

This, as well as the stolen SS# that Obama has used, issued from the State of Connecticut on or about March 21, 1977 to someone born in 1890, which Obama has actively used for most of his entire adult life. While Attorney Orly Taitz maintains her belief that the SS# was stolen by
Obama’s grandmother Madeline Payne Dunham [whom] was known to volunteer at the Oahu Circuit court probate department and had access to Social Security numbers of the recently deceased individuals, whose death may or may not have been reported to the Social Security administration.
I maintain the belief and working theory that Barack personally stole a physical Connecticut issued Social Security Card from Arcadia Retirement Center in Honolulu,
http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2010/10/greta-van-susteren-and-others-in-media.html
where he spent some of his work permitted time as allotted by Punahou High School, to serve as someone who mopped up floors and resented it so much, it seems to me, that he allegedly robbed these seniors of that by which he bought his drugs to get high with, as he confessed in his own auto biography "Dreams from My Father". 


----------------------------------------

My Generation needs to remember all the ordure we have been through these last 40 years following the alleged awakening from the 1960s, and to wake up and demand of Obama: 

Who are you?  -- and if need be, in the crass, Who the f**k are you?

Below video contains some very brief profanity to the above effect.



And pay attention to the lyrics of this next song, never mind the detraction of the images.



I also wish to commend Dr. Orly Taitz
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/?attachment_id=20020

because she has been able to at least now pull up Obama's alleged dates of Columbia attendance:

09/01/1982 to 05/31/1983
Bachelor's Degree for Political Science, awarded 05/17/1983


May 1983

S M Tu W Th F S

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

8 9 10 11 12 13 14

15 16 17 18 19 20 21

22 23 24 25 26 27 28

29 30 31

The link jpg is at the link above. It cost her $10.

Lexis-Nexis (a data aggregate company, foreign owned, used and recommended as a US and State Governments data brokerage) was the means by which Orly found Barack attended Columbia University of New York City from only September of 1982 to May of 1983.

Much to the dismay of the fanatical fans and supporters who worship/praise Obama as if he were deified on Earth to them, I was correct in asserting that Barack Obama did NOT attend Columbia in the spring of 1982.

On September 03, 2010
I previously posted to this effect below:

http://brianroysinput.blogspot.com/2010/09/obamas-missing-time-at-columbia-look-to.html


Some, like Pastor Manning, say Obama NEVER attended Columbia University. The greatest missing time-line, when examined, appears to be the Spring Semester of 1982, when there is NO DATA that Barack was even in the city consistently, let alone even attended a single class. But as we shall see, I think it may have been equally logical to say it was because he was battling getting off of drugs, as to speculate anything else in the absence of eyewitnesses and college transcripts.


I think a big problem with the Columbia years, that although Foxnews interviewed some 400 people that attended Columbia at the same time without a single recollection of the man, all we have is the blogger testimony by one singular guy named Phil whom Foxnews did NOT find and interview...but came out himself, and stated


http://www.college.columbia.edu/cct/jan_feb09/alumni_corner

that Obama had Campus access, hence a Columbia University Campus pass, and showered there...but little else. Incredulously, all he needs then, is a Gym Class for the Fall semester of 1981.


"We attended rallies on campus where we were urged to “draft beer, not people,” and discussed ..."


"The crowd we hung out with included ..."


"Barack listened ...and he was ..."


"We both transferred from Oxy to Columbia in fall 1981. "


"Barack has said that he spent a lot of time in the library while at Columbia ..."


"We also didn’t have regular hot water and sometimes used the Columbia gym for showers."


"One weekend I invited Barack to meet ..."


"After that first semester, we had to move. Barack tried to find an apartment for both of us, but was only able to find a studio for himself."


"Through different living arrangements in Astoria, Queens; Bay Ridge, Brooklyn; and all over Manhattan, we stayed in touch..."


"...in 1985,...He left for Chicago..."


"Barack wasn’t thinking about becoming President when he was in college; he wanted to be a writer. "


I would like to ask those that say Barack was a full time student at Columbia, by what proof? The roommate said Barack attended rallies on Campus, and took showers there, and that's it. No talks about the Student Union, or interactions with Campus anything (including students and others) there except at "rallies". The roommate says that Barack said he was at the Columbia Library a lot. He means, that he never had to use the Library himself much if at all, and never once saw Barack at the Library to know for himself? In some classes I took in College, I was often withdrawing and returning upwards of some 6-8 books a week at 21 units in the semester. I find Barack's roomate and attitude that ends up to the effect that it was if he NEVER saw Barack in the Library he claimed to be at, as incredulous. I repeat, Barack's alleged Columbia University and closest Fall Semester 1981 witness is claiming that he never saw Obama on Campus other than at political rallies they attended together or when they took showers in the Campus Gym together. Is he kidding me?


We need to be focusing on precisely what Obama's roommate says, and DOES NOT specifically say about Campus Life in order to best reconstruct the testimony he claims to have and give about Barack's Campus Life and actual College attendance. But for Phil, where would that be? At "Oxy" where he saw Obama living out an actual campus dorm room.


In the article / blog at the NY Times


http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/01/20/recollections-of-obamas-ex-roommate/

he does say that at Occidental, he and Barack had Dorm rooms directly opposite one another...so at least at "Oxy", there is the presumption of mutual full time status and Campus Class attendance. But getting back to Phil's first-hand blog:


It seems to me that he phrases Obama in the careful language of laying smoke, while de facto stating that Obama was more or less a Columbia University outsider for that semester, or perhaps (by the impression) one not even carrying more than Gym and perhaps one other class for the Fall of 1981, if even that much. That too, it seems to me, can be rationally inferred by Phil , and more rationally carried away by the language Phil uses, unless there was unit minimum to appear in the Campus Directory. Was there a unit minimum? . But, oh wait, that directory lists Obama A YEAR LATER in 1982-1983's school year. Ooops.


Oh Yeah...and Obama is alleged to have written one, just one article....in MARCH OF 1983! As it pertains to the Fall of 1981, we must say...so what?


Clearly, Obama probably did attend in 1982-1983 at Columbia...probably. But what about 1981-1982? That part, except for a probable Gym class at Columbia in the Fall of 1981, we simply have no right to expect he did anything more than that. So if people want to theorize about a lack of attendance , perhaps 1981-1982 would be a time, when like high school, Obama might be best speculated as having had a problem with drugs at that time (if we take in what he says in his ghost-written auto-biography).


So I understand why there are those who say he never attended, when realistically that claim is beginning to sound a bit more like something akin to what Oliver Stone might overlay in the same way he did with his JFK movie, specifically on Lee Harvey Oswald in New Orleans with the Printing House run by Ed Asner and Jack Lemmon's characters. It enters into a realm of questioning what is or is not fictitious about the man, and coming back with an answer that says: "without the transcripts and multi eyewitness testimony of those who attended classes with Obama...if any have...we simply don't and won't know." I think, for at least the Fall of 1981 to the Spring of 1982, it's probably more about Obama battling drug addiction than anything else...but again, we simply don't know.


In the NY Times, known repeatedly by scandals for intentional fiction writing


http://cityroom.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/01/30/where-obama-lived-in-1980s-new-york/

the eyewitness is one to the neighborhood Barack claims to have lived in, and NOT Obama personally.


"Frank Neubauer, 73, who has lived all his life in the building except for two years in Brooklyn, confirmed Mr. Obama’s account that it was a rough place back then. "


Unfortunately, not once does Neubauer or the other person (Mr. Burns) ever confirm that Barack ever lived in the same building as they. It is the NY Times writer who infers without any facts or confirmation.

Hence, not only was I correct in asserting Obama did NOT attend Columbia in the Spring of 1982, but I am also 100% correct in asserting he is NOT and NEVER was Constitutionally eligible to the US Presidency without a US Citizen Father and sole legience/nationality to the United States at birth. He is a fraud of the worst kind.

So if Obama transferred in June of 1981, what was he doing in New York City from that September 1981 to August of 1982?   Where did he get all his magical semester credits in order to graduate?  Answer, I believe to be the Fulbright scholarship to foreign under-graduate students like Obama who attended Occidental University, in which Community Organizing, Political activism, perhaps even hanging out and simply visiting foreign places like Indonesia, Pakistan, India, Kenya, and Great Britain racks up a bunch of "affirmative action" extra-curricular semester units applied toward a degree, with no redemptive value other than being a world tourist and observer.  I personally believe that Obama used his stolen Connecticut Social Security Number as a multi-national ( he still retained foreign citizen-ships of both Indonesia, Kenya, and Britain via his step-father and biological father at the time of his Occidental admittance), taking advantage of the opportunities  under the Fulbright Scholarship for foreign undergraduates at Occidental, but needing the Social Security number for some yet undetermined purpose to be discovered if or when his Occidental records are released.  Perhaps this pertains to his alleged US Citizenship for tax (if he worked part-time on campus for extra cash) or loan purposes.This would predate what we already know to be his stolen Connecticut Social Security Card associated with his alleged Selective Service Registration. 

--------------------

It seems to me that the Left is a polyglot of movements with differing agendas that can be somewhat summed up in the emotions expressed in this next song.  To me, "I've had enough" expresses the mass conflicts of the Left in this nation in an artistic/musical  format.



To get inside the music of Quadrophenia and certain selections some of the other music of The Who is to briefly get a glimpse inside the mind and direction of those of the 1960s and 1970s who still think-tank and lead the Left, and see the conflicts from where they have come from and where they still want to go...because it seems to me, that some of its thinkers like Bill Ayers and others have been so influenced by it, that they even seem to want to govern many of their themes by such patterns (even if subconsciously, as it were), it seems to me.

Thank you Donald Trump, for asking the question.
Thank you especially, Orly Taitz, for your years of dedication and devotion to try to protect your new homeland from a Communist-Socialist Usurpation, and the Fraud in Chief by whom the Communist-Socialist leaders wish to accomplish this by, while deceiving and manipulating the poor and financial yoked of the masses they rob as suckers, and have many of those whom they rob and fleece thank them for it.  Thank you kindly for all your tireless dedication and fidelity to the Constitution and the Republic of the United States of America (from this natural born US Citizen of two US Citizen parents).   Thank you kindly.

Meditations for Lent - Miracles are wondrous things - Resurrection

Although I personally do not recognize or observe the Tradition of Lent, I do understand its purpose.  Like Faith, preparation of one's heart should be a year-round event.  Every day we should be ready for the Rapture at any given moment, just as we should be mindful that at any given moment, our life can also otherwise end here on earth, if it is G-D's will.  We are to live courageously, not in fear.  And if we are martyred, let it be for the L-RD Jesus Christ, for the blood of His martyrs is the seed of the Church (as the ancient brother Irenaeus informs us).  By our witness and our words of faith in Christ, let us be remembered in echoes and those who have believed because of us, down through eternity. 



Meditation :  Miracles are wondrous things - Resurrection

Scripture -  Gospel of John 12:9-11
9 Much people of the Jews therefore knew that he was there: and they came not for Jesus' sake only, but that they might see Lazarus also, whom he had raised from the dead.

10 But the chief priests consulted that they might put Lazarus also to death;
11 Because that by reason of him many of the Jews went away, and believed on Jesus.


When Jesus raised Lazarus from the dead, the attraction was about as much to the miracle of a resurrection as to that of Jesus Himself. 

The people gloried in the miracle.  And the chief priests -- knowing that Lazarus was 4 days dead, producing worms out of the nostrils and in stink, and whatever other deteriorations happens at 4 days of death with a decaying body -- gloried NOT in the miracle, and the sign that this WAS Christ, rather moved their hearts to murder Lazarus, in order that they might rule over Israel as religious oppressors and demi-gods, and that Israel might no longer believe into their rightful Messiah, Christ the rightful King, of the seed of King David. 

The early Church Fathers tell us that those Jesus raised from the dead (by implication: Lazarus, Tabitha, etc.)  would go on to live another 87 years and more, until the reign of Caesar Hadrian, who came to power in 117 A.D. 

For many Christians in our day, such miracles are often beyond the scope of belief or comprehension.  Why should that be?  In America, it seems we have been infiltrated by unbelievers and apostates in both the congregation and in the ministry.  The pop-culture of today's modern Churches look to the Christian Church as being just another social network or social club, or place of philanthropy, and insist that the Bible should only be read and believed privately in the home, these should be unwelcomed by believers.  Often time, leftist agendas are pushed as if they are Gospel, and the Gospel as if amusing stories of faith to be praised, or manipulated into a humanist message, or simply tolerated and fawned at.

Lent is supposed to be a time of preparation of the remembrance of the Death, Burial and Resurrection of Jesus.  It is a definite fact of human history.  There is no molding of Christianity into whatever fad or preconceived political agenda we have today...it is entirely opposite.  We are to mold our agenda into those parameters and points which the Bible gives us.  We are to mold our daily lives and reflections into doing that which pleases G-D and is within the parameters of His will for ours lives.  We are to fully believe G-D first and foremost, and daily learn to trust Him more in the areas in which we have difficulty...hence, to be in the world and not of the world system. 

This life and born-again experience is meant to be like a resurrection from out of the world system, where we learn in the here and now, as we prepare to be citizens of Heaven upon our departure or death, and later those citizens of Heaven on Earth in the World to Come  in Christ's Kingdom.  

If we should come to those times when we see miracles of a truly profound experience, far above the many little miracles G-D provides us each and every day and hour in our lives...seek G-D and ask that He would (through the person of the Holy Spirit) give us the eyes and mind of discernment, and the ears to hear what the Holy Spirit says to us, as He speaks in wisdom advising or warning us in the whispers of the mind's ear(s). 
 
 
Prayer:
Almighty G-D, thank you for the miracles you provide us, great and small, for our benefit and our edification.  Help us to always glorify You, Father in Heaven, through Thy dear Son Jesus Chrsit whom Thou hast sent, and who for the saving of and redeeming of our souls and lives, died upon the Cross, paying for our sins, was buried, and rose the Third Day, as foretold in the Holy Scriptures.  Help us to know that Thy dear Son's Redemption of all who by faith believe into Thy dear Son, and thereby believe into You, is the greatest miracle of all, for by that act of faith and Your will, our lives are turned from mortal and perishing unto that which is eternal.  We are written in the Lamb's book of Life, and our souls are redeemed to You, with the promise of that new eternal body Thou wilt provide us through Thy dear Son Jesus Christ, with whom we shall go with forever and ever.  Thank you for the gift and promise of the Resurrection, both in the witness of  Lazurus, and that of thy dear Son's eternal Resurrection...now seated at Thy Right Side in Heaven, until You give the word that He should come for His Church, and remove us before the Time of Wrath, and again before the Time of Thy Great Wrath, after the manner of Enoch and Elijah's ascents. 
 
Our thoughts upon Christ hanging upon the Cross, having paid for our sins.  Selah.
 
Thank you for our Salvation, and the payments of all our sins for all time through the shed blood of Thy dear Son.  Selah.
 
Amen. 

Questions questions on this birther thing.

[Edited on March 19, 2011]


Donald Trump raises a reasonable skepticism that all politicians and Media should have raised on Obama. 
(excerpt)
"He grew up and nobody knew him...if I ever decide to run, you may go back and interview people from my kindergarten. They'll remember me. Nobody ever comes forward. Nobody knows who he is until later in his life. It's very strange."





The Media outlet called Antara, of Jakarta Indonesia remembers Obama in the First-Grade there.  One teacher in Hawaii that taught Obama when he visited the US for three or four weeks, while still a resident and citizen of Indonesia remembers Barack.  And with rare exceptions his history, except what he has already published or manufactured, is suppressed.  Why?  Unless he is a foreigner and a usurper, he has no legitimate excuse.  Even stealing a senior citizen from Connecticut's Social Security number at Arcadia Retirement Center in Honolulu isn't enough of an excuse to hide his past as vehemently as he does. 

The Left could hypothetically argue that Obama's private life would be too offensive to the American public, were it known certain of certain scandalous facts. 

What does that have to do with lack of qualifications from birth and the age when he was supposed to be a sole legience US Citizen? 

What does that have to do with his school records, his character and behavior in college, his thesis papers for his degrees, etc.?  Does he write like a six grader who was given a Saudi House of Saud blank check to the Universities he attended, and passed with "B" grades no matter how incompetent he was, as they used to do "athletes" or "jocks" for decades in America?

 Is Obama really just a dumb-ass front for the real movers and shakers, reading his Ebony, admiring his television appearances on tivo, admiring his myriads of magazine photos, attending his drunken Wednesday parties (if they are still going on like the Stevie Wonder festival and the import the St. Louis Pizza Restaurant at taxpayer expense parties of February 2009)?   Is he only in the office to be filling his time playing his b-ball and golf and what-have-you, and when it is time to be presented, being told to always stay on telepromter script (which is why he always travels with 25 teleprompters) he reads off the words on the screen and presents the illusion the Media and the Country want to perceive while some other unknown group to the rest of us runs the country?  Is that what we should be led to believe or ask about Obama?  Is everything something that someone else does, from ghost-writing to ghost-administering for him while he just signs his name to what someone else accomplishes, and his accomplishments are in name only?  Is that it?   Really? 

Why is it that the Media, who considers themselves as the cream of academic accomplishment by wagging around degrees and figures of their wages, cannot think on an academic plane and ask the questions they should have had the ability to ask at the University grade level the allegedly graduated at?  To them, everyone else who disagrees with their looking for justifying Liberalism excuses is stupid.  Meanwhile, they seemingly  privately and even publicly justify their beliefs most often with talking points spoon fed them as if in an elementary school.  In other words, perhaps we need to talk down to their grade level.
Then there is this dumbed-down Digitized Cartoon Format of alleged Sarah Palin and Barry Obama cartoon characters robotically discussing Obama's past that is for the pseudo-intellectual media that quite often seemingly can't form an intelligent argument outside their brown-nosing their producer or publisher talking points and/or off  their own teleprompters.



Problem with the above fictitious Sarah Palin cartoon is, that in real life, while she critcizes Chris Christie as not having guts --

http://thehill.com/blogs/ballot-box/gop-presidential-primary/148273-palin-vs-christie-gop-rock-stars-feud
March 09, 2011,The Hill reports that  former Governor of Alaska Sarah Palin tried to lecture current Governor of New Jersey Chris Christie as to what “real courage is”


-- like Glenn Beck, she lacks the fortitude and courage (i.e., the guts) on the upholding of the US Constitution v. Barry Obama-Soetoro with his identity theft and stolen SS#. 

The Nairobi Kenya Eastern Standard is the source of the Birther Movement, substantiated by other African Media and Kenya’s own Government Officials in Public Statement of fact in Transcript.

Of primary concern is the Nairobi Kenya Eastern Standard dated as Sunday, June 27, 2004.
Its headline reads:

Kenyan-born Obama all set for US Senate

The first line reads:

Kenyan-born US Senate hopeful, Barrack Obama, appeared set to take over the Illinois Senate seat after his main rival, Jack Ryan, dropped out of the race on Friday night amid a furor over lurid sex club allegations.

De facto, the Nairobi Kenya Eastern Standard states clearly in the headline that Senator Barack Obama is Kenyan born...hence, born in Kenya. http://web.archive.org/web/20040627142700/eastandard.net/headlines/news26060403.htm


There are no other living witnesses besides Barack's step-grandmother, who says she saw him birthed in Kenya.
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=107524
and that claim was vetted twice by Kenya's Parliament, one of which was only March of LAST YEAR!!!:

NATIONAL ASSEMBLY
OFFICIAL REPORT


Thursday, 25th March, 2010
The House met at 2.30 p.m.

p. 31 ...2nd paragraph (Mr. Orengo, Ministrer of Lands of the nation of Kenya, speaking):

"...how could a young man born here in Kenya, who is not even a native American, become the President of America? It is because they did away with exclusion."
http://www.scribd.com/doc/29758466/RDRAFT25

In others words, NON-Natural born Citizens of the US can now be President of the USA, starting with Barack Hussein Obama!!!

Only one lawyer remains standing with an active case against Obama, a loyal US patriot and naturalized Russian Immigrant to the United States, Orly Taitz.  Having come out of Cold War Communist Russia, she saw Obama for the fraud he is.  Unfortunately for us, America has gotten so far away from the proper study of Civics for so many decades, that the Progressives and Communists have wiped clean our understanding of Natural Born Citizenship.  It is something we had to relearn, and only one remains standing in the Courts.  They may make fun of her accent, of her being a dentist as well as a lawyer, of having difficulty at times processing information rapid fire in response in a language that is not her native language (hers being Russian).  I say, so what?  The other birther lawyers who have failed, I believe, such as Leo Donofrio and Mario Apuzzo, who I believe are truly interested in Justice, I am of the opinion that these should offer their pro bono expertise and assistance to help her save this very country of the United States of America that they were born in and that Orly has fled to for life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.  I personally cannot find any trust Phil Berg or Gary Kreep, in large part on their behavior in Court and how they have mistreated Orly Taitz...as I believe it to be the substantial and reasonable case...and have no opinion to any others.  These are my personal and unsolicited opinions and observations.

I cannot help but feel a little flustered (both agitated and confused) at Glenn Beck, who knows Obama subscribes to Marxist-Communism and an intent to destroy the USA, and has been bringing himself to realize this with the vast amounts of research and data on the Communist-Socialist conspiracy to overthrow the US, and rather than accept the data, to then on St. Patrick's Day, March 17, 2011, make a plea that if Obama would only say the right words such as on Japan or Libya, all is forgiven and he would follow him almost unquestioningly.  Is it cowardice or sheer stupidity on his part?  Or both? 

Glenn Beck on 3-17-2011, and the “if you would have said this speech” at (30:35 ff.)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KMSOr1Tz_B0

in spite of being a Marxist-Communist bent on overthrowing the US, Beck would follow Obama if only he made such a speech? What kind of osmotic vacuity is that, Glenn?   If your idea of an Oval Office speech was given by a President in the Oval Office, the UN Ambassadors would look for the urine puddle under the desk, and disrespect the weakness and quivering. You failed in leadership advice to look to G-D as sovereign, and you failed in leadership advice to cite an ever increasing intensity and frequency of earthquakes such as February 2010’s 8.8 on the Richter scale episode in Chile.
Have you already forgotten that NASA reported that the February 27, 2010 8.8 Earthquake in Chile shifted the axis of the earth by 3 inches and sped up the rotation of the Earth by 1.26 millionths of a second per day prior to Japan's event? 
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/earth-20100301.html

Having read the Bible and apocalyptic passages, how is this earthquake and tsunami  so "unimaginable" when one day a world-wide earthquake will swallow up every island on the planet according to the Bible?  Who are you kidding?  Quite acting and manipulating.  You may want to metaphorically wet your pants and wear your heart on your sleeve, but for a guy that is a sign of dementia, Glenn, NOT masculinity...something you might have learned if you bothered to have engaged in sports while growing up, even if it were just with the kids of your neighborhood. 
You also clearly failed in leadership advice to send teams of observers and a committal of (with the cooperation of Congress) $10 billion in immediate humanitarian aid resources by military transport, and the intense and immediate cooperation of the US Government to aid and assist the Japanese to establish camps of distribution and to get with an adopt a family for 30 days residency program while the Government seeks to set up and establish other alternative housing and relocation. And a whole host of other things that could have been said.

Obama is a Communist-Socialist,  who is by nature a sociopath-path, and you knowingly wish to be a follower as long as someone deceives you, makes you feel good, and allows you to keep more of your mammon / wealth without hindering your free speech rights? Will that be all it takes for you to go “All Hail our Leader So-and-So”?  Do we now have a political version of the Stockholm syndrome taking over your will because of your love of money, or are you simply not Christ's and vulnerable to the manipulations and deceptions of Satan that easily?

I also cannot help but feel somewhat flustered that Sarah Palin, someone who is supposed to be a sister in Christ Jesus, having legal standing to criticize and legally challenge Obama, now that she has financial resources and has recovered from the myriad of frivolous lawsuits and harassment against her, won't dare turn around and to legally and peacefully destroy the Political Presidency of a Usurper who is attempting to make the USA transition into Communism.

Sarah Palin has the ability and legal standing to legally and peacefully challenge and de-seat Obama by merely demanding an enforcement of the US Constitution on the natural born citizen clause...born to a US Citizen Father  (Article 2.1.5. and the 14th Amendment), born on US Soil (14th Amendment Section 1), and born with sole legience to the United States (Article 2.1.5 and the 14th Amendment) to parents who were legally US Citizens of an age to vote in 1961 (19th Amendment, Article 2.1.5., 14th Amendment).  Obama inheriting a US Citizenship from his foreign national father is NOT Natural...hence Obama is NOT a US Natural Born Citizen, but in order to seize the Presidency, he must be accepted as President because of a doing away with the Natural Born Citizen Clause, as the Minister of Lands in Kenya so rightly stated as quoted above.

Excuse me, but where was Article 2.1.5 amended by 2/3rds of the US Senate and ratified by 3/4ths of the 50 states of the United States so that there is no longer a United States Natural Born Citizen requirement, of not needing a US Citizen Father and being born with sole US legience, and maintaining a sole US Citizenship at the age one come to vote (be it age 18 or 21) in order to be a de facto and de jure US Natural Born Citizen ...the which, Obama fails on all counts?  Missed that one, didn't they?  You betcha.

Any time either Palin or Beck want to debate their lack of guts in taking on Obama's Identity Theft and the relevant Unconstitutionality of Obama, or their conscious betrayal of the US Constitution where it regards giving Barack a pass, I say to these two... bring it on!!!  It is time that they learn that with great position and wealth, also comes a great responsibility.  They have very much to learn, including humility for their intentional or unintentional ignorance and vanity in regard to being overly apologetic for the unConstitutional Barack Obama.  He may be in the Presidency, but he is not my President, nor that of the United States of America.  He is as if already voided, and an unlawful usurper in the putative position of the Presidency and pretending to have the authority he is presumed to have by the authority vested in him by the Constitution of the United States?  You mean, the same document he cites every time he signs an "Executive Order" but has no Constitutionality under Article 2.1.5, the 14th and 19th Amendments, etc.?  You mean THAT US Constitution?  Get educated you two.  The US Constitution and the legal concerns about its abuse by an unqualified office holder in the Presidency is more than just a "birther thing".

Proverbs states to this effect:
Faithful are the wounds of a friend, moreso than the kisses of an enemy. 

And it is this context that I criticize Sarah Palin and Glenn Beck. 
They damn well should know better.  Or is it like as what Jesus said?
You cannot serve G-D and Mamon...I am come in My Father's Name, and ye receive Me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive.   

...He that hath an ear to hear, let him hear.

Amen.

Psalm 110 - in KJV and AWPR (Alternate with Word Pictures and ReiterationsTranslation)

The AWPR, Alternate with Word Pictures and Reiterations translation is my work product, intended for an enhanced understanding of what is made available to the mind of the rabbinic Hebrew reader in an English translation format. The translation is in strict adherence to the Hebrew's intent and adhere to only the possible linguistic translations. Because the Biblical Hebrew has less than 9,000 primary words and the English language has more than 500,000...for that reason, it sometimes takes a good many words to get a point of a word picture or word pictures across in the English language. The King James is an excellent terse literal Hebrew translation of the Scriptures, but for those who want a little more before going into the Hebrew themselves, or to perhaps encourage and excite them to do so, I offer the following inspiration to help motivate them to do so.

Shalom in Christ Jesus,
Brianroy

(Large print = KJV translation, small bold print = AWPR translation)




Psalm 110


1 - The LORD said unto my Lord, Sit thou at my right hand, until I make thine enemies thy footstool.

1) An oracle statementof YHVeH to    My Master / My Lord.
    Sit, remain and dwell at My Right Hand /  Sit, remain and dwell at My Right Side
    until I give over, setting and appointing
    Your enemies who hate (You) with hostility
    as a footstool for the dominion of your feet. 

2 - The LORD shall send the rod of thy strength out of Zion: rule thou in the midst of thine enemies.

2)  Like an overspreading bedsheet,
     the Staff of your strength shall send forth YHVeH out of Zion: 
     in the inner midst and among those hating You as your enemies,
     tread with domnion / over-rule / and scrape (them) out. 


3 - Thy people shall be willing in the day of thy power, in the beauties of holiness from the womb of the morning: thou hast the dew of thy youth.

3)  Your kinsmen from the fathers
      shall do noble deeds and be willing
      in the Day of your firm enduring power and might;
      (they shall be as) the adorning glorious array of you holiness,
      as (those coming forth) from the womb
      of the first light of the day in a pre-dawn sky lighting across the heavens,
      and (shall be) as the falling / dripping dew of your childhood / youth.


4 - The LORD hath sworn, and will not repent, Thou art a priest for ever after the order of Melchizedek.

4)  YHVeH has sworn a solemn seven-fold oath,
      and NOT will (He) breathe deep with sorrow / regret / or repentence
      (He will NOT change His mind
       and reverse course on what He has sworn and is resolved to do)
       NOR will (He) have need to be comforted.


      You are a Kohen, a Priest to the ages, to forever,
       above, ascended beyond in height,
       according to the manner / cause / reasoning of
       bearing (the title of) and being
       Malchizedek
       King of Righteousness /
       (He who is) the fullness of the burning branding of the consuming fire of Righteousness.



5 - The Lord at thy right hand shall strike through kings in the day of his wrath.

5) The Master / Lord
    at Your Right Hand / at Your Right Side
    severely wounds with a lethal and decisive blow
    striking / shattering kings
    in the Day of His Wrath /
    in the Day of His Great Displeasure
          (as if a sudden point of fury at being offended at mankind's sins).



6 - He shall judge among the heathen, he shall fill the places with the dead bodies; he shall wound the heads over many countries.

6)  He shall judge the nations,
     raising the Hand
     vexing them with great emotional affliction and tribulation
     which He will fill or make full with corpses.
     He will severely wound with a lethal and decisive blow,
     striking venom / gall
     over a great many lands of the Earth from high above the Earth.




7 - He shall drink of the brook in the way: therefore shall he lift up the head.



7)  From the wadi brook torrent in the Way
     (of the Wide Course in the Wilderness)
    He shall drink down (as though He were consuming wine at a feast);
    and setting (all things) aright / upright from above
    He shall lift up the head.

--------------------------
Comments in brief:
In regard to verse 1.  To what is referred by the phrase "until I make thine enemies thy footstool" or the expanded and reiterated word picture translation "until I give over, setting and appointing Your enemies who hate (You) with hostility as a footstool for the dominion of your feet"?   In Scripture, such as through Isaiah 52:7 we see that the Gospel of Peace is carried by the feet of him who brings Good News (i.e., the Gospel). 


In regard to verse 2 "like an overspreading bedsheet" is the Hebrew referring back to the event of G-D coming down upon Mount Sinai, even as Rashi refers to in commenting on Exodus 19:20:
vayaired YHVeH al-Har Sinai {"And came down YHVeH on Mount Sinai"} -
Because it says in Exodus 20:19 "You have seen that from the heavens I have spoken to you"...
"It teaches that He bent the Upper and Lower Heavens, and spread them over the mountain [of Sinai] like a sheet on a bed / couch and the Throne of Glory descended upon them."


In regard to verse 4, he will not need to be comforted.  There is a popular quote used at synagogue and among Jews that says: Nahamu, nahamu ammi - "Comfort ye, comfort ye My People" from Isaiah 40:1.  G-D who knows everything, including the future, will NOT be placing Himself in a state of grief or regret in making the Son of G-D, Jesus Christ, after the order of Melchizedek. 
Mal = Fullness, ki = the burning branding or branding fire that consumes, tzedek = righteousness.